This session offers the results of a study that tests the assertion that the online dissemination of theses has a positive impact on the research profile of the institution. Based on a combination of primary and secondary research, with some fascinating statistical comparative information, the study outlines the types of metrics an institution may use to measure the impact of its corpus of digitised dissertations and examines how these metrics may be generated. It is the result of a year-long study undertaken with the London School of Economics which focuses on the outcomes achieved through its programme of theses digitisation, disseminated simultaneously through its institutional repository and through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database (PDTD). Results achieved by the LSE will be compared with metrics gathered globally by ProQuest via its PDTD. The session will be of interest to all librarians and academics involved in the use of digitised theses as a research resource, digitisation projects (retrospective or ongoing) and university rankings.
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
Open Access, Journal, Institutional Repository and BeyondLeslie Chan
Presentation at the Scholarly Communication Retreat, St. Michael's College, University of Toronto. Oct.6, 2015. This talk is a personal perspective on Open Access and what I see as the key impetus for engaging in open access practices. I highlight some recent innovations, both in terms of tools and modes of collaborative research enabled by OA. I also highlight recent developments in financial models in support of OA journal and monograph publishing.
Software Repositories for Research-- An Environmental ScanMicah Altman
This document provides a summary of the state of software curation based on an environmental scan of research software repositories and related practices. The summary finds:
1) There are no comprehensive indices of software archives and orders of magnitude fewer software archives than data archives. Institutional repositories offer little functionality for software archiving.
2) Very few funders have policies addressing software curation. There is little available advice for researchers who wish to curate, cite, and preserve software.
3) Substantial reproducibility failures continue to be reported due to a lack of software preservation. In summary, software curation looks a lot like data curation did a decade ago, with no universal standards for citing and archiving software.
The document discusses institutional repositories and open access initiatives. It provides definitions and descriptions of institutional repositories, their benefits, challenges in setting them up, stakeholders involved, types of content and services they can offer. It also discusses enabling technologies for institutional repositories, including open source software like DSpace, EPrints, Fedora, Greenstone and proprietary options like Archimede and CDSware.
NISO (a non-profit standards organization) is working on several projects related to scholarly information including recommended practices around access and license indicators, open discovery initiatives, journal transfers between publishers, and altmetrics standards. The presentation provides an overview of NISO's mission and processes for developing standards as well as details on the specific projects. Membership in working groups for each project involves representatives from libraries, publishers, and other organizations.
This document discusses open access for academics in the humanities and social sciences. It defines open access as making research and teaching resources freely available online without paywalls by self-archiving in repositories or publishing in open access journals. The benefits of open access include increasing the reach, impact and citations of research as well as meeting many funders' requirements. It describes different types of open access repositories and materials that can be archived, and highlights issues like copyright and promoting open access outputs.
This session offers the results of a study that tests the assertion that the online dissemination of theses has a positive impact on the research profile of the institution. Based on a combination of primary and secondary research, with some fascinating statistical comparative information, the study outlines the types of metrics an institution may use to measure the impact of its corpus of digitised dissertations and examines how these metrics may be generated. It is the result of a year-long study undertaken with the London School of Economics which focuses on the outcomes achieved through its programme of theses digitisation, disseminated simultaneously through its institutional repository and through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database (PDTD). Results achieved by the LSE will be compared with metrics gathered globally by ProQuest via its PDTD. The session will be of interest to all librarians and academics involved in the use of digitised theses as a research resource, digitisation projects (retrospective or ongoing) and university rankings.
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
Open Access, Journal, Institutional Repository and BeyondLeslie Chan
Presentation at the Scholarly Communication Retreat, St. Michael's College, University of Toronto. Oct.6, 2015. This talk is a personal perspective on Open Access and what I see as the key impetus for engaging in open access practices. I highlight some recent innovations, both in terms of tools and modes of collaborative research enabled by OA. I also highlight recent developments in financial models in support of OA journal and monograph publishing.
Software Repositories for Research-- An Environmental ScanMicah Altman
This document provides a summary of the state of software curation based on an environmental scan of research software repositories and related practices. The summary finds:
1) There are no comprehensive indices of software archives and orders of magnitude fewer software archives than data archives. Institutional repositories offer little functionality for software archiving.
2) Very few funders have policies addressing software curation. There is little available advice for researchers who wish to curate, cite, and preserve software.
3) Substantial reproducibility failures continue to be reported due to a lack of software preservation. In summary, software curation looks a lot like data curation did a decade ago, with no universal standards for citing and archiving software.
The document discusses institutional repositories and open access initiatives. It provides definitions and descriptions of institutional repositories, their benefits, challenges in setting them up, stakeholders involved, types of content and services they can offer. It also discusses enabling technologies for institutional repositories, including open source software like DSpace, EPrints, Fedora, Greenstone and proprietary options like Archimede and CDSware.
NISO (a non-profit standards organization) is working on several projects related to scholarly information including recommended practices around access and license indicators, open discovery initiatives, journal transfers between publishers, and altmetrics standards. The presentation provides an overview of NISO's mission and processes for developing standards as well as details on the specific projects. Membership in working groups for each project involves representatives from libraries, publishers, and other organizations.
This document discusses open access for academics in the humanities and social sciences. It defines open access as making research and teaching resources freely available online without paywalls by self-archiving in repositories or publishing in open access journals. The benefits of open access include increasing the reach, impact and citations of research as well as meeting many funders' requirements. It describes different types of open access repositories and materials that can be archived, and highlights issues like copyright and promoting open access outputs.
This document discusses open access resources and the open access movement. It begins by explaining that most research is publicly funded but published in expensive journals, making the results inaccessible to most. The open access movement aims to make all research findings available to society. It describes various definitions and initiatives to promote open access, such as allowing authors to self-archive works in institutional repositories and publish in open access journals. Examples are given of important open access resources and publishers like DOAJ, DOAB, PLOS, and BioMed Central. The conclusion states that open access maximizes the visibility and impact of research.
The document discusses open access publishing options, policies, and best practices. It begins with definitions of open access and describes the conventional publication cycle versus open access models. It outlines the green road of self-archiving and gold road of open access journals. It discusses policies from ETH Zurich, Switzerland, and funders like SNSF regarding open access mandates and compliance options. It notes challenges in transitioning to more open access publishing.
Introduction to the Directory of Open Access journalsIna Smith
The document provides an introduction and overview of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It discusses what the DOAJ is, defines open access, and outlines the mission and goals of promoting open access scholarly journals. It also describes the application and evaluation process for journals to be included in the DOAJ, and lists the required information journals must provide, such as editorial details, aims and scope, peer review process, and digital archiving policies.
This document discusses open access and author's rights. It defines open access as providing unrestricted access to scholarly works online. There are different types of open access like green OA which allows authors to self-archive works and gold OA which are works published in fully open access journals. Open access benefits authors through increased visibility, citations and reuse of works. The document outlines funder open access policies like NIH and ways authors can take control of their copyright like amending publishing agreements to retain more rights to self-archive and reuse works. It promotes the use of the university's institutional repository IDEALS to make works openly available.
