Conduct Risk is sweeping the financial services world and catching many risk manager out as there is still a lack of understanding.
Risk management need to determine the corporate risk philosophy and appetite. To assess or understand the risk philosophy, try to comprehend the organisation's culture, values and environment. The way business operations are conducted on a daily basis and the organisation’s strategy are typically good indicators where you can find the company risk philosophy. Assess whether business has an aggressive, innovative, typical or conservative attitude towards risks for achieving business goals.
Risk appetite is simply the amount of risk which the organisation is willing to take to undertake business activities and achieve the business objectives, where Conduct Risk is concerned this has to include good customer outcomes. A simple question to ask the board of members could be “What amount of reported mismanagement or public uproar would make you uncomfortable if it appeared in the business newspapers?”
Consolidate the various risk exposures from the risk department's identified risks and present them to the board. Finally, assess whether the company’s internal perception and rhetoric on risk philosophy and appetite are consistent with the board and other stakeholder's viewpoints. Realign the two where required to prepare the annual strategy.
Making Conduct Risk [Good] Business As UsualAndrew Smart
Andrew Smart sought to de-mistify some of the market perceptions about Conduct Risk Management and show how to make Conduct Risk Business As Usual. He showed that Conduct Risk Management should not be regarded as a new management framework or process, rather it should be embedded within the business strategy and operational processes.
Watch the full presentation Video on Youtube: http://youtu.be/775wFMtG2oE
Feb 19th 2014 "Enabling Effective Conduct Risk"
Webinar 10:00-11:00 GMT
Focusing on the FCA and the Conduct Risk agenda, in this webinar, "Enabling Effective Conduct Risk", StratexSystems will demonstrate how firms can effectively manage conduct risk by taking an integrated approach to strategy and risk management, and how the StratexPoint solution can support firms as they seek to meet the challenges of conduct risk and engage effectively with the new regulator around this agenda.
During the webinar, StratexSystems will outline:
‘The Seven Key Challenges of Conduct Risk Management’;
Managing and embedding Governance into the business
Definition and embedding the Business Model
Definition and execution of the Business Strategy with customers at its heart
Enabling & embedding Conduct Risk specific processes
Process Management, and specifically New Product Development
Product level performance and risk management
Conduct incident reporting and analysis
StratexSystems will demonstrate during the webinar that Enabling Effective Conduct Risk Management is not about throwing everything that one currently does away and starting afresh but rather building on existing strategy execution and risk management processes and tools.
Additionally, during the webinar we will demonstrate that if firms approach Conduct Risk from the right perspective, they can generate significant value, beyond simply satisfying a regulatory compliance demand.
Embedding RCSA into Strategic Planning and Business StrategyAndrew Smart
Embedding RCSA into Strategic Planning and Business Strategy
This presentation was prepared for the New Generation Operational Risk: Risk Culture and Business Conduct Behaviour conference in Helsinki, Finland.
In this presentation, Ascendore CEO, Andrew Smart outlines how to integrate Risk & Control Self Assessment into the Strategic Planning and Business Strategy.
Based on the Risk-Based Performance Management approach, during this presentation an integrated approach to strategy and risk management is outlined, with risk appetite playing a central role.
Managing Information Risk in Financial Services Andrew Smart
Managing Information Risk in Financial Services Webinar Feb 26th 2014
presented by Colin Lobley
http://manigent.com/uk.linkedin.com/pub/colin-lobley/2/7/563
Many of the fines issued by the FCA over the past few years can be attributed to poor information management. The threats from external cyber-attack and malicious insiders are escalating, with your corporate and client information being the primary target of the cyber criminals. The legal requirement on UK businesses will evolve with the proposed EU data protection regulation likely to come into force next year. It is therefore critical to implement robust information risk management.
Conduct risk beyond the rulebook bovill briefing march 2014Bovill
Bovill - the UK financial services regulatory consultancy - runs regular briefings. These are the slides from the March briefing on Conduct Risk. For more information visit www.bovill.com.
Further information on the event is below:
Conduct Risk: beyond the rule book
“One of the features of regulation, historically, was that it was all about compliance. Were a particular set of rules followed? Could a firm demonstrate and document that it had followed those rules to the letter? This created a cottage industry out of compliance – but did not necessarily lead to good outcomes…””
Martin Wheatley, CEO, Financial Conduct Authority
The FCA rulebook still matters, as any firm who has had a brush with the rules on client money and assets will know. However, the financial crisis showed that traditional compliance can mean the firm only knows what went wrong yesterday. Understanding what might happen tomorrow is equally important.
