In this presentation Daniel Murdiyarso explains what the drivers of fire emissions from LUC are, how credibility can be promoted through MRV and what conclusions can be drawn.

1. Fire emissions from LUC:
Promoting credibility and incentives
Daniel Murdiyarso

2. Multi-scale drivers and responses
Murdiyarso and Lebel 2007

3. Promoting credibility through MRV
M
IPCC – Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF activities
• Publish data (area, biomass data, carbon density)
• Describe methodologies (measurements in 5 pools, use model
• Include all greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O, CH4)
• Document QA/QC procedures
R
IPCC Reporting Principle – managed uncertainties
• Consistency
• Transparency
• Comparability
• Completeness
• Accuracy
V
Validation
Project development phase
• Estimation of future GHG emissions reductions to be achieved
• Use models (historical trend, numeric, economic)
Verification Project monitoring phase
• Confirmation of actual GHG emission reductions achieved
during crediting period
• Compare between estimations and observations

4. Developing higher Tier EFs is possible

5. 2006 IPCC Guidelines:
2013 Wetlands supplement

6. Concluding remarks
 Indonesia has good practice MRV for emission
hotspots in place
 Linking GHG emissions and removals with IPCC
Guidelines will ensure credibility
 Fire emissions may be included