Indistar® Quality of Work Checklist and Assessment
•
0 likes•27,082 views
The document is a quality of work checklist that assesses indicators across two steps - assessment and monitoring. It collects information on the number of indicators analyzed, the number determined to be fully implemented in each step, and uses ratings to evaluate the candor of assessments and adequacy of evidence provided for full implementation determinations. The checklist aims to evaluate the process used to assess indicators and quality of evidence.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Indistar® District Assessing Indicators 
Select an indicator. Read the Wise Ways. Now focus on the literal meaning of the indicator.
2. How would you assess the current level of implementation of this indicator in your district?
___ No development or implementation
___ Limited development
___ Full implementation
Indistar® Coaching with Indicators
How school leadership teams guide their schools’ continuous improvement
And how Coaches and Capacity Builders support their work
School improvement is typically driven by a school-based leadership team. Scrutiny of student learning data informs their decisions and plans. An annual school improvement plan is their primary roadmap. The plan is created and followed for a year, then the cycle starts again. These plans begin by addressing specific subgroups of students and subject areas where the annual assessment shows weakness. The goal is to improve the scores that are low.
Indistar® School Assessing Indicators
1. Select an indicator. Read the Wise Ways. Now focus on the literal meaning of the indicator.
2. How would you assess the current level of implementation of this indicator in your school?
___ No development or implementation
___ Limited development
___ Full implementation
Making Indistar® Work for You
Indistar® is a web-based tool that guides a district or school team in charting its improvement and managing the continuous improvement process. You might call it a change management tool. Indistar® is a platform adapted by each State to fit its needs. Indistar® is called different things in different states. For example, Illinois calls it Rising Star, Alaska calls it STEPP, Idaho and Oklahoma call it the WISE tool, and the Bureau of Indian Education calls it Native Star. The system is also tailored for the purposes of each state, its districts, and its schools.
Indistar® Leadership Team Self-Assessment Rubric
The document is a self-assessment rubric to help schools evaluate their implementation of Indistar, specifically regarding the leadership team component. It provides descriptions of limited, full, and exemplary implementation for areas like leadership team composition, meeting frequency, agendas, minutes, selecting objectives, creating tasks, and monitoring progress. The purpose is to allow schools to self-reflect on implementing the leadership team key with fidelity in order to improve practices and student achievement.
Indistar® Seeing the Big Picture
The document describes the improvement process used in Indistar. It involves a leadership team that assesses professional practices and student outcomes to guide improvement. Instructional teams do the same at the classroom level. Coaches provide guidance and feedback to the leadership team based on data reviews. The process aims to improve adult performance to enhance student learning. It uses indicators of effective practice organized in domains and sections to track progress. Keys to success include regular review of data by leadership and instructional teams and guidance from coaches.
Suggested Indicators for Schools
The document provides an overview of Indistar, a school improvement platform that focuses on core school functions and effective practices. It outlines the school leadership team's role in regularly assessing the school's performance on various indicators and working toward their implementation. It lists school success markers related to the leadership team's work, as well as guidance on pacing school progress by focusing on key indicators. The remainder of the document provides details on specific school success indicators within core functions of leadership, curriculum/instruction, classroom instruction, and personalized learning.
Indistar® The Basics
1. Indistar is a web-based continuous improvement system adopted by state education agencies to provide clear expectations, resources, and a structured process to guide school and district leadership teams in candidly assessing practices and improving professional practice.
2. It provides indicators of effective practice organized into categories and allows teams to prioritize areas for improvement, access research briefs on indicators, and track progress over time.
3. State agencies can customize Indistar to their needs, provide coaching and feedback to schools and districts, and districts can in turn support schools as they work to implement more effective practices.
Recommended
Indistar® District Assessing Indicators
Select an indicator. Read the Wise Ways. Now focus on the literal meaning of the indicator.
2. How would you assess the current level of implementation of this indicator in your district?
___ No development or implementation
___ Limited development
___ Full implementation
Indistar® Coaching with Indicators
How school leadership teams guide their schools’ continuous improvement
And how Coaches and Capacity Builders support their work
School improvement is typically driven by a school-based leadership team. Scrutiny of student learning data informs their decisions and plans. An annual school improvement plan is their primary roadmap. The plan is created and followed for a year, then the cycle starts again. These plans begin by addressing specific subgroups of students and subject areas where the annual assessment shows weakness. The goal is to improve the scores that are low.
Indistar® School Assessing Indicators
1. Select an indicator. Read the Wise Ways. Now focus on the literal meaning of the indicator.
2. How would you assess the current level of implementation of this indicator in your school?
___ No development or implementation
___ Limited development
___ Full implementation
Making Indistar® Work for You
Indistar® is a web-based tool that guides a district or school team in charting its improvement and managing the continuous improvement process. You might call it a change management tool. Indistar® is a platform adapted by each State to fit its needs. Indistar® is called different things in different states. For example, Illinois calls it Rising Star, Alaska calls it STEPP, Idaho and Oklahoma call it the WISE tool, and the Bureau of Indian Education calls it Native Star. The system is also tailored for the purposes of each state, its districts, and its schools.
Indistar® Leadership Team Self-Assessment Rubric
The document is a self-assessment rubric to help schools evaluate their implementation of Indistar, specifically regarding the leadership team component. It provides descriptions of limited, full, and exemplary implementation for areas like leadership team composition, meeting frequency, agendas, minutes, selecting objectives, creating tasks, and monitoring progress. The purpose is to allow schools to self-reflect on implementing the leadership team key with fidelity in order to improve practices and student achievement.
