This document outlines an introductory course on learning and educational technology. It provides the schedule, objectives, contents and learning outcomes of the course. The course will cover basic concepts of educational technology and examine its role in learning society. Students will create a digital portfolio to document their learning and expertise. The course involves lectures, workshops, collaborative work and portfolio assignments. It will be assessed based on participation and quality of digital portfolio.
The document outlines the structure and content of an introductory course on learning and educational technology. It discusses topics that will be covered in lectures and workshops, including learning theories, educational technologies, and developing a digital portfolio. Students will create blog posts reflecting on their understanding and goals for the course. Assessment is based on active participation, portfolio assignments, and a final digital story. The course aims to introduce students to the field of educational technology and how technology can support learning.
Bringing e-assessment to a higher maturity on a national scaleAlfred Hartoog
can monitor progress
can adapt tests to level of student
- More effective learning
- Teachers: can monitor progress of whole class
- Early intervention possible
- National test database: reuse of tests, quality assurance
Educause october 2011 19
Impact so far:
- Reduced drop-out rates in first year bachelor programs
- Improved progression of students through formative testing
- Reduced teacher workload through computer-based marking
- Increased quality of testing through collaboration and expertise network
- Successful projects like adaptive testing in math and statistics are inspiring
other disciplines
- National infrastructure facilitates further scaling of e-assessment initiatives
- SURF program stimulates
This document discusses new learning practices and learning analytics for educational innovation. It provides an overview of CEITER, a research center focusing on learning analytics and educational innovation. Some key points:
- CEITER aims to measure and support new collaborative, creative, and problem-based learning practices through learning analytics and educational research.
- Examples of projects include measuring technology use in schools, tools for collaborative learning, and tracing learning in digital environments.
- Research looks at the coupling of individual and collective learning, with cognition seen as mediated by social and material environments.
- CEITER aims to build research infrastructure to increase funding opportunities, recruit students, and boost visibility through a more systematic, collaborative approach.
Scaling Informal Learning and Meaning Making at the Workplacetobold
The document discusses mechanisms for scaling informal learning at the workplace. It describes how informal learning currently occurs through asking colleagues and learning from experience, but traditional learning technologies don't support this and instead follow formal classroom models. It then outlines several mechanisms that can help scale informal learning, such as looking at learning within work practices, unlocking peer production, providing scaffolding for meaningful learning, and scaling through regional clusters.
Problemløsning. Samarbeid. Innovasjon. Digital læring. Kritisk tenkning. Eleven som produsent. Det er noen av nøkkelordene i det fremadstormende internasjonale begrep 21. århundrenes kompetanse (21st century Skills). Begrepet handler overordnet om at elever utvikler kompetanse til å bruke i samfunnet de skal bevege seg ut i, etter skolen.
Hva forstår vi egentlig med begrepet i Norden? Hvor langt er de nordiske landene med å bruke digitale verktøy til å understøtte denne kompetansen? Det har to forskere fra Aarhus Universitet undersøkt for Styrelsen for It og Læring (STIL):
How can technology change the way we teach and learn stoa, 6 may 2015dvndamme
This document discusses how technology can change the way we learn and teach. It explores how technology is impacting skills demand and educational delivery. While technology has been touted as revolutionizing education, evidence on its impact is mixed. The document outlines some promising ways technology could enhance education, such as expanding access to content, supporting new collaborative pedagogies, and providing faster feedback. However, barriers like teachers' and students' limited digital skills and the personal nature of education limit productivity gains from technology. More interactive courseware and social learning tools show potential if developed with strong instructional design.
Panagiotis Zervas and Demetrios G. Sampson, Supporting the assessment of problem solving competences through inquiry-based teaching in school science education: The Inspiring Science Education tools, Webinar Slides, eTwinning Creative Classroom Group, 28 April 2015
The document discusses several challenges facing distance education in the 21st century that should inform the research agenda. It identifies issues such as the need to broaden access through open educational resources and collaboration between institutions, determining best practices for quality assurance across different contexts, and harnessing digital technologies while addressing the digital divide. Research is needed to understand the optimal scale, models, and use of technologies for distance education to fulfill its mission of providing inclusive and equitable higher education opportunities.
The document outlines the structure and content of an introductory course on learning and educational technology. It discusses topics that will be covered in lectures and workshops, including learning theories, educational technologies, and developing a digital portfolio. Students will create blog posts reflecting on their understanding and goals for the course. Assessment is based on active participation, portfolio assignments, and a final digital story. The course aims to introduce students to the field of educational technology and how technology can support learning.
Bringing e-assessment to a higher maturity on a national scaleAlfred Hartoog
can monitor progress
can adapt tests to level of student
- More effective learning
- Teachers: can monitor progress of whole class
- Early intervention possible
- National test database: reuse of tests, quality assurance
Educause october 2011 19
Impact so far:
- Reduced drop-out rates in first year bachelor programs
- Improved progression of students through formative testing
- Reduced teacher workload through computer-based marking
- Increased quality of testing through collaboration and expertise network
- Successful projects like adaptive testing in math and statistics are inspiring
other disciplines
- National infrastructure facilitates further scaling of e-assessment initiatives
- SURF program stimulates
This document discusses new learning practices and learning analytics for educational innovation. It provides an overview of CEITER, a research center focusing on learning analytics and educational innovation. Some key points:
- CEITER aims to measure and support new collaborative, creative, and problem-based learning practices through learning analytics and educational research.
- Examples of projects include measuring technology use in schools, tools for collaborative learning, and tracing learning in digital environments.
- Research looks at the coupling of individual and collective learning, with cognition seen as mediated by social and material environments.
- CEITER aims to build research infrastructure to increase funding opportunities, recruit students, and boost visibility through a more systematic, collaborative approach.
Scaling Informal Learning and Meaning Making at the Workplacetobold
The document discusses mechanisms for scaling informal learning at the workplace. It describes how informal learning currently occurs through asking colleagues and learning from experience, but traditional learning technologies don't support this and instead follow formal classroom models. It then outlines several mechanisms that can help scale informal learning, such as looking at learning within work practices, unlocking peer production, providing scaffolding for meaningful learning, and scaling through regional clusters.
Problemløsning. Samarbeid. Innovasjon. Digital læring. Kritisk tenkning. Eleven som produsent. Det er noen av nøkkelordene i det fremadstormende internasjonale begrep 21. århundrenes kompetanse (21st century Skills). Begrepet handler overordnet om at elever utvikler kompetanse til å bruke i samfunnet de skal bevege seg ut i, etter skolen.
Hva forstår vi egentlig med begrepet i Norden? Hvor langt er de nordiske landene med å bruke digitale verktøy til å understøtte denne kompetansen? Det har to forskere fra Aarhus Universitet undersøkt for Styrelsen for It og Læring (STIL):
How can technology change the way we teach and learn stoa, 6 may 2015dvndamme
This document discusses how technology can change the way we learn and teach. It explores how technology is impacting skills demand and educational delivery. While technology has been touted as revolutionizing education, evidence on its impact is mixed. The document outlines some promising ways technology could enhance education, such as expanding access to content, supporting new collaborative pedagogies, and providing faster feedback. However, barriers like teachers' and students' limited digital skills and the personal nature of education limit productivity gains from technology. More interactive courseware and social learning tools show potential if developed with strong instructional design.