Managing Conduct Risk is now a key FCA expectation. It involves understanding what outcomes will flow from today’s actions – for the firm, its customers and the financial markets more broadly. And the Conduct Risk agenda is now more likely to involve smaller firms.
Bovill’s briefing looked at Conduct Risk and covered:
• What is Conduct Risk and where did the idea come from?
• What regulatory powers does the FCA use in its approach?
• How can you manage Conduct Risk?
How does Operational Risk Management fit into an organization's Strategic Planning? This presentation attempts to provide a functional and implementable response.
Making Conduct Risk [Good] Business As UsualAndrew Smart
Andrew Smart sought to de-mistify some of the market perceptions about Conduct Risk Management and show how to make Conduct Risk Business As Usual. He showed that Conduct Risk Management should not be regarded as a new management framework or process, rather it should be embedded within the business strategy and operational processes.
Watch the full presentation Video on Youtube: http://youtu.be/775wFMtG2oE
Feb 19th 2014 "Enabling Effective Conduct Risk"
Webinar 10:00-11:00 GMT
Focusing on the FCA and the Conduct Risk agenda, in this webinar, "Enabling Effective Conduct Risk", StratexSystems will demonstrate how firms can effectively manage conduct risk by taking an integrated approach to strategy and risk management, and how the StratexPoint solution can support firms as they seek to meet the challenges of conduct risk and engage effectively with the new regulator around this agenda.
During the webinar, StratexSystems will outline:
‘The Seven Key Challenges of Conduct Risk Management’;
Managing and embedding Governance into the business
Definition and embedding the Business Model
Definition and execution of the Business Strategy with customers at its heart
Enabling & embedding Conduct Risk specific processes
Process Management, and specifically New Product Development
Product level performance and risk management
Conduct incident reporting and analysis
StratexSystems will demonstrate during the webinar that Enabling Effective Conduct Risk Management is not about throwing everything that one currently does away and starting afresh but rather building on existing strategy execution and risk management processes and tools.
Additionally, during the webinar we will demonstrate that if firms approach Conduct Risk from the right perspective, they can generate significant value, beyond simply satisfying a regulatory compliance demand.
Embedding RCSA into Strategic Planning and Business StrategyAndrew Smart
Embedding RCSA into Strategic Planning and Business Strategy
This presentation was prepared for the New Generation Operational Risk: Risk Culture and Business Conduct Behaviour conference in Helsinki, Finland.
In this presentation, Ascendore CEO, Andrew Smart outlines how to integrate Risk & Control Self Assessment into the Strategic Planning and Business Strategy.
Based on the Risk-Based Performance Management approach, during this presentation an integrated approach to strategy and risk management is outlined, with risk appetite playing a central role.
Managing Information Risk in Financial Services Andrew Smart
Managing Information Risk in Financial Services Webinar Feb 26th 2014
presented by Colin Lobley
http://manigent.com/uk.linkedin.com/pub/colin-lobley/2/7/563
Many of the fines issued by the FCA over the past few years can be attributed to poor information management. The threats from external cyber-attack and malicious insiders are escalating, with your corporate and client information being the primary target of the cyber criminals. The legal requirement on UK businesses will evolve with the proposed EU data protection regulation likely to come into force next year. It is therefore critical to implement robust information risk management.
Conduct risk beyond the rulebook bovill briefing march 2014Bovill
Bovill - the UK financial services regulatory consultancy - runs regular briefings. These are the slides from the March briefing on Conduct Risk. For more information visit www.bovill.com.
Further information on the event is below:
Conduct Risk: beyond the rule book
“One of the features of regulation, historically, was that it was all about compliance. Were a particular set of rules followed? Could a firm demonstrate and document that it had followed those rules to the letter? This created a cottage industry out of compliance – but did not necessarily lead to good outcomes…””
Martin Wheatley, CEO, Financial Conduct Authority
The FCA rulebook still matters, as any firm who has had a brush with the rules on client money and assets will know. However, the financial crisis showed that traditional compliance can mean the firm only knows what went wrong yesterday. Understanding what might happen tomorrow is equally important.
