The document discusses personalized learning and outlines effective practices and indicators for digital learning, blended learning, and developing students' cognitive, metacognitive, motivational, and social/emotional competencies. It describes personalized learning as instruction that is paced to individual needs, tailored to learning preferences, and tailored to specific student interests. The document then provides examples of indicators for how schools can effectively implement digital learning, blended learning, and develop various competencies through curriculum, instruction, school culture, and community involvement.
We will use the term “coach” to apply to the people external to the district who provide ongoing support for a District Leadership Team and the people external to the school who provide ongoing support for a School Leadership Team. In some cases, the person is called a “coach,” and in other cases the term may be “capacity builder” or “specialist.” In coaching with Indistar®, your learners are primarily the principal and School Leadership Team. Or, if you are coaching a district team, then your learners are the superintendent and District Leadership Team. Of course, the work of the Leadership Team fans out to engage everyone in the district or school community, so the coach is always mindful of the ways the Leadership Team’s lessons learned are internalized by others, how the Leadership Team’s objectives are explained to everyone, and how the Leadership Team supports each person’s mastery and application of effective practice.
School improvement is premised on the firm belief that it is best accomplished when directed by the people closest to the students,
including classroom teachers, specialists, and school administrators. When working collaboratively in Instructional Teams, rather than
in isolation, they positively impact student achievement (Hattie, 2009). Research-based indicators of effective practice help guide
instructional teams to do their work. This process begins by establishing structures and organization for effective meetings. Once
these have been established, the teams turn to the work of developing standards-aligned units of instruction, among other tasks.
The document is a self-assessment rubric to help schools evaluate their implementation of Indistar, specifically regarding the leadership team component. It provides descriptions of limited, full, and exemplary implementation for areas like leadership team composition, meeting frequency, agendas, minutes, selecting objectives, creating tasks, and monitoring progress. The purpose is to allow schools to self-reflect on implementing the leadership team key with fidelity in order to improve practices and student achievement.
The document provides an overview of Indistar, a school improvement platform that focuses on core school functions and effective practices. It outlines the school leadership team's role in regularly assessing the school's performance on various indicators and working toward their implementation. It lists school success markers related to the leadership team's work, as well as guidance on pacing school progress by focusing on key indicators. The remainder of the document provides details on specific school success indicators within core functions of leadership, curriculum/instruction, classroom instruction, and personalized learning.
1. Indistar is a web-based continuous improvement system adopted by state education agencies to provide clear expectations, resources, and a structured process to guide school and district leadership teams in candidly assessing practices and improving professional practice.
2. It provides indicators of effective practice organized into categories and allows teams to prioritize areas for improvement, access research briefs on indicators, and track progress over time.
3. State agencies can customize Indistar to their needs, provide coaching and feedback to schools and districts, and districts can in turn support schools as they work to implement more effective practices.
The document outlines success markers for a state's implementation of Indistar, which is a software platform used for school and district improvement planning. It provides a checklist for states to indicate the degree to which they have implemented various leadership structures and support systems related to Indistar. Key aspects include designating a state Indistar leader and administrative team to oversee implementation, providing a state Indistar team to support districts and schools, engaging districts to use Indistar for their own improvement, and providing Indistar coaches to assist identified schools and districts. States can calculate their overall degree of implementation based on the percentage of success markers indicated as "Yes".
Indistar was born in 2008, in one state for a select group of persistently low-achieving schools, and has since been changing and adapting and fitting to the contexts of 25 states and thousands of schools across the performance spectrum. We believe it is now poised to up the ante, to raise the stakes, to take a leap forward as a pesky little innovation machine. The innovators in this brave new world will be the states, districts, and schools that have been fitting Indistar to their particular contexts.
The document describes the improvement process used in Indistar. It involves a leadership team that assesses professional practices and student outcomes to guide improvement. Instructional teams do the same at the classroom level. Coaches provide guidance and feedback to the leadership team based on data reviews. The process aims to improve adult performance to enhance student learning. It uses indicators of effective practice organized in domains and sections to track progress. Keys to success include regular review of data by leadership and instructional teams and guidance from coaches.
We will use the term “coach” to apply to the people external to the district who provide ongoing support for a District Leadership Team and the people external to the school who provide ongoing support for a School Leadership Team. In some cases, the person is called a “coach,” and in other cases the term may be “capacity builder” or “specialist.” In coaching with Indistar®, your learners are primarily the principal and School Leadership Team. Or, if you are coaching a district team, then your learners are the superintendent and District Leadership Team. Of course, the work of the Leadership Team fans out to engage everyone in the district or school community, so the coach is always mindful of the ways the Leadership Team’s lessons learned are internalized by others, how the Leadership Team’s objectives are explained to everyone, and how the Leadership Team supports each person’s mastery and application of effective practice.
School improvement is premised on the firm belief that it is best accomplished when directed by the people closest to the students,
including classroom teachers, specialists, and school administrators. When working collaboratively in Instructional Teams, rather than
in isolation, they positively impact student achievement (Hattie, 2009). Research-based indicators of effective practice help guide
instructional teams to do their work. This process begins by establishing structures and organization for effective meetings. Once
these have been established, the teams turn to the work of developing standards-aligned units of instruction, among other tasks.
The document is a self-assessment rubric to help schools evaluate their implementation of Indistar, specifically regarding the leadership team component. It provides descriptions of limited, full, and exemplary implementation for areas like leadership team composition, meeting frequency, agendas, minutes, selecting objectives, creating tasks, and monitoring progress. The purpose is to allow schools to self-reflect on implementing the leadership team key with fidelity in order to improve practices and student achievement.
The document provides an overview of Indistar, a school improvement platform that focuses on core school functions and effective practices. It outlines the school leadership team's role in regularly assessing the school's performance on various indicators and working toward their implementation. It lists school success markers related to the leadership team's work, as well as guidance on pacing school progress by focusing on key indicators. The remainder of the document provides details on specific school success indicators within core functions of leadership, curriculum/instruction, classroom instruction, and personalized learning.
1. Indistar is a web-based continuous improvement system adopted by state education agencies to provide clear expectations, resources, and a structured process to guide school and district leadership teams in candidly assessing practices and improving professional practice.
2. It provides indicators of effective practice organized into categories and allows teams to prioritize areas for improvement, access research briefs on indicators, and track progress over time.
3. State agencies can customize Indistar to their needs, provide coaching and feedback to schools and districts, and districts can in turn support schools as they work to implement more effective practices.
The document outlines success markers for a state's implementation of Indistar, which is a software platform used for school and district improvement planning. It provides a checklist for states to indicate the degree to which they have implemented various leadership structures and support systems related to Indistar. Key aspects include designating a state Indistar leader and administrative team to oversee implementation, providing a state Indistar team to support districts and schools, engaging districts to use Indistar for their own improvement, and providing Indistar coaches to assist identified schools and districts. States can calculate their overall degree of implementation based on the percentage of success markers indicated as "Yes".
Indistar was born in 2008, in one state for a select group of persistently low-achieving schools, and has since been changing and adapting and fitting to the contexts of 25 states and thousands of schools across the performance spectrum. We believe it is now poised to up the ante, to raise the stakes, to take a leap forward as a pesky little innovation machine. The innovators in this brave new world will be the states, districts, and schools that have been fitting Indistar to their particular contexts.
The document describes the improvement process used in Indistar. It involves a leadership team that assesses professional practices and student outcomes to guide improvement. Instructional teams do the same at the classroom level. Coaches provide guidance and feedback to the leadership team based on data reviews. The process aims to improve adult performance to enhance student learning. It uses indicators of effective practice organized in domains and sections to track progress. Keys to success include regular review of data by leadership and instructional teams and guidance from coaches.
1. Select an indicator. Read the Wise Ways. Now focus on the literal meaning of the indicator.
2. How would you assess the current level of implementation of this indicator in your school?
___ No development or implementation
___ Limited development
___ Full implementation
Indistar® is a web-based tool that guides a district or school team in charting its improvement and managing the continuous improvement process. You might call it a change management tool. Indistar® is a platform adapted by each State to fit its needs. Indistar® is called different things in different states. For example, Illinois calls it Rising Star, Alaska calls it STEPP, Idaho and Oklahoma call it the WISE tool, and the Bureau of Indian Education calls it Native Star. The system is also tailored for the purposes of each state, its districts, and its schools.
Indistar® states include in their systems between 20 and 40 district indicators and between 80 and 100 school indicators. Since the school list is more extensive, let’s consider how the work of a school Leadership Team might be paced to cover all of these indicators in a reasonable amount of time.
This document discusses indicators for district support of school improvement. It addresses how the district involves community stakeholders in planning, provides incentives for hard-to-staff schools, intervenes early for struggling schools, and allows school autonomy. It also discusses how the district examines existing strategies, ensures improvement plans use research-based programs, and prepares for challenges during the change process. Finally, it outlines how the district clarifies decision-making authority and expectations for communication and professional development between the district and schools.
How school leadership teams guide their schools’ continuous improvement
And how Coaches and Capacity Builders support their work
School improvement is typically driven by a school-based leadership team. Scrutiny of student learning data informs their decisions and plans. An annual school improvement plan is their primary roadmap. The plan is created and followed for a year, then the cycle starts again. These plans begin by addressing specific subgroups of students and subject areas where the annual assessment shows weakness. The goal is to improve the scores that are low.
Kamlesh Chandra has over 20 years of experience in the education field, working as a director, trainer, facilitator, coach, and mentor. He focuses on data-driven school improvement, setting goals, and monitoring progress to increase student achievement. Some of his strengths include shaping visions of success, cultivating leadership in others, and improving organizational and instructional effectiveness through managing resources, people, and processes.
The document is a quality of work checklist that assesses indicators across two steps - assessment and monitoring. It collects information on the number of indicators analyzed, the number determined to be fully implemented in each step, and uses ratings to evaluate the candor of assessments and adequacy of evidence provided for full implementation determinations. The checklist aims to evaluate the process used to assess indicators and quality of evidence.
Select an indicator. Read the Wise Ways. Now focus on the literal meaning of the indicator.
2. How would you assess the current level of implementation of this indicator in your district?
___ No development or implementation
___ Limited development
___ Full implementation
This document outlines a continuous improvement planning session to identify effective practices and opportunities for growth at a school. It discusses strengthening leadership for all faculty, providing staff development, including foreign faculty in meetings through translation, and clearly sharing goals and expectations. The action plan will draw on theories of critical success factors and leadership to develop the faculty, goals, teamwork, and monitoring processes.