This document provides an introduction to open access resources for participants. It begins with welcoming the participants and laying out the structure of the paper. The paper will discuss the meaning and definitions of open access resources, their importance and types, the open access movement, the role of librarians, advantages, and conclusions. It introduces how the internet is transforming libraries and the emergence of electronic documents. Open access resources are knowledge resources made freely available online without subscription fees or access charges.
1) The document discusses how ORCID identifiers could help research university libraries more efficiently track faculty publications and link them to individual authors.
2) Currently, libraries manually search article sources and link 80% of publications to authors, but 20% require manual work, which is expensive and time-consuming. ORCID identifiers assigned to each author could automatically link publications.
3) ORCID adoption would start with new submissions requiring identifiers and then link past publications retrospectively at low cost by leveraging involvement of multiple stakeholders.
The document discusses open access literature and journals. It defines open access as online, free of charge literature without copyright or licensing restrictions. Open access journals do not charge readers or institutions for access. They cover their costs through article processing fees, advertising, or subsidies. The document lists several open access journal publishers and databases. It also discusses Indian open access biomedical journals and databases like IndMED and MedKnow. Finally, it provides a list of 73 open access library and information science journals collected from sources like DOAJ, PubMed, and SciELO.
Libraries, collections, technology: presented at Pennylvania State University...lisld
Library collections are changing in a network environment. This presentation considers how collections are being reconfigured, it looks at research support services, and it explores the shift from the purchased/licensed collection to the facilitated collection.
Learn about the University of Tennessee's open repository, Trace, and what it means for your publications. Topics include compliance with public access policies, theses and dissertations, and green Open Access.
Presented at the International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) Web Archiving Week, University of London, 16 June 2017.
Web archiving has become imperative to ensure that our digital heritage does not disappear forever, yet many institutions have not begun this work. In addition, archived websites are not easily discoverable, which severely limits their use. To address this challenge, OCLC Research has established the OCLC Research Library Partnership Web Archiving Metadata Working Group to develop a data dictionary that will be compatible with library and archives standards. Three reports on this project are available in July 2017, focused on metadata best practices guidelines, user needs and behaviors, and evaluation of web archiving tools.
More information: oc.lc/wam
Contact: Jackie Dooley, dooleyj@oclc.org
Open Access & Open Access to Research Articles Act for the Academic Senate at UIS. Covering mostly background information on Open Access and Institutional Repository at the Univ of Illinois with some basic information on the Open Access to Information Act in Illinois. (A more complete presentation with additional information on the Act to follow)
General criteria for high quality open access journalsIna Smith
Access the recording at http://webinar.assaf.org.za/playback/presentation/0.9.0/playback.html?meetingId=64bc87cc9da0731f5d8fc426bf700e593aeddd92-1479448454255
The document summarizes key points about MLA citation style from the 8th edition of the MLA Handbook. It discusses citing sources to give credit, show research, allow verification, and join scholarly conversation. Sources should be cited using a "container concept" identifying author, title, publisher, date. The MLA Style Center provides additional online support for MLA style. Citation is presented as both a rhetorical strategy and collegial gesture to help readers access sources. The goal is clear communication through documentation.
Advocating Open Access: Before, during and after HEFCENick Sheppard
Since “self-archiving” of research outputs was first mooted in the mid-1990s, initiatives towards “green” Open Access (OA) across the sector have met with generally limited success and coverage in institutional and subject repositories is generally cited at around 20-30%. However, since the Finch report in 2012 combined with OA policies from RCUK, also in 2012, and HEFCE the following year, there is little doubt that a tipping point of awareness has been reached. This session will aim to contextualise the HEFCE policy in the broader history of Open Access and present a case study of a non-research intensive University and how the repository manager has sought to liaise with academic support services in order to facilitate knowledge exchange across the University. - See more at: http://www.cilip.org.uk/events/open-access-advocacy#sthash.9YqReHt0.dpuf
Gary Price, MIT Program on Information ScienceMicah Altman
This document discusses maximizing the use of open web resources in libraries. It argues that libraries should better utilize free and openly available web content for research and users. However, curating and selecting quality resources from the vast amount on the open web presents challenges including the volume of content, lack of metadata, scalability, and ephemeral nature of some resources. The document outlines potential workflows for discovering, ingesting, reviewing, archiving, and sharing open web resources and suggests tools that can help with curation tasks. It also discusses the types of materials that could be curated from the open web like reports, datasets, digital collections, and videos.
This document summarizes scholarly communication and e-journals. It defines scholarly communication as the process by which academic content is generated, reviewed, disseminated and built upon. E-journals are described as journals available electronically over the internet or on CD-ROM. The benefits of e-journals include speed of publication and distribution, unlimited access, portability, and ability to link to other resources. E-journals are now overtaking print journals due to factors like cost reductions and user expectations changing with technology. However, issues still include the exponential rise in prices of some journals and licensing restrictions on electronic access.
This document provides an overview of resources and information for research, including search strategies, evaluating sources, and referencing. It discusses library databases for research, such as IEEE Xplore and Web of Science, and summarizes tips for effective searching. Guidelines are presented for literature reviews, managing references using RefWorks, and evaluating information quality. Contact information is included for librarian assistance.
The document summarizes key aspects of MLA style guidelines from the 8th edition handbook. It explains that MLA now takes a logic-based approach rather than rule-based for citations. It reviews why citations are used and introduces the "container concept" for organizing source information. The document also provides examples of citing different source types and emphasizes that the goal of documentation is clear communication for readers.
This document provides information about resources and skills for research at Middlesex University. It discusses search strategies, obtaining and evaluating information, referencing, and literature reviews. It also describes various library databases, citation management tools, and other resources available through the university library. Tips are provided on refining searches, managing search results, and evaluating information sources. Contact information is included for librarian assistance.
This document summarizes a panel discussion on succession planning and lessons learned from new depository coordinators. The panelists discussed their experiences transitioning into the role of depository coordinator. They emphasized the importance of planning ahead, capturing institutional knowledge, and identifying resources and allies to help with the transition. Recommendations included sharing important documents and projects, establishing an orientation plan, developing succession plans, preserving tacit knowledge, taking advantage of technology, managing changes in leadership, keeping leadership informed, and asking questions. The panelists stressed that no two situations are the same and highlighted the value of resources like listservs, conferences, and blogging to help new coordinators learn and grow in their roles.
1. This document discusses initiatives to support South African scholarly journals in 2015-2016, including auditing journal titles, implementing digital object identifiers (DOIs), allocating online ISSNs, promoting researcher IDs, developing a wiki on scholarly publishing, reviewing licensing and preservation strategies, and piloting an online journal management system.
2. A landscape analysis in 2015 found over 300 accredited journal titles, with 58 indexed on SciELO SA and 146 being open access. Various initiatives are underway to increase online presence, indexing, and use of identifiers like DOIs and ISSNs.
