The Framework of Materials and
Method
Introduction:
Setting the
Scene
English as a Global Language
• Graddol (2006) “the availability of English as a global language is
accelerating globalization. On the other hand, the globalization is
accelerating the use of English.
English language teaching has been diversified.
• English as a Foreign Language (EFL) – English is taught outside
English speaking regions.
• English as a Second Language (ESL) – English is taught inside
English speaking regions to non-native learners.
• English for Young Learners (EYL) – English is taught as an
additional language to very young to young learners up to,
normally, primary level.
• English for Specific Purposes (ESP) – English is taught for specific
occupational purposes such as English for medicine and for
business.
• English for Academic Purposes (EAP) – English is taught to those
who wish to study at institutes of higher education.
• Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) – English is
taught in cross-curricular programs in which content subjects and
language are taught at the same time.
The
Framework:
Context and
Syllabus
• Overall, the goals of a language teaching program
is usually derived from an analysis of the reasons
why a group of learners in a particular
environment needs to learn English. Goals need
to be realistic for each circumstance. They may be
set out by the government which is the national
language policy.
e.g. Philippines, Malaysia, Japan
• There is a whole spectrum of possibilities for
defining the goals of language teaching, for a
country, an age group, a whole school, a class or
an individual; and whether for general
educational purposes, business, scientific
development, cultural appreciation or many
other reasons.
The Framework of Language Teaching
Contextual
factors
Learners
• Age
• Interests
• Level of proficiency in English
• Aptitude
• Mother tongue
• Academic and educational level
• Attitudes to learning
• Attitudes to learning
• Motivation
• Reasons for learning
• Preferred learning styles
• Personality
Setting
• The role of English in the country
• The role of English in the school
• Teachers
• Management &
• Administration
• Resource availability
• Support personnel
• The number of pupils
• Time
• Physical environment
• Socio-cultural environment
• Types of tests used
• Procedures for monitoring & evaluating
The Syllabus
The next step in the task of planning is to
select a type of syllabus relevant to the
learners for whom it is intended,
appropriate to the situation and which
fulfills the aims as closely as possible.
The ‘syllabus’ can be seen for our purposes
as the overall organizing principle for what is
to be taught and learned. In other words, it
is a general statement as to the pedagogical
arrangement of learning content.
Syllabus
• Richards and Rodgers (2001) have proposed a useful
framework for the comparison of language teaching methods
that illustrates the place of the syllabus in program planning.
Three distinct levels
1. Approach - the most general level and refers to the views,
beliefs, and theories of language learning which planning is
based.
2. Design – a level where the principles of the first level are
converted into the more practical aspects of syllabuses and
instructional materials.
3. Procedure – refers to the techniques and the management
of the classroom itself.
Principles of
Syllabus
Organization
Six broad
types of
syllabus
1. grammatical or structural
2. functional-notional
3. situational
4. skills-based
5. topic-based
6. task-based
Grammatical
or Structural
syllabus
• consists of a list of grammatical items selected and graded in terms of
simplicity and complexity (Nunan, 1988).
• Exposes learners to various grammatical structures step by step and
they are supposed to master them by internalizing the rules.
• Emphasizes grammar as the most important the learning content.
• Uses grammar exercises to test the learners’ knowledge.
• Focuses on the learning outcome.
• Believes that grammar or the structure of language is most significant
part in language learning.
Functional-
Notional
Syllabus
• Based on the premise that communication is a meaningful behavior
in a social and cultural context that requires creative language use
rather than synthetic sentence building.
• Grammatical structures are taught not as an end in themselves but
as a means of carrying out communicative functions.
• Based on communicative competence theory
• Notion – a specific context of communication
• Function – a specific purpose in that context.
• Emphasis is primarily on the semantic and communicative aspects
along with grammatical and situational factors.
• Needs analysis is a prerequisite.
Functional-Notional
Syllabus
• It is a more inclusive notion based on
communicative competence theory as
proposed by Dell Hymes who felt that
the linguistic forms should be studied
along with the ways in which they are
used.
Functional-
Notional
Syllabus
Notion- is the specific context in which we
communicate.
Function – is a specific purpose in a
context.
Example
Shopping can be a notion
Asking price, bargaining, and discussing the
product can be the functions of language
Characteristics
of notional
functional
approaches:
1. A functional view of language focusing on doing something through
language;
2. A semantic base, as opposed to a grammatical or a situational base;
3. A learner-centered view of language learning;
4. A basis in the analysis of learner needs for using language that is
reflected in goals, content selection and sequencing, methodology, and
evaluation;
5. Learner-centered goals, objectives, and content organization
reflecting authentic language behavior and offering a spiraling
development of content;
6. Learning activities involving authentic language use; and
7. Testing focused on ability to use language to react to and operate on
the environment. (p. 18-19)
Situational
Syllabus
Meaning is dependent not only
on structure and linguistic
knowledge but also on the
context of the utterance.
Content based on everyday
situations. (making and
answering calls, buying, etc.)
Situational
Syllabus
Motivational level of the learners
is enhanced.
Limitation: Notions and functions
are limited to few situations.
Learner-centered rather than
subject-centered.
Three types
of situational
syllabus
differentiated
by their
informational
content and
linguistic
content.
1. Limbo: Specific setting of the situation is
of little or no importance. What is important
is the particular language focus involved.
2. Concrete: Situations are enacted to
specific settings and the language associated
with it.
3. Mythical: Situations depend on a fictional
cast of characters in a fictional place.
(Pp.179-180).
Skill-Based
Syllabus
Specific language skills are
taught to enhance confidence.
Specific language skills: Reading
Skills, Grammar Skills, Listening
Skills, Writing Skills
Topic-Based
Syllabus
• Built around certain topics and themes, such as: Travel,
drugs, religious Persuasion, advertising, modern
architecture, sport , etc.
• Usually starts with a variety of exercise that stimulates
student interest in the theme and develop the student’s
ability to manipulate the language appropriate to the
situation and use the language of the theme.
• The rest of the thematic unit include activities that
elaborate the theme, such as key ideas, including
cultural, cross-cultural and linguistic, listening
comprehension; speaking, reading, writing, and
vocabulary.
Task-Based Syllabus
• "Task" being "anything the learners are given to do (or choose to do) in the
language classroom to further the process of language learning.” (Williams &
Burden, 1997: p.167).
• Pedagogic task is the departure point.
• Task as an “activity in which: 1) meaning is primary; 2) there is some sort of
relationship to the real world; 3) task completion has some priority; and 4) the
assessment of task performance is in terms of task outcome. (Skehan, 1996 p.38).
Syllabus
• Most syllabuses are based on a combination of two or more of the syllabus types.
• The need to distinguish between syllabus itself and what we might call a ‘syllabus
inventory’. It is a list of the contents to be covered in the language program.
• A syllabus is the way in which that content is organized and broken down into a
set of teachable and learnable units, and will include consideration of pacing,
sequencing and grading of items, methods of presentation and practice, and so
on.
END
Source
McDonough, J., Shaw, C. &
Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and
Methods in ELT: A Teachers’ Guide
(3rd Ed.). West Sussex: Blackwell
Publishing.

The Framework of Materials and Methods.pptx

  • 1.
    The Framework ofMaterials and Method
  • 2.
    Introduction: Setting the Scene English asa Global Language • Graddol (2006) “the availability of English as a global language is accelerating globalization. On the other hand, the globalization is accelerating the use of English. English language teaching has been diversified. • English as a Foreign Language (EFL) – English is taught outside English speaking regions. • English as a Second Language (ESL) – English is taught inside English speaking regions to non-native learners. • English for Young Learners (EYL) – English is taught as an additional language to very young to young learners up to, normally, primary level. • English for Specific Purposes (ESP) – English is taught for specific occupational purposes such as English for medicine and for business. • English for Academic Purposes (EAP) – English is taught to those who wish to study at institutes of higher education. • Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) – English is taught in cross-curricular programs in which content subjects and language are taught at the same time.
  • 3.
    The Framework: Context and Syllabus • Overall,the goals of a language teaching program is usually derived from an analysis of the reasons why a group of learners in a particular environment needs to learn English. Goals need to be realistic for each circumstance. They may be set out by the government which is the national language policy. e.g. Philippines, Malaysia, Japan • There is a whole spectrum of possibilities for defining the goals of language teaching, for a country, an age group, a whole school, a class or an individual; and whether for general educational purposes, business, scientific development, cultural appreciation or many other reasons.
  • 4.
    The Framework ofLanguage Teaching
  • 5.
    Contextual factors Learners • Age • Interests •Level of proficiency in English • Aptitude • Mother tongue • Academic and educational level • Attitudes to learning • Attitudes to learning • Motivation • Reasons for learning • Preferred learning styles • Personality
  • 6.
    Setting • The roleof English in the country • The role of English in the school • Teachers • Management & • Administration • Resource availability • Support personnel • The number of pupils • Time • Physical environment • Socio-cultural environment • Types of tests used • Procedures for monitoring & evaluating
  • 7.
    The Syllabus The nextstep in the task of planning is to select a type of syllabus relevant to the learners for whom it is intended, appropriate to the situation and which fulfills the aims as closely as possible. The ‘syllabus’ can be seen for our purposes as the overall organizing principle for what is to be taught and learned. In other words, it is a general statement as to the pedagogical arrangement of learning content.
  • 8.
