Maggie Bennington-Davis MD
The Neurobiology of Kindness
Care that is grounded in and directed by a
thorough understanding of the neurological,
biological, psychological and social effects of
trauma and violence on humans and is informed by
knowledge of the prevalence of these experiences in
persons who receive mental health services.
(NASMHPD, 2004)
4
Effects of experience on the brain
Depend on:
 Single vs. repeated experience
 Age when experiences occurred
or began
 Agent – natural vs. human
 Nature of the experience –
accidental vs. purposeful
 Environmental supports
 Innate resilience
 Practice!
A responsive environment will
 Facilitate physiologic calm
 Avoid triggering the
fight/flight/freeze
response
 Encourage thinking,
problem-solving, decision-
making, flexibility
 KEEP EVERYONE SAFE
 These things apply to both
staff and those they are
serving
Neurobiology of Exposure to
Trauma and Violence
Neurobiology
of Thinking
What have we used the brain for?
100,000 years:
Homo Sapiens
Hunter/Gatherer
5,000 years:
Recorded history
Building civilization
250 years:
“Modern” civilization
Prefrontal Cortex (Thinking Part)
 Newest brain region in human development
 Thin outermost layer, behind your forehead
 4-5% of total brain mass
 Sets goals, plans ahead
 Controls impulses
 Solves complex problems
 Visualizes situations/images - creativity
 Helps with focus
 Can be strengthened (take your brain to the gym)
Here’s How the Brain Develops
 The brain needs safe experiences to live.
 It grows,
is “pruned”
and learns
 It forms
connectomes
50 trillion 1000 trillion 500 trillion
Here’s how it works and breaks:
Life and coping can affect
genes
“What's wrong with you?"
TO
“What happened to you?”
Change the question from…
The people we serve
 Have tremendous exposure to events (trauma)
especially as children
 that cause a wash of threat detection all the time
Those of us who serve them
 Have created ways of thinking about and perceiving
the people we serve and their behaviors and our
environments
 These patterns of thinking sometimes get in our way
 We must begin with ourselves!
The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study
(ACES)
 Largest study ever done examining effects of
adverse childhood experiences over one’s lifespan
(>17,000 people)
 Majority were >50 yo, white, and attended college
 Original study done in California
 www.acestudy.org
ACES Categories
 Recurrent physical abuse
 Recurrent emotional abuse
 Contact sexual abuse
 An alcohol and/or drug abuser in the
household
 An incarcerated household member
 Someone who is chronically depressed,
mentally ill, institutionalized, or suicidal
 Mother is treated violently
 One or no parents
 Emotional or physical neglect
ACES Results
Abuse:
 Emotional 10%
 Physical 26%
 Sexual 21%
Neglect:
 Emotional 15%
 Physical 10%
 Two-thirds had at least one ACE
 ACEs tend to occur in clumps
Household Dysfunction
 Mother treated
violently 13%
 Mental illness 20%
 Substance abuse 28%
 Parental separation or
 divorce 24%
 Household member
 imprisoned 6%
ACES Deadly Outcomes
 ACEs influence the likelihood of the 10 most common
causes of death in the U.S.
 With an ACE score of “0”, the majority of adults have
few, often none, of the risk factors for these diseases
 With an ACE score of 4 or more, the majority of adults
have multiple risk factors for these diseases or the
diseases themselves
Positive, linear correlation between ACEs
and health problems
 Smoking
 COPD
 Hepatitis
 Cardiac disease
 Diabetes
 Fractures
 Obesity
 Alcoholism
 Other substance abuse
 Depression
 Attempted suicide
 Teen pregnancy and teen
paternity
 Sexually transmitted
diseases
 Occupational health
 Poor job performance
Health
problems
# ACEs
Positive, linear correlation between ACEs
and Alcoholism
 High ACE score
predicts alcohol
abuse
 Higher yet
in people whose
parents abused
alcohol
 Self-perpetuating cycle
over generations
 The presence of alcohol
abuse in the family
increases the likelihood
of sexual and physical
abuse
Alcohol abuse &
dependence
# ACEs
Positive, linear correlation between ACEs
and suicide
 Depression affects
19 million Americans
 <25% have access to
treatment
 Depression is the leading
cause of disability in the
US
 Depression is the 4th
leading contributor to
“global burden of disease”;
by 2020, it will be the 2nd
leading contributor
 ACE score of 7
correlated with 51
fold increase in suicide
attempts in children and
adolescents
 ACE score of 7 correlated
with 30 fold increase in
suicide attempts in
adults
 Presence of emotional
abuse in the home is the
strongest correlate with
later depression
Suicide
# ACEs
Epinephrine (adrenalin)
Cortisol
Beta-endorphins
Hypervigilance
Action, not thought
Cognitive diminishment
Increased aggression
Loss of impulse control
Speechless terror
Stress Response to RECURRENT
THREAT
 Reset CNS: the hallmark is
HYPERVIGILANCE
 Brain awash in cortisol
 Traumatic re-enactment
 Aggression become chronic
 Dissociation is common
 Chronic hyperarousal interferes with cognitive clarity
 Loss of (or failure to develop) affect modulation
 Injury or inhibition of prefrontal cortex and
hippocampus Bloom, 2001
HYPERVIGILANCE…
 Changes the way you view the world – literally and
neurologically
Hypervigilance is an
enhanced state of sensory
sensitivity accompanied by
an exaggerated intensity of
behaviors whose purpose is
to detect threats.
