Founding Fathers' Vision For Future Generations

Fathers Of The Founding Fathers
Many historians argue if the founding fathers made this country for the welfare of the future people
of this nation or for their own fortune and self–greed. It has been a long–lasting feud to unearth the
answer. Many debate that the founding fathers would want to see the nation they created become
wealthy and set an example for other nations. Others argue that they did this for their own benefits
and so they could have more power and wealth, and didn't care for the future generations. The
founding fathers created this country thinking about the well–being of the future generations that
would eventually lead and take care for the nation, even in it would benefit them, and they would
gain power and wealth. They didn't care for what they gained, but what they achieved. They
believed every man, woman, or child, most of them, were equal and had the same natural rights as
anyone. They wrote the Declaration stating everyone has the same opportunities as someone else.
They wanted everyone to live in a nation where they can find these opportunities and be better
people. In the National Archives it states," the founding fathers wrote, in their Declaration of
Independence from England that the basis of the document is their belief that all men are created
equal and that teach each man is granted, by God , a set of inalienable rights." The founding fathers
had an idea saying that everyone is equal and everyone has rights given from God that cannot be
taken away from any man, and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Bill Of Rights Case Study
1.) The Constitution of the United States has the first ten amendments dedicated to its citizens call
the Bill of Rights. In the First amendment, it protects the freedom of speech and four other
important rights. It prevents the government from influencing what the public can view and know.
In the view of pornography and obscenity, it creates a line from art and photography and obscenity.
Also, it allows the government to interfere with things that could harm the public, in this case, the
young. Although the government is involved, they are only involved with the goal of protecting the
citizens from harm. The three rules in identifying if something is pornographic and/or obscene is
rather simple and is a combination of all past tests. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The difference between them is the involvement of government. In civil liberates the involvement of
the government is when the liberty is in the process of possibly being taken away. An example of
civil liberties is the right to bear arms as well as the right to the jury trial. (cengage 2014) In civil
rights, the government is involved in making the rights happen. For example, adding the right
forAfrican Americans to vote and later on the right for women to vote. The government had to be
involved to create this right for the people. The Bill of Rights and the Constitution help in the
process of protecting the civil right and liberties. The supreme court has also aided in the protection
and addition of

Freedom or Liberty
Freedom and Liberty
Every day the federal government as well as state and local government pass laws to make us a safer
society. As they make society safer they are slowly chewing away at our rights, liberties, and
personal freedom. Where is the balance? A serf toiling away in a field had very little liberty. He
couldn't vote and didn't have any true freedom of speech or assembly. But he did have freedom to
think his own thoughts, and he was given by his creator the right to moral agency. Within his
confined world, he had the freedom to make choices, either good or bad. We now have laws
regulating everything. We are forced to wear seatbelts, to wear motorcycle helmets. Smokers can't
even smoke outside. Kids are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Thomas Jefferson)
It is the hopeful goal of liberty that citizens govern their government rather than the reverse. We
"The People" are charged with the protection of our liberties, and we should guard against
tyrannical figures imposing intended wills upon that of our own. To regenerate the process in today's
America, we must demand regulation of soft money in politics. Personal or corporate interests
cannot dominate the political landscape. If we truly believe that every voice has value, then we
cannot continue to give merit to special interests. As stated before, our legislature must be made of
the people and for the people. If we divert and move with speed to this end, then we truly we will
have government of the people and for the people.
But......if it wasn't for central government.....there would be no civil rights legislation, there would
be no title 9. We are now in the twenty first century, and the world has changed since 1776. And
there are prices to pay if the government is going to

Analysis Of Thomas Jefferson 's ' Land Of The Freedom And...
Thomas Jefferson quipped the most prolific line of American political theory in the first line of the
Declaration of Independence; "We hold these truths to be self–evident that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". The line represents the first utterance of a nation whose
longstanding history is chronicled by the stories of men and women coming to terms with and
expanding upon these endowed and eternal rights, creating a nation that strives to be fitting of the
title "Land of the free and home of the brave". Jefferson understood that this would be the task at
hand for future Americans and in anticipation of the inevitable debate and discussion that would
occur, even beyond his years, over the proper role of government and the rule of law he made sure
that his words would outlive him, offering a guiding light for future generations to govern and
protect our hard earned freedoms.
Turning back to that famous line, it is important to recognize its implications to properly reconstruct
and foster an understanding for Jefferson's system of political thought. To do this, we must first
consider whom Jefferson refers to when he says that "all men" are endowed with these divine rights
of freedom. Simply put, the line was meant to be interpreted as the idea that every individual citizen
of the United States is entitled to these rights which hasn't ever been

Analysis Of The Declaration Of Independence
Throughout history, mankind has had to make important decisions regarding the well–being of
themselves as well as the community. A crucial example of this type of matter in American history
can be found when looking at the Declaration of Independence. This monumental document
explained how the colonies have the right to revolt away from Great Britain based on the tyrannical
actions of the King. The founding fathers and the colonist believed they had a right to "abolish
political bands" when deemed necessary (128). These "rights" people are entitled to our questioned
by numerous people, whether they come from a creedal perspective or a cultural perspective. The
creedal perspective being of a philosophical background, while on the other hand, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first reason relating to history and how it's reoccurring. The founding fathers wrote, "The
history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of a repeated injuries and usurpations..."
(128). This shows that the Founders along with the colonist have realized that the King has been
unjust throughout his tenure as ruler of Great Britain. The King deprived the colonist of their natural
rights as he imposed unfit laws that governed them; leading to a feeling of disgust and resentment
for the King and Great Britain. The colonist felt that these laws trespassed against the rights they
had in Great Britain, resulting in a cultural movement of refining their rights. They realize that
actions like these need to be reprimanded and they need to break free. The colonists deem it as
"their right, it is their duty, to throw off unjust governments" (128). This looks to be cultural as they
have refined their previous notions and beliefs to accommodate the need to revolt. With this need,
they need to set up a government in which they all believe in. This government needs to be
"Instituted among men, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed." (128). This is
another example of refining prior beliefs as no government they have been accustomed to has been
this way. By changing their previous opinions, they have cultivated a new culture amongst the
colonies, showing how their influence was

