Interest payments on the national debt will be the fastest growing part of the federal budget. Learn more about the relationship between interest rates and debt.
The national debt is more than an abstract concept for the government to worry about. It affects you and your family. This paper explains how and the need to fix the debt.
This document provides information about the national debt of the United States from an organization called "Fix the Debt". It discusses that the current national debt is over $13 trillion and is projected to continue rising without action. It outlines some of the main causes of the debt as well as the effects, including higher costs of living and reduced ability to respond to future crises. It argues that reforms are needed to entitlement programs, taxes, and spending to put the debt on a sustainable long-term path.
A strong state of the union will require a strong approach to addressing high and rising national debt. Instead of ignoring the problem, our leaders must confront the situation and find ways to finance the future responsibly. Here’s a look at the State of the Debt.
The latest official budget and economic forecast for the next decade from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), shows national debt rising well past historical norms and warns of serious consequences. Here are the key figures and what they mean.
The US national debt originated from government spending exceeding revenue in a given year. This includes response to economic crises like the 2008 financial crisis and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which increased debt levels. Mandatory spending like social security makes up over half the budget and is difficult to cut. Without tax increases or strong economic growth, it will be challenging to reduce the deficit and debt. China is currently the largest foreign creditor to the US, holding around $1 trillion of US debt.
At 78 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), federal debt held by the public is now at its highest level since shortly after World War II. If current laws generally remained unchanged, CBO projects, growing budget deficits would boost that debt sharply over the next 30 years; it would approach 100 percent of GDP by the end of the next decade and 152 percent by 2048. That amount would be the highest in the nation’s history by far. The prospect of large and growing debt poses substantial risks for the nation and presents policymakers with significant challenges.
The national debt is more than an abstract concept for the government to worry about. It affects you and your family. This paper explains how and the need to fix the debt.
This document provides information about the national debt of the United States from an organization called "Fix the Debt". It discusses that the current national debt is over $13 trillion and is projected to continue rising without action. It outlines some of the main causes of the debt as well as the effects, including higher costs of living and reduced ability to respond to future crises. It argues that reforms are needed to entitlement programs, taxes, and spending to put the debt on a sustainable long-term path.
A strong state of the union will require a strong approach to addressing high and rising national debt. Instead of ignoring the problem, our leaders must confront the situation and find ways to finance the future responsibly. Here’s a look at the State of the Debt.
The latest official budget and economic forecast for the next decade from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), shows national debt rising well past historical norms and warns of serious consequences. Here are the key figures and what they mean.
The US national debt originated from government spending exceeding revenue in a given year. This includes response to economic crises like the 2008 financial crisis and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which increased debt levels. Mandatory spending like social security makes up over half the budget and is difficult to cut. Without tax increases or strong economic growth, it will be challenging to reduce the deficit and debt. China is currently the largest foreign creditor to the US, holding around $1 trillion of US debt.
At 78 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), federal debt held by the public is now at its highest level since shortly after World War II. If current laws generally remained unchanged, CBO projects, growing budget deficits would boost that debt sharply over the next 30 years; it would approach 100 percent of GDP by the end of the next decade and 152 percent by 2048. That amount would be the highest in the nation’s history by far. The prospect of large and growing debt poses substantial risks for the nation and presents policymakers with significant challenges.
This document summarizes Phillip L. Swagel's presentation to the National Association for Business Economics on March 23, 2021 about the Congressional Budget Office's 2021 long-term budget outlook. It projects that growing deficits will drive federal debt held by the public to over 200% of GDP by 2051. Net interest costs are projected to account for most of the growth in total deficits in the last two decades. Individual income tax increases are projected to account for most of the rise in total revenues relative to GDP through 2051.
The document summarizes common myths about the national debt and provides facts to address each myth in 1-3 concise sentences. It discusses that while deficits are smaller than during the recession, the debt will still grow substantially without action. It also notes that the longer action is delayed, the greater cuts or tax increases will need to be. Additionally, gradual deficit reduction can help the economy rather than hurt it, and past plans have protected vulnerable groups. The debt issues also cannot be solved solely by cutting waste, taxing wealthier Americans more, or relying on economic growth alone.
This presentation discusses the upcoming Federal Budget for the government of Canada. The presentation will look at the following areas:
1. Taxation
2. Program Spending
3. OAS
4. Deficits
5. Debt
6. Structural deficits
7. Raising Taxes
8. What if scenarios
We debunk several common myths about the national debt. Like deficits are falling; there is no harm in waiting; deficit reduction will harm the most vulnerable; and the debt can be fixed by cutting waste, fraud or foreign aid.
The document discusses the growing federal debt in the United States and its implications for younger generations. It states that total federal debt is expected to grow from $5.8 trillion in 2008 to over $11 trillion by 2019, increasing from 41% of GDP to 82% of GDP. By 2050, total debt is projected to reach 320% of GDP and 750% of GDP by 2083. This growing debt from programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will have to be paid back through tax increases, spending cuts, inflation, or debt repudiation. The document warns that repaying this debt will significantly reduce the quality of life for younger generations by delaying major life milestones like home ownership, marriage, and family starting
Budget deal does not change long term us fiscal outlookQNB Group
The US budget deal reached in late 2013 increases discretionary spending marginally over 2014-2015 but does not address rising mandatory spending or the long-term fiscal challenges. While avoiding another government shutdown, the budget deal is unlikely to significantly impact weak economic growth or change the long-term fiscal outlook according to QNB Group. As entitlement programs are projected to rise significantly, reducing future deficits will require tackling health and social security costs not addressed in the current budget agreement.