Emotional Brain
(Restak, 1988)
Between Stimulus and Response
S Stimulus
Sensory Thalamus
(LeDoux, 1996)
Between Stimulus and Response
S Stimulus
Sensory Thalamus Amygdala
Very Fast
(LeDoux, 1996)
Your Brain Decides
 Your brain decides what it is going to do before the
signal gets to the “thinking” part of your brain
 Once you do become aware of what you are about to
do… you have very little time to change the impulse
 Your prefrontal cortex is responsible for impulse
control… “Cognitive Wedge”
 Impulse control furthermore requires language…
which becomes important later on, so hold that
thought!
Between Stimulus and Response
S Stimulus
Sensory Thalamus Amygdala
Cortex
Very Fast
SlowerHippocampus
Response
(LeDoux, 1996)
Once you are in threat status…
 The prefrontal cortex bows out quickly – and blood
flow and hormones make sure that it does (“thinking
can kill you”)
 Then you are in the hands of your limbic system:
amygdala, hippocampus, cingulate gyrus, orbital
frontal cortex, and insula: these then drive your
behavior
 The limbic system wants you to MOVE – away from
the threat and TOWARD safety (but mostly AWAY)
Threat
 Easily triggered (what triggers you…?)
 Diverts brain energy to the limbic system
 Activity at this point becomes primitive (F/F/F)
 Difficult in this moment to be self-aware
 Very likely in this moment to interpret things as
dangerous or bad – you will not take risks
 Hypervigilance is the poster child for
misinterpretation
 Constant threat causes allostatic load, and you
experience a chronic sense of threat and a lower
threshold for additional threat
Between Stimulus and Response
S Stimulus
Sensory Thalamus AmygdalaVery Fast
SlowerHippocampus
Response
Cortex
(LeDoux,
1996)
Between Stimulus and Response
S Stimulus
Sensory Thalamus AmygdalaVery Fast
Slower
Response
Cortex
Hippocampus
(LeDoux,
1996)
Play
In Panksepp JP (1998): Affective Neuroscience: The Foundation of Human and
Animal Emotions,
Oxford, New York
Play and Fear
In Panksepp JP (1998): Affective Neuroscience: The Foundation of Human and Animal Emotions,
Oxford, New York
Between Stimulus and Response
S Stimulus
Sensory Thalamus AmygdalaVery Fast
Slower
Response
Cortex
Hippocampus
Neuroregulatory
Intervention
Cognitive engagement
Psychopharmacology
Social /
Environmental
Intervention
(LeDoux,
1996)
What we see
 Disengagement
 Aggression and loss of impulse control in the face
of novel situations
 Immediate deterioration into power and control
struggles
 Aggression and fear in the context
of rule enforcement
 “Minor” events precipitating
catastrophic reactions
Cognitive Wedge: making the most
before emotions set in
Trigger Response
cognitive wedge
social/
environmental neuroregulatory
Intervention intervention
Taking your brain to the gym
Increase blood flow & use of the “thinking” brain
Strengthen pathways to the neocortex
Decrease reliance on the “primitive” brain
Hard wire new “habits”
Change predictions in novel situations
Working out the Brain – How?
Mindfulness and Meditation
Cognitive enhancement therapies
Cognitive behavioral therapies
Cognitive exercises
Physical exercises and body
movement
What works for YOU?
