The document summarizes a presentation on ethical social media marketing for lawyers. It discusses which social media platforms lawyers should focus on, including LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, and Google+. It also covers social media scheduling tools and ethics considerations for lawyers using social media, such as not making misleading statements or characterizing the quality of services. The presentation provides tips on optimizing profiles, examples of what lawyers are doing in 2013, and references various ethics rules and opinions.
Worcester County Bar Association Presents The LinkedIn LawyerDavid Barrett
The WCBA Law Office Technology Section presents "The LinkedIn Lawyer"
Thursday, April 8, 2010
4:00pm - 6:30pm
Worcester District Registry of Deeds Commonwealth Room
90 Front Street
Worcester, MA
David will demonstrate how the use of social media tools like Linkedin, Facebook, Twitter and legal blawging may enhance your legal practice. Topics will include: Generating legal referrals with social media, social media and legal ethics and social media for the busy professional.
$10.00 for WCBA Members
$40.00 for Non-Member
Seating is limited so please register in advance by contacting the WCBA office at 508-752-1311. Door registration will be accepted.
For questions please contact the Worcester County Bar Association, 19 Norwich Street, Worcester, MA 01608.
The basics for building one's legal practice using (among other social networking tools) TWITTER for the Cool Twitter Conference in Los Angeles at the House of Blues
Learn how to develop your 2010 Marketing Plan using the PPT and accompanying materials from the webinar we conducted on 2-11-2010 for the Ohio State Bar Association.
Worcester County Bar Association Presents The LinkedIn LawyerDavid Barrett
The WCBA Law Office Technology Section presents "The LinkedIn Lawyer"
Thursday, April 8, 2010
4:00pm - 6:30pm
Worcester District Registry of Deeds Commonwealth Room
90 Front Street
Worcester, MA
David will demonstrate how the use of social media tools like Linkedin, Facebook, Twitter and legal blawging may enhance your legal practice. Topics will include: Generating legal referrals with social media, social media and legal ethics and social media for the busy professional.
$10.00 for WCBA Members
$40.00 for Non-Member
Seating is limited so please register in advance by contacting the WCBA office at 508-752-1311. Door registration will be accepted.
For questions please contact the Worcester County Bar Association, 19 Norwich Street, Worcester, MA 01608.
The basics for building one's legal practice using (among other social networking tools) TWITTER for the Cool Twitter Conference in Los Angeles at the House of Blues
Learn how to develop your 2010 Marketing Plan using the PPT and accompanying materials from the webinar we conducted on 2-11-2010 for the Ohio State Bar Association.
Presentation on the effect of social media on crime to the Junior Chamber International's Coconut Grove Chapter. The presentation addresses how professionals use social media to promote their practice, and how police are using social media to prosecute criminals.
Social media background checks policy developmentMike McCarty
Social Media has exploded in recent years and employers realize that social media background checks should be an important part of their hiring process. However, this can be a legal minefield. Join Safe Hiring Solutions CEO and attorney Steve Koers for a look at social media background checks policy development.
Presentation on the effect of social media on crime to the Junior Chamber International's Coconut Grove Chapter. The presentation addresses how professionals use social media to promote their practice, and how police are using social media to prosecute criminals.
Social media background checks policy developmentMike McCarty
Social Media has exploded in recent years and employers realize that social media background checks should be an important part of their hiring process. However, this can be a legal minefield. Join Safe Hiring Solutions CEO and attorney Steve Koers for a look at social media background checks policy development.
Social Networking for Financial Advisorsbengilbert
Identify how Financial Advisors can use social networking technology to supplement their existing professional networks. Includes the latest information on SEC and FINRA compliance. Please note that this is the first part of the presentation and Sheri Fitts did an extensive tour through LinkedIn.
How Lawyers Can Harness the Power of Social MediaCarolyn Elefant
Based on the book, Social Media for Lawyers: the Next Frontier, this presentation shares some practical, goal-centric ways that lawyers can use social media to find jobs, network and seek out new opportunities.
