Presentation made by Caroline Gray-Stephens, Head of Enterprise Europe Network-Scotland at BIP Asia 2012 hosted by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC), 7 December 2012.
Presentation made by Caroline Gray-Stephens, Head of Enterprise Europe Network - Scotland (EEN-Scotland) at BIP Asia 2012 hosted by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (7 December 2012)
ICIC 2012 - The Meeting
ICIC is the International Conference on Trends for Scientific Information Professionals.
ICIC International Conference for the Information Community
For those in the sci-tech world, sharing best practices, networking and evaluating trends have become matters of considerable importance, and the annual ICIC Meeting & Exhibition is the significant forum for this, attracting over 200 attendees from the main sci-tech companies and information, service or software providers.
Social Media 2.5 Conference | Research & Development: Innovationsnetzwerke al...Social Media Schweiz
Die Social Media 2.5 Conference fand am 23. Mai 2012 im Technopark in Zürich statt. Die Präsentationen der einzelnen Referate sind auf Slideshare aufgeschalten. Sämtliche Referate sind als Videocast unter www.socialmediaschweiz.ch/html/sm25.html kostenlos verfügbar.
Presentation made by Caroline Gray-Stephens, Head of Enterprise Europe Network-Scotland at BIP Asia 2012 hosted by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC), 7 December 2012.
Presentation made by Caroline Gray-Stephens, Head of Enterprise Europe Network - Scotland (EEN-Scotland) at BIP Asia 2012 hosted by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (7 December 2012)
ICIC 2012 - The Meeting
ICIC is the International Conference on Trends for Scientific Information Professionals.
ICIC International Conference for the Information Community
For those in the sci-tech world, sharing best practices, networking and evaluating trends have become matters of considerable importance, and the annual ICIC Meeting & Exhibition is the significant forum for this, attracting over 200 attendees from the main sci-tech companies and information, service or software providers.
Social Media 2.5 Conference | Research & Development: Innovationsnetzwerke al...Social Media Schweiz
Die Social Media 2.5 Conference fand am 23. Mai 2012 im Technopark in Zürich statt. Die Präsentationen der einzelnen Referate sind auf Slideshare aufgeschalten. Sämtliche Referate sind als Videocast unter www.socialmediaschweiz.ch/html/sm25.html kostenlos verfügbar.
Sources of innovations have considerably changed in the past. How can policy makers react? What are the key desing features of new innovation support schemes. Based on the so called ANIS approach, regional innovation systems can be analysed and appropriate innovation support schemes developed.
A detailed overview of Sheffield City Region Local Economic Partnership's strategy for the Creative & Digital Industries sector, including ideas about the region's digital ecosystem and collaboration centre network. Follow more at http://collabojam.net.
FITT Toolbox: Charter for IP & Technology TransferFITT
Within each research organization the adoption and dissemination of clear rules regarding technology transfer and the management of intellectual property greatly facilitate collaborations with industrial partners. A charter proposing guidelines for strategic management in this regard is available in the FITT toolbox. Without any legal constraints, it can easily be used by other research institutions. Based on the results of a European task force and already in force in many research institutions in France, this charter has received the support of the FITT consortium.
www.FITT-for-Innovation.eu
Product Design In Ireland - Burton Lee - Ciaran Dynes - TCD UCD Innovation Al...Burton Lee
Talk on "Product Design in Ireland" given by Burton Lee (Stanford), Ciaran Dynes (Progress-IONA) and Ian Quinn (Creganna) as a part of the TCD/UCD Innovation Alliance, at Science Gallery in Dublin, January 27 2010. See also companion talk on "Medical Device Product Design in Ireland" by Ian Quinn of Creganna Tactx, given as a part of this lecture.
Steven Geiger - Skolkovo - International Best Practices in Innovation ManagementIshmidt
An overview of the new innovation center being built in Skolkovo, Russia. Describes the strategy, investment and infrastructure of this strategic initiative of the Russian government.
In the world of the enterprise, innovation must extend from the initial ambitious ideas gathered from R&D labs around the world, all the way through applied R&D with industry partners, and into the development and commercialization of technology products and platforms.