Changing gears a little…
 Physiologic changes during F/F/F…
 Increased heart rate
 Increased BP
 Increased respiration
 Do you run because you are afraid or are you afraid
because you run… (Kohut)
Stress Research from Jerusalem
 Ariah Shalev at Hadassah Medical School
 Survivors of suicide bombers
 Following ER treatment
 Those that do not develop stress symptoms are able
to decrease heart rate, calm, quiet their bodies
 Those that do develop stress symptoms still have
hyperarousal, high heart rates, high blood pressure
 Regulated states appear to be correlated with
decreased likelihood to develop stress
syndromes
How do you “center”
yourself?  Deep breath
 Notice internal
signals
 Think positive
thoughts
 Pay close attention to
the present
 Be aware of your own
experience as it
occurs
 Find your cognitive
wedge…
Goals of Treatment
•Maintain Regulating State; notice
the present
•Prevent Re-experiencing States:
stay in the thinking brain
•Use strategies to employ the
cognitive wedge
Saxe, 2001
Do you believe in Recovery?
 People will live up to your expectations
 Situations will unfold according to your expectations
 Your brain is very invested in your predictions coming
true – so you will do things unconsciously to ensure
that happens
Language and Vocabulary
claims
denies
refuses
noncompliant
alleges
failed
Physical Environments
 Have an impact on attitude, mood, and behavior
 Physical environment is the program as much as groups,
routines, and therapy
 Its manipulation by skilled staff becomes an essential
aspect of the educational process
 Strong link between physiologic state, emotional state, and
the physical environment
 Natural environment promotes increased dopamine, faster
healing, and less pain in surgical patients
 ACES have less impact if child is in natural environment
 Kids with ADD are more relaxed and focused in “green”
environments
Color matters (UBC, 2009) (Drunk Tank Pink – 1970s)
Creativity
Attention to
detail
What does YOUR environment say?
Triggers for violent events in mental health
treatment settings
 Enforcement of agency rules
 Perception of unfair treatment
 Waiting
 Anger about past experience in mental health
system
 Controlling, restrictive environment
 Shame and humiliation
 Crowding
 Boredom
Alternatives to Coercion
 Choices (choice relax the threat alarm)
 Prediction/routine (information and no surprises)
 Navigators with lived experience
 Individual Safety Plans
 Triggers
 Early Warning signs
 Strategies
 Preferences
 Practice!
Lived Experience – Been There,
Done That
 Learning from those who
have been through the
system
 System navigators
 Role models
 Glimpse of what could be
 Hope!
Coercion… overt and covert
Microaggressions
 Visible or audible keys on staff
 Rules, rules, rules
 Strip searches
 Directive staff language
 Taking personal property
 Privileges
 Invasive security checks and level checks
 Demanding explanations
 Insisting on participation
 Asking intimate questions without context of
relationship
On Stage:
Treating each other well
 How staff treat each other is not a secret
 How staff treat each other has an impact on those they
serve
 How staff treat each other sets the cultural norm
 Respect is contagious
Parallel Process
 Collective disturbance
 We do unto others as is done to us
 Coercion is infectious
 So is respect
 Response to organizational trauma
 Hypervigilance
 Easily triggered
 Sense of community
 Cultural norms
 Deep democracy: having a voice
SAFE!
Control
Respect
Influence
Information
Reassurance
Inclusion
Hopefulness
Celebration and Support:
Engagement of staff members
 Discover small victories
 Public recognition
 Celebrate milestones
 Set people free to be creative
 Leaders accountable for challenges
 Promote interactions among staff
 Staff credited with successes
 Create a culture of giving
Five Squirrels
 Donald Geisler 2005. “Meaning from Media: the Power
of Organizational Culture”. Organization
Development Journal 23 (1): 81-83.
Suggestions for further
reading
 www.sanctuaryweb.com (Sandra Bloom’s website)
 “Creating Sanctuary”, “Destroying Sanctuary”, and “Restoring
Sanctuary” by Sandra Bloom
 “Restraint and Seclusion: the Model for Elimination of their Use in
Healthcare”
 Murphy and Bennington-Davis
 “The boy who was raised as a dog” & “Born for Love”
 Bruce Perry & Maia Szalavitz
 “Trauma systems theory”
 Glenn Saxe
 Anything by Bessel Van der Kolk
 SAMHSA website “trauma informed care”
 “Your Brain At Work” – David Rock

The Neurobiology of Kindness- Presented at the May 2013 PGS Conference

  • 1.
