The document provides an update on the implementation and plans for the final year of the EU4ENVIRONMENT WATER AND DATA action. It discusses progress made on various outputs and indicators, and whether targets are achievable. For Output 1.1, 7% of river basins now have completed river basin management plans, short of the 50% target. Only one nature-based solution has been identified so far against a target of three. Upcoming tasks are outlined to work towards remaining targets. Similar updates are provided for other outputs related to water monitoring, strategies, and governance.
EU4Environment water and data regional launch eventOECD Environment
The document summarizes a regional launch event for a new European Union program on water resources and environmental data in Eastern Partnership countries. It includes an agenda for presentations and feedback on the program outline, goals to improve environmental resilience and extend environmental databases. Implementing partners will lead on specific outputs like river management plans, water monitoring, economic analysis, and improving availability of statistics on topics like water, land, and air quality. The program aims to engage stakeholders and improve open data and policy-relevant information to support decision-making. National kick-off events will take place in each country during an inception phase leading to validation and start of implementation activities.
The document summarizes a regional launch event for a new European Union program on water resources and environmental data in Eastern Partnership countries. It includes an agenda for presentations and feedback on the program outline, goals to improve environmental resilience and extend environmental databases. Implementing partners will lead on specific outputs like river management plans, water monitoring, economic analysis, and improving availability of statistics on topics like water, land, and air quality. The program aims to engage stakeholders and improve open data and policy-relevant information to support decision-making. National kick-off events will take place in each country during an inception phase leading to validation and start of implementation activities.
EU4Environment Water and Data_Azerbaijan NPD Thematic Session 1OECD Environment
The document discusses activities under the EU4Environment Water and Data programme to support Azerbaijan's sustainable water resource management. Key activities include:
1) Extending water monitoring networks and trainings to improve data collection, interpretation and compliance with EU directives.
2) Proposing river basin districts and supporting progress on river basin organization and planning.
3) Discussions on improving economic instruments to better support water policy objectives.
4) Promoting cross-sectoral cooperation and long-term planning to address water challenges.
The document discusses key challenges and the status of water reforms in Eastern Partnership countries based on regional trends and baseline indicators. It finds that while countries have made progress in adopting international agreements and developing river basin management plans, challenges remain in fully implementing policies on the ground. Areas identified for further capacity building include strengthening monitoring systems, improving economic regulation of water, and increasing cross-border cooperation on shared water resources. The EUWI+ initiative aims to help countries address these challenges and better align their water management practices with EU standards.
The document summarizes the European Union Water Initiative plus project for Eastern Partnership countries. Key achievements include supporting the development of national water strategies and economic instruments in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. It also supported laboratory development, monitoring networks, river basin management planning, stakeholder participation, and transboundary cooperation. Lessons learned include the importance of legal frameworks, national ownership, funding sustainability, and maintaining exchange between regions. The project will continue supporting water reforms and plans to extend beyond 2020.
Project Document: Stategic assements of ecological status of transboundary waters for GEF use.
Identification of more sustainable approaches to the use of water and its resources at national, regional and local levels.
The document summarizes the outcomes of the first steering committee meeting of the European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership held in Brussels on May 16, 2017. It outlines the key results and activities to be undertaken in Azerbaijan in 3 areas: 1) strengthening legislation, policy and institutions for water governance, 2) improving laboratory and monitoring programs, and 3) developing river basin management plans and increasing stakeholder involvement in water management.
This document summarizes a workshop on developing River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) for the Upper Kura river basin in Azerbaijan. The workshop objectives were to: inform participants on the principles and concepts of the EU Water Framework Directive; understand the assignments for developing RBMPs in the Upper Kura districts and main challenges; and facilitate contact between consultants and stakeholders. The workshop covered the national legal framework for RBMPs in Azerbaijan, lessons learned from previous RBMP pilot projects, and presentations from consultants on their proposed approaches to developing the new RBMPs.
EU4Environment water and data regional launch eventOECD Environment
The document summarizes a regional launch event for a new European Union program on water resources and environmental data in Eastern Partnership countries. It includes an agenda for presentations and feedback on the program outline, goals to improve environmental resilience and extend environmental databases. Implementing partners will lead on specific outputs like river management plans, water monitoring, economic analysis, and improving availability of statistics on topics like water, land, and air quality. The program aims to engage stakeholders and improve open data and policy-relevant information to support decision-making. National kick-off events will take place in each country during an inception phase leading to validation and start of implementation activities.
The document summarizes a regional launch event for a new European Union program on water resources and environmental data in Eastern Partnership countries. It includes an agenda for presentations and feedback on the program outline, goals to improve environmental resilience and extend environmental databases. Implementing partners will lead on specific outputs like river management plans, water monitoring, economic analysis, and improving availability of statistics on topics like water, land, and air quality. The program aims to engage stakeholders and improve open data and policy-relevant information to support decision-making. National kick-off events will take place in each country during an inception phase leading to validation and start of implementation activities.
EU4Environment Water and Data_Azerbaijan NPD Thematic Session 1OECD Environment
The document discusses activities under the EU4Environment Water and Data programme to support Azerbaijan's sustainable water resource management. Key activities include:
1) Extending water monitoring networks and trainings to improve data collection, interpretation and compliance with EU directives.
2) Proposing river basin districts and supporting progress on river basin organization and planning.
3) Discussions on improving economic instruments to better support water policy objectives.
4) Promoting cross-sectoral cooperation and long-term planning to address water challenges.
The document discusses key challenges and the status of water reforms in Eastern Partnership countries based on regional trends and baseline indicators. It finds that while countries have made progress in adopting international agreements and developing river basin management plans, challenges remain in fully implementing policies on the ground. Areas identified for further capacity building include strengthening monitoring systems, improving economic regulation of water, and increasing cross-border cooperation on shared water resources. The EUWI+ initiative aims to help countries address these challenges and better align their water management practices with EU standards.
The document summarizes the European Union Water Initiative plus project for Eastern Partnership countries. Key achievements include supporting the development of national water strategies and economic instruments in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. It also supported laboratory development, monitoring networks, river basin management planning, stakeholder participation, and transboundary cooperation. Lessons learned include the importance of legal frameworks, national ownership, funding sustainability, and maintaining exchange between regions. The project will continue supporting water reforms and plans to extend beyond 2020.
Project Document: Stategic assements of ecological status of transboundary waters for GEF use.
Identification of more sustainable approaches to the use of water and its resources at national, regional and local levels.
The document summarizes the outcomes of the first steering committee meeting of the European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership held in Brussels on May 16, 2017. It outlines the key results and activities to be undertaken in Azerbaijan in 3 areas: 1) strengthening legislation, policy and institutions for water governance, 2) improving laboratory and monitoring programs, and 3) developing river basin management plans and increasing stakeholder involvement in water management.