Managing Conduct Risk is now a key FCA expectation. It involves understanding what outcomes will flow from today’s actions – for the firm, its customers and the financial markets more broadly. And the Conduct Risk agenda is now more likely to involve smaller firms.
Bovill’s briefing looked at Conduct Risk and covered:
• What is Conduct Risk and where did the idea come from?
• What regulatory powers does the FCA use in its approach?
• How can you manage Conduct Risk?
How does Operational Risk Management fit into an organization's Strategic Planning? This presentation attempts to provide a functional and implementable response.
Conduct Risk. Assessing risk and identifying cultural drivers for clear defin...Compliance Consultant
Conduct Risk is sweeping the financial services world and catching many risk manager out as there is still a lack of understanding.
Our Compliance Manual is available at http://bit.ly/ComplianceManualTemplate
Risk management need to determine the corporate risk philosophy and appetite. To assess or understand the risk philosophy, try to comprehend the organisation's culture, values and environment. The way business operations are conducted on a daily basis and the organisation’s strategy are typically good indicators where you can find the company risk philosophy. Assess whether business has an aggressive, innovative, typical or conservative attitude towards risks for achieving business goals.
Risk appetite is simply the amount of risk which the organisation is willing to take to undertake business activities and achieve the business objectives, where Conduct Risk is concerned this has to include good customer outcomes. A simple question to ask the board of members could be “What amount of reported mismanagement or public uproar would make you uncomfortable if it appeared in the business newspapers?”
Consolidate the various risk exposures from the risk department's identified risks and present them to the board. Finally, assess whether the company’s internal perception and rhetoric on risk philosophy and appetite are consistent with the board and other stakeholder's viewpoints. Realign the two where required to prepare the annual strategy.
Build Your Framework.
A practical approach to defining indicators within an integrated ERM Framework
Workshop Overview
Many organisations have made considerable progress in the area of enterprise and operational risk management since the financial crisis in 2007/2008. However events over the last few years have demonstrated, and continue to demonstrate the need to make improvements in organisational risk management capabilities and tools.
One area of weakness and, particular challenge for many organisations is around indictors, specifically developing and managing with Key Risk indicators (KRIs). KRIs have a vital role to play in monitoring and managing risk exposure within any organisation, and should be developed and deployed in the context of a wider indicator suite which includes Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Key Control Indicators (KCIs).
Workshop Objective
This interactive workshop provided attendees with a deep understanding of developing and managing with Key Risk Indicators. We started by providing an overarching management framework which integrated strategy execution and risk management. We then moved on to clarify the role of KRIs, alongside KPIs and KCIs.
Using a combination of presentations and practical examples, we were able to:
Learn how to define robust suite of indicators, including the different between Leading and Lagging, and Financial and Non-Financial indicators
Understand how to use a well-structured risk definition to guide the definition of KRIs
Understand the relationship between risk appetite and KRIs, and however Risk Appetite should influence the definition of KRIs
Understand the role KRIs play in scenario analysis
Understand the role of KRIs in the risk assessment process
Understand the role of KRIs within the risk, regulatory and management reporting
Who Attended:
CROs, Directors, General Managers, Senior Management and Managers of: Operations, Operational Risk Management, Enterprise Risk Management, Internal Audit, Compliance, Operational Risk, Strategy and Performance.
Please contact andrew.smart@stratexsystems.com for more details about the presentation or to have a talk about our software solutions.
Risk management is an integral part of business management. This set of principles was developed by the industry for the industry. They have been drafted to make them so practical that they will resonate with any financial organization.
Why should RA & Fraud Managers rethink the way they manage their business?cVidya Networks
In Digicel's 7th Annual International Business Forum 2013 in Panama, Ms. Efrat Nissimov, cVidya's Director of Product Management, presented “Managing Revenue Risks"
Reducing regulatory capital by instigating risk management system and operati...Compliance Consultant
After assessing the risk management operation of a FTSE 100 company we soon identified that Operational Risk Management needed augmenting on their global risk framework. After 10 months work the savings were reflected in the reduction of regulatory capital requirements of over 18% (almost £100M).
Forms of Business
and Conflicts of Interest
Forms of Business
and Conflicts of Interest
Management–shareholder Conflicts
Director–shareholder conflicts
CG AND FIRM PERFORMANCE
Bank’s Hierarchy
Conduct Risk. Assessing risk and identifying cultural drivers for clear defin...Compliance Consultant
Conduct Risk is sweeping the financial services world and catching many risk manager out as there is still a lack of understanding.