Authors' Conceptions of Human Nature Essay
Authors' Conceptions of Human Nature
Philosophers, politicians, and writers throughout all of the western world and across all of our
written history have discovered the importance of knowing human nature. Human nature is
responsible for our definitions of abstract concepts that are surprisingly universal across the western
world like justice, equity, and law. Human nature must also be carefully studied in an effort to
understand, obtain, or maintain power within society. Finally, human nature must also be carefully
understood so as to protect it from being manipulated and to understand its place in society.
In ancient Greece, Aeschylus sought to define for the people of Athens the part of human nature that
necessitates ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the course of this struggle, the Furies argue that the actions of Orestes must be answered,
because consequences must be established for all punishable actions in order for a society to remain
stable. This need arises out of a basic understanding of human nature: people often only act justly
out of fear. The Furies remind Athena of this common behavior among humans:
Here is overthrow of all the young laws, if the claim of this matricide shall stand good, his crime be
sustained.
Should this be, every man will find a way to act at his own caprice; over and over again in time to
come, parents shall await the deathstroke at their children's hands. (Aeschylus 152)
The Furies disregard Athena's plea for understanding when reaching justice, instead, they reason
that when crimes remain unpunished, all people will lose their fear of committing similar actions
and will discontinue acting responsibly because there will be no consequences. Athena agrees with
the Furies and asks the question, "What / man who fears nothing at all is ever righteous?"
(Aeschylus 160). Athena then gives justification to the system of justice of the Furies and allows
them to be part of the justice system in Athens: "Such / be your just terrors, and you may deserve
and have / salvation for your citadel, / your land's defence" (160). Aeschylus moves from a
traditional justice system, the Furies, to the widely accepted justice system of

Compare/Contrast Thomas Jefferson and Jonathan Swift
There exists a fine line between the degree of responsibility a government has for its citizens, and
the control it assumes to ensure the proliferation of its power. While freedom may be a traditional
American value, how it is defined is a question that has long been a source of debate. Furthermore,
when an institution follows a course of action that becomes detrimental to society, what
responsibility, if any, do the citizens have to show their dissent, and what form should that dissent
take? All of these are questions looking to be answered, with varying degrees of seriousness, by
Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Swift. Thomas Jefferson's A Declaration of Independence may be
thought of as a universal symbol of traditional American values, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In the introduction Swift invokes the daily sight of poverty on the streets of Ireland, and how
families, "are forced to employ all of their time in strolling, to beg sustenance for their helpless
infants, who are, as they grow up, either turn thieves for want of work, or leave their dear native
country." While Swift opens with a strong sense of compassion, creating a sense of empathy in the
reader, his comments about woman as "breeders" and Irish who "fight for the pretender in Spain,"
give some insight into his mixed loyalties. The wretched description of poverty certainly creates a
need for change, but when Swift begins to attack the same poor people he claim need assistance, the
quality of his delivery is compromised and the reader loses some degree of emotional investment in
the story. Another important component of each work individually is the course of action the author
claims will be effective against their perceived source of tyranny. The Declaration of Independence,
having clearly labelled each offense committed by the king, culminates in a final paragraph of
action; the colonies claim to be "absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all
political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and out to be totally dissolved;
and that as Free and Independent States, they have full power to levy war, conclude

Frederick Douglass : The Consequences Of The Abolition...
America was built on the foundation of slavery. The White House was physically built by slaves and
by the mid–1800's the south's economy was completely based on the practice of chattel slavery,
despite its economic detriment. Even after the Civil War and the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments,
black Americans were unjustly kept from practicing their civil rights. In 1857 the Supreme Court
handed down the worst decision in its history: Dred Scott versus Sanford. The decision determined
that African Americans could never be citizens of the United States. This was one of the many
precursors to the Civil War and a highly motivating factor in the movement for abolition. The
Abolition movement had been stirring in America prior to the American Revolution and since. For
over 80 years, people had been calling for the practice of slavery to be removed from the country. It
was not until a bloody war and three constitutional amendments it occurred. At the same time,
another revolution was brewing: suffrage. These two movements were closely entangled and both
worked for each other's causes. However, after Frederick Douglas declared abolition must occur
before women's suffrage. Douglass was correct, abolition did need to occur before suffrage.
Ultimately, Douglass was correct in his assertion that women were not being hunted down and
murdered for running away from their husbands. The consequences for a failed abolition movement
were much higher than a failed suffrage movement. The major

Analysis Of Cry The Beloved County
``Paton's writing is the writing of voices. The voices rise with a deep sympathy for those who
struggle admits civil disharmony and division. ``Discuss the extent to which you think this is true of
the novel `Cry the beloved County`, paying particular attention to the style and form of Alan Paton's
writing. The paton also has some significant moments when the characters show voices of loss. A
important quote is: "Cry for the broken tribe, for the law and the custom that is gone. Aye, and cry
aloud for the man who is dead, for the woman and children bereaved. Cry, the beloved country,
these things are not yet at an end." By narrator. The structure and form Alan Paton is using in this
quote is effective because every single sentence is short so it makes the scene more dramatic
because he is able to say it quickly and create more tension. The "Aye" and "Cry" catches our
attention straight away because the voice is very hurt and feels pain it also gives the whole passage a
more dramatic way because it shows that the writer is feeling deep sympathy for the black
community. "Aye, and cry aloud for the man is dead" Allan Paton really intents us to experience a
voice of loss by crying for the dead man in a dramatic way because he also wants us to feel loss,
pain and sympathy for them. This shows again that the voice he is using wants us to feel sympathy
straight away by using words like "Aye" and "Cry". So this quotation agrees with the statement "The
voices rise with deep sympathy for those admits civil struggle." The quote "Cry for the broken tribe"
is important because as a result of that he is expressing in a crying voice the loss of the black
communities. This equally makes him feel sympathy for those people who are affected because he is
trying to make us feel sympathy too. When we read this we can almost hear him raising his voice to
tell us that we should cry for the tribes that have been broken and are going to be hard to rebuild.
The examples show that the voice feels sympathy and is crying for the loss of the broken tribes. This
shows again that Alan Paton is showing sympathy for the broken tribe and the civil black struggle.
He is outlining the crime and the struggle of young people who are

A Brief Biography of Benjamin Banneker
Inhumane degeneration of colored people by human trafficking had once lasted for two centuries in
America. Those trafficked by white people became slaves sold in auditions were strained and were
commonly abused by their masters. Slaves were compelled to perform vigorous labor everyday for
seven years in hope for a day that their master will release them. Benjamin Banneker was a son of a
former slave who had wrote a letter to ex–US Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson in hope for
Jefferson to take role in part of abrogating enslavement. Although Banneker was born as a free man,
his determination of resolving servitude had brought himself to construct a letter to Jefferson.
Through the use of emotional diction, tone, and religious allusion, Banneker emphasizes his passion
for freeing slaves of America. Banneker's word choice takes a large role in his letter as it show his
persuasive bold stance and emotional message to Jefferson. Banneker used bold and compelling
detailed phrases, in particular "I entreat you... your abhorrence thereof was so excited... how
pitiable... groaning captivity and cruel oppression" (Paragraphs 1–3) moves readers of the letter
responsively into feeling guilt and grief towards the ones enslaved. His word choice implies
formally that Jefferson, the man who wrote the Declaration of Independence who stated "all men are
created equal, and that they are endowed by their creator with unalienable rights" (Paragraph 2)
contradicted himself "you should at the same