Panagiotis Zervas and Demetrios G. Sampson, Supporting the assessment of problem solving competences through inquiry-based teaching in school science education: The Inspiring Science Education tools, Webinar Slides, eTwinning Creative Classroom Group, 28 April 2015
The document discusses several challenges facing distance education in the 21st century that should inform the research agenda. It identifies issues such as the need to broaden access through open educational resources and collaboration between institutions, determining best practices for quality assurance across different contexts, and harnessing digital technologies while addressing the digital divide. Research is needed to understand the optimal scale, models, and use of technologies for distance education to fulfill its mission of providing inclusive and equitable higher education opportunities.
This document discusses strategies for making e-learning more effective and disruptive. It suggests that e-learning has not fully replaced traditional education and proposes ideas to disrupt traditional pedagogies, including shifting from learning management systems to digital repositories, focusing on learning activities rather than content, and supporting interaction over information delivery. It also advocates assessing learning journeys rather than just end products.
ICT infrastructure (PDST Technology in Education)Seán Gallagher
This document discusses changes in ICT infrastructure and challenges in schools. It covers how cloud computing, broadband connectivity, wireless networks, and devices can help improve teaching and learning. Some potential challenges to ICT integration are beliefs about pedagogy, curriculum pressures, assessment demands, infrastructure issues, and funding constraints. The document also provides guidance on procurement of wireless networks in schools, emphasizing the need for scalable, high-quality, and future-proof solutions to meet rising demands of mobile learning.
Speak Up ISTE Presentation Mobile Devices Web Usage 06/28/10Julie Evans
The document discusses findings from the Speak Up 2009 survey conducted by Project Tomorrow. The survey gathered input from over 370,000 K-12 students, teachers, parents and administrators regarding their views on emerging technologies. Key findings include students' vision for 21st century learning incorporating digitally-rich, un-tethered and social-based elements. Educators see benefits like increased engagement but also have concerns about distraction. While most groups see technology's potential, obstacles like policies and training need to be addressed to fully realize this in classrooms.
This document summarizes a keynote presentation on scaling up ICT-enabled educational innovation at the system level in Europe and Asia. It discusses the problems of many small-scale innovative projects lacking systemic impact and sustainability. It analyzes frameworks and case studies of successful initiatives in Europe and Asia that achieved scale and identified cross-cutting factors like long-term planning, teacher training, and linking research and practice. The presentation concludes with a summary of top policy recommendations from a stakeholder consultation, emphasizing professional development, infrastructure, assessment, and organizational support to enable teachers to drive innovative practices with ICT.
Peter Bullen discusses his experience with technology enhanced learning (TEL) and the opportunities and challenges it presents. He outlines seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education and how TEL can help achieve them. While TEL provides opportunities to improve learning, it also faces challenges at the sector, institution, discipline, individual, and technological levels. Critical success factors for innovating, sustaining and embedding TEL include having a team with a "can-do" culture, continually developing networks, and adopting a philosophy of continuous improvement focused on student learning experiences.
Presentation on where do secondary schools see ICT and the potential for it in schools. Presented at Victorian Catholic Secondary Teaching and Learning Conference, August 2011
Learning in the 21st Century: 2011 Trends UpdateJulie Evans
This document summarizes a presentation about online learning trends based on the Speak Up research project. Key points include:
- Participation in online learning is growing among various student groups and more administrators are offering online options.
- Factors driving growth include keeping students engaged and increasing graduation rates. Students are motivated by flexibility and control over their learning.
- Barriers to adoption include teacher reluctance and lack of skills/support, while quality is defined by standards alignment and ease of use.
- Teachers are most motivated by flexibility and compensation, though experience matters more than incentives for reluctant teachers.
The presentation concludes with a panel discussion on creating successful online learning programs.
Introduction to e-Portfolios from JISC's Lisa GrayJISC Netskills
An introduction to e-portfolios from Lisa Gray (JISC Programme Manager) that formed part of a programme of workshops facilitated by JISC Netskills. It discusses a number of aspects of e-portfolios and explores experiences gained through the JISC e-portfolios programme of projects.
This document summarizes Gráinne Conole's presentation on teaching as a design science. It discusses how teaching can benefit from an evidence-based and creative design approach using learning design methodology. Conole outlines technological trends in education and challenges in teacher practice. She presents learning design as a way to promote reflection and encourage the sharing of teaching designs and resources. The presentation argues that disaggregation of education through open educational resources allows for more flexible learning pathways.
The document summarizes a study on the strategic management of e-learning technologies at universities. It analyzed 11 case studies across North America and Europe to understand institutions' goals for technology, instructor and administrator preparedness, challenges, and recommendations. Key findings included that goals were often too conservative and costs were unknown; instructors and administrators often lacked preparation; and institutions failed to innovate or use technology to transform teaching despite opportunities to increase flexibility and develop skills.
The document discusses issues and challenges in integrating information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching and learning in Malaysian schools. It notes that while the Ministry of Education has invested in equipping teachers and students with ICT skills, there remain issues such as ICT not always being used effectively, an inability to interact personally, and over-reliance making students less skilled manually. Challenges include not all schools, especially in remote areas, being able to apply ICT effectively due to lack of infrastructure or teacher skills/motivation. The replacement of damaged equipment is also a long process.
The document discusses issues and challenges in integrating information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching and learning in Malaysian schools. It notes that while the Ministry of Education has invested in equipping teachers and students with ICT skills, there remain issues such as ICT not always being used effectively, an inability to interact personally, and over-reliance making students less skilled manually. Challenges include not all schools having effective ICT access, presentations distracting students, content becoming boring if not varied, and lack of technical support and teacher ICT skills and motivation.
The document summarizes a discussion about online learning based on data from the Speak Up research project. It introduces expert panelists to discuss key questions: students' vision for online learning and how it compares to educators' realities and parents' perspectives, challenges to implementing online learning and benefits realized, and how the student vision can influence future online solutions. The agenda covers an overview of Speak Up data on online learning trends and a conversation with stakeholders.
Emerging Technologies in Higher Education: A guide for HE practitionersDaniela Gachago
This document discusses emerging technologies and changing teaching and learning practices in higher education. It begins by providing context from various sources on the promise of emerging technologies and how institutions are struggling to keep up with innovations. It then summarizes the key findings of an NRF project on emerging ICTs in South African higher education. The project found that while technologies like social media and research databases are commonly used, adoption is driven more by passionate individuals than systemic institutional support. The document concludes by discussing case studies that illustrate how emerging technologies can facilitate authentic and collaborative learning when implemented effectively.
La presentazione tenuta da Paolo Ferri durante la giornata di Librinnovando tenutasi a Milano (IED) il 12 novembre 2010. Per ulteriori informazioni relative all'evento visita http://www.ledizioni.it/librinnovando
This document summarizes the results of the 2010 Speak Up survey conducted by Project Tomorrow. The survey gathered input from over 379,000 K-12 students, teachers, parents, and administrators across the United States about issues related to technology use in education. Key findings include that students see themselves as self-directed learners who make use of online resources, social media, and mobile devices to direct their own learning. Students also expressed a preference for hands-on and collaborative learning over traditional lectures. The survey results suggest that schools will need to adapt to support more flexible, personalized, and digitally-rich learning environments in order to engage today's students.