Our Compliance Manual is available at http://bit.ly/ComplianceManualTemplate
Risk management need to determine the corporate risk philosophy and appetite. To assess or understand the risk philosophy, try to comprehend the organisation's culture, values and environment. The way business operations are conducted on a daily basis and the organisation’s strategy are typically good indicators where you can find the company risk philosophy. Assess whether business has an aggressive, innovative, typical or conservative attitude towards risks for achieving business goals.
Risk appetite is simply the amount of risk which the organisation is willing to take to undertake business activities and achieve the business objectives, where Conduct Risk is concerned this has to include good customer outcomes. A simple question to ask the board of members could be “What amount of reported mismanagement or public uproar would make you uncomfortable if it appeared in the business newspapers?”
Consolidate the various risk exposures from the risk department's identified risks and present them to the board. Finally, assess whether the company’s internal perception and rhetoric on risk philosophy and appetite are consistent with the board and other stakeholder's viewpoints. Realign the two where required to prepare the annual strategy.
Build Your Framework.
A practical approach to defining indicators within an integrated ERM Framework
Workshop Overview
Many organisations have made considerable progress in the area of enterprise and operational risk management since the financial crisis in 2007/2008. However events over the last few years have demonstrated, and continue to demonstrate the need to make improvements in organisational risk management capabilities and tools.
One area of weakness and, particular challenge for many organisations is around indictors, specifically developing and managing with Key Risk indicators (KRIs). KRIs have a vital role to play in monitoring and managing risk exposure within any organisation, and should be developed and deployed in the context of a wider indicator suite which includes Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Key Control Indicators (KCIs).
Workshop Objective
This interactive workshop provided attendees with a deep understanding of developing and managing with Key Risk Indicators. We started by providing an overarching management framework which integrated strategy execution and risk management. We then moved on to clarify the role of KRIs, alongside KPIs and KCIs.
Using a combination of presentations and practical examples, we were able to:
Learn how to define robust suite of indicators, including the different between Leading and Lagging, and Financial and Non-Financial indicators
Understand how to use a well-structured risk definition to guide the definition of KRIs
Understand the relationship between risk appetite and KRIs, and however Risk Appetite should influence the definition of KRIs
Understand the role KRIs play in scenario analysis
Understand the role of KRIs in the risk assessment process
Understand the role of KRIs within the risk, regulatory and management reporting
Who Attended:
CROs, Directors, General Managers, Senior Management and Managers of: Operations, Operational Risk Management, Enterprise Risk Management, Internal Audit, Compliance, Operational Risk, Strategy and Performance.
Please contact andrew.smart@stratexsystems.com for more details about the presentation or to have a talk about our software solutions.
Risk management is an integral part of business management. This set of principles was developed by the industry for the industry. They have been drafted to make them so practical that they will resonate with any financial organization.
Why should RA & Fraud Managers rethink the way they manage their business?cVidya Networks
In Digicel's 7th Annual International Business Forum 2013 in Panama, Ms. Efrat Nissimov, cVidya's Director of Product Management, presented “Managing Revenue Risks"
Reducing regulatory capital by instigating risk management system and operati...Compliance Consultant
After assessing the risk management operation of a FTSE 100 company we soon identified that Operational Risk Management needed augmenting on their global risk framework. After 10 months work the savings were reflected in the reduction of regulatory capital requirements of over 18% (almost £100M).
Forms of Business
and Conflicts of Interest
Forms of Business
and Conflicts of Interest
Management–shareholder Conflicts
Director–shareholder conflicts
CG AND FIRM PERFORMANCE
Bank’s Hierarchy
Bending the bank: Next steps when stress testing calls for changeLibby Bierman
Like information, impact does not flow in just one direction. After you stress a portfolio or look at a future growth model under stressed conditions, you should go back to your risk appetite framework to assess what changes your institution is not only willing to make but also is capable of handling in light of the projected potential loss and volatility.
In this webinar, Jay Gallo, partner at RMPI Consulting, discussed what to look for in stress test results, key components of your risk appetite framework, and best practices for implementing changes appropriately.