3. Projects include training webinars on topics like Creative Commons licensing and ORCID IDs, and piloting Open Journal Systems software for three
1. This document discusses initiatives to support South African scholarly journals in 2015-2016, including auditing journal titles, implementing DOIs, allocating ISSNs, promoting ORCIDs, developing a wiki on publishing, reviewing licensing and preservation, and piloting an online journal management system.
2. It provides data on the South African journal landscape, finding 303 accredited titles, 58 in SciELO, 146 open access, and various levels of indexing. Initiatives are outlined to promote DOIs, online ISSNs, and ORCIDs for authors.
3. Webinars and online forms will be used to increase awareness of topics like creative commons licensing, digital preservation with Portico, and using the Open
This document discusses open access resources and the open access movement. It begins by explaining that most research is publicly funded but published in expensive journals, making the results inaccessible to most. The open access movement aims to make all research findings available to society. It describes various definitions and initiatives to promote open access, such as allowing authors to self-archive works in institutional repositories and publish in open access journals. Examples are given of important open access resources and publishers like DOAJ, DOAB, PLOS, and BioMed Central. The conclusion states that open access maximizes the visibility and impact of research.
The document discusses open access publishing options, policies, and best practices. It begins with definitions of open access and describes the conventional publication cycle versus open access models. It outlines the green road of self-archiving and gold road of open access journals. It discusses policies from ETH Zurich, Switzerland, and funders like SNSF regarding open access mandates and compliance options. It notes challenges in transitioning to more open access publishing.
Introduction to the Directory of Open Access journalsIna Smith
The document provides an introduction and overview of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It discusses what the DOAJ is, defines open access, and outlines the mission and goals of promoting open access scholarly journals. It also describes the application and evaluation process for journals to be included in the DOAJ, and lists the required information journals must provide, such as editorial details, aims and scope, peer review process, and digital archiving policies.
This document discusses open access and author's rights. It defines open access as providing unrestricted access to scholarly works online. There are different types of open access like green OA which allows authors to self-archive works and gold OA which are works published in fully open access journals. Open access benefits authors through increased visibility, citations and reuse of works. The document outlines funder open access policies like NIH and ways authors can take control of their copyright like amending publishing agreements to retain more rights to self-archive and reuse works. It promotes the use of the university's institutional repository IDEALS to make works openly available.
This document provides an introduction to open access resources for participants. It begins with welcoming the participants and laying out the structure of the paper. The paper will discuss the meaning and definitions of open access resources, their importance and types, the open access movement, the role of librarians, advantages, and conclusions. It introduces how the internet is transforming libraries and the emergence of electronic documents. Open access resources are knowledge resources made freely available online without subscription fees or access charges.
1) The document discusses how ORCID identifiers could help research university libraries more efficiently track faculty publications and link them to individual authors.
2) Currently, libraries manually search article sources and link 80% of publications to authors, but 20% require manual work, which is expensive and time-consuming. ORCID identifiers assigned to each author could automatically link publications.
3) ORCID adoption would start with new submissions requiring identifiers and then link past publications retrospectively at low cost by leveraging involvement of multiple stakeholders.
The document discusses open access literature and journals. It defines open access as online, free of charge literature without copyright or licensing restrictions. Open access journals do not charge readers or institutions for access. They cover their costs through article processing fees, advertising, or subsidies. The document lists several open access journal publishers and databases. It also discusses Indian open access biomedical journals and databases like IndMED and MedKnow. Finally, it provides a list of 73 open access library and information science journals collected from sources like DOAJ, PubMed, and SciELO.
Libraries, collections, technology: presented at Pennylvania State University...lisld
Library collections are changing in a network environment. This presentation considers how collections are being reconfigured, it looks at research support services, and it explores the shift from the purchased/licensed collection to the facilitated collection.
Learn about the University of Tennessee's open repository, Trace, and what it means for your publications. Topics include compliance with public access policies, theses and dissertations, and green Open Access.
Presented at the International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) Web Archiving Week, University of London, 16 June 2017.
Web archiving has become imperative to ensure that our digital heritage does not disappear forever, yet many institutions have not begun this work. In addition, archived websites are not easily discoverable, which severely limits their use. To address this challenge, OCLC Research has established the OCLC Research Library Partnership Web Archiving Metadata Working Group to develop a data dictionary that will be compatible with library and archives standards. Three reports on this project are available in July 2017, focused on metadata best practices guidelines, user needs and behaviors, and evaluation of web archiving tools.
More information: oc.lc/wam
Contact: Jackie Dooley, dooleyj@oclc.org
Open Access & Open Access to Research Articles Act for the Academic Senate at UIS. Covering mostly background information on Open Access and Institutional Repository at the Univ of Illinois with some basic information on the Open Access to Information Act in Illinois. (A more complete presentation with additional information on the Act to follow)
General criteria for high quality open access journalsIna Smith
Access the recording at http://webinar.assaf.org.za/playback/presentation/0.9.0/playback.html?meetingId=64bc87cc9da0731f5d8fc426bf700e593aeddd92-1479448454255
The document summarizes key points about MLA citation style from the 8th edition of the MLA Handbook. It discusses citing sources to give credit, show research, allow verification, and join scholarly conversation. Sources should be cited using a "container concept" identifying author, title, publisher, date. The MLA Style Center provides additional online support for MLA style. Citation is presented as both a rhetorical strategy and collegial gesture to help readers access sources. The goal is clear communication through documentation.
Advocating Open Access: Before, during and after HEFCENick Sheppard
Since “self-archiving” of research outputs was first mooted in the mid-1990s, initiatives towards “green” Open Access (OA) across the sector have met with generally limited success and coverage in institutional and subject repositories is generally cited at around 20-30%. However, since the Finch report in 2012 combined with OA policies from RCUK, also in 2012, and HEFCE the following year, there is little doubt that a tipping point of awareness has been reached. This session will aim to contextualise the HEFCE policy in the broader history of Open Access and present a case study of a non-research intensive University and how the repository manager has sought to liaise with academic support services in order to facilitate knowledge exchange across the University. - See more at: http://www.cilip.org.uk/events/open-access-advocacy#sthash.9YqReHt0.dpuf
Gary Price, MIT Program on Information ScienceMicah Altman
This document discusses maximizing the use of open web resources in libraries. It argues that libraries should better utilize free and openly available web content for research and users. However, curating and selecting quality resources from the vast amount on the open web presents challenges including the volume of content, lack of metadata, scalability, and ephemeral nature of some resources. The document outlines potential workflows for discovering, ingesting, reviewing, archiving, and sharing open web resources and suggests tools that can help with curation tasks. It also discusses the types of materials that could be curated from the open web like reports, datasets, digital collections, and videos.