Innovation starts with the spark of the right culture and talent meeting that ambitious and once hidden idea. But it doesn’t stop there. In the world of the enterprise, I see the practice of innovation as encompassing a full lifecycle. It starts with those crazy and ambitious ideas that are then iterated and shepherded through a rigorous process of applied R&D. For the ideas that finally prove their worth, new technology products
and platforms that address significant business problems are created and taken into the marketplace.
I call this multi-phase process: Full Lifecycle Innovation. It is a practical approach to one of the most creative and essential practices in business today:
Transforming Ideas form the Lab Into Marketplace Realities
The practice of Full lifecycle innovation requires a layer of processes, resources and decision criteria – each one a little different for the four phases of the journey:
1. Open Innovation
2. Applied R&D
3. Product and Platform Development
4. Commercialization
At each step, truly powerful events are triggered, explored and nurtured as different players, technologies and ideas enter the mix. All of them are serving the goal of creating something that is substantially bigger and more impactful than the simple sum of its parts. Something that is truly remarkable.
At NTT i3, we believe that Full Lifecycle Innovation is about:
Curating a culture of ambitious ideas
With rebellious talent from around the world
Dedicated to turning hidden opportunities into real products
That make a difference for the enterprise
Kaupunkien elinvoiman vertailuanalyysi 2005 2013TimoAro
Analyysin kohteena oli 26 väestöllisesti suurinta kaupunkia. Kaupunkien elinvoimaa analysoitiin viiden eri teeman avulla: aluetalous, työllisyys, innovatiivisuus, vetovoima ja sosiaalinen tasa-arvo. Jokaisessa teemassa oli neljä absoluuttista ja suhteellista muuttujaa.
Kaikki kaupungit jaettiin viiteen viidennekseen absoluuttisen ja suhteellisen elinvoiman mukaan. Absoluuttista elinvoimaa analysoitiin korkeimpien tai parhaiden arvojen perusteella, mikä nostaa esiin rakenteellisesti vahvimmat ja kilpailukykyisimmät kaupungit. Suhteellista elinvoimaa taas analysoitiin muutos- ja kasvuprosenttien perusteella, mikä tuo näkyviin nosteessa olevat, muutosherkimmät ja ketterimmät kaupungit. Jokaisen kaupungin sijoitusta verrattiin muuttujittain toisiinsa absoluuttisen ja suhteellisen elinvoiman mukaan. Muuttujien summapisteet laskettiin yhteen. Tämän jälkeen kaupungit jaettiin sijoitusten keskiarvon perusteella viiteen viidennekseen.
Analyysin aineistona käytettiin Tilastokeskuksen ja Kuntaliiton tilastoja vuosilta 2005–2013.
Analyysin kohdekaupungit olivat Helsinki, Espoo, Tampere, Vantaa, Oulu, Turku, Jyväskylä, Kuopio, Lahti, Kouvola, Pori, Joensuu, Lappeenranta, Hämeenlinna, Vaasa, Rovaniemi, Seinäjoki, Kotka, Mikkeli, Salo, Porvoo, Lohja, Kokkola, Hyvinkää, Rauma ja Kajaani.
Sources of innovations have considerably changed in the past. How can policy makers react? What are the key desing features of new innovation support schemes. Based on the so called ANIS approach, regional innovation systems can be analysed and appropriate innovation support schemes developed.
A detailed overview of Sheffield City Region Local Economic Partnership's strategy for the Creative & Digital Industries sector, including ideas about the region's digital ecosystem and collaboration centre network. Follow more at http://collabojam.net.
FITT Toolbox: Charter for IP & Technology TransferFITT
Within each research organization the adoption and dissemination of clear rules regarding technology transfer and the management of intellectual property greatly facilitate collaborations with industrial partners. A charter proposing guidelines for strategic management in this regard is available in the FITT toolbox. Without any legal constraints, it can easily be used by other research institutions. Based on the results of a European task force and already in force in many research institutions in France, this charter has received the support of the FITT consortium.
www.FITT-for-Innovation.eu
Product Design In Ireland - Burton Lee - Ciaran Dynes - TCD UCD Innovation Al...Burton Lee
Talk on "Product Design in Ireland" given by Burton Lee (Stanford), Ciaran Dynes (Progress-IONA) and Ian Quinn (Creganna) as a part of the TCD/UCD Innovation Alliance, at Science Gallery in Dublin, January 27 2010. See also companion talk on "Medical Device Product Design in Ireland" by Ian Quinn of Creganna Tactx, given as a part of this lecture.