Dear students get fully solved assignments
Send your semester & Specialization name to our mail id :
“ help.mbaassignments@gmail.com ”
or
Call us at : 08263069601
Aligning strategy decisions with risk appetite
Presented by David Shearer
Monday 10th October 2016
APM North West branch and Risk SIG conference
Alderley Park, Cheshire
20 Best Employment Opportunities For Online & Distance Management Graduates.pdfAmitAinapure1
Gaining a management degree expands your career options and greatly improves your chances of finding a stable, well-paying employment. This advantage is available for both whether you obtained your degree on-campus or chosen an Online MBA program.
Any candidate (or degree holder, for that matter) may be curious about the potential employment opportunities associated with a management degree. The top 20 employment opportunities for management graduates are as follows:
Similar to Setting Conduct Risk Appetite. Assessing risk and identifying cultural drivers for clear definitions of your firm's conduct risk appetite (20)
Social Media, or website, one of the biggest questions people always ask is, to get onto Google page 1, or to get a good google ranking, what is the ideal length of things online. As things vary from URLs to blog posts, podacasts to videos the only answer is quite simply everything online should be long enough to convey the message and no longer. Social media posts are awash with way too much information and websites go overboard with cramming too much in, making for poor SEO and bad experiences, therefore not converting. Too much and it looks cheap. Too little and it doesn't raise interest. More details are at http://letstalksocialmedia.co
Most Employees Consider Their Private And Work Lives To Be Totally Separate, But Social Media and Social Networking Has Silently And Effectively Bridged That Gap And Blurred That Distinction.
No matter how “separate” a person’s social accounts may seem to be, there will ultimately be someone, somewhere that will link-up that person to your organisation or firm.
Social Media Policy Template http://wp.me/p4RKCt-5P
Risk Mitigation, when applied properly and effectively, will keep the likelihood of a S166 Skilled Person's Report ever being issued against your firm. Yet so often we see reports in "Final Notices" from the FCA that people risk and compliance managers didn't "understand" or "appreciate" the levels of risk they were courting, or they failed to properly notify the board of the issues and tried to stick their heads in the sand. A S166 is a costly business, and not only in the money charged by the Skilled Person, but also in management time, resources, staff liaison and assistance, printing, extra committee meetings, the list goes on.
Then there comes the Risk Mitigation Programme (RMP) that the regulator creates for the firm, a bespoke program to get things right. This, if not managed properly (and they often are not) can result in changes forced into the business but not understood by anyone; no culture change, and things reverting to normal within months after the completion.
To manage a S166 or RMP requires a project manager that fully understands not only the process, but also the inferences and interpretation of the regulators statements - to act on the spirit as well as the letter, and advise you accordingly.
Alex is a Compliance Director who has a number of issues. He finds an affordable, professional and discrete answer to his regulatory problems with a niche consultant, Compliance Consultant (tel 020 7097 1434)
The UK Regulators (FCA/PRA) are introducing a revised Senior Manager's Regime, taking over from the existing Approved Person's regime in June 2015. This gives you a high level overview and next steps to take to ensure your firm is ready.
Operational risk and risk management across multi-jurisdictions for internati...Compliance Consultant
A multi-jurisdictional banking group needed their Operational Risk Framework (designed by their parent company) to be rolled out and training given n risk reporting.
Increasing your chances of success by engaging with a niche consultancyCompliance Consultant
Fortunately, there are more positive alternatives to using a smaller consultancy compared to the Accentures, McKinseys or the big accountancy firms like Deloitte, E&Y etc. We not only consider that size doesn’t matter, but large size can actually be a disadvantage in meeting your needs.
The FSA published CP12/2 in January 2012setting out some of its proposals for changes to the considerable and substantive content of the Listing Rules; Prospectus Rules; and Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules which it identified as being necessary for change to ensure that the operational effectiveness of the Listing Regime is maintained. The changes sought to ensure that the Rules properly reflect recent changes in contemporary market practices and so would allow the UK Listing Authority (UKLA) to continue to meet its objectives.
This consultation paper raised some wider issues concerning the nature of the premium listing standard and undertook, dependant upon responses, consideration to developing specific options or proposals for discussion in a further paper.
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) issue Final Notices whenever they have disciplined or censured a firm or individual for whatever reason.
In November 2012 the FSA imposed a £10.5 million fine on Card Protection Plan Limited (CPP) for the mis-selling of insurance products.
Whilst the details are interesting and obviously relevant to the company’s either ignorance or arrogance, the end result was due to a failure of the FSA Principles, a list of 11 time forged values that firms, even today still breach fairly consistently, and always at their cost.