Thomas Jefferson And The Second President Of The United...
As the third President of the United States of America, the author of the Declaration of
Independence, founder of the University of Virginia and a founding father of our great nation,
Thomas Jefferson had a lasting impact on the way we live our lives today in our great nation.
Jefferson throughout his life was known to keep his religious views to himself even once said "Say
nothing of my religion. It is known to God and myself alone." (Ragosta 7). Jefferson held this belief
firm throughout his life and believed that religious freedom was a natural right. This paper will
examine how Thomas Jefferson supported religious freedom, why he believed that no man should
be forced by the government to believe in a God or taxed to support a specific church, and the
impact of Jefferson's views.
Born April 13, 1743 Jefferson was baptised and raised in the Church of England otherwise known as
the Anglican Church, which was the church that citizens of America had to pay a tax to in order to
support. From a young age Jefferson was surrounded by the Church of England's methods,
ideologies and practices, following in his father 's footsteps he was also elected as a vestryman in
the Church of England. Additionally he married in the church as well as had his children baptized in
the church, and had the Episcopal minister officiate his funeral. However despite his lifelong
relationship with the Church of England Jefferson kept his religion to himself, in large due to the
fact that he proclaimed

The Importance Of A Social Society
MPV 5 "Man is by nature a social animal; an individual who is unsocial naturally and not
accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human. Society is something that precedes the
individual. Anyone who either cannot lead the common life or is so self–sufficient as not to need to,
and therefore does not partake of society, is either a beast or a god." ― Aristotle Creating a social
society is not only an acceptance of inalienable rights to those born under it, but an acceptance to
the unalienable punishments generated by disagreeing and going against those rights given to each
man woman and child. We collaborate to accomplish goals as a society and not as an individual for
when we work together as one united we transcend progress to better ourselves in the long run. We
no longer think of the short term goals as we do as individuals, but we revert to a subjective mindset
of one person, one interest, one goal. We regularly experience this throughout living in our
government today. Except many of us know, sometimes the government fucks us over for the good
of others. We might have set our minds too much so on the greater good, the overall well being that
we forget that individuals have their own personal well being. The social society we live in is in a
moral contradiction. We work and give to the society around us to ensure the favored freedom and
unalienable rights to the future members of the society. We here give much of ourselves and what
we own to the

The Criticism Of Civil Disobedience By Henry Thoreau
Civil Disobedience Henry Thoreau's literature resonates with movements of the twentieth century in
the United States and abroad. Although he did not advocate for a non–violent form of resistance to
civil government, his essay has been interpreted as a form of passive resistance from movements
around the world. Similar to Douglas, Thoreau writes against the injustice of slavery and the
despotism of government. His criticism of the Dred Scott decision by the Supreme Court, which did
not recognize the legal standing of a slave before the Court, exemplifies his questioning of the
Constitution as illegitimate authority. For Thoreau, the Constitution should be subjected to a test of
morality.
Thoreau begins argues government's authority should be limited. He begins his essay by stating that
"Government is best which governs least" since government becomes despotic with corruption. He
then writes, "Government is best which governs not at all," describing the same sentiment of civil
disobedience against the injustices of government. Thoreau makes the questions how practical
Government is since it does not pass the test of morality. Moreover, he makes a case against the
government's standing army as a failure to this test of morality. For Thoreau, the people execute
their will through the government and the government responds to them. Therefore, the people have
the right to disobey civil government since it draws its authority from the will of the people. His
criticism extends to

Declaration Of Happiness Research Paper
Happiness is a funny thing, because, unlike other emotions it relies so strongly on its polar opposite.
What is happiness without unhappiness? Whose happiness matters most?
We as humans like to live our lives in pursuit of hedonism. And like to judge situations based on the
utility it produces for ourselves, and if you're particularly altruistic, the utility of your loved ones.
We put such a high priority on being happy, that everything in our lives revolves around it. And we
don't often realize that our own happiness leads to others unhappiness. For example, Trump is
happy, because he attained a powerful position that he didn't deserve. Yet, the very thing that makes
him happy is causing immigrants stress, and fear, and unhappiness. Whose ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
We as humans tend to like instant gratification, but long term happiness often results because we do
things that make us less happy then, but will lead to more opportunity in the future. Hundreds of
thousands of people go to college for example. I for one know I dislike homework, and busy work,
which college is full of. Doing work lessens my happiness now, but later on in life completing
college will set me up for more opportunities. Because I completed college, I will have access to
better jobs, jobs that provide more security, security that allows me to live out my life with less
stress and worry, less stress that allows me to generally be much happier than I would have been if I
had graduated from high school and gone straight into a minimum wage job. Is the greater
happiness in the future worth the reduced happiness now? Am I happier now doing the work,
knowing I will accomplish something with my life, than I would be not doing the work at

The American Dream
The American Dream is an idea that has existed for more than a century as an idea of what we can
and should achieve, thanks to the freedoms supplied to us by our government. The first example of
this idea appears in our very own Declaration of Independence, where founding father Thomas
Jefferson wrote: "We hold these truths to be self–evident: that all men are created equal; that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and
the pursuit of happiness"(Jefferson). However, it wasn't until over 150 years later that Pulitzer Prize
winner James Truslow Adams defined The American Dream by stating "life should be better and
richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
It doesn't include children for all, but it does for many. It includes a college education, and it
includes a spouse. Nevertheless, this dream will continue to change over the years, depending on the
circumstances. For example, as jobs in manual labor went overseas and to Mexico, where labor was
less expensive for employers, Americans saw the added value in having an education and The
American Dream now includes college. Additionally, I believe that The American Dream has yet do
die. Perhaps that is because I'm from a well off white family, but I believe that with hard work,
going to college and becoming successful is an achievable goal. There certainly are societal barriers
and economic challenges that make it difficult for many Americans to succeed, but once someone
has a college education, success is not far off. Unfortunately, The American Dream is not as
achievable as many of us would like to believe. On the topic of college, only 32.5% of Americans
aged 25 and older have obtained a bachelors degree ("Educational Attainment in the United States:
2015"). Additionally, according to U.S. News & World Report, "Americans themselves would need
to earn $842 more per month to fulfill their own country's dream"(Soergel). Perhaps it is ideal that
the American Dream can only be fulfilled by a handful of our country's citizens, but this does not
bode