Indistar® Seeing the Big Picture
The document describes the improvement process used in Indistar. It involves a leadership team that assesses professional practices and student outcomes to guide improvement. Instructional teams do the same at the classroom level. Coaches provide guidance and feedback to the leadership team based on data reviews. The process aims to improve adult performance to enhance student learning. It uses indicators of effective practice organized in domains and sections to track progress. Keys to success include regular review of data by leadership and instructional teams and guidance from coaches.
Suggested Indicators for Schools
The document provides an overview of Indistar, a school improvement platform that focuses on core school functions and effective practices. It outlines the school leadership team's role in regularly assessing the school's performance on various indicators and working toward their implementation. It lists school success markers related to the leadership team's work, as well as guidance on pacing school progress by focusing on key indicators. The remainder of the document provides details on specific school success indicators within core functions of leadership, curriculum/instruction, classroom instruction, and personalized learning.
Indistar® The Basics
1. Indistar is a web-based continuous improvement system adopted by state education agencies to provide clear expectations, resources, and a structured process to guide school and district leadership teams in candidly assessing practices and improving professional practice.
2. It provides indicators of effective practice organized into categories and allows teams to prioritize areas for improvement, access research briefs on indicators, and track progress over time.
3. State agencies can customize Indistar to their needs, provide coaching and feedback to schools and districts, and districts can in turn support schools as they work to implement more effective practices.
Indistar® Pacing the Work for SEAs
Indistar® states include in their systems between 20 and 40 district indicators and between 80 and 100 school indicators. Since the school list is more extensive, let’s consider how the work of a school Leadership Team might be paced to cover all of these indicators in a reasonable amount of time.
Indistar® Instructional team Self-Assessment Rubric
School improvement is premised on the firm belief that it is best accomplished when directed by the people closest to the students,
including classroom teachers, specialists, and school administrators. When working collaboratively in Instructional Teams, rather than
in isolation, they positively impact student achievement (Hattie, 2009). Research-based indicators of effective practice help guide
instructional teams to do their work. This process begins by establishing structures and organization for effective meetings. Once
these have been established, the teams turn to the work of developing standards-aligned units of instruction, among other tasks.
Indistar® Coaches and Capacity Builders
We will use the term “coach” to apply to the people external to the district who provide ongoing support for a District Leadership Team and the people external to the school who provide ongoing support for a School Leadership Team. In some cases, the person is called a “coach,” and in other cases the term may be “capacity builder” or “specialist.” In coaching with Indistar®, your learners are primarily the principal and School Leadership Team. Or, if you are coaching a district team, then your learners are the superintendent and District Leadership Team. Of course, the work of the Leadership Team fans out to engage everyone in the district or school community, so the coach is always mindful of the ways the Leadership Team’s lessons learned are internalized by others, how the Leadership Team’s objectives are explained to everyone, and how the Leadership Team supports each person’s mastery and application of effective practice.
Indistar® State Implementation Success Markers
The document outlines success markers for a state's implementation of Indistar, which is a software platform used for school and district improvement planning. It provides a checklist for states to indicate the degree to which they have implemented various leadership structures and support systems related to Indistar. Key aspects include designating a state Indistar leader and administrative team to oversee implementation, providing a state Indistar team to support districts and schools, engaging districts to use Indistar for their own improvement, and providing Indistar coaches to assist identified schools and districts. States can calculate their overall degree of implementation based on the percentage of success markers indicated as "Yes".
Indistar® District Level Indicators
This document discusses indicators for district support of school improvement. It addresses how the district involves community stakeholders in planning, provides incentives for hard-to-staff schools, intervenes early for struggling schools, and allows school autonomy. It also discusses how the district examines existing strategies, ensures improvement plans use research-based programs, and prepares for challenges during the change process. Finally, it outlines how the district clarifies decision-making authority and expectations for communication and professional development between the district and schools.
Indistar® Personalized Learning Indicators
The document discusses personalized learning and outlines effective practices and indicators for digital learning, blended learning, and developing students' cognitive, metacognitive, motivational, and social/emotional competencies. It describes personalized learning as instruction that is paced to individual needs, tailored to learning preferences, and tailored to specific student interests. The document then provides examples of indicators for how schools can effectively implement digital learning, blended learning, and develop various competencies through curriculum, instruction, school culture, and community involvement.
Assessment practices teacher performance
Assessment practices and teacher performance presented at Mid-Hudson Principals' Center Summer Leadership Institute
Indistar® As Innovation
Indistar was born in 2008, in one state for a select group of persistently low-achieving schools, and has since been changing and adapting and fitting to the contexts of 25 states and thousands of schools across the performance spectrum. We believe it is now poised to up the ante, to raise the stakes, to take a leap forward as a pesky little innovation machine. The innovators in this brave new world will be the states, districts, and schools that have been fitting Indistar to their particular contexts.
Student Employment Presentation
The document discusses resources and programs at Texas A&M University for student employment that focus on learning and reflection. It describes employer expectations for graduates and how the university supports connecting student jobs to academics through assessments, supervisor-student interviews, and trainings. Surveys found students reported growth in skills like teamwork, communication, and conflict resolution from pre- to post-employment. The university provides learning contracts, rubrics, reflections, and trainings to help students develop workplace skills and make connections between their jobs and coursework.
Differentiated Professional Development (Artifact)
This document outlines an induction training for new teachers. It includes an agenda for professional development sessions focused on establishing positive parent relations, analyzing student assessment data, and teaching organizational skills. The training will use activities like roleplaying parent communication, analyzing sample student test data, and creating lesson plans for teaching organizational skills. Formative feedback will be collected through parking lot notes, surveys, and exit slips to inform future professional development.
