The Green Line project in Aguascalientes, Mexico aimed to regenerate a 15 km stretch of degraded urban land. The project constructed green spaces, cultural facilities, sports facilities, and roads. It was implemented in three stages from 2011-2013, impacting over 300,000 residents. The project led to a 50% reduction in crime, savings in transportation costs, and increased social cohesion. However, questions remain regarding the sustainability of maintaining the green spaces and high costs of upkeep.
Escort Service Call Girls In Shakti Nagar, 99530°56974 Delhi NCR
Green Line Aguascalientes - Urban safety
1. THE GREEN LINE
COMPREHENSIVE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Aguascalientes, Mexico
URBAN SAFETY I – Mundus Urbano
Prof. Dr. Peter Gotsch
Presented by:
Wilbert Aguilar
Edith De Los Santoshttp://www.lja.mx/2014/07/el-predio-revocado-no-pertenecia-al-complejo-linea-verde/
2. • Introduction to Aguascalientes, Mexico
• The Green Line
Background and Initiative Goals
Urban region
Project Description
Construction process
Innovations, obstacles and solutions
• Economical Aspects
• Results
• Conclusions
OUTLINE
3. MEXICO
• 120 million Inhabitants. (45.5 % Poverty)
• Social issues: Crime, Violence, Narcotraffic,
Corruption
• Intentional homicide rate: 25 place (World
Ranking)
• Corruption: 105 place (World Ranking)
• From 2006 to 2012: More than135,000 deaths,
(116,000 linked to narcotraffic)
• From 2007 to 2013: More than 26,000 missing.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Aguascalientes_in_Mexico_(zoom).svg/1280px-
Aguascalientes_in_Mexico_(zoom).svg.png
7. INICIATIVE GOALS
VISSION
To provide a new urban landmark of 15 kilometers long of public infrastructures
spaces. This would lead to enhance the communities and the improvement the quality
of life of more than 300 thousand inhabitants of the poorest and deprived areas in
the city.
OBJECTIVES
- To contribute to the governance and integration of the poorest area in the city.
- To promote the appropriation of the public space for enhancing the social fabric
among the residents of this area.
- To achieve a sustainable environment and financially viable project in the long
term.
- To enhance the self-community management among residents to guarantee the
continuity of the project based on a feasible working agenda in the project.
- To improve the health of people thorough physical activation on proper public
spaces.
- To decrease the percent of criminal behavior
http://elclarinete.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/linea-verde.jpg
8. Main Region “Cumbres” and “Ojoscalientes”
90 urban colonies / 300,000 people
PEMEX Company
Municipal Planning Institute Aguascalientes
City Council of Aguascalientes
The town hall of Aguascalientes
URBAN REGIONS
http://www.guangzhouaward.org/644/content_739.html
9. file:///C:/Users/Edith%20the%20Cat/Downloads/Caso-Linea-Verde-Version-final-Martin-Torres.pdf
19 Zones
Urban Landmark: 12 Kilometers long / 60 hectares
Pipeline space of PEMEX & Waste dumps and rubble
6 Main Components
-Green spaces (60He/5.000 trees)
-Cultural and educational spaces (arts spaces, library)
-Sportive spaces (Cycle routes, 10Pparks, gym)
-Recreational spaces (plazas, parks, rest, terrace, auditorium)
-Hydraulic infrastructures (4 Water treatment plant, irrigation)
-Road Infrastructures
9/12km constructed by 2013
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
10. The timelines keep correspondence with the use of public
annual resources, given the characteristics of the local
government budget.
Consists of three stages between 2011-2013:
1st Stage,
southern sector (6 km). Estimated a direct impact of
140,000 people. Around 12 neighborhood
2nd Stage,
central sector (3 km). Around 7 neighborhood. Estimated a
direct impact that reached more than 100 thousand
inhabitants.