Huck and the Question of His Morality Essay
Throughout the book, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, the main character, Huck goes through
major changes. The story is set before the Civil War in the South. Huck is a child with an abusive
father who kidnaps him from, Widow Douglas and Miss Watson, the people he was living with. He
eventually escapes from his father and finds Jim, Miss Watson's runaway slave. As Huck travels
with Jim, Huck begins to realize that Jim is more than a piece of property. During the travel down
the river, Huck makes many decisions that reflect his belief that Jim deserves the same rights he has.
Because of these realizations, Huck chooses to do the right thing in many instances. Some of these
instances where Huck does the right thing instead of society's ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They see a town and decide Huck should go and see if this town is Cairo. Huck plans to give up Jim
when they get to the city but Jim says, "Huck; you's be de bes' fren' Jim's ever had; en you's de only
fren' ole Jim's got now" (Twain 135). Huck struggles with whether or not he will turn Jim in. As
Huck is paddling to the shore, he meets a few men who want to search his raft for escaped slaves.
Huck concocts an elaborate lie and acts grateful to the men, saying no one else will help them. He
convinces the men that his family on that raft has smallpox. The men, deathly afraid of smallpox,
leave Huck forty dollars out of pity and leave. Here, Huck actively decides not to turn Jim in. Huck
gets closer to realizing that Jim is a person that deserves rights. Huck struggles between what he
thinks is right and what society thinks is right. Huck starts to think for himself, branching out from
what society has told him to do from when he was a boy. This is a great leap for Huck in his
growing maturity and morality. A third example of Huck's growing maturity is when he tore up the
letter he wrote to Miss Watson. In this part of the story, Jim has been captured by some farmers, the
Phelps. Huck decides to write to Tom Sawyer to tell Miss Watson where Jim is. Huck, despite
believing it was wrong, Huck tears up the letter. "'All right, then, I'll go to hell'–and tore it up"
(Twain 321). Despite believing that he was wronging Miss Watson by

Critique Of The Doctrine Of Inalienable, Natural Rights Essay
In "Critique of the Doctrine of Inalienable, Natural Rights", Jeremy Bentham aims to show the
reader why the Declaration of Rights is a troubling and terrible document, or as he describes it, a
"dangerous nonsense". In his critique, Bentham describes natural rights as "nonsense upon stilts"
and says they do not exist, but they are actually made up. He then goes on to attack the Declaration's
vagueness and contradictions, saying it will lead to constant unrest. The Declaration, Bentham says,
is condoning revolution and giving grounds for permanent revolution and by doing this, they
diminish the roles of government and other future authority. Despite a few confusions, Bentham's
argument is successful because he proves the Declaration is full of confusions and contradictions
that can lead to dangerous acts. Natural rights are something we should have, but they are not
"natural" and instead made–up, as Bentham suggests.
In Bentham's preliminary observations, he calls out the overall problems of the Declaration. A huge
problem with the Declaration is that since it is vague, it is essentially never–ending dangerous
nonsense (p.2). Words can have many different meanings so if you aren't specific, you can confuse
people. In this case, confusion can lead to destruction. Its lack of specific guidelines is troubling.
The people who speak of natural rights do not know what they're talking about, but they still go on
about how their rights cannot be taken away from them and they

Slavery In The Bible: Is Freedom A Right?
Freedom: A Right? "We hold these truths to be self–evident, that all men are created equal, that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and
the pursuit of Happiness" (US 1776). Every American knows these words, and few question them.
But is this equality as obvious as it seems at first? Is this Biblical truth, or is it born of the
Enlightenment philosophies that so inspired the Founding Fathers? This is Biblical truth. God did
indeed create all men, and women, equal, and gave them all rights. If this is so, why, then, does God
put provisions for slavery in the Bible? Although the Old Testament permitted slavery in some
circumstances, it certainly does not condone it. In the Old Testament, a few laws are set out on
slaves. "When you buy a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Slaves, obey in everything those who are your earthly masters... Masters, treat your slaves justly
and fairly, knowing that you also have a Master in heaven" (Colossians 3:22, 25 ESV). In Philemon
it says that Paul sent Onesimus, an escaped slave, back to his master Philemon, "no longer as a slave
but more than a slave, as a beloved brother" (Philemon 16 ESV). Matthew 7:12 (ESV) says, "So
whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the
Prophets." Although these verses say clearly that slaves should not insurrect, it is also clear,
especially in the last two verses, that slavery is bad and should not be part of society. Freedom is
indeed a Biblical topic, but in the era before the Enlightenment, people mostly just accepted the
traditions they were taught. The Enlightenment encouraged people to think for themselves. That led
to people examining the Bible, not just accepting whatever they were told about God's truth. In turn,
people started expressing Biblical principles such as freedom. The Enlightenment did not create
these concepts; it merely spread and "popularized"

Meaning Of Happiness
There's no question that everyone wants to be happy within their lives. The only source of
disagreement lies within how one achieves happiness and what happiness really means. The authors
within the book Pursuing Happiness have their own meanings of happiness and what it takes to
achieve happiness. Topics such as: what happiness is, what brings happiness, what role does money
play in happiness, etc. In this first discussion, we see what the some of the authors have to say about
the meaning of happiness. Someone such as his Holiness the Dalai Lama would argue that
happiness is having peace and satisfaction within one's mind. As a tibetan monk, he believe that
happiness occurs within the self (Dalai Lama and Cutler 23). In contrast, Thomas Jefferson would
explain that happiness is actually the opportunity to freely choose one's path within life. Freedom, in
eyes, would be the embodiment of freedom (Declaration of Independence). In would also argue that
happiness stems from the feeling of self–worth, that you have a place within this world. As we see
here, the "true" meaning of happiness all depends on the person. There is no right or wrong answer
because we each perceive happiness in a different manner. This is important because it also means
that there are different opinions in which someone can achieve happiness. When it comes to
achieving happiness, there are two things to consider; physical and spiritual. Some people believe
that happiness can come from material

The Burgermeister's Daughter Essay Topics
Steven Ozment. The Burgermeisters Daughter. New York: Harper Collins, 1996. Pp. 227.
The Burgermeister's Daughter, written by Steven Ozment, illustrates the scandalous life of a young
woman in sixteenth century Germany. Anna Buschler, the burgermeister's daughter, lived a
troublesome life in the German city of Schwabisch Hall, where she spent the majority of her life,
while still moving from town to town. While the book surrounds the life of Anna Buschler, it also
gives insight to many other historical topics going on in the time of her life, which feed into the
reasoning of how Anna was treated. While the book at the beginning shows the mishaps and
discourages Anna's wrongdoings, we later find out many topics of discussion which led her ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because her father had such a high standing and proud nature within the city, Anna's romances with
the two men were sought to be terminated by both her father as well as these other councilmen.
Anna was also accused of stealing from her father, taking money, wine, and sold other possessions
of his for a sum of money in order to buy things for herself, and keep her rendezvous with her lovers
a secret. "And her father and brother were the ones who discovered, confiscated, and preserved the
extremely rare cache of her love letters" (3). This was ultimately the fall of Anna's character, as her
father then attacked her, banished her from his home, and took away her inheritance, which would
start the legal battle with her father and other family members for many years to come (2). Anna
would take this court case to her grave as it would never be settled, and she would go through many
misfortunes while trying to gain the legal right to her inheritance. From birth till around the time her
mother died, Anna Buschler lived a normal life as the daughter of a wealthy bourgeoisie class
member. Through the research of Anna's life, Ozment was able to tell of how previous to her
engagements with her father, she lived a routine life, sent to learn how to run a household in which
would be suitable for her future husband

