Federalists vs antifederalist notes
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
1 like•730 views
The document summarizes the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the ratification of the US Constitution. It provides background on the purpose of the Federalist Papers to promote ratification and the Anti-Federalist response. It also examines Alexander Hamilton's view in Federalist No. 84 that a bill of rights was unnecessary and potentially dangerous in contrast to the Anti-Federalist position that a bill of rights was needed to protect individual liberties.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Reading like a historian federalists vs antifederalists
1) Melancton Smith argues that the number of representatives should be large so that both rich and poor citizens will choose to run for office, ensuring the government represents ordinary people.
2) Alexander Hamilton counters that experience shows pure democracies fail and become tyrannical. He also argues one can understand the needs of fifty constituents as well as twenty.
3) Both advocate for their positions, with Smith wanting more representatives to give voice to all citizens and Hamilton defending the new Constitution's provisions.
Federalist papers lesson plan student copy
The document provides background information on the Articles of Confederation, the Constitutional Convention, and the Federalist Papers. It summarizes that the Articles of Confederation created a weak national government, leading states to call the Constitutional Convention to draft a new Constitution. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay wrote the Federalist Papers to advocate for ratifying the new Constitution, addressing concerns around federalism, separation of powers, and creating a republic. It also summarizes opposing views from the Anti-Federalists and how the Bill of Rights was eventually added.
Federalists &; anti federalists mini lesson
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the ratification of the US Constitution. The Anti-Federalists wanted a weak central government and strong state governments, fearing a strong central authority would be similar to a monarchy. They opposed the Constitution as originally drafted because it did not include protections for individual liberties. The Federalists argued a strong central government was necessary to govern the nation effectively and represent it externally. They believed the separation of powers built into the Constitution would prevent abuse of authority. In the end, the Federalists agreed to add a Bill of Rights to the Constitution to gain the Anti-Federalists' approval.
Federalists vs antifederalists
The document summarizes the key dividing issues between Federalists and Antifederalists during the ratification of the US Constitution:
- Federalists supported a stronger central government, while Antifederalists had concerns about states' rights.
- The Federalist Papers, written anonymously by Federalists, argued that separation of powers and checks and balances would prevent abuse of power by the new government.
- Antifederalists responded by writing their own essays expressing concerns about the need for a bill of rights protecting individual liberties.
- Alexander Hamilton argued in Federalist No. 84 that a bill of rights was unnecessary and potentially dangerous in a constitution founded on popular sovereignty.
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalists
The Federalists supported a strong central government while the Antifederalists opposed increased federal power and supported states' rights. The Federalist Papers, written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, argued in favor of ratifying the United States Constitution. They wanted to influence the vote and shape the new government. The Antifederalists worried that a strong federal government could become tyrannical and opposed adding a bill of rights to limit federal power over individuals. Their debates centered on the balance between federal and state authority.
Federalists vs. anti federalists
The document outlines the key differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the debate over ratifying the US Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed ratifying the Constitution as written and argued that the new national government would be too large and distant, could grow into a tyranny, and gave too much power to the central government and executive branch. Federalists supported ratifying the Constitution and countered that a central government with checks and balances could effectively govern the large nation and would not become a tyranny due to the separation of powers between branches of government.
Federalist And Antifederalist
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Antifederalists following the drafting of the US Constitution. The Federalists supported a stronger central government and ratifying the new Constitution. The Antifederalists believed it gave the national government too much power and not enough power to the states. Both sides made arguments in publications like the Federalist Papers and Antifederalist Papers to advocate their positions as the Constitution was debated for ratification.
Federalists and anti federalists
The document summarizes the key differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists supported a strong central government with powers superior to the states, while Anti-Federalists favored a weak central government with states holding most power. Federalists saw benefits to a growing business-based society and national bank, whereas Anti-Federalists wanted to protect the interests of small farmers and were wary of big business influence. The groups also differed on issues like states' rights, expansion, standing armies, and foreign relations, with Federalists generally favoring a stronger national government and Anti-Federalists wanting to limit federal power.
Recommended
Reading like a historian federalists vs antifederalists
1) Melancton Smith argues that the number of representatives should be large so that both rich and poor citizens will choose to run for office, ensuring the government represents ordinary people.
2) Alexander Hamilton counters that experience shows pure democracies fail and become tyrannical. He also argues one can understand the needs of fifty constituents as well as twenty.
3) Both advocate for their positions, with Smith wanting more representatives to give voice to all citizens and Hamilton defending the new Constitution's provisions.
Federalist papers lesson plan student copy
The document provides background information on the Articles of Confederation, the Constitutional Convention, and the Federalist Papers. It summarizes that the Articles of Confederation created a weak national government, leading states to call the Constitutional Convention to draft a new Constitution. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay wrote the Federalist Papers to advocate for ratifying the new Constitution, addressing concerns around federalism, separation of powers, and creating a republic. It also summarizes opposing views from the Anti-Federalists and how the Bill of Rights was eventually added.
Federalists &; anti federalists mini lesson
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the ratification of the US Constitution. The Anti-Federalists wanted a weak central government and strong state governments, fearing a strong central authority would be similar to a monarchy. They opposed the Constitution as originally drafted because it did not include protections for individual liberties. The Federalists argued a strong central government was necessary to govern the nation effectively and represent it externally. They believed the separation of powers built into the Constitution would prevent abuse of authority. In the end, the Federalists agreed to add a Bill of Rights to the Constitution to gain the Anti-Federalists' approval.
Federalists vs antifederalists
The document summarizes the key dividing issues between Federalists and Antifederalists during the ratification of the US Constitution:
- Federalists supported a stronger central government, while Antifederalists had concerns about states' rights.
- The Federalist Papers, written anonymously by Federalists, argued that separation of powers and checks and balances would prevent abuse of power by the new government.
- Antifederalists responded by writing their own essays expressing concerns about the need for a bill of rights protecting individual liberties.
- Alexander Hamilton argued in Federalist No. 84 that a bill of rights was unnecessary and potentially dangerous in a constitution founded on popular sovereignty.
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalists
The Federalists supported a strong central government while the Antifederalists opposed increased federal power and supported states' rights. The Federalist Papers, written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, argued in favor of ratifying the United States Constitution. They wanted to influence the vote and shape the new government. The Antifederalists worried that a strong federal government could become tyrannical and opposed adding a bill of rights to limit federal power over individuals. Their debates centered on the balance between federal and state authority.
Federalists vs. anti federalists
The document outlines the key differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the debate over ratifying the US Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed ratifying the Constitution as written and argued that the new national government would be too large and distant, could grow into a tyranny, and gave too much power to the central government and executive branch. Federalists supported ratifying the Constitution and countered that a central government with checks and balances could effectively govern the large nation and would not become a tyranny due to the separation of powers between branches of government.
Federalist And Antifederalist
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Antifederalists following the drafting of the US Constitution. The Federalists supported a stronger central government and ratifying the new Constitution. The Antifederalists believed it gave the national government too much power and not enough power to the states. Both sides made arguments in publications like the Federalist Papers and Antifederalist Papers to advocate their positions as the Constitution was debated for ratification.
Federalists and anti federalists
The document summarizes the key differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists supported a strong central government with powers superior to the states, while Anti-Federalists favored a weak central government with states holding most power. Federalists saw benefits to a growing business-based society and national bank, whereas Anti-Federalists wanted to protect the interests of small farmers and were wary of big business influence. The groups also differed on issues like states' rights, expansion, standing armies, and foreign relations, with Federalists generally favoring a stronger national government and Anti-Federalists wanting to limit federal power.
Federalist Vs
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the interpretation of the Elastic Clause, or Necessary and Proper Clause, of the US Constitution. Federalists supported a broad interpretation that allowed implied powers, wanting a strong federal government, while Anti-Federalists advocated for a limited federal government with only enumerated powers. The document also notes that the Federalist Papers aimed to influence ratification debates and future constitutional interpretation in favor of the Federalist perspective.
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Notes
The Federalists, led by figures like James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, supported a stronger central government and ratifying the Constitution as written. The Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson and George Mason, represented farmers and lower classes who wanted more state power and opposed the Constitution without added protections for individual rights like a Bill of Rights. The two sides debated the appropriate balance of federal versus state power.
Federalists Vs. Anti Federalists
The document discusses the debate around ratifying the new U.S. Constitution between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported ratification and a strong central government, believing it would protect individual liberties, while the Anti-Federalists opposed ratification and favored state power over a strong central government. Both sides engaged in a public debate through publications like the Federalist Papers, written by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay to support ratification, and the Letter from the Federal Farmer, which outlined rights the Anti-Federalists felt needed protecting.
Federalists and anti-federalists
The document summarizes the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists following the 1787 Constitutional Convention. The Federalists supported the new Constitution and a strong federal government led by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay. They authored the Federalist Papers to advocate for ratification. The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and powerful central government, preferring stronger state control; they were led by figures like Patrick Henry and published their own critiques.
Federalist papers presentation
Federalist Papers PowerPoint with a brief overview showing the purposes and intent of the Federalist Papers as they were written by various Founding Fathers (Hamilton, Madison, Jefferson) as they tried to show the logic and reasoning behind the proposed structure of the future U.S. Constitution, as they hammered out details prior to final ratification at the Constitutional Convention.
Federalists Papers
This lesson teaches students about the Federalist Papers by having them first discuss current issues and how citizens stay informed. Students then read about the Federalist Papers and the debate around ratifying the Constitution. They break into groups representing Federalists and Anti-Federalists to role play a debate on issues from adopting the Constitution. The lesson aims to explain the arguments in the Federalist Papers for a stronger national government that preserves individual freedoms and rights.