Akhani education whole school development model
The document outlines a framework and model for a whole school development program. It discusses the importance of a conducive learning environment with necessary infrastructure, teaching materials, and structured school operations. It also emphasizes that successful learning requires meeting students' basic needs like nutrition, uniforms, and transportation. The framework has four pillars: help-the-learner programs, school community capacity development, learning and teaching support materials, and school infrastructure projects. It describes the program design, grant-making, and monitoring/evaluation processes for implementing community investment projects.
6 steps to successful teacher appraisal
These 6 steps enhance and streamline your existing teacher appraisal/performance management process.
Teacher evaluation-web-1
This document provides guidelines for Arizona's teacher evaluation process based on the state's framework for measuring educator effectiveness. It outlines three main components of the evaluation: teaching performance, student academic progress data, and survey data. It also describes operational definitions, the evaluation process which includes beginning and end of year conferences to set goals and determine performance classifications, as well as examples of weighting the different components. Appendices provide additional resources like evaluation rubrics and forms.
Assessment
This document discusses assessment in education. It defines assessment as a process used to collect information to improve educational programs and student outcomes. There are three main types of assessment: formative assessment which occurs continuously to guide instruction, summative assessment which evaluates learning at the end of a unit, and authentic assessment which applies knowledge over time with clear criteria. The purposes and roles of assessment are to identify gaps in student learning and inform classroom teaching. Different strategies are used for each assessment type, such as quizzes and questioning for formative and exams or projects for summative. The goal of assessment is to continually improve academic progress.
Teacher induction programs | new teacher center
The document discusses teacher induction programs that are designed to help new teachers transition successfully into their roles and improve their effectiveness. It outlines the key components of successful induction programs, which include instructional mentoring, professional learning communities, engaged principals, and supportive school environments. The New Teacher Center works with districts and states to implement robust induction programs through various services, such as supporting program leaders, providing professional development for mentors, building principal capacity, using assessment tools to guide mentoring, and facilitating continuous program improvement through data analysis. The goal of induction programs is to enhance student achievement, accelerate teacher effectiveness, improve retention, and strengthen leadership.
Via Evaluation Evaluation Plan presentation for GPA
The document discusses evaluation plans and their importance. It provides an overview of what an evaluation plan is and when one is necessary, such as when required by a funder. It outlines the key components of an effective evaluation plan, including identifying the evaluator, developing objectives and indicators, creating a logic model and timeline. The presentation aims to help attendees understand how to create strong evaluation plans that can improve their projects and demonstrate accountability.
Ash Samadi - Blueprint for curriculum instruction
The document provides an overview of the Instructional Blueprint used by Diplomas Now to guide their work. The Blueprint lays out the foundation for teaching and learning, outlining evidence-based practices across assessment, curriculum, and instruction. It also states key tenets that inform all decisions related to these areas. School teams can use the Blueprint to reflect on how their current approaches align with or differ from its guidelines to help strengthen implementation.
Mills philosophy of assessment
This document discusses different types of assessments and their purposes. It outlines how formative assessments, like daily checks for understanding, are more useful for informing instruction compared to annual high-stakes tests. The document advocates for using common assessments in data teams to analyze student work, identify strengths and weaknesses, and determine best practices. It emphasizes that effective data teams regularly examine student data, evaluate instruction, set goals, and use teacher needs to guide improvement efforts.
Revised introduction to ee power point
The document introduces Shrewsbury Public Schools' new educator evaluation system which is being implemented to comply with Massachusetts state regulations and improve teaching and learning. The new five step evaluation cycle will involve goal setting, observations, feedback, and using measures such as student growth percentiles and surveys to provide an impact rating for educators. The district will pilot the new system with 50% of educators in 2013-2014 and fully implement it for all educators the following year.
Evaluation of training
This document discusses training evaluation. It begins by defining training evaluation and identifying its objectives: to define training evaluation, discuss its purpose, and identify different evaluation types. It then discusses that evaluation is a state of mind, not just techniques. The purposes of evaluation are feedback, control, and intervention. Evaluation can assess the training plan, process, and product. Different evaluation methods and tools are reviewed. The document advocates for evaluating all stages of training and discusses frameworks for doing so, including Kirkpatrick's model and evaluating achievement of targets, attracting resources, and satisfying interested parties. It argues that the important question is not why evaluate, but whether an organization can afford not to evaluate training activities.
Make your assessments more effective with test analytics
Talent assessment platform: http://bit.ly/2SYhZYS
Accurate screening of candidates is possible only
with a high-quality assessment. Building quality in
assessments takes time and requires a consistent
measure of the process against standards that
define its quality
first-batch-me-training.pptx
This document outlines the objectives and structure of a training on Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) skills and expertise for researchers. The training aims to build M&E capacity among researchers to strengthen development evaluation. It will cover M&E framework and tool development, as well as program and project evaluation. The training is expected to equip researchers with M&E skills and expertise to become M&E specialists or professional research consultants.
More Related Content
What's hot
Indistar® Pacing the Work for SEAs
Indistar® states include in their systems between 20 and 40 district indicators and between 80 and 100 school indicators. Since the school list is more extensive, let’s consider how the work of a school Leadership Team might be paced to cover all of these indicators in a reasonable amount of time.
Indistar® Instructional team Self-Assessment Rubric
School improvement is premised on the firm belief that it is best accomplished when directed by the people closest to the students,
including classroom teachers, specialists, and school administrators. When working collaboratively in Instructional Teams, rather than
in isolation, they positively impact student achievement (Hattie, 2009). Research-based indicators of effective practice help guide
instructional teams to do their work. This process begins by establishing structures and organization for effective meetings. Once
these have been established, the teams turn to the work of developing standards-aligned units of instruction, among other tasks.