This document summarizes a workshop on developing River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) for the Upper Kura river basin in Azerbaijan. The workshop objectives were to: inform participants on the principles and concepts of the EU Water Framework Directive; understand the assignments for developing RBMPs in the Upper Kura districts and main challenges; and facilitate contact between consultants and stakeholders. The workshop covered the national legal framework for RBMPs in Azerbaijan, lessons learned from previous RBMP pilot projects, and presentations from consultants on their proposed approaches to developing the new RBMPs.
The document summarizes the activities and expected outcomes of the European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership. Key activities include supporting Georgia to develop a national water strategy, harmonizing environmental laws, strengthening water quality monitoring programs, developing river basin management plans for several basins, implementing measures from the plans, and increasing stakeholder involvement and communication about water management issues. The overall goal is to help Georgia further reform its water management system to align with EU directives and commitments under its Association Agreement with the EU.
The document summarizes the outcomes of the first steering committee meeting of the European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership held on May 16, 2017 in Brussels, Belgium. It outlines the key results and project outcomes in 3 areas: 1) strengthening legislation, policy and institutions related to water management, 2) improving laboratory and monitoring programs, and 3) increasing stakeholder involvement and communication. Specific outcomes include developing mid-term action plans for water and sanitation, supporting implementation of international agreements, upgrading monitoring networks, and establishing mechanisms for public participation in water resource management.
The European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership held its first Steering Committee meeting in Brussels, Belgium on May 16, 2017. The meeting summarized progress on 3 key results areas: 1) Supporting legislation, policy and institutions in Belarus related to water management; 2) Strengthening laboratory monitoring programs to be compliant with the EU Water Framework Directive; and 3) Involving stakeholders and improving communication about water management in Belarus. Key outcomes included launching a national water policy dialogue, developing a new water strategy, and procuring new equipment and training to improve water quality monitoring.
2014-2016 work programmes thematic programmes and the knowledge chain_john me...Global Water Partnership
The document outlines the agenda and objectives for the 2014-2016 GWP Regional Work Programmes. It discusses developing 3-year regional work programmes that will serve as the main reference for financial partners, the results framework, and regional and local fundraising. The document provides guidance on the content of the regional work programmes, including background, strategic goals, implementation plans, resources needed, and results frameworks. It also presents a preliminary overview of thematic areas to be addressed in the draft regional work programmes.
The public meeting presentation covered 3 topics: 1) an update on the Drinking Water and Watershed Protection (DWWP) program including 7 programs, 2) a review of the Water Budget Study covering 7 water regions, and 3) watershed management. The DWWP programs included public awareness, monitoring, planning, water use management, quality management, and adapting to climate change. The Water Budget Study used conceptual models and calculations to assess water resources and identify stressed areas. The goals were to improve understanding of water resources and address ensuring sufficient water.
The document summarizes a public information meeting held on October 10th, 2013 in Parksville, BC. It provides an overview of the Drinking Water and Watershed Protection (DWWP) program update, including 7 programs focused on public awareness, water monitoring, land use planning, water use management, water quality management, and adapting to climate change. It also summarizes the findings of a Water Budget Study that was conducted to improve understanding of regional water resources through identifying water stores, estimating water volumes, and characterizing water movement between stores. The study involved developing conceptual models of the region's watersheds and calculating water budgets to assess potential stress on water resources.
The document summarizes the activities and outcomes of the first steering committee meeting of the European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership held in Brussels on May 16, 2017. It outlines 3 results areas that were discussed: 1) Legislation, policy and institutional strengthening in Armenia, 2) Strengthening of laboratory and monitoring programs, and 3) Development of river basin management plans for the Sevan and Hrazdan basins in Armenia. Specific projects were identified under each result area along with the expected outcomes of those projects.
The Danube - Black Sea Strategic Partnership Program: Progress, Issues and Wa...Iwl Pcu
Jitendra Srivastava & Meeta Sehgal
Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Unit
Europe and Central Asia Region, World Bank
U.S.A.
Moldova, October 2006
The presentation provided updates on the Drinking Water and Watershed Protection (DWWP) program, which included 7 programs focused on public awareness, water monitoring, land use planning, water use management, water quality management, and adapting to climate change. It also reviewed the findings of a Water Budget Study conducted across 7 water regions within the Regional District, which aimed to improve understanding of water resources by identifying water stores, estimating water volumes, and characterizing water movement and identifying stressed systems. The study involved data collection, developing conceptual models, calculating water budgets, and assessing stress levels on water systems.
The public information meeting presented updates on the Drinking Water and Watershed Protection (DWWP) program, including 7 key programs focused on public awareness, water monitoring, land use planning, water use management, water quality management, and adapting to climate change. It also reviewed the findings of a water budget study for Gabriola Island and surrounding areas. The water budget study developed conceptual models of the watersheds using available data and GIS layers to understand water movement and identify water stores experiencing stress.
This document summarizes a workshop on developing participatory River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) in Georgia and Azerbaijan. The workshop objectives were to:
1) Inform participants on the objectives and principles of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the main challenges of developing RBMPs for the Alazani and Upper Kura river basins.
2) Ensure best coordination between ongoing contracts to develop the RBMPs.
3) Facilitate contact between consultants and stakeholders.
The workshop involved presentations on the WFD, experiences from pilot RBMP development, and visions from Georgian and Azerbaijani contractors on implementing RBMPs, including stakeholder engagement.
This document discusses national adaptation plans (NAPs) and GWP's role in supporting their development. It provides an overview of:
1) The establishment of the NAP process under the UNFCCC to help countries develop strategies to address medium and long-term climate adaptation needs.
2) How GWP works to integrate water security, climate resilience, and economic development through its programs like WACDEP, which supports national implementation of adaptation.
3) Guidance developed by the LEG to help countries with the NAP process, including technical guidelines, sectoral supplements, and programs like the NAP-GSP that provide resources and expertise.
“Agenda Item 3. Key Milestones 2018” by EUWI+ team
EU Water Initiative plus for Eastern Partnership (EUWI+East)
Project Progress Meeting
Minsk, Belarus, 26 April 2018
This document outlines the strategic results framework for a project focused on groundwater management in the Syr Darya transboundary basin shared by Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Kazakhstan. The project goal is to create an enabling environment for sustainable and climate-resilient conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources in the basin. The framework includes 3 components, outcomes, indicators, and outputs. Component 1 focuses on enhancing knowledge and assessment capacity of groundwater resources. Component 2 aims to assess benefits from uses of subsurface space such as managed aquifer recharge. Component 3 provides tools for integrated management of surface and groundwater resources and facilitating transboundary cooperation.
Item 1.2 - Upgrading the water monitoring capacities for SW and GW bodiesOECD Environment
1. The EUWI+ program is upgrading water monitoring capacities in Moldova by procuring laboratory equipment, providing trainings, and developing monitoring plans.