Unlock the full potential of your LinkedIn profile and get real results with these expert tips from lawyer, practice management consultant, and author of "LinkedIn in One Hour for Lawyers," Allison Shields. Use LinkedIn as a tool to build your reputation and showcase your expertise so you can stay “top of mind” with your network and grow your practice.
Risks and opportunities for using social media for government transparencyStan Skrabut, Ed.D.
This presentation reviews guidelines that government agencies should follow to ensure laws and regulations are met while providing a communication outlet for citizens.
Looking beyond the CV: Developing a LinkedIn ProfileSue Beckingham
Looking beyond the CV: Developing a LinkedIn profile and understanding how social media is used in a professional context within workplace and by prospective employers.
Social networking presentation for Cincinnati Paralegal Association, February 25, 2010. Defines social networking, demonstrates general sites as well as several for the legal community, and addresses risks and opportunities.
How to Web 2.0: Hands-On Guidance to Social Networking and New Technologies f...Leora Maccabee
Written materials to accompany my PowerPoint presentation at the Minnesota Continuing Legal Education's 2009 Midwest Intellectual Property Institute on September 25, 2009.
Social Media Policy Essentials for Lenders and BrokersSmarsh
Learn how to adopt and enforce social media policies that make sense for the mortgage industry, including:
-What elements should be included
-Best practices for developing a social media policy
-How to enforce a policy once it's made
10 simple steps for creating a social media strategy v2Samantha Collier
Natalie Alesi and Samantha Collier presented “Developing a Social Media Strategy” on March 21, 2012.
About the Program
Social media can no longer be ignored; it has infiltrated our businesses on all levels. So, How do you create a strategy that will work for your practice? Natalie and Samantha will present real world examples of effective social media use by law firms, and will offer a ‘how-to’ for creating and implementing a social business strategy.
Social Media University: Ramping Up Your Social Media Community Part 1Natalie Alesi
We've all used social media tools, but how do we take advantage of them for work? With multiple generations in the workforce and myriad communication methods available, which tools work best for business development, research, referral generation and establishing yourself as a social authority on the topic of interest to your community? Join us as we take a hands-on, scenario-based look at popular social media tools and platforms and how to incorporate them into our everyday business processes. We’ll also cover advanced features you can use for your own social media account to make the best, most secure use of these tools. This is a hands-on session, and attendees should have at minimum LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Google+ accounts set up and ready for use. Downloading the mobile apps for each tool and having accounts for Instagram, Pinterest and Flickr will also be useful.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Generating a custom Ruby SDK for your web service or Rails API using Smithyg2nightmarescribd
Have you ever wanted a Ruby client API to communicate with your web service? Smithy is a protocol-agnostic language for defining services and SDKs. Smithy Ruby is an implementation of Smithy that generates a Ruby SDK using a Smithy model. In this talk, we will explore Smithy and Smithy Ruby to learn how to generate custom feature-rich SDKs that can communicate with any web service, such as a Rails JSON API.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !KatiaHIMEUR1
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Passkeys and the Road Ahead.pdf
Ethical social media marketing for lawyers june 20
1. Ethical Social Media
Marketing for Lawyers:
Tips and Strategies
When: June 20, 2013 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM EST
Speakers: Natalie Alesi and Samantha Collier
2. Agenda
1. Social Media for Law Firms Overview
2. Which Social Media Platforms to Focus On
3. Social Media Scheduling
4. Social Media Ethics for Lawyers
12. Lawyers Use LinkedIn Because:
• Their clients are using LinkedIn. According to Kevin
O’Keefe, 9 out of 10 use executives often.
• Clients and potential clients want to research you on
LinkedIn.
• It’s known as the “business” social network and people are
joining at a rate of two people per second.
