This response from the Quality Assurance Manager addresses concerns raised in a warning letter from the FDA regarding three observations: (1) lack of adequate qualified personnel, (2) failure to establish time limits for production phases, and (3) lack of strict control over labeling. For each observation, the response provides corrective actions taken, preventative actions implemented, and an expected completion date of two months from the warning letter date. The overall tone is one of commitment to addressing the issues and ensuring compliance with regulations to protect patient safety.
This document provides guidance on validation and qualification principles from the World Health Organization (WHO). It discusses the need for validation and qualification activities to ensure product quality, safety, and efficacy throughout the product lifecycle. Key aspects covered include definitions of validation terms, approaches to validation planning, and documentation requirements such as a validation master plan and protocols.
The document discusses batch production record (BPR) review and release. It defines key terms like deviations, critical process parameters, critical quality attributes. It outlines regulatory requirements from ICH Q7, CFR 211, and consequences of non-compliance. The objectives of BPR review are to confirm the batch quality and was produced under control. Records of critical steps must be reviewed and approved by quality before release. Failure to comply with cGMPs can render a drug adulterated under the FDA act.
A guide for how to survive a FDA Warning letter. So you got at FDA 483 and now you have a FDA Warning Letter, learn how to survive the storm. For more information go to http://compliance-insight.com/fda-483-warning-letters/
This presentation was made to solely for students to make them aware/ understand basics of “Validation”. These slides are part of lectures delivered in M. Pharmacy Curriculum & taken up from various books and websites
How to succeed when you get a FDA 483 form letter. What to do and how to handle your FDA 483. For more information go to http://compliance-insight.com/fda-483-warning-letters/fda-483-observations/
Change control is a formal system by which qualified representatives of appropriate disciplines review proposed or actual changes that might effect a validated status. The intent is to determine the need for the action that would ensure that the system is maintained in a validated state.
Validation provides assurance that a process will consistently produce quality products meeting specifications. It begins in development and continues into production. There are several types of validation including prospective, concurrent, and retrospective validation. Prospective validation occurs during development to identify and address issues before commercial production. Concurrent validation monitors production batches to ensure the process remains in control. Retrospective validation reviews historical data to confirm a process's ability to produce quality products.
This document provides guidance on validation and qualification principles from the World Health Organization (WHO). It discusses the need for validation and qualification activities to ensure product quality, safety, and efficacy throughout the product lifecycle. Key aspects covered include definitions of validation terms, approaches to validation planning, and documentation requirements such as a validation master plan and protocols.
The document discusses batch production record (BPR) review and release. It defines key terms like deviations, critical process parameters, critical quality attributes. It outlines regulatory requirements from ICH Q7, CFR 211, and consequences of non-compliance. The objectives of BPR review are to confirm the batch quality and was produced under control. Records of critical steps must be reviewed and approved by quality before release. Failure to comply with cGMPs can render a drug adulterated under the FDA act.
A guide for how to survive a FDA Warning letter. So you got at FDA 483 and now you have a FDA Warning Letter, learn how to survive the storm. For more information go to http://compliance-insight.com/fda-483-warning-letters/
This presentation was made to solely for students to make them aware/ understand basics of “Validation”. These slides are part of lectures delivered in M. Pharmacy Curriculum & taken up from various books and websites
How to succeed when you get a FDA 483 form letter. What to do and how to handle your FDA 483. For more information go to http://compliance-insight.com/fda-483-warning-letters/fda-483-observations/
Change control is a formal system by which qualified representatives of appropriate disciplines review proposed or actual changes that might effect a validated status. The intent is to determine the need for the action that would ensure that the system is maintained in a validated state.
Validation provides assurance that a process will consistently produce quality products meeting specifications. It begins in development and continues into production. There are several types of validation including prospective, concurrent, and retrospective validation. Prospective validation occurs during development to identify and address issues before commercial production. Concurrent validation monitors production batches to ensure the process remains in control. Retrospective validation reviews historical data to confirm a process's ability to produce quality products.
Process Validation is Key important factor for the Pharmaceutical Industry to maintain Consistent Quality in product which claimed by the manufacturer.
This presentation is compiled by “ Drug Regulations” from freely available resources like the FDA on the World wide web. “Drug Regulations” is a non profit organization which provides free online resource to the Pharmaceutical Professional.
Visit http://www.drugregulations.org for latest information from the world of Pharmaceuticals.
Handling of a fda inspection [compatibility mode]Kiran Kota
The document provides guidance on handling FDA inspections. It discusses key points like signing the FDA Form 482 notice, having subject matter experts available to answer questions, and reviewing documentation before providing it to inspectors. It also describes the FDA's quality system inspection approach, the different inspection classifications (NAI, VAI, OAI), and what is contained in the Establishment Inspection Report provided after an inspection.
Documentation in Pharmaceutical Industry Part I Tarif Hussian
This document discusses documentation practices in the pharmaceutical industry. It provides definitions of key terms like documentation and good documentation practices. It also describes important pharmaceutical documents like those related to drug substance, drug product, and exploratory product development briefs. These documents provide information on development, manufacturing, testing, and controls of drugs to ensure their quality, safety and efficacy. Adherence to documentation standards like ALCOA and ALCOA+ helps ensure the integrity and reliability of data in the pharmaceutical industry.
