1) The document outlines key components to include in an impact framework for assessing ICT-enabled social innovation initiatives, including ICT, personal social services, social innovation, social investment, and impact assessment.
2) It discusses recognized measurement methodologies involving setting goals, developing a framework, selecting metrics, and undertaking analysis. Theories of change are commonly used.
3) Stakeholders in impact measurement are identified as impact creators, funders, beneficiaries and recipients, each with different perspectives.
4) Existing good practice frameworks address measuring social impact generally as well as specific areas like ICT and social innovation. Guidelines emphasize qualitative and quantitative approaches.
An 8-step guide to help not-for-profit organizations develop a Project Impact Pathway or Logic Model for their programs - The first presentation in our Project Evaluation Series. By DevMetrica
An overview of impact evaluation for organizations based on a program's Theory of Change, highlighting the need for a counterfactual and randomization (when possible) in order to convincingly demonstrate the effect of the program.
Balancing Acceleration and Systemic Impact: Finding leverage for transformation in SDG change strategies
https://rsdsymposium.org/balancing-acceleration-and-systemic-impact-finding-leverage-for-transformation-in-sdg-change-strategies/
An 8-step guide to help not-for-profit organizations develop a Project Impact Pathway or Logic Model for their programs - The first presentation in our Project Evaluation Series. By DevMetrica
An overview of impact evaluation for organizations based on a program's Theory of Change, highlighting the need for a counterfactual and randomization (when possible) in order to convincingly demonstrate the effect of the program.
Balancing Acceleration and Systemic Impact: Finding leverage for transformation in SDG change strategies
https://rsdsymposium.org/balancing-acceleration-and-systemic-impact-finding-leverage-for-transformation-in-sdg-change-strategies/
The implementation 'black box' and evaluation as a driver for change. Presentation by Katie Burke and Claire Hickey of the Centre for Effective Services.
Measuring the impact of integrated systems research
Panel Speakers: Vincent Gitz, Natalia Estrada Estrada Carmona, Monica Biradavolu and Karl Hughes. Measuring the Impact of Integrated Systems Research (September 27, 2021 – September 30, 2021). Three-day virtual workshop co hosted by the CGIAR Research Programs on Water Land and Ecosystems (WLE); Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA); Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM); and SPIA, the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the CGIAR. The workshop took stock of existing and new methodological developments of monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment work, and discussed which are suitable to evaluate and assess complex, integrated systems research.
Reviewing the evidence on implementation and long-term impact of integrated landscape approaches - James Reed, CIFOR. Measuring the Impact of Integrated Systems Research (September 27, 2021 – September 30, 2021). Three-day virtual workshop co hosted by the CGIAR Research Programs on Water Land and Ecosystems (WLE); Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA); Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM); and SPIA, the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the CGIAR. The workshop took stock of existing and new methodological developments of monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment work, and discussed which are suitable to evaluate and assess complex, integrated systems research.
Searching for outcomes in rural Tanzania: Harvesting directly from those infl...John Mauremootoo
The benefits and challenges of using Outcome Harvesting to evaluate a short-term intervention are explored using the example of an 18 month social change project supported by the UK Department for International Development in Tanzania. The project was that was highly ambitious: it sought to influence changes in gender attitudes and behaviour of the general public in Tanzania. Challenges included the lack of outcome indications in project document and the lack of knowledge of outcomes among project personnel. Outcome Harvesting was adapted to allow the harvesting of outcomes using focus groups of those the project sought to influence directly. The concept of ‘proto-outcome’ was used for suggestions of attitude changes that may lead ultimately to behaviour changes. Substantiation of outcomes involved not only third parties but direct observation. The resulting descriptions of outcomes and the evaluation findings proved valuable for learning in the organisation, Search for Common Ground.
Getting research into action: issues, challenges, solutions by Dr Sarah MortonHazel Hall
Sarah Morton has worked across research, policy and practice for most of her career, and will draw on examples from different settings encountered over this time in her presentation. She is keen to interrogate our learning about effective evidence use from the last 20 years, and review how this can be supported from research and practice perspectives. She will present a vision for the effective use of evidence of all kinds to plan, develop and improve policy, practice, and services. As part of this she will explain some of the ways that she is currently developing tools and support for effective evidence use.