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) issue Final Notices whenever they have disciplined or censured a firm or individual for whatever reason.
The Principles are;
Integrity: A firm must conduct its business with integrity.
Skill, care and diligence: A firm must conduct its business with due skill, care and diligence.
Management and control: A firm must take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk management systems.
Financial prudence: A firm must maintain adequate financial resources.
Market conduct: A firm must observe proper standards of market conduct.
Customers' interest: A firm must pay due regard to the interests of its customers and treat them fairly.
Communications with clients: A firm must pay due regard to the information needs of its clients, and communicate information to them in a way which is clear, fair and not misleading.
Conflicts of interest: A firm must manage conflicts of interest fairly, both between itself and its customers and between a customer and another client.
Customers: relationships of trust: A firm must take reasonable care to ensure the suitability of its advice and discretionary decisions for any customer who is entitled to rely upon its judgment.
Clients' assets: A firm must arrange adequate protection for clients' assets when it is responsible for them.
Relations with regulators: A firm must deal with its regulators in an open and cooperative way, and must disclose to the FSA appropriately anything relating to the firm of which the FSA would reasonably expect notice.
The cost of complying with the regulations may seem expensive
and some even see it as a lost cost,
however, if you fail to run your business compliantly due to ignorance, arrogance or some other reason be it personal, cultural or even political;
make sure you have plenty of spare cash in your savings account.
Cp1230 FSA consultation paper summary: complaints against the regulatorsCompliance Consultant
This will be of interest to all firms and individuals that will come under the new UK regulators as regulated, registered or authorised.
Background
The FSA are currently required to make arrangements for the “investigation of complaints arising in connection with the exercise of, or failure to exercise, any of its functions (other than its legislative functions)” under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA).
The latest version of the Financial Services Bill requires the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and the Bank of England to establish how they will investigate complaints against themselves.
The Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority (FSA) jointly published a 34-page Consultation Paper (CP) 12/30 entitled ‘Complaints against the regulators – (The Bank of England, Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority)’, on 6 November 2012.
UCIS is an acronym for Unregulated Collective Investment Schemes and the term unregulated can lead to confusion with inexperienced investment advisers as well as clients.
Many perfectly normal and commonly understood Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) are sold to investors throughout the UK. These CIS are regulated and are authorised by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) or they may also be non-UK CIS that are recognised by the FSA. The official term of recognition enables overseas CIS to be marketed to the public in the UK and the FSA will only recognise an overseas scheme if certain specified criteria are met.
CIS are a type of pooled investment. This is an arrangement that enables a number of investors to 'pool' their assets and have these managed by an independent professional, such as a fund manager who will reduce risk by investing the pooled money in one or more types of asset. Most investment ‘funds’ are collective investment schemes.
Investments are often in gilts, bonds and quoted equities, but depending on the type of scheme can go further, such as into unquoted shares or property.
UK Financial Services are regularly visited by the FSA. The visit will include random interviews with fairly deep questions asked that, when taken as a whole, if they don't add up, will require further regulatory scrutiny.
We help companies prepare for these visits and explain what the FSA are looking for, how best to respond and how to keep up your end in a very intimidating process.
CEI Compliance is the UK's fastest growing regulatory consultancy and provides associate opportunities to consultants and cost effective value to financial services and other regulated companies.
CEI Compliance is the UK's fastest growing risk & regulatory consultancy and provides associate opportunities to consultants and cost effective value to financial services and other regulated companies.
For Professional Services Firms the rules of strategy setting are different. Without knowing the differences instantly sets your firm into a dilemma and causes untold damage to turnover and growth as well as individual partner/director career development.
UK Financial Services advertising rules for regulated firms can be a challenge. In this paper we discuss the use of social media and the traps to be aware of, making sure the rules are covered.
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to radically reinvent the way we do business. This study explores how CEOs and top decision makers around the world are responding to the transformative potential of AI.
The case study discusses the potential of drone delivery and the challenges that need to be addressed before it becomes widespread.
Key takeaways:
Drone delivery is in its early stages: Amazon's trial in the UK demonstrates the potential for faster deliveries, but it's still limited by regulations and technology.
Regulations are a major hurdle: Safety concerns around drone collisions with airplanes and people have led to restrictions on flight height and location.
Other challenges exist: Who will use drone delivery the most? Is it cost-effective compared to traditional delivery trucks?