This document summarizes scholarly communication and e-journals. It defines scholarly communication as the process by which academic content is generated, reviewed, disseminated and built upon. E-journals are described as journals available electronically over the internet or on CD-ROM. The benefits of e-journals include speed of publication and distribution, unlimited access, portability, and ability to link to other resources. E-journals are now overtaking print journals due to factors like cost reductions and user expectations changing with technology. However, issues still include the exponential rise in prices of some journals and licensing restrictions on electronic access.
This document provides an overview of resources and information for research, including search strategies, evaluating sources, and referencing. It discusses library databases for research, such as IEEE Xplore and Web of Science, and summarizes tips for effective searching. Guidelines are presented for literature reviews, managing references using RefWorks, and evaluating information quality. Contact information is included for librarian assistance.
The document summarizes key aspects of MLA style guidelines from the 8th edition handbook. It explains that MLA now takes a logic-based approach rather than rule-based for citations. It reviews why citations are used and introduces the "container concept" for organizing source information. The document also provides examples of citing different source types and emphasizes that the goal of documentation is clear communication for readers.
This document provides information about resources and skills for research at Middlesex University. It discusses search strategies, obtaining and evaluating information, referencing, and literature reviews. It also describes various library databases, citation management tools, and other resources available through the university library. Tips are provided on refining searches, managing search results, and evaluating information sources. Contact information is included for librarian assistance.
This document summarizes a panel discussion on succession planning and lessons learned from new depository coordinators. The panelists discussed their experiences transitioning into the role of depository coordinator. They emphasized the importance of planning ahead, capturing institutional knowledge, and identifying resources and allies to help with the transition. Recommendations included sharing important documents and projects, establishing an orientation plan, developing succession plans, preserving tacit knowledge, taking advantage of technology, managing changes in leadership, keeping leadership informed, and asking questions. The panelists stressed that no two situations are the same and highlighted the value of resources like listservs, conferences, and blogging to help new coordinators learn and grow in their roles.
1. This document discusses initiatives to support South African scholarly journals in 2015-2016, including auditing journal titles, implementing digital object identifiers (DOIs), allocating online ISSNs, promoting researcher IDs, developing a wiki on scholarly publishing, reviewing licensing and preservation strategies, and piloting an online journal management system.
2. A landscape analysis in 2015 found over 300 accredited journal titles, with 58 indexed on SciELO SA and 146 being open access. Various initiatives are underway to increase online presence, indexing, and use of identifiers like DOIs and ISSNs.
3. Projects include training webinars on topics like Creative Commons licensing and ORCID IDs, and piloting Open Journal Systems software for three
1. This document discusses initiatives to support South African scholarly journals in 2015-2016, including auditing journal titles, implementing DOIs, allocating ISSNs, promoting ORCIDs, developing a wiki on publishing, reviewing licensing and preservation, and piloting an online journal management system.
2. It provides data on the South African journal landscape, finding 303 accredited titles, 58 in SciELO, 146 open access, and various levels of indexing. Initiatives are outlined to promote DOIs, online ISSNs, and ORCIDs for authors.
3. Webinars and online forms will be used to increase awareness of topics like creative commons licensing, digital preservation with Portico, and using the Open
1. This document discusses initiatives to support South African scholarly journals in 2015-2016, including auditing journal titles, implementing digital object identifiers (DOIs), and allocating online ISSNs.
2. It provides an overview of the South African scholarly journal landscape, noting that 303 journals are DHET-accredited, 58 are indexed on SciELO SA, and 146 are open access.
3. The document outlines plans to promote the use of DOIs, online ISSNs, and ORCID researcher IDs among South African journals to improve discoverability, attribution, and assessment of impact. It also discusses developing a wiki, webinars, and piloting an open journal system to support best practices.
This presentation discusses open access, institutional repositories, and altmetrics. Open access refers to freely available research online. Institutional repositories allow researchers to self-archive publications, increasing their visibility and impact. Altmetrics are new metrics that measure attention research receives online through social media and other platforms, providing a more comprehensive view of scholarly impact. The presentation encourages researchers to communicate work online and include digital object identifiers to help capture altmetrics.
Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)Ina Smith
This document provides an overview of using Open Journal Systems (OJS) for online journal management. OJS is an open source journal management and publishing system that allows journals to accept submissions, peer review, edit and publish articles online. It has benefits such as being locally controlled, providing online submission and management tools, and building capacity for journals with fewer resources. The document discusses implementation of OJS, training, and continued support available through organizations like ASSAf and PKP. It also covers topics like registering with indexes, rights management, analytics and measuring impact.
This document provides an overview of using Open Journal Systems (OJS) for online journal management. OJS is an open source journal management and publishing system that allows journals to accept submissions, peer review, edit and publish articles online. It has benefits such as being locally controlled, providing online submission and management tools, and building capacity for journals with fewer resources. The document discusses implementing and customizing OJS, ensuring academic integrity of journals, registering with indexes, and measuring journal impact.
This document summarizes an information session about City Research Online (CRO), the institutional repository at City University London. CRO uses Symplectic Elements for research information management and Eprints for an open access repository, and provides services like archiving theses and working papers. The session discussed open access policies and infrastructure, lessons learned like automating metadata and differentiating systems, and future plans like research data management and author profiling services. Attendees were encouraged to ask questions about CRO's role in advocating for open access at City University London.
The document provides a history of open access from 1969 to 2009. It discusses key events like the creation of ARPANET and early online databases in the 1970s, the development of email and the internet in the 1980s, the launch of the first open access journals and repositories in the 1990s, and the creation of Creative Commons in 2002. It also defines open access, discusses issues around open access credibility and costs, and outlines advantages of open access for institutions, authors, and journals.
Nicole Nogoy at the G3 Workshop: Open Access Publishing - What you need to KnowGigaScience, BGI Hong Kong
This document discusses open access publishing and some of the key challenges. It notes that while open access publishing removes barriers to accessing and sharing scientific research, major publishers currently control the market and charge high subscription fees. This puts strain on library budgets. The document outlines initiatives to increase open access, such as university and funder mandates, and notes that open access journals can have high impact. However, challenges remain around copyright and the ability to fully text mine and reuse content. More advocacy and support for open access is needed to address these issues.
This document summarizes community initiatives in journal preservation led by Jisc and other organizations. It discusses key questions around journal management, current initiatives that address these questions, and challenges around long-term access. Initiatives described include KnowledgeBase+, usage statistics tools, archiving programs like UK LOCKSS Alliance and Portico, and policies around sustainable access to electronic journals. The document advocates for a proposed "SafeNet" distributed digital archive that would provide post-cancellation access and help libraries efficiently manage digital collections.
Introduction to the Directory of Open Access JournalsIna Smith
The document provides an overview of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It discusses what the DOAJ is, what open access is, the mission of the DOAJ to curate and provide access to high quality open access journals, and the required information and evaluation process for journals to be included in the DOAJ. Key requirements for inclusion are that journals must be fully open access, peer reviewed, and provide specific metadata and policies around publishing, licensing, and archiving.