The document summarizes the key changes in the 2011 FDA guidance on process validation from the 1987 guidance. It outlines a three-stage approach to process validation: 1) process design, 2) process qualification, and 3) continued process verification. The 2011 guidance emphasizes process understanding, use of statistical methods, and alignment with product lifecycles. It also revises concepts like worst-case conditions, revalidation, and allows matrix and concurrent validation approaches under certain circumstances.
This document discusses vendor certification and categorization. It defines vendor certification as ensuring a vendor will meet regulatory expectations. Vendors are categorized from 1 to 4 based on risk, with category 1 being experts with minimal monitoring and category 4 being sole-source API manufacturers requiring intense monitoring. The document also outlines the vendor qualification process, including selection criteria, evaluation of production processes, and standard procedures for quality audits.
The document discusses Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs), New Drug Applications (NDAs), Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs), and Supplemental New Drug Applications (SNDAs). It provides details on the purpose and requirements of each application type, including necessary contents, guidelines, and the laws and regulations that govern the FDA drug approval process.
The document discusses Good Automated Manufacturing Practice (GAMP), which are guidelines for manufacturers and users of automated systems in the pharmaceutical industry published by the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE). GAMP aims to ensure pharmaceutical products have the required quality by establishing principles and procedures for validating automated systems. Key aspects of GAMP covered in the document include focusing on building quality into each stage of manufacturing rather than testing it in, covering all production aspects from raw materials to staff training. The document also summarizes the GAMP5 guidelines released in 2008, which provide a framework for validating computerized systems to ensure they are fit for use and compliant with regulations. GAMP5 emphasizes product and process understanding, a lifecycle approach,
Qualification of tablet compression machine- By Kaleem PetkarKaleem Petkar
This slide includes all the qualification tests which are required in tablet compression machine to be called as qualified for further batch processing.
The document discusses guidelines for supplemental new drug applications (sNDAs) according to the US FDA. It outlines three categories of variations - major, moderate, and minor - based on their potential impact. Major changes require prior approval and could impact safety or efficacy. Moderate changes require submission 30 days before distribution or upon FDA receipt. Minor changes only require description in the annual report. The document provides examples of changes in manufacturing sites, processes, specifications, container closure systems, and labeling that would fall under each category. Close monitoring and reporting of any post-approval changes is recommended to ensure the quality, safety and efficacy of pre-qualified products are not adversely affected.
This document discusses process validation. It defines process validation as establishing documented evidence that a process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications. The key aspects of process validation are to obtain consistent and reliable data, demonstrate that the process remains in control, and show the process works as intended. There are different types of process validation including prospective, retrospective, and concurrent validation. Process validation involves multiple phases from process design and qualification to process verification and monitoring. It is important for quality, safety, efficacy and compliance with global regulatory agencies.
Distribution records document the transfer of drug products from manufacturers to distributors and must include information such as product name and strength, manufacturer, lot number, quantity shipped, and recipient. They allow defective products to be recalled and ensure accountability. Records should contain sections for product information, transaction details, distribution information, and recipient information according to WHO guidelines. An example distribution record format was also presented.
This document discusses supplemental new drug applications (SNDA) which are submitted to the FDA for approval of changes to approved drugs. It defines what types of changes require an SNDA, including manufacturing changes, formulation changes, and labeling changes. It categorizes changes as major, moderate, or minor based on their potential impact on quality, safety, or efficacy. Major changes require prior approval, moderate changes require 30 days' notice, and minor changes are reported annually. Examples are provided for each category of change.
This document discusses deviations and out-of-specification/out-of-trend results in the pharmaceutical industry. It defines deviations as unwanted events that differ from approved processes or standards. Deviations are classified as major, critical, or minor depending on their impact. Out-of-specification results occur when test results fall outside predetermined specifications, requiring investigation. Out-of-trend results differ from historical results but are still within specifications, also necessitating investigation. The document provides examples of planned and unplanned deviations as well as approaches to minimize out-of-specification results through good practices.
Quality assurance audits in pharma industries rasika walunj
Quality audits are systematic examinations to determine if activities comply with plans and regulations. Pharmaceutical manufacturers use audits to verify compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Audits have two goals - to verify manufacturing systems are controlled and to permit timely problem correction. Audits evaluate GMP compliance in production and quality control. They are performed routinely and in cases like recalls. Areas audited include personnel, facilities, equipment, production, quality control, documentation, and more. Audits are classified as internal, external, or regulatory. Internal audits ensure quality systems and identify pre-inspection problems. External audits reduce risk for partners. Regulatory audits build cooperation between authorities. Effective auditing requires qualified staff, documentation,
Quality assurance and quality control are important concepts in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Quality assurance refers to planned and systematic activities that ensure quality in processes, while quality control refers to activities that ensure quality in products. Some key differences are that quality assurance focuses on preventing defects through proper processes, while quality control identifies defects in finished products. Total quality management aims to produce perfect products through quality measures at every stage of production and requires team effort across an organization.