Steven Geiger - Skolkovo - International Best Practices in Innovation ManagementIshmidt
An overview of the new innovation center being built in Skolkovo, Russia. Describes the strategy, investment and infrastructure of this strategic initiative of the Russian government.
In the world of the enterprise, innovation must extend from the initial ambitious ideas gathered from R&D labs around the world, all the way through applied R&D with industry partners, and into the development and commercialization of technology products and platforms.
Innovation starts with the spark of the right culture and talent meeting that ambitious and once hidden idea. But it doesn’t stop there. In the world of the enterprise, I see the practice of innovation as encompassing a full lifecycle. It starts with those crazy and ambitious ideas that are then iterated and shepherded through a rigorous process of applied R&D. For the ideas that finally prove their worth, new technology products
and platforms that address significant business problems are created and taken into the marketplace.
I call this multi-phase process: Full Lifecycle Innovation. It is a practical approach to one of the most creative and essential practices in business today:
Transforming Ideas form the Lab Into Marketplace Realities
The practice of Full lifecycle innovation requires a layer of processes, resources and decision criteria – each one a little different for the four phases of the journey:
1. Open Innovation
2. Applied R&D
3. Product and Platform Development
4. Commercialization
At each step, truly powerful events are triggered, explored and nurtured as different players, technologies and ideas enter the mix. All of them are serving the goal of creating something that is substantially bigger and more impactful than the simple sum of its parts. Something that is truly remarkable.
At NTT i3, we believe that Full Lifecycle Innovation is about:
Curating a culture of ambitious ideas
With rebellious talent from around the world
Dedicated to turning hidden opportunities into real products
That make a difference for the enterprise
Kaupunkien elinvoiman vertailuanalyysi 2005 2013TimoAro
Analyysin kohteena oli 26 väestöllisesti suurinta kaupunkia. Kaupunkien elinvoimaa analysoitiin viiden eri teeman avulla: aluetalous, työllisyys, innovatiivisuus, vetovoima ja sosiaalinen tasa-arvo. Jokaisessa teemassa oli neljä absoluuttista ja suhteellista muuttujaa.
Kaikki kaupungit jaettiin viiteen viidennekseen absoluuttisen ja suhteellisen elinvoiman mukaan. Absoluuttista elinvoimaa analysoitiin korkeimpien tai parhaiden arvojen perusteella, mikä nostaa esiin rakenteellisesti vahvimmat ja kilpailukykyisimmät kaupungit. Suhteellista elinvoimaa taas analysoitiin muutos- ja kasvuprosenttien perusteella, mikä tuo näkyviin nosteessa olevat, muutosherkimmät ja ketterimmät kaupungit. Jokaisen kaupungin sijoitusta verrattiin muuttujittain toisiinsa absoluuttisen ja suhteellisen elinvoiman mukaan. Muuttujien summapisteet laskettiin yhteen. Tämän jälkeen kaupungit jaettiin sijoitusten keskiarvon perusteella viiteen viidennekseen.
Analyysin aineistona käytettiin Tilastokeskuksen ja Kuntaliiton tilastoja vuosilta 2005–2013.
Analyysin kohdekaupungit olivat Helsinki, Espoo, Tampere, Vantaa, Oulu, Turku, Jyväskylä, Kuopio, Lahti, Kouvola, Pori, Joensuu, Lappeenranta, Hämeenlinna, Vaasa, Rovaniemi, Seinäjoki, Kotka, Mikkeli, Salo, Porvoo, Lohja, Kokkola, Hyvinkää, Rauma ja Kajaani.
Muuttoliike ja kaupungistuminen aluekehityksen muutosvoiminaTimoAro
Esitys muuttoliikkeen ja kaupungistumisen välisestä yhteydestä. Esityksessä käydään läpi suurten ja keskisuurten kaupunkiseutujen kehityskuvaa 2010-luvulla ja muuttoliikettä aluekehityksen yhtenä muutosvoimana seitsemän erityispiirteen kautta.