This document presents the Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation's (EVSC) five-year continuous improvement plan called "Maximizing Potential: Blueprint for Student Success 2016-2021". The plan aims to maximize student learning and close achievement gaps by prioritizing student learning through a framework called GAIN, investing in staff professional development, and ensuring strategic alignment of systems and processes through infrastructure improvements. Student learning will be advanced through developing student ownership of learning, implementing social-emotional learning and response to intervention programs, and refining rigorous standards-based lessons. Teachers will be supported through instructional coaching and frameworks, and all staff will be engaged and developed to believe in EVSC's vision. Systems and structures will foster collaborative continuous improvement across
The document discusses teaching organization and lesson planning. It provides guidance on developing effective lesson plans in three stages: pre-lesson preparation including setting goals and understanding student entry levels, lesson planning and implementation including objectives and instructional procedures, and post-lesson activities such as evaluating lessons. The document emphasizes that lesson plans provide organization for managing classroom time and instruction, while allowing flexibility for teacher innovation. Precise preparation must allow for adaptive delivery.
This document provides guidelines for Arizona's teacher evaluation process based on the state's framework for measuring educator effectiveness. It outlines three main components of the evaluation: teaching performance, student academic progress data, and survey data. It also describes operational definitions, the evaluation process which includes beginning and end of year conferences to set goals and determine performance classifications, as well as examples of weighting the different components. Appendices provide additional resources like evaluation rubrics and forms.
This document discusses the multi-year partnership approach of Partners in School Innovation to transform low-performing schools. It focuses on building adult capacity in three domains - results-oriented leadership, systems for professional learning, and strengthening the core instructional program. The organization works shoulder-to-shoulder with school staff for 3-5 years to develop these areas through continuous support and monitoring of implementation. The report then describes results from three schools that partnered with the organization, finding improvements in two schools that confirm the theory of impact but mixed results in one school despite implementing the approach comprehensively.
Staff development that improves learning for all students uses student data to determine priorities for teacher learning. It focuses on instruction, curriculum, and assessment. The staff development is also informed by multiple sources and its impact is demonstrated. It prepares educators to apply educational research when selecting content and processes. Appropriate adult learning strategies are used depending on the intended goals, and knowledge of human learning and change is applied. Educators are provided skills to collaborate, which can deepen learning and support problem solving.
Professional Learning Communities and Collaboration as a Vehicle to School Transformation - presented by Partners in School Innovation and Alum Rock Union Elementary School District at the California Department of Education Title 1 Conference in March 2014.
Shaping the future of CPD: How professional learning can support recruitment ...Katie Eldridge
Tim Matthews, Deputy Head at Oriel High School talks about how and why he believes that professional learning is key to employing and keeping staff in his school.
An INSET presentation to Heads of Department on How to Conduct Teacher Appraisal by Mark Steed, Principal of Berkhamsted School.
The INSET relates to the Berkhamsted Schools Group model for Teacher appraisal.
The document describes the services of Instructional Growth, which provides professional development and support to help districts improve teacher effectiveness and student growth. They offer 1) needs assessments and strategic planning, 2) professional development based on identified needs areas, and 3) sustained support through coaching and follow-up sessions. Their services include large group seminars, small group sessions, instructional coaching, and leadership support. They utilize an Instructional Growth Framework focusing on growth mindset, learning climate, instruction, assessment, differentiation, and sustained support.
Leveraging technology to personalize student learningitslearning, inc.
The document discusses personalizing student learning through technology. It defines personalization as understanding students' unique interests, styles, and needs to make learning meaningful. Personalized learning promotes student agency by giving them power over digital tools to account for their learning preferences, motivations, and goals. Effective digital tools support this purpose. The document also discusses allowing students to track their mastery progression with visible expectations and feedback, providing flexible learning environments where students can shift according to needs and connect with different audiences and experiences, facilitating communication and collaboration, and giving students ownership over their learning through involvement in the process, voice, choice, and self-reflection on goals.
This document discusses using cultural diversity and understanding to customize learning. Chapter 6 emphasizes differentiating instruction to meet individual student needs rather than a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Teachers are challenged to find methods that reach each student using various mediums. Chapter 11 focuses on recognizing cultural differences in the classroom and providing equitable access to technology. The teacher must promote cultural awareness and access to tools to help all students succeed. Assistive technologies, discussed in both chapters, are often required for students with IEPs to support their learning.
1. Select an indicator. Read the Wise Ways. Now focus on the literal meaning of the indicator.
2. How would you assess the current level of implementation of this indicator in your school?
___ No development or implementation
___ Limited development
___ Full implementation
Indistar® is a web-based tool that guides a district or school team in charting its improvement and managing the continuous improvement process. You might call it a change management tool. Indistar® is a platform adapted by each State to fit its needs. Indistar® is called different things in different states. For example, Illinois calls it Rising Star, Alaska calls it STEPP, Idaho and Oklahoma call it the WISE tool, and the Bureau of Indian Education calls it Native Star. The system is also tailored for the purposes of each state, its districts, and its schools.
Indistar® states include in their systems between 20 and 40 district indicators and between 80 and 100 school indicators. Since the school list is more extensive, let’s consider how the work of a school Leadership Team might be paced to cover all of these indicators in a reasonable amount of time.
This document discusses indicators for district support of school improvement. It addresses how the district involves community stakeholders in planning, provides incentives for hard-to-staff schools, intervenes early for struggling schools, and allows school autonomy. It also discusses how the district examines existing strategies, ensures improvement plans use research-based programs, and prepares for challenges during the change process. Finally, it outlines how the district clarifies decision-making authority and expectations for communication and professional development between the district and schools.
How school leadership teams guide their schools’ continuous improvement
And how Coaches and Capacity Builders support their work
School improvement is typically driven by a school-based leadership team. Scrutiny of student learning data informs their decisions and plans. An annual school improvement plan is their primary roadmap. The plan is created and followed for a year, then the cycle starts again. These plans begin by addressing specific subgroups of students and subject areas where the annual assessment shows weakness. The goal is to improve the scores that are low.