This ppt consists of types of FDA inspection, and how to prepare for FDA inspection of pharmaceutical mfg site, and what to do before FDA inspection, During FDA inspection, and after FDA inspection.
Process Validation is Key important factor for the Pharmaceutical Industry to maintain Consistent Quality in product which claimed by the manufacturer.
This presentation is compiled by “ Drug Regulations” from freely available resources like the FDA on the World wide web. “Drug Regulations” is a non profit organization which provides free online resource to the Pharmaceutical Professional.
Visit http://www.drugregulations.org for latest information from the world of Pharmaceuticals.
Handling of a fda inspection [compatibility mode]Kiran Kota
The document provides guidance on handling FDA inspections. It discusses key points like signing the FDA Form 482 notice, having subject matter experts available to answer questions, and reviewing documentation before providing it to inspectors. It also describes the FDA's quality system inspection approach, the different inspection classifications (NAI, VAI, OAI), and what is contained in the Establishment Inspection Report provided after an inspection.
Documentation in Pharmaceutical Industry Part I Tarif Hussian
This document discusses documentation practices in the pharmaceutical industry. It provides definitions of key terms like documentation and good documentation practices. It also describes important pharmaceutical documents like those related to drug substance, drug product, and exploratory product development briefs. These documents provide information on development, manufacturing, testing, and controls of drugs to ensure their quality, safety and efficacy. Adherence to documentation standards like ALCOA and ALCOA+ helps ensure the integrity and reliability of data in the pharmaceutical industry.
The document summarizes the key changes in the 2011 FDA guidance on process validation from the 1987 guidance. It outlines a three-stage approach to process validation: 1) process design, 2) process qualification, and 3) continued process verification. The 2011 guidance emphasizes process understanding, use of statistical methods, and alignment with product lifecycles. It also revises concepts like worst-case conditions, revalidation, and allows matrix and concurrent validation approaches under certain circumstances.
This document discusses vendor certification and categorization. It defines vendor certification as ensuring a vendor will meet regulatory expectations. Vendors are categorized from 1 to 4 based on risk, with category 1 being experts with minimal monitoring and category 4 being sole-source API manufacturers requiring intense monitoring. The document also outlines the vendor qualification process, including selection criteria, evaluation of production processes, and standard procedures for quality audits.
The document discusses Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs), New Drug Applications (NDAs), Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs), and Supplemental New Drug Applications (SNDAs). It provides details on the purpose and requirements of each application type, including necessary contents, guidelines, and the laws and regulations that govern the FDA drug approval process.
The document discusses Good Automated Manufacturing Practice (GAMP), which are guidelines for manufacturers and users of automated systems in the pharmaceutical industry published by the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE). GAMP aims to ensure pharmaceutical products have the required quality by establishing principles and procedures for validating automated systems. Key aspects of GAMP covered in the document include focusing on building quality into each stage of manufacturing rather than testing it in, covering all production aspects from raw materials to staff training. The document also summarizes the GAMP5 guidelines released in 2008, which provide a framework for validating computerized systems to ensure they are fit for use and compliant with regulations. GAMP5 emphasizes product and process understanding, a lifecycle approach,
Qualification of tablet compression machine- By Kaleem PetkarKaleem Petkar
This slide includes all the qualification tests which are required in tablet compression machine to be called as qualified for further batch processing.
The document discusses guidelines for supplemental new drug applications (sNDAs) according to the US FDA. It outlines three categories of variations - major, moderate, and minor - based on their potential impact. Major changes require prior approval and could impact safety or efficacy. Moderate changes require submission 30 days before distribution or upon FDA receipt. Minor changes only require description in the annual report. The document provides examples of changes in manufacturing sites, processes, specifications, container closure systems, and labeling that would fall under each category. Close monitoring and reporting of any post-approval changes is recommended to ensure the quality, safety and efficacy of pre-qualified products are not adversely affected.
This document discusses process validation. It defines process validation as establishing documented evidence that a process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications. The key aspects of process validation are to obtain consistent and reliable data, demonstrate that the process remains in control, and show the process works as intended. There are different types of process validation including prospective, retrospective, and concurrent validation. Process validation involves multiple phases from process design and qualification to process verification and monitoring. It is important for quality, safety, efficacy and compliance with global regulatory agencies.
Distribution records document the transfer of drug products from manufacturers to distributors and must include information such as product name and strength, manufacturer, lot number, quantity shipped, and recipient. They allow defective products to be recalled and ensure accountability. Records should contain sections for product information, transaction details, distribution information, and recipient information according to WHO guidelines. An example distribution record format was also presented.
This document discusses supplemental new drug applications (SNDA) which are submitted to the FDA for approval of changes to approved drugs. It defines what types of changes require an SNDA, including manufacturing changes, formulation changes, and labeling changes. It categorizes changes as major, moderate, or minor based on their potential impact on quality, safety, or efficacy. Major changes require prior approval, moderate changes require 30 days' notice, and minor changes are reported annually. Examples are provided for each category of change.
This document discusses deviations and out-of-specification/out-of-trend results in the pharmaceutical industry. It defines deviations as unwanted events that differ from approved processes or standards. Deviations are classified as major, critical, or minor depending on their impact. Out-of-specification results occur when test results fall outside predetermined specifications, requiring investigation. Out-of-trend results differ from historical results but are still within specifications, also necessitating investigation. The document provides examples of planned and unplanned deviations as well as approaches to minimize out-of-specification results through good practices.
