9. Understanding the Community of Inquiry
“A critical community of learners, from an educational perspective, is
composed of teachers and students transacting with the specific purposes of
facilitating, constructing, and validating understanding , and of developing
capabilities that will lead to further learning.”
-Garrison and Anderson
25. Helpful
strongly
disagree
2%
neutral
17%
agree
51%
strongly agree
30%
The instructor was helpful in guiding the class towards
understanding course topics in a way that helped me
clarify my thinking.
27. Sense of Community
neutral
9%
agree
59%
strongly agree
32%
Instructor actions reinforced the development of a sense
of community among course participants.
32. Motivation
neutral
9%
agree
53%
strongly agree
38%
I felt motivated to explore content related questions.
33. Knowledge Applicability
neutral
7%
agree
49%
strongly agree
44%
I can apply the knowledge created in this course to
my work or other non-class related activites.
42. References
• Akyol, Z. & Garrision, D.R. (n.d.). The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online
Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive, and Teaching
Prescence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 3-22. Retrieved from
http://sloanconsortium.org/system/files/v11n1_8garrison.pdf
• Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy . The
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Retrieved from
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890/1663
• Brinthaupt, T.M., Fisher, L.S., Gardner, J.G., Raffo, D.M., & Woodard, J.B. (2011). What the best
online teachers should do. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7 (4), 515-524. Retrieved from
http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no4/brinthaupt_1211.htm
• Broup, J., West, R., & Graham, C. (2011). Improving online social presence through asynchronous
video. Internet and Higher Education, (15), 195-203.
• deWaard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., and Rodriguez, O.,
(2011). Using mlearning and moocs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in
education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 94-115.
Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1046/2026
• Downes, S. (2012, March 23). [Web log message]. Retrieved from
http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2012/03/education-as-platform-mooc-experience.html
• Dunlap, J.C. & Lowenthal, P.R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social
presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20 (2)
• ELI (2013). 7 things you should know about... Calibrated Peer Reviews. Retrived from
https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7101.pdf.
43. References
• Fini, A., (2009). The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the
CCK08 Course Tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5),
1-26. Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/643/1402
• Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2013). Community matters: Social presence and learning outcomes.
Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13 (1), 11-86. Retrived from
http://josotl.indiana.edu/article/views/3268/3623
• Ice,P., Curtis, R., Phillips,P. & Wells, J. (2007). Using Asynchronous Audio Feedback to Enhance
Teaching Presence and Students’ Sense of Community. Jones, P., Naugle, K. Kolloff, M.(2008,
March). Teacher Presence: Using Introductory Videos in Online and Hybrid Courses.Learning
Solutions Magazine, 1-5. Retrived
from http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/107/teacher-presence-using-introductory-videos-
in-online-and-hybrid-courses/pageall%20.
• Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence of adult students.
Computers & Education, 55, 808-820, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.013.
• Keengwe, J. Adjei-Boateng, E., & Diteeyont, W. (2012). Facilitating active social presence and
meaningful interactions in online learning. Education Information Technology, (18), 597-607. doi:
10.1007/s10639-012-9197-9
• Kop, R., & Carroll, F. (2011). Cloud computing and creativity: Learning on a massive open online
course. European Journal of Open, Distance, and eLearning, Retrieved from
http://www.eurodl.org/?article=457
• Kop, R., Fournier, H., and Mak, J. (2011). A Pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support
Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. The International Review of
Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-93. Retrieved from
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1041/2025
44. References
• Mak, W., Williams, R., & Mackness, J. (2010). Blogs and forums as communication and learning
tools in a mooc. Paper presented at 7th international conference on networked learning
2010. Retrieved from
http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/Mak.pdf
• McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The mooc model for digital
practice. (Master's thesis, University of Prince Edward Island, Prince Edward Island, Canada).
Retrieved from http://davecormier.com/edblog/wp-content/uploads/MOOC_Final.pdf
• Mills, B.J (2010).Idea Paper #47: Promoting Deep Learning. The Idea
Center.http://www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/IDEA_Paper_47.pdf
• Nagel, L., & Kotze, T. (2010). Supersizing e-learning: What a coi survery reveals about teaching
prescence in a large online class. Internet and Higher Education, (13), 45-51.
• Rodriguez, C. (2012). Moocs and the ai-stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct
course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning,
Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=current&article=516
• Siemens, G. (2004, December 12). [Web log message]. Retrieved from
http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
• Williams, R., Karousou, R., and Mackness, J., (2011). Emergent Learning and Learning Ecologies
in Web 2.0. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 39-59.
Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/883/1686
Editor's Notes
Students want to know their instructor. This challenges online faculty to integrate technologies, such as avatars, video, and social media, to introduce their digital personalities and enhance learners’ experiences. This is called “humanizing,” which, according to DuCharme-Hansen, Dupin-Bryant, 2005 “reduces the psychological distance between the students and the instructor.”
As online learning initiatives continue to expand, so does the need to leverage new learning technology to ensure students feel connected and engaged with the instructor and the course material.
Course Objectives:
Learn how to integrate educational technology tools into an online course with an emphasis on technology that can create an instructor presence or increase personal interaction.
Share insights and suggestions about how to “humanize” online courses by maximizing the use of flexible educational technology tools.
Demonstrate how technology-facilitated interactions can make instructors and learners more "real" online and how this correlates with student learning and retention.