    Syllabus • Richards andRodgers (2001) have proposed a useful framework for the comparison of language teaching methods that illustrates the place of the syllabus in program planning. Three distinct levels 1. Approach - the most general level and refers to the views, beliefs, and theories of language learning which planning is based. 2. Design – a level where the principles of the first level are converted into the more practical aspects of syllabuses and instructional materials. 3. Procedure – refers to the techniques and the management of the classroom itself.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Six broad types of syllabus 1.grammatical or structural 2. functional-notional 3. situational 4. skills-based 5. topic-based 6. task-based
  • 11.
    Grammatical or Structural syllabus • consistsof a list of grammatical items selected and graded in terms of simplicity and complexity (Nunan, 1988). • Exposes learners to various grammatical structures step by step and they are supposed to master them by internalizing the rules. • Emphasizes grammar as the most important the learning content. • Uses grammar exercises to test the learners’ knowledge. • Focuses on the learning outcome. • Believes that grammar or the structure of language is most significant part in language learning.
  • 12.
    Functional- Notional Syllabus • Based onthe premise that communication is a meaningful behavior in a social and cultural context that requires creative language use rather than synthetic sentence building. • Grammatical structures are taught not as an end in themselves but as a means of carrying out communicative functions. • Based on communicative competence theory • Notion – a specific context of communication • Function – a specific purpose in that context. • Emphasis is primarily on the semantic and communicative aspects along with grammatical and situational factors. • Needs analysis is a prerequisite.
  • 13.
    Functional-Notional Syllabus • It isa more inclusive notion based on communicative competence theory as proposed by Dell Hymes who felt that the linguistic forms should be studied along with the ways in which they are used.
  • 14.
    Functional- Notional Syllabus Notion- is thespecific context in which we communicate. Function – is a specific purpose in a context. Example Shopping can be a notion Asking price, bargaining, and discussing the product can be the functions of language
  • 15.
    Characteristics of notional functional approaches: 1. Afunctional view of language focusing on doing something through language; 2. A semantic base, as opposed to a grammatical or a situational base; 3. A learner-centered view of language learning; 4. A basis in the analysis of learner needs for using language that is reflected in goals, content selection and sequencing, methodology, and evaluation; 5. Learner-centered goals, objectives, and content organization reflecting authentic language behavior and offering a spiraling development of content; 6. Learning activities involving authentic language use; and 7. Testing focused on ability to use language to react to and operate on the environment. (p. 18-19)
  • 16.
    Situational Syllabus Meaning is dependentnot only on structure and linguistic knowledge but also on the context of the utterance. Content based on everyday situations. (making and answering calls, buying, etc.)
  • 17.
    Situational Syllabus Motivational level ofthe learners is enhanced. Limitation: Notions and functions are limited to few situations. Learner-centered rather than subject-centered.
  • 18.
    Three types of situational syllabus differentiated bytheir informational content and linguistic content. 1. Limbo: Specific setting of the situation is of little or no importance. What is important is the particular language focus involved. 2. Concrete: Situations are enacted to specific settings and the language associated with it. 3. Mythical: Situations depend on a fictional cast of characters in a fictional place. (Pp.179-180).
  • 19.
    Skill-Based Syllabus Specific language skillsare taught to enhance confidence. Specific language skills: Reading Skills, Grammar Skills, Listening Skills, Writing Skills
  • 20.
    Topic-Based Syllabus • Built aroundcertain topics and themes, such as: Travel, drugs, religious Persuasion, advertising, modern architecture, sport , etc. • Usually starts with a variety of exercise that stimulates student interest in the theme and develop the student’s ability to manipulate the language appropriate to the situation and use the language of the theme. • The rest of the thematic unit include activities that elaborate the theme, such as key ideas, including cultural, cross-cultural and linguistic, listening comprehension; speaking, reading, writing, and vocabulary.
  • 21.
    Task-Based Syllabus • "Task"being "anything the learners are given to do (or choose to do) in the language classroom to further the process of language learning.” (Williams & Burden, 1997: p.167). • Pedagogic task is the departure point. • Task as an “activity in which: 1) meaning is primary; 2) there is some sort of relationship to the real world; 3) task completion has some priority; and 4) the assessment of task performance is in terms of task outcome. (Skehan, 1996 p.38).
  • 22.
    Syllabus • Most syllabusesare based on a combination of two or more of the syllabus types. • The need to distinguish between syllabus itself and what we might call a ‘syllabus inventory’. It is a list of the contents to be covered in the language program. • A syllabus is the way in which that content is organized and broken down into a set of teachable and learnable units, and will include consideration of pacing, sequencing and grading of items, methods of presentation and practice, and so on.
  • 23.
    END Source McDonough, J., Shaw,C. & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teachers’ Guide (3rd Ed.). West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing.