The Political Parties Of The Past And Present.Ppt Chs
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•1,807 views
The document compares the historical Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties in early U.S. history, noting their differences around issues like alliances, trade policies, and interpretations of the Constitution. It then discusses some similarities between the parties and outlines some modern positions of the Democratic and Republican parties, such as Democrats supporting stem cell research and affordable healthcare while Republicans support adoption and the death penalty.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Differences of the past ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Federalists vs. Republicans
An indepth study of these two groups with compare and contrast slides as well as practice test questions. Well worth a look for those studying this time period. From a National Hall of Fame Teacher.
Federalists vs. Republicans
This document provides information about the emergence of political parties in the United States following the presidency of George Washington. It introduces the Federalist Party led by Alexander Hamilton and the Republican Party led by Thomas Jefferson. The Federalist Party supported a strong national government focused on manufacturing and business, while the Republican Party advocated for stronger state governments and the interests of farmers. The document uses examples like the Whiskey Rebellion and debates around national infrastructure projects to illustrate the differing views between the two parties.
Federalist v. democratic republican parties
Political differences emerged between Hamilton and the Federalists and Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists supported a strong federal government with loose interpretation of the Constitution and implied powers, while the Democratic-Republicans favored states' rights with strict interpretation. The Federalists appealed to merchants and cities and supported policies like the national bank, excise taxes, and national debt. Meanwhile, the Democratic-Republicans appealed to farmers and the South/West and opposed those policies instead favoring lower tariffs and states paying their own debts. Both parties also differed on foreign relations, with the Federalists favoring Britain and Democratic-Republicans supporting the French Revolution.
Federalists and anti-federalists
The document summarizes the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists following the 1787 Constitutional Convention. The Federalists supported the new Constitution and a strong federal government led by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay. They authored the Federalist Papers to advocate for ratification. The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and powerful central government, preferring stronger state control; they were led by figures like Patrick Henry and published their own critiques.
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Notes
The Federalists, led by figures like James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, supported a stronger central government and ratifying the Constitution as written. The Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson and George Mason, represented farmers and lower classes who wanted more state power and opposed the Constitution without added protections for individual rights like a Bill of Rights. The two sides debated the appropriate balance of federal versus state power.
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalists
The Federalists supported a strong central government while the Antifederalists opposed increased federal power and supported states' rights. The Federalist Papers, written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, argued in favor of ratifying the United States Constitution. They wanted to influence the vote and shape the new government. The Antifederalists worried that a strong federal government could become tyrannical and opposed adding a bill of rights to limit federal power over individuals. Their debates centered on the balance between federal and state authority.
Federalists Vs. Anti Federalists
The document discusses the debate around ratifying the new U.S. Constitution between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported ratification and a strong central government, believing it would protect individual liberties, while the Anti-Federalists opposed ratification and favored state power over a strong central government. Both sides engaged in a public debate through publications like the Federalist Papers, written by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay to support ratification, and the Letter from the Federal Farmer, which outlined rights the Anti-Federalists felt needed protecting.
The federalist era
The document discusses the early Federalist Era in the United States, focusing on the presidencies of Washington and Adams and the conflict between the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties. It describes how Washington established important precedents for the presidency and appointed Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson to his cabinet. Hamilton implemented an economic plan that increased federal power and sparked opposition from Jefferson, leading to the formation of the first political parties. Adams' presidency saw heightened partisan conflicts through acts targeting immigrants and criticism of the administration.
Recommended
Federalists vs. Republicans
An indepth study of these two groups with compare and contrast slides as well as practice test questions. Well worth a look for those studying this time period. From a National Hall of Fame Teacher.
Federalists vs. Republicans
This document provides information about the emergence of political parties in the United States following the presidency of George Washington. It introduces the Federalist Party led by Alexander Hamilton and the Republican Party led by Thomas Jefferson. The Federalist Party supported a strong national government focused on manufacturing and business, while the Republican Party advocated for stronger state governments and the interests of farmers. The document uses examples like the Whiskey Rebellion and debates around national infrastructure projects to illustrate the differing views between the two parties.
