Nader Ale Ebrahim presents on research impact and citation trends in developing countries. He discusses how familiarity with research tools can help increase citations and h-index. Developing countries currently lag behind in impact points and h-index compared to developed nations. However, using research tools to increase visibility can help close this gap over time by improving citation records. The future may see developing countries' current status become the future perspectives of other nations.
Traditional metrics, such as the h-index and journal impact factors, are used to measure the scholarly impact of research. However, in the current climate of accountability by funding providers, fund recipients would benefit from a more comprehensive impact management system (IMS) to facilitate the capture and reporting of narratives (including metrics) about research impact in the academy, on social policy, in industry, and ultimately with the public.
Librarians have always been good at telling and facilitating stories. Research support librarians can use their storytelling skills to contribute to the implementation and administration of an impact management system. Being able to translate research impact into harvestable and reportable metadata is the key.
ALTMETRICS : A HASTY PEEP INTO NEW SCHOLARLY MEASUREMENTSaptarshi Ghosh
The term ‘Altmetrics’ was proposed by Jason Priem, a PhD student at the School of Information and Library Science at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill through a tweet. [https://twitter.com/asnpriem/status/25844968813].
Altmetrics is the combination of two words such as: ‘Alternative’ and ‘Metrics’ in which the ‘alt-‘part refers to alternative types of metrics (that is alternative to traditional metrics such as citation analysis, impact factor, downloads & usage data etc.).
Altmetrics is the creation and study of new metrics based on the Social Web for analyzing, and informing scholarship (http://altmetrics.org/about/). It is the study of new indicators for the analysis of academic activity based on Web 2.0.
Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)Aboul Ella Hassanien
This seminar presented at faculty of Computers Monofiya university on Saturday 12 Dec. 2015. Seminar for researchers and graduate students at Egyptian universities to increase awareness of the importance of publication and scientific research and how to increase the researchers weight, its calculation, and calculation of magazines weight and how to calculate new weights that differ from the impact of the magazines and tips for students attic studies on how to increase citation of the published research papers and How to use open access publishing. In addition discuss the Issues in the field of open access including its advantages and disadvantages
Traditional metrics, such as the h-index and journal impact factors, are used to measure the scholarly impact of research. However, in the current climate of accountability by funding providers, fund recipients would benefit from a more comprehensive impact management system (IMS) to facilitate the capture and reporting of narratives (including metrics) about research impact in the academy, on social policy, in industry, and ultimately with the public.
Librarians have always been good at telling and facilitating stories. Research support librarians can use their storytelling skills to contribute to the implementation and administration of an impact management system. Being able to translate research impact into harvestable and reportable metadata is the key.
ALTMETRICS : A HASTY PEEP INTO NEW SCHOLARLY MEASUREMENTSaptarshi Ghosh
The term ‘Altmetrics’ was proposed by Jason Priem, a PhD student at the School of Information and Library Science at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill through a tweet. [https://twitter.com/asnpriem/status/25844968813].
Altmetrics is the combination of two words such as: ‘Alternative’ and ‘Metrics’ in which the ‘alt-‘part refers to alternative types of metrics (that is alternative to traditional metrics such as citation analysis, impact factor, downloads & usage data etc.).
Altmetrics is the creation and study of new metrics based on the Social Web for analyzing, and informing scholarship (http://altmetrics.org/about/). It is the study of new indicators for the analysis of academic activity based on Web 2.0.
Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)Aboul Ella Hassanien
This seminar presented at faculty of Computers Monofiya university on Saturday 12 Dec. 2015. Seminar for researchers and graduate students at Egyptian universities to increase awareness of the importance of publication and scientific research and how to increase the researchers weight, its calculation, and calculation of magazines weight and how to calculate new weights that differ from the impact of the magazines and tips for students attic studies on how to increase citation of the published research papers and How to use open access publishing. In addition discuss the Issues in the field of open access including its advantages and disadvantages
Improving Research Visibility Part 7: Measuring Research ImpactNader Ale Ebrahim
Measuring research impact by utilizing different metrics, help you to see the bigger picture of your research publications influences. The reach of a publication can no longer be judged exclusively by the number of times it is cited. Because, we are now in the digital and sharing information age, academic conversations are as likely to be found on various academic social networks. So, we need new tools to measure the research impact. Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as alternatives to Impact Factor for journals and personal citation indexes like h-index. Altmetrics attempts to use the online activity to measure impact, buzz, word of mouth for scientific information and it includes new ways to measure usage at the citation level. In this workshop, I will explain about the application of different research metrics especially "alternative metrics" tools such as: Altmetric.com, Impactstory.org, Plumanalytics.com, and PLoS metrics.
Impact Factor Journals as per JCR, SNIP, SJR, IPP, CiteScoreSaptarshi Ghosh
Journal-level metrics
Metrics have become a fact of life in many - if not all - fields of research and scholarship. In an age of information abundance (often termed ‘information overload’), having a shorthand for the signals for where in the ocean of published literature to focus our limited attention has become increasingly important.