Under current law, the Congressional Budget Office projects that deficits will increase over the next few years and remain above the 50-year average through 2028. Revenues are expected to rise as a percentage of GDP due to scheduled tax changes and economic growth, but spending on Social Security and Medicare will also increase, pushing up mandatory outlays. As a result, federal debt held by the public is projected to rise from 78% of GDP in 2018 to 96% by 2028, which would be the highest since 1946. An alternative scenario in which current policies are maintained could result in debt reaching 105% of GDP by 2028.
CBO projects that federal revenues will increase by 3 percent of GDP over the next 30 years. Real bracket creep—when people’s income rises faster than the tax brackets and other elements of the tax system—accounts for about half of that increase.
Phillip L. Swagel presents an overview of the 2021 long-term budget outlook to the Conference Board on May 20, 2021. The presentation discusses CBO projections that show growing deficits driving federal debt held by the public to unprecedented levels over 30 years, reaching over 200% of GDP by 2051. Net interest payments account for most growth in total deficits in later decades. Faster economic and productivity growth could reduce debt levels compared to current projections of slower potential GDP growth.
The document discusses national debt and deficits. It notes that the US national debt was $5.6 trillion in 1999 and $12.8 trillion in 2010. It explains that debt is the accumulation of yearly deficits and surpluses, with deficits added to the debt and surpluses reducing it. The document also discusses "pork barrel" spending projects by Congress and debates around taxation and proportional versus progressive tax systems.
The next President will need to confront a number of budgetary challenges and will likely sign into law many federal tax and spending changes. Yet too often, election campaigns are about telling voters what they want to hear rather than what they need to know. To separate fiction from reality, the new Fiscal FactChecker series will monitor the 2016 Presidential campaign on an ongoing basis. To start with, we have identified 16 myths that may come up during the campaign.
A straight, broad highway to building wealth for middle and working class fam...AEI
Presented by Edward Pinto at the Wealth Building Home Loan press briefing held in conjunction with the 2014 American Mortgage Conference sponsored by the North Carolina Bankers Association.
With interest rates rising, the debt ceiling looming once again, and high-profile issues like tax reform on the agenda, politicians in Washington are finding it harder to ignore the high and rising national debt. However, instead of addressing the issue openly and honestly, too many are resorting to myths to muddy the waters. We confront some of the most common myths with the facts.
Phillip L. Swagel presented CBO's updated budget and economic projections to J.P. Morgan's Virtual Investor Meeting on July 20, 2021. According to the projections, primary deficits will hover around 2% of GDP through 2029 and increase to 3% thereafter. Despite low interest rates through 2023, net interest costs will rise from 1.3% of GDP in 2024 to 2.7% in 2031. The projected deficit for 2021 increased by a third due to recently enacted legislation, while projected cumulative deficits for 2022-2031 were largely unchanged. Federal debt is projected to reach 106% of GDP by 2031, matching the previous peak in 1946.
Heritage Foundation economist Bill Beach explores how federal policies are undermining the American Dream in a presentation to the Naples Committee for Heritage on February 17, 2010.
Presentation by Christina Hawley Anthony, Chief of the Projections Unit in CBO’s Budget Analysis Division, to the National Conference of State Legislatures Base Camp.
The document summarizes projections from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on revenues, spending, deficits, and debt under current law and the President's budget. It shows that:
- Revenues have averaged 17.4% of GDP over the past 50 years while spending has averaged 20.1%, leading to growing budget deficits and debt levels.
- Under current policies, debt is projected to continue rising to over 80% of GDP by 2025 according to CBO and OMB estimates.
- The President's budget proposes new initiatives, tax cuts, and health care and other reforms to reduce deficits by around $930 billion compared to a baseline that
The document analyzes the President's FY 2016 budget. It finds that the budget would reduce deficits by about $930 billion over 10 years relative to current law, with debt remaining stable at around 73% of GDP by 2025. Spending would rise from 20.9% of GDP in 2015 to 22.2% in 2025, while revenue would rise from 17.7% to 19.7% of GDP. Deficits would remain at around 2.5% of GDP each year. However, the budget does little to reduce debt levels or slow the growth of entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare over the long run.
The document discusses various tax provisions known as "extenders" that expired at the end of 2013 and would cost $85 billion to extend for 2014 and 2015. It notes that making some of the extenders permanent, like bonus depreciation, would significantly increase the cost. The House Ways and Means Committee approved extending some provisions permanently at a 10-year cost of $310 billion, while the Senate Finance Committee approved a two-year extension costing $84 billion. Extending the provisions without paying for them would increase budget deficits and debt levels. The document lists various policy options that could help pay for any extension of the expired tax provisions.
This document summarizes Phillip L. Swagel's presentation to the National Association for Business Economics on March 23, 2021 about the Congressional Budget Office's 2021 long-term budget outlook. It projects that growing deficits will drive federal debt held by the public to over 200% of GDP by 2051. Net interest costs are projected to account for most of the growth in total deficits in the last two decades. Individual income tax increases are projected to account for most of the rise in total revenues relative to GDP through 2051.
