STUDENTS ARE SPEAKING UP ABOUT SPEAKING OUT.
Today’s high schoolers are more supportive of First Amendment rights than at any time during the past decade, while adults are more likely to say the First Amendment
“goes too far.”
Surveyed students overwhelmingly wanted freedom from government
surveillance and tracking by business, although they were less
certain when terrorism was evoked.
The Role of Human Relationship in Moving People to Action: The Messenger and ...Knight Foundation
What role do messenger identity and personalization play in engaging people and moving them to take action in the civic context?
Does a request from a real person on behalf of a civic organization more effectively move people to engage and take an action than one made by the organization?
Mobile News Notifications: A Two-wave Experiment with Smartphone UsersKnight Foundation
With the proliferation of smartphones and the ability to send
mobile news notifications …
• Do notifications have an economic benefit for newsrooms? Do they drive traffic to the news app or to the news site?
• Do notifications have a democratic benefit? Do they inform the public or simply provide information that could have been learned elsewhere?
Mary will discuss the Pew Internet Project’s latest research on Americans’ use of social media, including how different demographic groups use various platforms. She’ll also present findings from a recent report looking at the phenomenon of “Facebook fatigue,” and help us to understand how usage patterns might be shifting in the future.
This presentation highlights how today’s changing information ecology, specifically the increasing use of social media and mobile technologies, has altered the way consumers access and interact with news and information.
Research Specialist Aaron Smith recently was part of a panel at RTIP discussing how people actually use social media and ways in which the racing industry can use it to their advantage.
The Role of Human Relationship in Moving People to Action: The Messenger and ...Knight Foundation
What role do messenger identity and personalization play in engaging people and moving them to take action in the civic context?
Does a request from a real person on behalf of a civic organization more effectively move people to engage and take an action than one made by the organization?
Mobile News Notifications: A Two-wave Experiment with Smartphone UsersKnight Foundation
With the proliferation of smartphones and the ability to send
mobile news notifications …
• Do notifications have an economic benefit for newsrooms? Do they drive traffic to the news app or to the news site?
• Do notifications have a democratic benefit? Do they inform the public or simply provide information that could have been learned elsewhere?
Mary will discuss the Pew Internet Project’s latest research on Americans’ use of social media, including how different demographic groups use various platforms. She’ll also present findings from a recent report looking at the phenomenon of “Facebook fatigue,” and help us to understand how usage patterns might be shifting in the future.
This presentation highlights how today’s changing information ecology, specifically the increasing use of social media and mobile technologies, has altered the way consumers access and interact with news and information.
Research Specialist Aaron Smith recently was part of a panel at RTIP discussing how people actually use social media and ways in which the racing industry can use it to their advantage.
Lee Rainie will discuss networked information and the different ways users receive, process, create, and share it. He will describe the ways in which the new media ecosystem has affected the way people learn things and make decisions. And he will share Pew Internet findings about where major media organizations fit into the ecosystem for their audiences.
New Media Institute for beginner users at the U.S. Conference on AIDS in San Francisco on October 29, 2009. Facilitated by AIDS.gov's Michelle Samplin-Salgado and Miguel Gomez.
How today’s changing information ecology, specifically the increasing use of social media and mobile technologies, has altered the way consumers access and interact with news and information. Read more: pewinternet.org
Kristen Purcell presents the latest Pew Internet findings on participatory and mobile news consumption, and the level of public interest in religious and spiritual news and information. More: pewinternet.org
Lee Rainie, director of internet, science and technology research at the Pew Research Center, will discuss the rise of the Internet of Things and how all the data it creates will enrich the picture we have about what is happening in communities and media. He will look at the variety of media zones that people occupy and some of the ways they can be measured.
Lee Rainie, Director, Internet, Science and Technology from the Pew Research Center to delivered a keynote address at WAN-IFRA’s first World Media Policy Forum. Rainie is one of the world’s top academic researchers on the internet and the social changes triggered by information and communication technologies (ICT.) He talked about what research is showing us about privacy strategies and statistics.
Presentation by Miguel Gomez about Youth and New media given at the 9/21/10 amfAR Congressional Briefing, "HIV/AIDS and Youth: Moving Toward an HIV-Free Generation"
Presentation for the Maine Digital Government Summit on how digital technologies and the social web are impacting the government landscape and advancing Open Government directives.
Research associate Kathryn Zickuhr discussed the Pew Research Center’s latest data on older adults and technology at JASA’s Seminar on Advocacy and Volunteering in New Landscapes in New York, NY.
Future of the First Amendment. 2011 Survey of High School Students and Teache...Retelur Marketing
The Knight Foundation ha publicado el informe:"Future of the First Amendment" en el que analiza el uso de los jóvenes estadounidenses de los medios sociales y su contribucción en la libertad de expresión y al apoyo de la Primera Enmienda. Por lo que se desprende que los medios de comunicación social son buenos para la democracia. (Inglés)
Lee Rainie will discuss networked information and the different ways users receive, process, create, and share it. He will describe the ways in which the new media ecosystem has affected the way people learn things and make decisions. And he will share Pew Internet findings about where major media organizations fit into the ecosystem for their audiences.
New Media Institute for beginner users at the U.S. Conference on AIDS in San Francisco on October 29, 2009. Facilitated by AIDS.gov's Michelle Samplin-Salgado and Miguel Gomez.
How today’s changing information ecology, specifically the increasing use of social media and mobile technologies, has altered the way consumers access and interact with news and information. Read more: pewinternet.org
Kristen Purcell presents the latest Pew Internet findings on participatory and mobile news consumption, and the level of public interest in religious and spiritual news and information. More: pewinternet.org
Lee Rainie, director of internet, science and technology research at the Pew Research Center, will discuss the rise of the Internet of Things and how all the data it creates will enrich the picture we have about what is happening in communities and media. He will look at the variety of media zones that people occupy and some of the ways they can be measured.
Lee Rainie, Director, Internet, Science and Technology from the Pew Research Center to delivered a keynote address at WAN-IFRA’s first World Media Policy Forum. Rainie is one of the world’s top academic researchers on the internet and the social changes triggered by information and communication technologies (ICT.) He talked about what research is showing us about privacy strategies and statistics.
Presentation by Miguel Gomez about Youth and New media given at the 9/21/10 amfAR Congressional Briefing, "HIV/AIDS and Youth: Moving Toward an HIV-Free Generation"
Presentation for the Maine Digital Government Summit on how digital technologies and the social web are impacting the government landscape and advancing Open Government directives.
Research associate Kathryn Zickuhr discussed the Pew Research Center’s latest data on older adults and technology at JASA’s Seminar on Advocacy and Volunteering in New Landscapes in New York, NY.
Future of the First Amendment. 2011 Survey of High School Students and Teache...Retelur Marketing
The Knight Foundation ha publicado el informe:"Future of the First Amendment" en el que analiza el uso de los jóvenes estadounidenses de los medios sociales y su contribucción en la libertad de expresión y al apoyo de la Primera Enmienda. Por lo que se desprende que los medios de comunicación social son buenos para la democracia. (Inglés)
Fundamental rights the first amendment (v.2)universalfun
Discusion de las 5 libertades fundamentales de la primera enmienda de la constitucion de los Estados Unidos. Discussion of the five fundamental freedoms of the first amendment to the US Constitution
The Philippine Bill of Rights: Civil Rightsbrianbelen
Lecture slides for an undergraduate class on Philippine Politics and Governance I taught between 2003 and 2005.
This is the first of two slides dealing with the Bill of Rights enshrined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution. The slides specifically cover civil rights.