Federalists vs. Republicans
An indepth study of these two groups with compare and contrast slides as well as practice test questions. Well worth a look for those studying this time period. From a National Hall of Fame Teacher.
Hamilton v Jefferson
George Washington was the first president of the United States and established important precedents for the office. The document discusses Washington's service during the Revolutionary War and asks what five questions an essay about his life should answer. It also discusses conflicts between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson that resulted in the emergence of two political parties with differing views on economic policy, foreign policy, and the interpretation of the Constitution.
Federalist No 01
- Federalist No. 1 introduces the debate over ratifying the proposed US Constitution and urges citizens of New York to make their decision based on the public good rather than personal interests or passions.
- Hamilton acknowledges his belief that adopting the Constitution is in the best interest of the people's liberty, dignity, and happiness.
- He outlines topics to be addressed in future papers, including the benefits of the Union, deficiencies of the Articles of Confederation, necessity of an energetic government, conformity of the Constitution to republican principles, and answers to objections against ratifying the Constitution.
Federalist Papers
The document summarizes debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the proposed US Constitution in 1787. The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, made the case for ratification. Key Federalist arguments included that a large federal republic would protect liberty better than small republics, and that separating powers among branches of government would prevent tyranny. Anti-Federalists like Brutus argued the Constitution would lead to the destruction of liberty by consolidating power and allowing a standing army. They also felt the presidency would become an elective monarchy and large republics could not remain free.
Anti Federalists(Govt Project)
Anti-Federalists opposed the new US Constitution because they believed it concentrated too much power in the national government and threatened individual liberties. They argued for stronger state governments, direct elections, and term limits to empower common people. While initially against ratifying the Constitution, Anti-Federalists eventually supported it after the Bill of Rights was added to protect individual rights.
Hamilton vs jefferson opposition grudge match
The document describes a debate between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson's differing views on domestic and foreign policies during Washington's presidency. Students are asked to select which political figure they agree with more on several issues through a series of multiple choice questions. These issues include handling national debt, federalism, economic priorities, representation in government, interpreting the Constitution, and foreign policy regarding supporting revolutionaries in other countries. Selecting answers on the left or right side reveals whether the student's views align more closely with Hamilton or Jefferson.
Hamilton and Jefferson Notes
Jefferson and Hamilton disagreed on their views of human nature, the ideal economy, and the role of government. Jefferson believed that people were capable of self-governance, advocated for an agrarian economy centered around independent farmers, and favored state power over a strong central government. In contrast, Hamilton thought that people needed guidance from a small group of elite leaders, supported a manufacturing economy led by business interests, and envisioned a powerful federal government.
The Political Parties Of The Past And Present.Ppt Chs
The document compares the historical Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties in early U.S. history, noting their differences around issues like alliances, trade policies, and interpretations of the Constitution. It then discusses some similarities between the parties and outlines some modern positions of the Democratic and Republican parties, such as Democrats supporting stem cell research and affordable healthcare while Republicans support adoption and the death penalty.
Federalists v Antifederalists
The Necessary and Proper Clause gave Congress implied powers not specifically enumerated in the Constitution. Federalists supported this "elastic clause" because they favored a loose interpretation allowing the government to adapt, while Antifederalists opposed it fearing expanded abusive government power. Federalists believed a strong central government was necessary, but Antifederalists feared it would undermine state autonomy. Federalists thought checks and balances would protect citizens' rights, but Antifederalists argued only a bill of rights could guarantee these protections.
Federalists Vs. Anti Federalists Chart
The document outlines the differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the ratification of the US Constitution. Federalists supported the Constitution as it created a strong national government, while Anti-Federalists opposed it out of fear that the national government would have too much power and take away individual rights. The document provides a template to compare the views and stances of the two groups.
Jefferson vs Hamilton
The document summarizes the emergence of the first political parties in the United States - the Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson. It outlines some of the key differences between the parties, including who supported each party (Federalists appealed more to the wealthy and cities, Democratic-Republicans appealed more to farmers and Southerners/Westerners), their views on interpreting the Constitution (Federalists supported a loose interpretation with implied powers while Democratic-Republicans supported a strict interpretation), their views on foreign policy (Federalists wanted alliances with Britain, Democratic-Republicans supported the French Revolution) and economics (Federalists supported a national bank and high tariffs while Democratic-Republicans opposed those
The federalists papers
The document contains excerpts from several Federalist Papers discussing key principles of the US Constitution:
- Federalist 23 by Hamilton describes the main purposes of the Union as common defense, preserving public peace, regulating commerce between states and foreign nations.
- Federalist 47 by Madison states that accumulation of all governmental powers in the same entity results in tyranny.
- Federalist 51 by Madison explains that governmental controls are needed because those who govern are still human and require obligations to control themselves.
- Federalist 72 by Hamilton argues against limiting presidential terms, saying the experience of office makes one wiser in governing nations.
- Federalist 78 by Hamilton maintains an independent judiciary is essential to protect
Political philosophy behind Constitution, Federalist Papers, and Leaders
A breakdown of the various philosophies that went into the writing of the Constitution as used by the Framers. Includes Federalists Papers as well.
Ratification of the Constitution
This document summarizes the ratification process of the US Constitution. It explains that 9 of the 13 original states had to ratify the Constitution for it to take effect. It describes the arguments made by Anti-Federalists, who opposed ratification due to concerns about individual rights protections and the scope of national government power. It also outlines the counterarguments of Federalists in favor of ratification and a stronger central government. Finally, it lists the dates that each state ratified the Constitution.
Top Antifederalist Apprehensions
A history of the top Antifederalist apprehensions about the Constituiton. The Antifederalists, also known as opponents of enemies of the Constitution, brought up several claims that were disputed by the Federalist supporters of the document. Among them was the lack of a Bill of Rights, the thought that the federal government would overwhelm and usurp authority from the states, and that the general judiciary would be too powerful. These debates were of paramount importance.
Immigration and the rise of cities
The document discusses immigration and the rise of cities in the United States during the 19th century. It describes how midwestern cities grew along rivers and canals, with cities like Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and Louisville becoming important centers of industry and trade. Many Irish immigrants came to the U.S. due to the potato famine, and were often forced to remain in the cities where they first arrived. German immigrants primarily came for economic and religious freedom, and settled throughout the Midwest where they had an easier time relocating. Nativist sentiment led some Protestants to mistreat Catholic immigrants and the anti-immigrant Know Nothing party was established with goals including reducing immigration. Nativism resulted in riots in many cities, including Philadelphia
More Related Content
What's hot
Federalist Vs
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the interpretation of the Elastic Clause, or Necessary and Proper Clause, of the US Constitution. Federalists supported a broad interpretation that allowed implied powers, wanting a strong federal government, while Anti-Federalists advocated for a limited federal government with only enumerated powers. The document also notes that the Federalist Papers aimed to influence ratification debates and future constitutional interpretation in favor of the Federalist perspective.
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Notes
The Federalists, led by figures like James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, supported a stronger central government and ratifying the Constitution as written. The Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson and George Mason, represented farmers and lower classes who wanted more state power and opposed the Constitution without added protections for individual rights like a Bill of Rights. The two sides debated the appropriate balance of federal versus state power.
Federalists Vs. Anti Federalists
The document discusses the debate around ratifying the new U.S. Constitution between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported ratification and a strong central government, believing it would protect individual liberties, while the Anti-Federalists opposed ratification and favored state power over a strong central government. Both sides engaged in a public debate through publications like the Federalist Papers, written by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay to support ratification, and the Letter from the Federal Farmer, which outlined rights the Anti-Federalists felt needed protecting.
Federalists and anti-federalists
The document summarizes the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists following the 1787 Constitutional Convention. The Federalists supported the new Constitution and a strong federal government led by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay. They authored the Federalist Papers to advocate for ratification. The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and powerful central government, preferring stronger state control; they were led by figures like Patrick Henry and published their own critiques.
Federalist papers presentation
Federalist Papers PowerPoint with a brief overview showing the purposes and intent of the Federalist Papers as they were written by various Founding Fathers (Hamilton, Madison, Jefferson) as they tried to show the logic and reasoning behind the proposed structure of the future U.S. Constitution, as they hammered out details prior to final ratification at the Constitutional Convention.
Federalists Papers
This lesson teaches students about the Federalist Papers by having them first discuss current issues and how citizens stay informed. Students then read about the Federalist Papers and the debate around ratifying the Constitution. They break into groups representing Federalists and Anti-Federalists to role play a debate on issues from adopting the Constitution. The lesson aims to explain the arguments in the Federalist Papers for a stronger national government that preserves individual freedoms and rights.
Federalists vs. Republicans
An indepth study of these two groups with compare and contrast slides as well as practice test questions. Well worth a look for those studying this time period. From a National Hall of Fame Teacher.
Hamilton v Jefferson
George Washington was the first president of the United States and established important precedents for the office. The document discusses Washington's service during the Revolutionary War and asks what five questions an essay about his life should answer. It also discusses conflicts between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson that resulted in the emergence of two political parties with differing views on economic policy, foreign policy, and the interpretation of the Constitution.
Federalist No 01
- Federalist No. 1 introduces the debate over ratifying the proposed US Constitution and urges citizens of New York to make their decision based on the public good rather than personal interests or passions.
- Hamilton acknowledges his belief that adopting the Constitution is in the best interest of the people's liberty, dignity, and happiness.
- He outlines topics to be addressed in future papers, including the benefits of the Union, deficiencies of the Articles of Confederation, necessity of an energetic government, conformity of the Constitution to republican principles, and answers to objections against ratifying the Constitution.