Quality assurance audits in pharma industries rasika walunj
Quality audits are systematic examinations to determine if activities comply with plans and regulations. Pharmaceutical manufacturers use audits to verify compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Audits have two goals - to verify manufacturing systems are controlled and to permit timely problem correction. Audits evaluate GMP compliance in production and quality control. They are performed routinely and in cases like recalls. Areas audited include personnel, facilities, equipment, production, quality control, documentation, and more. Audits are classified as internal, external, or regulatory. Internal audits ensure quality systems and identify pre-inspection problems. External audits reduce risk for partners. Regulatory audits build cooperation between authorities. Effective auditing requires qualified staff, documentation,
Quality assurance and quality control are important concepts in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Quality assurance refers to planned and systematic activities that ensure quality in processes, while quality control refers to activities that ensure quality in products. Some key differences are that quality assurance focuses on preventing defects through proper processes, while quality control identifies defects in finished products. Total quality management aims to produce perfect products through quality measures at every stage of production and requires team effort across an organization.
This ppt consists of types of FDA inspection, and how to prepare for FDA inspection of pharmaceutical mfg site, and what to do before FDA inspection, During FDA inspection, and after FDA inspection.
In a welcome move, the Pharmacy Council of India has recently re-structured the syllabus of the
Bachelor of Pharmacy course. In the effort to make the content more relevant to the practice of
pharmacy in its current form, we now find new, important subjects introduced, and Pharmaceutical
Quality Assurance is one of them.
This document summarizes types of validation and government regulations related to validation. It discusses four main types of validation: process validation, cleaning validation, equipment validation, and validation of analytical methods. It also outlines some key US FDA regulations related to validation from the Code of Federal Regulations including requirements for validating automated processes, suppliers' test results, manufacturing processes, and sterilization processes. The document emphasizes that government regulations like cGMP define validation as a system to consistently produce products according to quality standards and minimize risks that cannot be eliminated through final testing.
Ignace Vallejo is applying for a position as a Sr Medical Writer. He has over 15 years of experience in quality assurance and quality control roles in the biotech/pharmaceutical industry. Most recently, he worked as a Senior QA Compliance Specialist at Laureate Pharma Inc. where he performed internal and external audits and ensured compliance with cGMP and FDA regulations. Previously, he released products at Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb in compliance with USP, EP, and FDA guidelines. He holds a Master's degree in Biology and a B.A. in Biology and is a certified cGMP Quality Auditor.
This document provides an overview of key quality assurance and quality management concepts including quality management systems, quality assurance, quality control, and good manufacturing practices (GMP). It defines these terms and describes their purposes and responsibilities. A quality management system consists of quality planning, assurance, control, and improvement to ensure products meet requirements. Quality assurance focuses on preventing defects, quality control identifies defects, and GMP provides minimum standards for pharmaceutical production and quality.
CGMP (current good manufacturing practices) ensures that products are consistently produced and controlled to quality standards appropriate for their intended use through both production and quality control. All manufacturing of pharmaceuticals must comply with FDA cGMP regulations, which are constantly updated. cGMP covers all aspects of manufacturing from personnel training to facilities, equipment, production, testing, and record keeping to ensure quality pharmaceutical products.
GMP refers to the integrated management control system and facilities used for manufacturing drugs intended for human use to ensure they are safe and effective. Key aspects of GMP include clearly defined and validated manufacturing processes, trained operators, comprehensive record keeping, quality control, and compliance with regulations. GMP guidelines specify requirements for facilities, equipment, production, packaging, testing, distribution, and quality management.
1) The document announces a training session on Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) of the 21st century to be held on April 4th, 2021. It discusses how GMP standards have evolved over time to focus more on product development, process understanding and control strategies.
2) GMP via a quality management system is important for ensuring drug quality and preventing errors, as testing a small sample cannot guarantee the quality of an entire batch. Advances in technology are reshaping GMP requirements.
3) The training methodology will include tutorials, interactive discussions, and real-world case studies to describe regulatory expectations and keep learning objectives aligned. Participants will be assessed in real-time.
Quality Control Assurance Management.pptxMuntasir18
Quality control, quality assurance, and food safety are important concepts. Quality control evaluates final products to assign quality categories, but has limited ability to improve quality. Quality assurance is a planned, systematic approach to provide confidence that products and services will meet requirements. It focuses on how processes are performed. Food safety ensures food will not harm consumers when prepared properly. Responsibilities of quality assurance include ensuring quality policies are followed and products meet specifications. Quality control conducts testing and inspection. Proper control of raw materials, in-process items, and manufacturing variation are important to maintain quality and safety.
Quality control, quality assurance, and food safety are important concepts. Quality control evaluates final products to assign quality categories, but has limited ability to improve quality. Quality assurance is a planned, systematic approach to providing confidence that products and services will meet requirements. It focuses on how processes are performed. Food safety provides assurance that food will not harm consumers when prepared and eaten as intended. Responsibilities of quality assurance include ensuring quality policies are followed and products meet specifications.