These slides were prepared using Powerpoint XP.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://brianbelen.blogspot.com
http://brianbelen.wordpress.com
The English Restoration and the Glorious RevolutionTom Richey
This is a follow-up to my lecture on Stuart Absolutism and the English Civil War, beginning with the Restoration of Charles II and ending with the Glorious Revolution and the English Bill of Rights. The Restoration monarchs (Charles II and James II) each had an uneasy relationship with Parliament. James II had an especially hard time as a Catholic monarch ruling a Protestant nation. In 1688, James' son-in-law, William of Orange, invaded England upon the invitation of Parliament and overthrew James. William and Mary signed the English Bill of Rights, bringing in a new era of cooperation between the Crown and Parliament.
Online help with essay writing for everybody at EssayHelp.io. Help with essay writing - College Homework Help and Online Tutoring.. How Online Essay Writing services boost your Grades | Write Assignment. How to Get Essay Help Online - Women Daily Magazine. No.1 Essay Writing Helper in Australia By the Experts. Essay Writing Help | Essay Writers | My Online Assignment Help. Getting Essay Help. Essay Writing Help for Students by Experts. 24+ Helpful Essay Writing Websites Most Popular - Aress. Top Quality Essay Assignment Help Online Essay Writing Help. Buy Online Essays, Need Help Writing An Essay, Essay Custom. Essay writing help online - College Homework Help and Online Tutoring.. Essay Writing Help Online, Assignment Help Online, Write An Essay, Es…. Free Essay Writing Help Online - Genius Updates. 7 Critical Tips for When You Buy an Essay Online - Attention Trust. Simple Guide to Help You Write an Essay by BreeAndrea - Issuu. Custom Essay Writing Help Online | Essay writing help, Essay writing .... Help with writing an essay - College Homework Help and Online Tutoring.. Essay writing help guideline for students seeking success at school.. College essay help online | Order Custom Essays at littlechums.com.. Get help in your essay writing and other assignments from the experts .... Essay Writing Help, English Essay Writing Assignment Help, Write an E…. Writing help online. Online essay writing tutoring. essay help online - Paperown.com. Business Essay Help Online - YouTube. Write Essay Free Online / How to Write a Remarkable Essay Infographic .... Essay Writing Help By UK Professional. Online Essay Writing Services, Professional Online Essay Writing Help. Online Writing Help [Video] | Essay writing, Writing services, Essay .... Essay help site! Essay help siteedu. Why should you get online essay writing service help. 10 Tips to Write an Essay and Actually Enjoy It. Free essay writing help, Essay Writing Help for Students by Experts. Step-By-Step Guide to Essay Writing - ESL Buzz. Online College Essay Help Essay Online Help
International Forum of Educational Technology & SocietyMid.docxLaticiaGrissomzz
International Forum of Educational Technology & Society
Middle School Students’ Social Media Use
Author(s): Florence Martin, Chuang Wang, Teresa Petty, Weichao Wang and Patti Wilkins
Source: Journal of Educational Technology & Society , Vol. 21, No. 1 (January 2018), pp.
213-224
Published by: International Forum of Educational Technology & Society
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26273881
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26273881?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
International Forum of Educational Technology & Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Journal of Educational Technology & Society
This content downloaded from
������������130.160.24.117 on Mon, 26 Aug 2019 01:28:12 UTC�������������
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26273881
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26273881?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26273881?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
Martin, F., Wang, C., Petty, T., Wang, W., & Wilkins, P. (2018). Middle School Students’ Social Media Use. Educational
Technology & Society, 21 (1), 213–224.
213
ISSN 1436-4522 (online) and 1176-3647 (print). This article of the Journal of Educational Technology & Society is available under Creative Commons CC-BY-ND-NC
3.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). For further queries, please contact Journal Editors at [email protected]
Middle School Students’ Social Media Use
Florence Martin*, Chuang Wang, Teresa Petty, Weichao Wang and Patti Wilkins
University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA // [email protected] //
[email protected] // [email protected] // [email protected] // [email protected]
*Corresponding author
ABSTRACT
Cyber bullying, digital identity, impact of digital footprints, and use of inappropriate social media are topics
that are gaining attention in K-12 schools. As more schools and school districts are implementing 1-1 and
“bring your own technology” initiatives, attention to these topics is becoming increasingly important. A
total of 593 middle school students were surveyed about digital footprints and concerns about social media.
The results show that 17% started using social media at age nine or yo.
BULLYING ORIGINS, PREVENTION, EVOLUTION IN THE LAST DECADE16VannaSchrader3
BULLYING ORIGINS, PREVENTION, EVOLUTION IN THE LAST DECADE 16
Bullying African American Boys and Girls from The Ages 11-14
Miranda Johnson
Voorhees College
Senior Capstone
Dr. Louis Howell
February 27, 2022
Abstract
Bullying is a vice that continues to haunt humanity, especially the youth in our world today. The matter has been aggravated with the emergence of cyberbullying in addition to traditional bullying. This research proposal aims to explore the origin of bullying, its evolution in the last decade, and the interventions necessary to prevent bullying both traditional and over the internet, focusing on African American teens who have experienced bullying. The research designs, including questionnaires and interviews, will be an effective method of collecting data from the participants, including the African American children between the ages of 11 and 14, and a control group that will be used to allow neutrality. The paper aims to present concrete evidence of the topic's legitimacy and its gravity regarding the country's youth to spur the stakeholders to take action to solve the issue.
Background and Rationale
Traditional bullying and cyberbullying are plagues that have been troubling society for a long time since humans’ enacted their natural orientation to form social institutions like schools. It has been especially true for children in middle school of African American descent between the age of 11 and 14. This research proposal aims to investigate how bullying comes to be, how bullying has evolved in the last decade to the bullying that we see today, and how society can prevent bullying, all the while focusing on African American teenagers between the age of 11 and 14 years.
This problem occurs in a wide range of environments, including their neighborhoods in addition to schools. Bullying is every form of physical, social, or verbal aggression committed by a group or person against a certain party (Kennedy, 2020). Bullying negatively impacts its victims by causing a drop in academic performance, potential psychosocial challenges, criminal wrongdoings, increased risks for suicide, perpetration of risky behavior, and suicidal tendencies.
This scourge is a growing concern, especially in the now integrated multicultural society of interracial interaction. Some studies show that African American teenagers can experience an increased rate of peer victimization than their white peers, owing to their subjective outlooks on racial discrimination. Other studies have shown that African American teenagers are less likely to encounter bullying than their white counterparts (Hong, 2021). The studies have been inclusive on this issue. The period of growth of adolescence is marked with the enactment of risky activities that may not display self-discipline. Since the rise of the digital age, bullying has evolved into traditional and cyberbullying. The increase in access to internet resources has been a huge factor in this evolution, in add ...
Running Head EFFECTS OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON THE YOUTHS .docxtodd271
Running Head: EFFECTS OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON THE YOUTHS 1
EFFECTS OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON THE YOUTHS 8
Effects of Social Media on the Youths
Institution
Name
Section One
The fact that social media has become part our daily live cannot be overlooked especially in the current innovations in technology. Access to devices such as smart phones and broadband internet has created an easy way through which any one can access any form of information that they want. Although the social media has played a special role in ensuring that the information that we is at our disposal, it has resulted in serious erosion of human morals and ethics. It is not surprising that people value their phones more than they do to their fellow human. However, this research will look at how the young people have been impacted by the social media.
The current widespread of the social are becoming an area of interest among the researchers especially about how it has affected the community around the world. Almost every individual is connected to at least one social media plat form and this has attracted the researchers to learn more about these platforms and how they have affected the community around. However, the most affected are the teenagers who have become fanatics of these platforms and have made them part of their daily life to an extent they cannot spend a minute without accessing them. This has never implication on their ethics, behavior and even their education.
Social media has both positive and negative implications to the youths and this paper seeks to address these impacts with a special focus on the youths.