This document discusses open access to scholarly literature. It defines open access as digital content that is free of charge and most copyright/licensing restrictions. Open access aims to spread knowledge and allow ideas to build upon one another. Benefits include increased visibility, usage, and impact of research. Strategies to achieve open access include self-archiving in repositories and publishing in open access journals. Many funders and institutions now mandate open access policies. Alternate metrics also aim to assess research in ways other than journal impact factors.
Open Research comprises open access to the broad range of research outputs, from journal articles and the underlying data to protocols, results (including negative results), software and tools. Open Research increases inclusivity and collaboration, improves transparency and reproducibility of research and underpins research integrity.
This workshop focuses on the benefits of practicing open research for you as a researcher, to improve discoverability and maximise access to your work and to raise your professional profile.
By the end of the session you will:
• Have an understanding of the principles of Open Research
• Understand open licences and how they apply to publications, data and software
• Be able to apply key tools and techniques to increase the visibility of yourself and your research, including repositories, ORCID, social media and altmetrics
• Describe the different ways of making research and data available open access
A webinar presented by the DOAJ Ambassador for Southern Africa, Ina Smith, on getting to know DOAJ, how to submit a quality application and some explanations around Best Practice and DOAJ's expectations in this area.
Introduction to the Directory of Open Access JournalsIna Smith
This document provides an overview of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It discusses what the DOAJ is, what open access is, the mission of the DOAJ, and the required information and evaluation process for inclusion in the DOAJ. Key points include that the DOAJ is a database of open access journals that aims to be the starting point for information searches, open access means content is freely available without charge to users, and the evaluation process verifies that journals meet standards for inclusion.
This presentation in intended to introduce Open Access (OA); the OA movement; OA advantages for authors, institutions and society; OA business models and publishing in OA; important tools for research and publishing; and other ‘open’ initiatives.
The document discusses moving from open access to open data in scientific publishing. It outlines the social contract of science which involves validation, dissemination and further development of research. When these principles are not followed, it can constitute scientific malpractice by various stakeholders. The presentation advocates for data journals as an incentive that can help recognize data as a valid research output and encourage data sharing by providing metrics like citations. It provides details on what constitutes a data paper and reviews factors like peer review that are important for data journals to be successful.
- Research infrastructures enable better science by building a common vision, allowing scientists to seamlessly share resources, applying economies of scale, and constructing new resources from combinations of shared ones.
- Open science means broader access to publicly funded research results through open access publications, data, software, methodologies, and more. This helps build on previous work, avoid duplication, speed innovation, and involve citizens.
- The European Commission's open access mandate requires beneficiaries to make publications and underlying data openly available, with possible sanctions for non-compliance like payment suspensions. Research infrastructures and open science publishing aim to increase transparency, reproducibility, and reuse of research outputs.
Has anyone seen my data? Incentivising #opendata sharing with altmetricsNick Sheppard
As an important component of the scholarly record, research data, software and code are increasingly managed as research outputs in their own right, though are not typically subject to peer review.
In line with the broader ‘open research’ movement there is a growing impetus for datasets, software and code to be curated in repositories, openly available wherever possible subject to relevant legal and ethical constraints.
Data repositories such as Figshare, Dryad and Zenodo routinely allocate DOIs for deposited data while many universities in the UK also allocate and mint DOIs in their nascent institutionally based data repositories through Datacite which means they will be automatically tracked by altmetric.com in the same way as journal articles.
While the repository infrastructure continues to develop and there are pockets of best practice, data sharing and reuse is not yet fully established across UK HE. Reward mechanisms are immature and data citation, for example, is limited and not easy to track. Clarivate Analytics’ Data Citation Index coverage of UK based repositories is still relatively low and, as a subscription based product, is not widely accessible. COUNTER compliant downloads can be derived from IRUSdata-UK (beta) which currently tracks 27 UK based institutional data repositories.
Altmetrics therefore offers a low barrier method to track engagement with datasets and, in lieu of a more formal process, might be regarded as a type of informal peer review. We have undertaken a preliminary analysis of repositories that participate in IRUSdata-UK (beta) using it as a source of DOIs to run against the altmetric.com API to discover to what extent research data, software and code is being shared.
This talk will present these preliminary results and explore how and why datasets are being shared across the various platforms tracked by altmetric.com and potential barriers. It will consider how data repository managers can encourage and facilitate data sharing through social media networks, blogs and “data journalism” and will draw on the Research Data Management (RDM) Engagement Award at the University of Leeds which is exploring linking RDM with the Open Science movement via the Wikimedia suite of tools. What does the altmetric data currently tell us about how research data is being linked to this global platform
Similar to Internationalising South African Scholarly Journals (20)
LIASA Pre-conference Workshop 3: Mobile LiteracyKidsintheCloud
Presented on 30 Sept. 2019 at the Durban International Conference Centre, SA.
Mobile Literacy in South Africa is an ecosystem of projects and initiatives by a variety of stakeholders that promote, support and enable access to literature and literacy projects on mobile devices, especially mobile phones, in the context of informal education. Mobile literacy is also known by the abbreviation mLiteracy.
This document provides guidance on designing effective posters. It discusses key considerations like understanding the purpose and audience of the poster, using appropriate file formats and resolutions for print vs. digital, including essential elements like a title and contact information, choosing high quality images and fonts that fit the genre, and using colors and layout techniques to attract attention and guide the eye. The document emphasizes keeping the design clear and focused by limiting elements and using techniques like contrast to make important information stand out.
Design like a pro! Poster design for librariansKidsintheCloud
This photo album from March 23rd and 30th, 2019 documents a poster design workshop titled "Design like a pro! Poster Design with". The album likely contains photos from the workshop showing participants working on poster designs and examples of posters designed during the event.
This document discusses collaboration in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It defines the 4IR as technological developments that blur physical, digital, and biological spheres by integrating cyber-physical systems, the internet of things, big data, cloud computing, robotics, and artificial intelligence. The 4IR is evolving exponentially and will significantly impact work, education, services and leisure. The document emphasizes the importance of collaboration for addressing challenges of the 4IR and provides examples of collaborative tools and makerspaces in libraries that can facilitate collaboration in this new digital age.
Introduction: Virtual Events and Live StreamingKidsintheCloud
The document discusses hosting virtual events and streaming workshops on February 20-21, 2019. The workshops will cover topics like using online tools like BigBlueButton, planning and hosting online events, presentation skills for webinars, and live streaming. Attendees will gain hands-on experience through practical examples and exercises.
The document provides information and resources for students preparing for life after high school. It discusses choosing subjects in high school, creating a CV, finding career advice through online resources and libraries. Options after school include finding jobs, apprenticeships, learnerships, internships, attending universities or TVET colleges. Financial support options like NSFAS and bursaries are mentioned. The document encourages lifelong learning and provides links to online courses. It ends by assigning students a group project to develop a business plan and presentation.