The document discusses an educational approach using project-based learning (PBL) and self-learning at RajakiyaPratibhaVikasVidyalaya Sector XI Rohini Delhi. Students have created over 80 group and individual projects on various topics. A web portal allows students to upload presentations. The school aims to provide alternatives to rote memorization and uses PBL, self-learning corners, and a mini math library. Students take ownership of their learning while teachers facilitate. The approach helps students develop skills like problem-solving and collaboration to better handle the increasing knowledge in the world.
A New Vision for 21st Century Learning: Students "Speak Up" about Emerging Te...Julie Evans
Students envision a new vision for 21st century learning that leverages emerging technologies. This vision includes three essential elements: social-based learning using tools for collaboration and communication, un-tethered learning that transcends classroom walls using mobile devices, and digitally-rich learning using interactive, relevant digital content and resources. The document discusses findings from the Speak Up research project regarding students' perspectives and desires around technology use in education.
The Demand Gap for Online Learning: Latest Trends from the Speak Up ResearchJulie Evans
Project Tomorrow conducted a national research project called Speak Up to survey K-12 students, teachers, parents, and administrators about technology use in education. The document summarizes key findings from Speak Up surveys between 2003-2010 which indicate that students envision a more social, un-tethered, and digitally-rich model of online learning compared to current implementation. It also found disconnects between students' vision and how educators are currently using technology in the classroom.
This document discusses expertise and expert performance in higher education and work life. It defines expertise as the ability to consistently perform at a superior level. There are two main types of expertise: routine expertise, which involves familiar skills and routines; and adaptive expertise, which enables individuals to solve novel problems, think flexibly, and build new knowledge. Adaptive expertise is most valued today as work life requires competency in changing situations. True experts excel at generating solutions, recognizing patterns, and using effective strategies, but can also be overconfident or context-dependent. The document emphasizes that expertise is increasingly collaborative and requires strong social and learning skills to develop shared understanding.
The document discusses the concept of "islands of expertise", where individuals can develop deep understanding of topics they are interested in through social and cognitive processes. It describes how knowledge is constructed over multiple informal activities like conversations. This knowledge building occurs within a social context, with support from others. Over time, individual islands of expertise can connect to form an "archipelago" of related conceptual knowledge across different domains. The document provides examples of how a child and parent might collaboratively build knowledge about vehicles or cooking through their discussions. It suggests educators can help students develop expertise by structuring learning as a social process where novices work with experts in modeling deeper understanding.
This document discusses strategies for making e-learning more effective and disruptive. It suggests that e-learning has not fully replaced traditional education and proposes ideas to disrupt traditional pedagogies, including shifting from learning management systems to digital repositories, focusing on learning activities rather than content, and supporting interaction over information delivery. It also advocates assessing learning journeys rather than just end products.
ICT infrastructure (PDST Technology in Education)Seán Gallagher
This document discusses changes in ICT infrastructure and challenges in schools. It covers how cloud computing, broadband connectivity, wireless networks, and devices can help improve teaching and learning. Some potential challenges to ICT integration are beliefs about pedagogy, curriculum pressures, assessment demands, infrastructure issues, and funding constraints. The document also provides guidance on procurement of wireless networks in schools, emphasizing the need for scalable, high-quality, and future-proof solutions to meet rising demands of mobile learning.
Speak Up ISTE Presentation Mobile Devices Web Usage 06/28/10Julie Evans
The document discusses findings from the Speak Up 2009 survey conducted by Project Tomorrow. The survey gathered input from over 370,000 K-12 students, teachers, parents and administrators regarding their views on emerging technologies. Key findings include students' vision for 21st century learning incorporating digitally-rich, un-tethered and social-based elements. Educators see benefits like increased engagement but also have concerns about distraction. While most groups see technology's potential, obstacles like policies and training need to be addressed to fully realize this in classrooms.
This document summarizes a keynote presentation on scaling up ICT-enabled educational innovation at the system level in Europe and Asia. It discusses the problems of many small-scale innovative projects lacking systemic impact and sustainability. It analyzes frameworks and case studies of successful initiatives in Europe and Asia that achieved scale and identified cross-cutting factors like long-term planning, teacher training, and linking research and practice. The presentation concludes with a summary of top policy recommendations from a stakeholder consultation, emphasizing professional development, infrastructure, assessment, and organizational support to enable teachers to drive innovative practices with ICT.
Peter Bullen discusses his experience with technology enhanced learning (TEL) and the opportunities and challenges it presents. He outlines seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education and how TEL can help achieve them. While TEL provides opportunities to improve learning, it also faces challenges at the sector, institution, discipline, individual, and technological levels. Critical success factors for innovating, sustaining and embedding TEL include having a team with a "can-do" culture, continually developing networks, and adopting a philosophy of continuous improvement focused on student learning experiences.
Presentation on where do secondary schools see ICT and the potential for it in schools. Presented at Victorian Catholic Secondary Teaching and Learning Conference, August 2011
Learning in the 21st Century: 2011 Trends UpdateJulie Evans
This document summarizes a presentation about online learning trends based on the Speak Up research project. Key points include:
- Participation in online learning is growing among various student groups and more administrators are offering online options.
- Factors driving growth include keeping students engaged and increasing graduation rates. Students are motivated by flexibility and control over their learning.
- Barriers to adoption include teacher reluctance and lack of skills/support, while quality is defined by standards alignment and ease of use.
- Teachers are most motivated by flexibility and compensation, though experience matters more than incentives for reluctant teachers.
The presentation concludes with a panel discussion on creating successful online learning programs.
Introduction to e-Portfolios from JISC's Lisa GrayJISC Netskills
An introduction to e-portfolios from Lisa Gray (JISC Programme Manager) that formed part of a programme of workshops facilitated by JISC Netskills. It discusses a number of aspects of e-portfolios and explores experiences gained through the JISC e-portfolios programme of projects.
This document summarizes Gráinne Conole's presentation on teaching as a design science. It discusses how teaching can benefit from an evidence-based and creative design approach using learning design methodology. Conole outlines technological trends in education and challenges in teacher practice. She presents learning design as a way to promote reflection and encourage the sharing of teaching designs and resources. The presentation argues that disaggregation of education through open educational resources allows for more flexible learning pathways.
The document summarizes a study on the strategic management of e-learning technologies at universities. It analyzed 11 case studies across North America and Europe to understand institutions' goals for technology, instructor and administrator preparedness, challenges, and recommendations. Key findings included that goals were often too conservative and costs were unknown; instructors and administrators often lacked preparation; and institutions failed to innovate or use technology to transform teaching despite opportunities to increase flexibility and develop skills.
The document discusses issues and challenges in integrating information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching and learning in Malaysian schools. It notes that while the Ministry of Education has invested in equipping teachers and students with ICT skills, there remain issues such as ICT not always being used effectively, an inability to interact personally, and over-reliance making students less skilled manually. Challenges include not all schools, especially in remote areas, being able to apply ICT effectively due to lack of infrastructure or teacher skills/motivation. The replacement of damaged equipment is also a long process.