Thinking of selling your home? You MUST set yourself apart from everyone else else. Your home must have an edge if you want top dollar with maximum exposure and the best lead generation software available. Don't just settle for a sign in the yard and a multiple listing service. Choose an professional who understands the tech-savvy buyers of today's market. Re/Max 8 is the ONLY real estate company that can offer Listing Booster.
Call me for a custom market analysis of your home and I'll show you a marketing strategy that will maximize your exposure bringing you top totter in record time.
The implementation 'black box' and evaluation as a driver for change. Presentation by Katie Burke and Claire Hickey of the Centre for Effective Services.
Measuring the impact of integrated systems research
Panel Speakers: Vincent Gitz, Natalia Estrada Estrada Carmona, Monica Biradavolu and Karl Hughes. Measuring the Impact of Integrated Systems Research (September 27, 2021 – September 30, 2021). Three-day virtual workshop co hosted by the CGIAR Research Programs on Water Land and Ecosystems (WLE); Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA); Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM); and SPIA, the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the CGIAR. The workshop took stock of existing and new methodological developments of monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment work, and discussed which are suitable to evaluate and assess complex, integrated systems research.
Reviewing the evidence on implementation and long-term impact of integrated landscape approaches - James Reed, CIFOR. Measuring the Impact of Integrated Systems Research (September 27, 2021 – September 30, 2021). Three-day virtual workshop co hosted by the CGIAR Research Programs on Water Land and Ecosystems (WLE); Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA); Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM); and SPIA, the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the CGIAR. The workshop took stock of existing and new methodological developments of monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment work, and discussed which are suitable to evaluate and assess complex, integrated systems research.
Searching for outcomes in rural Tanzania: Harvesting directly from those infl...John Mauremootoo
The benefits and challenges of using Outcome Harvesting to evaluate a short-term intervention are explored using the example of an 18 month social change project supported by the UK Department for International Development in Tanzania. The project was that was highly ambitious: it sought to influence changes in gender attitudes and behaviour of the general public in Tanzania. Challenges included the lack of outcome indications in project document and the lack of knowledge of outcomes among project personnel. Outcome Harvesting was adapted to allow the harvesting of outcomes using focus groups of those the project sought to influence directly. The concept of ‘proto-outcome’ was used for suggestions of attitude changes that may lead ultimately to behaviour changes. Substantiation of outcomes involved not only third parties but direct observation. The resulting descriptions of outcomes and the evaluation findings proved valuable for learning in the organisation, Search for Common Ground.
Getting research into action: issues, challenges, solutions by Dr Sarah MortonHazel Hall
Sarah Morton has worked across research, policy and practice for most of her career, and will draw on examples from different settings encountered over this time in her presentation. She is keen to interrogate our learning about effective evidence use from the last 20 years, and review how this can be supported from research and practice perspectives. She will present a vision for the effective use of evidence of all kinds to plan, develop and improve policy, practice, and services. As part of this she will explain some of the ways that she is currently developing tools and support for effective evidence use.
Thinking of selling your home? You MUST set yourself apart from everyone else else. Your home must have an edge if you want top dollar with maximum exposure and the best lead generation software available. Don't just settle for a sign in the yard and a multiple listing service. Choose an professional who understands the tech-savvy buyers of today's market. Re/Max 8 is the ONLY real estate company that can offer Listing Booster.
Call me for a custom market analysis of your home and I'll show you a marketing strategy that will maximize your exposure bringing you top totter in record time.
IDR Medical's Case Study. The client company is a global leader in its field of laboratory diagnostics, their range of devices is immensely successful, but there is a need to evolve and stay at the forefront of the market.
IDR Medical is an international marketing consultancy company with local offices in the UK, the US and Switzerland.