13. Don’t Forget to Optimize Your Profile:
Professional picture you wouldn’t mind your
grandmother seeing
A catchy headline that describes your practice
Utilize your summary section and include keywords
describing the type of work you want (SEO)
Add all of your contact information
Customize your URL
http://www.linkedin.com/in/yourname
Add your previous employment and education
Join some groups
14. Lawyers Use Twitter Because:
• Keep up to date regarding news and current events
• Network with colleagues, potential clients and referral
sources
• Share your blog posts, 3rd party articles and other
interesting content to build expert reputation
• Engage in real time conversation
15. Lawyers Use Facebook Because:
• The number one source of work is word-of-mouth
referrals and recommendations. Your Facebook network is
full of family, friends, school chums, colleagues, etc.
• You can easily share work related content a couple times a
week so if the need arises for your services, your name
comes to mind.
• You should create a Facebook Page for your firm at the
very least.
16. Lawyers Use Google+ Because:
• It has become the second largest social network.
• The audience is different than the other social channels.
• You can create Communities.
• It helps with your Author Rank and establishes Authorship.
17. Social Media Management Tools:
• All you to easily filter conversations based on your
interests.
• You have the ability to schedule posts during the week
when you have the time to manage your accounts.
• You can access these on your mobile devices for quick easy
reading, sharing and having those conversations.
20. What do the rules and ethics
opinions say about lawyers
use of social media?
21. Bland v. Roberts –
A Facebook
“like” is not constitutionally
protected speech
22. Six states passed legislation
regarding employers' access to
employee/applicant social media
accounts
23. Despite lawyers’ fears, states are receiving few, if
any, bar complaints arising out of lawyers use of
the Internet for marketing and business
development. Grievances related to lawyers’
marketing efforts are arising out of non internet-
based activities. ~Kevin O’Keefe
24. PhoneDog LLC v Noah Kravitz
Employer-employee litigation
over ownership of social media
accounts
28. Attorney may post information about her practice on Facebook, Twitter, or other social media
websites, but those postings may be subject to compliance with rule 1-400 if their content can be
considered to be “concerning the availability for professional employment.” Such communications
also may be subject to the relevant sections of California Business and Professions Code sections 6157
et seq.
CONCLUSION
31. Can a lawyer advise a client in
litigation to delete their profile?
32. If you do use social media for promoting your
law firm or yourself, you must comply with the
general regulations set forth in lawyer
advertising rules…
33. If you protect your tweets and someone has
signed up to receive your information, do the
rules apply?
38. Lawyer is responsible for the content for the
information they post on their page but is not
responsible for information posted on their
page by a 3rd party, unless the lawyer uses
the 3rd party content to break advertising
rules.
39. Mobile State Bar Apps
Hawaii, Maryland, New York, Ohio, Virginia and more recently Arizona
42. Natalie Alesi
LegalersWelcome, Inc.
m. 609.447.1020
nalesi@legalerswelcome.com
Connect with me
Blog
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
Samantha Collier
Social Media for Law Firms &
Shift Digital
samanthataracollier@gmail.com
Connect with me
Blog
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
Thank YOU
Editor's Notes
Make sure you website is designed for mobile access. This is becoming more and more important with the rise of the mobile workforce.
You already have a reputation, so why not build it online with the world as your audience. You are no longer limited to a specific demographic just because you physically may live in one area.
Using Hashtags, engaged presentations.
Video Bios and YouTube Channels
Blogging, Blogging, Blogging
Having conversations on Twitter
Engaging on LinkedIn
Creating Social Business Strategies for Their Practices
http://socialmediatoday.com/lizgross144/1516661/how-add-live-twitter-feed-your-powerpoint-presentation
Talk about how to turn off the updates in the settings.
I am not a lawyer, this is based on research from the trenches and experience with clients. I am not an ethics guru.
ABA Model Rules
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents.html
Information About Legal ServicesRule 7.2 Advertising
(a) Subject to the requirements of Rules 7.1 and 7.3, a lawyer may advertise services through written, recorded or electronic communication, including public media.