The document summarizes common myths about the national debt and provides facts to address each myth in 1-3 concise sentences. It discusses that while deficits are smaller than during the recession, the debt will still grow substantially without action. It also notes that the longer action is delayed, the greater cuts or tax increases will need to be. Additionally, gradual deficit reduction can help the economy rather than hurt it, and past plans have protected vulnerable groups. The debt issues also cannot be solved solely by cutting waste, taxing wealthier Americans more, or relying on economic growth alone.
This presentation discusses the upcoming Federal Budget for the government of Canada. The presentation will look at the following areas:
1. Taxation
2. Program Spending
3. OAS
4. Deficits
5. Debt
6. Structural deficits
7. Raising Taxes
8. What if scenarios
We debunk several common myths about the national debt. Like deficits are falling; there is no harm in waiting; deficit reduction will harm the most vulnerable; and the debt can be fixed by cutting waste, fraud or foreign aid.
The document discusses the growing federal debt in the United States and its implications for younger generations. It states that total federal debt is expected to grow from $5.8 trillion in 2008 to over $11 trillion by 2019, increasing from 41% of GDP to 82% of GDP. By 2050, total debt is projected to reach 320% of GDP and 750% of GDP by 2083. This growing debt from programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will have to be paid back through tax increases, spending cuts, inflation, or debt repudiation. The document warns that repaying this debt will significantly reduce the quality of life for younger generations by delaying major life milestones like home ownership, marriage, and family starting
Budget deal does not change long term us fiscal outlookQNB Group
The US budget deal reached in late 2013 increases discretionary spending marginally over 2014-2015 but does not address rising mandatory spending or the long-term fiscal challenges. While avoiding another government shutdown, the budget deal is unlikely to significantly impact weak economic growth or change the long-term fiscal outlook according to QNB Group. As entitlement programs are projected to rise significantly, reducing future deficits will require tackling health and social security costs not addressed in the current budget agreement.
Under current law, the Congressional Budget Office projects that deficits will increase over the next few years and remain above the 50-year average through 2028. Revenues are expected to rise as a percentage of GDP due to scheduled tax changes and economic growth, but spending on Social Security and Medicare will also increase, pushing up mandatory outlays. As a result, federal debt held by the public is projected to rise from 78% of GDP in 2018 to 96% by 2028, which would be the highest since 1946. An alternative scenario in which current policies are maintained could result in debt reaching 105% of GDP by 2028.
CBO projects that federal revenues will increase by 3 percent of GDP over the next 30 years. Real bracket creep—when people’s income rises faster than the tax brackets and other elements of the tax system—accounts for about half of that increase.
Phillip L. Swagel presents an overview of the 2021 long-term budget outlook to the Conference Board on May 20, 2021. The presentation discusses CBO projections that show growing deficits driving federal debt held by the public to unprecedented levels over 30 years, reaching over 200% of GDP by 2051. Net interest payments account for most growth in total deficits in later decades. Faster economic and productivity growth could reduce debt levels compared to current projections of slower potential GDP growth.
The document discusses national debt and deficits. It notes that the US national debt was $5.6 trillion in 1999 and $12.8 trillion in 2010. It explains that debt is the accumulation of yearly deficits and surpluses, with deficits added to the debt and surpluses reducing it. The document also discusses "pork barrel" spending projects by Congress and debates around taxation and proportional versus progressive tax systems.
The next President will need to confront a number of budgetary challenges and will likely sign into law many federal tax and spending changes. Yet too often, election campaigns are about telling voters what they want to hear rather than what they need to know. To separate fiction from reality, the new Fiscal FactChecker series will monitor the 2016 Presidential campaign on an ongoing basis. To start with, we have identified 16 myths that may come up during the campaign.
A straight, broad highway to building wealth for middle and working class fam...AEI
Presented by Edward Pinto at the Wealth Building Home Loan press briefing held in conjunction with the 2014 American Mortgage Conference sponsored by the North Carolina Bankers Association.
With interest rates rising, the debt ceiling looming once again, and high-profile issues like tax reform on the agenda, politicians in Washington are finding it harder to ignore the high and rising national debt. However, instead of addressing the issue openly and honestly, too many are resorting to myths to muddy the waters. We confront some of the most common myths with the facts.
Phillip L. Swagel presented CBO's updated budget and economic projections to J.P. Morgan's Virtual Investor Meeting on July 20, 2021. According to the projections, primary deficits will hover around 2% of GDP through 2029 and increase to 3% thereafter. Despite low interest rates through 2023, net interest costs will rise from 1.3% of GDP in 2024 to 2.7% in 2031. The projected deficit for 2021 increased by a third due to recently enacted legislation, while projected cumulative deficits for 2022-2031 were largely unchanged. Federal debt is projected to reach 106% of GDP by 2031, matching the previous peak in 1946.
Heritage Foundation economist Bill Beach explores how federal policies are undermining the American Dream in a presentation to the Naples Committee for Heritage on February 17, 2010.
Presentation by Christina Hawley Anthony, Chief of the Projections Unit in CBO’s Budget Analysis Division, to the National Conference of State Legislatures Base Camp.
The document summarizes projections from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on revenues, spending, deficits, and debt under current law and the President's budget. It shows that:
- Revenues have averaged 17.4% of GDP over the past 50 years while spending has averaged 20.1%, leading to growing budget deficits and debt levels.
