Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...
Health Equity Workshop - Case Study
1. Sharing your passion for health equity:
Building our collective understanding
April 9, 2013
Charlottetown, PEI
2. Case Study
• Problem-base learning
• Presentation: Description of the context, issues
addressed, activities undertaken
• Group work: Think critically about the
information presented – analyze, synthesize, and
consider solutions
One of four developed for a workshop hosted by NCCDH and the Canadian
Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Institute of Population and Public
Health in Toronto, ON Feb 14-15, 2012
3. MAKING THE CASE FOR HEALTH
EQUITY INTERNALLY: WINNIPEG’S
EXPERIENCE
Developed by: Dr. Sande Harlos and Horst Backé
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority
4. Setting the Stage: Health Disparity in
Winnipeg
Reducing Gaps in Health Report 2008-
Large gaps seen in Winnipeg lowest vs highest SES:
• Asthma in children – 3.0 time (PC 1.6)
• Injuries in children – 2.5 times (PC 1.2)
• Injuries all ages - 2.2 times (PC 1.4)
• Unintentional falls – 1.8 times (PC 1.3)
• Land transport accidents – 1.9 times (PC 1.3)
• Diabetes – 3.7 times (PC 2.4)
• Substance-related disorders – 5.0 times (PC 3.4)
PC = Pan-Canadian comparison
5. Health Disparity in Winnipeg
They had…
•Local, timely data as a focal point
•Anticipation of media attention
•Collaboration between Research & Evaluation
Unit and Population and Public Health Team
•Appealed to key members of regional
leadership’s existing paradigms and alliances
6. The Issue/Challenge
The Challenge:
How could the Winnipeg Regional Health
Authority Population and Public Health
Program increase awareness and stimulate the
change required to promote health equity?
7. The Environment
• Within WRHA: An internal oversight committee
formed to explore multifaceted action to promote
health equity
• Beyond WRHA: Increased participation of the
Winnipeg Poverty Reduction Council (WPRC) and
other partners to support efforts of others to
address root causes
• Within the City of Winnipeg, an increasing critical
mass to address poverty seemed to be forming
8. The Key Players
WRHA Promoting Health Equity Oversight
Committee
Working Groups:
1. Partnership (ongoing)
2. Planning (ongoing)
3. Directional (time limited working group)
– Describing the problem task team
– Best practices task team
– Communications task team
9. WRHA Health Equity Groups
PLANNING
Working Group
PARTNERSHIP
Working Group
DIRECTIONAL
Working Group
PROMOTING HEALTH EQUITY OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
DESCRIBING THE
PROBLEM
Task team
COMMUNICATIONS
Task team
BEST PRACTICES
Task team
10. Sources of Planning Information
• Environmental scan and gap analysis of
existing or potential partners
• Data and indicators to describe health
inequity
• Grey literature review: key recommendations
to promote health equity
• Program budgeting and service trends
11. Group Work
(10 minutes)
Imagine you work in this health authority and
you wanted to support this initiative…
• Who would you convince in your workplace
that this is an important issue? How would you
persuade them to take action?
• Who else do you think should be involved?
And how would you engage them?
12. Challenges
Developing common ownership
“How do we go from health equity being a
concept that people support, to an issue that
they ‘own’? We need to develop a shared
identity within the health region that says,
‘Equity is what we are all about.’”
13. Challenges
Finding the evidence, expertise and
resources
“At this stage, we work on an ad hoc basis –
collaborating on various committees and on specific
research projects. It would facilitate a more strategic
sharing of plans if there were more developed
linkages between research institutions and the
health region.”
(Academic)
14. Challenges
Maintaining leadership and motivation
“Ideally, there will be many champions for this
initiative among senior leadership. I am
guessing that public health will still be the
driving force, but would like to see other
leaders emerge to take a significant lead in
their areas of practice and influence.”
15. Challenges
Competing budgets and resource allocation
“It will take real creativity and courage to shift
resources towards preventative work. How do you
lobby for health equity promotion funding that
will reduce needs for health care services later…
when there are sick people right now?”
“Funding health disparity work will contribute
hugely to a sustainable health care system, but
it’s very hard to do in the short term.”
16. Challenges
Determining roles
“I have been involved in equity issues for my
entire career. When I was first invited to
participate in this internal committee with a
lot of high-level people, I was concerned that
there would be a lot of talk and little action.”
(Community organizer)
17. Challenges
Determining Roles
“Within public health, we need to pay attention to
actions that might be in conflict with other levels of
government. Can we advocate for what we think is
needed? Can we even create a public place for this
discussion? Staff are still unsure about their role in
advocacy…. More clarity and capacity building is
needed. “ (Staff member)
18. Challenges
Establishing priorities
“We have a list of over 1000 recommendations from
other equity reports. Even once we distil them to
unique themes, that’s still far too many for a health
authority to address. We need to create a broad
enough plan to appeal to lots of stakeholder, but an
actionable plan for the health authority. My biggest
fear is that we take on too much.”
19. Group Work
(10 minutes)
How would you overcome these
challenges? Where would you start?
•Develop common ownership
•Find the evidence, expertise and resources required
•Maintain leadership and motivation
•Set doable priorities
20. Strengths
• A region-wide committee leading efforts
• Multiple sectors involved at the working level
(working groups, task teams)
• Endorsement and involvement of senior
WHRA management
• Well-established relationships in the
community and with researchers
21. Outcomes to Date
• Regional Health Plan proposals are being evaluated with
health equity as a criterion
• Population and Public Health strategic plans are being
developed around the concept of ‘targeted universality’
• Further refinement of public health resource allocation (on
basis of community need, not population) are being
considered
• A conceptual framework has been proposed
• Mapping discussions are underway
• WHRA Health Equity report is currently being drafted
10 minutes opening presentation 10 minutes in small groups5 minutes for plenary – we will ask for each group to report back their best idea/suggestion10 minutes presentation about challenges10 minutes small group work5 minutes for plenary10 minutes – wrap up and summary of what happened
When Winnipeg agreed to do their case study they were admittedly a bit hesitate. So when they presented this case study in Toronto last year they very much talked about it being a “work in progress” – something we can all understand as we move through our daily work and activities
Sources of research All Working Groups and Task Teams are actively gathering research to inform their actions, including:An environmental scan and gap analysis of organizations most actively involved in poverty-related health equity work in the community and at the regional, provincial, national and international levels. To date, over 100 existing partners have been identified. (Partnership WG) Indicators to describe health inequity in the health region, with candidates being researched through a review of 14 local reports to determine the immediate availability of data (and associated gaps) specific to these indicators. Reports reviewed include community health assessments, reports of the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (University of Manitoba), as well as population and disease-specific reports. (Describing the Problem Task Team)Key recommendations to promote health equity, found by reviewing over 80 resource documents or websites. Over 1000 recommendations have been gleaned through this review. (Best Practices Task Team)Program budgeting and marginal analysis process where equity was one of twelve criteria used to assess new initiatives (Planning Working Group) – was a new planning frame used by the regional health authority. (the planning process has benefits)
Maintaining leadership and ongoing motivation within the entire health region – While public health is leading the process, ongoing leadership is required for the initiative. There is already formal and informal leadership structures throughout the health region, and if an issue like equity doesn’t take hold within those in positions of influence to change the tone, direction and priorities of a system, then any one area (like public health) will have very little impact on organisational practices and culture. Keeping people motivated needs to consider why people may be interested and what people get out of being involved. Feeling like you are part of something important, meaningful and successful is key.“Ideally, there will be many champions for this initiative among senior leadership. I am guessing that public health will still be the driving force, but would like to see other leaders emerge to take a significant lead in their areas of practice and influence.”
Establishing priorities – “We have a list of over 1000 recommendations. If only one-quarter are unique, that’s still far too many to address. We need to create an actionable plan for the health authority, and I’m really not sure how we will prioritize the recommendations. My biggest fear is that we take on too much.” If overwhelmed you might do nothing well.
Strengths:A region-wide committee leading effortsAll sectors involved at the working level (working groups, task teams)Endorsement and involvement of senior WHRA managementWell-established relationships in the community and with researchers
If there is time…We welcome any thoughts or feedback.