2. Key achievements include completing the procurement of laboratory equipment, submitting documents for laboratory accreditation, and progressing surface water and groundwater monitoring plans.
3. Future work includes finalizing groundwater well drilling, developing monitoring guidance documents, and continuing trainings to build long-term monitoring capacities.
The document summarizes the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation National Target Programme II Joint Annual Review from 2007. Some key points:
- The RWSS NTP II aims to increase access to clean water and sanitation in rural Vietnam from 2006-2010.
- A Joint Annual Review meeting was held in October 2007 to assess progress and make recommendations.
- 12 recommendations were made, including strengthening capacity building, institutional frameworks, decentralization, budget allocation, and monitoring of benchmarks and triggers.
- Potential pilot activities in sanitation marketing, IEC materials, private management of water schemes, and a national hand washing campaign were identified.
The document discusses the EU4Environment Water and Data program which aims to support Azerbaijan in improving environmental data related to policy development. Key areas of focus include strengthening water monitoring, supporting land cover analysis using satellite imagery, and improving the availability of air quality and waste management data. It also discusses the potential for Azerbaijan to join cooperation with the European Environment Agency. Next steps proposed include assessing reporting capabilities, improving data access through an environmental portal, and ensuring quality of monitoring and reported data. Open policy questions are raised regarding inter-ministerial cooperation on statistics and data access.
The document summarizes progress in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Belarus on various water management initiatives supported by the EUWI+ program. In Armenia, key accomplishments include developing two river basin management plans, upgrading water monitoring infrastructure, and establishing an integrated water data management platform. Azerbaijan's achievements involve adopting a national water strategy, upgrading laboratories, and developing a river basin management plan. Belarus convened inter-agency meetings on water issues and worked to align legislation with EU directives.
The UNEP/MAP-GEF MedPartnership project aims to continue efforts to reduce pollution in the Mediterranean Sea and protect biodiversity through implementing strategic action programs. It involves 12 countries working with UNEP/MAP and the World Bank over multiple components including regional projects, investment funds, and demonstration projects. The project seeks to advance policy and legal reforms, fill knowledge gaps, and help implement integrated coastal zone management plans. Initial results include workshops training over 200 practitioners and reductions in water use and pollution loads at demonstration sites.
OECD Green Talks LIVE | Diving deeper: the evolving landscape for assessing w...OECD Environment
Water is critical for meeting commitments of the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Our economies rely on water, with recent estimates putting the economic value of water and freshwater ecosystems at USD 58 trillion - equivalent to 60% of global GDP. At the same time, water related risks are increasing in frequency and scale in the context of climate change.
How are investments shaping our economies and societies exposure to water risk? What role can the financial system play in supporting water security? And how can increased understanding of how finance both impacts and depends on water resources spur action towards greater water security?
This OECD Green Talks LIVE on Tuesday 14 May 2024 from 15:00 to 16:00 CEST discussed the evolving landscape for assessing water risks to the financial system.
OECD Policy Analyst Lylah Davies presented key findings and recommendations from recent OECD work on assessing the financial materiality of water-related risks, including the recently published paper “Watered down? Investigating the financial materiality of water-related risks” and was joined by experts to discuss relevant initiatives underway.
Detlef Van Vuuren- Integrated modelling for interrelated crises.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
More Related Content
Similar to EU4Environment Water and Data - Implementing Partners' presentation atSecond Regional Action Group Meeting
The document summarizes the activities and expected outcomes of the European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership. Key activities include supporting Georgia to develop a national water strategy, harmonizing environmental laws, strengthening water quality monitoring programs, developing river basin management plans for several basins, implementing measures from the plans, and increasing stakeholder involvement and communication about water management issues. The overall goal is to help Georgia further reform its water management system to align with EU directives and commitments under its Association Agreement with the EU.
The document summarizes the outcomes of the first steering committee meeting of the European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership held on May 16, 2017 in Brussels, Belgium. It outlines the key results and project outcomes in 3 areas: 1) strengthening legislation, policy and institutions related to water management, 2) improving laboratory and monitoring programs, and 3) increasing stakeholder involvement and communication. Specific outcomes include developing mid-term action plans for water and sanitation, supporting implementation of international agreements, upgrading monitoring networks, and establishing mechanisms for public participation in water resource management.
The European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership held its first Steering Committee meeting in Brussels, Belgium on May 16, 2017. The meeting summarized progress on 3 key results areas: 1) Supporting legislation, policy and institutions in Belarus related to water management; 2) Strengthening laboratory monitoring programs to be compliant with the EU Water Framework Directive; and 3) Involving stakeholders and improving communication about water management in Belarus. Key outcomes included launching a national water policy dialogue, developing a new water strategy, and procuring new equipment and training to improve water quality monitoring.
2014-2016 work programmes thematic programmes and the knowledge chain_john me...Global Water Partnership
The document outlines the agenda and objectives for the 2014-2016 GWP Regional Work Programmes. It discusses developing 3-year regional work programmes that will serve as the main reference for financial partners, the results framework, and regional and local fundraising. The document provides guidance on the content of the regional work programmes, including background, strategic goals, implementation plans, resources needed, and results frameworks. It also presents a preliminary overview of thematic areas to be addressed in the draft regional work programmes.
The public meeting presentation covered 3 topics: 1) an update on the Drinking Water and Watershed Protection (DWWP) program including 7 programs, 2) a review of the Water Budget Study covering 7 water regions, and 3) watershed management. The DWWP programs included public awareness, monitoring, planning, water use management, quality management, and adapting to climate change. The Water Budget Study used conceptual models and calculations to assess water resources and identify stressed areas. The goals were to improve understanding of water resources and address ensuring sufficient water.
The document summarizes a public information meeting held on October 10th, 2013 in Parksville, BC. It provides an overview of the Drinking Water and Watershed Protection (DWWP) program update, including 7 programs focused on public awareness, water monitoring, land use planning, water use management, water quality management, and adapting to climate change. It also summarizes the findings of a Water Budget Study that was conducted to improve understanding of regional water resources through identifying water stores, estimating water volumes, and characterizing water movement between stores. The study involved developing conceptual models of the region's watersheds and calculating water budgets to assess potential stress on water resources.
The document summarizes the activities and outcomes of the first steering committee meeting of the European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership held in Brussels on May 16, 2017. It outlines 3 results areas that were discussed: 1) Legislation, policy and institutional strengthening in Armenia, 2) Strengthening of laboratory and monitoring programs, and 3) Development of river basin management plans for the Sevan and Hrazdan basins in Armenia. Specific projects were identified under each result area along with the expected outcomes of those projects.