The positive impacts is that the youths can interact with one another without meeting physically across the globe and this has enhanced creation of friendship and therefore, strong social ties. Moreover, the youths stay updated on the events that happen around the world at the comfort of their rooms or working places. Also, many youths have made the social media a source of their income and have utilized it to improve their lives through improved connections.
Despite the good aspects connected to the social media, it has the negative side too and this has bad implications on the youths. To begin with, social media reduces face to interactions as they spend most of their time in these online platforms. This isolation result in psychological, emotional mental and physical effects to the youths. The minor are also introduced to immoral behaviors such as homosexuality, lesbianism and other sexual misconducts. Further, the youths are exposed to pornographic content which result in early pregnancies among the young girls and also increase the chance of contracting sexually transmitted infections.
A comprehension of these issues will help the society find ways through which to reduce the youth prevalence to the problems associated with sta.
Commentary CollectionIn this special collection of CommentLynellBull52
Commentary Collection
In this special collection of Commentary
essays, Frederick M. Hess and four
education scholars discuss the pros and
cons for academics who want to wade into
public debate.
Read more from the collection.
COMMENTARY
How (and When) Researchers Should Speak Truth to Power
Four guidelines for academics who want to participate in heated education debates
By Pedro A. Noguera
January 16, 2018
In many respects, the polarization that characterizes the national political climate
has long been present in the debates over the direction of public education,
which took a particularly rancorous turn with the enactment of No Child Left Behind 16 years
ago. Fierce conflicts over the expansion of charter schools, school closures, high-stakes testing,
teacher evaluation, and the merits of the common core have been common in communities
across the country. Unlike the current political debates over immigration, taxes, and healthcare,
which typically pit Republicans against Democrats, the fault lines in these long-running conflicts
over education have frequently put leaders in the Democratic Party against constituencies that
are typically regarded as a stable part of their base, namely teachers' unions and parents and
activists in low-income communities of color.
Not surprisingly, some academics (myself included) have chosen to weigh in on these education
conflicts. Some have participated actively out of a sense of moral obligation because the
research they have done has a direct bearing on the issues under debate. Others have done so
because of their close political or ideological alignment to one side or the other. Most do quickly
learn that becoming embroiled in such heated debates, especially when the stakes are high,
always comes with risks to reputation, and in some cases, even job security.
Having participated in some of these battles over the
years, I have arrived at an understanding about how
and when to intervene in the debate through our
scholarship and writing. Here are criteria that I have
found helpful:
1) Avoid calling upon others to take stands that
you are not taking yourself. For example,
although I have been critical of high-stakes testing
for many years, I have never encouraged parents to
"opt out." I feel that this is a decision that each
parent must make on their own, and while I feel it is
appropriate to explain the merits and drawbacks
associated with high-stakes testing, I draw the line
at telling parents what to do with their children.
2) Only enter conflicts in which you have a
knowledgeable position that can be supported by research. This may seem like an
obvious rule of thumb, but I have seen many scholars drawn into debates where they lack the
expertise to offer well-reasoned positions. Invariably, their reputations are sullied when it turns
out they can't effectively defend a position they have taken.
How (and When) Researchers Should Speak Truth to Power - E... https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2018 ...
Causal Argument Essay
Qualitative Research Summary
Social Learning Theory
Teenage Alcohol Abuse Essay
Essay On Causal Argument
Jeremy Rifkin Enemies Of Promise
Confirmation Bias Essay
Causal Essay
AUSTIN, TEXAS – July 22, 2015 – Twenty-two projects that seek to provide voters with better information and increase their participation before, during and after elections will receive $3.2 million as winners of the Knight News Challenge. The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation made the announcement today at a convening hosted by the Annette Strauss Institute for Civic Life at The University of Texas at Austin’s Moody College of Communication.
more here: http://kng.ht/1gMuLFw
How Knight endowments advance journalism excellenceKnight Foundation
Knight Foundation’s journalism and media innovation team gets much well-deserved attention for its media innovation work. Less discussed, but no less important, is the education of thousands of students and professionals each year through $200 million in endowed programs Knight has built over several decades to advance journalism excellence.
There are dozens of Knight-endowed chair and mid-career training programs. Since most of that work occurs at universities, I’ve also added some context—an analysis of 25 years of Knight’s journalism and media grantmaking to universities. Read more at http://kng.ht/1iiq0jV.
Seven projects that harness the power of data and information for the health of communities will receive more than $2 million as winners of the Knight News Challenge: Health. Knight Foundation made the announcement at the Clinton Health Matters conference in La Quinta, Calif. Find out more at http://kng.ht/1bURt3Q.
February 2014 update: Since publishing our original report in December, 2013, we've received dozens of emails from peers in the budding civic tech community proposing additions. On Feb. 26, we released an updated version of the civic tech investment analysis, which includes an additional 34 companies and $265 million of investment. Find out more at http://kng.ht/1cPi3Ar.
Investments by private capital funders and foundations in technology that spurs citizen engagement, improves cities and makes governments more effective is growing significantly, with more than $430 million going to the field between January 2011 and May 2013, according to a major report released today by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.
The first report of its kind, “The Emergence of Civic Tech: Investments in a Growing Field,” provides an in-depth analysis of the current state of private capital and foundation investments in civic technology. It aims to help organizations and investors better understand civic tech funding, so that they can strengthen their work and help shape the field. The analysis applies a new approach to research and advances the use of data in the social sector; it showcases an interactive data visualization map that allows users to explore investments across multiple areas of civic tech. Find out more at www.knightfoundation.org/features/civictech
Winning projects bring art to South Florida neighborhoodsKnight Foundation
Forty-nine ideas – a blend of art and technology that celebrates South Florida’s uniqueness – received $2.72 million Monday as winners of the Knight Arts Challenge. Together, the 2013 winners will infuse South Florida’s neighborhoods with creativity – with projects taking place from Palm Beach to Miramar, Overtown, Coral Gables and Key West. Find out more at www.knightarts.org. Music credit: Knight Arts Challenge Winner Joey Barstem of meme experi mental ensemble. F
Finding a Foothold: How Nonprofit News Ventures Seek SustainabilityKnight Foundation
A new report offers an in-depth view into the nonprofit news industry, revealing the significant progress that news organizations have made toward sustainability and the challenges they still face. The report, “Finding a Foothold: How Nonprofit News Ventures Seek Sustainability,” provides data and analysis on 18 nonprofit news organizations between 2010 and 2012.
A follow-up to the 2011 Knight study, “Getting Local: How Nonprofit News Ventures Seek Sustainability,” the new report takes a deeper look, expanding the number of nonprofit sites included in the research. It also broadens the focus of the study from just local, to state and national organizations. Find out more at www.knightfoundation.org/features/nonprofitnews.
With a range of thought-provoking, community-driven and whimsical ideas, 56 projects received $2.1 million as winners of the first Detroit Knight Arts Challenge. A program of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the challenge funds the best ideas for engaging and enriching Detroit through the arts. Find out more at www.knightarts.org.
“Six Lessons on Designing Public Prizes for Impact” looks at how foundations can use contests as a powerful tool to advance their work. The report therefore offers a valuable starting point for foundations and other organizations to leverage the benefits of contests.
It outlines Knight Foundation’s history and experiences with hosting challenges across all its program areas—media innovation and journalism, arts and communities. Readers can take advantage of six lessons, along with practical examples and tips, on designing public prizes for impact and running an effective contest. Also included are examples of work with specific grantees.
Find out more at www.knightfoundation.org/opencontests.
More than 80% of nonprofit leaders recently surveyed believe that demonstrating impact through performance measurement is a top priority. Yet for many, evaluation feels like a daunting task that takes up time and resources without providing much value.
If we agree with the importance of measurement, how do we improve our practice of it?
These are questions we often grapple with at Knight Foundation. Above, Knight's Vice President of Strategy and Assessment, Mayur Patel, shares a few simple exercises on how to use evaluation to deliver better programs and promote greater effectiveness within our organizations. Find out more at http://kng.ht/12VJ6Cz.