This document provides an overview of quality assurance, good manufacturing practices (GMP), and good laboratory practices (GLP). It defines each concept and outlines their key principles and goals. Quality assurance aims to ensure products meet the required quality standards and involves implementing GMP, GLP, and other quality control measures. GMP focuses on establishing processes to minimize risks like contamination during manufacturing. GLP provides a quality system for non-clinical health and safety studies to ensure they are properly planned, performed, documented and reported.
It's an assignment on selected topics on Pharmaceuticals. Which are
1. Quality Management system in Pharmaceutical Industry
2. Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Pharmaceutical Industry
3. Difference between Quality Assurance and Quality Control
4. Briefly describe Pharmacopoeia, Drug Formulary, Drug compendia,
Pharmaceutical codex
5. Short notes on British Pharmacopoeia, US Pharmacopoeia,
European Pharmacopoeia, Japanese Pharmacopoeia, British
Pharmaceutical Codex
6. What is monograph in Pharmacopoeia? What does it contain?
This document defines quality assurance and quality control, compares their key differences, and outlines their functions in ensuring product quality. Quality assurance is a proactive process focused on preventing defects during development and production, while quality control is reactive and identifies defects in finished products. Both work together to fulfill quality requirements through planned activities and testing. The document also discusses sources of quality variation and how to control them, including strict raw material and in-process testing and monitoring of environmental and manufacturing conditions.
Chuck Cato has over 15 years of experience in quality assurance, food safety, and laboratory management. He is currently the Quality Assurance and Food Safety Manager at Farmers Cooperative Creamery in Oregon, where he oversees testing and auditing. Prior experience includes positions as a Laboratory Technician, Quality Assurance Manager, Production Supervisor, and Lab Director at various dairy, food processing, and laboratory companies. He has extensive experience implementing and maintaining food safety programs and certifications like SQF, ISO, and HACCP. Cato received a BS in Microbiology from Boise State University and holds multiple relevant training certifications.
Tony seruga yolanda seruga business expert. Tony Seruga Yolanda Seruga hates scam and fraud and any kinds of ripoff. Tony Seruga a business i con knows pros and cons and has got very good reviews as he got the best review of internet marketer.In the early years, Tony Seruga started a professional lawn service, employing college kids to do the actual work when he was only 14 years old building revenues to over $12,000 per year by the time he was 17. Tony built his first computer from a kit in 1976 and started his first “online” business in the early 1980s, using AOL and Compuserve.
Tony is a serial entrepreneur, having personally started over 240 businesses and over 600 with business partners. Tony has mentored thousands upon thousands of business owners.
Tony has been an early stage investor and entrepreneur since 1987. Tony has over two decades of experience in the venture capital, technology and entertainment industries in a multitude of investing, operational and engineering roles acting as a key adviser. In addition to his investing efforts, Tony has been active with several non-profit organizations. Tony holds a Juris Doctorate, although he never chose to practice law, opting for buying and selling businesses and investing in those projects he felt had the best chance of success.
Tony was co-owner of half a dozen early search engines including three pay-per-click search engines and was an early angel investor and adviser to four different businesses that went on to become multi-billion dollar companies. As a business adviser, Tony’s past client roster included a number of household names and celebrities.
And while Tony enjoyed speaking at business and marketing events all over the world, his real passion is to empower entrepreneurs and business owners to create massive success. Tony loves to help people to understand specifically what it takes to build a successful business. He has a very successful background in venture capital, investing and marketing. He has spent two decades working with start-ups to major global brands increasing sales, productivity and overall success and is an innovator with a remarkable ability to determine and dictate success strategies that enable companies to seize global market opportunities.
For everyone that either wishes to start their own business, currently owns a business or would like to capitalize the entrepreneurial dream, Tony’s message will enlighten them with knowledge and actionable principles to turn that passion into success. Tony has an extensive background in starting businesses, commercial real estate development and building companies around the world. Over the past two decades, he has specialized in helping companies launch, grow and create exponential valuation in the marketplace.
For more info about Tony Seruga visit http://tonyserugatonyserugatonyseruga.blogspot.com/
Quality control and quality assurance are important concepts for ensuring food safety. Quality control involves evaluating the final product to check that it meets standards, while quality assurance is a systematic approach to preventing issues and providing confidence that products will meet requirements. Food safety aims to ensure food will not harm consumers and differs from other quality attributes as safety issues can be difficult to observe. Proper quality control, assurance practices and attention to food hazards help protect public health.
1. The document discusses the key differences between quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC). QA focuses on processes and aims to prevent defects, while QC focuses on products and aims to identify defects.
2. It also provides an overview of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), which ensure products are consistently produced according to quality standards. GMP covers all aspects of production from materials to equipment to personnel.
3. The main GMP principles are that manufacturing processes are clearly defined and validated, adequate resources are provided, instructions are written clearly, procedures are followed correctly, and comprehensive records are kept.
This document discusses concepts related to quality management and quality control in the pharmaceutical industry. It defines key terms like total quality management, quality assurance, and good manufacturing practices. It explains that quality should be built into products from the beginning of the production process through materials procurement, manufacturing, distribution, and obtaining customer feedback. It also outlines the objectives, systems, and components of quality management systems, including quality planning, risk management, corrective actions, and change control. Quality control is described as the system for ensuring proper testing and release of materials and products.