The Declaration Of Independence : Freedom, Liberty, And...
The Declaration of Independence affirms that the country is founded upon the principles of life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. However, the Democratic and Republican Parties do not
always uphold these ideas in their decisions regarding social issues. The Democratic party believes
in Protecting the lives of inmates, allowing women to choose whether or not to have an abortion,
and support LGBT rights. While the Republican Party's ideals consist of allowing the death penalty,
being pro–life, and not supporting the rights of the LGBT community. We almost must remember to
integrate our faith into the decisions we make by electing people who support those who uphold
biblical ideology. The Democratic Party best upholds the natural rights given to us because they
support life sentences rather than the death penalty, the right to choose to have an abortion, and the
rights of the LGBT community, which comes closest to the principles of the Declaration of
Independence. We must first determine what is being said in the constitution when they wrote, "We
hold these truths to be self–evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness." Analyzing this we can see that Locke was stating that everyone is equal, and is born
with certain "inalienable" natural rights. These rights are given to us by God and can never be taken
or even given away by any force,

Piracy Case Study Piracy
Our Case Study defined in the Learning Journal this week is entitled "Pirates." We are to discuss
Locke 's Treatise on "Of Property" with regards to this case study, along with the readings assigned.
Case Study – Pirates
The case study, entitled "Pirates," is an online forum on the subject of CD burning and the
comments therein. The protagonist initiating the dialogue has an issue burning, or creating, a copy
of a CD. Within this case study there are four comments, as well as many others within the forum as
a whole. Subsequently, the conversation within the forum brings up various queries (and answers)
related to the burning procedure, the type of burner, and the burning software program itself, along
with questions related to the legality ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What does this mean? Universal rights are those which are unchangeable no matter how you change
or where you are in the world. Equal rights means they are the same for all people. Inalienable rights
are absolute, non–transferable, hereditary, deep–rooted, and instinctive. They can 't be bought or
sold, they just "are." What are my rights? According to Brusseau, rights include, but are not limited
to, the right to life, freedom, free speech, religious freedom, possessions, and the pursuit of
happiness (2013). And to remember, the right to freedom, as long as mine do not encroach,
supersede, or cancel out, the freedom belonging to someone else.
John Locke, Chapter V, "Of Property"
Who is John Locke? He was an English philosopher from the 17the century on "whose works lie at
the foundation of modern philosophical empiricism and political liberalism" (Rogers, 2015). John
Locke 's Second Treatise, entitled "Of Property," deals with property and explains how one can
attain private property.
First, the earth is God–given to the people. It is given to all of mankind, as is, to share, as a means of
support, nourishment, sustenance, and life. It is given freely and is a gift to one–and–all alike. Each
has an equal right to the resources and natural elements of the lands. Not knowing God 's full plans
for mankind, man expands on these gifts from God, and in doing so, further increases his service to
God.
There is no private property. Thus, the question is, how does one then obtain

Historical Account of African-Americans Seeking the...
Historical Account of African–Americans Seeking the American Dream
The American Dream began as a vision for the men who framed the Declaration of Independence
and the Constitution of the United States of America. These two documents provided the foundation
upon which the American Dream was built. The reality of the American Dream translated into a
nightmare for the African–Americans who had to overcome slavery in order to achieve the ideal that
all men are created equally. Their dream did not become a reality with the signing of the Declaration
of Independence; in fact, even after slavery was abolished, there was no concrete date established
that mandated that whites and African–Americans were equal. The law said the slaves were free; ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The original document argues against the commerce, which supported removing people from distant
lands and "carrying them into slavery" (731). The representatives called slavery an "assemblage of
horrors", yet they managed to strike the nightmare from their blueprint (732). By removing this
definition, the Declaration simply states that all men are created equal: thus begins the American
Dream with a contradiction that would last for years.
The Declaration of Independence established an ideal of equality that African–Americans would
have to work to overcome for many years, even after slavery was abolished. After their
independence, theoretically, all men were considered equal in the United States by law; yet it would
take a century and a civil rights movement to achieve equality. The African–American portion of the
American Dream seems to reconnect to the American Dream of the past as African–Americans
search to build their own future and attain their own American Dream. In 1963, Martin Luther King,
Jr. delivered a famous speech at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., where he plainly stated
his reconnection to the American Dream:
When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the
Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to
fall

Rhetorical Analysis On Civil Disobedience
Civil Disobedience Similar to Douglas, Thoreau writes against the injustice of slavery and the
despotism of government. Thoreau starts his essay by stating that "Government is best which
governs least" since government becomes despotic with corruption. He further adds in his essay
"Government is best which governs not at all" with the same sentiment of civil disobedience against
the injustices of government. For that reason Thoreau makes the argument that Government not
practical because it does not pass the test of morality.
Moreover, Thoreau's repudiation of the government's standing army is why the government fails this
test of morality. For Thoreau, government is the mode by which people execute their will.
Therefore, it is the people who have the right to disobey civil government because it draws its
strength from the will of the majority. His criticism extends to the power of the strong, since the
power of the strong does not translate to the justice and question the people's resignation of their
rights to the legislator.
Lastly, Thoreau argues that government lost some of its integrity. For Thoreau, when the tyranny
becomes great and unendurable, men have the right to revolution and the right to refuse their
allegiance and resist government. Even voting for the right is doing nothing for it according to
Thoreau. Even in his criticism of voting, Thoreau expresses that people would vote to abolish
slavery once they feel indifferent about it. Furthermore, Thoreau considered the Constitution a form
of human law based on moral principle. Therefore, the Constitution should not subject people to
relinquish their natural rights, and men should resist civil government in return.
Bartelby
In agreement with Thoreau's philosophy of civil disobedience, Melville argues about the political
consequences for resisting government through his story of Bartelby. This character illustrates the
connection between Fredrick Douglas' life as a slave to the system that turned him into a machine.
Bartelby's story as an scrivener, narrates the life of a man who becomes aggravated with the system
in place, and disobeys the orders of his master the lawyer.
Evidenced by his refusal to work, Bartelby seals his fate as he faces

Rhetorical Analysis Of King 's ' King '
I. Thesis: King brilliantly applies rhetorical strategies such as pathos, logos and ethos that are crucial
in successfully influencing detractors of his philosophical views on civil disobedience. II. Topic
Sentence: King uses logos to object the Clergymen 's claim that the peaceful actions taken by the
protestors precipitate violence. A. King proves that the Clergymen 's assertion about his Civil Right
Movements are illogical. King does it by relating their statement to the act of robbery. B. King
states, "Isn't this like condemning a robbed man because his possession of money precipitated the
evil act of robbery?"(King 5). C. King starts his argument by comparing the demonstration to the
robbed man, which is a strong way to classify the victim. Based on the Clergymen 's assertion, the
robbed man is the criminal because of his possession of money precipitate crime. D. King aligns
victim of the robbery with the African–American protestors 'demonstration to logically appeal to the
readers that just because an action might trigger an illegal act, it does not mean that the action
should be censured. Instead, the one who commits the crime should be punished. Similar the robbed
man, the demonstrations should not be condemned because they precipitate violence. Not only since
they are peaceful, but even if there is violence, only those who cause it should be penalized. E.