The document discusses issues and challenges in integrating information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching and learning in Malaysian schools. It notes that while the Ministry of Education has invested in equipping teachers and students with ICT skills, there remain issues such as ICT not always being used effectively, an inability to interact personally, and over-reliance making students less skilled manually. Challenges include not all schools having effective ICT access, presentations distracting students, content becoming boring if not varied, and lack of technical support and teacher ICT skills and motivation.
The document summarizes a discussion about online learning based on data from the Speak Up research project. It introduces expert panelists to discuss key questions: students' vision for online learning and how it compares to educators' realities and parents' perspectives, challenges to implementing online learning and benefits realized, and how the student vision can influence future online solutions. The agenda covers an overview of Speak Up data on online learning trends and a conversation with stakeholders.
Emerging Technologies in Higher Education: A guide for HE practitionersDaniela Gachago
This document discusses emerging technologies and changing teaching and learning practices in higher education. It begins by providing context from various sources on the promise of emerging technologies and how institutions are struggling to keep up with innovations. It then summarizes the key findings of an NRF project on emerging ICTs in South African higher education. The project found that while technologies like social media and research databases are commonly used, adoption is driven more by passionate individuals than systemic institutional support. The document concludes by discussing case studies that illustrate how emerging technologies can facilitate authentic and collaborative learning when implemented effectively.
La presentazione tenuta da Paolo Ferri durante la giornata di Librinnovando tenutasi a Milano (IED) il 12 novembre 2010. Per ulteriori informazioni relative all'evento visita http://www.ledizioni.it/librinnovando
This document summarizes the results of the 2010 Speak Up survey conducted by Project Tomorrow. The survey gathered input from over 379,000 K-12 students, teachers, parents, and administrators across the United States about issues related to technology use in education. Key findings include that students see themselves as self-directed learners who make use of online resources, social media, and mobile devices to direct their own learning. Students also expressed a preference for hands-on and collaborative learning over traditional lectures. The survey results suggest that schools will need to adapt to support more flexible, personalized, and digitally-rich learning environments in order to engage today's students.
The document discusses an educational approach using project-based learning (PBL) and self-learning at RajakiyaPratibhaVikasVidyalaya Sector XI Rohini Delhi. Students have created over 80 group and individual projects on various topics. A web portal allows students to upload presentations. The school aims to provide alternatives to rote memorization and uses PBL, self-learning corners, and a mini math library. Students take ownership of their learning while teachers facilitate. The approach helps students develop skills like problem-solving and collaboration to better handle the increasing knowledge in the world.
A New Vision for 21st Century Learning: Students "Speak Up" about Emerging Te...Julie Evans
Students envision a new vision for 21st century learning that leverages emerging technologies. This vision includes three essential elements: social-based learning using tools for collaboration and communication, un-tethered learning that transcends classroom walls using mobile devices, and digitally-rich learning using interactive, relevant digital content and resources. The document discusses findings from the Speak Up research project regarding students' perspectives and desires around technology use in education.
The Demand Gap for Online Learning: Latest Trends from the Speak Up ResearchJulie Evans
Project Tomorrow conducted a national research project called Speak Up to survey K-12 students, teachers, parents, and administrators about technology use in education. The document summarizes key findings from Speak Up surveys between 2003-2010 which indicate that students envision a more social, un-tethered, and digitally-rich model of online learning compared to current implementation. It also found disconnects between students' vision and how educators are currently using technology in the classroom.
This document discusses expertise and expert performance in higher education and work life. It defines expertise as the ability to consistently perform at a superior level. There are two main types of expertise: routine expertise, which involves familiar skills and routines; and adaptive expertise, which enables individuals to solve novel problems, think flexibly, and build new knowledge. Adaptive expertise is most valued today as work life requires competency in changing situations. True experts excel at generating solutions, recognizing patterns, and using effective strategies, but can also be overconfident or context-dependent. The document emphasizes that expertise is increasingly collaborative and requires strong social and learning skills to develop shared understanding.
The document discusses the concept of "islands of expertise", where individuals can develop deep understanding of topics they are interested in through social and cognitive processes. It describes how knowledge is constructed over multiple informal activities like conversations. This knowledge building occurs within a social context, with support from others. Over time, individual islands of expertise can connect to form an "archipelago" of related conceptual knowledge across different domains. The document provides examples of how a child and parent might collaboratively build knowledge about vehicles or cooking through their discussions. It suggests educators can help students develop expertise by structuring learning as a social process where novices work with experts in modeling deeper understanding.
This document outlines the steps and tasks for students to clarify the theoretical basis of their master's thesis. It instructs students to:
1) Find and present 5 key references on collaborative learning and self-regulated learning to their group and justify their choices.
2) Evaluate and comment on other groups' reference choices.
3) Write individual summaries on the references from both perspectives and submit them by January 17th, 2013.
The document also provides literature suggestions to support the thesis research process.
This document outlines different methods that can be used to measure self-regulated learning. It discusses measuring SRL as both an aptitude and an event, and some of the challenges in measurement. Some key methods mentioned include self-report questionnaires, observations of student behavior, think-aloud protocols, learning diaries, interviews, and analyzing digital traces of student interactions in online learning environments. The document advocates for using mixed methods to address limitations of individual approaches and gain a more comprehensive understanding of students' self-regulated learning.
The document discusses expertise in work life and education. It outlines two types of expertise - routine expertise, which involves familiar skills and routines, and adaptive expertise, which involves flexibility and the ability to solve novel problems. Experts in different fields were interviewed and described expertise as developmental, requiring constant learning. Problems in work often involve social and technical challenges. The document also proposes methods for developing adaptive expertise in education, including collaborative problem-solving of authentic problems over multiple cycles and having students document their own learning processes.
The document outlines guidance for master's thesis students on developing their research plans. It discusses defining the research context, justifying the importance of the research, reviewing earlier studies on the topic, identifying central concepts and theoretical frameworks, establishing research aims and questions, selecting appropriate methods and types of data, and roles and responsibilities of the researcher. Students worked in groups to define parts of their "research puzzles" and presented their preliminary plans to receive feedback from peers.
This document discusses self-regulated learning. It defines self-regulated learning as an active process where learners plan, monitor, and evaluate their cognition, motivation, and behavior during learning. A key part of self-regulated learning is goal setting and strategic planning to optimize one's learning. The document outlines a cyclical model of self-regulated learning involving task understanding, planning goals and strategies, enacting strategies through monitoring and control, and evaluating progress. Developing skills in self-regulation can improve learning outcomes.
This document discusses monitoring, reflecting on, and documenting learning experiences. It describes how expert profiles and portfolios can be used by students to foster learning and by teachers to improve instruction. Students are encouraged to monitor their experiences, document them through various media, and write expert profiles several times during their studies to reflect on their learning. Reflecting is important for learning and developing expertise. The document provides guidance on what students should monitor, such as their understanding, strategies, experiences, and abilities, and how they can get started writing an expert profile.