Federalist v. democratic republican parties
Political differences emerged between Hamilton and the Federalists and Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists supported a strong federal government with loose interpretation of the Constitution and implied powers, while the Democratic-Republicans favored states' rights with strict interpretation. The Federalists appealed to merchants and cities and supported policies like the national bank, excise taxes, and national debt. Meanwhile, the Democratic-Republicans appealed to farmers and the South/West and opposed those policies instead favoring lower tariffs and states paying their own debts. Both parties also differed on foreign relations, with the Federalists favoring Britain and Democratic-Republicans supporting the French Revolution.
Federalists and anti-federalists
The document summarizes the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists following the 1787 Constitutional Convention. The Federalists supported the new Constitution and a strong federal government led by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay. They authored the Federalist Papers to advocate for ratification. The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and powerful central government, preferring stronger state control; they were led by figures like Patrick Henry and published their own critiques.
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Notes
The Federalists, led by figures like James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, supported a stronger central government and ratifying the Constitution as written. The Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson and George Mason, represented farmers and lower classes who wanted more state power and opposed the Constitution without added protections for individual rights like a Bill of Rights. The two sides debated the appropriate balance of federal versus state power.
Lesson 4 Federalists vs. Anti Federalists
The Federalists supported a strong central government while the Antifederalists opposed increased federal power and supported states' rights. The Federalist Papers, written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, argued in favor of ratifying the United States Constitution. They wanted to influence the vote and shape the new government. The Antifederalists worried that a strong federal government could become tyrannical and opposed adding a bill of rights to limit federal power over individuals. Their debates centered on the balance between federal and state authority.
Federalists Vs. Anti Federalists
The document discusses the debate around ratifying the new U.S. Constitution between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported ratification and a strong central government, believing it would protect individual liberties, while the Anti-Federalists opposed ratification and favored state power over a strong central government. Both sides engaged in a public debate through publications like the Federalist Papers, written by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay to support ratification, and the Letter from the Federal Farmer, which outlined rights the Anti-Federalists felt needed protecting.
The federalist era
The document discusses the early Federalist Era in the United States, focusing on the presidencies of Washington and Adams and the conflict between the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties. It describes how Washington established important precedents for the presidency and appointed Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson to his cabinet. Hamilton implemented an economic plan that increased federal power and sparked opposition from Jefferson, leading to the formation of the first political parties. Adams' presidency saw heightened partisan conflicts through acts targeting immigrants and criticism of the administration.
Federalists vs. anti federalists
The document outlines the key differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the debate over ratifying the US Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed ratifying the Constitution as written and argued that the new national government would be too large and distant, could grow into a tyranny, and gave too much power to the central government and executive branch. Federalists supported ratifying the Constitution and countered that a central government with checks and balances could effectively govern the large nation and would not become a tyranny due to the separation of powers between branches of government.
Lesson plan 4 political parties
Political parties first emerged in the United States as a divide between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson over domestic and foreign policy issues. Hamilton favored a strong federal government, close ties with Britain, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. Jefferson favored states' rights, an agrarian society, and closer ties with France. This divide resulted in the formation of the first American political parties - the Federalist Party led by Hamilton and the Democratic-Republican Party led by Jefferson. John Adams of the Federalist Party became the second President in 1797, while his opponent Thomas Jefferson became Vice President, in an early example of the problems that could arise from the President and Vice President belonging to opposing parties.
Federalists &; anti federalists mini lesson
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the ratification of the US Constitution. The Anti-Federalists wanted a weak central government and strong state governments, fearing a strong central authority would be similar to a monarchy. They opposed the Constitution as originally drafted because it did not include protections for individual liberties. The Federalists argued a strong central government was necessary to govern the nation effectively and represent it externally. They believed the separation of powers built into the Constitution would prevent abuse of authority. In the end, the Federalists agreed to add a Bill of Rights to the Constitution to gain the Anti-Federalists' approval.
Federalists and anti federalists
The document summarizes the key differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists supported a strong central government with powers superior to the states, while Anti-Federalists favored a weak central government with states holding most power. Federalists saw benefits to a growing business-based society and national bank, whereas Anti-Federalists wanted to protect the interests of small farmers and were wary of big business influence. The groups also differed on issues like states' rights, expansion, standing armies, and foreign relations, with Federalists generally favoring a stronger national government and Anti-Federalists wanting to limit federal power.
Federalists vs antifederalists
The document summarizes the key dividing issues between Federalists and Antifederalists during the ratification of the US Constitution:
- Federalists supported a stronger central government, while Antifederalists had concerns about states' rights.
- The Federalist Papers, written anonymously by Federalists, argued that separation of powers and checks and balances would prevent abuse of power by the new government.
- Antifederalists responded by writing their own essays expressing concerns about the need for a bill of rights protecting individual liberties.
- Alexander Hamilton argued in Federalist No. 84 that a bill of rights was unnecessary and potentially dangerous in a constitution founded on popular sovereignty.
The First President
George Washington was elected as the first President of the United States. He faced challenges in establishing the role of the presidency and setting precedents for the new government. Washington appointed the first cabinet, including Thomas Jefferson as Secretary of State and Alexander Hamilton as Secretary of Treasury. Hamilton proposed an ambitious economic plan that was opposed by Southern states. Washington issued the Proclamation of Neutrality to keep America out of conflicts between European nations. He later declined to run for a third term, warning of the dangers of political parties in his farewell address.
Jefferson vs Hamilton
The document summarizes the emergence of the first political parties in the United States - the Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson. It outlines some of the key differences between the parties, including who supported each party (Federalists appealed more to the wealthy and cities, Democratic-Republicans appealed more to farmers and Southerners/Westerners), their views on interpreting the Constitution (Federalists supported a loose interpretation with implied powers while Democratic-Republicans supported a strict interpretation), their views on foreign policy (Federalists wanted alliances with Britain, Democratic-Republicans supported the French Revolution) and economics (Federalists supported a national bank and high tariffs while Democratic-Republicans opposed those
U.S. Government -- Chater 2,Section 5 "Ratifying the Constitution"
The document discusses the ratification of the US Constitution. It describes the two sides, with Federalists favoring ratification as they saw the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, led by figures like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. Anti-Federalists opposed ratification, led by Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, concerned about increased central government power without protections like a bill of rights. The Constitution was narrowly ratified, with key states like Virginia and New York approving it after debates. George Washington was then elected the first US President.
Federalist And Antifederalist
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Antifederalists following the drafting of the US Constitution. The Federalists supported a stronger central government and ratifying the new Constitution. The Antifederalists believed it gave the national government too much power and not enough power to the states. Both sides made arguments in publications like the Federalist Papers and Antifederalist Papers to advocate their positions as the Constitution was debated for ratification.
Hamilton v Jefferson
George Washington was the first president of the United States and established important precedents for the office. The document discusses Washington's service during the Revolutionary War and asks what five questions an essay about his life should answer. It also discusses conflicts between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson that resulted in the emergence of two political parties with differing views on economic policy, foreign policy, and the interpretation of the Constitution.
Federalists v Antifederalists
The Necessary and Proper Clause gave Congress implied powers not specifically enumerated in the Constitution. Federalists supported this "elastic clause" because they favored a loose interpretation allowing the government to adapt, while Antifederalists opposed it fearing expanded abusive government power. Federalists believed a strong central government was necessary, but Antifederalists feared it would undermine state autonomy. Federalists thought checks and balances would protect citizens' rights, but Antifederalists argued only a bill of rights could guarantee these protections.
Federalist papers lesson plan student copy
The document provides background information on the Articles of Confederation, the Constitutional Convention, and the Federalist Papers. It summarizes that the Articles of Confederation created a weak national government, leading states to call the Constitutional Convention to draft a new Constitution. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay wrote the Federalist Papers to advocate for ratifying the new Constitution, addressing concerns around federalism, separation of powers, and creating a republic. It also summarizes opposing views from the Anti-Federalists and how the Bill of Rights was eventually added.