(b) A lawyer shall not give anything of value to a person for recommending the lawyer's services except that a lawyer may
(1) pay the reasonable costs of advertisements or communications permitted by this Rule;
(2) pay the usual charges of a legal service plan or a not-for-profit or qualified lawyer referral service. A qualified lawyer referral service is a lawyer referral service that has been approved by an appropriate regulatory authority;
(3) pay for a law practice in accordance with Rule 1.17; and
(4) refer clients to another lawyer or a nonlawyer professional pursuant to an agreement not otherwise prohibited under these Rules that provides for the other person to refer clients or customers to the lawyer, if
(i) the reciprocal referral agreement is not exclusive, and
(ii) the client is informed of the existence and nature of the agreement.
(c) Any communication made pursuant to this rule shall include the name and office address of at least one lawyer or law firm responsible for its content.
http://www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/130131-Socially-Aware.pdf
Former employees of the Hamptons
Sheriff’s Office in Virginia who were
fired by Sheriff BJ Roberts, sued
claiming they were fired for having
supported an opposing candidate in
a local election. Two of the plaintiffs
had “liked” the opposing candidate’s
Facebook page, which they claimed
was an act of constitutionally
protected speech. A federal district
court in Virginia, however, ruled that
a Facebook “like” “. . . is insufficient
speech to merit constitutional
protection”; according to the court,
“liking” involves no actual statement,
and constitutionally protected speech
could not be inferred from “one click
of a button.”
This case explored the increasinglyimportant intersection of free speech
and social media with the court
finding that a “like” was insufficient
to warrant constitutional protection.
The decision has provoked much
criticism, and it will be interesting to
see whether other courts will follow
the Bland court’s lead or take a
different approach.
California, Delaware, Illinois,
Maryland, Michigan and New Jersey
enacted legislation that prohibits an
employer from requesting or requiring
an employee or applicant to disclose a
user name or password for his or her
personal social media account.
Such legislation will likely become
more prevalent in 2013; Texas has a
similar proposed bill, and California
has proposed a bill that would
expand its current protections for
private employees to also include
public employees
http://www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/130131-Socially-Aware.pdf
2012 saw the settlement of one case,
and continued litigation in two other
cases, all involving the ownership
of business-related social media
accounts maintained by current or
former employees.
In the settled case of PhoneDog LLC
v. Noah Kravitz, employer sued
employee after the employee left
the company but retained a Twitter
account (and its 17,000 followers)
that he had maintained while working
for the employer. The terms of the
settlement are confidential, but news
reports indicated that the settlement
allowed the employee to keep the
account and its followers.
In two other pending cases, Eagle v.
Edcomm andMaremont v. Susan
Fredman Design Group LTD, social
media accounts originally created
by employees were later altered or
used by the employer without the
employees’ consent.
These cases are reminders that, with the
growing prevalence of business-related
social media, employers need to create
clear policies regarding the treatment of
work-related social media accounts.
http://kevin.lexblog.com/2012/06/15/virginia-court-first-amendment-protection-for-lawyer-bloggers/
Last fall Richmond criminal defense lawyer Horace Hunter was hit with a public reprimand by the Virginia Bar for blogging about his own cases and not including an ‘advertising disclaimer’ on his blog.
As reported by Bob Ambrogi yesterday, the Portsmouth Circuit Court overturned the finding of misconduct as it pertained to blogging about Hunter’s cases.
The panel ruled that a lawyer has a First Amendment right to blog about his own cases, at least with regard to information that is already available on the public record. (Needless to say, you should never blog about privileged client information.)
The court did uphold the Bar’s ruling that an advertising disclaimer was required on Hunter’s blog and that Hunter may not reveal client confidences on his blog.
Legal ethics guru, Attorney Will Hornsby, cautions not to give to much weight to the Hunter outcome as its findings may not apply to all states.