Eddie Denessen, Geert Driessen & Joep Bakker (2010) AERA Cognitive and non co...Driessen Research
1) A study analyzed the cognitive and non-cognitive effects of diversity in Dutch elementary schools, finding weak or absent effects on cognitive outcomes but no evidence of improved intergroup attitudes.
2) Methodological issues made determining the effects of classroom diversity difficult, and teacher attitudes and expectations were found to impact student performance.
3) International comparisons found stronger peer effects in other countries, possibly due to differences in levels of segregation and school choice systems. Better accounting for teacher variables was suggested to improve understanding of diversity's effects.
This document discusses expertise and how it is developed. It defines experts as those who are highly skilled and knowledgeable in a specific domain. Experts think differently than novices - they can recognize problems more easily and solve them efficiently. The document discusses how expertise is built through a process of competence development over time, involving the construction of knowledge, expert-like performance, and self-regulation. Novice learners can develop "islands of expertise" in areas they are personally interested in through collaborative learning experiences. True expertise requires extensive experience and practice within a domain.
The document provides an overview of an introductory educational technology minor subject studies program taking place from 2012-2013 at the University of Oulu in Finland. The program consists of four courses offered in the autumn and spring semesters that cover topics such as learning theory, designing technology-enhanced learning, and educational projects. The goal is for students to gain skills in evaluating educational technologies, recognizing their role in learning societies, and applying learning theories to collaborative learning contexts. Students will complete projects and work with various technologies and applications. Information about course objectives, contents, and resources is provided.
This document provides information about the Learning and Educational Technology (LET) minor subject studies program at the University of Oulu. It introduces the LET research unit and its focus on understanding learning through motivation, self-regulation and social aspects. The minor studies program is described as consisting of introductory courses in learning theory and technology as well as courses in designing technology-enhanced learning and educational projects. The goals of the program are also listed, which are to understand learning theories and evaluate technologies for learning, collaborate in learning communities, and recognize the role of technology in modern learning.
This document outlines the course structure and objectives for a university course on designing technology-enhanced learning (TEL). The course will introduce key concepts of TEL and guide students collaboratively in developing a prototype TEL course. It is structured around lectures, collaborative work, and assignments to design the pedagogical and technological aspects of a TEL course. Students will work in international teams using Google Docs to document their work. The goal is for students to gain skills in designing, implementing, and evaluating the use of integrated TEL systems and tools.
This document provides information about the Educational Technology minor studies program at the University of Oulu in Finland. The 25 ECTS minor involves four courses that introduce students to learning sciences, educational technology, learning theory, designing technology-enhanced learning, and completing an educational project. Students learn to identify core concepts in learning and ed tech, use technology to support learning, design tech-enhanced learning, and plan, implement and evaluate educational projects. They also learn to work efficiently in teams and reflect on their expertise in a digital portfolio. Studying involves diverse teaching methods, collaborative group work, international collaboration, and cooperation with local employers.
Today's schedule includes:
- A 09:00-10:30 lecture on introduction to learning and educational technology by Sanna Järvelä and Paul Kirschner.
- A 10:45-11:45 discussion on social media as a learning and working environment led by Jari Laru.
- Two sessions of an ICT workshop on mindmapping tools from 12:30-14:00 and 14:30-16:00 led by Jari Laru.
- Two sessions of collaborative studying and starting the first portfolio assignment from 12:30-14:00 and 14:00-16:30 led by Venla Vallivaara.
This document discusses digital portfolios and how students can use blogs and social media to create online portfolios. It explains that digital portfolios allow students to collect work over time to demonstrate skills and learning. Blogs provide a free and structured way to share assignments, media, and reflections. Setting up an educational blog allows students to make their learning visible, get feedback, and have an online presence to showcase for potential employers. The document provides examples of student blogs and asks readers to consider how to structure and design their own portfolio blog.
This document outlines a university course on learning theory and the pedagogical use of technology. The course objectives are to introduce students to theories of self-regulated learning, collaborative learning, and expertise acquisition. It also aims to explore how technology can support learning and collaboration. Students will work in groups to collaboratively write an e-book on these topics by researching, writing chapters, and holding discussions. They will be evaluated based on their participation, exam, e-book contributions, and reflective notes.
This document outlines the schedule and activities for a course on constructing a learning environment for technology-enhanced learning (TEL). It includes details on problem-based learning sessions, collaborative studying, and instructions for designing a course environment. Students will work in teams to design a course based on pedagogical and technological scripts, and present their designs on the last day of class. The course environment and overall design will be evaluated based on criteria such as clarity, functionality, and adherence to the scripts.
This document outlines an introductory course on learning and educational technology. The course objectives are to examine the role of educational technology in different learning contexts, familiarize students with theoretical foundations and concepts in the field, and learn to use and evaluate information and communications technology pedagogically. The course contents include the significance of educational technology, key concepts, research topics, expertise, and central ICT applications. Assessment is based on active participation, portfolio assignments involving reading articles and developing a digital portfolio, and technological implementation of the portfolio. The course involves lectures, workshops, collaborative activities, and developing a digital portfolio blog.
Theory, introduction to the course, 27.10.2014, Essi VuopalaEssi Vuopala
This document outlines a university course on learning theory and the pedagogical use of technology. The course will introduce students to three perspectives on learning: self-regulated learning, collaborative learning, and learning of expertise. It will examine how technology can support learning and collaborative knowledge construction. Students will study collaborative learning models and themes related to guiding and evaluating learning. They will complete group projects, write a collaborative online book, and have an oral exam to be assessed on their knowledge and participation.
Theory, introduction to the course, 27.10.2014, Essi VuopalaEssi Vuopala
This document outlines a university course on learning theory and the pedagogical use of technology. The course will introduce students to three perspectives on learning: self-regulated learning, collaborative learning, and learning of expertise. It will examine how technology can support learning and collaborative knowledge construction. Students will study collaborative learning models and themes related to guiding and evaluating learning. They will complete group assignments, produce a collaborative "science book," and be assessed through participation, an exam, and the book.
This document summarizes a study conducted in Denmark on the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in schools. The study found that while Internet access is widely used, students sometimes prioritize appearances over content in projects. ICT was found to support educational differentiation when used appropriately. School leadership was identified as the decisive factor in how ICT is implemented. The document provides recommendations for schools and municipalities to better evaluate and improve their ICT practices through a self-evaluation guide.
This document outlines an agenda and topics for a course on pedagogical decisions and scripting collaboration taking place on February 14, 2013. The schedule includes lectures and collaborative studying on topics like pedagogical models and scripting. It also discusses considerations for pedagogical scripting like describing the course, learning theory, pedagogical model, and evaluation. Students are asked to write parts of their pedagogical script and share it for feedback.
This document summarizes a presentation on navigating digital landscapes to foster creativity and innovation. It discusses trends in e-learning technologies over time, emerging technologies, pedagogical approaches like mobile learning and situated learning, the importance of digital literacies, and challenges for the future like MOOCs and skills gaps. The presentation aims to harness new media and adopt open practices to enable new forms of learning, teaching, and business models in education.