Fedsvs antifeds-121016004637-phpapp01
The document discusses the Federalist and Anti-Federalist positions during the ratification of the US Constitution. The Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government and feared it would ignore individual rights. Notable Anti-Federalists included Patrick Henry and George Mason. The Federalists supported ratifying the Constitution to give the national government more power to function effectively while still protecting state powers. Key Federalists included James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay who authored the Federalist Papers in support of ratification.
Federalist Vs
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the interpretation of the Elastic Clause, or Necessary and Proper Clause, of the US Constitution. Federalists supported a broad interpretation that allowed implied powers, wanting a strong federal government, while Anti-Federalists advocated for a limited federal government with only enumerated powers. The document also notes that the Federalist Papers aimed to influence ratification debates and future constitutional interpretation in favor of the Federalist perspective.
Review Power Point
The document summarizes key aspects of early American government including:
1) The Articles of Confederation provided a weak national government which caused problems and led to calls for changes.
2) In response, the new US Constitution established three branches of government and a system of checks and balances to limit any one branch's power.
3) The first five US Presidents oversaw events like establishing the capital, adding the Bill of Rights, the Louisiana Purchase and War of 1812.
Washington Heads the New Government
Presentation about a few of the things established by the first President of the United States, including a little bit about Alexander Hamilton's economic plans
Anti Federalists(Govt Project)
Anti-Federalists opposed the new US Constitution because they believed it concentrated too much power in the national government and threatened individual liberties. They argued for stronger state governments, direct elections, and term limits to empower common people. While initially against ratifying the Constitution, Anti-Federalists eventually supported it after the Bill of Rights was added to protect individual rights.
Hamilton vs jefferson opposition grudge match
The document describes a debate between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson's differing views on domestic and foreign policies during Washington's presidency. Students are asked to select which political figure they agree with more on several issues through a series of multiple choice questions. These issues include handling national debt, federalism, economic priorities, representation in government, interpreting the Constitution, and foreign policy regarding supporting revolutionaries in other countries. Selecting answers on the left or right side reveals whether the student's views align more closely with Hamilton or Jefferson.
Constitutional convention
The Constitutional Convention was called to address issues with the weak central government under the Articles of Confederation. Delegates debated plans for the new government, including the Virginia Plan which proposed a two-house legislature based on population and the New Jersey Plan which proposed one house with equal state representation. The Great Compromise blended these ideas by creating a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House and two senators per state in the Senate. Additionally, the Three-Fifths Compromise was adopted to determine representation and taxation based on state populations, including counting slaves as three-fifths of a person. The convention also established the executive and judicial branches and a process for electing the president through the Electoral College
Federalists & Republicans
Alexander Hamilton, as Secretary of Treasury, proposed a three-part financial plan to establish the national government's credit and enhance its authority. The plan involved the federal government assuming states' Revolutionary War debts, creating the national Bank of the United States, and implementing tariffs and taxes. While successful, the plan divided those in support of Hamilton's vision of a strong central government and wealthy merchants from Jeffersonian Republicans who favored a decentralized agrarian society. This division led to the emergence of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican political parties.
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
More Related Content
What's hot
Federalists vs. anti federalists
The document outlines the key differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the debate over ratifying the US Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed ratifying the Constitution as written and argued that the new national government would be too large and distant, could grow into a tyranny, and gave too much power to the central government and executive branch. Federalists supported ratifying the Constitution and countered that a central government with checks and balances could effectively govern the large nation and would not become a tyranny due to the separation of powers between branches of government.
Lesson plan 4 political parties
Political parties first emerged in the United States as a divide between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson over domestic and foreign policy issues. Hamilton favored a strong federal government, close ties with Britain, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. Jefferson favored states' rights, an agrarian society, and closer ties with France. This divide resulted in the formation of the first American political parties - the Federalist Party led by Hamilton and the Democratic-Republican Party led by Jefferson. John Adams of the Federalist Party became the second President in 1797, while his opponent Thomas Jefferson became Vice President, in an early example of the problems that could arise from the President and Vice President belonging to opposing parties.