Indistar® Coaches and Capacity Builders
We will use the term “coach” to apply to the people external to the district who provide ongoing support for a District Leadership Team and the people external to the school who provide ongoing support for a School Leadership Team. In some cases, the person is called a “coach,” and in other cases the term may be “capacity builder” or “specialist.” In coaching with Indistar®, your learners are primarily the principal and School Leadership Team. Or, if you are coaching a district team, then your learners are the superintendent and District Leadership Team. Of course, the work of the Leadership Team fans out to engage everyone in the district or school community, so the coach is always mindful of the ways the Leadership Team’s lessons learned are internalized by others, how the Leadership Team’s objectives are explained to everyone, and how the Leadership Team supports each person’s mastery and application of effective practice.
Indistar® State Implementation Success Markers
The document outlines success markers for a state's implementation of Indistar, which is a software platform used for school and district improvement planning. It provides a checklist for states to indicate the degree to which they have implemented various leadership structures and support systems related to Indistar. Key aspects include designating a state Indistar leader and administrative team to oversee implementation, providing a state Indistar team to support districts and schools, engaging districts to use Indistar for their own improvement, and providing Indistar coaches to assist identified schools and districts. States can calculate their overall degree of implementation based on the percentage of success markers indicated as "Yes".
Indistar® District Level Indicators
This document discusses indicators for district support of school improvement. It addresses how the district involves community stakeholders in planning, provides incentives for hard-to-staff schools, intervenes early for struggling schools, and allows school autonomy. It also discusses how the district examines existing strategies, ensures improvement plans use research-based programs, and prepares for challenges during the change process. Finally, it outlines how the district clarifies decision-making authority and expectations for communication and professional development between the district and schools.
Indistar® Personalized Learning Indicators
The document discusses personalized learning and outlines effective practices and indicators for digital learning, blended learning, and developing students' cognitive, metacognitive, motivational, and social/emotional competencies. It describes personalized learning as instruction that is paced to individual needs, tailored to learning preferences, and tailored to specific student interests. The document then provides examples of indicators for how schools can effectively implement digital learning, blended learning, and develop various competencies through curriculum, instruction, school culture, and community involvement.
Assessment practices teacher performance
Assessment practices and teacher performance presented at Mid-Hudson Principals' Center Summer Leadership Institute
Indistar® As Innovation
Indistar was born in 2008, in one state for a select group of persistently low-achieving schools, and has since been changing and adapting and fitting to the contexts of 25 states and thousands of schools across the performance spectrum. We believe it is now poised to up the ante, to raise the stakes, to take a leap forward as a pesky little innovation machine. The innovators in this brave new world will be the states, districts, and schools that have been fitting Indistar to their particular contexts.
Student Employment Presentation
The document discusses resources and programs at Texas A&M University for student employment that focus on learning and reflection. It describes employer expectations for graduates and how the university supports connecting student jobs to academics through assessments, supervisor-student interviews, and trainings. Surveys found students reported growth in skills like teamwork, communication, and conflict resolution from pre- to post-employment. The university provides learning contracts, rubrics, reflections, and trainings to help students develop workplace skills and make connections between their jobs and coursework.
Differentiated Professional Development (Artifact)
This document outlines an induction training for new teachers. It includes an agenda for professional development sessions focused on establishing positive parent relations, analyzing student assessment data, and teaching organizational skills. The training will use activities like roleplaying parent communication, analyzing sample student test data, and creating lesson plans for teaching organizational skills. Formative feedback will be collected through parking lot notes, surveys, and exit slips to inform future professional development.
Akhani education whole school development model
The document outlines a framework and model for a whole school development program. It discusses the importance of a conducive learning environment with necessary infrastructure, teaching materials, and structured school operations. It also emphasizes that successful learning requires meeting students' basic needs like nutrition, uniforms, and transportation. The framework has four pillars: help-the-learner programs, school community capacity development, learning and teaching support materials, and school infrastructure projects. It describes the program design, grant-making, and monitoring/evaluation processes for implementing community investment projects.
6 steps to successful teacher appraisal
These 6 steps enhance and streamline your existing teacher appraisal/performance management process.
Teacher evaluation-web-1
This document provides guidelines for Arizona's teacher evaluation process based on the state's framework for measuring educator effectiveness. It outlines three main components of the evaluation: teaching performance, student academic progress data, and survey data. It also describes operational definitions, the evaluation process which includes beginning and end of year conferences to set goals and determine performance classifications, as well as examples of weighting the different components. Appendices provide additional resources like evaluation rubrics and forms.
Assessment
This document discusses assessment in education. It defines assessment as a process used to collect information to improve educational programs and student outcomes. There are three main types of assessment: formative assessment which occurs continuously to guide instruction, summative assessment which evaluates learning at the end of a unit, and authentic assessment which applies knowledge over time with clear criteria. The purposes and roles of assessment are to identify gaps in student learning and inform classroom teaching. Different strategies are used for each assessment type, such as quizzes and questioning for formative and exams or projects for summative. The goal of assessment is to continually improve academic progress.
Teacher induction programs | new teacher center
The document discusses teacher induction programs that are designed to help new teachers transition successfully into their roles and improve their effectiveness. It outlines the key components of successful induction programs, which include instructional mentoring, professional learning communities, engaged principals, and supportive school environments. The New Teacher Center works with districts and states to implement robust induction programs through various services, such as supporting program leaders, providing professional development for mentors, building principal capacity, using assessment tools to guide mentoring, and facilitating continuous program improvement through data analysis. The goal of induction programs is to enhance student achievement, accelerate teacher effectiveness, improve retention, and strengthen leadership.