The document provides information to help students choose career paths after school. It discusses choosing the right high school subjects based on passion, interest, capabilities and personality. It also discusses creating a curriculum vitae and becoming a digital citizen. The document then provides information on various options for career paths like finding jobs, apprenticeships, learnerships, internships, universities, TVET colleges, private training and online courses. It also discusses financial support options and preparing for interviews. Finally, it provides a task for students to work in groups to create a business plan and presentation for their own business idea to address a need in their community.
Ina Smith and Annamarie Goosen run In the Cloud, which provides digital citizenship training and workshops for kids, teachers, and librarians in South Africa. Their goals are to empower people to become lifelong learners, stay up to date on technology trends, and pass on their digital knowledge to others. They define digital citizenship as including digital access, literacy, etiquette, laws, rights and responsibilities, and security. Since 2000, they have held many workshops for schools, libraries, and conferences to teach digital skills. Going forward, they plan to get accreditation to offer more courses starting in 2018 and continue partnering with schools and libraries.
Reflections on my LIASA Librarian of the Year 2016 AwardKidsintheCloud
Ina Smith served as the Library and Information Association of South Africa's Librarian of the Year in 2016. She maintained a blog documenting her experiences and activities during her term, including visits to schools in Mbazwana, KwaZulu-Natal and Hindle High in Delft, Western Cape. She also worked on the African Open Science Open Data Platform.
The document discusses the African Open Science Platform (AOSP) project, which aims to support the development of open science in Africa. Key points:
- AOSP is a 3-year pilot project starting in 2016 that is funded by the South African Department of Science and Technology to establish an open data platform and coordinate open science initiatives across Africa.
- It is being implemented by the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) in partnership with organizations like the Association of African Universities (AAU) and UbuntuNet Alliance.
- The project involves several work packages, including establishing open data policies, research data infrastructure, training programs, and a roadmap for African research data.
- JK
The document discusses various factors to consider when choosing a career path, including personal passions, interests, capabilities and personality. It also addresses choosing appropriate high school subjects aligned with one's career choice, and options for tertiary education institutions including universities, colleges, private colleges and training programs. The document provides information on funding sources for tertiary education like bursaries, scholarships and financial aid, as well as recommendations for building work experience during tertiary studies through volunteering, internships and part-time jobs. Students are encouraged to utilize career counseling services available on campuses.
ViewShift: Hassle-free Dynamic Policy Enforcement for Every Data LakeWalaa Eldin Moustafa
Dynamic policy enforcement is becoming an increasingly important topic in today’s world where data privacy and compliance is a top priority for companies, individuals, and regulators alike. In these slides, we discuss how LinkedIn implements a powerful dynamic policy enforcement engine, called ViewShift, and integrates it within its data lake. We show the query engine architecture and how catalog implementations can automatically route table resolutions to compliance-enforcing SQL views. Such views have a set of very interesting properties: (1) They are auto-generated from declarative data annotations. (2) They respect user-level consent and preferences (3) They are context-aware, encoding a different set of transformations for different use cases (4) They are portable; while the SQL logic is only implemented in one SQL dialect, it is accessible in all engines.
#SQL #Views #Privacy #Compliance #DataLake
Predictably Improve Your B2B Tech Company's Performance by Leveraging DataKiwi Creative
Harness the power of AI-backed reports, benchmarking and data analysis to predict trends and detect anomalies in your marketing efforts.
Peter Caputa, CEO at Databox, reveals how you can discover the strategies and tools to increase your growth rate (and margins!).
From metrics to track to data habits to pick up, enhance your reporting for powerful insights to improve your B2B tech company's marketing.
- - -
This is the webinar recording from the June 2024 HubSpot User Group (HUG) for B2B Technology USA.
Watch the video recording at https://youtu.be/5vjwGfPN9lw
Sign up for future HUG events at https://events.hubspot.com/b2b-technology-usa/
State of Artificial intelligence Report 2023kuntobimo2016
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a multidisciplinary field of science and engineering whose goal is to create intelligent machines.
We believe that AI will be a force multiplier on technological progress in our increasingly digital, data-driven world. This is because everything around us today, ranging from culture to consumer products, is a product of intelligence.
The State of AI Report is now in its sixth year. Consider this report as a compilation of the most interesting things we’ve seen with a goal of triggering an informed conversation about the state of AI and its implication for the future.
We consider the following key dimensions in our report:
Research: Technology breakthroughs and their capabilities.
Industry: Areas of commercial application for AI and its business impact.
Politics: Regulation of AI, its economic implications and the evolving geopolitics of AI.
Safety: Identifying and mitigating catastrophic risks that highly-capable future AI systems could pose to us.
Predictions: What we believe will happen in the next 12 months and a 2022 performance review to keep us honest.
The Building Blocks of QuestDB, a Time Series Databasejavier ramirez
Talk Delivered at Valencia Codes Meetup 2024-06.
Traditionally, databases have treated timestamps just as another data type. However, when performing real-time analytics, timestamps should be first class citizens and we need rich time semantics to get the most out of our data. We also need to deal with ever growing datasets while keeping performant, which is as fun as it sounds.
It is no wonder time-series databases are now more popular than ever before. Join me in this session to learn about the internal architecture and building blocks of QuestDB, an open source time-series database designed for speed. We will also review a history of some of the changes we have gone over the past two years to deal with late and unordered data, non-blocking writes, read-replicas, or faster batch ingestion.
Beyond the Basics of A/B Tests: Highly Innovative Experimentation Tactics You...Aggregage
This webinar will explore cutting-edge, less familiar but powerful experimentation methodologies which address well-known limitations of standard A/B Testing. Designed for data and product leaders, this session aims to inspire the embrace of innovative approaches and provide insights into the frontiers of experimentation!
4th Modern Marketing Reckoner by MMA Global India & Group M: 60+ experts on W...Social Samosa
The Modern Marketing Reckoner (MMR) is a comprehensive resource packed with POVs from 60+ industry leaders on how AI is transforming the 4 key pillars of marketing – product, place, price and promotions.
Analysis insight about a Flyball dog competition team's performanceroli9797
Insight of my analysis about a Flyball dog competition team's last year performance. Find more: https://github.com/rolandnagy-ds/flyball_race_analysis/tree/main
Global Situational Awareness of A.I. and where its headedvikram sood
You can see the future first in San Francisco.
Over the past year, the talk of the town has shifted from $10 billion compute clusters to $100 billion clusters to trillion-dollar clusters. Every six months another zero is added to the boardroom plans. Behind the scenes, there’s a fierce scramble to secure every power contract still available for the rest of the decade, every voltage transformer that can possibly be procured. American big business is gearing up to pour trillions of dollars into a long-unseen mobilization of American industrial might. By the end of the decade, American electricity production will have grown tens of percent; from the shale fields of Pennsylvania to the solar farms of Nevada, hundreds of millions of GPUs will hum.
