Syllabuses and Coursebook
Tedy Nurmansyah
Aulia Novi Hapsari
Asty Asmarani Putri
Anggita Nurhandayani
Vevi Wulansari
Gugum Gumilar
Syllabuses Design
Syllabus design concerns the selection of items to be learnt and the grading of
those items into an appropriate sequence. The designer is concerned not just with
lists of what will be taught and in what order, but also with the planning,
implementation, evaluation, management and administration of education programs.
whatever type it is, every syllabus needs to be developed on the basis of certain
criteria, such as ‘learnability’ and ‘frequency which can inform decisions about
selection and ordering.
Syllabus design criteria
• Learnability
• Frequency
• Coverage
• Usefulness
Syllabus design criteria
• Learnability
Some structural or lexical items are easier for students to learn there
others.
Frequency
It would make sense especially at beginning levels, include items which
are more frequent in the language, than ones that are only used
occasionally by native speakers.
Syllabus design criteria
• Coverage
Some words and structures have greater coverage (scope for use)
than others.
• Usefulness
The reason that words like book an pen figure so highly in
classroom (even though the might not be that frequent in real
language use)
DIFFERENT SYLLABUSES
• The Grammar Syllabus
• The Lexical Syllabus
• The Functional Syllabus
• The Situational Syllabus
• The Topic-Based Syllabus
• The Task-Based Syllabus
DIFFERENT SYLLABUSES
• The Grammar Syllabus
This is the commonest type of syllabus, both traditionally and currently.
• The Lexical Syllabus
It is possible to organize a syllabus on the basis of vocabulary and lexis
to create a lexical syllabus.
• The Functional Syllabus
It was included categories of communicative function. These language
function are events which do thing such as inviting, promoising and
offering.
DIFFERENT SYLLABUSES
• The Situational Syllabus
It is offers the possibility of selecting and sequencing different real-life
situations rather than different grammatical items, vocabulary topics.
• The Topic-Based Syllabus
Another framework around which to organize language is that of different
topics.
• The Task-Based Syllabus
It list a series of task, and may later list some or all of the language to be used
in those task.
The Multi-syllabus syllabus
A common solution to the competing claims of the different syllabus types.
Instead of a program based exclusively on grammatical or lexical
categories, for example, the syllabus now shows any combination gof items
from grammar, lexis, language function, situation, topics, task, different
language skill task or pronunciation issue.
Making Plan
Exemplifies how a teacher proceed from pre-planning to a final plan.
• Pre-planning background
Some of the facts that feed into pre-planning decisions.
• Pre-planning decisions
as a result of the background information listed above the teacher
takes.
• The Plan
It should be emphasized that the following list are not examples of any
planning formal.

Syllabuses and Coursebook

  • 1.
    Syllabuses and Coursebook TedyNurmansyah Aulia Novi Hapsari Asty Asmarani Putri Anggita Nurhandayani Vevi Wulansari Gugum Gumilar
  • 2.
    Syllabuses Design Syllabus designconcerns the selection of items to be learnt and the grading of those items into an appropriate sequence. The designer is concerned not just with lists of what will be taught and in what order, but also with the planning, implementation, evaluation, management and administration of education programs. whatever type it is, every syllabus needs to be developed on the basis of certain criteria, such as ‘learnability’ and ‘frequency which can inform decisions about selection and ordering.
  • 3.
    Syllabus design criteria •Learnability • Frequency • Coverage • Usefulness
  • 4.
    Syllabus design criteria •Learnability Some structural or lexical items are easier for students to learn there others. Frequency It would make sense especially at beginning levels, include items which are more frequent in the language, than ones that are only used occasionally by native speakers.
  • 5.
    Syllabus design criteria •Coverage Some words and structures have greater coverage (scope for use) than others. • Usefulness The reason that words like book an pen figure so highly in classroom (even though the might not be that frequent in real language use)
  • 6.
    DIFFERENT SYLLABUSES • TheGrammar Syllabus • The Lexical Syllabus • The Functional Syllabus • The Situational Syllabus • The Topic-Based Syllabus • The Task-Based Syllabus
  • 7.
    DIFFERENT SYLLABUSES • TheGrammar Syllabus This is the commonest type of syllabus, both traditionally and currently. • The Lexical Syllabus It is possible to organize a syllabus on the basis of vocabulary and lexis to create a lexical syllabus. • The Functional Syllabus It was included categories of communicative function. These language function are events which do thing such as inviting, promoising and offering.
  • 8.
    DIFFERENT SYLLABUSES • TheSituational Syllabus It is offers the possibility of selecting and sequencing different real-life situations rather than different grammatical items, vocabulary topics. • The Topic-Based Syllabus Another framework around which to organize language is that of different topics. • The Task-Based Syllabus It list a series of task, and may later list some or all of the language to be used in those task.
  • 9.
    The Multi-syllabus syllabus Acommon solution to the competing claims of the different syllabus types. Instead of a program based exclusively on grammatical or lexical categories, for example, the syllabus now shows any combination gof items from grammar, lexis, language function, situation, topics, task, different language skill task or pronunciation issue.
  • 10.
    Making Plan Exemplifies howa teacher proceed from pre-planning to a final plan. • Pre-planning background Some of the facts that feed into pre-planning decisions. • Pre-planning decisions as a result of the background information listed above the teacher takes. • The Plan It should be emphasized that the following list are not examples of any planning formal.