This presentation follows on our previous work from measuring the impact and return on investment of social, community, enterprise development programs. This presentation provides evidence of our work, our methodology and the impact that we measure of development practices. Our impact assessment methodology was developed for Africa, by Africa and is aimed at practitioners from both the investment and development fraternity.
Evaluation of SME and entreprenuership programme - Jonathan Potter & Stuart T...OECD CFE
Presentation by Jonathan Potter, OECD LEED Senior Policy Analyst, and Stuart Thompson, OECD LEED Policy Analys, tat the seminar organised by the OECD LEED Trento Centre for the Officers of the Autonomous Province of Trento on 13 November 2015.
https://www.trento.oecd.org
Jim Bennett (consultant for GIZ) made this presentation during the parallel session hosted by the German International
Cooperation (Deutsche gesellschaft für internationale zusammenarbeit) , "Evaluating EITI Impact in Africa"
Looking at implementation: how useful is realist evaluation?valéry ridde
Presentation by Emilie Robert (McGill University).
Global Health Workshop: Methods For Implementation Science in Global Health.
http://www.equitesante.org/implementation-science-methods-in-global-health/
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Up the Ratios Bylaws - a Comprehensive Process of Our Organizationuptheratios
Up the Ratios is a non-profit organization dedicated to bridging the gap in STEM education for underprivileged students by providing free, high-quality learning opportunities in robotics and other STEM fields. Our mission is to empower the next generation of innovators, thinkers, and problem-solvers by offering a range of educational programs that foster curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking.
At Up the Ratios, we believe that every student, regardless of their socio-economic background, should have access to the tools and knowledge needed to succeed in today's technology-driven world. To achieve this, we host a variety of free classes, workshops, summer camps, and live lectures tailored to students from underserved communities. Our programs are designed to be engaging and hands-on, allowing students to explore the exciting world of robotics and STEM through practical, real-world applications.
Our free classes cover fundamental concepts in robotics, coding, and engineering, providing students with a strong foundation in these critical areas. Through our interactive workshops, students can dive deeper into specific topics, working on projects that challenge them to apply what they've learned and think creatively. Our summer camps offer an immersive experience where students can collaborate on larger projects, develop their teamwork skills, and gain confidence in their abilities.
In addition to our local programs, Up the Ratios is committed to making a global impact. We take donations of new and gently used robotics parts, which we then distribute to students and educational institutions in other countries. These donations help ensure that young learners worldwide have the resources they need to explore and excel in STEM fields. By supporting education in this way, we aim to nurture a global community of future leaders and innovators.
Our live lectures feature guest speakers from various STEM disciplines, including engineers, scientists, and industry professionals who share their knowledge and experiences with our students. These lectures provide valuable insights into potential career paths and inspire students to pursue their passions in STEM.
Up the Ratios relies on the generosity of donors and volunteers to continue our work. Contributions of time, expertise, and financial support are crucial to sustaining our programs and expanding our reach. Whether you're an individual passionate about education, a professional in the STEM field, or a company looking to give back to the community, there are many ways to get involved and make a difference.
We are proud of the positive impact we've had on the lives of countless students, many of whom have gone on to pursue higher education and careers in STEM. By providing these young minds with the tools and opportunities they need to succeed, we are not only changing their futures but also contributing to the advancement of technology and innovation on a broader scale.
