The document summarizes feedback from a questionnaire about a student film. Most respondents were students who correctly identified the genre as a psychological thriller. The majority understood the storyline and thought the shots and music were suitable. Responses varied on the appropriate age rating but most said 15. While the title sequence could be improved, most audience members liked it. Most thought the film would be suitable for a short film festival and would recommend it to others. Areas for potential improvement included the storyline, music, and title sequence.

1. Final Questionnaire
Feedback
ALICE RICHARDSON, LEAH WALKER, DYLAN WILSON AND ADAM PYE

2. Question 1
To begin with we wanted to see who our
main demographic would be. Our target
audience was 15+ and this has been
proven in our questionnaire. Most people
who watched the film were students which
is what we expected.

3. Question 2
Our genre was Psychological thriller
therefore we were happy that most
people saw that. Three people thought
It was a psychological horror, we can
understand why people thought this
because of Ava being a sinister dead
figure however it was a psychological
thriller as there were no extreme scary
moments.

4. Question 3
The majority of people understood our storyline which was a main worry when creating
our film. We added a extra scene to explain what happened in the film which is why
more people understood the final film from the rough cut.

5. Question 4
Again, most people thought the shots
were suitable and fitted our genre and
storyline. We tried to use a variety of
shots in order to keep the audience
interested and excited.

6. Question 5
On our rough cut of the film we used different music however from the previous questionnaire
feedback and from watching the film on YouTube we realised that we needed to change it. We are very
happy that people thought this music was appropriate for our final film.

7. Question 6
There was a variety of different answers for this
question. Most people said 15 which is what the
certificate is for our film as it contains bad
language and some violence.

8. Question 7
We worked hard on our title sequence however we thought it could be a little more exciting
therefore we wanted to see what our audience thought. If we had more time we would have
improved the title sequence however most of our audience liked the title sequence.

9. Question 8
We thought our film could be seen on
any of these platforms therefore we
wanted to see what our demographic
thought. Most people thought a short
film festival.

10. Question 9
The majority of people would recommend our film which was what we hoped for.

11. Question 10
 We asked the audience what could be improved in our film and these were the
responses: