2013
Get up, get, get, get down
Focus Groups are a joke in your town
Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Public_Enemy_4.jpg	

Dan Berlin
Experience Research Director, Mad*Pow
dberlin@madpow.com
@banderlin
2013
Why UXers should avoid focus groups
๏  Group dynamics
๏  Moderator bias
๏  Difficult to analyze
๏  Not going to reach consensus
2013
Group Dynamics – Personalities
๏  David vs. Goliath personalities
๏  Dominant voice will dominate the session
๏  Timid voice may have wonderful ideas
2013
Group Dynamics – Everybody Lies
๏  Participants want to seem more
interesting to those around them
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kaykim/3649886264/
2013
Group Dynamics – No Privacy
๏  Can’t discuss sensitive matters
๏  …and everything is sensitive
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dannysullivan/4173190152/
2013
Group Dynamics – Yawning!
๏  Yawning is contagious
๏  One yawn can kill a group’s momentum
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/supporttattoosandpiercingsatwork/8691355242/
2013
Group Dynamics – Interrupting Cows
๏  Participants who interrupt others deprive
us from data
Knock knock.	

Who’s there?	

An interrupting cow.	

An interrupting c…	

Moo.	

Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cow_cartoon_04.svg
2013
Moderator Bias – Experience
๏  Focus Groups are VERY reliant on a good
moderator
Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Leonard_Bernstein_3_Allan_Warren.jpg
2013
Moderator Bias – Stamina
๏  A moderator must be cheerful and attentive,
listen closely, take notes, and plan the next
question for 2 hours.
Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:David_Burlet_Friedrichsbau_variet%C3%A9_Plate_spinning_act.jpg
2013
Moderator Bias – Trust
๏  Moderators must instill a sense of trust
with multiple people in a short amount of
time
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/anspach/954545/sizes/m/in/photostream/
2013
Difficult to Analyze – Wandering
๏  Wandering conversations hamper note
taking efficiency
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/happy_sleepy/3351331153/sizes/m/in/photostream/
2013
Difficult to Analyze – Insights
๏  Almost impossible to quantify how many
people said something
๏  Hard to break down the data into
actionable insights
Source: http://www.texample.net/tikz/examples/escher-brick-penrose-t
2013
Difficult to Analyze – Shallow
๏  You can’t get in-depth answers
Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hilton_mug_shot.jpeg
2013
Difficult to Analyze – Marketing Data
๏  We are UXers gathering Marketing data
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/justjenn/8546896516/
2013
No Conclusions – Always reacting
๏  Participants are always reacting – they’re
not thoughtful
Source: http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3v3d37/
2013
No Conclusions – No consensus
๏  Not going to build consensus among
participants – leaves topics hanging
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/purplemattfish/3185323763/sizes/m/in/photostream/
2013
No Conclusions – No one used anything
๏  We can gather how participants feel about
something and their out-of-context
desires…
๏  But we aren’t gathering real-world data
๏  It’s all made up… by our participants
2013
Overnight Flight Example
๏  Focus groups said that they wanted
healthy snacks
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gezellig-girl/3784584015
2013
Overnight Flight Example
๏  Stewardess knew better and had
chocolate and sweets ready to go
Source: http://vintageseatcushions.deviantart.com/art/chocolate-fiend-154724164
2013
Why UXers Should Avoid Focus Groups
๏  Group dynamics are terrible
๏  Moderator bias is inevitable
๏  Difficult to analyze marketing data
๏  You’re not going to reach consensus
So get up, get, get, get down
Focus Groups are a joke in your town

Focus Groups are a Joke

  • 1.
    2013 Get up, get,get, get down Focus Groups are a joke in your town Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Public_Enemy_4.jpg Dan Berlin Experience Research Director, Mad*Pow dberlin@madpow.com @banderlin
  • 2.
    2013 Why UXers shouldavoid focus groups ๏  Group dynamics ๏  Moderator bias ๏  Difficult to analyze ๏  Not going to reach consensus
  • 3.
    2013 Group Dynamics –Personalities ๏  David vs. Goliath personalities ๏  Dominant voice will dominate the session ๏  Timid voice may have wonderful ideas
  • 4.
    2013 Group Dynamics –Everybody Lies ๏  Participants want to seem more interesting to those around them Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kaykim/3649886264/
  • 5.
    2013 Group Dynamics –No Privacy ๏  Can’t discuss sensitive matters ๏  …and everything is sensitive Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dannysullivan/4173190152/
  • 6.
    2013 Group Dynamics –Yawning! ๏  Yawning is contagious ๏  One yawn can kill a group’s momentum Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/supporttattoosandpiercingsatwork/8691355242/
  • 7.
    2013 Group Dynamics –Interrupting Cows ๏  Participants who interrupt others deprive us from data Knock knock. Who’s there? An interrupting cow. An interrupting c… Moo. Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cow_cartoon_04.svg
  • 8.
    2013 Moderator Bias –Experience ๏  Focus Groups are VERY reliant on a good moderator Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Leonard_Bernstein_3_Allan_Warren.jpg
  • 9.
    2013 Moderator Bias –Stamina ๏  A moderator must be cheerful and attentive, listen closely, take notes, and plan the next question for 2 hours. Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:David_Burlet_Friedrichsbau_variet%C3%A9_Plate_spinning_act.jpg
  • 10.
    2013 Moderator Bias –Trust ๏  Moderators must instill a sense of trust with multiple people in a short amount of time Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/anspach/954545/sizes/m/in/photostream/
  • 11.
    2013 Difficult to Analyze– Wandering ๏  Wandering conversations hamper note taking efficiency Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/happy_sleepy/3351331153/sizes/m/in/photostream/
  • 12.
    2013 Difficult to Analyze– Insights ๏  Almost impossible to quantify how many people said something ๏  Hard to break down the data into actionable insights Source: http://www.texample.net/tikz/examples/escher-brick-penrose-t
  • 13.
    2013 Difficult to Analyze– Shallow ๏  You can’t get in-depth answers Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hilton_mug_shot.jpeg
  • 14.
    2013 Difficult to Analyze– Marketing Data ๏  We are UXers gathering Marketing data Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/justjenn/8546896516/
  • 15.
    2013 No Conclusions –Always reacting ๏  Participants are always reacting – they’re not thoughtful Source: http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3v3d37/
  • 16.
    2013 No Conclusions –No consensus ๏  Not going to build consensus among participants – leaves topics hanging Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/purplemattfish/3185323763/sizes/m/in/photostream/
  • 17.
    2013 No Conclusions –No one used anything ๏  We can gather how participants feel about something and their out-of-context desires… ๏  But we aren’t gathering real-world data ๏  It’s all made up… by our participants
  • 18.
    2013 Overnight Flight Example ๏ Focus groups said that they wanted healthy snacks Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gezellig-girl/3784584015
  • 19.
    2013 Overnight Flight Example ๏ Stewardess knew better and had chocolate and sweets ready to go Source: http://vintageseatcushions.deviantart.com/art/chocolate-fiend-154724164
  • 20.
    2013 Why UXers ShouldAvoid Focus Groups ๏  Group dynamics are terrible ๏  Moderator bias is inevitable ๏  Difficult to analyze marketing data ๏  You’re not going to reach consensus So get up, get, get, get down Focus Groups are a joke in your town

Editor's Notes

  • #4 This will happen even if you have the best moderator in the world Irrelevant conversations, taking precious time
  • #5 People lie by omission too
  • #14 Get answers from everyone, talk about it a little bit, then move on