AeP PS: An update on the AeP data. ePortfolio engagement in Australian post-...ePortfolios Australia
The document summarizes the findings of a survey on ePortfolio use in Australian post-compulsory education. It finds that while ePortfolio use was still emerging in 2007, by 2010 practice was more mature and widespread. Higher education respondents saw ePortfolios as supporting student learning journeys through development and reflection. VET respondents emphasized their pragmatic uses for skills recognition and practicum experience. Implementation responsibility was increasingly shared between teaching units, IT services, and learning support across universities and VET institutions.
This document provides an orientation for students in the Master's Degree Programme in Learning, Education and Technology (LET) at the University of Oulu. It outlines the support services available to students, including personal study advisors, student tutors, and central administration. It also describes some of the academic components of the program, such as lectures on academic communication and writing, use of databases and libraries, and developing a personal study plan. Finally, it provides some practical information for students on requirements, computer accounts, and presenting original certificates.
This document provides information about an Introduction to Learning and Educational Technology course beginning on September 7, 2015. It outlines the course content which includes basic concepts of instruction, learning and technology enhanced learning. It also describes the learning outcomes which are to describe key concepts in the field, discuss issues in educational technology, use educational software and hardware, and create a digital portfolio. The course structure is presented, including weekly meetings, assignments, collaborative work, and workshops. Assessment is based on participation, assignments, and workshop exercises.
The document discusses self-regulated learning from a metacognitive perspective. It begins by introducing the presenter as a post-doc researcher studying self-regulated learning and socially shared regulation of learning. It then provides an overview of the key aspects of self-regulated learning, including: (1) task understanding, (2) goal setting and planning, (3) enacting strategies like monitoring and controlling, and (4) evaluating. The document emphasizes that self-regulated learning is an active, cyclical process whereby learners personalize their efforts to optimize cognitive, motivational and behavioral processes in pursuit of learning goals.
Self-regulated learning involves students actively monitoring and controlling their cognition, motivation, behavior, and environment in pursuit of goals. It is influenced by personal characteristics as well as social and environmental factors. Effective self-regulated learners are aware of their own strengths and weaknesses, can employ various learning strategies, and are motivated to learn. Regulation may occur individually through self-reflection, or socially through collaboration with others. Developing strong self-regulated learning skills is important for students' well-being, academic success, and ability to adapt to changing demands.
This document outlines the course objectives, content, assessment, and timeline for a course on self-regulated learning. The course aims to help students understand key concepts and theories of self-regulated learning and how to apply them in different contexts. Students will complete individual reflection assignments and participate in collaborative group work, which involves solving cases and preparing teaching sessions. The course will be assessed based on individual and group work and participation.
This document provides information about an online course on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). The course will be taught over 9 weeks by professors from the Universities of Saarland, Turku, and Oulu. It will cover three topics: scripting, motivation and emotions, and metacognition in CSCL. Students will learn about the theoretical foundations of CSCL and collaborative learning, and how to design, evaluate, and assess collaborative learning environments. The course will include orientation, readings, video lectures, team discussions, and a final exam. Students will be asked to take on discussion roles like contributor, critic, and composer to strengthen argumentation and collaboration skills.
This document outlines the agenda and activities for a learning course meeting. It includes:
1) A presentation by Essi Vuopala on her Pecha Kucha style talk
2) Working in home teams to review initial mind maps on learning and create new mind maps to identify changes
3) A discussion on how participants' understanding of learning has changed during the course
It also provides information on assessment, which is based on active participation, completing portfolio assignments that require reflection on learning, and tasks from ICT workshops. Portfolio Assignment 6 involves reflecting on changes in understanding of learning and the role of collaboration.
The document outlines the agenda for a collaborative working session. It instructs participants to first form expert teams to discuss chapters they read and share key insights. They will then return to their home teams to teach what they learned. Finally, home teams will create a presentation, such as a mind map or comic strip, about the theme of four articles and publish it to their blog. The session aims to foster discussion of readings and collaboration between expert and home teams.
This document outlines the course structure and schedule for an educational technology course taking place over 6 weeks. It details the weekly schedule which includes Monday morning meetings for presentations and information sharing, individual portfolio assignments, collaborative working sessions in small groups, and hands-on ICT workshops. The timetable for the current Monday morning meeting is provided, covering educational technology in countries such as Palestine, Ghana, Thailand, Vietnam, Italy, and Indonesia. Students are assigned to write blog posts about their presentations and comment on others' posts as part of portfolio assignment 5.
This document outlines the agenda and activities for a collaborative working session. It instructs participants to first form expert teams based on book chapters they read, to discuss the main messages, important concepts, new information, and any unclear parts. They will then return to their home teams to teach one another what they learned. As a home team, they will create a mind map summarizing the key points. Finally, the document asks how important concepts from all articles can be connected and presented coherently, and provides reading materials for the next session.
This document outlines the course structure and schedule for an educational technology course taking place over 6 weeks. It includes details on weekly morning meetings for presentations and information sharing, individual portfolio assignments due each week, collaborative working sessions in small groups during various class times, hands-on ICT workshops for two groups on different days, and the timetable of topics to be covered in the morning meeting that day, including educational technology in Germany, Spain, USA, Kyrgyzstan, Iran, and Moldova. It concludes with the instructions for the fourth portfolio assignment, which involves blogging about a student's own presentation or commenting on two other interesting presentations from the morning meeting.
1) The document outlines an orientation for new students in the Communication and Orientation Studies program, including an introduction to using photo diaries as a reflection method. Students will take one photo per week over six weeks reflecting on themes like home, culture, and studies.
2) It then discusses the concept of culture and gets students to reflect on their impressions of Finnish culture so far. Academic culture is explored, emphasizing independence, integrity, and participation.
3) Finally, the document compares the academic cultures students come from to the culture of studying in Finland and the LET program, noting a focus on independent learning and ability of students to question teachers.
This document outlines the agenda and activities for a collaborative working session on personal learning environments (PLEs). It instructs participants to:
1. Form expert teams to discuss chapters they read and the main messages, important concepts, new insights, and unclear areas.
2. Return to their home teams to teach one another about their chapter's main message, important concepts using a mind map.
3. As a large group, discuss the important concepts found across all articles, how they are the same or different, how concepts are connected, and how to coherently present the main points.
4. Have each member read one of four research articles on PLEs to further their individual understanding.
This document outlines the course structure and schedule for an educational technology course taking place over 6 weeks. It details the various course activities including Monday morning meetings for presentations and information sharing, individual portfolio assignments, collaborative working sessions in small groups, and hands-on ICT workshops. The timetable provides the specific dates and times for each course element. It also lists the topics that will be covered in the student Pecha Kucha presentations during that morning's meeting, and gives instructions for portfolio assignment 3 regarding blogging about the presentations.
The document outlines the schedule and topics for a communication and orientation studies course. It discusses creating a personal study plan (PSP) to guide students through their degree requirements, goals and timeline. Students will continue working on their PSPs in an upcoming computer class and must present original certificates of completed studies. The PSP process involves ongoing review and revision over three years to facilitate on-time graduation.
This document outlines an introductory session on collaborative learning. It instructs participants to:
1) Form expert teams to discuss chapters they read and the main messages, important concepts, new insights, and unclear areas.
2) Return to their home teams to teach others about their chapter's main message and important concepts. They will create a collaborative concept map titled "how people learn".
3) Members will then each read one of several research articles on collaborative learning and be prepared to discuss with their group.
This document provides an introduction to technology enhanced learning. It discusses how the modern knowledge economy requires lifelong learning. It describes key findings from learning sciences, including the importance of deep conceptual understanding, connected knowledge, and collaborative learning. It also discusses motivational competence, self-regulated learning, and how technology can support deep learning and collaboration through representing knowledge concretely and allowing learners to build knowledge together. Examples are given of learning, collaboration, and technology use in the author's research and teaching.
This document outlines the course structure and schedule for an Introduction to Learning and Educational Technology course. It includes details about weekly Monday morning meetings for presentations and information sharing, individual portfolio assignments due each week, collaborative working sessions in small groups on Wednesdays and Fridays, and hands-on ICT workshops for two groups on Thursdays and Tuesdays. This particular Monday's meeting will involve pairing students into teams to prepare a Pecha Kucha presentation on educational technology in their home country, with presentations scheduled over the next few weeks. Students are also assigned a blog post describing the most important things they learned from three assigned video lectures.
This document provides guidance on reporting qualitative research results. It explains that qualitative research aims to interpret and make sense of phenomena in their natural settings by understanding people's meanings and perspectives. The main steps in qualitative research are outlined, including formulating research questions, collecting and interpreting data, and writing findings. When reporting results, the researcher must be consistent, clear, precise, and objective while connecting all aspects of the study. General guidelines recommend highlighting the original context, only reporting results for the research questions, using tables and graphs sparingly with explanation, and indicating which questions the results address. Practical tips include introducing each results section, grouping findings logically by category, and describing the method each set of results came from.
This document provides the timetable and topics for the second part of a qualitative methodology course taking place in the fall of 2015. It includes the dates and locations for weekly lectures on writing research publications, ethical issues, validity and reliability, and reporting results. It instructs students to discuss in groups what they remember from the first part of the course, what topics interest them, and to write down 3 questions they have that they hope will be addressed. It also directs students to check the course's wiki page for latest materials and information.
This document outlines an introductory course collaboration project using mind mapping, concept mapping, and the jigsaw method of learning. It discusses:
1) Students will be divided into teams to create a mind map on the concept of "Learning" and learn about the jigsaw method.
2) The jigsaw method involves students dividing into expert groups to learn about assigned readings and then returning to their original teams to share their new knowledge.
3) The document provides the course schedule and plan for collaborative working sessions, ICT workshops, and assigned readings to be divided among student teams using the jigsaw method.
This document contains the schedule and introductory information for students beginning the Master's Degree Programme in Learning, Education and Technology (LET) at the University of Oulu. It includes the timetable for course sessions during the first two weeks of the autumn 2015 semester. It also assigns students to one of two workshop groups and provides contact information for the Educational Coordinator, Karoliina Hautala, to help with any questions about practicalities of the program such as semesters, course registration, attendance, and communication policies. Students are encouraged to meet their assigned partner over coffee to get to know each other and discuss where they are from and their experiences so far in the program.
More from Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit (20)
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
How to Manage Reception Report in Odoo 17Celine George
A business may deal with both sales and purchases occasionally. They buy things from vendors and then sell them to their customers. Such dealings can be confusing at times. Because multiple clients may inquire about the same product at the same time, after purchasing those products, customers must be assigned to them. Odoo has a tool called Reception Report that can be used to complete this assignment. By enabling this, a reception report comes automatically after confirming a receipt, from which we can assign products to orders.
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
A Free 200-Page eBook ~ Brain and Mind Exercise.pptxOH TEIK BIN
(A Free eBook comprising 3 Sets of Presentation of a selection of Puzzles, Brain Teasers and Thinking Problems to exercise both the mind and the Right and Left Brain. To help keep the mind and brain fit and healthy. Good for both the young and old alike.
Answers are given for all the puzzles and problems.)
With Metta,
Bro. Oh Teik Bin 🙏🤓🤔🥰
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
1. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Introduction to Learning
and Educational
Technology
(INTRO)
2. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Today’s schedule:
Thursday 2012-09-13
08:15-09:45
KTK215
Course info
Getting to know each other
Venla Vallivaara
10:15-11:45
KTK215
Digital portfolio as a part of
Educational Technology studies
Venla Vallivaara
12:30-14:00 (group
1)
14:30-16:00 (group
2)
KTK207
ICT Workshop: Starting the digital
portfolios
Jari Laru
12:30-14:00 (group
2)
14:00-16:30 (group
1)
KTK215
Collaborative studying: ”Mapping”
your prior knowledge on Learning
and Educational Technology
Venla Vallivaara
3. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Getting to know each other:
• Pick a card that mostly describes your feelings,
expectations and goals for the educational technology
studies now at the beginning of the INTRO –course…
Team up with the students that have the same card
as you do. Introduce yourself to the other members of
your team, tell them something about your
background and explain, why did you pick this card…
4. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
5. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
6. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
7. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
8. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
9. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
10. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
11. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
12. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
13. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Objective
• The goal of the course is to examine the role of educational
technology as a part of the possibilities and demands of the
learning society in different learning contexts.
• In this course, the students familiarize themselves with the
theoretical background, core concepts, and practical applications
of learning and educational technology.
• Students become acquainted with the different constituents of
expertise, in connection with which they reflect upon their own
expertise path in a digital portfolio.
• One central goal of this course is to learn to use and evaluate
information and communications technology pedagogically.
14. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Contents
• Significance of educational technology in a learning
society
• Basic concepts related to educational technology
• Introduction to the study of learning and educational
technology: objectives, research subjects and the
theoretical framework
• Expertise and reflecting upon one’s own expertise
• Central ICT applications
15. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Learning objectives
After this course the student can
• describe the basic concepts of educational technology
• name some of the central research topics in the field of learning
and educational technology
• identify societal trends and strategic policies affecting the
research field of educational technology
• describe the central characteristics of collaborative expertise
• use core utility software and information networks and evaluate
their pedagogical usability
• plan and implement a digital portfolio in a blog environment
16. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
2012-09-13
Thursday
2012-09-14
Friday
PORTFOLIOASSIGNMENT1 2012-09-20
Thursday
2012-09-21
Friday
PORTFOLIOASSIGNMENT2
2012-09-27
Thursday
2012-09-28
Friday
PORTFOLIOASSIGNMENT3
2012-10-04
Thursday
2012-10-05
Friday
PORTFOLIOASSIGNMENT4
2012-10-12
Friday
08:15-11:45
KTK215
Course Info
09:00-11:45
KTK215
Lectures
08:15-16:00
KTK215
Students’
presentations
08:15-11:45
KTK215
Lectures
08:15-11:45
KTK215
Lectures
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
12:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
12:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
12:00-15:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
15:30-16:30
KTK207
ICT Workkshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
DIGITAL PORTFOLIO
Course structure
17. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Working methods
• Lectures
Room KTK215
• ICT Workshops / Jari Laru
Room KTK207
• Collaborative Studying / Venla Vallivaara
Room KTK215
• Portfolio Assignments 1-4
• All the slides and instructions can be found at:
http://www.oulu.fi/let/node/12243
18. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
2012-09-13
Thursday
2012-09-14
Friday
PORTFOLIOASSIGNMENT1 2012-09-20
Thursday
2012-09-21
Friday
PORTFOLIOASSIGNMENT2
2012-09-27
Thursday
2012-09-28
Friday
PORTFOLIOASSIGNMENT3
2012-10-04
Thursday
2012-10-05
Friday
PORTFOLIOASSIGNMENT4
2012-10-12
Friday
08:15-11:45
KTK215
Course Info
09:00-11:45
KTK215
Lectures
08:15-16:00
KTK215
Students’
presentations
08:15-11:45
KTK215
Lectures
08:15-11:45
KTK215
Lectures
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
12:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
12:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
12:00-15:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
15:30-16:30
KTK207
ICT Workkshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
DIGITAL PORTFOLIO
19. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Two groups for the afternoons:
2012-09-13
Thursday
08:15-11:45
KTK215
Course Info
GROUP 1
12:30-14:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
14:30-16:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
GROUP 1 STUDENTS:
Lyana, Gary, Sasha, Antonella, Asta, Polina,
Fedor, Ana, Julia, Erkkie, Päivi P-A, Petri, Jake
GROUP 2
12:30-14:00
KTK215
Collaborative
studying
14:30-16:00
KTK207
ICT Workshop
GROUP 2 STUDENTS:
Marta, Suvi, Katri, Liping, Emilia, Miquel, Olli-Pekka,
Joni, Fiza, Anna-Maaria, Hannes, Vera, Päivi E.
20. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Course assessment
• Grading: 0-5
Based on
Active participation on lectures, ICT Workshops and
collaborative studying
Portfolio assignments 1-4
Digital portfolio as a whole (content, structure and
technological implementation)
21. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Reading materials
• Sawyer, R, K. (2008). Optimising
Learning: Implications of Learning
Sciences Research.
http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40554221.pdf
• Dabbagh, N. & Kitsantas, A.
(2012). Personal Learning
Environments, social media, and
self-regulated learning: A natural
formula for connecting formal and
informal learning.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109675161100
0467
• Also other written sources should
be used when needed in portfolio
assingments
22. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
23. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
SOCIAL
MEDIA
LEARNING DIARY
FEEDS AND READERSMULTIMEDIA
CONTENTS
SOCIAL
INTERACTION
REPLACEMENT FOR A TRADITIONAL
WEBPAGE?
SIMPLE AND FREE
PUBLICITY
STRUCTURED IN
CERTAIN WAY
GROUP BLOGS
BLOGGERS’
NETWORKS
COMMENTS AND DISCUSSIONS
NEW WAYS OF EXPRESSING
YOURSELF
DIGITAL
PORTFOLIO
PERSONAL LEARNING
ENVIRONMENT (PLE)
24. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
• A collection of documents that have been chosen to
demonstrate person’s expertise, skills, learning and
development
• Portfolio is always personal and unique
(e-portfolio) means a portfolio
that contains digital documents and different kinds of
media contents.
• Usually digital portfolios are published in the internet
25. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
, which is a
record of things that the owner has done over a
period of time, and may be directly tied to learning
outcomes.
includes personal
reflection on the content and what it means for the
owner’s development.
that shows
the owner’s achievements in relation to particular
work or developmental goals.
• When portfolio is used for job applications it can be
called also a .
26. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
How can you make
your learning visible?
27. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
, and
• Contains:
– Learning assignments that are written as a text
– Embedded or linked multimedia files that you have produced
during the studies
– Reflective writings on what you have learned, thought and
discovered during your studies
– Comments from and discussion with your peers, tutors and
teachers
– Anything else you want to include to your portfolio as a
showcase of your learning and expertise
28. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
• Helps you to learn by articulating your thoughts (and discussing
them with others)
• Helps you to see the process of your learning, what you have
learned and accomplished
• Helps the teachers and other students to see your thoughts,
learning process and accomplishments
• Provides an easy way to do, ”return” and collect your learning
assignments
• Shows the potential employers your achievements and expertise
• Provides a way to show the world who you are, helps you to
create networks
• Provides a way for your relatives, friends and other interested
people to see how you are doing and what you are thinking
• Helps all interested people to see, what our studies are about
29. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
What could be the main contents of your potfolio?
Who will be the main readers (target group) of your
portfolio?
What are the main issues you want the reader to
know about you?
Do you want to include other issues besides these
studies?
– Hobbies, interests, happenings in your everyday life,
professional contents, current issues in politics…?
30. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
• provides a simple and free platform, where you can
share your thoughts, documents and media files in an
well-structured and visually pleasing form without any
specific programming or other technical special skills.
• enables an easy way to comment and discuss, refer
to other blogs or sites and embed multimedia to your
portfolio.
• can be totally public to all web users or some of the
content may be protected with a password for only
selected viewers to see.
31. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
• Posts
• Pages
• Comments
• Embeddings
• Hyperlinks
• Categories
• Tags
• Archives
• Widgets
• Feeds
32. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
http://tuumyl.wordpress.com/
http://mianmonologi.wordpress.com/
http://opemedia.mobi/blog/
33. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
• The portfolio will be evaluated by its contents
(portfolio assignments 1-4), structure, and technical
implementation.
• The evaluation of the portfolio will also considerably
affect the final grading of the course.
• Return/evaluation date 2012-12-07
– portfolio assignments 1-4 have their own return dates
• The portfolio assignments given in other courses will
be evaluated as a part of those courses.
34. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
How could you structure your blog?
– What could be the main categories?
– How about tags?
– Should there be some ’permanent’
pages?
How about the visual look of your
portfolio?
35. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Questions?
Comments?
After the lunch at 12:30
Group 1
will meet in room KTK207 with Jari
Group 2
will continue in this room with Venla
All the today’s materials can be found in:
oulu.fi/let/
slideshare.net/LEToulu
Please Note!
Introduction to Learning
and Educational Technology
continues tomorrow at 09:00 in KTK215
with lecture by Prof. Sanna Järvelä
36. Venla Vallivaara
LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
University of Oulu
2012-09-13
Introduction to Learning and Educational Technology
Collaborative Studying
Thursday 2012-09-13
EXPLORING AND MAPPING YOUR PRIOR
KNOWLEDGE
OF LEARNING AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
• Form a group of 3-4 students
• Discuss:
– What comes to your mind when you think of learning and
educational technology?
– What kind of things have you experienced, read, seen or heard?
– What could be the most important concepts in that field?
– How could they relate to each other?
Create a concept map / mind map as a team
• You can write or draw
• Use different colors, fonts, shapes, arrows etc.
• Do it in your own style :)
Editor's Notes
Huom! Läsnäololista!
Jaetaan aikataulu.
Tummemmalla sinisellä olevat kaikille yhteisiä ja vaalemmat koskee vain toista ryhmistä
Käydään (opettajien suunnitelmaa hyväksikäyttäen) kohta kohdalta läpi, mitä tämä tarkoittaa ja milloin mitäkin tapahtuu…
Huom! Sannan luento alkaa huomenna klo 9
Onko jollain kokemusta portfoliotyöskentelystä? Millaisia portfolioita on tehty?
There are many ways to categorise portfolios, this is one way that can be used for e-portfolios (in Wikipedia)