Research metrics are sometimes controversial, especially when in popular usage they become proxies for multidimensional concepts such as research quality or impact. Each metric may offer a different emphasis based on its underlying data source, method of calculation, or context of use. For this reason, Elsevier promotes the responsible use of research metrics encapsulated in two “golden rules”. Those are: always use both qualitative and quantitative input for decisions (i.e. expert opinion alongside metrics), and always use more than one research metric as the quantitative input. This second rule acknowledges that performance cannot be expressed by any single metric, as well as the fact that all metrics have specific strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, using multiple complementary metrics can help to provide a more complete picture and reflect different aspects of research productivity and impact in the final assessment. ( Elsevier)
Webinar slides from June 8 Library Connect webinar "Researcher profiles and metrics that matter" with: Chris Belter, Bibliometrics Informationist, NIH Library; Andrea Michalek, VP of Research Metrics, Elsevier | Managing Director of Plum Analytics; Ellen Cole, Scholarly Publications Librarian, Learning and Research Services, Northumbria University.
View the webinar at: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=257883
Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & contextLibrary_Connect
Slides from the May 19, 2016, Library Connect webinar "Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & context" with Jenny Delasalle and Andrew Plume.
Watch the webinar at: https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=199783
Workshop IEEE na USP – Como aumentar o impacto de suas pesquisas e publicaçõesSIBiUSP
Workshop IEEE na USP – Como aumentar o impacto de suas pesquisas e publicações foi realizado dia 05 de junho de 2018 na no Auditório da Engenharia Elétrica da Escola Politécnica da USP. O evento foi promovido pelo Sistema Integrado de Bibliotecas da USP - SIBiUSP, a Divisão de Biblioteca da Escola Politécnica da USP e a Biblioteca do IME USP em parceria com a EBSCO e teve como objetivo apresentar dicas sobre como publicar com o IEEE para aumentar a visibilidade, a atividade de pesquisa e a reputação dos pesquisadores em nível internacional. Ministrante: Paul Canning.
Impact Factor: An Index of Research JournalAJAY SEMALTY
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL OPENKNOWLEDGE or see URL https://youtu.be/nPLnJqLEknY
Research Indices are the indicators of the credibility and recognition of a researcher, a journal, an article and/or and institute. These include Impact Factor, immediacy Index, h-index etc. Researchers and students must know about these indices for better recognition in the academia and research. In the first part of the series we are discussing Impact Factor as a vital research Index. Impact factor (IF) is the most Important basis of selection of journal by the researchers and readers. Its a a measure of the reputation of a journal. IF is a measure of the frequency with which the "average article" in a journal has been cited in a particular year. The OER shall cover how (IF is calculated), Who (provides the IF), on which factors IF depends upon, The importance of IF in academic recognition and knowing the IF of journal. Also SUBSCRIBE OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL OPENKNOWLEDGE or see https://youtu.be/nPLnJqLEknY
Elsevier's Scopus.com upgraded the Journal Analyzer with Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), which measures a source's contextual impact, and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), which measures the scientific prestige of scholarly sources.
These indicators will be applied to all journals indexed by Scopus and will be freely available to both subscribers and non-subscribers @ scopus.com and www.journalmetrics.com
Paradoxical betweenness in Academic endeavors and research metricsSaptarshi Ghosh
Publish or perish" is an aphorism describing the pressure to publish academic work in order to succeed in an academic career. ... The pressure to publish has been cited as a cause of poor work being submitted to academic journals.
Durham Researcher Development Programme 2015-16: Bibliometric Research Indica...Jamie Bisset
There is an ever-increasing need to make your research more visible as you establish your career, and metrics to measure your research performance when it comes to thinking about promotion and probation.
This session will focus on bibliometric research indicators (such as the Journal Impact Factor and SCImago, author metrics such as the h-index and g-index) and sources for accessing citation data (Web of Science, Journal Citation Reports and Google Scholar). These may be one of several factors to consider when thinking about where to submit an article manuscript for publication to maximise the potential academic impact of the research, and tools useful to be familiar with if they form part of any research evaluation you and your authored journal papers may be subject to.
An additional section will also look at tips to consider when writing an article abstract to maximise its discoverability and cite-ability.
Learning Outcomes:
• Understanding of meaning and intended uses of bibliometric research indicators
• Understanding of how some key indicators (JIF, H-index) are calculated
• Ability to make a judgement as to the appropriateness and limitations of such indicators
• Ability to use online datasets to view and calculate key bibliometric measures
• Awareness of some factors which can increase the visibility and discoverability of your own research in bibliographic databases.
Previous participants have said:
"The session has helped provide me with the basic information on Journal Impact and where to find information such as an author's h-index. It will be useful for future journal submission consideration."
"This session was very useful for me to become familiar with the topic."
Durham Leading Research Programme: Academic ImpactJamie Bisset
Aims of the Module
Researchers intending to publish are met with an increasingly complex world of options, influences and pressures. The digital landscape and developments in open access publishing provide additional dissemination channels beyond traditional print; bibliometric tools purport to measure journals’ academic impact ; funder mandates, institutional mandates and routine research assessment exercises place additional requirements on authors which may influence their choice of where and how to publish. The aim of this module is to help researchers navigate this territory and make well- informed decisions.
