Download to read offline
Uploaded byPRIYANK JAIN
Hydro Power Harnessing priyank
- Over 97,000 MW of India's hydro potential remains untapped despite efforts to encourage private participation in hydro development. - Hydro capacity addition has been declining, with only 1,181 MW added in 2010-2011, well below targets. - Major challenges include stringent environmental norms, poor infrastructure, and rising development costs due to issues around land acquisition and local opposition. - States are implementing various policies to promote private investment, but challenges remain around taxation and delays in clearances for projects. - Over 15,000 MW of hydro projects are currently under execution, but harnessing India's full hydro potential could help meet energy and climate goals.
More Related Content
Similar to Hydro Power Harnessing priyank
Hydro Power Harnessing priyank
- 1.
- 2. Topics • Status anddevelopment • Upcoming capacity • Challenges • Way ahead
- 3. Introduction • Over 97,000MW of the country’s total hydro potential remains untapped. • Hydro capacity addition has steadily declines ,even after states have encouraged the private participation.
- 5. Ifs and buts Benefits MinimumCost volatility Economics of scale Clean power generation But Stringent environmental norms Poor infrastructure support Growing development challenges
- 6. Status 2010-2011 10% growth GoodMonsoon • 1,181 MWAddition • 60% Northern & Southern • Generation Fall per MW • 3.97MUs(94-95) to 2.96 (10-11) Industry Report Dec 2011 617 Units 177 stations 38,748 MW
- 7. Performance of HYDROpower plants depends Seasonal Variation Water Flow (Depletion in river flow due to Silting) Variable demand Plant performance & Poor Maintenance Environmental & Forest clearance Lack of Policy clarity on potential site
- 8. Development Facts • JaiprakashPower Ventures Limited’s commissioned 1,000 MW in Karcham Wangtoo . 7,000 MW Shifting 11th 12th plan 4.32% 2009-10 39 MW Growth 2003-04 2010-11
- 9. Hydro Power Generations 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 AprilMay June July August Sep Oct Nov Dec Actual Target
- 11. State initiatives :Topromote private participation Himachal Pradesh J & K Arunachal Pradesh Sikkim Uttarakhand Mizoram
- 12. Playing with Policies •Policy criteria to allocate the capacities have been mostly based on : • Upfront premium • Share of free power • Joint ventures • Majorly allotted under Build-own-operate- transfer model. • Mizoram sought viability gap funding from the union government under a PPP model .
- 13. Power Plant 49% 31% 20% Hydro Plant Publicprivate PPP
- 14. But…………… • But J&Kunder Water Resource Act,2010 impose a tax on NHPC of Rs.1.5 billion for using water. • Soon Himachal Pradesh also introducing HP electricity (Taxation of generation) Bill .
- 15. And……………. • NTPC ‘s600 MW Loharinagpala project was scrapped due to local & religious issues. • Due to delayed environmental clearances AP’s 3,000 MW Dibang project recorded cost escalations of up to Rs 25 billion. • ADB & WB are encouraging state governments to adopt practices such as comprehensive social and economic planning for projects.
- 16. Upcoming capacity Currently Execution15,000 MW 12th plan Capacity Addition 20,334 MW 102 projects 30,193 MW Evaluated for commercial viability ¾ in AP only
- 18. Untapped Hydro Capacity(CEA) 45,000 12,000 10,500 7,000 2,100 2,000 1,800 1,780 1,200 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 AP UK J&K HP KT WB CG MZ Other Capacity Capacity
- 19. Challenges • Project completionrisk (6-7 years) • Infrastructure challenges
- 20. Way ahead • Hugeuntapped potential. • Cleaner choice. • Can help to achieving its voluntary international commitment to reduce carbon intensity by 15 % in coming 8 -10 years.