Similar to Mock Response to a FDA Warning Letter (20)
Gemma Wean- Nutritional solution for Artemiasmuskaan0008
GEMMA Wean is a high end larval co-feeding and weaning diet aimed at Artemia optimisation and is fortified with a high level of proteins and phospholipids. GEMMA Wean provides the early weaned juveniles with dedicated fish nutrition and is an ideal follow on from GEMMA Micro or Artemia.
GEMMA Wean has an optimised nutritional balance and physical quality so that it flows more freely and spreads readily on the water surface. The balance of phospholipid classes to- gether with the production technology based on a low temperature extrusion process improve the physical aspect of the pellets while still retaining the high phospholipid content.
GEMMA Wean is available in 0.1mm, 0.2mm and 0.3mm. There is also a 0.5mm micro-pellet, GEMMA Wean Diamond, which covers the early nursery stage from post-weaning to pre-growing.
This particular slides consist of- what is Pneumothorax,what are it's causes and it's effect on body, risk factors, symptoms,complications, diagnosis and role of physiotherapy in it.
This slide is very helpful for physiotherapy students and also for other medical and healthcare students.
Here is a summary of Pneumothorax:
Pneumothorax, also known as a collapsed lung, is a condition that occurs when air leaks into the space between the lung and chest wall. This air buildup puts pressure on the lung, preventing it from expanding fully when you breathe. A pneumothorax can cause a complete or partial collapse of the lung.
The facial nerve, also known as cranial nerve VII, is one of the 12 cranial nerves originating from the brain. It's a mixed nerve, meaning it contains both sensory and motor fibres, and it plays a crucial role in controlling various facial muscles, as well as conveying sensory information from the taste buds on the anterior two-thirds of the tongue.
TEST BANK For Accounting Information Systems, 3rd Edition by Vernon Richardso...rightmanforbloodline
TEST BANK For Accounting Information Systems, 3rd Edition by Vernon Richardson, Verified Chapters 1 - 18, Complete Newest Version
TEST BANK For Accounting Information Systems, 3rd Edition by Vernon Richardson, Verified Chapters 1 - 18, Complete Newest Version
TEST BANK For Accounting Information Systems, 3rd Edition by Vernon Richardson, Verified Chapters 1 - 18, Complete Newest Version
This particular slides consist of- what is hypotension,what are it's causes and it's effect on body, risk factors, symptoms,complications, diagnosis and role of physiotherapy in it.
This slide is very helpful for physiotherapy students and also for other medical and healthcare students.
Here is the summary of hypotension:
Hypotension, or low blood pressure, is when the pressure of blood circulating in the body is lower than normal or expected. It's only a problem if it negatively impacts the body and causes symptoms. Normal blood pressure is usually between 90/60 mmHg and 120/80 mmHg, but pressures below 90/60 are generally considered hypotensive.
Michigan HealthTech Market Map 2024. Includes 7 categories: Policy Makers, Academic Innovation Centers, Digital Health Providers, Healthcare Providers, Payers / Insurance, Device Companies, Life Science Companies, Innovation Accelerators. Developed by the Michigan-Israel Business Accelerator
Can coffee help me lose weight? Yes, 25,422 users in the USA use it for that ...nirahealhty
The South Beach Coffee Java Diet is a variation of the popular South Beach Diet, which was developed by cardiologist Dr. Arthur Agatston. The original South Beach Diet focuses on consuming lean proteins, healthy fats, and low-glycemic index carbohydrates. The South Beach Coffee Java Diet adds the element of coffee, specifically caffeine, to enhance weight loss and improve energy levels.
Comprehensive Rainy Season Advisory: Safety and Preparedness Tips.pdfDr Rachana Gujar
The "Comprehensive Rainy Season Advisory: Safety and Preparedness Tips" offers essential guidance for navigating rainy weather conditions. It covers strategies for staying safe during storms, flood prevention measures, and advice on preparing for inclement weather. This advisory aims to ensure individuals are equipped with the knowledge and resources to handle the challenges of the rainy season effectively, emphasizing safety, preparedness, and resilience.
Let's Talk About It: Breast Cancer (What is Mindset and Does it Really Matter?)bkling
Your mindset is the way you make sense of the world around you. This lens influences the way you think, the way you feel, and how you might behave in certain situations. Let's talk about mindset myths that can get us into trouble and ways to cultivate a mindset to support your cancer survivorship in authentic ways. Let’s Talk About It!
About this webinar: This talk will introduce what cancer rehabilitation is, where it fits into the cancer trajectory, and who can benefit from it. In addition, the current landscape of cancer rehabilitation in Canada will be discussed and the need for advocacy to increase access to this essential component of cancer care.
DECODING THE RISKS - ALCOHOL, TOBACCO & DRUGS.pdfDr Rachana Gujar
Introduction: Substance use education is crucial due to its prevalence and societal impact.
Alcohol Use: Immediate and long-term risks include impaired judgment, health issues, and social consequences.