Federalist Papers
The document summarizes debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the proposed US Constitution in 1787. The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, made the case for ratification. Key Federalist arguments included that a large federal republic would protect liberty better than small republics, and that separating powers among branches of government would prevent tyranny. Anti-Federalists like Brutus argued the Constitution would lead to the destruction of liberty by consolidating power and allowing a standing army. They also felt the presidency would become an elective monarchy and large republics could not remain free.
Anti Federalists(Govt Project)
Anti-Federalists opposed the new US Constitution because they believed it concentrated too much power in the national government and threatened individual liberties. They argued for stronger state governments, direct elections, and term limits to empower common people. While initially against ratifying the Constitution, Anti-Federalists eventually supported it after the Bill of Rights was added to protect individual rights.
Hamilton vs jefferson opposition grudge match
The document describes a debate between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson's differing views on domestic and foreign policies during Washington's presidency. Students are asked to select which political figure they agree with more on several issues through a series of multiple choice questions. These issues include handling national debt, federalism, economic priorities, representation in government, interpreting the Constitution, and foreign policy regarding supporting revolutionaries in other countries. Selecting answers on the left or right side reveals whether the student's views align more closely with Hamilton or Jefferson.
Hamilton and Jefferson Notes
Jefferson and Hamilton disagreed on their views of human nature, the ideal economy, and the role of government. Jefferson believed that people were capable of self-governance, advocated for an agrarian economy centered around independent farmers, and favored state power over a strong central government. In contrast, Hamilton thought that people needed guidance from a small group of elite leaders, supported a manufacturing economy led by business interests, and envisioned a powerful federal government.
The Political Parties Of The Past And Present.Ppt Chs
The document compares the historical Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties in early U.S. history, noting their differences around issues like alliances, trade policies, and interpretations of the Constitution. It then discusses some similarities between the parties and outlines some modern positions of the Democratic and Republican parties, such as Democrats supporting stem cell research and affordable healthcare while Republicans support adoption and the death penalty.
Federalists v Antifederalists
The Necessary and Proper Clause gave Congress implied powers not specifically enumerated in the Constitution. Federalists supported this "elastic clause" because they favored a loose interpretation allowing the government to adapt, while Antifederalists opposed it fearing expanded abusive government power. Federalists believed a strong central government was necessary, but Antifederalists feared it would undermine state autonomy. Federalists thought checks and balances would protect citizens' rights, but Antifederalists argued only a bill of rights could guarantee these protections.
Federalists Vs. Anti Federalists Chart
The document outlines the differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the ratification of the US Constitution. Federalists supported the Constitution as it created a strong national government, while Anti-Federalists opposed it out of fear that the national government would have too much power and take away individual rights. The document provides a template to compare the views and stances of the two groups.
Jefferson vs Hamilton
The document summarizes the emergence of the first political parties in the United States - the Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson. It outlines some of the key differences between the parties, including who supported each party (Federalists appealed more to the wealthy and cities, Democratic-Republicans appealed more to farmers and Southerners/Westerners), their views on interpreting the Constitution (Federalists supported a loose interpretation with implied powers while Democratic-Republicans supported a strict interpretation), their views on foreign policy (Federalists wanted alliances with Britain, Democratic-Republicans supported the French Revolution) and economics (Federalists supported a national bank and high tariffs while Democratic-Republicans opposed those
The federalists papers
The document contains excerpts from several Federalist Papers discussing key principles of the US Constitution:
- Federalist 23 by Hamilton describes the main purposes of the Union as common defense, preserving public peace, regulating commerce between states and foreign nations.
- Federalist 47 by Madison states that accumulation of all governmental powers in the same entity results in tyranny.
- Federalist 51 by Madison explains that governmental controls are needed because those who govern are still human and require obligations to control themselves.
- Federalist 72 by Hamilton argues against limiting presidential terms, saying the experience of office makes one wiser in governing nations.
- Federalist 78 by Hamilton maintains an independent judiciary is essential to protect
Political philosophy behind Constitution, Federalist Papers, and Leaders
A breakdown of the various philosophies that went into the writing of the Constitution as used by the Framers. Includes Federalists Papers as well.
Ratification of the Constitution
This document summarizes the ratification process of the US Constitution. It explains that 9 of the 13 original states had to ratify the Constitution for it to take effect. It describes the arguments made by Anti-Federalists, who opposed ratification due to concerns about individual rights protections and the scope of national government power. It also outlines the counterarguments of Federalists in favor of ratification and a stronger central government. Finally, it lists the dates that each state ratified the Constitution.
What's hot (20)
The Political Parties Of The Past And Present.Ppt Chs
The Political Parties Of The Past And Present.Ppt Chs
Political philosophy behind Constitution, Federalist Papers, and Leaders
Political philosophy behind Constitution, Federalist Papers, and Leaders
Viewers also liked
Top Antifederalist Apprehensions
A history of the top Antifederalist apprehensions about the Constituiton. The Antifederalists, also known as opponents of enemies of the Constitution, brought up several claims that were disputed by the Federalist supporters of the document. Among them was the lack of a Bill of Rights, the thought that the federal government would overwhelm and usurp authority from the states, and that the general judiciary would be too powerful. These debates were of paramount importance.
Immigration and the rise of cities
The document discusses immigration and the rise of cities in the United States during the 19th century. It describes how midwestern cities grew along rivers and canals, with cities like Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and Louisville becoming important centers of industry and trade. Many Irish immigrants came to the U.S. due to the potato famine, and were often forced to remain in the cities where they first arrived. German immigrants primarily came for economic and religious freedom, and settled throughout the Midwest where they had an easier time relocating. Nativist sentiment led some Protestants to mistreat Catholic immigrants and the anti-immigrant Know Nothing party was established with goals including reducing immigration. Nativism resulted in riots in many cities, including Philadelphia
The Age of Jackson Guided Notes
This document provides information about Andrew Jackson and key events during the Age of Jackson, including his elections in 1824 and 1828, the development of Jacksonian democracy, the Nullification Crisis, Indian removal, and the Trail of Tears. It does so through a series of questions about Jackson's presidency, the split of the Democratic-Republican party, the spoils system, South Carolina's nullification act, the Indian Removal Act, and the Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Cherokee that was not enforced.
Tennessee Statehood Notes
William Blount was the first governor of the Southwest Territory and established the first temporary capital in Knoxville. He later moved the capital to Nashville, which was named for American Revolutionary War hero Francis Nash. The Treaty of Holston established peace between the Cherokee and United States and guaranteed travel along the Tennessee River. John Sevier was the first and only governor of the lost state of Franklin and was a famous military leader. When Tennessee became a state in 1796, Sevier was elected as its first governor. The three main river systems are the Tennessee, Cumberland, and Mississippi Rivers, which are all connected and were significant for transportation and trade.
Colonial Slavery Guided Notes
This document contains guided notes about colonial slavery. It includes questions about the origins of African slavery in the colonies, the triangular trade system that transported slaves from Africa to the Americas, the first Africans who arrived in Jamestown as indentured servants, Virginia becoming the first colony to legalize slavery, and the number of colonies that permitted slavery. It also asks about the Middle Passage experience, reasons slaves refused food and were forced to eat, common causes of death during the passage and what was done with bodies. Questions cover examples of passive and overt slave resistance, the definition of a "maroon colony", results of slave uprisings, and the purpose of slave codes.
French and Indian War guided notes
The French and Indian War was fought between the British and French over control of the Ohio River Valley, which was desirable for fur trading and westward expansion. Both sides sought Native American alliances to help fight for the territory. The British formed an alliance with the Iroquois Confederacy while the French allied with tribes like the Huron. The war turned in Britain's favor after William Pitt became Secretary of War and generals like Wolfe captured key sites such as Quebec. The 1763 Treaty of Paris ended the war, ceding French North American territories to Britain.
John Adams notes
Washington warned against the dangers of political parties and permanent foreign alliances in his farewell address. During Adams' presidency, conflict arose between America and France. Adams sent envoys to France who were demanded bribes by French foreign minister Talleyrand's agents, angering Americans. In response, Congress authorized naval attacks on France. The Federalists also passed several controversial laws, including the Alien and Sedition Acts, leading to a debate over states' rights and growing opposition to the Federalist party.
The spirit of reform notes
This document provides information about various 19th century reform movements in the United States, including religion and reform, temperance, education reform, prison reform, abolitionism, the Underground Railroad, and reform for women's rights. Key figures discussed include Horace Mann, Elizabeth Fry, William Lloyd Garrison, Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, Lucretia Mott, and Susan B. Anthony. The document poses questions about these reform efforts and the people involved to encourage learning about social changes during this period in American history.
The monroe presidency
This document provides information about key events and policies during the Monroe Presidency, including the Convention of 1818, Adams-Onis Treaty, and Monroe Doctrine. The Convention of 1818 established the 49th parallel as the border between British North America and the US in the Oregon Territory. The Adams-Onis Treaty defined the border of the Louisiana Purchase and ceded Florida from Spain to the US. Finally, the Monroe Doctrine stated that further European colonization in the Americas would be seen as hostile acts and helped define the US sphere of influence in the Western Hemisphere.
Jamestown Guided Notes
The document provides background information on the motivations and early history of the English colonization of Jamestown, Virginia in the early 1600s. It details how Jamestown was founded by the Virginia Company, a joint-stock company, on the James River in 1607. It discusses some of the hardships faced by the settlers, the contributions of figures like John Smith, John Rolfe, and Pocahontas, the transition to a royal colony, and events like Bacon's Rebellion. The document appears to be classroom notes or a reading guide for students to learn about the founding and early decades of the Jamestown colony.
Colonial Documents Analysis Chart
The document discusses colonial self-government through analyzing primary sources from the colonial era. It provides a table for students to fill out describing documents that impacted the development of colonial self-government along with relevant quotes to support the analysis. In fewer than 3 sentences, this summary highlights the purpose and structure of the document.
The pre civil war south guided notes
The document summarizes life in the pre-Civil War South. It discusses the expansion of cotton plantation agriculture throughout the Deep South, fueled by the growth of slavery and the invention of the cotton gin. This led to a booming domestic slave trade and an economy dependent on cotton exports. The majority of whites owned small farms, while a minority of large plantation owners controlled much of the wealth and politics through slave ownership. Enslaved African Americans faced brutal conditions under slave codes but maintained their own family structures, religions, and cultural traditions in the face of oppression.
French Settlements- Guided Notes
This document contains guided notes about French settlements in North America. It includes questions about French exploration of the Mississippi River by Joliet and Marquette, the founding of Louisiana, relations with Native Americans, and the contributions of Huguenot settlers. The notes focus on key events and people involved in establishing French colonies and trade networks in North America in the 17th and 18th centuries.
The First President- Guided Notes
This document contains guided notes on the presidency of George Washington. It discusses key decisions Washington made and their impact on future presidencies. It also summarizes Washington's cabinet members, the establishment of the federal court system, and economic challenges faced by Alexander Hamilton as Secretary of the Treasury. The document notes debates around Hamilton's financial plans and the opposition of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison to a national bank.
The John Marshall Supreme Court
John Marshall was appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court by President John Adams in 1801, but his appointment was controversial as the incoming president was Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republican party, which was wary of federal power and the judiciary. As Chief Justice, Marshall established the Supreme Court's authority of judicial review in the 1803 case Marbury v. Madison, allowing it to strike down laws as unconstitutional.
War of 1812
The War of 1812 was sparked by British interference with American trade and impressment of American sailors. It led to increased anti-British sentiment in the early 1800s. The US faced many challenges as its army was small and unprepared. While the US navy saw some successes, the British launched attacks on Washington DC and Baltimore. A key turning point was the American victory at Plattsburgh that convinced the British the war was no longer worthwhile. The war ended in 1814 with the Treaty of Ghent, though the Battle of New Orleans solidified American nationalism after the war.
Westward expansion after the civil war
1. After the original California Gold Rush, gold was discovered in other western states and territories like Colorado, spurring mining booms. Mining became a large industry and mining companies started to form instead of individual miners working alone.
2. The successful mining towns that sprang up were called "boom towns" but many became deserted "ghost towns" once the gold or silver played out. Railroad transportation was important for the mining industry and the government encouraged railroad expansion by giving land grants.
3. The transcontinental railroad was completed in 1869 where the Union Pacific and Central Pacific tracks met at Promontory Summit in Utah. Its completion was celebrated by California governor Leland Stanford driving a golden spike.
Extension Activity- First Great Awakening
This document summarizes excerpts from treatises written by Rev. Jonathan Edwards and Rev. Charles Chauncy regarding the Great Awakening revival movement of the 1740s. Edwards, a "New Light," praised the emotional preaching style of revivalists like George Whitefield and their ability to touch people's hearts. He argued preaching should appeal to both reason and emotion. Chauncy, an "Old Light," criticized itinerant preaching and saw revivalism as detrimental theater that undermined clergy authority and church order. The document provides context for differing views on an influential religious movement in colonial America.
First Great Awakening Guided Notes
The document provides guided notes about the First Great Awakening, a religious revival movement in American Protestantism that took place in the 18th century. Some key figures mentioned include Jonathan Edwards, who preached the first sermon of the Great Awakening; George Whitefield, a traveling evangelist who preached in every colony; and John and Charles Wesley, who started the Methodist movement and ministered in American colonies. The Great Awakening also involved debates between Calvinists and Arminians over the idea of predestination.
Principles of the Constitution
The document discusses several important principles established in the US Constitution, including separation of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches; checks and balances between the branches; federalism which shares power between the federal and state governments; and the Bill of Rights which protects individual liberties and rights.
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Federalists vs antifederalist notes
Please answer the following questions, in your own words. Pretend yo.docx
Please answer the following questions, in your own words. Pretend you are writing for someone who knows something about business but nothing about law.
Remember: This is an individual assignment. You may NOT use anyone else’s thoughts or words in answering the questions. Papers will be run through Turnitin. Transgressions of this rule will be treated as honor violations.
Remember: Transgressions of this rule will be treated as honor violations. Papers will be analyzed by Turnitin. Your answer to each of the questions should be roughly 1 page, double spaced.:- 12 questions, double space
1.
Cite actual language from the U. S. Constitution to demonstrate three
different
and
specific
ways in which the Constitution creates “a more perfect market”
(though NOT intellectual property, see below). Explain why these clauses do in fact create a better market.
2.
Go online and find the 20 least populous states. Add up their populations. What % of the total U S Population do these 20 states account for? What % of the U S Population does the state of California account for? It takes 40 Senators to sustain a “filibuster.” With all this in mind: a) define filibuster, as it is currently used in the U S Senate (you will need to look this up), b) describe how the Senate “2-seat” rule plus the filibuster affects the balance of power between the states, c) identify those industries that you think would be favored by this arrangement d) comment on whether or not the Senate a democratic institution.
3.
Please consider the 10th Amendment. Restate it in plain, modern English. How does this amendment comport with the historical fact that the Constitution was “ratified” by the 13 “states”? Do you believe that the 10
th
Amendment is still honored by the U. S. Government? Why or why not?
4.
Please read the following clause from Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution:
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
Why is this clause important to the practice of business in the USA? Give examples and be specific. Since this course is about Law, Business, and Society, please explain who wins - and who loses - when the “limited Times” referred to above are extended too long. Cite some examples to illustrate your ideas.
5.
Argue pro or con to the following assertion: Due to advances in technology, we the people no longer have “4
th
Amendment rights” against unreasonable search and seizure.
Use readings and cases from the course to support your position.
6.
a) In simple English, describe the process required to amend the U S Constitution. Again, there is that word “ratify.” Why must amendments be ratified?
B) In class, we said that one could get a sense of U. S. history by examining a timeline of the Amendments to the Constitution, and their dates of ratification. Choose one “Amendment driven” period in U S Histor.
Assignment #1Voting and Voter TurnoutVoting and Voter Turnout.docx
Assignment #1
Voting and Voter Turnout
Voting and Voter Turnout
Prepare:
Prior to completing this discussion question, review Chapters 9 and 10 in
American Government
and the following articles: “
How Voter ID Laws Are Being Used to Disenfranchise Minorities and the Poor
,” “
Fraught with Fraud
,” and “
Proof at the Polls
.”
Reflect:
The U.S. has one of the lowest voter turnout rates among modern democratic political systems. One study ranks the U.S. 120th on a list of 169 nations compared on voter turnout (Pintor, Gratschew, & Sullivan, 2002). During the last decade, many initiatives have been undertaken to increase voter participation, yet concerns about the possibility of election fraud have also increased. Additionally, some political interests feel threatened by the increase in turnout among some traditionally low-turnout ethnic minorities. Several states have recently passed legislation imposing new registration and identification requirements. This has sparked debate about whether these are tactics intended to suppress turnout or to prevent fraud.
Write:
In your initial post, summarize recent developments in several states enacting voter ID laws. Analyze and describe the pros and cons on
both sides
of the debate about these laws. Is voter fraud a major problem for our democracy or are some groups trying to make it harder for some segments of society to vote? Draw your own conclusion about the debate over voter ID laws. Justify your conclusions with facts and persuasive reasoning.
Fully respond to all parts of the question and write your response in your own words. Your initial post must be 200 to 250 words. Support your position with APA citations from
two
or more of the assigned resources required for this discussion. Please be sure that you demonstrate understanding of these resources, integrate them into your argument, and cite them properly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignment # 2
Week Five Reflection
Week Five Reflection
Prepare:
Prior to beginning your reflection, review all course readings and videos as required.
Reflect:
The U.S. national government is based on the framework detailed in the U.S. Constitution. The process that the Founding Fathers used to map out our national government is fascinating and illuminating. The Constitution creates a system of checks and balances and separation of powers that have been focal points for class discussions. In addition, the Constitution identifies three main branches for the national government: the legislative, executive, and judicial, which are tasked, respectively, with the creation of the legislation to guide the country, the implementation and execution of that legislation, and the review of that legislation for constitutionality and legality. Interacting with the federal government includes a variety of different actors and political processes such a.
Nursing Essay Examples
Nursing Essay Samples Free — Informative essay on nurses. Nursing Essay Example. Being A Student Nursing Essay Examples | Sitedoct.org. Essay for Nursing - Introduction: In this essay, the role of a nurse in .... Sample Nursing School Essays. Nursing Essay: Nursing application essay sample. Nurse Practitioner Essay — Family nurse practitioner grad school essay. Nursing essay writing service at $7page essaypro Elwood. 004 Sample Nursing Admission Essay School Samples Nurse Practitioner .... Nursing Essay Samples Free : Searching For Free Reflective Essay ....
The Constitution grants many different powers to the.docx
The document discusses several topics related to US government and politics:
It first discusses the different types of presidential powers granted by the Constitution, and asks which two expressed powers would be most essential for a president to do their job.
It then defines political values and ideologies, comparing and contrasting the two concepts. It describes the main characteristics of liberalism and conservatism in the US in terms of core American values.
Next, it discusses different criteria for winning elections, comparing majority vote, plurality vote and proportional vote systems. It asks which would be best for the US Congress.