- Under current policies, debt is projected to continue rising to over 80% of GDP by 2025 according to CBO and OMB estimates.
- The President's budget proposes new initiatives, tax cuts, and health care and other reforms to reduce deficits by around $930 billion compared to a baseline that
The document analyzes the President's FY 2016 budget. It finds that the budget would reduce deficits by about $930 billion over 10 years relative to current law, with debt remaining stable at around 73% of GDP by 2025. Spending would rise from 20.9% of GDP in 2015 to 22.2% in 2025, while revenue would rise from 17.7% to 19.7% of GDP. Deficits would remain at around 2.5% of GDP each year. However, the budget does little to reduce debt levels or slow the growth of entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare over the long run.
The document discusses various tax provisions known as "extenders" that expired at the end of 2013 and would cost $85 billion to extend for 2014 and 2015. It notes that making some of the extenders permanent, like bonus depreciation, would significantly increase the cost. The House Ways and Means Committee approved extending some provisions permanently at a 10-year cost of $310 billion, while the Senate Finance Committee approved a two-year extension costing $84 billion. Extending the provisions without paying for them would increase budget deficits and debt levels. The document lists various policy options that could help pay for any extension of the expired tax provisions.
In the coming months and years, lawmakers will face a number of important budget-related deadlines, or Fiscal Speed Bumps, that will require legislative action. These Fiscal Speed Bumps will present challenges, risks, and opportunities. Addressed irresponsibly, they could cause serious disruptions and/or add as much as $3 trillion to the debt over the next decade above what current law would allow. But if dealt with thoughtfully, they offer an opportunity to pursue reforms that would grow the economy, improve the policy landscape, and reduce the risk of an uncontrollably growing national debt.
The President's budget projects that the debt will decline as a percentage of GDP after 2021. It achieves this through tax increases, spending cuts, and economic growth from immigration reform. However, the debt levels may still be too high, and the budget relies on optimistic assumptions and claimed savings that may not occur. It includes some positive steps like responsible reforms and paying for new initiatives, but it could have gone further with entitlement reforms.
The budget conference committee will negotiate differences between the House and Senate budget resolutions to produce a unified concurrent budget resolution. The committee consists of 30 lawmakers from both chambers. They must agree on top-line spending levels, revenue estimates, and any policy directives. If approved by both chambers, the concurrent resolution establishes guidelines for subsequent appropriations bills but does not enact binding policies or law changes. The last time a budget conference produced a concurrent resolution was in 2009.
Individual income and payroll taxes cover over two-thirds of government spending. In 2015, one-eighth of the government’s spending will be financed by deficits. The top 20% of households pay almost 70% of the nation’s taxes, with the top 1% paying nearly a quarter. Tax expenditures have grown over time and now equal over a quarter of total government spending.
The statutory debt limit has been reached once again. There are better ways to enforce fiscal discipline without threatening default and its economic repercussions. This report presents ten ideas for improving the debt ceiling.
August 14 marks the 80th birthday of the Social Security program, which was established in the Social Security Act of 1935. Over the past 80 years, Social Security has provided important cash benefits and income security to seniors, survivors, individuals with disabilities, and their families – including to nearly 60 million people today. Yet Social Security is on a financially unsustainable course – and is not on track to be able to pay full benefits through its 100th birthday.
Sadly, instead of identifying solutions to prevent depletion of the trust funds, many commenters have relied on myths and half-truths to avoid having a conversation about the necessary choices. In this paper, we identify eight such myths – though there are many more
This document discusses issues with the current BCS system for determining the college football national champion and proposes moving to a 12-team playoff system instead. It notes that non-BCS teams like Boise State feel the BCS is unfair. A 12-team playoff would include the top 12 teams selected by a committee, allowing more teams a chance to compete for the national title based on their performance, not just rankings. The excitement from college football would improve if fans voiced support for changing to a playoff format.
The Complete Site Establishment Company provides a wide range of site establishment services including hoarding, fencing, lighting, welfare facilities, security, and more. Hiring Panthera offers benefits such as reduced costs, time savings, improved efficiency and coordination through a single point of contact. Testimonials from clients praise Panthera's professionalism, quality of work, health and safety standards, and customer service.
The document discusses attractions around Galway, Ireland including rolling green hills, ancient stone formations, churches, and pubs that offer something for every traveler. It highlights some prehistoric sites like stone circles, monoliths, and burial mounds dating back thousands of years such as the impressive 150-foot stone circle at Lios in Limerick from 2000 BCE. The Clayton Hotel Galway is mentioned as providing calming beauty and refreshing hospitality for travelers visiting these cultural and historic sites.
The Roman Empire reached its height under Emperor Diocletian in the late 3rd century AD, controlling territory from Britain to Egypt. Facing external threats and internal divisions, Diocletian split the empire administratively into eastern and western halves. Constantine moved the capital to Constantinople in the East. The Western Roman Empire declined due to invasions by barbarian tribes in the 5th century, culminating with the deposition of the last emperor in 476 AD. However, the Eastern Roman Empire, centered in Constantinople, continued to thrive under emperors like Justinian in the 6th century, reconquering parts of the West. It survived until the Fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman
El documento presenta un curso de historia del arte de 4 clases durante un mes que viajará por el mundo de los museos, artistas, movimientos culturales y obras más reconocidas. Se proporcionan los números de teléfono y correo electrónico para realizar consultas o contrataciones sobre el curso. El documento incluye también información sobre los derechos de autor de la compañía Pupovision y el año de publicación.