3rd Stage,
northern sector (3 km). Comprises a surface that has not
yet urbanized and the four sectors of the Fractionation
Villas. Estimated a direct impact that reached more than
60,000 inhabitants. (Unfinished by 2014)
CONSTRUCTION PROCESS
13. http://crisolplural.com/wp-content/uploads/cache/64118_NpAdvHover.jpg
First time in Mexico that the national oil company (PEMEX) allows any organization to build
something on their restricted areas.
Second, it is revolutionary in Mexico in implementing pocket parks in such a long perimeter in a
way to provide similar quality to each segment of the project in terms of the facilities
provided.
Third, a water pipeline was built along the project that uses treated water from nearby treatment
water plants; this way, in a city with tremendous water problems, to maintain such a large area
will be a low -cost task as this is distributed by gravity along the project.
Forth, as a comprehensive project, the innovation reaches different aspects from planning, urban,
social, environmental, cultural, and leisure among others.
The Linea Verde was inspired from other similar initiatives in South America, particularly in
Colombia and Brazil (the Mayors Martinez visited these countries)
Obstacles and Solutions
- Water issues (
- High budget issues (founding's)
INNOVATION FOR THE INITIATIVE
14. ECONOMICAL ASPECTS
• Cost of the project: 500 million Mexican Pesos –or more than
38 million US dollars.
• The resources came from The Federal Government throughout
their ministries by funding parts of the project; the State
Government by donating some plots along the Linea Verde to
the Municipal Government. Private: different companies
helping to fund small aspects of the project.
• 80 percent of the project cost was covered by Federal
Government. Only US$7 million came out of city funds.
• It was created a US$400,000 trust fund to continue running
the park and its programs, and to handle future donations.
STAKEHOLDERS
• Municipal Government
• Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT)
• National Commission for Physical Culture and Sport (CONADE)
• Urban Spaces Regeneration Program (PREP)
• HÁBITAT
• National Council for Culture and the Arts (CONACULTA)
• National Water Comission (CONAGUA)
• Secretariat of Communications and Transportation (SCT)
15. RESULTS
The municipal government (Ayuntamiento de Aguascalientes 2011-2013, 2012) reported that for 2012, some results and lessons
learnt derived from the implementation of Line Green are:
• 50% decrease of the rate of criminal behavior in the area of influence (surveillance, the use and appropriation of
public space by citizens, traders and institutions public) providing better conditions for urban security: a safe public
space is a place of community life.
• More than 300 million of savings in transportation for families
• 25% Increase of goodwill of 12,000 people
• Positive effect of the physical urban improvement intervention of spaces (Lighting, visibility, cleaning, enabling
equipment for various uses, including others), with the participation and social interventions of the inhabitants and
neighbors (allow this initiative generates responsibility and ownership of public space and thereby enhances social
cohesion.
• For the realization of Urban successful intervention, it has been necessary develop a joint action, where there is not
only a government will and institutional, but also, have established intervention programs and entertainment social, to
achieve adequate levels of participation and commitment of the people with the project and its sustainability.
• Make this country a safer space habitable, it has been necessary, enlist the implementation of diversity workshops,
according to the interests and need.
• Successes in terms of the application of resources and program operation. Considered a government priority, in the sense
of coordinate the efforts of the various municipal offices towards the same goal.
• The insertion of the “Convive Feliz” into all the media, campaigns, advertising and letterheads resources of the
government, local agencies and all that go public physical or virtual path, as by the Internet.
• Recognized at local and international level that it has placed in the focus of certain groups of experts and
organizations public who claim to partially replicate the experience.
16. CONCLUSION
SUCCESFUL:
• Capacity of the authorities to obtain funds from different
investors to build the project.
• Regeneration of the area.
• Social involvement (Activities)
QUESTIONABLE:
• Benefits rates come from Government sources (Possible inaccurate
data)
• Not sustainable. Water needed for green areas.
• High Maintenance cost.
• Increase of 25% of value of the houses next to he park >
Gentrification