Via Evaluation Evaluation Plan presentation for GPA
The document discusses evaluation plans and their importance. It provides an overview of what an evaluation plan is and when one is necessary, such as when required by a funder. It outlines the key components of an effective evaluation plan, including identifying the evaluator, developing objectives and indicators, creating a logic model and timeline. The presentation aims to help attendees understand how to create strong evaluation plans that can improve their projects and demonstrate accountability.
Ash Samadi - Blueprint for curriculum instruction
The document provides an overview of the Instructional Blueprint used by Diplomas Now to guide their work. The Blueprint lays out the foundation for teaching and learning, outlining evidence-based practices across assessment, curriculum, and instruction. It also states key tenets that inform all decisions related to these areas. School teams can use the Blueprint to reflect on how their current approaches align with or differ from its guidelines to help strengthen implementation.
Mills philosophy of assessment
This document discusses different types of assessments and their purposes. It outlines how formative assessments, like daily checks for understanding, are more useful for informing instruction compared to annual high-stakes tests. The document advocates for using common assessments in data teams to analyze student work, identify strengths and weaknesses, and determine best practices. It emphasizes that effective data teams regularly examine student data, evaluate instruction, set goals, and use teacher needs to guide improvement efforts.
Revised introduction to ee power point
The document introduces Shrewsbury Public Schools' new educator evaluation system which is being implemented to comply with Massachusetts state regulations and improve teaching and learning. The new five step evaluation cycle will involve goal setting, observations, feedback, and using measures such as student growth percentiles and surveys to provide an impact rating for educators. The district will pilot the new system with 50% of educators in 2013-2014 and fully implement it for all educators the following year.
Evaluation of training
This document discusses training evaluation. It begins by defining training evaluation and identifying its objectives: to define training evaluation, discuss its purpose, and identify different evaluation types. It then discusses that evaluation is a state of mind, not just techniques. The purposes of evaluation are feedback, control, and intervention. Evaluation can assess the training plan, process, and product. Different evaluation methods and tools are reviewed. The document advocates for evaluating all stages of training and discusses frameworks for doing so, including Kirkpatrick's model and evaluating achievement of targets, attracting resources, and satisfying interested parties. It argues that the important question is not why evaluate, but whether an organization can afford not to evaluate training activities.
What's hot (20)
Indistar® Instructional team Self-Assessment Rubric
Indistar® Instructional team Self-Assessment Rubric
Differentiated Professional Development (Artifact)
Differentiated Professional Development (Artifact)
Via Evaluation Evaluation Plan presentation for GPA
Via Evaluation Evaluation Plan presentation for GPA
Similar to Indistar® Quality of Work Checklist and Assessment
Make your assessments more effective with test analytics
Talent assessment platform: http://bit.ly/2SYhZYS
Accurate screening of candidates is possible only
with a high-quality assessment. Building quality in
assessments takes time and requires a consistent
measure of the process against standards that
define its quality
first-batch-me-training.pptx
This document outlines the objectives and structure of a training on Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) skills and expertise for researchers. The training aims to build M&E capacity among researchers to strengthen development evaluation. It will cover M&E framework and tool development, as well as program and project evaluation. The training is expected to equip researchers with M&E skills and expertise to become M&E specialists or professional research consultants.
Performance appraisal
This document discusses performance appraisals, which are used to evaluate employees' performance and potential. It outlines the steps in conducting performance appraisals, including establishing standards, designing an appraisal program, appraising performance, conducting performance interviews, and using appraisal data appropriately. The objectives and benefits of performance appraisals are also summarized, such as helping employees improve, determining training needs, and identifying high and low performers. Finally, common methods for conducting appraisals are described at both the individual and group level.
Performance appraisal presentation
Performance appraisals are used to evaluate employee performance and link to other HR functions. There are various methods of appraisal like critical incident reports, rating scales, and management by objectives. Appraisals are used to identify training needs, determine compensation, make promotion and dismissal decisions, and ensure recruitment and selection processes are effective. They enhance communication between managers and employees and support employee development.
Evaluation of training
The document discusses Kirkpatrick's model for evaluating training programs using a four-tier approach. Tier 1 evaluates reactions, Tier 2 evaluates learning, Tier 3 evaluates behavior change, and Tier 4 evaluates results including business impact. Formative and summative evaluation are also discussed. Feedback forms, surveys, tests and business metrics are used to measure outcomes at each tier. The goal is to improve training quality and impact over time based on evaluation results.
Methods of performance appraisal
This document discusses performance appraisal methods used to evaluate employee performance. It describes traditional methods like confidential reports, essays, rankings, checklists and critical incidents. It also outlines modern methods like assessment centers, human resource accounting, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and management by objectives. The goal of performance appraisals is to provide regular feedback to employees, identify strengths and weaknesses, and make compensation, promotion and development decisions in a fair manner. A variety of quantitative and qualitative techniques are used to holistically assess an employee's overall job performance.
Training2
The document summarizes conducting a level 4 evaluation of training provided to production workers at a manufacturing mill. Key aspects included:
- Surveying workers and managers to identify training needs and goals around quality improvement.
- Evaluating the training at levels 1-4, including analyzing metrics on operator errors pre and post training.
- The results revealed improvements in quality metrics and identified success factors like management support and effective trainers.
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation: Selecting Evaluation Tools
Overview and Rationale
For this assignment, you will be selecting evaluation tools and adding those selected to the
Evaluation Goal Matrix that you developed as part of the previous assignment.