Finally, it covers voter turnout trends in the US over time, factors influencing turnout, and why turnout
Executive-Legislative ConflictsThe powers of the Executive and Leg.docx
Executive-Legislative Conflicts
The powers of the Executive and Legislative branches of government are outlined in the Constitution and there is some degree of overlap, which ultimately leads to conflict between the two branches. For instance, both the president and the Congress have war powers. According to the Constitution, the president is the “…c ommander in chief of the Army, and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of several states…” (Article 2, Section 2). Therefore, the president has the power to wage war. On the other hand, Congress has the power to declare war and controls funding for wars. Several presidents, including Presidents Truman, Johnson, Clinton, and Bush, have waged war without authorization from Congress, and thus have broken the law. When these and other conflicts arise between the executive and legislative branches of government, it is up to the courts to decide how they should be resolved. To do so, judges reference the Constitution and interpret the meaning of specific provisions when coming to a decision.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review the Constitution in Appendix E in the course text,
Administrative Law and Politics: Cases and Comments.
Consider the powers of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Think about how the executive and legislative powers overlap.
Review the article, “The Use and Abuse of Power: The Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers.” Pay particular attention to the analyses of the
Immigration and Naturalization Service v Chadha
and
Morrison v Olson
cases. Think about the executive-legislative conflicts evident in each case and consider how the Supreme Court resolved the conflicts.
Review the article, “The Supreme Court and the Powers of the Executive: The Adjudication of Foreign Policy.” Focus on the role of the Supreme Court in resolving executive-legislative conflicts related to foreign policy.
Review the article, “Conflicts between the Commander in Chief and Congress: Concurrent Power over the Conduct of War.” Pay particular attention to how the Supreme Court intervened in executive-legislative conflicts regarding war powers.
Using the Walden Library and/or the Internet, research one case discussed in the readings this week, or another of your choosing that involved an executive-legislative conflict.
Consider arguments made by the executive and legislative members and/or groups.
Think about how the Court came to a decision, noting how the Court justified the decision, using Constitutional provisions.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post
by
Day 3
a brief description of the case you selected. Then explain the arguments made by the executive and legislative members and/or groups. Be specific. Finally explain how the Court came to a decision, using specific Constitutional provisions. Again, be specific.
Note:
Identify the case you selected in the first line of your post. You will be asked to respond to a colleague who selected a case that you did not.
Be sur.
It 215 week 7 dq 2
This document discusses several topics related to political science courses, including the four pillars of the US government, judicial review, legislative and executive powers, federalism, religious freedom, and freedom of speech. It provides discussion questions on each topic and asks learners to address aspects like how the pillars support the government, the reasoning behind judicial review, if the Patriot Act infringes on civil liberties, the scope of federal power, and elements of religious freedom. A link is also provided to download additional course tutorials.
Touchstone 1 Case Study Close ReadingASSIGNMENT For this Tou.docx
Touchstone 1: Case Study Close Reading
ASSIGNMENT: For this Touchstone, you will select a case study of a topic in U.S. history source to read like a historian. As you learned, doing a close reading means reading the text multiple times, with a different set of questions in mind each time. You will then write and submit answers to a set of close reading questions:
Origin and context: Who wrote this text? When did they write it? What do I know about the events being discussed?
Meaning: What is the author’s main idea? What is the text generally about?
Argument: What is the author’s point of view? Are they trying to convince the reader of something? What evidence do they use to support their argument?
Skills: Is there evidence in the text of agility or problem solving skills being used? In what way(s)?
This Touchstone provides an opportunity for you to delve more deeply into a topic in U.S. history and practice thinking like a historian. It will also prepare you for later Touchstones, which ask you to research a historical question and create a presentation to help others understand how historical events can be applied to current issues. Lastly, it will develop your problem solving skills, because being a critical reader helps you to obtain and evaluate the information you need to solve problems.
Use the Touchstone template below to write answers to the close reading questions as you read. When you have finished, you will submit this template to move onto the next unit.
Touchstone 1 Template
A. Directions
Select a case study from the list below:
Topic
Case Study Article
Agriculture and Social Change
Commercialization and Discontent on the American Farm: The Farmer's Movements of the Late-19th and Early-20th Centuries
Civil Rights and WWII
The Double Victory Campaign and the Black Press: A Conservative Approach to 'Victory' at Home and Abroad
Civil Rights and Women
Title IX and the Gender Binary: Trajectories of Equality
Media and Communications
The American Military and the Press: From Vietnam to Iraq
Read the case study in its entirety. To enhance your understanding, be sure to look up any terms or events in the text that you may be unfamiliar with. Re-read the text as you answer the close reading questions in the Touchstone template.
Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Origin and context
❒ Have you identified who wrote the text and when? Is he or she qualified to speak on the topic?
❒ Have you identified the events being discussed?
2. Meaning
❒ Have you identified the author’s main idea?
❒ Have you described what the text is generally about?
3. Argument
❒ Have you identified the author’s point of view? Are they trying to convince the reader of something?
❒ Have you identified the evidence used to support the argument?
4. Skills
❒ Have you explained ways in which agility or problem solving skills are being used?
To Prepare.
Term Paper Individual Rights and Social OrderDue Week 10 and wort.docx
Term Paper: Individual Rights and Social Order
Due Week 10 and worth 200 points
Over the course of the term, this course has focused on the concepts of Individual Rights as protected under the Bill of Rights, as well as the role of the legal systems and its unrelenting pursuit of Social Order. Each concept balances the other to ensure that rules, institutions, and public initiatives can be executed in a standardized and judicious manner for the benefit of a civilized society.
Review the following in preparation to follow a systematic approach to your synthesis of law and fact:
Champion, D. J., Hartley, R. D., & Rabe, G.A. (2012). Chapter 1
Law: The Legal Battlefield. In
Criminal courts: Structure, process, and issues
(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Write a ten to fifteen (10-15) page paper in which you:
Explain the difference in individual rights and social order, and examine the major effects of both on the legal system overall.
Choose one (1) of the social controls discussed within Chapter 1, and give your opinion as to the amendment which offers the most protection of the social control that you selected. Address whether the chosen Amendment is simply an instrument of protection to ensure that the rights and liberties of citizens are secure, whether it provides a framework to facilitate citizen / governmental interactions, or both. Explain the answer.
Discuss the essentials ways in which the law effectuates social change in American society through judicial activism. Provide a rationale for the response.
Examine the overall importance of both substantive law and procedural law. Suggest three (3) ways in which these two (2) types of laws can protect both individual rights and social order. Discuss the invaluable aspects of substantive and procedural in keeping the adversarial system in balance while protecting individual rights and social order. Justify the response.
Analyze the key differences between criminal law, civil law, and administrative law. Discuss the role of each when criminal and administrative law or civil and administrative law intersects in the litigation process.Propose two (2) ways in which these three (3) types of laws protect individual rights and social order. Justify the response.
Review the three (3) functions of law. Explain the essential manner in which the law overall ensures the existence of adequate order, provides resolutions to conflicts, and protects civil liberties (e.g., freedom of thought, belief, expression, and assembly; protection against unreasonable searches and seizures; and provisions for a court hearing prior to government taking of property) as set forth in the U.S. Constitution.
Debate whether or not social control(s), as a function of law, play a fundamentally positive/creative role or negative / restrictive role in the development of modern American law. Provide a rationale for the response.
Use at least two (2) quality references.
Note:
Wikipedia and othe.
Constrained PowersIf you have not done so already, you probably ar.docx
Constrained Powers
If you have not done so already, you probably are beginning to realize that the Constitution is somewhat vague in defining the powers of the executive and legislative branches. As a result, there is a lot of room for interpretation. Just as the courts interpret constitutional provisions to come to decisions about conflicts, presidents and Congress also interpret constitutional provisions to determine their breadth of power. In some cases, their interpretation is broad and they overstep their bounds. In such cases, the courts get involved. Sometimes, the courts validate the president’s or Congress’s interpretation of their powers. Other times, the courts constrain their powers. In this week’s readings, you look at several examples in which the courts constrained the powers of the president and Congress.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review the Constitution in Appendix E in the course text,
Administrative Law and Politics: Cases & Comments.
Reflect on the powers of the executive and legislative branches.
Review the article, “Nixon's Shadow.” Consider how the courts constrained President Nixon’s executive privilege powers.
Review the article, “Presidential Power and the United States Supreme Court.” Reflect on how presidential power is limited by the Supreme Court.
Review the article, “
Clinton v Jones
: The Supreme Court Refuses to Expand the Doctrine of Presidential Immunity to Encompass a President’s Unofficial Acts.” Consider the Supreme Court’s decision regarding the Doctrine of Presidential Immunity.
Review the article, “Congressional Alternatives in the Wake of
City of Borne v Flores
: The (Limited) Role of Congress in Protecting Religious Freedom from State and Local Infringement.” Think about how the Supreme Court limited the power of Congress in the
City of Borne v Flores
.
Review the article, “Constitutional Law–Supreme Court Invalidates Federal Gun-Free Zones Act.” Reflect on how the Supreme Court’s decision constrained the power of Congress under the Commerce Clause.
Using the Walden Library and the Internet, research one case discussed in the readings this week, or another of your choosing, in which the courts constrained the power of Congress or the president.
Consider arguments made by the president or Congress.
Think about how the court came to a decision, noting how the court justified the decision, using constitutional provisions.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post
by
Day 4
a brief description of the case you selected. Then, explain the arguments made by the president or Congress. Be specific. Finally, explain how the court came to a decision, using specific constitutional provisions. Again, be specific.
Note:
Identify the case you selected in the first line of your post. You will be asked to respond to a colleague who selected a case that you did not.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
Read
a selection of your colleagues' postings.
R.