Joachim Henkel provides an overview of the concept of IP Modularity introduced in his article with Carliss Baldwin and Willy Shih. These three authors claim that firms seeking to take advantage of distributed innovation and outsourcing can bridge the tension between value creation and value capture by modifying the modular structure of their technical systems.
Henkel, J., Baldwin, C. Y., & Shih, W. (2013). IP Modularity: Profiting from innovation by aligning product architecture with intellectual property. California Management Review, 55(4), 65.
Lounaisrannikon elinvoima- ja kilpailukykyanalyysiTimoAro
Lounaisrannikon elinvoima- ja kilpailukykyanalyysissa tarkasteltiin neljän Lounaisrannikon kaupunkiseudun asemaa suhteessa muihin keskisuuriin ja suuriin kaupunkiseutuihin. Kaupunkiseudut olivat Turun, Vakka-Suomen, Rauman ja Porin kaupunkiseudut, joissa asuu yhteensä noin 550 000 asukasta eli noin joka kymmenes suomalainen.
Louran positiota analysoitiin usesta elinvoimaan liittyvästä näkökulmasta, jotka liittyivät mm. saavutettavuuteen, alue- ja kuntatalouteen, työllisyyteen, yritysdynamiikkaan, väestökehitykseen, muuttovetovoimaan ja osaamiseen. Analyysiin otettiin vertailuvuosiksi vuosien 2000-2012 välinen aika.
This document provides an impressive and elaborated risk factors that usually contribute to smoking and often went unrecognizable from a naked eye, with psychological, social and environmental perspective
Safe Nests in Global Nets - Innovation and IPAlberto Minin
This presentation and related paper contributes to research providing a new interpretation for the appropriability of critical industrial R&D, and in general to the literature on internationalization and maturation of R&D off shoring.
Critical R&D projects and technologies remain home-bound even in very large multinationals. Why? I was able to discuss the result of my quantitative empirical analysis directly with the managers involved in key decisions relating to the development of some of these technologies.
Their viewpoint suggests the presence of what I have defined “Safe R&D nests”. I will discuss that such “safeness” derives by a close coordination between scientific and technological research and management of intangible assets.
Doran, Jordan and O'Leary (2012) - Presentation to SSISI 1st nov 2012doran_justin
This paper estimates the private returns to four different kinds of R&D spending on the probability of Irish and foreign-owned businesses engaging in product, process and organizational innovation. By providing econometric analysis of nearly 2000 businesses in the Community Innovation Survey: 2004 to 2006, it makes an important contribution to our understanding of the effects of Irish innovation policy, which has incentivized businesses to spend on R&D in Ireland. The main findings are that Irish-owned businesses are significantly more likely than foreign-owned to introduce new products as a result of creative R&D work undertaken. Foreign-owned businesses, which spend nearly 6 times more per worker on R&D than Irish-owned, enjoy very high returns mostly from the purchase or licence of patents. This reflects a fundamental difference in the innovation activities of these businesses, which is critical for policymakers’ understanding of the Irish innovation system.
As businesses search for lower costs, supply chains have evolved from local to regional to global, and are increasing levels for offshoring of component suppliers and contract manufacturers. As a result, new risks associated with Intellectual Property (IP) have been introduced into design and supply chains. Mitigating these risks is essential for the successful commercialization of new products.
Gain 5 valuable insights about:
• IP Leakage and where it typically happens
• Where does it happen?
• Current Supply Chain models
• Key product considerations
• Structural solutions to protect IP
I-ESA 2010, The International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise S...Le Scienze Web News
I-ESA 2010, The International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications
COVENTRY, United Kingdom
Doctoral Symposium: April 12th, 2010
Workshop Day: April 13th, 2010
Conference: April 14th – 15th, 2010
Instituto Pedro Nunes is the main link between the University of Coimbra (Portugal) and the business sector. We help startups with mentorship, network, R&D and technology, IP support, fund seeking and other stuff that might be useful to our entrepreneurs.
Which country provided the strongest patent system in 2015/16? What are the key challenges SMEs need to address when implementing patents? How can you make joint development success? In anticipation to the 10th anniversary of the Global Patent Congress, Legal IQ have spoken to 10 industry leaders to provide you with insights and solutions to these questions and more in the 2nd edition of the GPC eBook.