This document provides information about the national debt of the United States from an organization called "Fix the Debt". It discusses that the current national debt is over $13 trillion and is projected to continue rising without action. It outlines some of the main causes of the debt as well as the effects, including higher costs of living and reduced ability to respond to future crises. It argues that reforms are needed to entitlement programs, taxes, and spending to put the debt on a sustainable long-term path.
The document summarizes information about the national debt of the United States from the organization Fix the Debt. It discusses that the national debt is over $18 trillion and growing due to spending exceeding revenue in recent decades. It also notes that the debt levels threaten economic growth and flexibility and will require action to reduce the debt through tax and spending reforms.
The Congressional Budget Office presentation discusses projections of growing US federal debt levels through 2051 if current laws do not change. Federal debt held by the public is projected to reach over 200% of GDP by 2051, the highest in US history, driven by rising budget deficits as spending grows faster than revenues. Spending increases are primarily for Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the debt as interest rates are expected to exceed economic growth in later decades.
The document provides a summary of 16 common budget myths that may come up during the 2016 US presidential campaign. It aims to fact check these myths by presenting data and analysis from nonpartisan groups like the Congressional Budget Office and Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. The myths are grouped into categories on issues like the national debt, taxes, healthcare/Social Security, and proposed "easy fixes". For each myth, the summary counters arguments with evidence about risks of high debt and limitations of proposals to solve budget problems through tax cuts, targeting only the wealthy, or closing only narrow loopholes.
FRB-Richmond_ unsustainable fiscal policy_ implications for monetary policyFred Kautz
Economic research suggests that high debt levels ultimately could overwhelm a central bank’s efforts to keep prices stable. This essay will argue that these outcomes should be avoided in the United States by putting fiscal policy on a sustainable path.
The document discusses the national debt of the United States, which currently stands at over $18 trillion. It explores the history of rising US debt levels and the economic effects of increasing versus consolidating the debt. Increasing debt leads to higher interest rates, less investment, and reduced GDP growth. Consolidating debt has short-term negative effects but long-term benefits like lower interest rates and more funding for programs. The document also examines threats of sovereign default and financial crises based on examples from other countries.
Government spending has been steadily increasing over the past 40 years, even when adjusted for inflation and population growth. This rising government spending has caused economic growth and standards of living to slow down, with each successive decade seeing smaller gains. If current trends continue, future government spending will dramatically outpace GDP growth and cause the national debt to reach unsustainable levels, potentially limiting prosperity for future generations. Cutting government spending is necessary to increase economic growth and standards of living going forward.
After the US dollar replaced gold, the US debt became the attention worldwide, thus the demand for the US dollar continued, furthermore the extremely low interest of the dollar. This helped the US government to borrow great amounts of debt as well as kept the creditors pleased. Due to the pandemic, the US economy retrograded because of the tax cut and unproductive rescue spending plan plus surpassing spending of the government. The rising inflation starts to increase to high levels, which certainly the government must cut back spending or its patterns, while this will lead to uncertain consequences for the long future. This paper discusses several different perspectives on the US government's sustainability as its ability to settle the debt in future, the fate of growth burdened with that debt through the neoclassical mode of growth, and also the effect of anxiety of defaults and unfunded obligations. Inversely, it explores the strength of the dollar with a low-interest rate and its sustainability worldwide. We also propose ways helping of strengthen the fiscal government position and solutions to help the economy recover in long term and to easiest the situation. In the synopsis, we propose something that could affect and shake the global market.
Ed Thomas - 2013 AFN Convention Tribal ReportErin Fogg
The document discusses federal budget problems including a large national debt and budget deficit. It shows that mandatory spending on programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security make up the majority of the budget, while discretionary domestic spending has declined significantly as a share of total costs. Proposed budget cuts primarily target non-defense discretionary programs that support many Native American programs, which are already underfunded compared to overall per capita spending. The failure of a bipartisan committee to agree on further deficit reduction triggers across-the-board sequestration cuts that disproportionately impact domestic programs like the BIA and IHS that serve Native communities.
The Case for AAA Underlying Municipal Bondsmauiwelch
This document provides an overview of the municipal bond market and makes a case for investing in bonds with underlying AAA credit ratings from states and municipalities. It notes that there is currently limited supply of bonds directly rated AAA. The strategy proposed is to create a portfolio of only AAA-rated underlying bonds to take advantage of their strong credit quality and limited supply. Key data on default rates and credit fundamentals are presented for AAA-rated states and municipalities to demonstrate the historically strong credit performance of these issues.
The State of the Union cannot be strong without a strong fiscal foundation to the economy. The era of declining deficits is coming to an end and the era of record-level debt is projected to continue indefinitely. Policymakers cannot afford to ignore the debt problem and must find ways to finance the future in a sustainable manner.
The document discusses the economic consequences of government stimulus and growing debt levels. It argues that Obama's stimulus plans increased dependence on government and debt without creating many jobs. Growing debt obligations from programs like Social Security and Medicare will cause total US debt to increase dramatically in coming decades to over 300% of GDP by 2050. Repaying this debt will require tax increases that will significantly reduce the quality of life for Americans.
The presentation summarizes the Congressional Budget Office's 2022 long-term budget outlook projections over the next 30 years. Key points include:
- Federal debt held by the public is projected to reach 185% of GDP by 2052 due to growing deficits and rising interest rates.
- Net spending on interest will account for most of the growth in total deficits in the last two decades as interest payments rise rapidly.
- Both outlays and revenues are projected to be higher than historical averages but outlays will increase faster, resulting in larger budget deficits.
Heritage economist Bill Beach's presentation on runaway government debt to a meeting of young professionals hosted by the Colorado Committee for Heritage
What happens if the us credit rating is downgraded 7.22.2021 - Kurt S. Altric...Kurt S. Altrichter
1) The US government debt level of nearly $30 trillion poses risks even though low interest rates have kept debt servicing costs low currently. The upcoming expiration of the debt ceiling raises the possibility of a downgrade in the US credit rating or a technical default.
2) A credit downgrade or hitting the debt ceiling without a resolution could negatively impact risk assets, as occurred in 2011. Investors should take a longer term view and pay attention to weakening economic fundamentals rather than just focusing on record high stock markets.
3) The options available to address the growing debt problem like raising taxes or interest rates all carry risks for either the economy, financial markets or the US dollar. The government appears backed into a corner with
The document discusses key questions around the UK's public finances in light of the 2021 budget. It notes that while the economic outlook has improved, the pandemic will likely leave lasting scars and elevated public borrowing. The Chancellor has extended many COVID support measures but only announced limited tax rises. There is debate around whether now is the right time to tackle high debt levels, as growth is the priority, but consideration of fiscal sustainability is also important. Any future deficit reduction would likely rely more on tax rises than spending cuts due to public sentiment against austerity.
Rarely has there been more uncertainty regarding the course of the public finances over the next five years. In this note we aim to answer some of the big questions for the economy in light of the 2021 budget.
Rarely has there been more uncertainty regarding the course of the public finances over the next five years. In this note we aim to answer some of the big questions for the economy in light of the 2021 budget.
Draft Proposal from the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and ReformToby Murdock
The document outlines a proposal from co-chairs to reduce the federal deficit and debt through spending cuts and tax reform. It proposes $4 trillion in deficit reduction through 2020, including $1.5 trillion from discretionary spending cuts, $733 billion from mandatory spending cuts, and $751 billion from tax reform. Specific policies include caps on discretionary spending at 2010 levels with a 1% annual cut through 2015, illustrative defense and domestic spending cuts of $100 billion each in 2015, and reforms to entitlement programs, health care, and the tax code. The goal is to reduce the deficit to 2.2% of GDP by 2015 and achieve a balanced budget by 2037.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget gave an overview of the latest COVID relief deal and how much it will boost incomes and economic growth, and discussed the proposal for $2,000 checks.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget published the only existing comprehensive study to detail and compare the fiscal cost of President Donald Trump and Vice President Joe Biden's campaign agendas. We estimate that both candidates would add trillions to the debt – but in very different ways.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released two new outlooks in september that highlight our nation's unsustainable budget trajectory over the next decade and beyond. From the federal debt reaching almost double the size of the economy by 2050, to deficits higher than in any point in modern history, CBO's report shows that our nation's fiscal outlook is much worse than estimated last year.
Slide deck from a May 11, 2020 webinar on who is buying the federal debt resulting from the COVID-19 economic relief efforts. Watch the video of the webinar at http://www.crfb.org/events/6-trillion-dollar-question-who-will-buy-our-debts.
The document discusses how population aging is contributing to slower economic growth and rising government debt in the United States. It presents a framework for Social Security reform that could increase economic growth by promoting delayed retirement, rewarding work at all ages, increasing savings, and improving the sustainability of Social Security. Key aspects of the framework include raising the retirement age while protecting vulnerable workers, basing benefits on all years of earnings rather than average lifetime earnings, and automatically enrolling workers in supplemental retirement accounts. The reform aims to boost labor supply, savings, and long-term economic growth while restoring solvency to Social Security.
This document discusses federal budget priorities and spending on children. It finds that while children represent the future and economic growth, they receive a relatively small portion of federal spending. Spending on children has declined as a share of the budget since 2010 and is projected to continue declining. It is more temporary, discretionary and lacks built-in growth compared to spending on older populations. The long-term outlook for children is especially troubling as interest on the debt is projected to surpass spending on children. Some potential solutions proposed include accounting for children more in budget projections, prioritizing children through new committees or positions, and improving policies around children's health care and dedicated revenue sources.
The document summarizes key findings from the Congressional Budget Office's April 2018 baseline report. It finds that trillion dollar deficits will return by 2020 under current policies, driven by recent tax cuts and spending increases. The growing costs of major health and retirement programs, along with rising interest costs on the debt, will cause debt levels to exceed the 50-year historical average as a share of the economy. Trillion dollar annual deficit reduction would be needed to balance the budget by 2028 or stabilize debt levels.
The document discusses various budget gimmicks that allow Congress to circumvent budget rules and create the appearance of fiscal discipline while not actually reducing deficits. It identifies 20 specific gimmicks and categorizes them into assumption gimmicks, manipulating the budget window, discretionary spending gimmicks, and other gimmicks. Examples are provided for many of the gimmicks. The overall document aims to educate about how budget rules are worked around and define technical terms.
The document summarizes a report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) that finds trillion dollar deficits will return by 2020 under current law. It notes that recent tax cuts and spending increases have increased the projected deficits substantially. The growing costs of Social Security, healthcare programs, and interest on the debt will be the main drivers of spending increases and higher deficits over the long run according to the CBO projections.
The document discusses projections from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) regarding rising US budget deficits and debt levels. It notes that deficits were projected to exceed $1 trillion per year by 2022 under prior law and have increased further due to recent tax and spending legislation. If current policies are extended indefinitely, deficits could reach $2.4 trillion by 2028 and debt could exceed 113% of GDP, posing fiscal and economic risks. Higher interest rates could also significantly increase interest costs and debt levels.
A primer with answers to all your questions about a federal government shutdown. Such as, What services are affected in a shutdown and how?, How would federal employees be affected?, Does a government shutdown save money?, and more.
The document discusses the state of the US budget and debt prior to and under the Trump administration. The key points are:
- When Trump took office, debt was at a post-WWII high of over 100% of GDP and projected to rise sharply due to tax cuts, spending increases, and entitlement growth.
- Major trust funds were projected to become insolvent in the early-to-mid 2020s, requiring cuts up to 30% to benefits.
- Tax cuts, spending increases, and making temporary policies permanent could lead to trillion dollar annual deficits by 2027 and debt exceeding 108% of GDP.
- Entitlement growth and rising interest costs will exacerbate long-term debt problems if reforms are
This document discusses dynamic scoring and tax reform. It makes three key points:
1) Tax cuts do not pay for themselves through economic growth and increased revenue. Reasonable estimates show that tax cuts generate far less than $1 in revenue for every $1 cut.
2) Smart tax reform has the potential to generate $300-400 billion in additional revenue through dynamic effects, but debt-financed tax cuts have smaller growth effects because debt discourages investment and slows long-term growth.
3) Models that estimate the largest growth effects from tax cuts generally ignore the economic costs of increased debt, instead assuming future tax increases or spending cuts will stabilize debt levels. When debt impacts are considered, revenue-neutral
This document summarizes key information about health care spending and coverage in the United States. It shows that most health spending goes to hospital care, physician services, and prescription drugs. It is financed through private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid and other payers. The US spends a higher percentage of GDP on health care than other countries. The Affordable Care Act expanded coverage through reforms like the individual mandate, Medicaid expansion and subsidies. Repealing the ACA could increase the number of uninsured by over 20 million and add $150-1.75 trillion to the federal deficit over 10 years. Partial repeal options could also have significant costs depending on the specific provisions changed or delayed.
This document from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) analyzes and compares the fiscal impact of tax and spending proposals from Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. It finds that under current policies, debt is projected to rise to 127% of GDP by 2026. Clinton's proposals could increase debt to between 87-140% of GDP, while Trump's could increase debt to between 90-150% of GDP. To stabilize or reduce debt levels, the candidates' plans would require substantial tax increases, spending cuts, or higher than projected economic growth.
Slides from June 30, 2016 Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget webinar on the June 2016 paper "Promises and Price Tags: A Fiscal Guide to the 2016 Election." Watch the video at http://www.crfb.org/events/watch-promises-and-price-tags-fiscal-guide-2016-election.
A comprehensive fiscal analysis of the policies put forward by presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It shows how each would affect the federal budget and national debt. See more at http://crfb.org/.
karnataka housing board schemes . all schemesnarinav14
The Karnataka government, along with the central government’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), offers various housing schemes to cater to the diverse needs of citizens across the state. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the major housing schemes available in the Karnataka housing board for both urban and rural areas in 2024.
Presentation by Rebecca Sachs and Joshua Varcie, analysts in CBO’s Health Analysis Division, at the 13th Annual Conference of the American Society of Health Economists.
How To Cultivate Community Affinity Throughout The Generosity JourneyAggregage
This session will dive into how to create rich generosity experiences that foster long-lasting relationships. You’ll walk away with actionable insights to redefine how you engage with your supporters — emphasizing trust, engagement, and community!
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed online journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socio-economic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
Presentation by Julie Topoleski, CBO’s Director of Labor, Income Security, and Long-Term Analysis, at the 16th Annual Meeting of the OECD Working Party of Parliamentary Budget Officials and Independent Fiscal Institutions.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
Bharat Mata - History of Indian culture.pdfBharat Mata
Bharat Mata Channel is an initiative towards keeping the culture of this country alive. Our effort is to spread the knowledge of Indian history, culture, religion and Vedas to the masses.
The Antyodaya Saral Haryana Portal is a pioneering initiative by the Government of Haryana aimed at providing citizens with seamless access to a wide range of government services
Indira awas yojana housing scheme renamed as PMAYnarinav14
Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) played a significant role in addressing rural housing needs in India. It emerged as a comprehensive program for affordable housing solutions in rural areas, predating the government’s broader focus on mass housing initiatives.
1. Interest Rates and the Debt
December 10, 2015
CHAIRMEN
MITCH DANIELS
LEON PANETTA
TIM PENNY
PRESIDENT
MAYA MACGUINEAS
DIRECTORS
BARRY ANDERSON
ERSKINE BOWLES
CHARLES BOWSHER
KENT CONRAD
DAN CRIPPEN
VIC FAZIO
WILLIS GRADISON
WILLIAM HOAGLAND
JIM JONES
LOU KERR
JIM KOLBE
DAVE MCCURDY
JAMES MCINTYRE, JR.
