3. Domains RIVM
● Public Health and Care
● Environment and Safety
● Infectious disease and Vaccins
GRF One health| November19th
4. Tasks
− Policy advice
− National coordination
− Prevention- and intervention
programs
− Information for professionals
and citizens
− Research and knowledge
development
− Advice to inspectorates
− Emergency response
GRF One health| November19th
7. „The risk‟ & the Dutch Debate
Item
Surface of the Netherlands
Dutch population
Cows
Pigs
Chickens
Sheep/ goats
Amount in 2010/ 2011
41, 500 km²
16.7 million people
4 million 33.000 companies
12 million 7.000 companies
100 million 2.400 companies
1.1 million 13.000 companies
8. Defining MEGA-farms
● Number of mega farms
– 2009
› About 250 – 400
● Ruimtelijke spreiding
● NGE (Nederlandse Grootte
Eenheden)
– >300 is large
› 2000: 334
› 2009: 660
– >500 is MEGA
› 2.000 sows or 12.500 pigs or
185.000 laying-hens or 360.000
chicks. (MNP (PBL), Raden voor Landelijk gebied;
Dieraangelegenheden, RIVM)
GRF One health| November19th
9. Exploration
● Explorative literaturereview (mainly „grey
literature‟)
● Web-sites
● Neighbouring countries
● Interviews with key-informants
(for public-health decision-making or experts on
risk governance)
10. Policy: Sustainable and suitable
Public
Health
Animal
Welfare
Manure
Sustainable Animal husbandry
Norms
Anti
biotics
GRF One health| November19th
14. Findings
Uncertainty
Lack of clarity
Which risks?
Concerns about health How large are the risks?
risks related to IAPS Which options to decrease
(risk)
risks?
Now and in the future.
Trust
Is there (easy access to)
trustworthy and sufficient
information on risk and control
options?
Do industrial agricultural
partners and/ or governmental
Concerns about
Alienation from animal
actors really put public health
industrial agricultural
husbandry; (perceived) lack of interests before economic
sector
transparency and visibility
interests?
(activity causing risk)
Image/ visibility of partners.
Concerns about risk
management
(process to manage
risk)
Who is responsible for (which
part of) the risk management?
How is this responsibility
taken?
Aim of risk management
process?
Does the right actor feel
responsible and show
responsibility?
Transparency/ visibility of risk
governance process.
16. Preliminary recomandations
Managment
● Integrated risk assessment and
management could improve risk
governance (incl. framing and concern
assessements)
● Structure debate: differentiate
concerns, also at national and local level
● Explicit leadership (public-private
partnerships)
● Develop a shared research agenda
addressing stakeholder concerns as start
of participatory risk appraisal process.
Research
● Development of (methodologically sound)
frameworks applicable at national and
local levels to incorporate concerns and
perceptions of stakeholders in policymaking and communication.
● Development of (validated) tools to
perform “real-time” concerns assessment
(social media?)
● Research adressing „trust among
stakeholders‟, „trust in information‟ and
„trust in riskgovernance‟ (to support
constructive discussions)
● Elicit beliefs of stakeholders and their
suggestions to the future of agricultural
practice in the Netherlands to also gain
insights in risk acceptance and
tolerability.
GRF One health| November19th