SummaryThe national interest is examined through a constructivi.docx
Summary:
The national interest is examined through a constructivist viewpoint by Weldes, who believes that realist arguments can not accurately explain the actions of the state in international politics. Melde believes that under the realist perspective, the national interest is too vague of a concept for analysts to correctly judge what actions a statesmen should take.In the realist perspective, the national interest also has the fault of the analyst being unaware of what the “national interest” truly is, since it is up to interpretation. Weldes’ constructivist approach claims that national interest are social constructs created by the state to understand their position with respect to the other states. The state creates these constructs to have a better understanding of what their goals are and the obstacles that may appear in the form of other states or other organizations. The social constructs are created as a way to have an understanding of the surroundings of the state. These surroundings can be identified as other states, non-state organizations, social movements, etc. They are then described in relation to their impact to the state, like being a threat, an ally, or neutral.
Key Terms:
National interest: helps to identify what is important in international politics and to legitimize the actions taken by the state in foreign affairs
“Security dilemma”: states remain in inevitable and perpetual competition without the existence of the supra-state
Quasi-causal: not focused on accurate cause and effect; relies on patterns that can be easily noticed and justified
Domino theory: cold war belief that having one state fall to communism will lead to surrounding states following the first one
Articulation: using keywords from the language to attribute to political situations and events; a catchphrase for political terms
Interpellation: generating recognition and identification; creating a national identity to give illusion of unified state towards a common goal
Individuals:
Steve Smith: “the national interest” is a malleable term that can be used to the advantage of any state that uses it as a defense for their actions
Hans Morgenthau: “the national interest” is a term that can be considered the focus of the states’ actions in international politics
Alexander Wendt: uses constructivist perspective; the interpretations of interests and objects dictate how the state will react to different situations, so national interest will have a fixed meaning with boundaries in place that are different from the situations of other states
Week Five Learning Outcomes
This week students will:
1. Analyze collective bargaining processes and the major factors of contract negotiation.
2. Evaluate hazardous conditions and compliance issues.
Readings
Read the following chapters in: A Framework for Human Resource Management:
1. Chapter 9: Managing Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining
2. Chapter 10: Protecting Safety and Health
Discussions
To partici ...
Pol 201 assignments for dowload
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2977/Habeas-Corpus-and-the-War-on-Terror-POL201-DQ-1-American-National-Government-Week-5-POL201-DQ-Week-5
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2976/Habeas-Corpus-and-the-War-on-Terror-POL201-DQ-1-American-National-Government-Week-5-POL201-DQ-Week-5
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2975/Party-Platforms-and-Winning-Elections-POL201-DQ-1-American-National-Government-Week-5-POL201-DQ-Week-5
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2974/The-Supreme-Court-and-Judicial-Review-POL201-DQ-2-American-National-Government-Week-4-POL201-DQ-Week-4
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2973/Habeas-Corpus-and-the-War-on-Terror-POL201-DQ-2-American-National-Government-Week-4-POL201-DQ-Week-4
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2972/Defense-Spending-and-the-MilitaryIndustrial-Complex-POL201-DQ-2-American-National-Government-Week-3
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2971/Presidential-Leadership-and-the-Electoral-College-POL201-DQ-1-American-National-Government-POL201-DQ-1-Week-3
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2970/Meet-Your-Rep-POL201-DQ-2-American-National-Government-Week-2
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2969/Policymaking-in-the-Federal-System-POL201-DQ-1-American-National-Government-Week-2
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2968/Amending-the-US-Constitution-POL201-DQ-2-American-National-Government
http://myessaybank.com/paper/id/2967/Separation-of-PowersChecks-and-Balances-POL201-DQ-1-American-National-Government
WEEK 1 DISCUSSION 1
For much of 2011 and 2012, public dissatisfaction with Congress rose to all time highs, with 70-80% expressing disapproval with how Congress does its job. Many commentators note that Americans are fed up with Washington "grid-lock" that makes government apparently unable to address important problems. Other observers believe that the national government is acting according to its design, based on separation of powers and checks and balances.
Before writing your initial post, review the assigned resources. To easily access the resources from the Ashford University Library, please see the table located in the Course Materials section.
In your initial post of at least 200-250 words, analyze how the U.S. Constitution implements separation of powers and checks and balances. Briefly explain why the constitutional framers based the new government on these ideas. Evaluate how separation of powers and checks and balances are working out in practice, today, justifying your assessment with persuasive reasoning and examples.
Fully respond to all parts of the question. Write in your own words. Support your position with APA citations to two or more of the assigned resources required for this discussion. Please be sure that you demonstrate understanding of these resources, integrate them into your argument, and cite them properly.
By Day 7, respond to at least two of your classmates' initial posts. Your peer responses each must be at least 75 words. They must demonstrate critical thinking (e.g., ask a relevant question
Pol 303 the american constitution entire course
This document provides an overview of the entire POL 303 The American Constitution course from Ashford University. It includes descriptions of weekly discussion questions and assignments that focus on various topics related to the US Constitution, such as the four pillars of government, judicial review, legislative and executive powers, federalism, civil rights, religious freedom, and privacy rights. The document concludes with details about the final research paper assignment, which requires students to analyze a current constitutional issue and discuss its implications for federalism, civil rights, and civil liberties.
1. Write a 1-2 page (single spaced, 11 pt font) narrativediscussi
1. Write a 1-2 page (single spaced, 11 pt font) narrative/discussion for the organism you identified in this project.(see below) This narrative describing your fictional future patient should focus on the medical relevance of each organism, such as virulence factors and the type of infections caused, treatments provided and patient outcome. you MUST use in-line citations for this portion.
Identified organism: Enterobacter aerogenes
2. Including a Cover Page, and provide a bibliography that you reference in your in-text citations. Citations MUST be in either APA or MLA format. You need a minimum of five references for the organism you choose to write about. Only ONE of them can be your book OR Wikipedia. Use peer-reviewed scientific articles for your other four articles (A publication that contains original articles that have been written by scientists and evaluated for technical and scientific quality and correctness by other experts in the same field).
The Discussion:
You are a healthcare worker, working in your chosen profession! Congratulations! You did it!!! BUT.......one of your patients has become infected with the type of organism that you have identified in this project (Enterobacter aerogenes). Describe the symptoms they exhibit. What tests did you (or the doctor) do to determine what organism it was? What medications or therapy did the patient receive? What was the outcome of their illness? Use the library reference databases (or library) to research your organism and use in-text citations to illustrate how you used your research in your narrative.
Savannah Carter
April 17, 2022
HLTH2302 Z03
Research Assignment
Topic: Substance Abuse
I picked substance abuse for my topic because this is an interesting topic. People are dying from this every day, and I would like to get an insight into what's transpiring. I would like to learn about different substances that may be used during this time and see how medicine plays a part in the abuse. I have a few family members who do this, and I want to learn what keeps them addicted also.
Articles:
https://drugabusestatistics.org/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177685/
https://www.foxnews.com/category/health/mental-health/drug-and-substance-abuse
https://www.cdc.gov/stopoverdose/fentanyl/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28982092/
4/30/22, 12:40 AM Outline
https://www.austincc.edu/tmthomas/sample outline 1.htm 1/5
4/30/22, 12:40 AM Outline
https://www.austincc.edu/tmthomas/sample outline 1.htm 2/5
Writing an Outline
An outline is a “blueprint” or “plan” for your paper. It helps you to organize your thoughts an
arguments. A good outline can make conducting research and then writing the paper ver
efficient. Your outline page must include your:
Paper Title
Thesis statement
Major points/arguments indicated by Roman numerals (i.e., I, II, III, IV, V, etc.)
Support for your major points, indicated by capital Arabic num ...
1. Write a 1-2 page (single spaced, 11 pt font) narrativediscussi
1. Write a 1-2 page (single spaced, 11 pt font) narrative/discussion for the organism you identified in this project.(see below) This narrative describing your fictional future patient should focus on the medical relevance of each organism, such as virulence factors and the type of infections caused, treatments provided and patient outcome. you MUST use in-line citations for this portion.
Identified organism: Enterobacter aerogenes
2. Including a Cover Page, and provide a bibliography that you reference in your in-text citations. Citations MUST be in either APA or MLA format. You need a minimum of five references for the organism you choose to write about. Only ONE of them can be your book OR Wikipedia. Use peer-reviewed scientific articles for your other four articles (A publication that contains original articles that have been written by scientists and evaluated for technical and scientific quality and correctness by other experts in the same field).
The Discussion:
You are a healthcare worker, working in your chosen profession! Congratulations! You did it!!! BUT.......one of your patients has become infected with the type of organism that you have identified in this project (Enterobacter aerogenes). Describe the symptoms they exhibit. What tests did you (or the doctor) do to determine what organism it was? What medications or therapy did the patient receive? What was the outcome of their illness? Use the library reference databases (or library) to research your organism and use in-text citations to illustrate how you used your research in your narrative.
Savannah Carter
April 17, 2022
HLTH2302 Z03
Research Assignment
Topic: Substance Abuse
I picked substance abuse for my topic because this is an interesting topic. People are dying from this every day, and I would like to get an insight into what's transpiring. I would like to learn about different substances that may be used during this time and see how medicine plays a part in the abuse. I have a few family members who do this, and I want to learn what keeps them addicted also.
Articles:
https://drugabusestatistics.org/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177685/
https://www.foxnews.com/category/health/mental-health/drug-and-substance-abuse
https://www.cdc.gov/stopoverdose/fentanyl/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28982092/
4/30/22, 12:40 AM Outline
https://www.austincc.edu/tmthomas/sample outline 1.htm 1/5
4/30/22, 12:40 AM Outline
https://www.austincc.edu/tmthomas/sample outline 1.htm 2/5
Writing an Outline
An outline is a “blueprint” or “plan” for your paper. It helps you to organize your thoughts an
arguments. A good outline can make conducting research and then writing the paper ver
efficient. Your outline page must include your:
Paper Title
Thesis statement
Major points/arguments indicated by Roman numerals (i.e., I, II, III, IV, V, etc.)
Support for your major points, indicated by capital Arabic num ...