The Danube - Black Sea Strategic Partnership Program: Progress, Issues and Wa...Iwl Pcu
Jitendra Srivastava & Meeta Sehgal
Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Unit
Europe and Central Asia Region, World Bank
U.S.A.
Moldova, October 2006
The presentation provided updates on the Drinking Water and Watershed Protection (DWWP) program, which included 7 programs focused on public awareness, water monitoring, land use planning, water use management, water quality management, and adapting to climate change. It also reviewed the findings of a Water Budget Study conducted across 7 water regions within the Regional District, which aimed to improve understanding of water resources by identifying water stores, estimating water volumes, and characterizing water movement and identifying stressed systems. The study involved data collection, developing conceptual models, calculating water budgets, and assessing stress levels on water systems.
The public information meeting presented updates on the Drinking Water and Watershed Protection (DWWP) program, including 7 key programs focused on public awareness, water monitoring, land use planning, water use management, water quality management, and adapting to climate change. It also reviewed the findings of a water budget study for Gabriola Island and surrounding areas. The water budget study developed conceptual models of the watersheds using available data and GIS layers to understand water movement and identify water stores experiencing stress.
This document summarizes a workshop on developing participatory River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) in Georgia and Azerbaijan. The workshop objectives were to:
1) Inform participants on the objectives and principles of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the main challenges of developing RBMPs for the Alazani and Upper Kura river basins.
2) Ensure best coordination between ongoing contracts to develop the RBMPs.
3) Facilitate contact between consultants and stakeholders.
The workshop involved presentations on the WFD, experiences from pilot RBMP development, and visions from Georgian and Azerbaijani contractors on implementing RBMPs, including stakeholder engagement.
This document discusses national adaptation plans (NAPs) and GWP's role in supporting their development. It provides an overview of:
1) The establishment of the NAP process under the UNFCCC to help countries develop strategies to address medium and long-term climate adaptation needs.
2) How GWP works to integrate water security, climate resilience, and economic development through its programs like WACDEP, which supports national implementation of adaptation.
3) Guidance developed by the LEG to help countries with the NAP process, including technical guidelines, sectoral supplements, and programs like the NAP-GSP that provide resources and expertise.
“Agenda Item 3. Key Milestones 2018” by EUWI+ team
EU Water Initiative plus for Eastern Partnership (EUWI+East)
Project Progress Meeting
Minsk, Belarus, 26 April 2018
This document outlines the strategic results framework for a project focused on groundwater management in the Syr Darya transboundary basin shared by Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Kazakhstan. The project goal is to create an enabling environment for sustainable and climate-resilient conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources in the basin. The framework includes 3 components, outcomes, indicators, and outputs. Component 1 focuses on enhancing knowledge and assessment capacity of groundwater resources. Component 2 aims to assess benefits from uses of subsurface space such as managed aquifer recharge. Component 3 provides tools for integrated management of surface and groundwater resources and facilitating transboundary cooperation.
Item 1.2 - Upgrading the water monitoring capacities for SW and GW bodiesOECD Environment
1. The EUWI+ program is upgrading water monitoring capacities in Moldova by procuring laboratory equipment, providing trainings, and developing monitoring plans.
2. Key achievements include completing the procurement of laboratory equipment, submitting documents for laboratory accreditation, and progressing surface water and groundwater monitoring plans.
3. Future work includes finalizing groundwater well drilling, developing monitoring guidance documents, and continuing trainings to build long-term monitoring capacities.
The document summarizes the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation National Target Programme II Joint Annual Review from 2007. Some key points:
- The RWSS NTP II aims to increase access to clean water and sanitation in rural Vietnam from 2006-2010.
- A Joint Annual Review meeting was held in October 2007 to assess progress and make recommendations.
- 12 recommendations were made, including strengthening capacity building, institutional frameworks, decentralization, budget allocation, and monitoring of benchmarks and triggers.
- Potential pilot activities in sanitation marketing, IEC materials, private management of water schemes, and a national hand washing campaign were identified.
The document discusses the EU4Environment Water and Data program which aims to support Azerbaijan in improving environmental data related to policy development. Key areas of focus include strengthening water monitoring, supporting land cover analysis using satellite imagery, and improving the availability of air quality and waste management data. It also discusses the potential for Azerbaijan to join cooperation with the European Environment Agency. Next steps proposed include assessing reporting capabilities, improving data access through an environmental portal, and ensuring quality of monitoring and reported data. Open policy questions are raised regarding inter-ministerial cooperation on statistics and data access.
The document summarizes progress in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Belarus on various water management initiatives supported by the EUWI+ program. In Armenia, key accomplishments include developing two river basin management plans, upgrading water monitoring infrastructure, and establishing an integrated water data management platform. Azerbaijan's achievements involve adopting a national water strategy, upgrading laboratories, and developing a river basin management plan. Belarus convened inter-agency meetings on water issues and worked to align legislation with EU directives.
The UNEP/MAP-GEF MedPartnership project aims to continue efforts to reduce pollution in the Mediterranean Sea and protect biodiversity through implementing strategic action programs. It involves 12 countries working with UNEP/MAP and the World Bank over multiple components including regional projects, investment funds, and demonstration projects. The project seeks to advance policy and legal reforms, fill knowledge gaps, and help implement integrated coastal zone management plans. Initial results include workshops training over 200 practitioners and reductions in water use and pollution loads at demonstration sites.
Similar to EU4Environment Water and Data - Implementing Partners' presentation atSecond Regional Action Group Meeting (20)
OECD Green Talks LIVE | Diving deeper: the evolving landscape for assessing w...OECD Environment
Water is critical for meeting commitments of the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Our economies rely on water, with recent estimates putting the economic value of water and freshwater ecosystems at USD 58 trillion - equivalent to 60% of global GDP. At the same time, water related risks are increasing in frequency and scale in the context of climate change.
How are investments shaping our economies and societies exposure to water risk? What role can the financial system play in supporting water security? And how can increased understanding of how finance both impacts and depends on water resources spur action towards greater water security?
This OECD Green Talks LIVE on Tuesday 14 May 2024 from 15:00 to 16:00 CEST discussed the evolving landscape for assessing water risks to the financial system.
OECD Policy Analyst Lylah Davies presented key findings and recommendations from recent OECD work on assessing the financial materiality of water-related risks, including the recently published paper “Watered down? Investigating the financial materiality of water-related risks” and was joined by experts to discuss relevant initiatives underway.