Essay on Civil Liberties
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, all of which are our God given rights as stated in the
"Declaration of Independence" by Thomas Jefferson in 1776. Liberty is my main focus for this
essay. Liberty as defined in the American Heritage Dictionary as "the condition of being free from
restriction or control, and the right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's
own choosing." As Americans we have never quite been truly liberated. The government has always
had some sort of laws and regulations to restrict and control us from total liberty.
First of all, my connotation of liberty is very similar to that of the main denotation of the term
liberty. It is that everyone, no matter what race or gender you ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Now I thought that everyone was created equal in this country, but I was wrong. Women were
looked down upon and thought to be inferior to men for a long time but over time woman have
proven themselves to be just as capable of doing almost all of the same things as men. Maybe some
things even a little better than men. Elizabeth stated that once women got married, they were not
allowed to own property or even collect the wages that they earned. This was all given to the
husband, and if they should get a divorce the children were given to their mothers. How could she
support and feed them if she could not get a decent job or collect the money that she had rightfully
earned? I think that this was preposterous. Just because someone is of a different gender does not
mean that they should not be entitled to the same liberties and rights as everyone else. Sojourner
Truth made a great point in "Ain't I a Woman?" when she said, "he says women can't have as much
rights as men, `cause Christ wasn't a woman! Where did your Christ come from? Where did your
Christ come from? From God and a woman! Man had nothing to do with Him." This shows that
even if you do not believe women should have the same liberties as men that women have played an
important role in our history and should be given credit. The credit is well

The Rights of Women in 18th Century America Essay
The Rights of Women in 18th Century America
On July 4, 1804, a group of young men in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, offered a series of toasts to
commemorate the nation's independence. Among their testimonials, they offered one to a cherished
ideal:"[To] the rights of men, and the rights of women–. May the former never be infringed, nor the
latter curtailed." The men acknowledged, even celebrated, an innovative and controversial idea:
women along with men should be regarded as the bearers of rights. But why were women denied to
bear their own rights?
"Let the defenders of male despotism answer (if they can) the Rights of Women" Just as the rights of
man took on new meanings over time––meanings the American Revolutionaries had not ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Discrimination against women throughout much of American history was caused by the prevalence
of a masculine system of justice based on English common law" (Hoff–Wilson). "The development
of the republican ideal as an autonomous, patriotic male citizen, proud of his maturity and
independence, left women cast in the opposite role of dependent, unreliable, and weak" (Kerber).
"The rights of humanity," Wollstonecraft asserted, "have been...confined to the male line from Adam
downwards,: with the result that half of the population was kept from realizing its full human
potential. They found that limitations on women's liberty was too controversial so they decided
women did not need liberty. Why are general rights being decided solely from a male's prerogative?
Were men so intimidated by the thought of women possibly making an impact by voicing their own
opinions and taking over their roles that they had to degrade women and not give them any other
option but to remain submissive housewives forever?
For a brief period this all changed. During the American Revolution, the men went off to fight in the
war and in turn, the women were handed the reigns and were running the show for once...although
temporarily. The women took on their husband's difficult tasks and were inspired to know that they
actually did have the capability to run a household independently, and wondered what else they
were being

What Did The Declaration Declare? By Joseph J. Ellis
In What Did the Declaration Declare?, Joseph J. Ellis, an editor for history publications presents
various historical perceptions on the analytical conception of this mythic text of American public
life. The Declaration of Independence has enjoyed a long and useful career as an expression of
"natural rights," providing Americans with an influential statement of their national
doctrine. Thomas Jefferson had no reason to believe that he was writing a document that would
become so revered throughout the ages. One may confirm the Declaration's idealistic origins by
examining Carl Becker's enduring argument that the Declaration was an American product of the
doctrines of John Locke. The Declaration was composed for a specific ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In summary, the Declaration of Independence gives hope and a feeling of security to the people of
the United States of America. It went through many changes, beginning from a simple draft to an
edited piece that impacted the Nation as a whole. Jefferson wrote the first draft of the Declaration,
but Congress edited and perfected this historical document to create a tactful and eloquent
Declaration, which would remain a part of our country day–to–day philosophy throughout the
course of history up to modern day times.
Thomas Jefferson, during May and June of 1776, served on committees and dealt mostly with the
affairs of Canada. Naturally, he was more concerned with the welfare of Virginia, which was his
home. He began drafting a Constitution for his own Commonwealth and included specific charges
against King George III (Ellis 29). Jefferson had a history dealing in the politics of the colonies. He
was very well informed on the proceedings within the colonies and this helped him to have a clear
objective of the colonial procedures. As Dumas Malone said in his book titled, Jefferson the
Virginian, "At all events, it was inevitable that a Virginian should be appointed to the committee [to
draft up

The Declaration Of The Rights Of Man And Citizen
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, adopted in 1789 by the National Assembly,
explicitly defines "the natural, unalienable, and sacred rights of man" (Declaration, p. 1). Two
philosophers, Jeremy Bentham and Karl Marx, object the document, especially its usage of natural
rights, by presenting different arguments against its language and function. Bentham centers his
argument around the Declaration's promotion of anti–legal rights and its vagueness in description in
his essay "Anarchical Fallacies." Marx criticizes the Declaration's perpetuation of social alienation
and for not pursuing human emancipation in "On the Jewish Question." Of the two arguments, Marx
presents a better and more convincing argument than Bentham. Marx advocates for complete human
emancipation beyond political emancipation whereas Bentham does not go beyond the criticism of
the legislators, of their use of language and design, as opposed to the law itself. Bentham
encapsulates his entire argument against the Declaration by saying "natural rights is simple
nonsense, –nonsense upon stilts" (Nonsense, 53). Throughout his entire essay, Bentham actively
argues the rhetorical nonsense throughout which the Declaration uses. The basis behind his
argument is that rights cannot exist without law. The Declaration contradicts this by asserting that
human beings are naturally born with a set of inalienable rights that may not be infringed upon by
anyone else. He writes, "That there are no such things