    Maggie Bennington-Davis MD TheNeurobiology of Kindness
  • 3.
    Care that isgrounded in and directed by a thorough understanding of the neurological, biological, psychological and social effects of trauma and violence on humans and is informed by knowledge of the prevalence of these experiences in persons who receive mental health services. (NASMHPD, 2004)
  • 4.
    4 Effects of experienceon the brain Depend on:  Single vs. repeated experience  Age when experiences occurred or began  Agent – natural vs. human  Nature of the experience – accidental vs. purposeful  Environmental supports  Innate resilience  Practice!
  • 5.
    A responsive environmentwill  Facilitate physiologic calm  Avoid triggering the fight/flight/freeze response  Encourage thinking, problem-solving, decision- making, flexibility  KEEP EVERYONE SAFE  These things apply to both staff and those they are serving
  • 6.
    Neurobiology of Exposureto Trauma and Violence Neurobiology of Thinking
  • 7.
    What have weused the brain for? 100,000 years: Homo Sapiens Hunter/Gatherer 5,000 years: Recorded history Building civilization 250 years: “Modern” civilization
  • 8.
    Prefrontal Cortex (ThinkingPart)  Newest brain region in human development  Thin outermost layer, behind your forehead  4-5% of total brain mass  Sets goals, plans ahead  Controls impulses  Solves complex problems  Visualizes situations/images - creativity  Helps with focus  Can be strengthened (take your brain to the gym)
  • 9.
    Here’s How theBrain Develops  The brain needs safe experiences to live.  It grows, is “pruned” and learns  It forms connectomes 50 trillion 1000 trillion 500 trillion
  • 10.
    Here’s how itworks and breaks:
  • 11.
    Life and copingcan affect genes
  • 12.
    “What's wrong withyou?" TO “What happened to you?” Change the question from…
  • 13.
    The people weserve  Have tremendous exposure to events (trauma) especially as children  that cause a wash of threat detection all the time Those of us who serve them  Have created ways of thinking about and perceiving the people we serve and their behaviors and our environments  These patterns of thinking sometimes get in our way  We must begin with ourselves!
  • 15.
    The Adverse ChildhoodExperiences Study (ACES)  Largest study ever done examining effects of adverse childhood experiences over one’s lifespan (>17,000 people)  Majority were >50 yo, white, and attended college  Original study done in California  www.acestudy.org
  • 16.
    ACES Categories  Recurrentphysical abuse  Recurrent emotional abuse  Contact sexual abuse  An alcohol and/or drug abuser in the household  An incarcerated household member  Someone who is chronically depressed, mentally ill, institutionalized, or suicidal  Mother is treated violently  One or no parents  Emotional or physical neglect
  • 17.
    ACES Results Abuse:  Emotional10%  Physical 26%  Sexual 21% Neglect:  Emotional 15%  Physical 10%  Two-thirds had at least one ACE  ACEs tend to occur in clumps Household Dysfunction  Mother treated violently 13%  Mental illness 20%  Substance abuse 28%  Parental separation or  divorce 24%  Household member  imprisoned 6%
  • 18.
    ACES Deadly Outcomes ACEs influence the likelihood of the 10 most common causes of death in the U.S.  With an ACE score of “0”, the majority of adults have few, often none, of the risk factors for these diseases  With an ACE score of 4 or more, the majority of adults have multiple risk factors for these diseases or the diseases themselves
  • 19.
    Positive, linear correlationbetween ACEs and health problems  Smoking  COPD  Hepatitis  Cardiac disease  Diabetes  Fractures  Obesity  Alcoholism  Other substance abuse  Depression  Attempted suicide  Teen pregnancy and teen paternity  Sexually transmitted diseases  Occupational health  Poor job performance Health problems # ACEs
  • 20.
    Positive, linear correlationbetween ACEs and Alcoholism  High ACE score predicts alcohol abuse  Higher yet in people whose parents abused alcohol  Self-perpetuating cycle over generations  The presence of alcohol abuse in the family increases the likelihood of sexual and physical abuse Alcohol abuse & dependence # ACEs
  • 21.