As social media tools have become ubiquitous, foundations have used them in a variety of ways to expand their networks, gather insights and build new relationships. As a result, there’s a growing interest in developing better ways to measure the impact of their online efforts.
The following slides were presented by Knight Foundation Vice President of Strategy and Assessment, Mayur Patel, at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's recent roundtable on Social Media Measurement. Nearly a dozen foundations, including Knight, gathered with communication experts, evaluators and data analysts to share best practices and learn from one another.
You can read more about Knight's social media strategy online at http://kng.ht/ZmI83c.
Getting funding through the Knight Community Information Challenge: A guide f...Knight Foundation
On May 1, Knight Foundation is launching a contest with a local focus — the Knight Community Information Challenge. While the contest funds all types of news and information projects, the priority of this year’s contest is to fund projects that make “open government” more tangible and useful to people in a specific community—which makes this contest a unique opportunity for anyone wanting to build and test a new idea locally. Find out more at http://kng.ht/ZPwCPd. Please note: The challenge deadline has been extended to July 1, 2013.
Starting May 1, Knight Foundation will again be offering matching funds to community and place-based foundations seeking to make an impact by funding news and information projects. This year, though the Knight Community Information Challenge is evolving. While the challenge will continue to be an open contest for all kinds of media projects, this year we will be offering up to $50,000 in seed funding to foundations for new ideas. Our goal is to provide the support funders need to test their ideas and assumptions, and iterate as need be, before going on to the more costly process of building out a full project. Also in this round, we will be particularly interested in Open Government projects, an area we think shows great promise. Find out more at www.infoneeds.org. The challenge deadline has been extended to July 1, 2013.
Connect2Compete announces digital opportunity campaign in Bibb County schools:
Knight Foundation, Cox, Redemtech partner with national non-profit to bring reduced-cost Internet, affordable computers and digital training to local families. Find out more at http://kng.ht/WGTLiR.
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Canadian Immigration Tracker March 2024 - Key SlidesAndrew Griffith
Highlights
Permanent Residents decrease along with percentage of TR2PR decline to 52 percent of all Permanent Residents.
March asylum claim data not issued as of May 27 (unusually late). Irregular arrivals remain very small.
Study permit applications experiencing sharp decrease as a result of announced caps over 50 percent compared to February.
Citizenship numbers remain stable.
Slide 3 has the overall numbers and change.
Up the Ratios Bylaws - a Comprehensive Process of Our Organizationuptheratios
Up the Ratios is a non-profit organization dedicated to bridging the gap in STEM education for underprivileged students by providing free, high-quality learning opportunities in robotics and other STEM fields. Our mission is to empower the next generation of innovators, thinkers, and problem-solvers by offering a range of educational programs that foster curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking.
At Up the Ratios, we believe that every student, regardless of their socio-economic background, should have access to the tools and knowledge needed to succeed in today's technology-driven world. To achieve this, we host a variety of free classes, workshops, summer camps, and live lectures tailored to students from underserved communities. Our programs are designed to be engaging and hands-on, allowing students to explore the exciting world of robotics and STEM through practical, real-world applications.
Our free classes cover fundamental concepts in robotics, coding, and engineering, providing students with a strong foundation in these critical areas. Through our interactive workshops, students can dive deeper into specific topics, working on projects that challenge them to apply what they've learned and think creatively. Our summer camps offer an immersive experience where students can collaborate on larger projects, develop their teamwork skills, and gain confidence in their abilities.
In addition to our local programs, Up the Ratios is committed to making a global impact. We take donations of new and gently used robotics parts, which we then distribute to students and educational institutions in other countries. These donations help ensure that young learners worldwide have the resources they need to explore and excel in STEM fields. By supporting education in this way, we aim to nurture a global community of future leaders and innovators.
Our live lectures feature guest speakers from various STEM disciplines, including engineers, scientists, and industry professionals who share their knowledge and experiences with our students. These lectures provide valuable insights into potential career paths and inspire students to pursue their passions in STEM.
Up the Ratios relies on the generosity of donors and volunteers to continue our work. Contributions of time, expertise, and financial support are crucial to sustaining our programs and expanding our reach. Whether you're an individual passionate about education, a professional in the STEM field, or a company looking to give back to the community, there are many ways to get involved and make a difference.
We are proud of the positive impact we've had on the lives of countless students, many of whom have gone on to pursue higher education and careers in STEM. By providing these young minds with the tools and opportunities they need to succeed, we are not only changing their futures but also contributing to the advancement of technology and innovation on a broader scale.
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
1. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT I
I
Commissioned by
The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Prepared by
Kenneth Dautrich, The Stats Group August 2014
Future of the First Amendment
2014 Survey of High School Students and Teachers
2. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
3. Contents
Foreword 1
Executive Summary 3
Detailed Findings 4
Survey Methodology 15
About the Author 16
Student Questionnaire 17
Teacher Questionnaire 22
Future of the First Amendment
2014 Survey of High School Students and Teachers
4. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 1
Foreword
Like those before it, this survey holds a surprise.
For the first time, American high school students show a
greater overall appreciation for the First Amendment than do
adults.
More students than ever before say they are thinking about
the First Amendment. Nine in 10 say people should be able
to express unpopular opinions; six in 10 say the press should
not be censored by the government.
What happened? One explanation: the digital age. In 2011,
Connecticut researcher Ken Dautrich found “a clear, positive
relationship” between social media use and support for free
expression. He now finds the same link between digital
media use overall and the First Amendment.
Student news diets are increasingly digital, social and mobile.
In 2007, for example, only 8 percent of students surveyed
reported consuming news and information daily through
mobile devices. This time around, 62 percent do—another
all-time high.
As students become more and more connected to the never-ending
news streams in cyberspace, as they add their voices
to the global conversation, is it any wonder they seem to
know more, to care more, about the freedoms that make this
possible?
That said, teaching still matters. Indiana’s Jim Streisel, Dow
Jones Newspaper Fund Journalism Teacher of the Year at
Carmel High School, believes digital media works hand-in-hand
with the classroom. “If you’re a kid who has always
used social media, you’re enjoying the freedom you have
without thinking much about it,” he said. “When you take
a class, especially a media class, you start to understand
what that means, of how the First Amendment is behind the
scenes.”
This year’s Future of the First Amendment survey confirmed
that students who had a class dealing with the First
Amendment—7 in 10 said they did—support freedom of
expression in greater numbers.
Classes help even heavy media users. For example: 65% of
the students who use digital news daily agreed strongly
that people should be able to express unpopular opinions,
but if they had a First Amendment-related class, the strong
support for free speech rose to 69%. Same with students
who consumed news daily via social networks: 57% strongly
support unpopular opinions, but if they’ve also had a class,
the support rises to 61%. Ditto with daily news consumers via
mobile: without a class, 58%; with it, 62%.
Journalism teacher Streisel says it’s important for classes to
teach both media literacy and the First Amendment. That’s
the way it has always been in high school journalism classes.
Students create media responsibly, learn about the First
Amendment and emerge supporting freedom. But many of
today’s classes that teach about freedom do it from the view
of social studies or history, not the most hands-on approach.
“In driver’s ed,” Streisel says, “we don’t just show pictures of
cars and say ‘go drive one yourself’. We put an adult in there
to help students learn. Social media is the same way.”
The study raised other issues of concern. Most high school
students say that First Amendment rights should apply to
their school activities. But most teachers disagree. How can
the First Amendment be taught without being allowed? In
addition, most students oppose having their online activities
monitored by business or spied upon by government. Yet
few students (and few teachers) knew a lot about revelations
that the National Security Agency collects vast amounts of
domestic data from phone calls and emails.
Public opinion about the First Amendment matters. The
views of the people form the context within which the U.S.