Tobacco Use: Immediate effects include increased heart rate, while long-term risks encompass cancer and heart disease.
Drug Use: Risks vary depending on the drug type, including health and psychological implications.
Prevention Strategies: Education, healthy coping mechanisms, community support, and policies are vital in preventing substance use.
Harm Reduction Strategies: Safe use practices, medication-assisted treatment, and naloxone availability aim to reduce harm.
Seeking Help for Addiction: Recognizing signs, available treatments, support systems, and resources are essential for recovery.
Personal Stories: Real stories of recovery emphasize hope and resilience.
Interactive Q&A: Engage the audience and encourage discussion.
Conclusion: Recap key points and emphasize the importance of awareness, prevention, and seeking help.
Resources: Provide contact information and links for further support.
PrudentRx: A Resource for Patient Education and Engagement
Mock Response to a FDA Warning Letter
1. Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research HFM-600
1401 Rockville Pike, Suite 200N
Rockville, Maryland 20852-1448
Dear Ms. Mary A. Malarkey:
We are in receipt of your communication dated 16 on April 2014. We take your communication very seriously and commit ourselves to address your concerns adequately and expeditiously. We would take all the necessary measures to ensure our customers’ well-being and safety. I've been reached out to consult on the issued observations on the behalf of Mr. Antonio Lopez de Silanes Perez the President/CEO of the company. The warning letter has been brought to my attention late. Therefore, I apologize for the late response. Enclosed please find an attachment that addresses your concerns on an individual and on a systematic basis. This documentation includes the following:
7. You failed to assure that there are an adequate number of qualified personnel to perform and
supervise the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of each drug product [21 CFR 211.25(c)].
Specifically, during an interview, the Quality manager stated that investigations are often not conducted due to a lack of personnel. The actions identified by the inspector in this observation resulted in the production of the drug product being stopped. An extensive review of number, qualifications and experience of the personnel in all departments directly or indirectly affecting quality of the drug product including manufacture, processing, packing and holding departments was performed by Quality Assurance and senior management. In addition, the manufacturing, processing, packing and holding process and procedures were reviewed by Quality Assurance and senior management. Moreover, an investigation was conducted by third party inspection company to determine batches of the drug product affected by lack of adequate number of personnel in departments previously mentioned. To ensure compliance, the corrective actions were introduced such as affected drug products that met the requirements would be released. GMP retraining would been carried out for all staff by Quality Assurance. Several qualified personnel with several years of experience would recruited for multiple operator and supervisor positions and trained according to GMP. The SOP regarding personnel in the company would been updated to incorporate inspecting the number and qualifications of personnel. The Quality manager in question is no longer with the company. Preventative actions would include a weekly follow-up would be conducted by Quality Assurance to ensure the competency of the personnel. The manufacturing, processing, packing and holding processes would be reviewed by Quality Assurance to detect any non conformance. Number of investigations conducted per month would be assessed and reviewed by Quality Assurance to ensure its compliance to GMP requirements. Status of the proposed corrective and preventative actions is ongoing and the expected date would be two months from the issue date of the warning letter (16 June 2014).
2. 9. You failed to establish time limits for the completion of each phase of production to assure the quality of the drug product [21 CFR 211.111]. Specifically, you have not established time limits for Anascorp® sterile filtration and aseptic filling. This observation has led to stopping the production of the drug product in question. Affected drug products were held in quarantine for further testing by third party inspection. Procedures and personnel related to production of the affected drug product were extensively investigated and reviewed by Quality Assurance. This investigation included procedures for sterile filtration and aseptic filling of Anascorp and was specifically assessed by Quality Assurance. Corrections actions would include the release of affected drug products including Anascorp in case the requirements were met. Time limits for completion of each phase of production would be developed by Research and Development and later validated. Validation protocol and procedures for the time limits would be developed. SOPs for the established time limits would be developed and personnel would be trained on this SOP to ensure compliance. Preventative actions would include a third party inspection conducted on daily basis on the drug intermediates after each phase of production to ensure the quality of the drug product. Time limits for completion of each phase of production including time limits for sterile filtration and aseptic filling would be regularly assessed daily by third party inspection. The competency of the personnel in the production area would be reviewed weekly by Quality Assurance. Status of the proposed corrective and preventative actions is ongoing and the expected date would be two months from the issue date of the warning letter (16 June 2014).