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
1. iFRAME
Neil Reeder, Clara Péron and Karl H Richter
- impact Framework for Real And Meaningful Evaluation -
Deriving a framework to assess the impacts generated by
ICT-enabled social innovation initiatives
promoting social investment for integrated approaches to the
provision of personal social services
Brussels - 25th February 2015
2. Structure of presentation
Key components to be included in framework
Recognized measurement ‘meta-methodologies’
Roles in impact measurement and implications
Choices of measurement methodologies
Existing good practice frameworks for key components
2
1
2
3
4
5
K
3. K
Scene setting
3
From interesting objects in the landscape … to an impactful image
5 August 1962 - 29°28'06.1"S 30°10'15.7"E
Time and place of Nelson Mandela’s capture by police
Be alert to different perspectives and levels
4. Components to elaborate a framework
ICT
(Enabler)
PSSGIs
(Personal Social
Services of General
Interest)
Social
innovation
(New approaches)
Social
investment
(Context &
drivers)
PSSGIs:
1. Education and training
2. Employability and employment
3. Social assistance
4. Social care and childcare
5. Social inclusion
4
1 Key components to be included in framework
Impact
assessment
(Non-financial
effects)
3 x levels of impact
4 x perspectives of impact
(Could also mean private capital via debt or
equity financial product; 3rd sector grant by
NGO, charity or foundation; social capital via
volunteering & the sharing economy)
Social investment:
• Public sector spend on
infrastructure or social programmes
• Context: Social Investment Package
K
5. There is a wide recognition of the key stages
involved in impact assessment
First three stages of impact assessment are:
5
2 Recognized measurement ‘meta-methodologies’
Set goals
Articulate the
desired impact
Develop
framework
Select metrics
Collect and
store data
Undertake processes
(EU GECES sub-group, G8 Social Impact Investment Taskforce, EVPA, SROI Network, others)
K
Analysis
Theory of Change augmented
by pattern recognition
No Rating systems
Is a statistical
approach used?
Yes SROINo
Stakeholder
views on
attribution
Cost Benefit Analysis
Multi-Criteria
Decision Analysis
Randomised
evaluations
Before and
after study
Propensity
scoring
Yes
Approaches Techniques/
Methodologies
Is an effort made
to assess change
post-intervention?
6. 6
The logic map or theory of change guides most
impact measurement frameworks
• Emerging consensus advocates a logic map basis
(also known as theory of change/ theory of value creation)
Resources that are
deployed
Actions performed in
support of objectives
Tangible products and
services
Changes, or effects on
individuals
Changes, or effects on
society
• Past emphasis has been on inputs, activities and outputs
• Best practice focuses on outcomes and impact (or value added)
2 Recognized measurement ‘meta-methodologies’ N
• This approach is advocated numerous bodies
e.g. the GIIN, The SROI Network, G8 & GECES
7. Impact creator
• Sector
(e.g. Health, Retailing, Utility)
• Organizational type
(public sector, public company,
social enterprise, co-operative,
charity)
Funder
• Government commissioner
• Social investor
• Venture philanthropist
• Private investor
7
Funder
Impact
Creator
Impact
Beneficiary
Recipients
3 Roles in impact measurement and implications
There are key roles within the social investment
value chain (1/4)
Impact beneficiary & recipients
(of goods & services)
• Client (direct effects) /
People with priority needs
• Intermediary
• Staff
• Environment
• Local community
• Government agency (especially
welfare or criminal justice)
• Market rate charge
• Subsidised charge
• Free at point of use
Source: drawn from LSE working paper (2013) Reeder and Colantonio
N
8. There are key roles within the social investment
value chain (2/4) – Micro level
Funder
(e.g. public sector commissioner,
foundation or investor)
provides resources to impact
creator & interprets the impact
for beneficiaries
Impact creator
(business, social enterprise,
public sector)
creates impact from
available resources
Impact beneficiaries
(client, workforce, community, etc.)
gain better outcomes
Impact
generation
2. Interpretation of impact
• apportioned pro-rata based
on proportion of funding
• implicit in logic map
• explicit in SROI
Recipients
(can be client of impact creators or other
relationship, can be beneficiary but not always)
receive goods or services
from impact creator
Revenue / resources
(goods & services)
Source: drawn from LSE working paper (2013) Reeder and Colantonio
8
Funding
- grant or subsidy
- repayable capital
- conditional payment
3 Roles in impact measurement and implications
1. Interpretation of impact on impact creator
(e.g. improved organisational capacity, cashflow etc)
3. Financial return
(If applicable)
N
9. There are key roles within the social investment
value chain (3/4) – Meso & Macro Levels
Wider group of
funders
provide resources to impact
creators & interpret the impact
for beneficiaries
Wider group of
impact creators
create impact from
available resources
Impact beneficiaries
gain better outcomes
Impact
generation2. Interpretation of impact
Wider group of recipients
receive goods or services
from impact creators
Revenue / resources
(goods & services)
Source: drawn from LSE working paper (2013) Reeder and Colantonio
9
Funding
3 Roles in impact measurement and implications
1. Interpretation of impact
3. Financial return
N
10. 10
3 Roles in impact measurement and implications
There are key roles within the social investment
value chain (4/4)
• Working data model - showing relationship between datasets
EngagedX Investment STandards (EXIST)
Source: from ‘Social Impact Investment: Building the Evidence Base’ published by the OECD Feb 2015 for the G8)
N
11. Choice of measurement technique/ methodology:
influences, considerations and perspectives
11
4 Perspectives on choices of measurement methodologies
Analysis
Theory of Change augmented
by pattern recognition
No Rating systems
Is a statistical
approach used?