    Positive, linear correlationbetween ACEs and suicide  Depression affects 19 million Americans  <25% have access to treatment  Depression is the leading cause of disability in the US  Depression is the 4th leading contributor to “global burden of disease”; by 2020, it will be the 2nd leading contributor  ACE score of 7 correlated with 51 fold increase in suicide attempts in children and adolescents  ACE score of 7 correlated with 30 fold increase in suicide attempts in adults  Presence of emotional abuse in the home is the strongest correlate with later depression Suicide # ACEs
  • 23.
    Epinephrine (adrenalin) Cortisol Beta-endorphins Hypervigilance Action, notthought Cognitive diminishment Increased aggression Loss of impulse control Speechless terror
  • 24.
    Stress Response toRECURRENT THREAT  Reset CNS: the hallmark is HYPERVIGILANCE  Brain awash in cortisol  Traumatic re-enactment  Aggression become chronic  Dissociation is common  Chronic hyperarousal interferes with cognitive clarity  Loss of (or failure to develop) affect modulation  Injury or inhibition of prefrontal cortex and hippocampus Bloom, 2001
  • 25.
    HYPERVIGILANCE…  Changes theway you view the world – literally and neurologically Hypervigilance is an enhanced state of sensory sensitivity accompanied by an exaggerated intensity of behaviors whose purpose is to detect threats.
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Between Stimulus andResponse S Stimulus Sensory Thalamus (LeDoux, 1996)
  • 28.
    Between Stimulus andResponse S Stimulus Sensory Thalamus Amygdala Very Fast (LeDoux, 1996)
  • 29.
    Your Brain Decides Your brain decides what it is going to do before the signal gets to the “thinking” part of your brain  Once you do become aware of what you are about to do… you have very little time to change the impulse  Your prefrontal cortex is responsible for impulse control… “Cognitive Wedge”  Impulse control furthermore requires language… which becomes important later on, so hold that thought!
  • 30.
    Between Stimulus andResponse S Stimulus Sensory Thalamus Amygdala Cortex Very Fast SlowerHippocampus Response (LeDoux, 1996)
  • 31.
    Once you arein threat status…  The prefrontal cortex bows out quickly – and blood flow and hormones make sure that it does (“thinking can kill you”)  Then you are in the hands of your limbic system: amygdala, hippocampus, cingulate gyrus, orbital frontal cortex, and insula: these then drive your behavior  The limbic system wants you to MOVE – away from the threat and TOWARD safety (but mostly AWAY)
  • 32.
    Threat  Easily triggered(what triggers you…?)  Diverts brain energy to the limbic system  Activity at this point becomes primitive (F/F/F)  Difficult in this moment to be self-aware  Very likely in this moment to interpret things as dangerous or bad – you will not take risks  Hypervigilance is the poster child for misinterpretation  Constant threat causes allostatic load, and you experience a chronic sense of threat and a lower threshold for additional threat
  • 33.
    Between Stimulus andResponse S Stimulus Sensory Thalamus AmygdalaVery Fast SlowerHippocampus Response Cortex (LeDoux, 1996)
  • 34.
    Between Stimulus andResponse S Stimulus Sensory Thalamus AmygdalaVery Fast Slower Response Cortex Hippocampus (LeDoux, 1996)
  • 35.
    Play In Panksepp JP(1998): Affective Neuroscience: The Foundation of Human and Animal Emotions, Oxford, New York
  • 36.
    Play and Fear InPanksepp JP (1998): Affective Neuroscience: The Foundation of Human and Animal Emotions, Oxford, New York
  • 37.
    Between Stimulus andResponse S Stimulus Sensory Thalamus AmygdalaVery Fast Slower Response Cortex Hippocampus Neuroregulatory Intervention Cognitive engagement Psychopharmacology Social / Environmental Intervention (LeDoux, 1996)
  • 38.
    What we see Disengagement  Aggression and loss of impulse control in the face of novel situations  Immediate deterioration into power and control struggles  Aggression and fear in the context of rule enforcement  “Minor” events precipitating catastrophic reactions
  • 39.
    Cognitive Wedge: makingthe most before emotions set in Trigger Response cognitive wedge social/ environmental neuroregulatory Intervention intervention
  • 40.
    Taking your brainto the gym Increase blood flow & use of the “thinking” brain Strengthen pathways to the neocortex Decrease reliance on the “primitive” brain Hard wire new “habits” Change predictions in novel situations
  • 41.