HIS 100 Topic Exploration WorksheetPart 1Select a research t.docx
HIS 100 Topic Exploration Worksheet
Part 1
Select a research topic area for Project 1 based on which of the following areas interests you the most. You will explore the selected topic a little later in this theme. Mark your selection in the right-hand column.
Topic
Selection
Drafting of the U.S. Constitution
x
Mao Zedong’s Rule Over China
South African Apartheid
Choose Your Own Topic (insert pre-approved topic here)
In the space below, replace the bracketed text with a short paragraph about what you already knew prior to this course about the topic you selected, based on your personal history or experiences. This may include assumptions, beliefs, or values related to the topic. Be as detailed as possible.
The drafting of the U.S. Constitution began on 5/25/1787 when the Constitutional Convention met for the first time in Pennsylvania. The Convention ended on 9/17/1787. The Constitution was made of seven articles, twenty-seven amendments, and the major Principles of Government embodied in the Constitution. It is signed eleven years after the Declaration of Independence. It is not one of the founding documents of America. This important document guaranteed basic rights for every citizen. One of the most remembered amendments is the thirteenth due to the abolish of slavery.
Part 2
Now that you have identified your topic and described what you already know about the topic, what questions do you still have about the topic? Replace the bracketed text with your answers.
Question
Response
Identify one question about the topic that you are curious about.
Why was the Constitution written?
Describe why this question matters to you personally.
It affects my right of freedom of speech and the right to vote. I can go to any church I choose. I can also own a firearm.
Describe why this question matters to society.
It dived power among the government and the states.
Identify a second question about the topic you are curious about.
Should the President of the United States have absolute power?
Describe why this question matters to you personally.
This would matters to me personally because if the President has complete control then he would have control over our electronic communications; including financial records.
Describe why this question matters to society.
The U.S. is in Danger. Insufficient government. Institutional reform is the challenge and the nation’s success in meeting it will determine out future as a nation.
Part 3
You are now ready to complete the final part of your Topic Exploration Worksheet. You have chosen a topic, posed some research questions, and are ready to start thinking about what kind of sources you will need to investigate your research questions further. Using the library guide in the Shapiro Library provided for your chosen topic, skim through the suggested resources (or find your own) and replace the bracketed text with relevant information about your research questions.
Question
Response
Which secondary sources woul.
PLSC 102 Term Paper on Political IdeologiesThe purpose of this.docx
PLSC 102 Term Paper on Political Ideologies
The purpose of this assignment, according to Thomas Jefferson:
“Difference of opinion leads to inquiry, and inquiry to truth.”
Check the list on Blackboard to see which issue of the following issues you’ve been assigned.
Illegal Immigration, Stem Cell Research, Affirmative Action, or US Foreign Aid (only non-military aid).
After getting your assigned issue from the list on Blackboard, address the following in at least 6-7 typed pages. You will need to use your lecture notes on the ideological spectrum, and outside research. In addition to books and journals, the following online databases will help you locate opposing views and recent laws/court decisions: Britannica Online, the Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center, ProQuest and LexisNexis (newspaper and newsmagazine searches), and the CQ Researcher. These and other MiraCosta databases can be accessed for free at MCC libraries or at home (using your Surf password). Simply click on “Library” on the MCC website, and then click on “All Online Databases” under “Online Resources.”
You should start your research with your textbooks (check the index), Britannica Online (or another trustworthy encyclopedia), and the Opposing Viewpoints database. Then, after you have a better understanding of your issue, you can move on to other specific sources such as newspaper and journal articles, newsmagazines such as Newsweek and Time, websites for political parties and other sources.
You will need to use at least 8 different sources for your paper other than your course textbooks. At least three of your sources must be something other than websites (i.e articles, books, etc). If you can find a source in print, but you choose to get it online (like a newspaper article from LATimes.com), it does not count as a website source. All sources must be cited in the paper and listed in a separate bibliography (citation format described below).
The paper must be double-spaced, with size 12 Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and your name, class, and date in the header (not in the body of the paper – click View-->Header&Footer). Do not use any cover pages or folders – only a staple in the upper left corner. Your paper must be in essay format (no outlines). Do not include an introduction or conclusion. Points will be deducted for spelling and grammatical errors, and for deviations from the format described below.
Section 1: Describe how contemporary American liberals approach this issue. You will need to provide an objective, unbiased description, so that most liberals would agree with what you have written. Specifically,
a) Describe their beliefs about this issue – are they in favor, opposed? More importantly, what arguments do they give to support their position?
b) Describe the specific changes they propose to address this issue. You will need to research and describe several policies or ideas for reform, including recent laws (state and federa.
POL 201 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.com
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
POL 201 Week 1 DQ 1 The U.S. Constitution
POL 201 Week 1 DQ 2 Week One Reflection
POL 201 Week 1 Learning Activity The Constitution
Part 1 The Bill of RightsExplain why the Anti-federalists p.docx
Part 1: The Bill of Rights:
Explain why the Anti-federalists pushed for the Bill of Rights to be included in the US Constitution. What reasons did they cite as necessary in response to the desire of Federalists to create a strong central government?
Next, explain some of the civil liberties that were included and established individual freedoms for Americans. This website may be helpful:
Bill of Rights of the United State of America (1791)
Finally, explain how the Supreme Court has expanded civil liberties in the U.S. since the creation of the Bill of Rights. Include in your discussion the role of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Explain the balance of power between the individual and the government as interpreted by the Supreme Court and illustrated in the cases within your textbook. Please refer to at least 3 cases. (For example; Gideon vs Wainright, Miranda v Arizona, Lemon v Kurtzman, Engel vs Vitale, Texas vs Johnson, Griswold v Connecticut and Roe v Wade.)
Part 2: Analyze these civil liberties in two important areas of controversy today.
First, as it pertains to national security, analyze the pros and cons of expanding government surveillance and give me your verdict on whether we should decrease civil liberties in the name of national security.
Next, when it comes to freedom of speech, do you believe the free speech clause of the US Constitution grants corporations the right to unlimited campaign contributions to politicians? Analyze the pros and cons.
Your essay should be between 500 and 600 words, double-spaced and in APA format, with parenthetical citations and a Reference List. A cover page is not necessary.
.
Pol 201 Effective Communication-snaptutorial.com
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
POL 201 Week 1 DQ 1 The U.S. Constitution
POL 201 Week 1 DQ 2 Week One Reflection
POL 201 Week 1 Learning Activity The Constitution
POL 201 Week 1 Quiz
POL 201 Week 2 DQ 1 Policy and Your Life
Lesson plan 4 political parties complete
The document outlines the emergence of the first two political parties in the United States - the Federalists and Democratic Republicans. It discusses key differences between the parties on issues like federal vs state power and interpretation of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson emerged as leaders of the opposing parties. The first election in 1796 resulted in John Adams, a Federalist, becoming president while his opponent Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic Republican, became vice president under the electoral process at the time.
Similar to Federalists vs antifederalist notes (20)
Please answer the following questions, in your own words. Pretend yo.docx
Please answer the following questions, in your own words. Pretend yo.docx
Assignment #1Voting and Voter TurnoutVoting and Voter Turnout.docx
Assignment #1Voting and Voter TurnoutVoting and Voter Turnout.docx
The Constitution grants many different powers to the.docx
The Constitution grants many different powers to the.docx
Executive-Legislative ConflictsThe powers of the Executive and Leg.docx
Executive-Legislative ConflictsThe powers of the Executive and Leg.docx
Touchstone 1 Case Study Close ReadingASSIGNMENT For this Tou.docx
Touchstone 1 Case Study Close ReadingASSIGNMENT For this Tou.docx
Term Paper Individual Rights and Social OrderDue Week 10 and wort.docx
Term Paper Individual Rights and Social OrderDue Week 10 and wort.docx
Constrained PowersIf you have not done so already, you probably ar.docx
Constrained PowersIf you have not done so already, you probably ar.docx
SummaryThe national interest is examined through a constructivi.docx
SummaryThe national interest is examined through a constructivi.docx
1. Write a 1-2 page (single spaced, 11 pt font) narrativediscussi
1. Write a 1-2 page (single spaced, 11 pt font) narrativediscussi
1. Write a 1-2 page (single spaced, 11 pt font) narrativediscussi
1. Write a 1-2 page (single spaced, 11 pt font) narrativediscussi
HIS 100 Topic Exploration WorksheetPart 1Select a research t.docx
HIS 100 Topic Exploration WorksheetPart 1Select a research t.docx
PLSC 102 Term Paper on Political IdeologiesThe purpose of this.docx
PLSC 102 Term Paper on Political IdeologiesThe purpose of this.docx
Part 1 The Bill of RightsExplain why the Anti-federalists p.docx
Part 1 The Bill of RightsExplain why the Anti-federalists p.docx
More from Blake Harris
Westward expansion after the civil war
Westward expansion transformed America after the Civil War through mining, railroads, cattle ranching, and homesteading. The transcontinental railroad connected the country, while mining for gold and other metals led to boomtowns. Cattle drives and cowboys supported the beef industry. The Homestead Act encouraged settlement of the Great Plains, though conflicts arose with Native Americans over land. Native Americans faced difficulties on reservations and conflicts like the Battle of Little Bighorn and Wounded Knee massacre.
Reconstruction notes
The document contains notes from an 8th grade social studies class on Reconstruction. It includes questions about key events, people, laws, and amendments from the Reconstruction era, such as the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments, Lincoln's and Johnson's Reconstruction plans, the Freedman's Bureau, Black Codes, and Jim Crow laws. Students are asked to fill out charts comparing Reconstruction plans, define terms, and explain the significance of events like Johnson's impeachment trial and the 1876 presidential election.
Reconstruction
The document provides information about Reconstruction following the U.S. Civil War, including key events and policies. It discusses the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments and their effects. Lincoln's 10% Plan for Reconstruction is compared to the more radical Wade-Davis Bill. Andrew Johnson's more lenient reconstruction plans are outlined and his conflict with Radical Republicans discussed. The rise of groups like the Ku Klux Klan and policies like the Black Codes and Jim Crow laws are summarized.
Battles of the civil war notes
The document provides details about major battles of the Civil War including questions about key details like the first major battle (First Battle of Bull Run), key generals who became famous after certain battles (Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson after First Bull Run), and strategies employed at important battles like Grant's strategy to capture Vicksburg which completed Union control of the Mississippi River. It concludes with details on Sherman's "March to the Sea" strategy of total war to break the Confederacy and questions about the strategies used by Grant to finally convince Lee to surrender at Appomattox Court House.
Civil war Leaders presentation
Tennessee played an important but divided role in the Civil War. It was the last Confederate state to secede due to divisions between its eastern, western, and middle regions. Several key figures influenced the course of the war, including Confederate president Jefferson Davis and generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, as well as Union admiral David Farragut and politicians William Brownlow and Nathan Bedford Forrest of Tennessee. African American regiments like the 54th Massachusetts and 13th United States Colored Troops from Tennessee played significant roles despite facing prejudice.
Tn during the civil war, leaders of the civil war
This document contains a series of questions about leaders and events during the American Civil War. It asks about which state seceded last, Tennessee's reasons for seceding, and the roles of key figures like Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee, and Ulysses S. Grant. It also asks about the contributions of minority regiments like the Massachusetts 54th and the 13th Colored Troops division. Important battles mentioned include the First Battle of Bull Run.
Civil War Battles and Events
The North had several advantages over the South during the Civil War. The North had a larger population and more industrial capabilities, allowing it to better support its army. It also controlled the seas, cutting off international trade from the South. While the South had early battlefield successes, the North's greater resources and manpower allowed it to win increasingly important battles and wear down the South over time.
Toward civil war guided notes
1. The document contains guided notes on the events leading up to the Civil War, including debates over slavery in new territories, the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Dred Scott decision, and the Lincoln-Douglas debates.
2. Key events summarized are the formation of the Republican Party in response to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Chief Justice Taney's ruling in Dred Scott that denied citizenship to African Americans, and abolitionist John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry which intensified sectional tensions.
3. The notes are intended to help students understand the differing views on slavery that emerged and escalated conflicts in the years leading up to the Civil War.
Toward civil war
The document summarizes key events leading up to the American Civil War, including debates over slavery in new territories gained from Mexico, the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Dred Scott decision, and the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Tensions increased as the North and South disagreed over the expansion of slavery. The Missouri Compromise was replaced by popular sovereignty under the Kansas-Nebraska Act, fueling conflict in Kansas between pro- and anti-slavery settlers. The Supreme Court's ruling in Dred Scott denied citizenship to African Americans and found that Congress could not regulate slavery. Lincoln and Douglas debated these issues during their 1858 Senate campaign, further dividing the nation along sectional lines.
The pre civil war south ppt
The South's economy was based almost entirely on agriculture, especially cotton, grown with slave labor. The Deep South states relied heavily on cotton, rice and sugarcane plantations. Eli Whitney's invention of the cotton gin in 1793 boosted cotton production and the demand for slaves. Most Southern whites were small farmers while a minority owned large plantations with many slaves. The rural poor lived in poverty. African Americans preserved elements of their culture while also experiencing oppression through slave codes. Nat Turner's rebellion in 1831 was an example of slave resistance, though violent revolts were rare. Southern cities developed along waterways and railroads.
The spirit of reform
The document summarizes various social reform movements that took place in the United States during the 1800s, including:
1. The temperance movement sought to ban alcohol, led by Lyman Beecher.
2. Education reform aimed to improve schools and was led by Horace Mann, who influenced the creation of normal schools to train teachers.
3. Prison reform, led by Dorothea Dix, brought attention to poor prison conditions and the incarceration of the mentally ill.
4. The abolition movement gradually grew from societies seeking a gradual end to slavery to immediate abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass. Notable abolitionists included Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman,
Manifest destiny ppt
1) The document discusses the concept of Manifest Destiny and how it led Americans to settle the West coast, specifically in Oregon and California. It describes how mountain men, fur trappers, and settlers on the Oregon Trail contributed to the development of these territories.
2) It then explains how the Mexican War allowed the U.S. to acquire much of the American Southwest, including Texas, New Mexico, California and Utah. The 1848 California Gold Rush spurred massive migration to the region.
3) Other groups like the Mormons also migrated West, establishing settlements in Utah to escape religious persecution they faced elsewhere.
Manifest destiny guided notes
This document provides guided notes on Manifest Destiny and the westward expansion of the United States in the 1800s. It covers topics like mountain men exploring the Oregon Territory, the influx of American settlers in Texas which caused tensions with Mexico, the Texas War for Independence including the battles of the Alamo and San Jacinto, US acquisition of territories following the Mexican-American War including the California Gold Rush, and the Mormon migration. The notes include questions about events, people, and concepts related to this period of US territorial growth and the doctrine of Manifest Destiny.
The Age of Jackson
Andrew Jackson's presidency influenced the spread of American democracy in several ways:
1) Jackson expanded voting rights and portrayed himself as a champion of the common man, though voting was still limited to white men.
2) He implemented the "spoils system" of replacing government workers with his political supporters.
3) Jackson aggressively pursued the forced removal of Native American tribes, most notoriously the Cherokee Trail of Tears, to open more land for white settlement.
Immigration and the rise of cities 8.47
The document discusses factors that led to increased immigration to America in the 19th century. Mass potato crop failures in Ireland caused a famine that killed 750,000 people and led 2 million Irish to immigrate to the US, settling mostly in northeast cities due to poverty. Between 1845-1855, economic hardship and unrest caused nearly 1 million Germans to immigrate, many able to settle in midwest farmland. However, immigrants faced hostility from nativist groups who believed Americans' needs should come first and that immigrants were threats politically and to American culture. Nativists formed groups like the Know Nothing Party and in some cities, anti-Catholic riots broke out against Irish and German immigrants.
Henry clay’s american system notes
Henry Clay proposed the American System to strengthen the national economy through three means: a protective tariff to protect American industries, a national bank to establish a uniform currency, and federal funding of infrastructure projects. The goals were to improve transportation, encourage domestic manufacturing, and use tariff revenues to fund internal improvements like roads and canals to better connect the sections of the country. However, the tariff was controversial as it raised prices for Southern farmers and angered them.
Henry clay's american system
Henry Clay proposed the American System, which aimed to promote economic development across all sections of the United States. The American System included protective tariffs to encourage domestic manufacturing, a national bank to stabilize the currency, and federal funding for internal improvements like roads, canals, and railroads to facilitate transportation and commerce. While the American System helped modernize the nation's infrastructure and economy, it also exacerbated sectional tensions between the industrial North and agricultural South by benefiting some regions more than others.
Transportation and trade in the early 1800's
The document discusses transportation and trade development in early 1800s America. It describes how private turnpike companies first built roads, and then Congress approved construction of the National Road to connect the east and west. It also discusses the advantages of river travel via steamboats, but rivers did not connect all regions, so a canal was built to link the Hudson River to Lake Erie (the Erie Canal). The canal opened in 1825 and greatly expanded trade by lowering shipping costs. Canals and roads helped America grow its economy in the early 19th century by facilitating transportation of goods and people.
Transportation and trade in the early 1800’s
Private companies helped develop early transportation routes in the US. Congress created the National Road to connect the east and west coasts, linking major rivers like the Ohio River. Travel by river had advantages like being cheaper than land routes, but also disadvantages like being reliant on water levels. The steamboat innovations of Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston revolutionized river travel by making it faster and more reliable. Canals were built to connect waterways like the Hudson River and Lake Erie via the Erie Canal. This increased trade and immigration.
More from Blake Harris (20)
Recently uploaded
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...
Librarians are leading the way in creating future-ready citizens – now we need to update our spaces to match. In this session, attendees will get inspiration for transforming their library spaces. You’ll learn how to survey students and patrons, create a focus group, and use design thinking to brainstorm ideas for your space. We’ll discuss budget friendly ways to change your space as well as how to find funding. No matter where you’re at, you’ll find ideas for reimagining your space in this session.
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/qhtvq32h4ybf9t49ku85x0n3xl4jhr15Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdBeyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Physical pharmaceutics notes for B.pharm students
The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Recently uploaded (20)
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Federalists vs antifederalist notes
- 1. Federalists vs Anti-Federalists Guided Notes TN Standard 8.32 Bell Ringer: Complete the table below based on what you’ve learned about Federalists and Anti-Federalists Federalists Antifederalists Essential Question: __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. What was the purpose of the Federalist Papers? 2. How did Antifederalists respond to the Federalist Papers?
- 2. Bill of Rights - Read the excerpt below, highlight or underline the writer’s feelings about the need for a Bill of Rights “It has been several times truly remarked, that bills of rights are in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgments of prerogative in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. Such was Magna Carta, obtained by the Barons, sword in hand, from king John...It is evident, therefore, that according to their primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing, and as they retain every thing, they have no need of particular reservations. "We the people of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America." Here is a better recognition of popular rights than volumes of those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our state bills of rights, and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics than in a constitution of government.... I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous.” – Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 84 3. How is Hamilton’s view about a bill of rights different from the Antifederalists’ view? Extension Activity Work with your assigned group to analyze the text about Federalists and Antifederalists. Discuss and record answers for questions 1-7 on a separate sheet of paper. Your answers SHOULD BE DETAILED