The Constitution Essay
Forming a new nation with its own values and beliefs was a very daunting task. It was supremely
difficult when the members of the nation were holding on to the beliefs of the old ruling country. It
was believed that to be a leader you had to be in the upper classes, a so called aristocrat. To be an
aristocrat you had to posses large sums of land and property. Property was not in the sense we think
of today. Back then, slaves were also considered property. So the vast majority of our leaders owned
slaves. In fact George Mason, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison owned
over four hundred slaves between themselves. This proves to be very odd since these are the leaders
who fought for equal rights for all men.
George ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This, however, also allowed slavery to remain in existence. This made it to where fleeing slaves
could be tracked down and brought back to their owners. This is very strange to be written if these
same men wrote, "We hold these truths to be self–evident: that all men are created equal; that they
are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty & the
pursuit of happiness..."
It should say that: All men, except for these Persons, are created equal. It is clear that they meant
every man is equal except for the slave.
George Washington often referred to slaves as "the species of property." He clearly demonstrates his
view of slaves inferiority in this statement. He made himself above the law so that he could keep his
slaves. In Pennsylvania a law had been passed which stated that slaves were to be freed six months
after their owner had moved into the state. Washington resided in Pennsylvania but was still a
citizen of Virginia. This allowed Washington to bypass the law and keep his slaves. He feared that
his slaves being around this law might give them an idea above their station. Washington was afraid
that his slaves might think they had the right to freedom.
Just prior to learning of this law in

Why I Want to Be a Lawyer
It wasn't always like this. I didn't grow up intending to one day become a lawyer, and I didn't meet
some famous politician who inspired me to follow their foot steps. But I certainly don't have to tell
you that, my high school and junior high curriculum can. Usually any free space in my schedule
would be filled with incompatible oddities, some of which include: computer aided drafting,
journalism, yearbook, acting, etcetera. In actuality, I grew up despising politics due to my internal
belief that they were naturally polluted or tained by the blood of the innocent people politicians
corrupted and reigned over. Growing up in the late 20th century and the continuation of the 21st
ultimately brought with it some needed change and with it my own. Eventually, I was presented
with the question we all fret as adolescents, "what do you want to do in this world?" and as a
response I looked around to find the answer and I saw a puzzle. For a long time nothing seem to fit
and all my talents felt out of place. However, I found that the things I came to love were not the
answer but the tools that would help put my future together. Through my love for art, history, and
language, I was able to see the importance of the "details" within not only my own life but the life of
those around me. The things we came to live for and to love were not simply given to us but were
once fought for and had now become our unalienable rights. Looking back at the darker aspects of
life I saw poverty and

Dr. King 's I Have A Dream Speech
On August twenty–eight, 1963, thousands of individuals gathered in Washington, DC throughout the
advance Washington monument wherever Dr. Theologian King gave the famed "I Have a Dream"
speech, that was recognized for collecting supporters of integration and prompted the 1964 Civil
Rights Act. Dr. King's speech was staggeringly vital throughout this era and these days, as a result
of he spoke concerning the injustices of racism, segregation, and discrimination of African
Americans during this nation, that still exist these days. Dr. King knew his speech would resonate
and serve a purpose for modification during this nation for hundreds of years to come back, as he
began his speech and said: "I am happy to join with you all today in what ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He had the simplest way of exploitation attribute, pathos, and logos in his speech and was a master
at exploitation and 5 canons of rhetoric; invention, arrangement, style, delivery, and memory.
Dr. King used attribute and references throughout his speech to assist sway the audience, his
experience, knowledge, and knowledge that helped more strengthen his arguments. During Dr.
King's speech, he raised the influence of United States President and his own views on civil rights
and therefore the modification to come back. He commemorated the previous president and
expressed "A great American, in which whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the
emancipation proclamation." He stated the freeing Proclamation to mention that it gave hope to
Negros, for the liberty of slaves however it wasn't enough as a result of Negros were still not free.
His recognition additionally showed his use of attribute as a result of Lincoln was a person of power
and a noteworthy president WHO sceptered the Yankee folks throughout the war and fought for
freedom and equality. Also, several Americans viewed United States President as a job model, and
by referencing him he convinced the audience to want they were fighting for an identical cause in
seeking modification.
Dr. King additionally mentioned the Declaration of Independence and honored the writers of the
Constitution. "This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white

The Racial Contract And Sexual Contract Affect Poverty
Tania Rodriguez Professor Myers HIS101–07 Exam What is resentment? How is resentment related
to the emergence of racism and sexism? Resentment is not wanting others to have what they have or
what you don?t have. There are various ways of how resentment is linked to racism and sexism. For
example, resenting a certain race can be caused just by seeing that they are doing better than you.
Similarly, there is a link of resentment in sexism. Some men may resent the fact that there has been
a shift in women status, from being a housewife to being independent. Some men may resent
women for working in jobs that are considered male dominated, especially if they hold a higher
position. Even now women are still struggling against that old fashion mentality that they are
inferior, unequal to men. How do the racial contract and sexual contract affect poverty? Using
Howard Zinn or other class readings, provide specific examples of what Mill calls: An expropriation
contract An exploitation or slavery contract a domination or colonial contract Some ways that the
racial contract affect poverty is the ?color–coded distribution of wealth?.1 Most of the worlds
wealth is controlled by whites.1 The sexual contract can correlate with poverty in which some
societies are male dominated and there is a concept of domination and subordination.2 There are
those who want to oppress others through financial means. The sexual contract can also affect
poverty in which employment can depend on physical

Diversity in Three Voices
Diversity in Three Voices Scientist When working with individuals from different cultures,
individuals informally learn the differences that exist between them and their respective cultures
(DeCenzo & Silhanek, 2001, p. 29). Often the word "diversity" is confused with political
correctness or human equality but it is the understanding of differences between people and how
they interact. Diversity is defined as the quality of being different but composed of distinct elements
or qualities (Parvis, 2005, p. 15). Throughout history the United States has been known as the
"melting pot," but this concept was a perception not a reality because the melting pot ended up
benefiting only white, prominent settlers. Looking at diversity is observing differences and there are
a lot of them. For example, male versus female, religion versus no religion, homosexual versus
heterosexual, foreign or domestic, republican versus democrat, Caucasian versus African American,
Mexican versus Latino, Cherokee Indian versus Choctaw Indian, poor versus rich; and differences
could encompass several more pages. We can deny that differences exist or we can consent to
differences while discovering from others the assets of dissimilarity. People must learn, therefore, to
recognize differences in others – their backgrounds, customs, and work schedules – and appreciate,
even celebrate, those differences (DeCenzo & Silhanek, 2001, p. 29). Artist When it is blatantly
obvious that you don't fit it with