So, the question becomes whether a lawyer may blog, or otherwise communicate information in advertising material, about the representation if that information is otherwise publically known or available. Here’s the problem with coming to that conclusion – the states have different standards governing the lawyer’s obligation to maintain information confidential. Virginia and a minority of states have an ethics rule (usually Rule 1.6) that requires a lawyer to maintain “secrets and confidences.” On the other hand, Rule 1.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the majority of states that have adopted it require that a lawyer not reveal “information relating to the representation.”
Seemingly, “information relating to the representation” is far broader than “secrets and confidences” in the marketing arena. If information is public knowledge, it is hardly a secret. However, “information relating to the representation” clearly, in my mind, covers information that is publically available. It is the client’s right that the lawyer not reveal information. Under either version of the rule, the client may provide consent for the lawyer to reveal the information. But, that decision rests with the client, and in the Model Rules states, that decision is designed to extend to information that may otherwise be publically known.
ABA Model Rules
Transactions With Persons Other Than ClientsRule 4.2 Communication With Person Represented By Counsel
In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order.
Facts:
Attorney has a personal profile page on a social media website. Attorney regularly posts comments about both her
personal life and professional practice on her personal profile page. Only individuals whom the Attorney has
approved to view her personal page may view this content (in Facebook parlance, whom she has “friended”).2/
Attorney has about 500 approved contacts or “friends,” who are a mix of personal and professional acquaintances,
including some persons whom Attorney does not even know.
#1 – Not a violation - In the Committee’s opinion, this statement, standing alone, is not a communication under rule 1-400(a) because it is
not a message or offer “concerning the availability for professional employment,” whatever Attorney’s subjective
motive for sending it.11/ Attorney status postings that simply announce recent victories without an accompanying
offer about the availability for professional employment generally will not qualify as a communication.
#2 – Violation - Similarly, the statement “Another great victory in court today!” standing alone is not a communication under rule
1-400(a) because it is not a message or offer “concerning the availability for professional employment.” However,
the addition of the text, “[w]ho wants to be next?” meets the definition of a “communication” because it suggests
availability for professional employment. Thus, it is subject to rule 1-400(D) and rule 1-400’s Standards.
#3 – Violation - In the Committee’s opinion, this language also qualifies as a “communication” because the words “tell your friends
to check out my website,” in this context, convey a message or offer “concerning the availability for professional
employment.” It appears that Attorney is asking the reader to tell others to look at her website so that they may
consider hiring her. This language therefore is subject to the adverse presumption in rule 1-400(E), Standard 5 (e.g.,
it must contain the word “Advertisement” or a similar word) and the preservation requirement in rule 1-400(F).1
#4 – Violation - Again, the Committee concludes that this posting is a “communication” under rule 1-400(A), due primarily to the
second sentence.
A communication has to include an offer about availability for professional employment so the “free” consultation
language at first might indicate the posting is not a communication. Yet the rule does not limit “communications” to
messages seeking financial compensation for services.
#5 – Not a violation - In this instance, we believe the statement does not concern “availability for professional employment.” The attorney
is merely relaying information regarding an article that she has published, and is offering to provide copies
This is where we can discuss - Can lawyers answer questions on Quora, LawPivot or Avvo?
http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2013/05/do-linkedin-endorsements-violate-legal-ethics.html
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/do_linkedin_endorsements_violate_legal_ethics/
Opinions are all over the place. According to Nancy Myrland.
At High Tech Intellectual Property Legal Blog, California lawyer Judith Szepesi takes the position that these endorsements do not violate Model Rule 7.1 because they are not statements by the lawyer about his or her own skills. She adds, however, that under California’s rules, these endorsements may constitute testimonials and require the lawyer’s LinkedIn profile to carry a disclaimer.
I am no ethics expert. However, I think it is significant that LinkedIn provides the ability to “hide” endorsements others have given you. (You can hide any single endorsement or choose to hide all endorsements by default.) If someone gives you an endorsement that you believe is false or misleading, and if you do not remove it, then you are effectively accepting it and allowing it to be communicated to anyone who views your LinkedIn profile. To my mind, that brings it within the purview of Model Rule 7.1.