Download your complimentary copy here to find out what experts from Draexlmaier Group, Genovis, Munich Regional Court, Stryker Corporation, among many others, are doing to stay ahead in the patent industry.
http://www.patentcongress.com/mediacenter?utm_source=slideshare&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=-external-social&utm_term=resourcecenter&utm_content=text&mac=19724.006_slideshare&disc=19724.006_slideshare
The Sino Italian Innovation Base Camp in ChongqingAlberto Minin
THE SINO-ITALIAN INNOVATION
BASE CAMP WILL EMPOWER BISHAN OPEN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM BY STRENGTHENING THE CONNECTIONS WITH ITALIAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
The Istituto Galileo Galilei will coordinate for Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa this project.
400 Hectares of land for the - Sino Italian Innovation base camp in ChongqingAlberto Minin
My talk during the TEDx at Scuola Sant'Anna introducing the innovation base camp, which will connect Italian science and technology with Bishan and Chongqing Open Innovation Ecosystem.
Open Innovation for the Digital Shift - A collection of case studies in the I...Alberto Minin
Based on 13 case studies of innovative ICT and ICT-enabled European companies, we describe how the implementation of Open Innovation Strategies (OIS) characterized the successful exploitation of technological innovation projects. We investigated 4 large companies and 9 SMEs.
In all our 13 cases, companies’ innovation strategies tended to be “open but controlled”. A strong balance was needed between openness (e.g. collaborative R&D, open business models and digital 2.0 business models) and control (clear appropriation strategies to ensure a “return on R&D investments”). Large companies can easily implement OIS because they are better positioned than SMEs to orchestrate research partnerships (e.g. setting the agenda of large consortia). These companies are more likely to approach OIS using Human Resources Management and to focus on long–term objectives. SMEs implement OIS by opening up their business model and benefit from relevant external knowledge needed to unlock the market potential of technology. SMEs participate in large R&D networks and engage in ecosystems to gain reputation, foster expertise exchange, and gather new skills. An OI culture and adequate appropriation strategies allow SMEs to successfully open their R&D processes without bearing rising search costs and without risking losing business-critical knowledge
We identified drivers and barriers for companies pursuing OIS in Europe. Drivers include EU consortia (cooperation and networking) and the building of communities and platforms to share assets that they can control (e.g. IP protected assets). Companies also faced barriers to OIS because their internal management struggled to balance internal R&D and external knowledge absorption. Some companies felt that European and national innovation systems did not provide sufficient institutional support and/or they felt that some rules and regulations prevented innovation.
Alberto Di Minin - Open Innovation 2.0 - Findings of JRC studyAlberto Minin
My presentation on findings of my recent study supported by JRC on Open Innovation across Europe, during the Open Innovation 2.0 Conference in Amsterdam. You can find the complete report of the study here: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/case-studies-open-innovation-ict
The SME Innovation Instrument, Horizon2020 and Talent Europe. A discussion by...Alberto Minin
I provide a quick introduction to the Meridian Fellowship on Social Innovation and to my project, Talent Europe,
I will then present some of the latest numbers regarding the implementation of the SME Innovation instrument, one of the most innovative parts of the 8th presentation Framework program called Horizon 2020
I will briefly share with you three concepts that I think might be interesting to explore as a basis of a useful comparison between Europe and US science and technology Policy.
What I am seeking to do as a Meridian Fellow is to expand my expertise on science and technology policy and to contribute to the debate around this topic that is developing in Europe. I think that there are better ways to engage and to empower EU talent, and to make it become key player of EU Economic Recovery and competitiveness
The US had been a continuous source of inspiration for the EU debate on science and technology, and more in general on innovation policy.
Later on I will discuss about the SME innovation instrument that had been inspired in part by the SBIR program here in the US.
Not only policy makers and scholars have been guiding this exchange of ideas and experiences, but also US Embassies in Europe have been very important in sharing with Europe some news. I am very familiar with the case of the US Embassies in Italy. The past three Ambassadors have been evangelists of messages and priorities. Ronald Spogli emphasized the role of high tech entrepreneurs in society, David Thorne has focused on the role the digital economy can have a driver of growth, more recently the sitting ambassador, John Phillips is very vocal about the benefits that Italy could derive by a more efficient judiciary system
My experience as scholar, and teacher is telling me that the debate on innovation in Europe is desperately in need of some fresh air and new ideas.
I believe that there are four areas where we can look.
The first one has to do with new original ways to communicate the relevance of sicence and technology for society.
The second has to do with the way we mentor and assist scientists and engineers that seek to become entrepreneurs. What is the role of universities, government and private sector to achieve this task.
Third area is corporate entrepreneurship, industrial venturing and the attitude EU large corporations have towards change.
Finally demands side innovation policy: public procurement and the setting of challenges and ambitious goals, where sometimes the role of the government should not be to provide the means to achieve these goals, but to promise to act as first buyer for the best solutions for a specific challenge.
Nuovi vettori di trasferimento di conoscenzeAlberto Minin
I have delivered this presentation at #ReStart Calabria, an event organized by Calabria Innova. I discuss (in Italian) about 5 priorities for technology/knowledge transfer.
Rudi Bekkers shares with the AOM audience the ideas of his paper authored with Simon den Uijl and Henk de Vries, whose focus is on Patent Pools. Their work examines the experiences with three generations of patent pools in the optical disc industry.
den Uijl, S., Bekkers, R., & de Vries, H. (2013). Managing intellectual property using patent pools: Lessons from three generations of pools in the optical disc industry. California Management Review, 55(4), 31-50.
James Conley and Peter Bican share the floor to explain the idea of value articulation, which they describe in detail in their piece with Holger Ernst. With the framework, the management of IP rights is explained within marketing constructs such as the unique selling proposition. The a
AOM2013 PDW: Intellectual Property Management and Strategy & Cal Mgmt. Review...Alberto Minin
Alberto Di Minin and Dries Faems provide an introduction to the special issue, discussing in particular the concept of Appropriation Advantage, and how firms can differentiate from competitors by identifying a superior IP Management Strategy. Three main challenges are identified and explained, with "integration" being the key concept of the entire issue.
Di Minin, A., & Faems, D. (2013). Building Appropriation Advantage. California Management Review, 55(4), 7-14.
Innovation Policy of MIUR: a message to the Green & Smart Cities community Alberto Minin
This is the presentation (in Italian) that Andrea Paraboschi (SSSA) and I shared with the Green City Energy conference in Pisa. We illustrated the main guidelines of Minister Maria Chiara Carrozza's agenda. We discussed about the need to be focused, to be inclusive and to challenge Italian's creativity and talent.
Social media marketing today and tomorrowAlberto Minin
Can we say that social media were the drivers of a second ICT revolution? Apparently so. In this presentation I try to show that there are many lessons that we can draw from previous disruptive changes in the industry, but that companies need to be outliers and define new business models and new business processes to leverage the advantaged offered them by new social medias. Various Italian and American cases are cited, as well as research in the field. Useful for your intro class on internet marketing.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
1. Interfirm Relationships and
Appropriability
Safe Nests in Global Nets
Alberto Di Minin
Di Minin, A., & Bianchi, M. 2011. Safe Nests in Global Nets:
Internalization and Appropriability of R&D in Wireless Telecom.
Journal of International Business Studies, 42(7): 910-934.
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing Innovation
1
within and between firms
2. We claim to be students of
innovation
APPROPRIABILITY
USER-LED
INNOVATION
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
Innovation within and between firms
3. Removing a “safe” assumption
Appropriability
is evenly distributed
across the corporate network
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
3
Innovation within and between firms
4. My Starting Point:
Patel and Pavitt
The case of R&D Non Globalization
“We expect to see greater
internationalization
of large firms‟ technological activities in the
future…”
Patel, P & Pavitt, P. 1991
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
4
Innovation within and between firms
5. Research Question 20 years after
Can we find evidence of
“Non Globalization”?
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
5
Innovation within and between firms
6. Wireless Telecom as an interesting
case: all signs of globalization…
Demand factors
• Deregulation and break-up of national monopolies, new
regional markets with local players demand and tastes
Supply factors
• Technological convergence, emerging/new „centers of
excellence‟ (Eastern Europe, China, India etc.), supply of
both high skilled and low cost engineers
Intermediating factors
• Interoperability and modularization, integration of
technologies developed worldwide…
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
6
Innovation within and between firms
7. …but also an interesting area for
Collaboration and Open Innovation
practices!