Content
• Background to the development and use of publication metrics as research indicators, and the issues surrounding this.
• Journal metrics: assess the academic impact of journals, including Journal Impact Factors, Journal Citation Reports and other measures.
• Citations and author metrics: tools available to assess an authors’ individual citation counts and impact, including the h-index.
Approach
The module will take the form of a workshop with on-screen demonstrations and hands-on opportunity, with some presentation and hand-out materials highlighting issues and discussions within the academic community.
Intended outcomes
By the end of the session participants will:
• Increased awareness of the various journal and author metrics available.
• Developed understanding of the key issues around the use of these metrics and what research behaviours might be incentivised.
• Awareness of the potential opportunities for exploring wider academic and non-academic impact of publications from altmetric tools available.
Presented to members of the Psychology department as part of the New Tricks Seminar series (February 2016)
• journal metrics using WoS and Scopus
• article level metrics in WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar, and from publishers and the differences in each. Touch on altmetrics.
• author metrics in the above. Touch on Publish or Perish
Tanya Williamson, Academic Liaison Librarian
Improving Research Visibility Part 7: Measuring Research ImpactNader Ale Ebrahim
Measuring research impact by utilizing different metrics, help you to see the bigger picture of your research publications influences. The reach of a publication can no longer be judged exclusively by the number of times it is cited. Because, we are now in the digital and sharing information age, academic conversations are as likely to be found on various academic social networks. So, we need new tools to measure the research impact. Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as alternatives to Impact Factor for journals and personal citation indexes like h-index. Altmetrics attempts to use the online activity to measure impact, buzz, word of mouth for scientific information and it includes new ways to measure usage at the citation level. In this workshop, I will explain about the application of different research metrics especially "alternative metrics" tools such as: Altmetric.com, Impactstory.org, Plumanalytics.com, and PLoS metrics.
Impact Factor Journals as per JCR, SNIP, SJR, IPP, CiteScoreSaptarshi Ghosh
Journal-level metrics
Metrics have become a fact of life in many - if not all - fields of research and scholarship. In an age of information abundance (often termed ‘information overload’), having a shorthand for the signals for where in the ocean of published literature to focus our limited attention has become increasingly important.
Research metrics are sometimes controversial, especially when in popular usage they become proxies for multidimensional concepts such as research quality or impact. Each metric may offer a different emphasis based on its underlying data source, method of calculation, or context of use. For this reason, Elsevier promotes the responsible use of research metrics encapsulated in two “golden rules”. Those are: always use both qualitative and quantitative input for decisions (i.e. expert opinion alongside metrics), and always use more than one research metric as the quantitative input. This second rule acknowledges that performance cannot be expressed by any single metric, as well as the fact that all metrics have specific strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, using multiple complementary metrics can help to provide a more complete picture and reflect different aspects of research productivity and impact in the final assessment. ( Elsevier)
Webinar slides from June 8 Library Connect webinar "Researcher profiles and metrics that matter" with: Chris Belter, Bibliometrics Informationist, NIH Library; Andrea Michalek, VP of Research Metrics, Elsevier | Managing Director of Plum Analytics; Ellen Cole, Scholarly Publications Librarian, Learning and Research Services, Northumbria University.
View the webinar at: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=257883
Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & contextLibrary_Connect
Slides from the May 19, 2016, Library Connect webinar "Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & context" with Jenny Delasalle and Andrew Plume.
Watch the webinar at: https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=199783
Workshop IEEE na USP – Como aumentar o impacto de suas pesquisas e publicaçõesSIBiUSP
Workshop IEEE na USP – Como aumentar o impacto de suas pesquisas e publicações foi realizado dia 05 de junho de 2018 na no Auditório da Engenharia Elétrica da Escola Politécnica da USP. O evento foi promovido pelo Sistema Integrado de Bibliotecas da USP - SIBiUSP, a Divisão de Biblioteca da Escola Politécnica da USP e a Biblioteca do IME USP em parceria com a EBSCO e teve como objetivo apresentar dicas sobre como publicar com o IEEE para aumentar a visibilidade, a atividade de pesquisa e a reputação dos pesquisadores em nível internacional. Ministrante: Paul Canning.
Impact Factor: An Index of Research JournalAJAY SEMALTY
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL OPENKNOWLEDGE or see URL https://youtu.be/nPLnJqLEknY
Research Indices are the indicators of the credibility and recognition of a researcher, a journal, an article and/or and institute. These include Impact Factor, immediacy Index, h-index etc. Researchers and students must know about these indices for better recognition in the academia and research. In the first part of the series we are discussing Impact Factor as a vital research Index. Impact factor (IF) is the most Important basis of selection of journal by the researchers and readers. Its a a measure of the reputation of a journal. IF is a measure of the frequency with which the "average article" in a journal has been cited in a particular year. The OER shall cover how (IF is calculated), Who (provides the IF), on which factors IF depends upon, The importance of IF in academic recognition and knowing the IF of journal. Also SUBSCRIBE OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL OPENKNOWLEDGE or see https://youtu.be/nPLnJqLEknY
Elsevier's Scopus.com upgraded the Journal Analyzer with Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), which measures a source's contextual impact, and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), which measures the scientific prestige of scholarly sources.
These indicators will be applied to all journals indexed by Scopus and will be freely available to both subscribers and non-subscribers @ scopus.com and www.journalmetrics.com
Paradoxical betweenness in Academic endeavors and research metricsSaptarshi Ghosh
Publish or perish" is an aphorism describing the pressure to publish academic work in order to succeed in an academic career. ... The pressure to publish has been cited as a cause of poor work being submitted to academic journals.
Durham Researcher Development Programme 2015-16: Bibliometric Research Indica...Jamie Bisset
There is an ever-increasing need to make your research more visible as you establish your career, and metrics to measure your research performance when it comes to thinking about promotion and probation.
This session will focus on bibliometric research indicators (such as the Journal Impact Factor and SCImago, author metrics such as the h-index and g-index) and sources for accessing citation data (Web of Science, Journal Citation Reports and Google Scholar). These may be one of several factors to consider when thinking about where to submit an article manuscript for publication to maximise the potential academic impact of the research, and tools useful to be familiar with if they form part of any research evaluation you and your authored journal papers may be subject to.
An additional section will also look at tips to consider when writing an article abstract to maximise its discoverability and cite-ability.
Learning Outcomes:
• Understanding of meaning and intended uses of bibliometric research indicators
• Understanding of how some key indicators (JIF, H-index) are calculated
• Ability to make a judgement as to the appropriateness and limitations of such indicators
• Ability to use online datasets to view and calculate key bibliometric measures
• Awareness of some factors which can increase the visibility and discoverability of your own research in bibliographic databases.
Previous participants have said:
"The session has helped provide me with the basic information on Journal Impact and where to find information such as an author's h-index. It will be useful for future journal submission consideration."
"This session was very useful for me to become familiar with the topic."
Durham Leading Research Programme: Academic ImpactJamie Bisset
Aims of the Module
Researchers intending to publish are met with an increasingly complex world of options, influences and pressures. The digital landscape and developments in open access publishing provide additional dissemination channels beyond traditional print; bibliometric tools purport to measure journals’ academic impact ; funder mandates, institutional mandates and routine research assessment exercises place additional requirements on authors which may influence their choice of where and how to publish. The aim of this module is to help researchers navigate this territory and make well- informed decisions.
Content
• Background to the development and use of publication metrics as research indicators, and the issues surrounding this.
• Journal metrics: assess the academic impact of journals, including Journal Impact Factors, Journal Citation Reports and other measures.
• Citations and author metrics: tools available to assess an authors’ individual citation counts and impact, including the h-index.
Approach
The module will take the form of a workshop with on-screen demonstrations and hands-on opportunity, with some presentation and hand-out materials highlighting issues and discussions within the academic community.
Intended outcomes
By the end of the session participants will:
• Increased awareness of the various journal and author metrics available.
• Developed understanding of the key issues around the use of these metrics and what research behaviours might be incentivised.
• Awareness of the potential opportunities for exploring wider academic and non-academic impact of publications from altmetric tools available.
Presented to members of the Psychology department as part of the New Tricks Seminar series (February 2016)
• journal metrics using WoS and Scopus
• article level metrics in WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar, and from publishers and the differences in each. Touch on altmetrics.
• author metrics in the above. Touch on Publish or Perish
Tanya Williamson, Academic Liaison Librarian
http://inarocket.com
Learn BEM fundamentals as fast as possible. What is BEM (Block, element, modifier), BEM syntax, how it works with a real example, etc.
10 Insightful Quotes On Designing A Better Customer ExperienceYuan Wang
In an ever-changing landscape of one digital disruption after another, companies and organisations are looking for new ways to understand their target markets and engage them better. Increasingly they invest in user experience (UX) and customer experience design (CX) capabilities by working with a specialist UX agency or developing their own UX lab. Some UX practitioners are touting leaner and faster ways of developing customer-centric products and services, via methodologies such as guerilla research, rapid prototyping and Agile UX. Others seek innovation and fulfilment by spending more time in research, being more inclusive, and designing for social goods.
Experience is more than just an interface. It is a relationship, as well as a series of touch points between your brand and your customer. Here are our top 10 highlights and takeaways from the recent UX Australia conference to help you transform your customer experience design.
For full article, continue reading at https://yump.com.au/10-ways-supercharge-customer-experience-design/
How to Build a Dynamic Social Media PlanPost Planner
Stop guessing and wasting your time on networks and strategies that don’t work!
Join Rebekah Radice and Katie Lance to learn how to optimize your social networks, the best kept secrets for hot content, top time management tools, and much more!
Watch the replay here: bit.ly/socialmedia-plan
Lightning Talk #9: How UX and Data Storytelling Can Shape Policy by Mika Aldabaux singapore
How can we take UX and Data Storytelling out of the tech context and use them to change the way government behaves?
Showcasing the truth is the highest goal of data storytelling. Because the design of a chart can affect the interpretation of data in a major way, one must wield visual tools with care and deliberation. Using quantitative facts to evoke an emotional response is best achieved with the combination of UX and data storytelling.
Content personalisation is becoming more prevalent. A site, it's content and/or it's products, change dynamically according to the specific needs of the user. SEO needs to ensure we do not fall behind of this trend.
Succession “Losers”: What Happens to Executives Passed Over for the CEO Job?
By David F. Larcker, Stephen A. Miles, and Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series
Overview:
Shareholders pay considerable attention to the choice of executive selected as the new CEO whenever a change in leadership takes place. However, without an inside look at the leading candidates to assume the CEO role, it is difficult for shareholders to tell whether the board has made the correct choice. In this Closer Look, we examine CEO succession events among the largest 100 companies over a ten-year period to determine what happens to the executives who were not selected (i.e., the “succession losers”) and how they perform relative to those who were selected (the “succession winners”).
We ask:
• Are the executives selected for the CEO role really better than those passed over?
• What are the implications for understanding the labor market for executive talent?
• Are differences in performance due to operating conditions or quality of available talent?
• Are boards better at identifying CEO talent than other research generally suggests?
Do you know “Over 43% of ISI papers has never received any citations?” (nature.com/top100, 2014). Publishing a high quality paper in scientific journals is only halfway towards receiving citation in the future. The rest of the journey is dependent on disseminating the publications via proper utilization of the “Research Tools”. Proper tools allow the researchers to increase the research impact and citations for their publications. These workshop series will provide various techniques on how one can increase the visibility and enhance the impact of one’s research work.
Analysis of Bibliometrics information for selecting the best field of studyNader Ale Ebrahim
Bibliometrics can be defined as the statistical analysis of publications. Bibliometrics has focused on the quantitative analysis of citations and citation counts which is complex. It is so complex and specialized that personal knowledge and experience are insufficient tools for understanding trends for making decisions. We need tools for analysis of Bibliometrics information for select the best field of study with promising enough attention. This presentation will provide tools to discover the new trends in our field of study in order to select an area for research and publication which promising the highest research impact.
Research Skills Session 4: Evaluate a paper qualityNader Ale Ebrahim
Assessing the quality of a paper is a challenging issue. So, there is a requirement to evaluate a paper based on some other metrics which cover many aspects of publication quality. The quality of the article can be estimated by many aspects, such as, the number of citations, the journal IF, the author h-index, the Altmetric score, number of views, and the paper content itself. The workshop concentrates on how to evaluate and measure a paper quality by introducing some indicators.
Strategies to enhance research visibility, impact & citations by nader ale e...Nader Ale Ebrahim
Do you know “Over 43% of ISI papers have never ever received any citations?” (nature.com/top100, 2014). Now it’s time to start spreading the word around your findings and analysis. Publishing a high quality paper in scientific journals is only halfway towards receiving citation in the future. The rest of the journey is dependent on disseminating the publications via using the proper “Research Tools”. Proper utilization of the tools allows the researchers to increase the research impact and citations for their publications. This workshop will provide you various techniques on how you can increase the visibility and hence the impact of your research work.
Research Tools: Enhancing visibility and impact of the researchNader Ale Ebrahim
“Research Tools” can be defined as vehicles that broadly facilitate research and related activities. Scientific tools enable researchers to collect, organize, analyze, visualize and publicized research outputs. Dr. Nader has collected over 700 tools that enable students to follow the correct path in research and to ultimately produce high-quality research outputs with more accuracy and efficiency. It is assembled as an interactive Web-based mind map, titled “Research Tools”, which is updated periodically. “Research Tools” consists of a hierarchical set of nodes. It has four main nodes: (1) Searching the literature, (2) Writing a paper, (3) Targeting suitable journals, and (4) Enhancing visibility and impact of the research. Several free tools can be found in the child nodes. In this workshop some tools as examples from the part 4 (Enhancing visibility and impact of the research) will be described. The e-skills learned from the workshop are useful across various research disciplines and research institutions.
A researcher impact, may measure by number of publications and counting the number of times it has been cited by other scholars. A recent study discovered that over 43% of ISI papers have never ever received any citations (nature.com/top100, 2014). Now it’s time to start spreading the word around your findings and analysis. Publishing a high quality paper in scientific journals is only halfway towards receiving citation in the future. The rest of the journey is dependent on disseminating the publications via using the proper “Research Tools”. Proper utilization of the tools allows the researchers to increase the research impact and citations for their publications. This workshop provides some techniques to increase the visibility and hence the impact of your research work.