Yes SROINo
Stakeholder
views on
attribution
Cost Benefit Analysis
Multi-Criteria
Decision Analysis
Randomised
evaluations
Before and
after study
Propensity
scoring
Yes
Approaches
Techniques/
Methodologies
• Techniques / methodologies vary
according to mind-sets of evaluators:
• Technocratic < > participative
• Integrative < > disparate
• No ‘one-size fits all’
Is an effort made
to assess change
post-intervention?
N
12. Key Principles of measurement put forth by GECES
• Avoid scope for “gaming” or perverse incentives:
with any measurement there are those that will try to play the system to enable
targets to be shown to be achieved
• Outputs should not be treated as outcomes or impacts:
outputs are not the objective in themselves, but a means to achieving that
• Inflexibility is problematic:
Any measurement system must embrace the need to change and improve
• Blend quantification with qualitative understanding:
The story of the changing of lives, attitudes and outlooks must always come first
• Important to maintain proportionality:
the effort and degree of accuracy achieved needs to be proportional to the usage
of that measurement
Source: GECES (2014)
4 Perspectives on choices of measurement methodologies
12
N
13. Good practice frameworks - Social impact generally (1/3)
• Key aspects:
• What – the activity being undertaken
• Whom – multiple stakeholders/ beneficiaries
• Why – the outcome area / social concern being targeted
• Which effect – contrasting with a counterfactual
• Key dimensions of value
• Segmentation by sector of value creation
• Impact varies over time and with location
• Across micro/ meso/ macro levels
• Incorporating direct and indirect effects
• Influenced by confidence in the evidence
13
5 Existing good practice frameworks for key components N
14. Good practice frameworks - ICT (2/3)
ICT – 7 principle roles
• Computation
• Communication
• Co-ordination
• Recollection
• Automation
• Evaluation
• Design
Source: Denning (2012)
14
Source: Carretero et al (2012)
Communication
- Online and telephone-based information and advice
- Link virtually with others for emotional or practical support
- Access to content and services in mother tongue
- Enable online communities and informal exchanges
Co-ordination
- Sustain coordination & cooperation with those involved in care
- Facilitate participation of multiple actors in caring such as volunteers
Recollection
- Self-training to acquire skills in managing long-term diseases
Automation
- Help carers to make care arrangement online
for example …
Metrics might include:
• Do you feel well informed?
• How often do you speak to family and friends?
• How easy is it to obtain support?
5 Existing good practice frameworks for key components N
15. Good practice frameworks - Social innovation (3/3)
Diffusion, transferability or scalability is a fundamental aim of
social innovation, but raises many issues:
• It’s effects can be direct or indirect
• Measurement needs to take a flexible and qualitative approach
• The measurement approach needs to reveal complex causal relationships
i.e it is a nonlinear process
• One note of caution – it is not easy to capture data on social innovation
because it cascades, it moves back, it cross-pollinates, it jumps stages …
15
5 Existing good practice frameworks for key components
Source: Kessler and Sen (2013); van Hemelrjick (2010); Lane et al (2009)
N
16. ICT
(Enabler)
PSSGIs
(Personal Social
Services of General
Interest)
Social
innovation
(New approaches)
Social
investment
(Context &
drivers)
Next steps: discussion points & working groups
• We have an emerging framework:
• Needs refinement
• Needs testing
• Need to resolve detail
• … it is not the final word on the subject
16
C
Impact
assessment
(Non-financial
effects)
• Key questions for this afternoon’s workshops:
• How to evaluate from different perspectives?