Kamlesh Chandra has over 20 years of experience in the education field, working as a director, trainer, facilitator, coach, and mentor. He focuses on data-driven school improvement, setting goals, and monitoring progress to increase student achievement. Some of his strengths include shaping visions of success, cultivating leadership in others, and improving organizational and instructional effectiveness through managing resources, people, and processes.
The document is a quality of work checklist that assesses indicators across two steps - assessment and monitoring. It collects information on the number of indicators analyzed, the number determined to be fully implemented in each step, and uses ratings to evaluate the candor of assessments and adequacy of evidence provided for full implementation determinations. The checklist aims to evaluate the process used to assess indicators and quality of evidence.
Select an indicator. Read the Wise Ways. Now focus on the literal meaning of the indicator.
2. How would you assess the current level of implementation of this indicator in your district?
___ No development or implementation
___ Limited development
___ Full implementation
This document outlines a continuous improvement planning session to identify effective practices and opportunities for growth at a school. It discusses strengthening leadership for all faculty, providing staff development, including foreign faculty in meetings through translation, and clearly sharing goals and expectations. The action plan will draw on theories of critical success factors and leadership to develop the faculty, goals, teamwork, and monitoring processes.
This document presents the Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation's (EVSC) five-year continuous improvement plan called "Maximizing Potential: Blueprint for Student Success 2016-2021". The plan aims to maximize student learning and close achievement gaps by prioritizing student learning through a framework called GAIN, investing in staff professional development, and ensuring strategic alignment of systems and processes through infrastructure improvements. Student learning will be advanced through developing student ownership of learning, implementing social-emotional learning and response to intervention programs, and refining rigorous standards-based lessons. Teachers will be supported through instructional coaching and frameworks, and all staff will be engaged and developed to believe in EVSC's vision. Systems and structures will foster collaborative continuous improvement across
The document discusses teaching organization and lesson planning. It provides guidance on developing effective lesson plans in three stages: pre-lesson preparation including setting goals and understanding student entry levels, lesson planning and implementation including objectives and instructional procedures, and post-lesson activities such as evaluating lessons. The document emphasizes that lesson plans provide organization for managing classroom time and instruction, while allowing flexibility for teacher innovation. Precise preparation must allow for adaptive delivery.
This document provides guidelines for Arizona's teacher evaluation process based on the state's framework for measuring educator effectiveness. It outlines three main components of the evaluation: teaching performance, student academic progress data, and survey data. It also describes operational definitions, the evaluation process which includes beginning and end of year conferences to set goals and determine performance classifications, as well as examples of weighting the different components. Appendices provide additional resources like evaluation rubrics and forms.
This document discusses the multi-year partnership approach of Partners in School Innovation to transform low-performing schools. It focuses on building adult capacity in three domains - results-oriented leadership, systems for professional learning, and strengthening the core instructional program. The organization works shoulder-to-shoulder with school staff for 3-5 years to develop these areas through continuous support and monitoring of implementation. The report then describes results from three schools that partnered with the organization, finding improvements in two schools that confirm the theory of impact but mixed results in one school despite implementing the approach comprehensively.
Staff development that improves learning for all students uses student data to determine priorities for teacher learning. It focuses on instruction, curriculum, and assessment. The staff development is also informed by multiple sources and its impact is demonstrated. It prepares educators to apply educational research when selecting content and processes. Appropriate adult learning strategies are used depending on the intended goals, and knowledge of human learning and change is applied. Educators are provided skills to collaborate, which can deepen learning and support problem solving.
Professional Learning Communities and Collaboration as a Vehicle to School Transformation - presented by Partners in School Innovation and Alum Rock Union Elementary School District at the California Department of Education Title 1 Conference in March 2014.
Shaping the future of CPD: How professional learning can support recruitment ...Katie Eldridge
Tim Matthews, Deputy Head at Oriel High School talks about how and why he believes that professional learning is key to employing and keeping staff in his school.
An INSET presentation to Heads of Department on How to Conduct Teacher Appraisal by Mark Steed, Principal of Berkhamsted School.
The INSET relates to the Berkhamsted Schools Group model for Teacher appraisal.
The document describes the services of Instructional Growth, which provides professional development and support to help districts improve teacher effectiveness and student growth. They offer 1) needs assessments and strategic planning, 2) professional development based on identified needs areas, and 3) sustained support through coaching and follow-up sessions. Their services include large group seminars, small group sessions, instructional coaching, and leadership support. They utilize an Instructional Growth Framework focusing on growth mindset, learning climate, instruction, assessment, differentiation, and sustained support.
Leveraging technology to personalize student learningitslearning, inc.
The document discusses personalizing student learning through technology. It defines personalization as understanding students' unique interests, styles, and needs to make learning meaningful. Personalized learning promotes student agency by giving them power over digital tools to account for their learning preferences, motivations, and goals. Effective digital tools support this purpose. The document also discusses allowing students to track their mastery progression with visible expectations and feedback, providing flexible learning environments where students can shift according to needs and connect with different audiences and experiences, facilitating communication and collaboration, and giving students ownership over their learning through involvement in the process, voice, choice, and self-reflection on goals.
This document discusses using cultural diversity and understanding to customize learning. Chapter 6 emphasizes differentiating instruction to meet individual student needs rather than a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Teachers are challenged to find methods that reach each student using various mediums. Chapter 11 focuses on recognizing cultural differences in the classroom and providing equitable access to technology. The teacher must promote cultural awareness and access to tools to help all students succeed. Assistive technologies, discussed in both chapters, are often required for students with IEPs to support their learning.