Supreme Court interprets the amendment’s meaning. Yet we
by Eric Newton
Over the past 10 years,
Knight Foundation has
funded five Future of the
First Amendment surveys,
each probing what American
high school students know
and think about our most
fundamental freedoms.
5. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 2
know too well how volatile public opinion can be. After the 9/11 attacks, for example, adult support for the First Amendment
plummeted; the public was willing to give up some freedom in the name of national security. Support bounced back, only to
be sunk again after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing.
Whether young people will turn their First Amendment support into new and resilient social rules and norms is an open
question. But this new generation’s overwhelming use of social and mobile media—forms of media it will shape as students
grow older, in the best of all worlds influenced by good teachers—offers new hope that American values can live on in the
21st Century.
Eric Newton, former managing editor of the Oakland Tribune and founding managing editor of the Newseum, is Knight
Foundation’s senior adviser to the president. Future of the First Amendment survey results can be found at knightfoundation.
org/1stamendment.
Foreword
6. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 3
Executive Summary
Here are the key findings of the Knight Foundation’s 2014 Future of the First Amendment study, which polled 10,463 high
school students and 588 teachers:
For the first time in
the 10-year period of
the study, American
high school students
show a greater
appreciation for the
First Amendment
as a whole than do
adults.
First Amendment
support is highest
among students
who report
more frequently
consuming news and
information through
digital media and
those who report
taking a class that
has dealt with the
First Amendment.
While most high
school students
say that First
Amendment rights
should apply to their
school activities, the
majority of teachers
disagree.
Students are far less
concerned than
American adults
about the privacy
of the personal
information they give
out on the Internet.
Students largely
agree that
their electronic
communications
should not be subject
to government
surveillance
or tracked by
businesses.
Fewer than half
of the students
surveyed knew of
the National Security
Agency’s domestic
surveillance
program. They are
split over how they
feel about a person
who exposes such a
program.
Details of the survey methodology may be found in the appendix to this report, along with the questionnaires used in the 2014 student and teacher surveys. The 2004,
2006, 2007 and 2011 Future of the First Amendment reports may be found at knightfoundation.org/publications
1 2 3 4 5 6
7. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 4
Detailed Findings
American high school students have become more supportive of the First Amendment as a whole over the past decade. Today,
only 24 percent say that the First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees; many more students held that opinion in
2004 (35 percent) and 2006 (45 percent). In the surveys since 2006, students have increasingly rejected the idea that the First
Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees.
The Newseum Institute tracks the opinions of American adults on First Amendment issues. Since several questions in the Knight
survey are identical to those in the Newseum Institute survey, the views of American high school students can be compared
with those of American adults. Interestingly, while 10 years ago students (35 percent) were more likely than adults (30 percent)
to say that the First Amendment goes too far, today the roles are reversed: adults (38 percent) are more likely than students (24
percent) to feel this way.
2004 2006 2007 2011 2014
35%
30%
24%
18%
32%
25%
38%
23%
45%
23%
Student vs. Adult Support
% who say First Amendment goes too far
Students Adults
For the first time in the
10-year period of the study,
American high school
students show a greater
appreciation for the First
Amendment as a whole
than do adults.
Key Finding 1
8. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 5
Detailed Findings
2004 2006 2007 2011 2014
83%
70%
88%
70%
76%
63%
68%
90%
85%
51%
59%
54%
61%
54%
69%
The Knight Foundation’s Future of the First Amendment survey finds that students have become more supportive on other
questions as well. For example, today 88 percent of students agree that people should be allowed to express unpopular
opinions, compared with 83 percent who held that opinion 10 years ago and 76 percent who agreed in 2007.
Similarly, since 2004 more and more students have come to the opinion that newspapers should be allowed to publish freely
without government approval of a story. Ten years ago this rejection of censorship was supported by 51 percent of students;
today 61 percent feel that way.
Not every category is at an all-time high, however. Slightly fewer students this year than in 2011 believe people should be
allowed to sing songs with lyrics that others might find offensive. And fewer students today than a decade ago believe people
should be allowed to burn or deface the American flag as a political statement.
Student Support for First Amendment
% who agree with key statements
People should be allowed to express
unpopular opinions.
Newspapers should be allowed to
publish freely without government
approval of a story.
Musicians should be allowed to sing
songs with lyrics others might find
offensive.
9. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 6
Detailed Findings
First Amendment support
is highest among students
who report more frequently
consuming news and
information through digital
media and those who report
taking a class that has dealt
with the First Amendment.
Key Finding 2 First Amendment Support by Digital Media News Consumption
% who strongly agree people should be allowed to express unpopular opinions
A major finding in Knight’s 2011 Future of the First Amendment study was that greater use of social media is related to greater
support for the First Amendment. The 2014 study confirms and extends this finding, showing that students who more frequently
use mobile devices to obtain news and information and more frequently consume news from online sources are more likely to
support people’s right to express unpopular opinions than students who don’t frequently use mobile devices and online sources
for those purposes.
Digital media, including social media, have become the dominant way today’s high school students get news and information:
62 percent say they get news and information from mobile devices on at least a daily basis, and 62 percent say they use social
media at least daily to get news and information. This compares to a much smaller share of students (35 percent) who get news
on at least daily basis from television, and the tiny number (7 percent) who get news from a printed newspaper.
Read news online Use mobile devices Use social networks
71%
62%
53%
60%
62%
53%
48%
54%
62%
49%
54% 54%
More than once a day About once a day Several times a week Weekly or less
10. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 7
Students who take a class dealing with the First Amendment also are more likely to support First Amendment rights. From 2004
through 2014, the percentage of students saying that they have taken First Amendment classes has increased from 58 percent
to 70 percent. Students who take such classes are more likely to support the First Amendment; the 2014 survey finds that 58
percent of students who have taken First Amendment courses disagree that the First Amendment goes too far in the rights that
it guarantees compared with 47 percent of students who have not taken such courses.
Daily digital media users were even more likely to support fundamental freedoms if they also had a First Amendment-related
class. Among students who use mobile devices to get news daily, 58% percent strongly agreed that people should be able to
express unpopular opinions. But if you look at the students who use mobile devices daily and had a First Amendment class, the
number goes up to 62%. The same happens with daily social network users: 57% strongly support unpopular opinions without a
class, 61% strongly support them with a class. Of daily users of online news generally, 65% support unpopular opinions without
a class, but 69% support them with a class.
Teachers who have taught a First Amendment class are also more likely to support the First Amendment, with nearly nine in 10
disagreeing that it goes too far (88 percent) compared with teachers who do not teach First Amendment classes (72 percent).
Male students exhibit stronger support for First Amendment rights than female students based on several statements in the
survey including: Newspapers should be allowed to publish freely without government approval of a story (68 percent male
agreement, 53 percent female); Online websites should be allowed to publish freely without government approval of the
content (66 percent male vs. 52 percent female); Musicians should be allowed to sing songs with lyrics that others might find
offensive (73 percent male vs. 63 percent female).
Detailed Findings
11. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 8
“Students should be allowed to express their opinions about teachers and school administrators on
Facebook without worrying about being punished by school administrators for what they say.”
“High school students should be allowed to report on controversial issues in their student newspapers
without the approval of school authorities.”
Detailed Findings
29% 10%
29% 57% 2%
61%
Students
Teachers
Students tend to be supportive of First Amendment freedoms they can relate to personally. More than six in 10 students agree, for
example, that they should be allowed to express their opinions about teachers and school administrators on Facebook without
worrying about being punished by school authorities for what they post. More than six in 10 also agree that high school students
should be allowed to report on controversial issues in their school newspaper without the approval of school authorities.