(ICT/ social innovation/ social investment/ PSSGIs)
• How to evaluate across different levels?
(micro/ meso/ macro)
• What is the best methodological approach?
Editor's Notes
Sources:
GECES Sub-group on Impact Measurement (2014) Proposed Approaches to Social Impact Measurement in European Commission legislation and in practice relating to: EuSEFs and the EaSI, GECES
G8 Impact Measurement Working Group (2014) Measuring Impact, G8 Impact Measurement Working Group
Lisa Hehenberger, Anna-Marie Harling and Peter Scholten (2013) A Practical Guide to Measuring and Managing Impact, EVPA
Jeremy Nicholls, Eilis Lawlor, Eva Neitzert and Tim Goodspeed (2012) A guide to Social Return on Investment, SROI Network
Sources:
GECES Sub-group on Impact Measurement (2014) Proposed Approaches to Social Impact Measurement in European Commission legislation and in practice relating to: EuSEFs and the EaSI, GECES
G8 Impact Measurement Working Group (2014) Measuring Impact, G8 Impact Measurement Working Group
Lisa Hehenberger, Anna-Marie Harling and Peter Scholten (2013) A Practical Guide to Measuring and Managing Impact, EVPA
Jeremy Nicholls, Eilis Lawlor, Eva Neitzert and Tim Goodspeed (2012) A guide to Social Return on Investment, SROI Network
Source: Neil Reeder and Andrea Colantonio, Measuring Impact and Non-financial Returns in Impact Investing: a Critical Overview of Concepts and Practice (2013) LSE working paper + KHR> http://www.thinknpc.org/publications/smart-money/ see pg 16 for measuring impact on 2 levels (1) of funder on impact creator & (2) at beneficiary level &
Source: Neil Reeder and Andrea Colantonio, Measuring Impact and Non-financial Returns in Impact Investing: a Critical Overview of Concepts and Practice (2013) LSE working paper + KHR> http://www.thinknpc.org/publications/smart-money/ see pg 16 for measuring impact on 2 levels (1) of funder on impact creator & (2) at beneficiary level &
Source: Neil Reeder and Andrea Colantonio, Measuring Impact and Non-financial Returns in Impact Investing: a Critical Overview of Concepts and Practice (2013) LSE working paper
Source: G8 Impact Measurement Working Group (2014) Measuring Impact, G8 Impact Measurement Working Group
Source: Eibhlin Ni Ogain, Sarah Hedley, Tris Lumley (2013) Mapping Outcomes for Social Investment, NPC + KHR> Big Society Capital’s Outcome Matrix http://www.bigsocietycapital.com/outcomes-matrix
Source: IRIS, Getting Started with IRIS, IRIS
Source: Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Hanneke Kruize, Christopher Gidlow et al (2014)
Positive health effects of the natural outdoor environment in typical populations in different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE): a study programme protocol, BMJ Open
> KHR Big Society Capital outcomes matrix: http://www.bigsocietycapital.com/outcomes-matrix
Source: Stephanie Carretero, James Stewart, Clara Centeno, Francesco Barbabella, Andrea Schmidt, Frédérique Lamontagne-Godwin, Giovanni Lamura (2012) Analysis of Evidence from Social Innovation Good Practices across the EU: CARICT Project Summary Report, EU Joint Research Centre
Source: Peter Denning (2012) The Great Principles of Computing in Mircea Pitici (editor) The Best Writing on Mathematics 2011, Princeton University Press
Source: Kessler and Sen (2013) Guidelines to the DCED Standard for Results Measurement: Capturing Wider Changes in the System or Market, DCED
Source: Van Hemelrjick (2010) Case presentation on measuring complex systemic changes, conference on Evaluation in Development, 20th to 21st May 2000