How to increase h-index; “Advertise and disseminate publications” By: Nader A...Nader Ale Ebrahim
Publishing a high quality paper in scientific journals is a halfway of receiving citation in the future. The rest of the way is advertising and disseminating the publications by using the proper “Research Tools”. Familiarity with the tools allows the researcher to increase his/her h-index in the short time. H-index shows the academicians influences in the specified field of research. Therefore, a person with higher level of h-index has more high quality publications with high amount of citations. This presentation, covers the following topics: Why publish and increase h-index?, Definition of h-index and g-index, Importance of h-index, How to use “Research Tools” Mind Map, Paper title preparation, Selecting keywords, Select the proper journal, Advertise published article, and finally Trace published article citation.
Sole reliance on citation data provides an incomplete understanding of research. Although citation analysis may be simple to apply, it should be used with caution to avoid it coming under disrepute through uncritical use. Ideally, citation analysis should be performed to supplement, not replace, a robust system of expert review to determine the actual quality and impact of published research.
Bibliometrics can be defined as the statistical analysis of publications. Bibliometrics has focused on the quantitative analysis of citations and citation counts which is complex. It is so complex and specialized that personal knowledge and experience are insufficient for understanding trends and then making decisions. We need tools for analysis of bibliometrics information to recognize the research trends and evaluate scientific/institution/country’s research productivity. This presentation will provide procedure to write a Bibliometrics paper.
Importance of research metrics in scientific researchTutors India
Research metrics are considered as an important tool in assessing the academics papers for institutions or academic organizations. It is utilized as the form of the quality assessment tool for performing normal science research. The h-index is considered as the commonly used form of author level metric which helps to report the author’s output depending on the total publication and total citations made in research work. This study discussed the importance of research metrics and its difference with h-index in respect to academic research.
Contact:
Website: www.tutorsindia.com
Email: info@tutorsindia.com
United Kingdom: +44-1143520021
India: +91-4448137070
Whatsapp Number: +91-8754446690
Higher education is increasingly becoming a global business. The main factor to distinguish between different universities is university ranking. There are numerous university ranking systems that include a number of citations as one of the measuring indicators. The citations may come from high quality research and publications. However, publishing a high quality paper in scientific journals is only halfway towards receiving citation in the future. The rest of the journey is dependent on disseminating the publications via proper utilization of the “Research Tools”. Proper tools allow the researchers to increase the research impact and citations for their publications. This workshop series will provide various techniques on how one can increase the visibility and enhance the impact of one’s research work.
Maximized Research Impact: An Effective Strategies for Increasing CitationsNader Ale Ebrahim
The high competitive environment has forced higher education authorities to set their strategies to improve university ranking. Citations of published papers are among the most widely used inputs to measure national and global university ranking (which accounts for 20% of QS, 30% of THE, and etc.). Therefore, from one hand, improving the citation impact of a search is one of the university manager’s strategies. On the other hand, the researchers are also looking for some helpful techniques to increase their citation record. This chapter by reviewing the relevant articles covers 48 different strategies for maximizing research impact and visibility. The results show that some features of article can help predict the number of article views and citation counts. The findings presented in this chapter could be used by university authorities, authors, reviewers, and editors to maximize the impact of articles in the scientific community.
Bibliometrics can be defined as the statistical analysis of publications. Bibliometrics has focused on the quantitative analysis of citations and citation counts which is complex. It is so complex and specialized that personal knowledge and experience are insufficient for understanding trends and then making decisions. We need tools for analysis of bibliometrics information to recognize the research trends and evaluate scientific/institution/country’s research productivity. This presentation will provide procedure to write a Bibliometrics paper.
Microblogging for Enhancing the Research AccessibilityNader Ale Ebrahim
There are statistically significant associations between higher citations for articles and the use of various social networking sites such as Twitter, Facebook, blogs and forums. Twitter is a microblogging tool and social media site created in 2006 that gives you a chance to share quick thoughts using not more than 140 characters in a post. It’s a great way to share your current research, publications and links to achieve maximum publicity. Twitter assist you to stay current with the literature and new developments in your field of interest. Proper tools allow the researchers to increase the research impact and citations. This presentation will provide various techniques on how microblogging improving your research impact and visibility.
Similar to The academic impact of research: Current and the future citation trends in developing countries (20)
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
The academic impact of research: Current and the future citation trends in developing countries
1. Name : Nader Ale Ebrahim
Organization: Research Support Unit, Centre of Research
Services, IPPP, University of Malaya
Title: The academic impact of research: Current and
the future citation trends in developing countries
2. Abstract
Writing an article for online distribution in a way that maximized the
chances of citation hits, is different from preparing one for print journals in
some small, but important, respects. To be cited, articles have to be visible
in an electronic environment. Therefore, publishing a high quality paper in
scientific journals will be a halfway of receiving citation in the future. The
rest of the way is advertising and disseminating the publications by using
the proper “Research Tools”. Familiarity with the tools allows the
researcher to increase his/her h-index in the short time.
The number of citations has over 30% share in academic ranking. Hence,
most of the scientists are looking for a method to increase their citation
record. Nader developed and introduced a method for increasing the
visibility and impact of the research which directly effects on the number
of citations. This talk tends to introduce some of the key points for
improving the citation trends in developing countries by presenting the
current situation and the future trends.