Federalists &; anti federalists mini lesson
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the ratification of the US Constitution. The Anti-Federalists wanted a weak central government and strong state governments, fearing a strong central authority would be similar to a monarchy. They opposed the Constitution as originally drafted because it did not include protections for individual liberties. The Federalists argued a strong central government was necessary to govern the nation effectively and represent it externally. They believed the separation of powers built into the Constitution would prevent abuse of authority. In the end, the Federalists agreed to add a Bill of Rights to the Constitution to gain the Anti-Federalists' approval.
Federalists and anti federalists
The document summarizes the key differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists supported a strong central government with powers superior to the states, while Anti-Federalists favored a weak central government with states holding most power. Federalists saw benefits to a growing business-based society and national bank, whereas Anti-Federalists wanted to protect the interests of small farmers and were wary of big business influence. The groups also differed on issues like states' rights, expansion, standing armies, and foreign relations, with Federalists generally favoring a stronger national government and Anti-Federalists wanting to limit federal power.
Federalists vs antifederalists
The document summarizes the key dividing issues between Federalists and Antifederalists during the ratification of the US Constitution:
- Federalists supported a stronger central government, while Antifederalists had concerns about states' rights.
- The Federalist Papers, written anonymously by Federalists, argued that separation of powers and checks and balances would prevent abuse of power by the new government.
- Antifederalists responded by writing their own essays expressing concerns about the need for a bill of rights protecting individual liberties.
- Alexander Hamilton argued in Federalist No. 84 that a bill of rights was unnecessary and potentially dangerous in a constitution founded on popular sovereignty.
The First President
George Washington was elected as the first President of the United States. He faced challenges in establishing the role of the presidency and setting precedents for the new government. Washington appointed the first cabinet, including Thomas Jefferson as Secretary of State and Alexander Hamilton as Secretary of Treasury. Hamilton proposed an ambitious economic plan that was opposed by Southern states. Washington issued the Proclamation of Neutrality to keep America out of conflicts between European nations. He later declined to run for a third term, warning of the dangers of political parties in his farewell address.
Jefferson vs Hamilton
The document summarizes the emergence of the first political parties in the United States - the Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson. It outlines some of the key differences between the parties, including who supported each party (Federalists appealed more to the wealthy and cities, Democratic-Republicans appealed more to farmers and Southerners/Westerners), their views on interpreting the Constitution (Federalists supported a loose interpretation with implied powers while Democratic-Republicans supported a strict interpretation), their views on foreign policy (Federalists wanted alliances with Britain, Democratic-Republicans supported the French Revolution) and economics (Federalists supported a national bank and high tariffs while Democratic-Republicans opposed those
U.S. Government -- Chater 2,Section 5 "Ratifying the Constitution"
The document discusses the ratification of the US Constitution. It describes the two sides, with Federalists favoring ratification as they saw the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, led by figures like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. Anti-Federalists opposed ratification, led by Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, concerned about increased central government power without protections like a bill of rights. The Constitution was narrowly ratified, with key states like Virginia and New York approving it after debates. George Washington was then elected the first US President.
Federalist And Antifederalist
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Antifederalists following the drafting of the US Constitution. The Federalists supported a stronger central government and ratifying the new Constitution. The Antifederalists believed it gave the national government too much power and not enough power to the states. Both sides made arguments in publications like the Federalist Papers and Antifederalist Papers to advocate their positions as the Constitution was debated for ratification.
Hamilton v Jefferson
George Washington was the first president of the United States and established important precedents for the office. The document discusses Washington's service during the Revolutionary War and asks what five questions an essay about his life should answer. It also discusses conflicts between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson that resulted in the emergence of two political parties with differing views on economic policy, foreign policy, and the interpretation of the Constitution.
Federalists v Antifederalists
The Necessary and Proper Clause gave Congress implied powers not specifically enumerated in the Constitution. Federalists supported this "elastic clause" because they favored a loose interpretation allowing the government to adapt, while Antifederalists opposed it fearing expanded abusive government power. Federalists believed a strong central government was necessary, but Antifederalists feared it would undermine state autonomy. Federalists thought checks and balances would protect citizens' rights, but Antifederalists argued only a bill of rights could guarantee these protections.
Federalist papers lesson plan student copy
The document provides background information on the Articles of Confederation, the Constitutional Convention, and the Federalist Papers. It summarizes that the Articles of Confederation created a weak national government, leading states to call the Constitutional Convention to draft a new Constitution. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay wrote the Federalist Papers to advocate for ratifying the new Constitution, addressing concerns around federalism, separation of powers, and creating a republic. It also summarizes opposing views from the Anti-Federalists and how the Bill of Rights was eventually added.
Fedsvs antifeds-121016004637-phpapp01
The document discusses the Federalist and Anti-Federalist positions during the ratification of the US Constitution. The Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government and feared it would ignore individual rights. Notable Anti-Federalists included Patrick Henry and George Mason. The Federalists supported ratifying the Constitution to give the national government more power to function effectively while still protecting state powers. Key Federalists included James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay who authored the Federalist Papers in support of ratification.
Federalist Vs
The document discusses the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the interpretation of the Elastic Clause, or Necessary and Proper Clause, of the US Constitution. Federalists supported a broad interpretation that allowed implied powers, wanting a strong federal government, while Anti-Federalists advocated for a limited federal government with only enumerated powers. The document also notes that the Federalist Papers aimed to influence ratification debates and future constitutional interpretation in favor of the Federalist perspective.
Review Power Point
The document summarizes key aspects of early American government including:
1) The Articles of Confederation provided a weak national government which caused problems and led to calls for changes.
2) In response, the new US Constitution established three branches of government and a system of checks and balances to limit any one branch's power.
3) The first five US Presidents oversaw events like establishing the capital, adding the Bill of Rights, the Louisiana Purchase and War of 1812.
Washington Heads the New Government
Presentation about a few of the things established by the first President of the United States, including a little bit about Alexander Hamilton's economic plans
Anti Federalists(Govt Project)
Anti-Federalists opposed the new US Constitution because they believed it concentrated too much power in the national government and threatened individual liberties. They argued for stronger state governments, direct elections, and term limits to empower common people. While initially against ratifying the Constitution, Anti-Federalists eventually supported it after the Bill of Rights was added to protect individual rights.
Hamilton vs jefferson opposition grudge match
The document describes a debate between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson's differing views on domestic and foreign policies during Washington's presidency. Students are asked to select which political figure they agree with more on several issues through a series of multiple choice questions. These issues include handling national debt, federalism, economic priorities, representation in government, interpreting the Constitution, and foreign policy regarding supporting revolutionaries in other countries. Selecting answers on the left or right side reveals whether the student's views align more closely with Hamilton or Jefferson.
Constitutional convention
The Constitutional Convention was called to address issues with the weak central government under the Articles of Confederation. Delegates debated plans for the new government, including the Virginia Plan which proposed a two-house legislature based on population and the New Jersey Plan which proposed one house with equal state representation. The Great Compromise blended these ideas by creating a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House and two senators per state in the Senate. Additionally, the Three-Fifths Compromise was adopted to determine representation and taxation based on state populations, including counting slaves as three-fifths of a person. The convention also established the executive and judicial branches and a process for electing the president through the Electoral College
Federalists & Republicans
Alexander Hamilton, as Secretary of Treasury, proposed a three-part financial plan to establish the national government's credit and enhance its authority. The plan involved the federal government assuming states' Revolutionary War debts, creating the national Bank of the United States, and implementing tariffs and taxes. While successful, the plan divided those in support of Hamilton's vision of a strong central government and wealthy merchants from Jeffersonian Republicans who favored a decentralized agrarian society. This division led to the emergence of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican political parties.
What's hot (20)
U.S. Government -- Chater 2,Section 5 "Ratifying the Constitution"
U.S. Government -- Chater 2,Section 5 "Ratifying the Constitution"
Recently uploaded
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
भारत सरकार द्वारा बड़े पैमाने पर व्हाट्सएप अभियान चलाए जाने से डेटा गोपनीयता, नैतिकता और चुनावों की निष्पक्षता पर सवाल उठते हैं।
Recently uploaded (10)
The Political Parties Of The Past And Present.Ppt Chs
- 1. CREATED BY: HALEY D., CHANDLER R., AND SCOTT M. The political parties of the past and present