DAVID MINGE
JUNE O’NEILL
PAUL O’NEILL
MARNE OBERNAUER, JR.
BOB PACKWOOD
RUDOLPH PENNER
PETER PETERSON
ROBERT REISCHAUER
ALICE RIVLIN
CHARLES ROBB
MARTIN SABO
ALAN K. SIMPSON
JOHN SPRATT
CHARLIE STENHOLM
GENE STEUERLE
DAVID STOCKMAN
JOHN TANNER
TOM TAUKE
GEORGE VOINOVICH
PAUL VOLCKER
CAROL COX WAIT
DAVID M. WALKER
JOSEPH WRIGHT, JR.
1900 M Street NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20036 • Phone: 202-596-3597 • Fax: 202-478-0681 • www.crfb.org
2. ast year, the federal government spent about
$223 billion on net interest payments to
service our debt, the equivalent of roughly
6 percent of the budget and 1.2 percent of
Gross Domestic Product (GDP). As a share of the
economy, the government has not spent this little on
interest since the 1960s, but this trend is soon set to
reverse.
Currently, interest rates are at unprecedented and
historic lows – the 10-year note currently pays about
2.3 percent in interest and the 3-month Treasury bill
is about 0.25 percent. As the national and global
economy recovers and the Federal Reserve unwinds
its expansionary monetary policy, interest rates are
projected to grow and federal interest spending is
expected to follow. Indeed, interest is slated to be
the fastest growing part of the budget over the next
decade.
Given the role that interest will contribute to the
United States’ substantial fiscal challenges, interest
costs cannot be treated as merely a side effect in
the budget. Even under current projections, interest
spending threatens to crowd out other important
priorities, and our high level of debt puts the
country’s finances at substantial risk if interest rates
rise further than expected.
L
1
Interest Rates and the Debt
Interest Rates and the Debt
3. 2
he $223 billion in interest costs this year
resulted from servicing the $13.1 trillion
debt at an average interest rate of 1.7 percent.
Even at today’s record-low interest rates, this is
already more than we spend on the Departments of
Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs combined.
This is also more than our combined spending on
the Departments of Education, Housing and Urban
Development, and Transportation. Every dollar
the United States devotes to interest payments is
a dollar that cannot fund national priorities or that
Interest Rates and the Debt
The Current Costs of Interest on the Debt
T
4. A
3
Projections of Interest on the Debt
Interest Rates and the Debt
s interest rates rise back to more normal
levels and debt continues to grow, the
Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
expects spending on debt service to
increase significantly.
CBO projects the 10-year Treasury note interest rate
to increase from about 2.3 percent today to an
average of 4.3 percent after 2020 and the interest
rate on 3-month Treasury bills to increase from
about 0.25 percent in today to 3.4 percent after 2020.
CBO also projects debt held by the public will grow
from $13.1 trillion at the end of fiscal year 2015 to
$21.0 trillion by 2025. As a result of these factors,
interest payments will rise.
Based on CBO’s August baseline (which excludes
some recently-passed legislation):
• In nominal dollars, net interest costs will nearly
double between 2015 and 2019 from roughly
$220 billion to nearly $440 billion; by 2025
interest costs will have grown about 350 percent
to $755 billion.
• As a share of the economy, federal interest
payments are expected to double by 2021, from
1.2 to 2.4 percent of GDP, and then continue to
grow to 2.8 percent of GDP by 2025.
• The annual budget deficit will rise from $439
billion in 2015 to $1.0 trillion in 2025. This can
is almost entirely explained by the $532 billion
rise in interest payments.
• By2022,interestpaymentswillsurpasshowmuch
the government spends on all of its investments,
including research and development, education,
training, and infrastructure.
• By 2025, interest payments will consume 15%
of all revenue collected and represent 1 out of
every 8 dollars the government spends.
5. 4Interest Rates and the Debt
What if Interest Rates Differ from Projections?
C
BO expects interest rates to rise, but not to
their pre-crisis levels. As a result of slower
labor force and productivity growth,
growing income inequality, and other
factors, CBO projects rates (on an inflation-adjusted
basis) will be about one percentage point lower than
the average between 1990 and 2007. If interest
rates differ from CBO’s projections, the budgetary
implications could be significant.
For example:
• If real interest rates return to pre-crisis levels,
interest payments over the next decade would be
$1.7 trillion higher – increasing debt in 2025 by
6 percent of GDP.
• If real interest rates returned to pre-crisis level,
debt held by the public would exceed the size of
the economy by 2033.
• If real interest rates returned to the levels seen
in the 1980s, interest payments would be $6
trillion higher, increasing debt in 2025 by 22
percent of GDP.
• Conversely, if real interest rates remain around
the levels we’ve seen over the past 10 years,
deficits and debt over the next decade would be
$1.6 trillion lower.
With the help of historically low interest rates, this
year’s deficits are significantly lower than just a
few years ago. However, trillion-dollar deficits
are poised to return as interest rates rise over the
next decade. And without a plan to reduce debt
levels from their current historic highs, even small
increases in interest rates beyond projected levels
could significantly worsen an already unsustainable
fiscal picture. The best way policymakers can
protect against the risk of rising interest rates is
to enact a thoughtful mixture of tax and spending
reforms that put the debt on a clear downward path
over the long run.
Conclusion