Detlef Van Vuuren- Integrated modelling for interrelated crises.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Thomas Hertel- Integrated Policies for the Triple Planetary Crisis.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Jon Sampedro - Assessing synergies and trade offs for health and sustainable ...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Astrid Bos - Identifying trade offs & searching for synergies.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Ruth Delzeit - Modelling environmental and socio-economic impacts of cropland...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Wilfried Winiwarter - Implementing nitrogen pollution control pathways in the...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Laurent Drouet - Physical and Economic Risks of Climate Change.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
HyeJin Kim and Simon Smart - The biodiversity nexus across multiple drivers: ...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Case Study: Peptides-based Plant Protection Product (harpin proteins*) by Ros...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
CLE Contribution on the Assessment of Innovative Biochemicals in the EU Statu...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Additional Considerations for Pesticide Formulations Containing Microbial Pes...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Role of genome sequencing (WGS) in microbial biopesticides safety assessment ...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Considerations for Problem Formulation for Human Health Safety Assessments of...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
How to Identify and Quantify Mixtures What is Essential to Know for Risk Asse...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
APVMA outcome-focussed approach to data requirements to support registration ...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
The U.S. Perspective on Problem Formulation for Biopesticides: Shannon BORGESOECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Problem formulation for environmental risk assessment – Finnish case study: ...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Epcon is One of the World's leading Manufacturing Companies.EpconLP
Epcon is One of the World's leading Manufacturing Companies. With over 4000 installations worldwide, EPCON has been pioneering new techniques since 1977 that have become industry standards now. Founded in 1977, Epcon has grown from a one-man operation to a global leader in developing and manufacturing innovative air pollution control technology and industrial heating equipment.
Microbial characterisation and identification, and potability of River Kuywa ...Open Access Research Paper
Water contamination is one of the major causes of water borne diseases worldwide. In Kenya, approximately 43% of people lack access to potable water due to human contamination. River Kuywa water is currently experiencing contamination due to human activities. Its water is widely used for domestic, agricultural, industrial and recreational purposes. This study aimed at characterizing bacteria and fungi in river Kuywa water. Water samples were randomly collected from four sites of the river: site A (Matisi), site B (Ngwelo), site C (Nzoia water pump) and site D (Chalicha), during the dry season (January-March 2018) and wet season (April-July 2018) and were transported to Maseno University Microbiology and plant pathology laboratory for analysis. The characterization and identification of bacteria and fungi were carried out using standard microbiological techniques. Nine bacterial genera and three fungi were identified from Kuywa river water. Clostridium spp., Staphylococcus spp., Enterobacter spp., Streptococcus spp., E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Shigella spp., Proteus spp. and Salmonella spp. Fungi were Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus flavus complex and Penicillium species. Wet season recorded highest bacterial and fungal counts (6.61-7.66 and 3.83-6.75cfu/ml) respectively. The results indicated that the river Kuywa water is polluted and therefore unsafe for human consumption before treatment. It is therefore recommended that the communities to ensure that they boil water especially for drinking.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Climate Change All over the World .pptxsairaanwer024
Climate change refers to significant and lasting changes in the average weather patterns over periods ranging from decades to millions of years. It encompasses both global warming driven by human emissions of greenhouse gases and the resulting large-scale shifts in weather patterns. While climate change is a natural phenomenon, human activities, particularly since the Industrial Revolution, have accelerated its pace and intensity
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Presented by The Global Peatlands Assessment: Mapping, Policy, and Action at GLF Peatlands 2024 - The Global Peatlands Assessment: Mapping, Policy, and Action
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
Peatland Management in Indonesia, Science to Policy and Knowledge Education
EU4Environment Water and Data - Implementing Partners' presentation atSecond Regional Action Group Meeting
1. EU4ENVIRONMENT WATER AND DATA:
Update on implementation and plans for the final year
Second Regional Action Group Meeting
28 June 2023
2. OUTPUT 1.1 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
2
Output 1.1 The first cycle of river basin management planning in line
with the EU Water Framework Directive is extended
Indicator 1. Share of river basins for which the first cycle of river basins planning
in line with the Water Framework Directive was fully completed and
respective plans officially adopted by all relevant authorities
2. No. of identified feasible and cost-effective Nature Based Solutions
to achieve good qualitative and quantitative status of water bodies
Baseline 1. 6% (of the total area)
2. 0
Target (2024) 1. 50%
2. 3
Progress 1. 7% (adoption of AM-Sevan and Hrazdan RBMPs)
2. 1 (concept note for AZ-Kura Delta transmitted to EU-Delegation)
Target
achievable?
Partners are struggling with the adoption process. By 2024, 50% of the
area will be covered by RBMPs but potentially not all will be officially
adopted.
In addition, UA is producing all its RBMPs through various channels.
4. OUTPUT 1.1 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS
Targets:
• 50% of Eastern Partner Countries covered by adopted RBMPs if all RBMPs from
EUWI+ and EU4Environment programmes are adopted
• 3 Nature based Solutions initiated: 1) AZ Bring back Nature in Kura Delta; 2)
MD Sanitation by constructed wetland; 3) To be identified from a Programme
of Measures
Follow-up tasks:
• First RBMPs chapters on-going for AM-Northern basins, GE-Enguri and Rioni
basins, UA-Dnipro basin; complete draft by the end of 2023; consultations
during the first-half of 2024; final draft for mid-2024
• Finalisation of the delineation of River Basin Districts in AZ
• Transboundary harmonisation of RBMPs (Kura river basin in Caucasus
countries)
• Regional workshop on Nature based Solutions on-line on 6 July 2023 morning
4
5. OUTPUT 1.2 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 1.2 Water strategies, policies and practices include climate-
proofing measures
Indicator No. of relevant policy and planning documents that underwent climate
proofing, with a focus on water allocation
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 1
Progress 1 Quantitative Management Plan on-going (AM Qasakh pilot basin)
Target
achievable?
Yes
6. OUTPUT 1.2 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS
Targets:
• Production of a pilot Quantitative Management Plan for Qasakh sub-basin
• Available results of the pilot Quantitative Management Plan projectable
through guidance document and regional workshop to other countries
Follow-up tasks:
• First chapters are coming, complete draft available at the end of 2023,
parallel consultation
• Regional Workshop and guidance document during the coming reporting
period
• New Quantitative Management Plan to be initiated in MD. Ialpug sub-basin
selected in MD side. UA to be consulted as it is a transboundary sub-basin
feeding Yalpug lake in Danube delta.
6
7. OUTPUT 1.3 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 1.3 The implementation of water for health agenda advances
Indicator No. of additional policies developed with support from the action
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 3
Progress 1 (UA: An annex on water & health targets in the new Water Strategy)
AM: Drinking Water Directive roadmap under development
UA: report under the Protocol on Water and Health produced
Target
achievable?