The AGI race has begun. We are building machines that can think and reason. By 2025/26, these machines will outpace college graduates. By the end of the decade, they will be smarter than you or I; we will have superintelligence, in the true sense of the word. Along the way, national security forces not seen in half a century will be un-leashed, and before long, The Project will be on. If we’re lucky, we’ll be in an all-out race with the CCP; if we’re unlucky, an all-out war.
Everyone is now talking about AI, but few have the faintest glimmer of what is about to hit them. Nvidia analysts still think 2024 might be close to the peak. Mainstream pundits are stuck on the wilful blindness of “it’s just predicting the next word”. They see only hype and business-as-usual; at most they entertain another internet-scale technological change.
Before long, the world will wake up. But right now, there are perhaps a few hundred people, most of them in San Francisco and the AI labs, that have situational awareness. Through whatever peculiar forces of fate, I have found myself amongst them. A few years ago, these people were derided as crazy—but they trusted the trendlines, which allowed them to correctly predict the AI advances of the past few years. Whether these people are also right about the next few years remains to be seen. But these are very smart people—the smartest people I have ever met—and they are the ones building this technology. Perhaps they will be an odd footnote in history, or perhaps they will go down in history like Szilard and Oppenheimer and Teller. If they are seeing the future even close to correctly, we are in for a wild ride.
Let me tell you what we see.
2. Agenda
• What is an “international” journal?
• Criteria an international journal should adhere
to
• Becoming an international journal
2
3. Rationale behind Scholarly Journals
• Platform to share new research/discoveries,
encourage dialogue - solutions
• Permanent & transparent forum for
presentation, scrutiny, discussion of research
• Peer-reviewed/refereed
• Journal & articles become part of scientific
record – new research build on existing
research
3
5. Tim Berners-Lee (8 June 1955 - )
5
English Computer Scientist & Inventor of WWW
6. World Wide Web (WWW)
6
"The World Wide Web (WWW) project aims to
allow all links to be made to any information
anywhere. [...] The WWW project was started to
allow high energy physicists to share data, news,
and documentation. We are very interested in
spreading the web to other areas, and having
gateway servers for other data. Collaborators
welcome!"
—from Tim Berners-Lee's first message (1991)
7. Tim Berners-Lee 25 years later (2014)
7
“Very soon, millions more sensors, appliances and other
devices large and small will take the web to new places.
The potential excites me and concerns me at the same
time -- that makes the web worth our ongoing
stewardship. We must build and defend it now so that
those who come to it later will be able to create things
that we cannot ourselves imagine.
I believe that the future of the web is under threat from
some governments that may abuse their powers, some
businesses that may try to undermine the open market,
and from criminal activity. ”
12. Open Access Online Scholarly Journals
“Scholars need the means to launch a new
generation of journals committed to open access,
and to help existing journals that elect to make the
transition to open access…”
Budapest Open Access Initiative, 2002
12
13. Open Journal Systems (OJS)
• Journal management & publishing system, web site – all in
one
• Licensed as Open Source Software (OS)
• Developed by Public Knowledge Project (PKP) & Simon
Fraser University (Canada)
• Community of developers
• Download and install on local server https://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs/
• Version 3.0 in August/September 2016
13
15. Benefits of OJS
• Installed locally and locally controlled
• Editors configure requirements, sections, review process
• Online submission and management of all content
• Central archive – documentation, communication etc
• Comprehensive indexing of journal content
• Plugins (additional tools)
• Email notifications and commenting options
• Builds capacity, reduces dependency
• Allows for flexible publishing frequency
15
18. ASSAf Approach to Internationalisation
• Peer-review of journals according to disciplines
• SciELO SA & WoS
• Analysis of 6 DHET approved indexes
• Compared criteria
• Listed and categorized criteria
18
19. Information to Identify Journal (1)
19
• Journal title & alternative titles
• Web presence (incl. web address)
• Online journal management system (OAI-PMH
compliant) for record-keeping
• Key journal abbreviation registered internationally
• Discipline/s
• Title owner & mailing address
• Publisher – publishing, peer review management,
business development and production
20. Information to Identify Journal (2)
20
• Journal description
• Journal history
• Focus & Scope
• Journal format (online and/or print)
• Open access/subscription
• Print ISSN/Online ISSN
http://www.nlsa.ac.za/index.php/bibsa/isn-agency
• Publication frequency/scheduling – no interruptions
• Journal sections
21. Articles - Technical Criteria (1)
• File format: pdf, html, epub, xml (data sharing, transport,
availability – see http://pkp-udev.lib.sfu.ca/)
• Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) ·
• ORCIDs
• Page numbers
• Embargoes
• Date accepted/reviewed/published
• Author-Publisher agreement
21
22. Articles - Technical Criteria (2)
• Linked data (Cited-by-Linking): emails, references, etc.
• Audit trail for individual articles (article history)
• Statistics on articles: % accepted/ rejected/ published etc
• Articles contain title, abstract, keyword/s in English
• Bibliographical references according to international
standards
• Metadata assigned to articles according to international
standards
22
23. Articles - Technical Criteria (3)
• Author affiliations clear
• Digital preservation e.g. LOCKSS, Portico
23
24. Articles – Content (1)
• Original research
• Ongoing stimulus for further research · Comparability with
leading articles/journals in discipline
• High quality scholarly content
• Focus on local/regional kind of issues
• Accompanying data sets available
• Submitted articles subjected to double-blind peer-review
process
24
25. Articles – Content (2)
• 75% of contributions beyond single institution
• Adequate number of articles per annum
• Good sample of work done in country/discipline
• Additional scholarly features
• Suitable publication of errata
• Suitable approach to article retractions
• Good presentation, layout, style, copyright, interventions
25
26. Articles – Content (3)
• Submitted articles subjected to double-blind peer-review
process
• Plagiarism-check of individual articles, and reports archived
26
27. Sustainability
• Article Processing Charges (APCs)/Other
• Sponsors
• Payment procedure and information
• Advertisements
• Expenses: Proofreader, Copy-editor, Layout Editor, Printing,
Postage
• Publishing costs: hosting server & back-up’s, IT support,
article identifiers, digital preservation costs, domain name
subscriptions, branding, additional tools
27
28. Visibility & Impact
• Full text searchable online
• Crawled by Google
• Indexing in international indexes (e.g. DOAJ)
• Impact Factor (IF)
• Journal equivalents for benchmarking
• Metadata level & OAI-PMH compliancy
• Bibliometrics: usage, downloads, social media sharing,
citations and other statistics
28
31. Policies & Statements (2)
• Errata Policy
• Copyright Policy (incl. Publishing Rights)
• Licensing Policy
• Peer-review Policy (incl. number of weeks)
• Comments Policy
• Advertisement Policy
• Digital Preservation Strategy
• Open Access Policy (incl. crawling allowed by harvesters)
31
32. DOAJ Recommended OA Policy
32
Law, Democracy & Development is an Open Access
journal which means that all content is freely available
without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are
allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search,
or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any
other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission
from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance
with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition
of Open Access.