11. You failed to assure strict control is exercised over labeling issued for use in drug product labeling
operations [21 CFR 211.125(a)]. Specifically, during the inspection the packaging components
warehouse door was unlocked and therefore access to the room was not limited to authorized personnel. The observation of lack of strict control over labeling prompt an investigation for this labeling issue. Drug products affected by this issue were recalled and their labels were further assessed by Quality Assurance. The supervisor of the Packaging department and personnel in the packaging and warehouse department as well as every personnel authorized to unlock the door in question were investigated as a result of not complying to GMP requirements. Corrective actions includes that the affected drug products would be released if the labels met the requirements. Quality Assurance would conduct a GMP retraining of all staff including personnel in packaging department. Retraining would emphasize the importance of adhering to regulations regarding strict control of areas (i.e. packaging and labeling area) limited to authorized personnel. Quality Assurance would update the current SOP regarding strict control of GMP areas. A log book developed by Quality Assurance would be situated at these areas as authorized personnel would have to sign before unlocking the door and entering the room. The Facility Planning and Designing department would assess all doors in GMP areas for their ability to provide strict control over these areas. Preventative actions include a daily inspection of all GMP areas conducted by Quality Assurance. A follow-up including inspecting the doors to provide strict control would be conducted by Quality Assurance and the Facility Planning and Designing departments. Log books presented at the locked doors would be reviewed daily by Quality Assurance. Status of the proposed
3. corrective and preventative actions is ongoing and the expected date would be two months from the issue date of the warning letter (16 June 2014). I hope the above responses represent a clear portrayal of actions taken and of the new policies that have been implemented to comply with regulations and prevent such occurrences in the future. We would not limit our corrective and preventative actions to the above observation. We plan to continuously monitor our quality system for defects and correct them immediately. We remain committed to patient safety by ensuring GMP compliance. Sincerely, Muna Ali Manager, Quality Assurance Department
Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V
4. Observation Number
Observation
Response
Corrective Action
Preventative Action
Status
Expected or Completed Date
7
You failed to assure that there are an adequate number of qualified personnel to perform and
supervise the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of each drug product [21 CFR 211.25(c)].
Specifically, during an interview, the Quality manager stated that investigations are often not conducted
due to a lack of personnel.
The actions identified by the inspector in this observation resulted in the production of the drug product being stopped. Also, an extensive review of number, qualifications and experience of the personnel in all departments directly or indirectly affecting quality of the drug product including manufacture, processing, packing and holding departments was performed by Quality Assurance and senior management. In addition, the manufacturing, processing, packing and holding process and procedures were reviewed by Quality
Affected drug products that met the requirements would be released. GMP retraining would been carried out for all staff by Quality Assurance. Several qualified personnel with several years of experience would recruited for multiple operator and supervisor positions and trained according to cGMP. The SOP regarding personnel in the company would been updated to incorporate inspecting the number and qualifications, of personnel. The Quality manager in question is no longer with the company.
A weekly follow-up would be conducted by Quality Assurance to ensure the competency of the personnel. The manufacturing, processing, packing and holding processes would be reviewed by Quality Assurance to detect any non conformance. Number of investigations conducted per month would be assessed and reviewed by Quality Assurance to ensure its compliance to GMP requirements.
Ongoing
16 June 2014
5. Assurance and senior management. Moreover, an investigation was conducted by third party inspection company to determine batches of the drug product affected by lack of adequate number of personnel in departments previously mentioned. Affected drug products were held in quarantine and only released if it met specifications through analytical testing performed by third party inspection company.
9
You failed to establish time limits for the completion of each phase of production to assure the
quality of the drug product [21 CFR 211.111].
This observation has led to stopping of production of the drug product in question. Affected drug products were held in quarantine for further testing
Affected drug products including Anascorp would be released in case the requirements were met. Time limits for completion of each phase of
A third party inspection would be conducted on daily basis on the drug intermediates after each phase of production to ensure the quality of the drug product.
Ongoing
16 June 2014
6. Specifically, you have not established time limits for Anascorp® sterile filtration and aseptic filling.
by third party inspection. Procedures and personnel related to production of the affected drug product were extensively investigated and reviewed by Quality Assurance. This investigation included procedures for sterile filtration and aseptic filling of Anascorp and was specifically assessed by Quality Assurance.
production would be developed by Research and Development and later validated. Validation protocol and procedures for the time limits would be developed. SOPs for the established time limits would be developed and personnel would be trained on this SOP to ensure compliance.
Time limits for completion of each phase of production including time limits for sterile filtration and aseptic filling would be regularly assessed daily by third party inspection. The competency of the personnel in the production area would be reviewed weekly by Quality Assurance.
11
You failed to assure strict control is exercised over labeling issued for use in drug product labeling
operations [21 CFR 211.125(a)]. Specifically, during the inspection the packaging components
warehouse door was unlocked and
The observation of lack of strict control over labeling prompt an investigation for this labeling issue. Drug products affected by this issue were recalled and their labels were further assessed by Quality Assurance. The supervisor of the Packaging department
The affected drug products would be released if the labels met the requirements. Quality Assurance would conduct a GMP retraining of all staff including personnel in packaging department. Retraining would emphasize
Quality Assurance would conduct a daily inspection of all GMP areas. A follow-up including inspecting the doors to provide strict control would be conducted by Quality Assurance and the Facility Planning and Designing departments. Log books presented at
Ongoing
16 June 2014
7. therefore access to the room was not limited to authorized
personnel.
and personnel in the packaging and warehouse department as well as every personnel authorized to unlock the door in question were investigated as a result of not complying to GMP requirements.
the importance of adhering to regulations regarding strict control of areas (i.e. packaging and labeling area) limited to authorized personnel. Quality Assurance would update the current SOP regarding strict control of GMP areas. A log book developed by Quality Assurance would be situated at these areas as authorized personnel would have to sign before unlocking the door and entering the room. The Facility Planning and Designing department would assess all doors in GMP areas for their ability to provide strict control over these areas.
the locked doors would be reviewed daily by Quality Assurance.