Yes
8. OUTPUT 1.3 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS
Coordination and support
Link to work under 1.1 (RBMP), 1.4 (wastewater re-use), 1.5 (economic instruments) and
1.8 (investments)
Draw linkages to POMs and WSS interventions
Challenges: coordination between agencies
Follow-up tasks, next steps
AM, GE: support for accession to the Protocol on Water and Health
AZ, MD: revision of PWH targets to include COVID-19 considerations
AZ: share International experience on treatment and re-use of wastewater
GE: application of PWH scorecard on equitable access to water and sanitation
8
9. OUTPUT 1.4 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 1.4 Novel approaches to water monitoring are further promoted
Indicator 1. COVID monitoring in wastewater introduced by at least 4 partner countries
2. No. of previously introduced novel approaches regularly applied by at least 4
partner countries
Baseline 1. 0
2. 0
Target (2024) 1. 5
2. 4
Progress 1. Support on WW PCR analysis provided, further trainings on sequencing and
statistics under prep. Guidance on establishing a regulatory agreement provided.
2. SW surveys implemented in AM, AZ, GE, MD. GW surveys done in AM, GE,
MD. SW & GW transboundary surveys in AM-GE, AZ-GE under preparation.
SW + GW trainings in progress. Investigative monitoring done in AM.
Lab: Profic. Test participation for nutrients and heavy metals (AM, AZ, GE,
MD), PAH (MD, GE) and pesticides (AZ, MD), regional lab training on PAH
conducted.
CTW: 2 surveys implemented in GE and 2 in AZ.
NVZ (UA): Proposal for determining provisional Nitrate-vulnerable Zones
Target
achievable?
1. Yes
2. Yes (SW, GW, CTW and Lab), except for field surveys in UA
10. OUTPUT 1.4 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS COVID
• High awareness for wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) in all countries
• First trainings on analysing wastewater allowed identifying gaps: need to reduce them
Coordination and support/inputs required
• New trainings on data management & statistics and variant analyses - answers on
new questionnaire to identify relevant health and data management partners.
• GE and UA: needed coordination with US CDC and PATH (possible overlap -> synergies)
• Coordination with UNECE on Protocol on Water & Health
Targets at risk
• Continuous data production is not in place yet (except UA)
• WBE needs formalized set-up in all countries -> regular and sustainable surveillance
Follow-up tasks
• 3 July: high-level regional Workshop with COM to stimulate set-up of natl. surveillance
• Further specific trainings, as planned
10
11. OUTPUT 1.4 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS MONITORING
Coordination and support/inputs
• With UNECE for transboundary surveys
Targets at risk
• GW: AZ pending feedback on in-kind contribution for survey 2023.
• SW: MD had no survey in 2022. One planned for 2023 but EAM budget is not secured.
AZ got 2 new biologists in need of training. Training plans will be achieved in all countries but
sustainability depends on formalization, ownership. Investigative monitoring in GE, MD?
• CTW: GE in need of training on application of intercalibrated IBI Black Sea index for Phytoplankton.
AZ ecological status assessment is based on only one BQE (Phytoplankton).
Follow-up tasks
• GW status assessment trainings already planned in MD, needs to be planned for AZ.
• SW trainings on MZB, PHB & data interpretat. Surveys in MD, AM. Transb. surveys in AM-GE, AZ-GE
• CTW: GE phytoplankton training in RO (basically agreed with host
institution). AZ: introduction of additional biological quality elements (BQE)
11
12. OUTPUT 1.4 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – LABORATORY
Coordination and support/inputs
• Required consumables according to the provided checklists need to be purchased by
beneficiary laboratories in order to ensure successful lab trainings and to comply with
WFD monitoring of priority substances
Targets at risk
• GC-MS/MS equipment is currently not used/shut down in AZ, GE, MD and UA
• Some consumables are not yet available at lab premises in AZ, GE and MD: risk for
regional lab trainings
• Personnel and budget issues in MD need to be solved
Follow-up tasks
• Continuation of proficiency test (essential for accreditation) of natural and synthetic
water samples on nutrients, heavy metals, PAH and pesticides.
• Regional lab trainings on PAH and organochlorine pesticides (August 2023/host: GE),
alkylphenols and VOCs (October 2023/host: AZ), phthalates and N,P-pesticides (Jan/Feb
2024/host: Moldova (TBC))
12
13. OUTPUT 1.5 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 1.5 The economic soundness of water strategies and policies
is improved
Indicator No. of counter-productive water subsidy schemes identified and
roadmaps for reform developed
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 3
Progress On track. We see opportunities for 5 roadmaps, this will become clear
in the next phase of implementation.
Target
achievable?
Yes
14. OUTPUT 1.5 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS
Coordination and support/inputs required from Partners:
• Ad-hoc review of reports and studies as they become available, e.g:
• Review of technical and economic performance of Water User Associations in Armenia
• Reforming water abstraction and environmental (pollution) fees in Armenia
• Prerequisites for reforming water pricing systems in agriculture in Azerbaijan
• implementation guidance for reforming surface water abstraction in Georgia
• Methodology for reforming the water tax in Moldova
• Methodological recommendations for the revitalisation of watercourses and freshwater
ecosystems in Ukraine
• We plan to present and discuss deliverables under 1.5 during the next round of NPDs
Targets at risk
• None
Follow-up tasks, next steps:
• In the process of launching work in Georgia and Moldova
• Armenia, Azerbaijan and Ukraine are advanced
• Request from Ukraine to link to strategy implementation – OECD to develop a concept
for sharing with partners
14
15. OUTPUT 1.6 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 1.6 Water utilities, private sector and the general public are
better involved in water management
Indicator No. of well-functioning water basin councils that held public
consultations at least twice during planning process
Baseline 10
Target (2024) 13
Progress So far, 2 Basin Councils in MD, 13 in UA
Target
achievable?
7 planning process during EU4WD (1 in UA involving 4 Basin Councils)
16. OUTPUT 1.6 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS
Targets:
• Contribution of consultations to the finalisation of RBMPs through
stakeholders' involvement
• Emergence of Basin Councils in Caucasus
Follow-up tasks:
• Proposal of criteria of well-functioning Basin Councils
• RBMPs consultations in association with Basin Councils and relevant bodies
(link with Output 1.1)
• Students' event (Fall 2023, link with EU4Energy)
16
17. OUTPUT 1.7 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 1.7 The national and international water governance and
cooperation are further strengthened
Indicator No. of transboudary arrangements and IWRM-related policies that are
advanced by the action
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 3
Progress 2
AM: amendments to the Water Code adopted
UA: new Water Strategy adopted
Target
achievable?