The document discusses digital pedagogy and its role in education. It begins by explaining how technology has influenced learning through digital tools that allow for self-paced, interactive, and personalized learning. This has led to the development of digital pedagogy, which integrates technology into the teaching-learning process in an active way. It then discusses three key aspects of determining the extent of digital pedagogy: 1) identifying one's digital pedagogy orientation; 2) determining the level of digital pedagogy practice; and 3) evaluating digital pedagogy competence through technology skills. Overall, the document emphasizes that digital pedagogy considers technology not just as a learning tool but as an integral part of the pedagog
The document discusses the roles and functions of educational technology in 21st century education. It outlines that instruction should be student-centered, collaborative, and have real-world context to prepare students for an increasingly digital world. Educational technology can improve teaching and learning, enhance educational goals, train teachers, develop curricula and materials, and help identify community needs. It allows for ubiquitous access to information, social interaction, and sharing of digital content.
English language learning for engineering students with internet based projectsAlexander Decker
This document describes an approach to teaching English to engineering students using internet-based projects. It involves having students work in groups to plan and research a hypothetical business trip to America. Students determine flight, hotel, activity and dining reservations by researching online. They also research American business culture and etiquette. The goal is for students to improve their English skills while gaining experience with project-based and self-directed learning. Assessment involves group presentations and consideration of fluency, preparation, and meeting task requirements. The approach aims to make learning more student-centered and motivate students by applying English to a realistic scenario.
INNOVATION OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE TEACHERSAJHSSR Journal
ABSTRACT: This is descriptive research employed quantitative and qualitative elements as it explored the
innovations implemented and the administrative support provided among the senior high school science teachers
in Castilla, Sorsogon Philippines. The study obtained data from the thirty purposively selected Senior High
School Science Teachers through interview and survey and were analyzed and interpreted using simple statistics
like frequency count, percentage, and ranking as well as thematic analysis and presented using tables and
narratives. The study revealed innovations in terms of teaching strategies which include:“Modified Group
Dynamics-based on online games characters, robots (acting out) use in groupings and role playing” , “Memesbased Picture Analysis”, and “Social media-based Teaching Strategy using Likes, Shares, Comments”.; in
terms of LearningAssessment, the minimal innovations include; Modified 4 pics 1-word, (role playing,
contest/games), Projects with social media integration (posting of projects in their Social Media accounts/class
FB pages), and Adapted Online learning applications (kahoot.com). alongSchool Management of and
Projects linkages to some international private advocacy organization eg.Intervida and Green Valey were
revealed. There were minimal administrative support to innovations related activities: along Facilities and
Equipment, Sources of Fund, Capability-building activities, and Rewards and Incentives. The innovations
made students view their learning activities as; “Active and engaging”, “Motivating and insightful”, and
“Going beyond the minimum”.
KEYWORDS :Innovations, Senior High School Science Teachers, Teaching Strategies, Learning Assessment,
School Management of projects.
Roles and Functions of Educational Technology in the 21st century EducationRheychill Montefalco
This document discusses the role of educational technology in improving education. It states that educational technology analyzes the teaching and learning process, identifies variables that impact it, and helps establish better relationships between teaching and learning. It facilitates learning in less time by drawing on theories from different fields. Educational technology also helps determine appropriate objectives and curriculum for education based on changes in environment and society. It assists in training teachers and identifying problems in education to help remedy issues and improve the evaluation process through feedback. Overall, educational technology aims to enhance the teaching and learning process.
This qualitative research emphasized learning strategies in the process of full
engagement by students and discovering the implementation of learning,
science process skills, and learners' creativity. The selection of contextual
teaching and learning methods due to teachers having a role more in strategy
affairs while learners were more focused on self-actualization of practice in
their groups. Here, there was an interaction between teachers and learners to
complement each other. The participant was student of class five Elementary
School/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Ma'arif 37 Sunan Kalijogo, Ambulu, Jember
Regency, Indonesia. Methods of data collection were interviews,
observations, and documentation. Data collection was related to natural
science subjects. The study results showed the procedures for implementing
contextual teaching and learning in natural science subjects. Applying
contextual teaching and learning methods was very effective in natural
science subjects. The findings of this study showed that improving the
quality of learning and learning support facilities can realize the ability of
competence of students and teacher professionalism.
The Why And The What Of Personalised LearningJohn Pallister
The document discusses the concept of personalised learning, which aims to tailor education to individual students' needs and interests. It explores the drivers behind personalised learning such as improving outcomes for all students. Personalised learning involves students having input into what, how and when they learn. It requires assessing students' needs, providing choice in curriculum, and flexible learning environments supported by technology. The goal is for students to become effective, self-managed lifelong learners through a system focused on their development.
ROLES AND FUNCTIONS OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN 21ST CENTURY EDUCATIONlynlynpaquibot
This document discusses the role of technology in 21st century education. It argues that education should prepare students to be active, successful members of society. It suggests that schools consider having students gather information on their own under teacher guidance, engage in hands-on learning and collaboration, and see how skills can be applied outside of school. Technology is presented as a tool for fact-based learning and research skills. The document also outlines important functions of educational technology such as improving teaching and learning, enhancing educational goals, developing curriculum and materials, and identifying community needs.
ROLES AND FUNCTION OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN 21ST CENTURY EDUCATIONlynlynpaquibot
This document discusses the role of technology in 21st century education. It argues that education should prepare students to be active, successful members of society. Students should gather information independently and collaborate with others, while teachers provide guidance. Learning involves hands-on activities and discovery rather than just memorization. Technology is an important tool that provides easy access to information and allows for different learning styles. It can enhance skills like research that students will need in future education and careers.
Roles and functions of educational technology in the 21st century educationGlory Fe Alcantara
The document discusses the roles and functions of educational technology in 21st century education. It states that instruction should be student-centered by focusing on active and collaborative learning. Education should also be collaborative, with students working together on projects. Finally, learning needs to have context and be relevant to students' lives. The document also outlines key functions of educational technology, including improving teaching and learning, developing curriculum and materials, and identifying community needs. Overall, the document advocates for using technology comprehensively to support innovative teaching, learning, and education systems.
This document discusses differentiated instruction, a teaching strategy that aims to meet the individual needs of students. It conducted research in Lebanon to determine if differentiated instruction improved student achievement and satisfaction. The research found that differentiated instruction based on learning styles, interests, and choice was most effective in boosting achievement and engagement. For education to be truly effective, it recommends that teachers understand each student's unique abilities and tailor instruction accordingly rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach.
The document discusses the author's views on educational philosophy and the ideal classroom environment. It emphasizes that teachers should understand students' different learning styles and the importance of integrating technology to meet the needs of all students, including those with disabilities. An ideal classroom would have a circular seating arrangement, diverse technological resources, and be designed to facilitate hands-on and collaborative learning.
The National Competency-Based Standards for Teachers outlines 7 domains for effective teaching: 1) Social Regard for Learning, which focuses on teachers serving as positive role models for learning. 2) Learning Environment, which focuses on creating an environment where all students can learn. 3) Diversity of Learners, which emphasizes recognizing individual differences to design diverse learning activities. 4) Curriculum, which refers to elements that help students attain curricular goals. 5) Planning, Assessing and Reporting, which focuses on using assessment to plan teaching and ensure appropriate learning. 6) Community Linkages, which focuses on meaningfully linking school to students' communities. 7) Personal Growth and Professional Development, which emphasizes valuing continuous improvement as a
The document summarizes the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards and the National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers. The NC standards establish a basis for teacher preparation, evaluation, and development. They aim to help students learn 21st century skills and content. The standards address leadership, establishing a respectful environment, content knowledge, facilitating learning, reflection, and student success. The NETS standards define technology skills and knowledge needed for digital-age teaching and learning. They focus on student creativity, designing assessments, modeling digital work and learning, promoting digital citizenship, and engaging in professional growth.
The document discusses the role of technology in 21st century education. It argues that technology allows for 24/7 access to information, constant social interaction, and easily created and shared digital content. It also outlines important functions of educational technology, including improving teaching and learning, enhancing educational goals, training teachers, developing curriculum and teaching materials, and identifying community needs. Technology is presented as a tool for fact-based learning that allows students to research using the internet while developing valuable research skills.
The document discusses the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards and the National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers. The NC standards were created to provide a basis for teacher preparation, evaluation, and development and help students learn 21st century skills. The standards address leadership, establishing a respectful environment, content knowledge, facilitating learning, reflection, and student success. The NETS standards were issued to define new skills and knowledge needed to teach and learn in the digital age, and address facilitating student learning with technology, designing digital learning assessments, modeling digital work and learning, promoting digital citizenship, and engaging in professional growth regarding technology.
just for the help of students like me and...mahnoor01999
This document provides a comparative analysis of traditional teaching methods versus interactive learning approaches. It examines the key aspects of each, including learning approach, student engagement, content delivery, assessment, and interactivity. Traditional teaching relies on lectures and textbooks with passive learning, while interactive methods emphasize active student participation and collaboration using technology. Both have advantages and disadvantages regarding student engagement, feedback, and costs. The conclusion states the future of education involves leveraging the strengths of each to create a balanced educational environment adapted to changing needs.
Blended learning environments the effectiveness in developing concepts and th...Alexander Decker
This document discusses blended learning and its effectiveness in developing concepts and thinking skills. It defines blended learning as combining online and traditional learning, taking advantage of different learning theories. There are five key components of blended learning identified: teacher-led interactions, self-paced interactions, collaborative activities, pre-assessments, and supplemental materials. The philosophy of blended learning is to utilize technology to create new learning situations and simulate active, individualized, learner-centered education. It has advantages like flexibility, increased participation, and better communication compared to solely online or traditional approaches.
Similar to Indistar® Personalized Learning Indicators (20)
The document describes Indistar, a platform that guides school district leadership teams in improving professional practices. It focuses on districts supporting school success through seven effective practices with indicators. Leadership teams assess performance against the indicators and work towards full implementation. The document outlines district success markers and progress pacing, which provide guideposts for implementation fidelity. It lists the seven effective practices and their indicators that leadership teams work to implement.
This summary provides an overview of a conversation between a teacher and her friend about personalized learning:
1. The teacher feels frustrated that she cannot keep up with the changing demands of her profession and personalize learning for her diverse students. She questions how to effectively use technology, organize flexible learning pathways, and meet all of her students' individual needs.
2. Her friend reassures her that she already personalizes learning through her strong relationships with students and deep understanding of their interests, needs, and pacing. While technology can help, the teacher's role remains central.
3. The handbook emphasizes that personalized learning is built upon caring teacher-student relationships, student engagement, and developing students' cognitive, metac
The document outlines indicators for family engagement at schools. It discusses how school leadership teams and parent-teacher organizations involve parents in decision making. It also describes goals and roles like compacts outlining teacher, parent, and student responsibilities, homework guidelines, and ways to recognize accomplishments. Additionally, it lists ways schools communicate with families through key documents, teacher-family contacts, and school-family updates. The document provides indicators for how schools can educate parents through parent-child activities, a family resource library, training volunteers, and parent workshops. It also describes ways schools can connect with families through open houses, parent-teacher conferences, family-school nights, home visits, and spaces for parents to meet.
The document outlines 14 indicators for how a school can integrate and promote Native American culture, history, language, and values. Key aspects include providing staff training on local tribal culture and history, having tribal mentors, reflecting tribal culture in the school's appearance, integrating Native culture into lessons and curriculum, including tribal elders in school events, teaching tribal language basics to all students, and promoting Native culture with respect for other groups.
If Scott Dual Language Magnet Elementary School in Topeka, Kansas, were to write a six-word memoir, it might sound like this: Blacklist to waitlist in two years; or, Built from strengths, success soon followed.
This document outlines success markers for states to measure their implementation of Indistar, a web-based platform for school improvement. It includes markers in the areas of leadership and decision making, and support for districts and schools. A state's degree of implementation is calculated by the percentage of success markers marked "yes." The document also lists district success markers focused on the district leadership team's regular meetings to review data and indicators and support school improvement.
This document provides instructions for generating a Progress Query Report to identify schools or districts that meet certain criteria. The user selects the variable to include in the report, enters criteria to define the variable, then generates the report which can then be exported or printed.
The drilldown report allows users to view assessment, plan, and achievement data at the school or district level for indicator implementation. Users can choose either the school or district report, then select between all districts or a specific one. Clicking on a school or district name in the report takes the user to the QuickScore report which provides additional details about leadership, meetings, indicator implementation, and coaching comments.
These reports provide aggregate data on all school and district teams' progress in assessing, planning for, and achieving indicators. The reports show the number of districts or schools that have been in the system for different lengths of time and include a color-coded bar graph of the number of indicators assessed, planned, and achieved. The state education agency can use this information to determine if districts and schools are on track, if progress is being made over time, and what next steps or celebrations may be needed.
Submitted Reports allows users to view all reports submitted by districts and individual schools for the current or previous school years. Users can filter the reports by school year, district, school group, and see if reports were submitted on time. Reports are listed alphabetically and can be sorted by submission to identify schools that did or did not turn reports in. The tool provides transparency into report submission across districts and schools.
This document discusses data mining. It mentions data mining three times but provides no other details about the topic. The document contains numbers but no context for what they refer to. Overall, the document gives a very limited amount of information and its key points cannot be determined from the content provided.
The Display Progress report in INDIstar allows users to view the progress schools and districts have made in entering information. It shows the latest dates that key components were entered and allows sorting based on those dates. It also allows viewing any files schools have uploaded by clicking the file icon. The report provides a quick way to check completion of process components for schools, compare progress across districts, and see supporting files from individual schools.
This document explains how state administrators can use the login activity feature to monitor which stakeholders are logging into their school and district Indistar pages. Administrators can view all login activity or filter by district, school, access level, and timeframe. This allows administrators to check which stakeholders, coaches, schools, and districts are regularly logging in and accessing the pages.
This document provides an overview of the tools and features available to state administrators in the Indistar system. It describes how state administrators can view submitted reports and feedback from schools and districts. It also explains how administrators can monitor school and district activity and progress, view login activity, run informational reports, drill down to view school and district data, and send bulletins to recipients.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptxKavitha Krishnan
In an education system, it is understood that assessment is only for the students, but on the other hand, the Assessment of teachers is also an important aspect of the education system that ensures teachers are providing high-quality instruction to students. The assessment process can be used to provide feedback and support for professional development, to inform decisions about teacher retention or promotion, or to evaluate teacher effectiveness for accountability purposes.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
2. Page 2 of 6
7. All teachers use online curricula whose goals are measureable and clearly state what students
will know or do at the end of instruction.
8. All teachers regularly add new content and teaching suggestions to the online learning content
catalog.
9. All teachers use online, hybrid, or blended learning as a part of a larger pedagogical approach
that combines the effective socialization opportunities within the classroom with the enhanced
learning opportunities available in online instruction.
10. All teachers enable students to place selected work into a digital portfolio that is updated
throughout the student’s school experiences and provides a picture of interests, skills,
competencies, and growth over time.
B. Blended Learning— Effective Practice: Mixing traditional classroom instruction with online delivery
of instruction and content, including learning activities outside the school, granting the student a
degree of control over time, place, pace, and/or path.
Indicators
1. All teachers receive initial and ongoing training and support in effective use of blended learning
methods.
2. Instructional teams determine which blended learning model is appropriate for the school or
individual classroom.
3. All teachers build students’ ability to learn in contexts other than school.
4. All teachers connects students’ out‐of‐school learning with their school learning.
5. Hardware, web browser and software requirements are specified to students and parents
before the use of online instruction outside of school.
6. All teachers employing blended learning methods make sure that technology and data enhance
relationships, but do not pretend to substitute for them.
7. Instructional teams and teachers use fine‐grained data to design for each student a learning
path tailored to that student’s prior learning, personal interests, and aspirations.
C. Cognitive Competency— Effective Practice: Intentionally addressing students’ accessible
background knowledge to facilitate new learning.
Indicators
In the School Community
1. The School Community Council ensures that all parents understand the purpose of a standards‐
aligned curriculum, their own children’s progress, and their role in supporting learning at home.
2. The School Community Council ensures that all volunteers understand cognitive competency
and their roles relative to its enhancement in students.