Teachers, meanwhile, are far more reluctant to support these freedoms for students. Fully two-thirds of teachers disagree that
students should be held harmless for what they say about teachers and administrators on Facebook. And 57 percent disagree that
students should be allowed to report on controversial issues in their school newspaper without the approval of school authorities.
While most high school
students say that First
Amendment rights should
apply to their school
activities, the majority of
teachers disagree.
Key Finding 3
34% 5%
29% 67% 4%
61%
Students
Teachers
Agree Disagree Don’t know
Agree Disagree Don’t know
12. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 9
“Which one of the five rights in the First Amendment is the most important to you?”
Detailed Findings
While students clearly identify free speech as the most important First Amendment freedom, teachers are about as likely to
mention freedom of speech (40 percent) and freedom of religion (42 percent) as the most important right to them.
25% 2% 5%
42%
3%
40% 6% 5% 8%
65%
Students
Teachers
Freedom of speech Freedom of
the press
Freedom of religion Freedom to
peaceably assemble
Freedom to petition
the government
13. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 10
Detailed Findings
Students are far less
concerned than are
American adults about the
privacy of the personal
information they give out on
the Internet.
Key Finding 4 “How concerned are you personally about the privacy of information you give out on the Internet?”
Very concerned Somewhat
concerned
Not too concerned Not at all
concerned
Don’t know
21% 5% 4%
11%
42%
48% 35% 5% 1%
28%
Students
Adults (Gallup Poll)
The Gallup question wording is: “How concerned are you personally about the privacy of personal information you give out on the Internet, as well as privacy regarding
what you do on the Internet: very concerned, somewhat concerned, not too concerned or not at all concerned?”
Less than one-third of students are very concerned about the privacy of the information they give out on the Internet. Yet a
Gallup Poll of American adults conducted in October 2013 found that fully 48 percent—20 points higher than the students in
our survey—were very concerned about the privacy of the information they provide on the Internet. High school teachers are
even more concerned: 52 percent of them report being very concerned about their Internet privacy.
Students differ on the issue of Internet privacy by gender, with 75 percent of female students being at least somewhat
concerned about this, compared with 66 percent of male students.
When asked specifically how important it is that the content they post online be private and available only to those to whom
they want it to be available, 44 percent of the students say that is very important. Among teachers, 73 percent—29 points higher
than their students—consider the privacy of their own online content to be very important.
14. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 11
Detailed Findings
5%
3%
61%
12% 86%
34%
Students
Teachers
“People should be allowed to post their own videos/photographs on the Internet without anyone’s
permission, including those who are in the videos/photographs.”
“When you post a picture on a social networking site, do you think that others should be allowed to use
and distribute that picture without your permission?”
Agree Disagree Don’t know
Agree Disagree Don’t know
Teachers (86 percent) are more likely than students (61 percent) to disagree that people should be allowed to post photos and
videos without permission of those who are depicted in the photos and videos.
14%
8%
72%
10% 82%
14%
Students
Teachers
15. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 12
Detailed Findings
Students largely agree
that their electronic
communications should not
be subject to government
surveillance or tracked by
businesses
Key Finding 5 “People should be able to send online messages and make phone calls without government surveillance.”
“The government should be allowed to spy on anyone’s online messages and phone calls as a way of
identifying possible terrorists.”
Agree Disagree Don’t know
Agree Disagree Don’t know
83% 12% 5%
33% 60% 7%
By a large margin students do not want the government to monitor their computer or phone communications. When terrorism
is cited as the reason, the margin falls, though most students still do not approve of surveillance. They worry about this issue:
about one-in-five students have not made a phone call or sent an online message or text because they thought the government
might be secretly monitoring calls and online activity.
16. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 13
Detailed Findings
“Consumers should be able to search online without businesses tracking their activity.”
“Businesses should be allowed to track your searches online to personalize your search results
and sell you products.”
Agree Disagree Don’t know
Agree Disagree Don’t know
78% 14% 8%
20% 71% 9%
By majorities almost as large as the one opposed to government surveillance, students also felt their online activity should not
be tracked by businesses.
Students do not want business tracking them even if it resulted in personalized search results and product targeting—two
common practices. Teachers (87 percent) are even more likely than students (71 percent) to disagree that businesses should be
allowed to track their online activity.
17. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 14
Detailed Findings
Fewer than half of the
students surveyed knew
of the National Security
Agency’s domestic
surveillance program. They
are split over how they feel
about a person who exposes
such a program.
Key Finding 6 Awareness of NSA Surveillance
27% 20% 10%
24%
23%
28% 34% 12% 1%
20%
Students
Teachers
A lot Some A little Nothing at all Don’t know
Students have a low level of familiarity with the National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance of Americans: Nearly half (47
percent) say they have read or heard little or nothing about the story, and 10 percent don’t know enough about it to even
answer the question.
Teachers also reported low levels of knowledge about the NSA affair: 37 percent report low awareness of the story. Teachers
who report instructing a class that deals with the First Amendment are much more aware of the NSA surveillance story: 78
percent have at least some knowledge of it, compared with 56 percent of teachers who don’t teach First Amendment content.
Students were split when asked, “Would you approve or disapprove of the actions of a person who exposed a secret
government program that monitors all phone and Internet communications in a search for terrorists?” with 36 percent saying
they would approve while 29 percent would disapprove and the remainder did not know.
However, students with higher awareness of the NSA affair are much more likely to approve of the actions of someone who
exposed government secret programs. Specifically, 56 percent of those with a lot of awareness approve of this conduct,
compared with 44 percent of those with some awareness, 30 percent of those with a little awareness, and only 26 percent of
those with no awareness.
Also, those who consume news more frequently (and so are more likely to have learned about Edward Snowden, the onetime
NSA contractor who leaked the information about the NSA’s activities) are much more likely to approve of the actions of
a person who exposes a government secret program. For example, 39 percent of those who get news daily approve of
whistleblowing, compared with 25 percent who infrequently get news.
18. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 15
Appendix A
Survey Methodology This project was designed by Kenneth Dautrich, who is also responsible for the survey analysis and writing of this report.
This survey is the fifth in a series of surveys of high school students and teachers sponsored by Knight Foundation. Prior
surveys were conducted in 2004, 2006, 2007 and 2011. The initial survey in 2004 sampled over 300 high schools in the U.S.
For the 2006, 2007, 2011 and 2014 surveys, schools were randomly sampled from the list of schools that participated in the
2004 survey.
The overall design for conducting this project featured a multi-stage cluster sampling methodology. Employing this technique
produced a scientific, and thus generalizable, survey of both public and private high school students and teachers in the
United States. This technique involved drawing a representative national sample of 50 high schools in the United States. Survey
questions were vetted with both high school educators and those familiar with media literacy.
For each of these 50 schools, a phone call was placed to the school principal, asking if the school would be willing to participate
in the project. Thirty-one principals agreed to have their schools participate in the survey—a high response rate of 62 percent,
thus enhancing our confidence that the sample is a highly representative one. The principals coordinated the administration of
surveys to all students and teachers in their school.
Copies of the surveys that were administered to students and teachers may be found in the appendix to this report. In this
survey, the word “news” is defined as it is in the Free Merriam-Webster dictionary, meaning “new information or a report about
something that has recently happened.”
The field period for the survey began in March 2014 and closed in June 2014.
In total, 10,463 students and 588 teachers completed the questionnaires.
For the student survey, the results are accurate to within plus or minus 1 percentage point at the 95 percent level of confidence.
For the teachers, the results are accurate to within plus or minus 4 percentage points.
19. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 16
Appendix B
About the Author Professor Kenneth Dautrich is president of The Stats Group in Storrs, Connecticut. He teaches public opinion and public policy
at the University of Connecticut.
He is co-author of several books, including “The Enduring Democracy” (Wadsworth, 2013), “The Future of the First Amendment”
(Roman and Littlefield, 2008), “The First Amendment and the Media in the Court of Public Opinion” (Cambridge University Press,
2002), and “How the News Media Fail American Voters” (Columbia University Press, 1999).