Program and Course Outcomes
This assignment is directly linked to the following key learning outcomes from the course
syllabus:
LO3: Analyze and apply appropriate evaluation tool
L07: Plan and conduct a tactical evaluation using both qualitative and quantitative
measures
In addition to these key learning outcomes, you will also have the opportunity to evidence
the following skills through completing this assignment:
Critical thinking
Problem solving
Essential Components & Instructions
Using the project you identified in Lesson 1 and the stakeholder analysis and performance
metrics you identified as part of Lesson 2, you will be selecting evaluation tools and adding
them to your Evaluation Goal Matrix from Lesson 2.
Begin by updating your Evaluation Goal Matrix with any feedback provided, and then add
an additional column titled 'Evaluation Tool' and select an evaluation tool for each of the
metrics you identified during Lesson 2. Therefore, you will identify a minimum of one
evaluation tool for each of the entries in your evaluation goal matrix.
Once you identify the tools that you will use, write a few paragraphs on how each tool will
be used, why the tool was selected, who will be responsible for performing the evaluation
with the tool and how the data will be used and will help support the success of the project.
These entries can be made below your updated evaluation goal matrix. You should provide
a thorough evaluation and explanation of each tool you list in your updated evaluation goal
matrix. You may wish to use materials from the lesson, readings, and external sources in
writing the explanations. However, be sure to cite any sources that you use in writing the
explanations.
Format
Below are some key guidelines you will want to ensure you follow. Think of this short list
as a quality control checklist, along with the attached grading rubric.
Be sure you have identified at least one tool per goal in your matrix
You may use a tool to assess multiple goals if it is appropriate; if you do this, make sure
in your explanation that you provide sufficient detail to address all the goals the tool
addresses
You should submit an updated Evaluation Goal Matrix and the narrative descriptive and
explanation of each tool in a single file (MsWord or .pdf)
You should include a cover page
You should provide a brief abstract about the process you went through to develop your
two tables.
You should provide a project summary of your project
You should format the documents professionally
The tables should be readable without having to zoom in on small text
Rubric(s)
Asse.
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation: Selecting Evaluation Tools
Overview and Rationale
For this assignment, you will be selecting evaluation tools and adding those selected to the
Evaluation Goal Matrix that you developed as part of the previous assignment.
Program and Course Outcomes
This assignment is directly linked to the following key learning outcomes from the course
syllabus:
LO3: Analyze and apply appropriate evaluation tool
L07: Plan and conduct a tactical evaluation using both qualitative and quantitative
measures
In addition to these key learning outcomes, you will also have the opportunity to evidence
the following skills through completing this assignment:
Critical thinking
Problem solving
Essential Components & Instructions
Using the project you identified in Lesson 1 and the stakeholder analysis and performance
metrics you identified as part of Lesson 2, you will be selecting evaluation tools and adding
them to your Evaluation Goal Matrix from Lesson 2.
Begin by updating your Evaluation Goal Matrix with any feedback provided, and then add
an additional column titled 'Evaluation Tool' and select an evaluation tool for each of the
metrics you identified during Lesson 2. Therefore, you will identify a minimum of one
evaluation tool for each of the entries in your evaluation goal matrix.
Once you identify the tools that you will use, write a few paragraphs on how each tool will
be used, why the tool was selected, who will be responsible for performing the evaluation
with the tool and how the data will be used and will help support the success of the project.
These entries can be made below your updated evaluation goal matrix. You should provide
a thorough evaluation and explanation of each tool you list in your updated evaluation goal
matrix. You may wish to use materials from the lesson, readings, and external sources in
writing the explanations. However, be sure to cite any sources that you use in writing the
explanations.
Format
Below are some key guidelines you will want to ensure you follow. Think of this short list
as a quality control checklist, along with the attached grading rubric.
Be sure you have identified at least one tool per goal in your matrix
You may use a tool to assess multiple goals if it is appropriate; if you do this, make sure
in your explanation that you provide sufficient detail to address all the goals the tool
addresses
You should submit an updated Evaluation Goal Matrix and the narrative descriptive and
explanation of each tool in a single file (MsWord or .pdf)
You should include a cover page
You should provide a brief abstract about the process you went through to develop your
two tables.
You should provide a project summary of your project
You should format the documents professionally
The tables should be readable without having to zoom in on small text
Rubric(s)
Asse ...
Practical Evaluation Workshop
This document summarizes a workshop on evaluating mentoring programs. The goal is to promote skills and confidence in program evaluation. Participants will learn how evaluation relates to quality, potential benefits, evaluation steps and resources. Evaluation is important to improve programs, ensure accountability, use resources effectively and avoid harm. Types of evaluation include process, which examines implementation, and outcome, which examines effects. Challenges to evaluation include time, capacity, and buy-in, but strategies can overcome barriers. A seven-step process is outlined to design an evaluation plan and integrate it into ongoing practices.
Admin_TrngEfficacy_Report_FINAL_01-04-16
The Office of Communication and Professional Development (CPD) piloted a methodology to evaluate training efficacy (Level 3 evaluations) by surveying employees and supervisors about behavior changes after a training course. The pilot evaluated the "Safeguarding Confidential Information" course from 2014. Over 50% of employees and supervisors responded, indicating the training positively changed behavior. Based on the successful pilot, CPD recommends conducting Level 3 evaluations for other agency-wide courses to improve training and identify behavior changes. The evaluations would survey employees and supervisors about changes about 3 months after training completion.
Beyond surveys
There's more to learning evaluation than surveys and smile sheets. In this recent webinar, Andrew Downes laid down practical, straightforward advice on how to take your learning evaluation further and measure whether your learning programs are having the impact they were designed to achieve.