Discussion questions:
Managerial challenges: Integrating drones requires planning for new infrastructure, training staff, and navigating regulations. There are also marketing and recruitment considerations specific to this technology.
External forces vary by country: Regulations, consumer acceptance, and infrastructure all differ between countries.
Demographics matter: Younger generations might be more receptive to drone delivery, while older populations might have concerns.
Stakeholders for Amazon: Customers, regulators, aviation authorities, and competitors are all stakeholders. Regulators likely hold the greatest influence as they determine the feasibility of drone delivery.
Senior Project and Engineering Leader Jim Smith.pdfJim Smith
I am a Project and Engineering Leader with extensive experience as a Business Operations Leader, Technical Project Manager, Engineering Manager and Operations Experience for Domestic and International companies such as Electrolux, Carrier, and Deutz. I have developed new products using Stage Gate development/MS Project/JIRA, for the pro-duction of Medical Equipment, Large Commercial Refrigeration Systems, Appliances, HVAC, and Diesel engines.
My experience includes:
Managed customized engineered refrigeration system projects with high voltage power panels from quote to ship, coordinating actions between electrical engineering, mechanical design and application engineering, purchasing, production, test, quality assurance and field installation. Managed projects $25k to $1M per project; 4-8 per month. (Hussmann refrigeration)
Successfully developed the $15-20M yearly corporate capital strategy for manufacturing, with the Executive Team and key stakeholders. Created project scope and specifications, business case, ROI, managed project plans with key personnel for nine consumer product manufacturing and distribution sites; to support the company’s strategic sales plan.
Over 15 years of experience managing and developing cost improvement projects with key Stakeholders, site Manufacturing Engineers, Mechanical Engineers, Maintenance, and facility support personnel to optimize pro-duction operations, safety, EHS, and new product development. (BioLab, Deutz, Caire)
Experience working as a Technical Manager developing new products with chemical engineers and packaging engineers to enhance and reduce the cost of retail products. I have led the activities of multiple engineering groups with diverse backgrounds.
Great experience managing the product development of products which utilize complex electrical controls, high voltage power panels, product testing, and commissioning.
Created project scope, business case, ROI for multiple capital projects to support electrotechnical assembly and CPG goods. Identified project cost, risk, success criteria, and performed equipment qualifications. (Carrier, Electrolux, Biolab, Price, Hussmann)
Created detailed projects plans using MS Project, Gant charts in excel, and updated new product development in Jira for stakeholders and project team members including critical path.
Great knowledge of ISO9001, NFPA, OSHA regulations.
User level knowledge of MRP/SAP, MS Project, Powerpoint, Visio, Mastercontrol, JIRA, Power BI and Tableau.
I appreciate your consideration, and look forward to discussing this role with you, and how I can lead your company’s growth and profitability. I can be contacted via LinkedIn via phone or E Mail.
Jim Smith
678-993-7195
jimsmith30024@gmail.com
The Team Member and Guest Experience - Lead and Take Care of your restaurant team. They are the people closest to and delivering Hospitality to your paying Guests!
Make the call, and we can assist you.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...CIOWomenMagazine
This person is none other than Oprah Winfrey, a highly influential figure whose impact extends beyond television. This article will delve into the remarkable life and lasting legacy of Oprah. Her story serves as a reminder of the importance of perseverance, compassion, and firm determination.
2. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Many people struggle with the concept of
Conduct Risk Appetite, assuming it to be a hard
and fast figure that they will be censured if they
do not keep below it.
However, without risk, there is usually no
reward.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
3. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Risk appetite is risk jargon that is best explored by
asking the question, "How much capital are you are
willing to risk to achieve your strategic goals?“
Conduct Risk appetite is how much capital are you
are willing to risk to try and achieve your forecasted
profit, or what are you willing to do to achieve your
objectives considering good customer outcomes.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
4. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Statements of Risk Appetite
Risk is measured typically by the likelihood and
consequence (normally single point entry) and
mapped onto some form of heat map.
While risk criteria in this form can be valuable
expressions of risk appetite, members of your staff
who were not directly involved in the discussions that
formulated them are not specifically aware of all of
the measured thinking that goes on behind them.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
5. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Providing clear definition or commentary on
each category and level of risk so that the
cumulative effect can be seen to impact the
core corporate objectives will;
better communicate your message to all
employees precisely what constitutes
acceptable operational behaviour; and
a clear link can be seen with the outcomes for
customers and how they are also maintained.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
6. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Completing Your Risk Statement
Initially, a risk statement is actually a
conversation involving the risk owner along with
stakeholders which may have or should have an
interest in the risk.