Dautrich founded and formerly directed the Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut and has
been a senior research fellow at the Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University as well as a research
fellow at the Media Studies Center at Columbia University.
His professional credits include conducting a series of polls for Time magazine on the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections and
being an election night poll analyst at NBC News and a public broadcasting commentator on the presidential election process.
He has conducted an annual survey on the “State of the First Amendment” for the Newseum Institute since 1997.
He has a Ph.D. in political science from Rutgers University.
20. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 17
Appendix C
Student Questionnaire
1. What grade are you currently in (please check one box below) 2. How often do you get news, meaning new information or a report about
something that has recently happened?
9th 10th 11th 12th
2014 26% 29% 23% 22%
2011 30% 28% 25% 18%
2007 29% 29% 27% 15%
2006 30% 27% 24% 18%
2004 29% 27% 23% 19%
More than
once a day
About once
a day
Several
times a
week
About once
a week
Less than
once a week
Never
27% 32% 21% 11% 6% 3%
3. How often, if at all, do you do each of the following:
More than
once a day
About once
a day
Several
times
a week
About once
a week
Less than
once
a week
Never
Get news and information from mobile
devices such as smartphones and tablets? 40% 21% 13% 9% 8% 9%
Use online social networks to get news
and information? 40% 18% 14% 9% 9% 10%
Receive text messages that include news
or information? 14% 10% 10% 12% 16% 39%
Read a news article online.
8% 11% 14% 20% 25% 22%
Read a news article in print.
3% 5% 9% 16% 32% 36%
Watch a news story on TV.
13% 23% 22% 19% 15% 10%
Watch a video news story online.
7% 11% 16% 20% 26% 21%
Read a printed non-fiction book.
4% 5% 7% 10% 39% 36%
Read an electronic non-fiction book.
3% 3% 4% 7% 26% 57%
21. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 18
4. For each of the following statements, please indicate how much you agree or disagree:
People should be allowed to express unpopular opinions.
Strongly Agree Mildly Agree Mildly Disagree Strongly Disagree Don’t Know
2014 56% 34% 4% 1% 5%
2011 52% 36% 5% 1% 6%
2007 43% 33% 8% 4% 12%
2006 52% 33% 5% 2% 10%
2004 51% 32% 5% 2% 10%
Students should be allowed to express their opinions about teachers and
school administrators on Facebook without worrying about being punished by
teachers or school administrators for what they say.
2014 32% 29% 21% 13% 5%
2011 40% 29% 17% 9% 5%
People should be allowed to post their own videos/photographs on the Internet
without anyone’s permission, including those who are in the videos/photographs.
2014 12% 22% 36% 25% 5%
2011 13% 25% 34% 22% 6%
Musicians should be allowed to sing songs with lyrics that others might find offensive.
2014 36% 32% 18% 7% 7%
2011 39% 31% 17% 7% 6%
2007 33% 30% 15% 9% 13%
2006 37% 32% 16% 7% 8%
2004 40% 30% 14% 7% 9%
People should be allowed to burn or deface the American flag as political statement.
2014 7% 7% 11% 66% 9%
2011 6% 6% 12% 67% 9%
2007 8% 8% 12% 60% 11%
2006 7% 9% 12% 64% 8%
2004 8% 8% 11% 63% 10%
Appendix C
22. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 19
Appendix C
Newspapers should be allowed to publish freely without government approval of a story.
Strongly Agree Mildly Agree Mildly Disagree Strongly Disagree Don’t Know
2014 33% 28% 20% 9% 10%
2011 30% 29% 21% 10% 10%
2007 26% 28% 21% 11% 14%
2006 26% 28% 23% 13% 10%
2004 24% 27% 22% 14% 13%
Online websites should be allowed to publish freely without government approval of the content.
2014 30% 29% 21% 9% 10%
2011 28% 30% 21% 10% 11%
High school students should be allowed to report on controversial issues in
their student newspapers without the approval of school authorities.
2014 29% 32% 22% 7% 10%
2011 29% 32% 20% 8% 11%
People should be able to send online messages and make
phone calls without government surveillance.
58% 25% 9% 3% 5%
Consumers should be able to search online without businesses tracking their activity.
50% 28% 11% 3% 8%
23. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 20
Appendix C
5. The First Amendment became part of the U.S Constitution more than 200 years
ago. Here is what it says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of
speech or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Based on your own feelings about the First Amendment, how do you feel about the
following statement: The First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees.
Strongly
agree
Mildly agree
Mildly
disagree
Strongly
disagree
Don’t know
2014 8% 16% 22% 33% 21%
2011 7% 17% 22% 31% 23%
2007 12% 20% 21% 25% 21%
2006 18% 27% 16% 21% 19%
2004 12% 23% 19% 25% 21%
6. Which one of the five rights in the First Amendment is the most important to
you? (choose one only)
Freedom of
speech
Freedom of
the press
Freedom of
religion
Freedom to
peaceably
assemble
Freedom to
petition the
government
65% 3% 25% 2% 5%
7. Are the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment something you personally
think about or are they something you take for granted?
Personally think
about
Take for granted Don’t know
2014 34% 39% 27%
2011 29% 38% 33%
2007 25% 38% 36%
2006 24% 42% 34%
2004 27% 36% 37%
8. How concerned are you personally about the privacy of personal information
you give out on the Internet?
Very
concerned
Somewhat
concerned
Not too
concerned
Not at all
concerned
Don’t know
28% 42% 21% 5% 4%
9. How important is it to you that the content you post online be private and avail-able
only to those whom you want it to be available?
Very important
to me
Somewhat
important to me
Not too important
to me
Not important
at all
Don’t
know
44% 36% 11% 3% 6%
10. Do you agree or disagree with this statement: The government should be al-lowed
to spy on anyone’s online messages and phone calls as a way of identifying
possible terrorists?
Strongly agree Mildly agree
Mildly
disagree
Strongly
disagree
Don’t know
8% 25% 26% 34% 7%
11. Do you agree or disagree with this statement: Businesses should be allowed to
track your searches online to personalize your search results and sell you products.
Strongly agree Mildly agree Mildly disagree
Strongly
disagree
Don’t know
3% 17% 31% 40% 9%
12. How often, if ever, do you read user agreements or privacy statements for the
devices, social networks or wireless networks you use?
Always Often Not very often Never Don’t know
4% 10% 29% 51% 7%
13. Now thinking specifically about online privacy…Have you ever turned to any of
the following people or places for advice about how to manage your privacy on-line?
Yes No
Friend or peer 49% 51%
Brother, sister or cousin 36% 65%
Parent 42% 58%
Teacher 10% 90%
Website 29% 71%
14. When you post a picture on a social networking site, do you think that others
should be allowed to use and distribute that picture without your permission?
Yes No Don’t Know
14% 72% 14%
24. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 21
15. Have you ever thought about making a phone call or sending a text or online
message, but then decided not to because you thought the government was se-cretly
monitoring phone calls and online activity?
Yes No Don’t know
21% 69% 10%
16. Would you approve or disapprove of the actions of a person who exposed a
secret government program that monitors all phone and Internet communications
in a search for terrorists?
Approve Disapprove Don’t know
36% 29% 36%
17. How much have you heard or read about the NSA (a U.S. government agency)
obtaining records from telephone and Internet companies in order to compile tele-phone
call logs and Internet communications?
A lot Some A Little Nothing at all Don’t know
20% 23% 27% 20% 10%
18. What is your gender?
Male Female
2014 53% 47%
2011 52% 48%
2006 50% 50%
2004 50% 50%
19. Are you Spanish/Hispanic/Latino?
Yes No
2014 12% 89%
2011 11% 89%
2006 12% 88%
2004 15% 85%
20.What race are you?