    Working out theBrain – How? Mindfulness and Meditation Cognitive enhancement therapies Cognitive behavioral therapies Cognitive exercises Physical exercises and body movement What works for YOU?
  • 42.
    Changing gears alittle…  Physiologic changes during F/F/F…  Increased heart rate  Increased BP  Increased respiration  Do you run because you are afraid or are you afraid because you run… (Kohut)
  • 43.
    Stress Research fromJerusalem  Ariah Shalev at Hadassah Medical School  Survivors of suicide bombers  Following ER treatment  Those that do not develop stress symptoms are able to decrease heart rate, calm, quiet their bodies  Those that do develop stress symptoms still have hyperarousal, high heart rates, high blood pressure  Regulated states appear to be correlated with decreased likelihood to develop stress syndromes
  • 44.
    How do you“center” yourself?  Deep breath  Notice internal signals  Think positive thoughts  Pay close attention to the present  Be aware of your own experience as it occurs  Find your cognitive wedge…
  • 45.
    Goals of Treatment •MaintainRegulating State; notice the present •Prevent Re-experiencing States: stay in the thinking brain •Use strategies to employ the cognitive wedge Saxe, 2001
  • 46.
    Do you believein Recovery?  People will live up to your expectations  Situations will unfold according to your expectations  Your brain is very invested in your predictions coming true – so you will do things unconsciously to ensure that happens
  • 47.
  • 48.
    Physical Environments  Havean impact on attitude, mood, and behavior  Physical environment is the program as much as groups, routines, and therapy  Its manipulation by skilled staff becomes an essential aspect of the educational process  Strong link between physiologic state, emotional state, and the physical environment  Natural environment promotes increased dopamine, faster healing, and less pain in surgical patients  ACES have less impact if child is in natural environment  Kids with ADD are more relaxed and focused in “green” environments
  • 49.
    Color matters (UBC,2009) (Drunk Tank Pink – 1970s) Creativity Attention to detail
  • 50.
    What does YOURenvironment say?
  • 51.
    Triggers for violentevents in mental health treatment settings  Enforcement of agency rules  Perception of unfair treatment  Waiting  Anger about past experience in mental health system  Controlling, restrictive environment  Shame and humiliation  Crowding  Boredom
  • 52.
    Alternatives to Coercion Choices (choice relax the threat alarm)  Prediction/routine (information and no surprises)  Navigators with lived experience  Individual Safety Plans  Triggers  Early Warning signs  Strategies  Preferences  Practice!
  • 53.
    Lived Experience –Been There, Done That  Learning from those who have been through the system  System navigators  Role models  Glimpse of what could be  Hope!
  • 54.
    Coercion… overt andcovert Microaggressions  Visible or audible keys on staff  Rules, rules, rules  Strip searches  Directive staff language  Taking personal property  Privileges  Invasive security checks and level checks  Demanding explanations  Insisting on participation  Asking intimate questions without context of relationship
  • 55.
    On Stage: Treating eachother well  How staff treat each other is not a secret  How staff treat each other has an impact on those they serve  How staff treat each other sets the cultural norm  Respect is contagious
  • 56.
    Parallel Process  Collectivedisturbance  We do unto others as is done to us  Coercion is infectious  So is respect  Response to organizational trauma  Hypervigilance  Easily triggered  Sense of community  Cultural norms  Deep democracy: having a voice
  • 57.
  • 58.
    Celebration and Support: Engagementof staff members  Discover small victories  Public recognition  Celebrate milestones  Set people free to be creative  Leaders accountable for challenges  Promote interactions among staff  Staff credited with successes  Create a culture of giving
  • 59.
    Five Squirrels  DonaldGeisler 2005. “Meaning from Media: the Power of Organizational Culture”. Organization Development Journal 23 (1): 81-83.
  • 60.
    Suggestions for further reading www.sanctuaryweb.com (Sandra Bloom’s website)  “Creating Sanctuary”, “Destroying Sanctuary”, and “Restoring Sanctuary” by Sandra Bloom  “Restraint and Seclusion: the Model for Elimination of their Use in Healthcare”  Murphy and Bennington-Davis  “The boy who was raised as a dog” & “Born for Love”  Bruce Perry & Maia Szalavitz  “Trauma systems theory”  Glenn Saxe  Anything by Bessel Van der Kolk  SAMHSA website “trauma informed care”  “Your Brain At Work” – David Rock