It's also a record of your analysis, a guideline for
initial and continuing risk reporting and a to-do-list
for the risk owner to watch.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
7. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
When your risk statement fulfils its role as a
good conversation between risk owner and
stakeholders, each stakeholder will need to have
a specific appreciation of your position
concerning the Conduct Risk .
That does not mean they have to concur with it,
however, they will have enough information to
have meaningful interaction with you and judge
by themselves if and when they consider your
analysis or if perhaps they may wish to
recommend changes.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
8. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Your clear articulation of any risk should be with
regard to a specific objective and be made up of
a range of sources of risk taken to no more than
two levels below the objective.
Level 2 and level 3 Conduct Risk descriptions
provide sufficient granularity for effective
design of controls.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
9. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
In fact the achievement of the higher level objective
may be at higher risk, or may require many controls
to be designed and embedded, …
… therefore the third level of risks (the actual failure
of performance or process) is needed to get a clearer
picture of what is driving the high risk.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
10. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
This serves to help identifying the inherent controls
to be designed or addressed within the process or
the performance indicators needed to form risk
indicators that alert senior management to breaches
of Conduct Risk .
In the realm of risk it therefore follows that you can
capture a strategic Conduct Risk profile for an
organisation in 5 to 9 risk statements (specific risks)
since most organisations ordinarily have around 4 to 6
main objectives.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
11. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Then you may need to add some specific “Conduct
Risk ” objectives for instance one for complaint
handling or product design governance in the event
the organisation does not have a separate objective
for it already or it is not sufficiently captured in a
broader objective.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
12. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Example of Product Design Risk Events (descriptions/definitions) and Customer Outcomes or
Objectives.
Level 1 Risk Category may be “Retail Products” and the Level 2 Risk definition might be “The risk
that our products and services (including contracts & T&Cs) are not designed, developed and
operated to deliver fair and compliant customer outcomes.”
Risk Category – Level 3
Risk Event Customer Outcomes or Objectives
Definition
The risk that we fail to
implement adequate
systems and controls in
relation to product
governance, design &
Pricing
Design
The target market is not clearly defined
Products are not designed to meet an identified
customer need.
Product features are not suitable for the target
market.
Associated risks and complexity of a product against
the financial capability of each group of customers
are not identified and mitigated.
Product design is complex and difficult for
customers in the target marker to understand.
Product design does not meet regulatory
expectations.
Products are not stress-tested to identify how it
might perform in a range of market environments
and how the customer could be affected.
All business stakeholders are engaged to ensure the
requirements of people, processes and systems to deliver
new products are assessed.
All business stakeholders are engaged to ensure clear
communication of the product, its features, intended markets
and potential risks.
We provide adequate training to our staff
We regularly review and identify the different and likely
needs of our customer groups.
We design product features to ensure they are suitable to
the target customer market
We research and stress-test the product or service to
identify how it might perform in a range of conditions.
We consider the wider environment that may affect products
or customers.
Customers are updated on product features, benefits and
performance over a product’s lifetime.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
13. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
LeeWerrell Chartered FCSI FISMM
Owner – Compliance Consultant
◦ Lee has been involved in risk & compliance work for; Inter-dealer
Brokers, Retail Banks, Investment Banks, Stockbrokers, Building
Societies other Distribution channels.
◦Much of our business at Compliance Consultant is conducted
under NDAs as it involves remedial and corrective work.
◦ Lee was appointed a Skilled Person in 2012 by the FSA.
Call us on 020 7097 1434
14. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Conduct Risk – How to Establish Risk Appetite
Lee Werrell Chartered FCSI FISMM
Owner of Compliance Consultant
Contact me on 020 7097 1434
info@complianceconsultant.org
15. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
•Why Not Buy Your
•Compliance Manual
•From Us …. Many Firms Have.
•http://bit.ly/ComplianceManualTemplate
Call us on 020 7097 1434
16. Conduct Risk
How To Establish Risk Appetite
Thank You For Your Time
Lee Werrell Chartered FCSI FISMM
Contact me on 020 7097 1434
info@complianceconsultant.org
uk.linkedin.com/in/leewerrell
facebook.com/ComplianceConsultant
@complianceconst @s166reports