36. Academic Integrity (1)
36
• Researchers, journals should take ownership of their
academic identity & integrity on the web – be pro-active
• Setup alerts and know who cites your work and in which
context it is used
• Assign good quality metadata to OA research so that
Google will return quality research at the top of Google
listing
37. Academic Integrity (2)
37
• Conduct Google searches for your own
research/name/journal/articles, and see where it has
been mentioned
• Know what is being researched in your field
• Take action if needed
39. 39
• Google Scholar Metrics
• Criteria:
http://scholar.google.co.za/intl/en/scholar/metrics.html#
inclusion
• Google Scholar Profile
• Register:
https://scholar.google.co.za/intl/en/scholar/citations.ht
ml
• Google Web Site registration
• Gmail & Google Search Console
• https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/submit-
url?pli=1
Registering for Indexing (2)
40. 40
Registering for Indexing (3)
• Discipline specific indexes
• E.g. Music: Rilm Abstracts; The Music Index; Sabinet
Online; African Journals OnLine
• E.g. Aquatic Science: Agris; ASFA; Aquatic Biology;
Aquaculture & Fisheries Resources; BIOBASE; BIOSIS;
Fish & Fisheries Worldwide; Journal Citation Reports;
Science Citation Index Expanded; Zoological Record
• Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
• https://doaj.org/application/new
• SHERPA RoMEO
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php
41. SA Scholarly Journals indexed in indexes
41
Results from 2017
Index Removed 2017 Added 2017 Total 2017
SCIMago 65 11 77
Scopus 54 26 105
WoS 5 0 60
+38
-14
12
SciELO SA 0 0 65
DHET 3 5 275
Norwegian
Level 2
0 0 0
DOAJ 12 13 63
IBSS 6 11 47
48. Measuring journal impact
• OJS System Statistics
• Google Scholar Metrics
• Google Scholar Profile
• Google Analytics or Piwik
• Alternative metrics – link to Science Open
• Piwik
Often a distinction is made between local and international, with a perception that international is better, and more rewarding. For example: What makes a journal such as Nature international, and a journal such as Potchefstoom Electronic Law Journal less international, or not?
But today it has become a business more than anything else
The history of scientific journals dates from 1665, when the French Journal des sçavans and the English Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society first began systematically publishing research results.
More and more journals started publishing, and South Africa also joined, with the oldest SA journal
Publishers printed journals at a high cost, and distributed it far and wide via slow mail. With the risk associated, delays in delivery, copies getting lost in the mail. And once it ended up on the shelves of libraries, the copy was restricted to one user at a time, also in danger of getting lost. But the benefit – at least the library had something tangible and expected to be permanent in hand – something it paid for, which covered the costs.
And then came the Internet, and Prof Tim Berners-Lee and his team introducing the World Wide Wevb – the pasrt of the Internet that contains web pages with actual content.
His announcement in 1991 was
Nobody could have expected how much the Internet would indeed grow
It also opened up the opportunity for publishers to change their approaches to share research quicker, and wider, but instead of the costs expecting to going down, it went the other way, regardless of the fact that publishers ended up with huge savings in terms of printing costs and distribution costs. It lead to initiatives opposing the way publishers go about doing business, exploiting the very researchers dependent on existing research to continue their own research, but also the tax payer, business people, health workers, and more, trying to find answers to problems faced. Those who could not afford paying the exorbitant prizes were simply excluded, creating and even a greater divide between developing and developed countries.
Share a few slides to demonstrate just how much publishers have become under scrutiny for exploiting the hard work by researchers, to benefit themselves financially, losing focus of what a scholarly article or journal is really expected to be about.
There are especially 5 big publishing companies that publish more than 50 percent of research papers. And as academic publishers continue to reap huge profits, libraries continue to grow broke. Even more so the libraries from developing countries, who have always been struggling to pay in dollars and pounds. It is not clear exactly how much South African libraries spend on subscription databases in order to have access to research, but we are aware of a few libraries which had to cancel subscriptions to major databases, simply because they cannot afford access anymore, and because of inflation, the weak rand, budgets being cut and many more.
Not only do publishers benefit from subscription fees, but they also benefit from huge amounts paid by researchers in order to get articles published, paying APCs. According to this JISC study, Elsevier generates more revenue from both subscriptions and APCs than any other publisher.
And to see exactly how much money, maybe the following will give you an idea: On the 13th of Oct Peter Suber from Harvard Univ tweeted a link to an article sharing the annual salaries of the prominent CEO’s in publishing. Elsevier CEO once again game out at the top earning a salary of 14.2 $ a year …. I know SA tax money contributes a meniscal amount to his salary, but still …. If more and more societies and universities all over the world mad the change and published their own journals, making the transition to move away from these publishers exploiting us, we could have – by now – saved a lot of money and invested the monies in far better ways. But now we haven’t, because all over the world there is an inhealthy dependency on impact factors and being “international”.
Negotiations between universities and other leaders in research were also not successful, with the most recent news: Eight German researchers have announced their resignation from the editorial and advisory boards of a handful of Elsevier’s journals since last Thursday (October 12) to show support for German research institutions as they attempt to establish a new, nationwide licensing agreement with the Dutch publishing giant.
“It's a symbolic gesture—obviously, scientists could be replaced on editorial boards,” says Wolfgang Marquardt, an engineer and the chairman of the Jülich Research Center in Germany. Marquardt is stepping down from the editorial boards of three Elsevier journals—Computers and Chemical Engineering, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, and Chemical Engineering Science. “I think it’s important to show that the science community is not happy with the way the negotiations went.”
Others who have stepped down include Marino Zerial of the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Jörg Raisch at the Technical University of Berlin, and Anton Möslang of the Karhlsrule Institute of Technology.
What do SA libraries, and SA researchers do to demonstrate that they are not happy with the way things go.
I would like to share – from an ASSAf perspective – how your journal can become more international, and have a bigger impact on research and change out there. With the beginning of the Open Access movement in 2002, referred to as the Budapest Open Access Initiative in 2002, the need for a way to find alternatives were expressed. It was said that …..
Using open source towards internationalisation
Journal articles - content · 75% of contributions beyond single institution · · Adequate number of articles per annum · Good sample of work done in country/discipline · · Additional scholarly features · Suitable publication of errata · Suitable approach to article retractions · Good presentation, layout, style, copyright, interventions · · Submitted articles subjected to double-blind peer-review process · Plagiarism-check of individual articles, and reports archived ·
Journal Visibility & Impact · Full text searchable online · Crawled by Google · Indexing in international indexes (e.g. DOAJ) · Impact Factor (IF) · Journal equivalents for benchmarking · Metadata level & OAI-PMH compliancy · Bibliometrics: usage, downloads, social media sharing, citations and other statistics · Open Access policy available on SHERPA/RoMEO · Listed in index for software platform e.g. PKP Index (for journals using OJS)