Keywords: h-index, Increase citations, Research tools
2 @NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
3. Outline
Abstract - where we are today, and where we want to be in the future.
Introduction - Research impact,Trends in scholarly research,A variety of
indicators.
General explanation -Why citation metrics?,Why citation is important?
Problem Statement - “Impact Points" gap, H-index differences, OpenAccess
Repositories.
Objectives - Enhancing research visibility and improving citations records.
Methodology - Compare institutions.
What is new - Introduce “ResearchTools” for increasing the visibility and
impact of the research.
Result –The gap between the developed and developing countries.
Conclusion & FutureWorks – Use “ResearchTools” and the field rankings
table as a reference.
3 @NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
4. Research impact
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
4
# of and value of Grants awarded
# of awards (e.g. Nobel Prizes)
Peer evaluation
Publication counts
Citation counts/citation metrics
• Citation metrics are one piece of
the research performance puzzle.
Combination of factors
None of these measure works perfectly on its own, there are always
anomalies and human judgment is required to interpret the results
Funding data
Citation data
Awards/Honors
Peer review
Ann Kushmerick (2013), Using bibliometrics in research evaluation: An Introduction, Research Evaluation and Bibliometric Data, Thomson Reuters
5. A variety of indicators
5
Metric Calculation Evaluator Questions
Productivity • # papers
• share of papers in field
• # papers
• # papers in field/ papers in field
• What is the research output of X? (a country,
subject, researcher, etc.)
Impact
• # citations
• h-index
• # citations
• Number of papers (N) with at least
N citations each.
• What is the overall impact and/or
productivity of a body of work?
Influence
• Average citation rate (CPP)
• Percent of papers cited
• Total citations/Total papers
• # papers with at least one citation/
Total # papers in population
• What is the rate at which a body of work is
cited?
• How many papers get cited? Never get cited?
Relative Impact
• Journal performance ratio
• Category performance ratio
• Percentile in category and mean
percentile
• % papers in top x% of their
field
• Sum of citations/sum of journal or
category expected citation rates
• Percentile placement of article
within a journal category
• Has this body of work performed better than
average vis-à-vis the journals or scientific
disciplines represented?
• How has this body of work performed
compared to the disciplines represented?
• What proportion of a body of work achieves
a specific level of performance?
Ann Kushmerick (2013), Using bibliometrics in research evaluation: An Introduction, Research Evaluation and Bibliometric Data, Thomson Reuters
6. Trends in scholarly research
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
6
Competition for government research funding increasing
Available funding decreasing
Competition for top research faculty is on the rise
Accountability:
– Research spending
– Demonstrating return on investment (ROI)
Proving the institution’s quality of research to:
– Prospective students
– Prospective faculty members/research staff
– Investors/donors
Ann Kushmerick (2013), Using bibliometrics in research evaluation: An Introduction, Research Evaluation and Bibliometric Data, Thomson Reuters
7. Why citation metrics?
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
7
The primary and most common way to quantitatively track
and measure research outcomes.
Uses data on peer reviewed journals and citations received
by those articles.
Citations are an indicator of an article’s impact and
usefulness to the worldwide research community; they are
the mode by which peers acknowledge each other’s
research.
Citation metrics are:
Transparent
Repeatable
Easily understood
Ann Kushmerick (2013), Using bibliometrics in research evaluation: An Introduction, Research Evaluation and Bibliometric Data, Thomson Reuters
8. Why citation is important?
In theTimes Higher EducationWorld University Rankings system Citations — research influence
(worth 32.5 per cent).
Citations are widely recognised as a strong indicator of the significance and relevance — that is, the impact — of a piece of research.
However, citation data must be used with care as citation rates can vary between subjects and time periods.
For example, papers in the life sciences tend to be cited more frequently than those published in the social sciences.
The rankings this year use normalised citation impact, where the citations to each paper are compared with the average number of
citations received by all papers published in the same field and year. So a paper with a relative citation impact of 2.0 is cited twice as
frequently as the average for similar papers.
The data were extracted from theThomson Reuters resource known asWeb of Science, the largest and most comprehensive database
of research citations available.
Its authoritative and multidisciplinary content covers more than 11,600 of the highest-impact journals worldwide.The benchmarking
exercise is carried out on an exact level across 251 subject areas for each year in the period 2004 to 2008.
For institutions that produce few papers, the relative citation impact may be significantly influenced by one or two highly cited
papers and therefore it does not accurately reflect their typical performance. However, institutions publishing fewer than 50 papers a
year have been excluded from the rankings.
There are occasions where a groundbreaking academic paper is so influential as to drive the citation counts to extreme levels —
receiving thousands of citations.An institution that contributes to one of these papers will receive a significant and noticeable boost
to its citation impact, and this reflects such institutions' contribution to globally significant research projects.