A Perfect World Is Not A Linear Path Of Progress Essay
In a perfect world, history would be a linear path of progress. We would be able to see all events or
periods of time as moving us forward. History would be logical, a simple string of cause and effect
that leads to our present. But humans are far from logical and therefore our history is far from
simple. Human history is convoluted and progress is slow. We often go backwards before forwards.
Yet we often let these details of struggle and regression get ironed over for the sake of a smooth and
idealized narrative. A perfect example of this monolithic view of history, is the portrayal of
American slaveries. The story seems to be a simple one. Africans were shipped to the Americas.
They all became slaves. They were always seen as inferior because of their skin color. This is a
story that ignores the fact that there were places in the United States pre–eighteenth century in
which blacks were not only free, but owned land and had legal rights. This is a story that ignores the
fact that chattel slavery was something that came after a period in which blacks could obtain their
freedom. But how could we teach the children of America a story in which a huge percentage of the
population had more access to Thomas Jefferson's inalienable rights before the Declaration of
Independence than right after it? How could we teach them the truth? The truth that the black people
that found themselves in Northampton county in the mid–seventeenth century had a wide range of
opportunities that could

Argumentative Essay On Abortion
Abortion
Abortion had been legal since the time the earliest settlers had arrived. During the time the
constitution was made, women had abortions before she could feel the movement of her fetus which
was openly publicized and commonly performed. After the ruling of Roe V. Wade in 1973, women
had the right to legal abortion in all states; however, while supporters of the legal abortion felt that
they had won the battle, the level of anti–abortion violence had escalated. To this day, the morality
and ethics of abortion are still questioned. Pro–life believers understand life begins at fertilization
and that abortion is considered murder to innocent life. Pro–choice believers uphold that a woman
has the right and control over her own body. Others have opinions across the spectrum, depending
on the scenario that resulted in the fertilization of the child such as sexual assault or when it is a risk
to the mother's life. I believe life begins at conception; therefore, an unborn baby has just as equal
rights to life as a born baby that must be protected from harm.
Nearly 1.3 million abortions occur every year. Women have the right, as an individual, to choose
what is best for their body and decide whether or not they should have children. While a small
percentage of women who choose to have abortions do so because of health concerns or fetal
abnormalities, a majority of mothers choose termination in response to an unintended pregnancy.
Two most common reasons for abortions, according to a study done in 2004, were dramatic life
changes and financial instability of having an offspring (cited by 74% and 73%, respectively).
Furthermore, America provides many opportunities for at–risk families, especially when they are
preparing to have a newborn. Programs, such as Medicaid and WIC (the Women, Infants, and
Children program), help to provide education, various forms of healthcare, job assistance, and even
childcare that can tremendously help families. If a woman is pregnant with an unwanted baby,
adoption is significantly more humane than abortion. Adoption is an alternative solution to many
individuals and couples who are seeking to be parents. Not only is it beneficial

A Writ Petition By People 's Union For Civil Liberties Essay
A writ petition was filed by People's Union for Civil Liberties in the Apex Court on Right to Food.
The petition was filed when the food stocks in the country reached extraordinary levels on the other
hand the starvation in the areas which were affected by the drought was getting magnified. The
petition at first instance had Government of India, six State Governments and Food Corporation of
India were the respondent but later all the states were added since the matter reached at that level
where the hunger death became persistent in most of the states. Then considering the graveness of
the situation a PIL was filed, PUCL v. UOI and others, Writ Petition (Civil) 196 of 2001. The
fundamental argument in the petition was that the government is failing to provide the adequate
food in the drought situations even when there is a large quantity of food stock in the cold storages
and also there is negligence by the state since there is complete collapse in the services provided by
the PDS and also the relief fund is insufficient to deal with the drought situation. The relief
requested from the Supreme Court was a) that the employment be provided in the drought affected
villages, b) a relief should be given to the people who are unable to work, c) the PDS should be
made efficient in the areas, d) the families should be provided with the subsidized food grains and
the grains should be provided by the Central Government. The arguments put forward by the NHRC
in the proceedings over

African American Dream Research Paper
Lao Tzu once said that "the journey of a thousand miles begins with one step", which means that no
matter how difficult the task, determination requires a necessary prelude for accomplishment (Tzu).
People generally perceive accomplishments as the most important aspect of an individual's value,
but ultimately, only oneself can determine their worth and beliefs. The fading of one's ideals is
bound to occur eventually, but the only legacies considered inerasable are deeds. Great men and
women are rarely remembered for their beliefs or thoughts; instead they are judged depending on
their actions and the resulting consequences. The convictions that humans accept are meaningless
without the actions that instigate and perpetuate the belief. For ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, awareness of Adolph Hitler's role in Germany's devastating mass genocide is
exceedingly commonplace. However, familiarity with the fact that Hitler viewed his actions as
wholly justified is much less frequent. To Kill a Mockingbird adequately articulates the idea that the
thoughts of others cease to hold importance because "when it's a white man's word against a black
man's, the white man always wins" (Lee 187). Not a single juror believed that Robinson committed
the crime, but rather than dealing with the social ramifications of Mayella and Tom's relationship,
they gave Tom the death penalty. Clearly, an action is much more important than the reasoning
behind it. Sometimes even though a person has astonishing objectives, it means almost nothing if
their execution is inadequate. Even Thomas Jefferson, a great founding father, failed to make his
actions as spectacular as his beliefs. Though he coined the phrase "all men are created equal",
Thomas Jefferson's beliefs only applied to whites, meaning his actions failed to reach the full extent
of his ideals (Jefferson 167). Jefferson demonstrates the idea of how actions speak louder than
words; he supposedly endorsed equality, even though he treated humans as a commodity by owning

Benjamin Banneker on Slavery in America
Discrimination and degeneration of different races had once lasted for two centuries in America.
Those trafficked by white people became slaves sold in auctions were commonly abused by their
masters. Slaves were compelled to perform labor everyday for seven years until they are released.
Benjamin Banneker was son of a former slaves, a man who wrote a letter Thomas Jefferson
regarding to the possibility to abolish slavery. Through the use of emotional diction, tone, and
religious allusion, Banneker emphasizes his idea of freeing slaves of America. Banneker's word
choice takes a large role in his letter considering how it represents his bold stance and idea to
Jefferson. Banneker used compelling detailed phrases in his sentences, in particular "I entreat you
on the variety of dangers to which you were exposed" (Line 4), "It was now, sir, that your
abhorrence thereof was so excited, that you publickly held forth this true and valuable doctrine,"
(Line 17), "But, sir, how pitiable is it to reflect that although you were so fully convinced of the
benevolence of the Father of mankind and of his equal and impartial distribution of those rights and
privileges which he had conferred upon them" (Line 30), "That you should at the same time
counteract his mercies in detaining by fraud and violence so numerous a part of my brethren under
groaning captivity and cruel oppression"(Line 35). The phrases, "I entreat you" (Line 4), "your
abhorrence thereof was so excited" (Line 17), "how

Founding Fathers' Vision For Future Generations

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Wendy Boyd

More from Wendy Boyd (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Founding Fathers' Vision For Future Generations