White/
Caucasian
Black/
African-
American
American
Indian
Asian
Other
race
2014 73% 13% 2% 4% 8%
2011 73% 13% 3% 5% 6%
2006 73% 11% 1% 3% 12%
2004 68% 14% 2% 4% 12%
21. What is your family’s current financial situation?
Rich
Upper
Income
Middle
Income
Lower
Income
Poor
2014 4% 21% 61% 11% 3%
2011 3% 21% 60% 13% 3%
2006 4% 24% 61% 9% 2%
2004 5% 23% 59% 10% 4%
22 Which of the following grades is closest to your current overall
grade point average?
A B C D F
2014 40% 40% 17% 3% 1%
2011 33% 41% 22% 4% 1%
2006 30% 45% 21% 3% 1%
2004 28% 42% 23% 4% 2%
Appendix C
25. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 22
1. How often do you get news, meaning new information or a report about something that has recently happened?
More than once a
day
About once a day
Several times a
week
About once a week
Less than once a
week
Never
64% 22% 10% 3% 1% 0%
2. How often, if at all, do you do each of the following:
More than
once a day
About once
a day
Several
times
a week
About once
a week
Less than
once
a week
Never
Get news and information from mobile
devices such as smartphones and
tablets?
50% 18% 10% 4% 6% 12%
Use online social networks to get news
and information?
36% 18% 9% 6% 8% 24%
Receive text messages that include news
or information?
19% 11% 10% 6% 17% 37%
Read a news article online. 41% 22% 15% 11% 8% 2%
Read a news article in print. 15% 21% 18% 17% 20% 9%
Watch a news story on TV. 30% 29% 19% 9% 9% 5%
Watch a video news story online. 13% 22% 21% 18% 19% 6%
Read a printed non-fiction book. 9% 11% 12% 11% 45% 14%
Read an electronic non-fiction book. 3% 6% 8% 7% 35% 42%
Appendix D
Teacher Questionnaire
26. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 23
3. In the past three years have you taught any classes that dealt with the First Amendment to the U.S Constitution?
Yes No
2014 29% 71%
2011 30% 71%
2007 26% 74%
2006 29% 71%
2004 24% 76%
4. For each of the following statements, please indicate how much you agree or disagree:
People should be allowed to express unpopular opinions.
Strongly Agree Mildly Agree Mildly Disagree Strongly Disagree Don’t Know
2014 61% 35% 2% 1% 1%
2011 65% 30% 3% 1% 2%
2007 62% 32% 3% 2% 2%
2006 75% 21% 3% 1% 0%
2004 72% 25% 2% 1% 1%
Students should be allowed to express their opinions about teachers and
school administrators on Facebook without worrying about being punished by
teachers or school administrators for what they say.
2014 8% 21% 25% 42% 4%
2011 12% 24% 23% 38% 4%
People should be allowed to post their own videos/photographs on the Internet without anyone’s
permission, including those who are in the videos/photographs.
2014 2% 10% 26% 60% 3%
2011 4% 8% 22% 64% 2%
Musicians should be allowed to sing songs with lyrics that others might find offensive.
2014 37% 32% 16% 14% 1%
2011 32% 33% 17% 16% 2%
2007 25% 30% 21% 22% 3%
2006 35% 29% 19% 15% 2%
2004 28% 30% 19% 21% 2%
Appendix D
27. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 24
Appendix D
People should be allowed to burn or deface the American flag as a political statement
Strongly Agree Mildly Agree Mildly Disagree Strongly Disagree Don’t Know
2014 16% 13% 10% 57% 3%
2011 16% 13% 11% 58% 3%
2007 12% 12% 11% 61% 3%
2006 16% 13% 11% 58% 2%
2004 15% 13% 11% 59% 2%
Newspapers should be allowed to publish freely without government approval of a story.
2014 57% 26% 10% 5% 2%
2011 52% 26% 11% 8% 3%
2007 48% 28% 15% 5% 3%
2006 57% 22% 13% 7% 1%
2004 53% 27% 12% 6% 2%
Online websites should be allowed to publish freely without government approval of the content.
2014 48% 30% 13% 8% 2%
2011 40% 30% 16% 10% 4%
High school students should be allowed to report on controversial issues in their student
newspapers without the approval of school authorities.
2014 13% 28% 30% 27% 2%
2011 11% 24% 29% 33% 2%
2007 12% 23% 24% 38% 3%
2006 13% 27% 28% 31% 1%
2004 13% 26% 27% 31% 1%
People should be able to send online messages and make
phone calls without government surveillance.
54% 28% 12% 4% 2%
Consumers should be able to search online without businesses tracking their activity.
68% 23% 6% 2% 1%
28. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 25
5. The First Amendment became part of the U.S Constitution more than 200 years
ago. Here is what it says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of
speech or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Based on your own feelings about the First Amendment, how do you feel about the
following statement: The First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees.
Strongly
agree
Mildly agree
Mildly
disagree
Strongly
disagree
Don’t know
2014 4% 14% 20% 57% 6%
2011 6% 19% 18% 49% 9%
2007 8% 20% 20% 43% 8%
2006 12% 21% 12% 50% 5%
2004 9% 20% 16% 50% 5%
6. Which one of the five rights in the First Amendment is the most important to
you? (choose one only)
Freedom of
speech
Freedom of
the press
Freedom of
religion
Freedom to
peaceably
assemble
Freedom to
petition the
government
40% 7% 42% 5% 8%
7. Are the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment something you personally
think about or are they something you take for granted?
Personally think
about
Take for granted Don’t know
2014 48% 46% 6%
2011 53% 52% 5%
2007 49% 47% 5%
2006 49% 47% 4%
2004 50% 46% 4%
8. How concerned are you personally about the privacy of personal information
you give out on the Internet?
Very
concerned
Somewhat
concerned
Not too
concerned
Not at all
concerned
Don’t know
52% 38% 9% 1% 0%
9. How important is it to you that the content you post online be private and
available only to those whom you want it to be available?
Very important
to me
Somewhat
important to
me
Not too
important to
me
Not important
at all
Don’t know
73% 21% 5% 1% 1%
10. Do you agree or disagree with this statement: The government should be
allowed to spy on anyone’s online messages and phone calls as a way of identifying
possible terrorists?
Strongly agree Mildly agree Mildly disagree
Strongly
disagree
Don’t know
11% 35% 22% 29% 3%
11. Do you agree or disagree with this statement: Businesses should be allowed to
track your searches online to personalize your search results and sell you products.
Strongly agree Mildly agree Mildly disagree
Strongly
disagree
Don’t know
1% 10% 28% 59% 1%
12. How often, if ever, do you read user agreements or privacy statements for the
devices, social networks or wireless networks you use?
Always Often Not very often Never Don’t know
5% 16% 53% 26% 0%
13. When you post a picture on a social networking site, do you think that others
should be allowed to use and distribute that picture without your permission?
Yes No Don’t know
10% 82% 8%
Appendix D
29. KNIGHTFOUNDATION.ORG/1STAMENDMENT 26
14. Have you ever thought about making a phone call or sending a text or online
message, but then decided not to because you thought the government was
secretly monitoring phone calls and online activity?
Yes No Don’t know
12% 86% 3%
15. Would you approve or disapprove of the actions of a person who exposed a
secret government program that monitors all phone and internet communications
in a search for terrorists?
Approve Disapprove Don’t know
37% 26% 37%
16. How much have you heard or read about the NSA (a U.S. government agency)
obtaining records from telephone and Internet companies in order to compile tele-phone
call logs and Internet communications?
A lot Some A Little Nothing at all Don’t know
28% 34% 24% 12% 1%
17. What is your gender?
Male Female
2014 42% 58%
2011 42% 58%
2006 42% 58%
2004 42% 58%
Appendix D