Source: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2010-2011/analysis-methodology.html
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
8
10. h-index (Jorge E. Hirsch- 2005)
A scientist has index h if h of
[his/her] Np papers have at least h
citations each,and the other
(Np − h) papers have no more
than h citations each.
H-index from a plot of decreasing citations for numbered papers
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
10
12. g-index (Leo Egghe (2006))
In order to give more weight to highly-cited articles Leo Egghe
(2006) proposed the g-index.The g-index is defined as follows:
[Given a set of articles] ranked in decreasing order of the
number of citations that they received,the g-index is the
(unique) largest number such that the top g articles received
(together) at least g2 citations.Although the g-index has not
yet attracted much attention or empirical verification, it would
seem to be a very useful complement to the h-index.
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
12
15. Web application to calculate the single
publication h index
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
Source: http://labs.dbs.uni-leipzig.de/gsh/
15
The single publication h index has been introduced by Schubert (2009) as the h-index
calculated from the list of citing publications of one single publication.
38. Regional interest in H-Index
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
38
Data retrieved from Google Trend on 18 October 2013
39. Compare Institutions
Time Period: 1981-2012 Cumulative
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
39
Source: InCites – Data retrieved on 26 June 2013
40. Compare Institutions
Time Period: 2008-2012 Cumulative
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
40
Source: InCites – Data retrieved on 26 June 2013
41. Compare Institutions – Cite per Document
Time Period: 2008-2012 Cumulative
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
41
Source: InCites – Data retrieved on 26 June 2013
67. What is new
• Nader developed and introduced “Research Tools” for increasing
the visibility and impact of the research which directly effects on the
number of citations.
67 @NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
68. Conclusion
Publishing research output in high-impact journals is a primary
concern of researchers. But once their works are published,
they are concerned about citation which is directly related to
the paper’s quality and visibility. The institutions in the
developing countries should provide open access repository for
their researchers. Next, the institutions/researchers can apply
Nader’s method (Research Tools) for increasing the visibility of
their papers.
The field rankings table can be a reference for developing
countries to select a field of study in the future.
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
68
Ale Ebrahim, N., et al., Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency. International Education Studies, 2013. 6(11): p. 93-99.
70. 70
Please contact me through:
Email: aleebrahim [At] um [Dot] edu [Dot] my
Website: http://aleebrahim.com/
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
71. References
1. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2012). Publication Marketing Tools “Enhancing Research Visibility and Improving Citations”. Research Tools in Education Series, 1(2), 1-86.
http://works.bepress.com/aleebrahim/64/
2. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). Introduction to the Research Tools Mind Map. Research World, 10(4), 1-3.
3. Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Habibi Tanha, F., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S. M., & Ordi, A. (2013). Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency.
International Education Studies, 6(11), 93-99. doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n11p93
4. Ball, P. (2011, 6 May). Are scientific reputations boosted artificially?, Nature
5. Corbyn, Z. (2010). An easy way to boost a paper's citations. Nature doi: 10.1038/news.2010.406
6. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics. 69, 131-152.
7. Emerald Guide. (2012). How to... write an abstract. Retrieved 09 May, 2013, from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/write/abstracts.htm?part=1
8. Farhadi, H., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M., Aghaei Chadegani, A., Farhadi, M., Fooladi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). Does it matter which citation tool is used to compare the
h-index of a group of highly cited researchers? Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(4), 198-202.
9. Fooladi, M., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, M., Aghaei Chadegani, A., Farhadi, H., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact
Factor? Asian Social Science, 9(5), 176-182. doi: 10.5539/ass.v9n5p176
10. Frost, R. (2009). Case study: Open Access visibility and impact of an individual researcher. Retrieved 9 May, 2013, from
http://www.openscholarship.org/jcms/c_6220/case-study-open-access-visibility-and-impact-of-an-individual-researcher
11. Jones, K., & Evans, K. (2013). Good Practices for Improving Citations to your Published Work (pp. 2). University of BATH.
12. LiU E-Press. (2007). One way to increase citation frequency. Retrieved 9 May, 2013, from http://www.ep.liu.se/authorinf/postpubl.en.asp
13. SAGE. (2012). 10 Ways to Increase Usage and Citation of your Published Article Using Social Media. Retrieved 9 May, 2013, from
http://www.sagepub.com/authors/journal/10ways.sp
14. Sarli, C., & Holmes, K. (2011). Strategies for Enhancing the Impact of Research. Retrieved 9 May, 2013, from https://becker.wustl.edu/impact-assessment/strategies
15. Swan, A. (2010). The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Monograph (Technical Report) Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268516/
16. Taylor & Francis Group. (2012a). Optimize citations. Retrieved 9 May, 2013, from http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/beyondpublication/optimizingcitations.asp
17. Taylor & Francis Group. (2012b). Promote your article. Retrieved 9 May, 2013, from http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/beyondpublication/promotearticle.asp
18. Thor, A., & Bornmann, L. (2011). The calculation of the single publication h index and related performance measures: a web application based on Google Scholar data. Online
Information Review 35(2), 291-300.
@NaderAle Ebrahim 2013-2015
71