This document discusses evaluating the safety performance of contractors. It notes that lagging indicators like OSHA logs only show past performance, while leading indicators can predict future safety. The BROWZ OneView system allows tracking various leading indicators for each contractor, helping choose safe contractors. It also describes BROWZ's contractor safety assessment program which audits contractors' safety programs and management systems, providing a standardized evaluation to improve contractor safety.

2. Agenda
Why evaluate safety of contractors
Potential scenarios
Lagging indicators
Demo of BROWZ OneView
Leading indicators
Achievable results

3. David Askvig
Corporate Marketing
Manager, BROWZ
Corporate Marketing
Manager, BROWZ
Dennis Robinson
Business Development,
BROWZ
Business Development
BROWZ
Pat Cunningham
Director of Safety & Auditing
Services, BROWZ Safety &
Auditing Services
BROWZ
Upcoming Webinars > www.browz.com/webinar
Presenters

4. Why
It’s important to evaluate
the safety performance of
contractors?

6. • You hire a company to perform
a service.
• You reviewed their OSHA logs
• They appear to be a safe and
qualified company

11. TRR LWR DART
4.8
0.0 0.0
Rates Before
(incorrectly reported)
TRR LWR DART
9.5
4.8
9.5
Rates After
(correctly reported)
TRR LWR DART
2.6
0.9
2.0
Industry Avg.

14. [Experience Modification Rate]
Experience modifier or experience modification is a term used
in the American insurance business and more specifically in
workers' compensation insurance. It is the adjustment of annual
premium based on previous loss experience.

16. Health & Safety
Annual Accident
History
Injury & Illness Rates
Citations & Violations
Safety Programs &
Policies
Safety Manual Audits
Insurance & Risk
Certificates
Policy Types & Limits
Endorsements
AM Best Ratings
Certificate Holders
Supplier Demographics
Industry Codes
Licenses / Expirations
Quality Programs
Supplier Diversity
Ownership
Financial Stability
Bankruptcy
Liens
Judgements
Third Party Financial ratings
Industry Risk Comparison
Corporate Social
Responsibility
Sustainability
Waste Management
Child Labor
Anti-Corruption
Ethics

17. • How will you review and verify data?
• How often should you track?
• Trending data

18. Task Hours per year
Explaining Requirements 1
Answering questions specific to compliance / holding accountable 2
Collecting documentation 1.5
Entering data 1.5
Validating data 2
Monitoring data for expiration / change 2
Coordinating data requests with other departments 2
Total Hours/Year Per Contractor 12
Administrative Burden

19. www.browz.com/roi

20. Filing Cabinets
Excel/Spreadsheets
MS Access
Databases
Administrators

26. TRR – Total Recordable Rate
DART – Days Away Restricted or Transferred
EMR – Experience Modification Rate
LWR – Lost Workday Rate
Regulatory Citations

28. Leading indicators are proactive or predictive
measurements, as opposed to lagging indicators, which
are measurements collected after the fact.

29. BROWZ “Big 6”, Written Safety Program Audits (Federal Level):
1. Hazard Communications, 1910.1200
2. Lock-out/Tag-out, 1910.147
3. Fall Protection, 1926.501 - .503
4. Confined Space/Permit Confined Space, 1926.1201
5. Personal Protective Equipment, 1910.132
6. Emergency Action Plan, 1910.38

30. Regulatory Compliance:
• Injuries happen every day at compliant companies:
• A supplier could have process, but demonstrate poor safety performance
• Employer, employee & contractor relationships critical
• Compliance-based assessment alone provides limited insight –
current phrases:
• “Moving the Curve“
• “Invited Participation”
• “Joint Responsibility”
• “Journey to Safety Excellence”

31. 1. Management Leadership
2. Worker Participation
3. Hazard Identification & Assessment
4. Hazard Prevention & Control
5. Education & Training
6. Program Evaluation & Improvement
7. Communication & Coordination for Host
Employers, Contractors, Staffing Agencies.

32. Assessment objective: “Ability of a company to work safely for the
client”
• Depth of their safety program
• Aid to help client on hiring decisions
Scored best practice assessment – not a pass/fail
Provides a gap analysis for the supplier
Most suppliers want to improve their safety programs & seek
mentoring from their clients
Provides a common language and dialog for on-going discussion
Repeat assessments allow for visibility of program trends

33. “We hope competitor companies are participating in the BROWZ
assessment system, so their safety efforts are also measured.”
“This review will help us be a better safety performing company.”
“…glad to see industry is doing more to evaluate supplier’s safety
programs, which is heading industry in a positive direction.”

34. Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Contractor Assessment
Safety Program Audit
Specialty Audits
Risk

35. BROWZ Outperforms
BROWZ contractors outperform
industry averages for key safety
metrics.

37. www.browz.com/webinar

38. Upcoming Webinars > www.browz.com/webinar
David Askvig
Corporate Marketing
Manager, BROWZ
Corporate Marketing
Manager, BROWZ
Dennis Robinson
Business Development,
BROWZ
Business Development
BROWZ
Pat Cunningham
Director of Safety & Auditing
Services, BROWZROWZ
Request a Demo
www.BROWZ.com/demo