Yes
18. OUTPUT 1.7 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS
Coordination and support
NPD meetings organisations are shared with OECD
Contribution by all partners on policy discussions @NPDs and international meetings, including UNECE
meetings (Water Convention and Protocol on Water and Health)
Challenges:
Proposed new logframe indicator: supported number of participants of international meetings
Follow-up tasks, next steps
Discussion on the next round of NPDs
3rd reporting under SDG indicator 6.5.2 on transboundary water cooperation by 30 June 2023
Regional workshop on monitoring & assessment in transboundary basins: 16-18 October 2023, Geneva,
Switzerland
Global workshop on funding and financing transboundary water cooperation (5 - 6 December 2023)
and Water-Food-Energy-Ecosystems Nexus Task Force meeting (7 - 8 December 2023), Geneva,
Switzerland
Transboundary monitoring agreements AM-GE (Khrami-Debed) and AZ-GE (Alazani)
Idea of AM-AZ transboundary cooperation
The Prut agreement (MD, UA, RO)
Support to the WGs of the Dniester Commission
18
19. OUTPUT 1.8 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 1.8 Priority measures are supported through finance
mobilisation
Indicator No. of roadmaps to address barriers to EaP water sector financing
developed
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 1
Progress On track
Target
achievable?
Yes
20. OUTPUT 1.8 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS
Coordination and support/inputs required
• Ad-hoc review of deliverables as they become available
• particularly in the context of finance for RBMP PoM implementation and regional
assessment on the enabling environment for water finance
• Participation in workshops
• OECD engagement in RBMP development and POM scoping
Targets at risk
• None
Follow-up tasks, next steps:
• Enabling environment work ongoing – Armenia pilot
• NPD in Armenia an opportunity for all to participate in back-to-back workshop
• Parallel work to be launched on sources of finance and innovative solutions
20
21. OUTPUT 2.1 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.1 Water accounts are extended
Indicator 1. No. of country-specific progress reviews concerning water
accounting use
2. No. of countries with improved water accounting (note: „additional“
had originally referred to Belarus)
Baseline 1. 0
2. 0
Target (2024) 1. 4
2. 2
Progress 1. Review completed, documentation on-going
2. Knowledge on water accounting is improved
Target
achievable?
Yes
23. OUTPUT 2.2 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.2 Land and agriculture monitoring and data are improved
Indicator 1. No. of additional CORINE land cover pilots supported
2. No. of countries with pilot use of high-resolution Copernicus data
layers
Baseline 1. 5 Pilot projects done in SEIS II, extension of CLC proposed and
accepted
2. 0
Target (2024) 1. 4 In total around 80,000 km2 are mapped without further financing
(CLC)
2. 3
Progress 1. 4 CLC Mappings are on-going, finalisation for March 2024 foreseen
2. 4 HRL use cases in preparation for autumn +winter
Target
achievable?
Yes
24. CLC FOR REPUBLIC OF UKRAINE FOR THE CARPATHIAN REGION
(27.000KM)
24
http://seis.menr.gov.ua/clc/
• CLC Implementation by REEFMC and
Agroresurssystem supported by Lechner
• assistance is provided by verification and
comparison with Neighbourhood areas (for
consistency)
• Provision of Interchange software package
• Realisation till March2024
25. 25
HIGH RESOLUTION VEGETATION PHENOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY
The workshop in autumn 2023 will
• introduce the Copernicus land monitoring
component (CLMS)
• detailed overview of available datasets
• Training on how to find and access the
respective datasets through different
data portals.
Case studies will be done
1) To investigate shrinking of lakes due to
low rainfalls and high temperatures,
2) to identify deforestation and establish
links to illegal logging activities, and
3) to analyze inter-annual changes in
vegetation cover and productivity.
HR-VPP coverage in Moldova
HR-VPP in Europe
The workshop in autumn 2023 will
• introduce the Copernicus land monitoring
component (CLMS)
• detailed overview of available datasets
• Training on how to find and access the
respective datasets through different
data portals.
Case studies will be done
1) To investigate shrinking of lakes due to
low rainfalls and high temperatures,
2) to identify deforestation and establish
links to illegal logging activities, and
3) to analyze inter-annual changes in
vegetation cover and productivity.
26. OUTPUT 2.3 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.3 Air and waste management data and statistics are
improved for policy-relevant use
Indicator 1. No. of countries that improved air pollutant inventories with EU
support
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 3
Progress UA (until 2023 APENA supports; in the 2024 inventory, the war
effects need to be calculated),
AM & GE participated in the European centralized review,
GE to add gridded data, AM needs national methodology to improve
calculation of industry/traffic data
Target
achievable?
Yes
27. OUTPUT 2.3 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.3 Air and waste management data and statistics are
improved for policy-relevant use
Indicator 2. No. of municipalities raising public awareness on air pollution from
Fine Particulate Matter
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 20 municipalities in at least 4 countries < can be more through Co-
operation with Covenant of Mayors >
Progress Conceptual work on awareness action started; plan to
invite Covenant of Mayors East for joint awareness action on Clean
Air Day (Sep) and follow-up during the heating season 2023/2024
Target
achievable?
Yes - if co-operation with Covenant of Mayors East works: added
value is joint consideration of the climate and clean air agenda
28. CALL FOR JOINT ACTION
• Prepare joint messages
for Clean Air Day – 7 Sep
2023 – to signatories in
Partner Countries
• Sources of greenhouse gases and
air pollutants are often the same
• Individual health is often a stronger
driver than climate change
29. OUTPUT 2.3 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.3 Air and waste management data and statistics are
improved for policy-relevant use
Indicator 3. No. of countries with operational near-to-real-time air quality data
contribution to the European air Quality Index
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 2 (= Georgia +1)
Progress GE uses index & reconnects to EEA (which minimizes co-
operation); AZ is ready to explore, first at national level; MD first needs
air quality management software; UA still explores the use
of the European index
Target
achievable?
Yes
30. AIR QUALITY MONITORING & DATA MANAGEMENT
Georgia – up-to-date air quality data according European Air Quality index
30
31. OUTPUT 2.3 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.3 Air and waste management data and statistics are
improved for policy-relevant use
Indicator 4. No. of countries that improved waste management data collection
and use
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 4
Progress GE improves reporting on Extended Producer Responsibility Waste
Streams; UA develops Waste Reporting Regulation; AZ is interested to
improve its Municipal Waste Reporting ordinance; MD switches from
paper to electronic reporting; AM statistics promote „data stewardship“
Target
achievable?
Yes
32. OUTPUT 2.4 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.4 Open data and citizens’ participation in data collection and
analysis are further operationalised
Indicator 1. No. of countries that made progress on the implementation of the open data
roadmaps
2. No. of additional countries that made progress with online access to datasets
(as integration is a 2nd priority)
Baseline 1. 0
2. 0
Target (2024) 1. 5 with progress on some of the roadmap recommendations
2. 3
Progress 1. 2 with first progress on some of the roadmap recommendations
2. 2 (AM, UA) with on-going contracts
Target
achievable?
Yes, depending on involvement of beneficiaries in AZ, MD, GE
33. OUTPUT 2.4 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.4 Open data and citizens’ participation in data collection and
analysis are further operationalised
Indicator 3. No. of countries that took additional measures to improve citizens participation
in data collection and analysis
Baseline 3. 0
Target (2024) 3. 2
Progress 3. 1 (already planned in UA tender)
Target
achievable?
Yes, potentially depending on active interest to develop citizens'
participation
34. OUTPUT 2.4 – INDICATORS & TARGETS – DETAILS
Support:
• From beneficiaries particularly in AZ/GE/MD
Targets at risk:
• Level of progress will depend particularly on technical services involvement
(AZ, GE, MD) and ministerial support (AM, AZ, GE, MD)
Follow-up tasks:
• Develop data governance framework (AM, MD)
• Reinforce main entry point for data access (AM, AZ, GE, MD)
• Reinforce national water information systems facilitating interoperability (AM,
AZ, GE, MD)
• Develop metadata of existing datasets (all countries)
• Support maturity reports about indicators production (all countries)
34
35. OUTPUT 2.5 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.5 International sharing of data and networking is maintained
Indicator 1. For each partner country: % of reporting obligation (due until mid-
2024) with focus on UNECE multilateral agreements, which are
submitted in time and with all available national data
Baseline % at previous deadline for the same reporting obligations,
as established in the 2022 baseline report
Target (2024) 4 countries with increased %
Progress Initial analysis of reporting obligations (multi-thematic) was done -
Focus will be on air (besides reporting under Air Convention, also focus
on 2023 SEIS reporting), waste & circular economy (focus on SEIS
reporting 2024) and water (reporting under Water Convention and SDG
6.5.2 with Component 1) in order to not overload countries: this is
based on priorities identified
Target
achievable?
Yes; depending on commitment from Beneficiaries
36. OUTPUT 2.5 – INDICATORS & TARGETS
Output 2.5 International sharing of data and networking is maintained
Indicator 2. No. of partner countries in regular cooperation with
European Environment Agency
Baseline 0
Target (2024) 3
Progress Concept for working on 10 "transition status" indicators of the European
State of the Environment Report SOER 2025
Target
achievable?
Yes (since this is feasible also without additional effort of EEA)
38. CO-OPERATING WITH EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY
• Mid-term - Develop/negotiate for Eastern Neighbourhood EU Accession and
Partner Countries a co-operating countries programme with the European
Environment Agency comparable to the EEA/Eionet integration programme
for Western Balkan countries
• Short-term - Associate co-operating Eastern EU Accession and Partner
Countries to the “country space” development process of the European State
of the Environment Report (SoER) 2025
minimum aim is to collect and
assess/present/publish validated data
for SOER 2025 indicators which assess
current country performance towards
policy/science based target or treshold
39. 39
Indicator Policy target and/or science-based threshold Source
EEA work area 1 – biodiversity and ecosystems
Area under organic
farming
At least 25% of the EU agricultural area under organic
farming by 2030
NEW EEA indicator
Designated terrestrial and
marine protected areas
Legally protect 30% of the EU’s land and sea area by
2030
Existing EEA indicator
(a) terrestrial, b) marine)
Net land take No net land take by 2050 Existing EEA indicator
(+ EEA land take viewer)
EEA work area 2 – climate change mitigation and adaptation
LULUCF emissions Increase net GHG removals by carbon sinks from the
LULUCF sector to - 310 million tons CO2 equivalent by
2030
NEW EEA indicator
GHG emissions Reduce net GHG emissions by at least -55% by 2030
from 1990 levels
Existing EEA indicator (+ EEA
GHG data viewer)
Share of renewable
energy in energy
consumption
At least [45%] of energy from renewable sources in gross
final energy consumption by 2030
Existing EEA indicator
Share of buses and trains
in total passenger
transport
Increase the share of collective transport modes (buses,
coaches and trains)
NEW EEA indicator
EEA work area 3 – human health and the environment
Health impacts of
exposure to fine
particulate matter in
Europe
Reduce premature deaths from air pollution by 55%
(from 2005 levels) by 2030
NEW EEA indicator
EEA work area 4 – Resource use and circular economy
Total waste generation Significantly reduce the total amount of waste generated
by 2030
Existing EEA indicator
Circular material use rate Double the ratio of circular material use by 2030
compared to 2020
Existing EEA indicator
40. DIALOGUE ON SOER 2025 TRANSITION INDICATORS
• Define for each theme/indicator the relevant counterpart institution and
expert(s) in the Partner countries
• Check relevance of defined policy target and/or science-based thresholds for
Ukraine (in light of national policy and EU Accession/Association process)
• Research and validate national data for “current performance” indicators
• Dialogue with EEA on presentation of results in or in parallel to SOER25
41. NO WATER INDICATOR IN SOER 2025 "COUNTRY SPACE"
• No EEA indicator met the citeria for time series, comparability, policy target
• Potential candidate SDG Indicator 6.3.2 Ambient water quality for which
UNEP initiates next “data drive” in July 2023 (after 2017 and 2020)
Currently no
comparable SDG
6.3.2 data sets for
European countries
due to incomplete
uncoordinated
reporting and
nationally different
target values
42. C&V – INDICATORS AND TARGETS
42
Objectives Progress (since 2022)
1. Ensure visibility of the EU
support
• Visual identity & templates
• Website >2,000 unique visitors
• FB >1,000 followers
• Programme featured monthly in 2 newsletters (Green Economy, EUD MD)
• Green Dates: 341 participants (AM, UA) 163,000 reaches on social
media
• 28 news items from EaP media mention the programme
• 43 news items from EU channels mention the programme
2. Communicate progress of
EaP countries to the
international community
• Participation to international or regional conferences:
16 AM, 11 AZ, 15 GE, 14 MD, 6 UA (as of inception phase)
3. Support understanding of
important concepts to direct
beneficiaries
• 85 workshops, training & meetings held
• 3,000 participants (57% women, 43% men)
4. Raise awareness on water
issues and air pollution to direct
and indirect beneficiaries
• Water issues: regular activities in AM, UA, GE (green dates & river days)
• Air pollution: UA workshop for Clean Air Day in Sept 2022
5. Share information between
partners
• Website calendar
• Share point
• Regular meetings
47. C&V UPCOMING PRODUCTS AND ACTIONS
47
what when target audience
Video of water
monitoring surveys
Summer-Autumn 2023 Large public in the EaP
countries, EU channels
Information materials for
consultation on RBMPs
Autumn-Winter 2023 Stakeholders in the river
basins (AM, GE, UA)
EUstudent week back to
back with EU4Energy
Autumn 2023 (October) EaP students
Programme leaflet
(results)
End 2023 – early 2024 EaP beneficiaries, EU
Cooperation with
Covenant of Mayors
East for raising
awareness on air quality
Heating season 2023 EaP municipalities
48. THANK YOU
https://eu4waterdata.eu/en/
For more information on the EU4Environment - Water Resources and Environmental
Data in Eastern Partner Countries programme, please go to our website below, where
you can sign up for the Newsletter and learn about upcoming events.