3. Page 3 of 6
In the School (curriculum and school culture)
3. All teachers and teacher teams plan instruction based on the aligned and expanded curriculum that
includes rich reading, writing, memorization, and vocabulary development.
4. All staff conducting co‐curricular programs fulfill the purposes of the programs including appropriate
elements of the aligned curriculum and other cognitive competency activities.
5. The school’s key documents explain the value of cognitive competency and how it is enhanced through
specific roles and relationships.
6. The school promotes cognitive competency in school rituals and routines, such as morning
announcements, awards assemblies, hallway and classroom wall displays, and student competitions.
In the Classroom (instruction, classroom culture, classroom management)
7. All teachers reinforce elements of mastered knowledge that can be retained in memory through
recitation, review, questioning, and inclusion in subsequent assignments.
8. All teachers include vocabulary development (general vocabulary and terms specific to the subject) as
learning objectives.
9. All teachers assign rich reading and the application of the reading in written work and discussion.
D. Metacognitive Competency— Effective Practice: Providing instruction and modeling of
metacognitive processes and strategies to enhance student self‐management of learning.
Indicators
In the School Community
1. The School Community Council ensures that all parents understand metacognitive competency,
learning strategies, and ways they can support their children’s self‐management of learning at
home.
2. The School Community Council ensures that all volunteers understand metacognitive
competency and their roles relative to its enhancement in students.
In the School (curriculum and school culture)
3. All teachers and teacher teams plan instruction based on the aligned and expanded curriculum that
includes objectives for student management of their learning.
4. All staff conducting co‐curricular programs fulfill the purposes of the programs including appropriate
elements of student management of learning.
5. The school’s key documents explain the value of metacognitive competency and how it is enhanced
through specific roles and relationships.
6. The school promotes metacognitive competency in school rituals and routines, such as morning
announcements, awards assemblies, hallway and classroom wall displays, and student competitions.
4. Page 4 of 6
In the Classroom (instruction, classroom culture, classroom management)
7. All teachers teach and model the metacognitive process (goals, strategies, monitoring, and modification)
and specific learning strategies and techniques.
8. All teachers include self‐checks, peer‐checks, and documentation of learning strategies as part of
assignment completion.
9. All teachers teach methods of logic, synthesis, evaluation, and divergent thinking.
10. The teacher builds students’ metacognitive skills by teaching learning strategies and their
appropriate application.
11. The teacher builds students’ metacognitive skills by providing students with processes for
determining their own mastery of learning tasks.
12. The teacher builds students’ ability to use a variety of learning tools.
E. Motivational Competency— Effective Practice: Promoting a growth mindset, stretching students’
interests, connecting learning to student aspirations, and differentiating instruction to enhance
students’ engagement and persistence with learning.
Indicators
In the School Community
1. The School Community Council ensures that all parents understand motivational competency (a
growth mindset, the value of mastery, and connecting learning tasks with students’ personal
aspirations) and how they can enhance motivational competency at home.
2. The School Community Council ensures that all volunteers understand motivational competency
and their roles relative to its enhancement in students.
In the School (curriculum and school culture)
3. All teachers and teacher teams plan instruction with a curriculum guide that includes methods to enhance
student motivation to learn.
4. All staff conducting co‐curricular programs fulfill the purposes of the programs including appropriate
elements of student motivation to learn.
5. The school’s key documents explain the value of motivational competency and how it is enhanced
through specific roles and relationships.
6. The school promotes motivational competency in school rituals and routines, such as morning
announcements, awards assemblies, hallway and classroom wall displays, and student competitions.
In the Classroom (instruction, classroom culture, classroom management)
7. All teachers promote a growth mindset by attributing learning success to effort and self‐regulation and
insist upon (and reward) persistence to mastery.
5. Page 5 of 6
8. All teachers encourage self‐direction by giving students choice in the selection of topics and the
application of learning strategies.
9. The teacher helps students articulate their personal aspirations and connect their learning to
the pursuit of these aspirations.
10. All teachers stretch students’ interests to find value in new topics and connect learning tasks to students’
personal aspirations.
11. All teachers differentiate assignments to provide the right balance of challenge and attainability for each
student.
F. Social/Emotional Competency—Effective Practice: Providing instruction, modeling, classroom
norms, and caring attention that promotes students’ self‐respect, management of emotions,
concern for others, and responsibility.
Indicators
In the School Community
1. The School Community Council ensures that all parents understand social/emotional
competency and their role in enhancing their children’s growth in (1) understanding and
managing emotions, (2) setting and achieving positive goals, (3) feeling and showing empathy
for others, (4) establishing and maintaining positive relationships, and (5) making responsible
decisions.
2. The School Community Council ensures that all volunteers understand social/emotional
competency and their roles relative to its enhancement in students.
In the School (curriculum and school culture)
3. All teachers and teacher teams plan instruction with a curriculum guide that includes objectives for
social/emotional competency.
4. All staff conducting co‐curricular programs fulfill the purposes of the programs including appropriate
elements of social/emotional competency.
5. The school selects, implements, and evaluates evidenced‐based programs that enhance social/ emotional
competency.
6. The school’s key documents explain the value of social/ emotional competency and how it is enhanced
through specific roles and relationships.
7. The school promotes social/ emotional competency in school rituals and routines, such as morning
announcements, awards assemblies, hallway and classroom wall displays, and student competitions.
In the Classroom (instruction, classroom culture, classroom management)
8. All teachers teach and reinforce positive social skills, self‐respect, relationships, and responsibility for the
consequences of decisions and actions.