Here's the slides!
L301101
The document provides information about an audit and assurance unit. It outlines that students should download the unit outline and week 1 document from Blackboard. It details the assessment breakdown including tutorial questions worth 20% and an assignment worth 20%. The document provides grading criteria for tutorials and assignments. It also includes detailed CRA sheets that students are to complete individually to provide peer feedback on groupwork assessments.
Formatted_EvaluationPlanTemplate
The document proposes revisions and expansions to the evaluation plan for the Relationship Remix workshops program at the University of Michigan. It suggests revamping the program objectives, creating a logic model, broadening the process evaluation, and broadening the impact evaluation. For the process evaluation, it recommends evaluating additional components such as context, recruitment, fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, and reach using both quantitative and qualitative methods like surveys, attendance tracking, and focus groups. For the impact evaluation, it proposes a new design and revising the evaluation tools to align with the revised objectives. The goal is to conduct a more comprehensive evaluation to better understand the program's effectiveness and areas for improvement.
Management Performance Appraisal
Performance appraisal is the systematic evaluation of employee performance and abilities in order to understand their strengths and weaknesses for growth, development, and compensation decisions. It involves supervisors measuring employee performance against targets and plans, analyzing performance factors, and providing guidance for improvement. The objectives of performance appraisals include promotions, confirmations, training, compensation reviews, competency building, improving communication, and evaluating HR programs. Common appraisal methods include rating scales, checklists, forced choice, critical incidents, behavioral anchors, field reviews, tests and observations, records, essays, and cost accounting. Future-oriented methods include management by objectives, psychological assessments, assessment centers, and 360-degree feedback. Advantages are promotion decisions, determining compensation,
Ppt on pa
The document discusses performance appraisal, which is the systematic evaluation of an employee's job performance by a supervisor. Performance appraisals are used to understand employees' abilities and contributions, identify training needs, and make personnel decisions. They involve rating employees on criteria like quality, quantity, and timeliness of work. Effective performance appraisals include setting objectives, defining standards, designing the evaluation process, implementing evaluations, providing feedback, and taking follow-up actions to improve performance.
M22MS051_Designing performance evaluation schema.pptx
Designing performance evaluation schema
1) Elementary school teacher
2) Software Developer
3) Research Scientist
4) Customer Support Executive
parameters
1) Definition of performance
2) Metrics / Criteria to evaluate Job role
3) Measures used to evaluate performance basis the matrix
4) Scoring to ranking on the extent of performance
methodsofperformanceappraisal-170222015553.pptx
The document discusses various traditional and modern methods of performance appraisal. Traditional methods include ranking, paired comparison, grading, forced distribution, forced-choice, check-list, critical incidents, graphic rating scale, and essay methods. Modern methods discussed are management by objectives, behaviorally anchored rating scales, assessment centers, 360-degree appraisal, and human resource accounting. The methods are used to systematically evaluate employee performance against objectives and identify areas for development.
methodsofperformanceappraisal-170222015553.pdf
This document discusses various methods of performance appraisal. It outlines traditional methods such as ranking, paired comparison, grading, forced distribution, forced-choice, check-list, critical incidents, graphic rating scale, and essay methods. It also describes modern methods including management by objectives, behaviorally anchored rating scales, assessment centers, 360-degree appraisal, and human resource accounting. The document provides details on how each method works and its advantages or disadvantages.
Methods of performance appraisal
Detailed explanation about methods of the performance appraisal, and the definition of performance appraisal with detailed information.
Similar to Indistar® Quality of Work Checklist and Assessment (20)
Make your assessments more effective with test analytics
Make your assessments more effective with test analytics
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
PJM6125 Project Evaluation Selecting Evaluation Tools .docx
M22MS051_Designing performance evaluation schema.pptx
M22MS051_Designing performance evaluation schema.pptx
More from Academic Development Institute
District Indicators-Suggested
The document describes Indistar, a platform that guides school district leadership teams in improving professional practices. It focuses on districts supporting school success through seven effective practices with indicators. Leadership teams assess performance against the indicators and work towards full implementation. The document outlines district success markers and progress pacing, which provide guideposts for implementation fidelity. It lists the seven effective practices and their indicators that leadership teams work to implement.
Personalized Learning
This summary provides an overview of a conversation between a teacher and her friend about personalized learning:
1. The teacher feels frustrated that she cannot keep up with the changing demands of her profession and personalize learning for her diverse students. She questions how to effectively use technology, organize flexible learning pathways, and meet all of her students' individual needs.
2. Her friend reassures her that she already personalizes learning through her strong relationships with students and deep understanding of their interests, needs, and pacing. While technology can help, the teacher's role remains central.
3. The handbook emphasizes that personalized learning is built upon caring teacher-student relationships, student engagement, and developing students' cognitive, metac
Indistar® Family Engagement Indicators
The document outlines indicators for family engagement at schools. It discusses how school leadership teams and parent-teacher organizations involve parents in decision making. It also describes goals and roles like compacts outlining teacher, parent, and student responsibilities, homework guidelines, and ways to recognize accomplishments. Additionally, it lists ways schools communicate with families through key documents, teacher-family contacts, and school-family updates. The document provides indicators for how schools can educate parents through parent-child activities, a family resource library, training volunteers, and parent workshops. It also describes ways schools can connect with families through open houses, parent-teacher conferences, family-school nights, home visits, and spaces for parents to meet.
Indistar® Culture and Language Indicators
The document outlines 14 indicators for how a school can integrate and promote Native American culture, history, language, and values. Key aspects include providing staff training on local tribal culture and history, having tribal mentors, reflecting tribal culture in the school's appearance, integrating Native culture into lessons and curriculum, including tribal elders in school events, teaching tribal language basics to all students, and promoting Native culture with respect for other groups.