• Standardization of wireless communication
• ETSI system of notification of patents as an analytical lens to single out
„more significant‟ inventive activity
• The 4 largest assignees of ETSI “essential” patents:
– Ericsson, Qualcomm, Motorola, Nokia:
64% of all essential patents
USPTO (US) Patents Assigned to the 4 Companies*
SAMPLE (ES): CONTROL
537 USPTO GROUP (CG):
PATENTS 1420 USPTO
Int. Prot. PATENTS
Patents in
the same
technology
Essential
classes
Patents * For US companies
solely US patent families
excluded from analysis
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
7
Innovation within and between firms
8. Types of ETSI Standards mainly
covered by the empirical analysis
DVB
V5 Interface
DECT
GSM GPRS UMTS
GSM/AMR-NB
3GPP/AMR-WB
TETRA
1980 1990 2000
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
8
Innovation within and between firms
9. Distribution of Patents
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
9
Innovation within and between firms
10. The main result
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
10
Innovation within and between firms
11. Inferential Analysis
Patel & Pavitt
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
11
Innovation within and between firms
12. Findings so far
• The Patel Pavitt paradox remains!
– In a very globalized industry we still see
strongly homebound inventive activities
once „R&D‟ is dissected by
economic/technological/strategic content
– Concentration in the headquarters of the
most strategic R&D
• Why is this happening?
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
12
Innovation within and between firms
13. Why R&D does not decentralize so easily?
Insights from the company interviews
• Centres of Excellence argument
• In-house R&D (DO patents) still remains
important due to „intrafirm intermediating
factors‟:
– Accumulated „sticky‟ knowledge at HQ,
organizational inertia
– Maturation effect and steep learning curves in
R&D internationalization
– Importance of centralized IP management in
this particular industry
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
13
Innovation within and between firms
14. Islands of Appropriability
argument
“An academic paper gets published and cited not
only because of its scientific contribution, but also
because of its effective structure and
communication style. The same details are also
relevant when drafting a patent, and are typically
the responsibility of IP experts.
The closer you are with the people who end up
using and enforcing your patent, the more valuable
for the company this patent is likely to be.”
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
14
Innovation within and between firms
15. Islands of Appropriability
Maturation
of R&D Subsidiary
DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL R&D AND IP
LOCAL EXPERTISE MANAGEMENT
PLUG INTO
THE GLOBAL NETWORK
Centers of
Excellence Appropriable
Intrafirm
Knowledge Safe Nests
Relationships
Mgmt. IP Mgmt.
R&D Mgmt.
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
15
Innovation within and between firms
16. So what do we seek to find in a
Safe Nest?
• R&D laboratories that offer a desirable setting for
a high level of exploitation of research results
• Premier locations for the development of the
more influential technologies
• The unequal distribution of appropriability across
a firm’s R&D network is at the base of the
formation and reinforcement of safe nests
• Appropriability peaks because the level of
coordination between inventors and IP managers
is the highest
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
16
Innovation within and between firms
17. Expectations about Safe Nests
• This central role is likely to endure, and it
contributes to organizational inertia, shaping
interfirm relationship and path dependence for
technological development
1. they are the sites where focal research streams
were initiated (knowledge stickiness).
2. they have moved further along the R&D learning
curve with respect to R&D subsidiaries.
3. Location: not a monolithic concept. Yes the HQ,
but not necessarily
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
17
Innovation within and between firms
18. Special issue on
Co-Edited Alberto + Dries
California Management Review
“IP Management: in search of new practices,
strategies and business models”
Supported by the European Patent Office
…To be
continued
31.10.2012 18
19. Seeking for more evidence of
Safe Nests
(C) 2012 Alberto Di Minin - Universiteit Groningen Workshop Organizing
19
Innovation within and between firms
20. Di Minin, A., & Bianchi, M. 2011. Safe Nests in Global Nets: Internalization and
Appropriability of R&D in Wireless Telecom. Journal of International
Business Studies, 42(7): 910-934.
alberto@sssup.it
www.diminin.it
DANK U WEL
31.10.2012 20