Indistar® Training Modules: Getting Better At What We Do
Whatever our role, the best thing we can do for students is to keep getting better at what we do. Here is how we improve.
Indistar® Success Story: Scott Dual Language Margret School
If Scott Dual Language Magnet Elementary School in Topeka, Kansas, were to write a six-word memoir, it might sound like this: Blacklist to waitlist in two years; or, Built from strengths, success soon followed.
Indistar® State Implementation
This document outlines success markers for states to measure their implementation of Indistar, a web-based platform for school improvement. It includes markers in the areas of leadership and decision making, and support for districts and schools. A state's degree of implementation is calculated by the percentage of success markers marked "yes." The document also lists district success markers focused on the district leadership team's regular meetings to review data and indicators and support school improvement.
Indistar® for State Level Progress Query Report
This document provides instructions for generating a Progress Query Report to identify schools or districts that meet certain criteria. The user selects the variable to include in the report, enters criteria to define the variable, then generates the report which can then be exported or printed.
Indistar® for State Level Drill Down Report
The drilldown report allows users to view assessment, plan, and achievement data at the school or district level for indicator implementation. Users can choose either the school or district report, then select between all districts or a specific one. Clicking on a school or district name in the report takes the user to the QuickScore report which provides additional details about leadership, meetings, indicator implementation, and coaching comments.
Indistar® for State Level Aggregate Report
These reports provide aggregate data on all school and district teams' progress in assessing, planning for, and achieving indicators. The reports show the number of districts or schools that have been in the system for different lengths of time and include a color-coded bar graph of the number of indicators assessed, planned, and achieved. The state education agency can use this information to determine if districts and schools are on track, if progress is being made over time, and what next steps or celebrations may be needed.
Indistar® for State Level Submission Report
Submitted Reports allows users to view all reports submitted by districts and individual schools for the current or previous school years. Users can filter the reports by school year, district, school group, and see if reports were submitted on time. Reports are listed alphabetically and can be sorted by submission to identify schools that did or did not turn reports in. The tool provides transparency into report submission across districts and schools.
Indistar® for State Level Data Mining
This document discusses data mining. It mentions data mining three times but provides no other details about the topic. The document contains numbers but no context for what they refer to. Overall, the document gives a very limited amount of information and its key points cannot be determined from the content provided.
Indistar® for State Level Displaying Progress
The Display Progress report in INDIstar allows users to view the progress schools and districts have made in entering information. It shows the latest dates that key components were entered and allows sorting based on those dates. It also allows viewing any files schools have uploaded by clicking the file icon. The report provides a quick way to check completion of process components for schools, compare progress across districts, and see supporting files from individual schools.
Indistar® for State Level Login Activity
This document explains how state administrators can use the login activity feature to monitor which stakeholders are logging into their school and district Indistar pages. Administrators can view all login activity or filter by district, school, access level, and timeframe. This allows administrators to check which stakeholders, coaches, schools, and districts are regularly logging in and accessing the pages.
Indistar® for State Level Overview
This document provides an overview of the tools and features available to state administrators in the Indistar system. It describes how state administrators can view submitted reports and feedback from schools and districts. It also explains how administrators can monitor school and district activity and progress, view login activity, run informational reports, drill down to view school and district data, and send bulletins to recipients.
More from Academic Development Institute (15)
Indistar® Training Modules: Getting Better At What We Do
Indistar® Training Modules: Getting Better At What We Do
Indistar® Success Story: Scott Dual Language Margret School
Indistar® Success Story: Scott Dual Language Margret School
Recently uploaded
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcDRUGS AND ITS classification slide share
Any substance (other than food) that is used to prevent, diagnose, treat, or relieve symptoms of a
disease or abnormal condition
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdAzure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.Recently uploaded (20)
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
Indistar® Quality of Work Checklist and Assessment
- 1. Page 1 of 1 Quality of Work Checklist Assessing Indicators and Providing Evidence From a sample of 10 indicators that have been assessed. 1. Number of indicators analyzed: 2. Of indicators analyzed, number of indicators determined by team to be fully implemented in Assessment step: 3. Of indicators analyzed, number of objectives determined by team to be fully implemented in Monitoring step: 4. Candor in Assessing Indicators ___ All sampled indicators show assessment is consistent with coach’s understanding of the school ___ Most (60% or more) sampled indicators show assessment is consistent with coach’s understanding of the school ___ Some (20% to 59%) sampled indicators show assessment is consistent with coach’s understanding of the school ___ Few (at least one but less than 20%) ___ No sampled indicators show assessment is consistent with coach’s understanding of the school 5. Adequacy of Evidence Provided for Full Implementation ___ All sampled, fully-implemented indicators/objectives show evidence that plainly and convincingly shows that the team has information necessary to declare the indicator/objective is fully implemented ___ Most (60% or more) sampled, fully-implemented indicators/objectives show evidence that plainly and convincingly shows that the team has information necessary to declare the indicator/objective is fully implemented ___ Some (20% to 59%) sampled, fully-implemented indicators/objectives show evidence that plainly and convincingly shows that the team has information necessary to declare the indicator/objective is fully implemented ___ Few (at least one but less than 20%) sampled, fully-implemented indicators/objectives show evidence that plainly and convincingly shows that the team has information necessary to declare the indicator/objective is fully implemented ___ No sampled, fully-implemented indicators/objectives show evidence that plainly and convincingly shows that the team has information necessary to declare the indicator/objective is fully implemented