Specialization for ABA
Information About Legal ServicesRule 7.4 Communication of Fields of Practice and Specialization
(a) A lawyer may communicate the fact that the lawyer does or does not practice in particular fields of law.
(b) A lawyer admitted to engage in patent practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office may use the designation "Patent Attorney" or a substantially similar designation.
(c) A lawyer engaged in Admiralty practice may use the designation "Admiralty," "Proctor in Admiralty" or a substantially similar designation.
(d) A lawyer shall not state or imply that a lawyer is certified as a specialist in a particular field of law, unless:
(1) the lawyer has been certified as a specialist by an organization that has been approved by an appropriate state authority or that has been accredited by the American Bar Association; and
(2) the name of the certifying organization is clearly identified in the communication.
Information About Legal Services
Rule 7.3 Solicitation of Clients
(a) A lawyer shall not by in‑person, live telephone or real-time electronic contact solicit professional employment when a significant motive for the lawyer's doing so is the lawyer's pecuniary gain, unless the person contacted:
(1) is a lawyer; or
(2) has a family, close personal, or prior professional relationship with the lawyer.
(b) A lawyer shall not solicit professional employment by written, recorded or electronic communication or by in‑person, telephone or real-time electronic contact even when not otherwise prohibited by paragraph (a), if:
(1) the target of the solicitation has made known to the lawyer a desire not to be solicited by the lawyer; or
(2) the solicitation involves coercion, duress or harassment.
(c) Every written, recorded or electronic communication from a lawyer soliciting professional employment from anyone known to be in need of legal services in a particular matter shall include the words "Advertising Material" on the outside envelope, if any, and at the beginning and ending of any recorded or electronic communication, unless the recipient of the communication is a person specified in paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2).
(d) Notwithstanding the prohibitions in paragraph (a), a lawyer may participate with a prepaid or group legal service plan operated by an organization not owned or directed by the lawyer that uses in‑person or telephone contact to solicit memberships or subscriptions for the plan from persons who are not known to need legal services in a particular matter covered by the plan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_advice
According to Wikipedia - legal advice is the giving of a formal opinion regarding the substance or procedure of the law, usually received from a solicitor, barrister or lawyer, ordinarily in exchange for financial or other tangible compensation. Advice given without remuneration is normally referred to as being pro bono publico (in the public good), or colloquially, pro bono.
With the advent of the internet, many services have been established to provide individuals the power to conduct their own legal research or prepare their own legal documents. Some companies have taken it a step further by offering answers to legal questions directly through their web services.
This is tricky because of eDiscovery and you would not want to remove information for failure to preserve. Once it’s out there, it’s out there. Especially on social media sites. Someone could easily screep cap or capture a shared post or update. HOWEVER, depending on the facts of the case it could be a possibility. There is no solid guidance on this, so based on the facts of the case and the desired ruling, the answer would be, it depends.
The Standing Committee on Advertising (Florida Bar) is of the opinion that a page on a networking site is sufficiently similar to a website of a lawyer or law firm that pages on networking sites are not required to be filed with The Florida Bar for review.
FLORIDA BAR RULES
Lawyers who post information to Twitter whose postings are generally accessible are subject to the lawyer advertising regulations set forth in Rule 4-7.2 as above. A lawyer may post information via Twitter and may restrict access to the posts to the lawyer’s followers, who are persons who have specifically signed up to receive posts from that lawyer. If access to a lawyer’s Twitter postings is restricted to the followers of the particular lawyer, the information posted there is information at the request of a prospective client and is not subject to the lawyer advertising rules under Rule 4-7.1(h). The information remains subject to the general misconduct rule, which prohibits any conduct involving fraud, deceit, dishonesty or misrepresentation under Rules 4-7.1(i) and 4-8.4(c). Any communications that a lawyer makes on an unsolicited basis to prospective clients to obtain “followers” is subject to the lawyer advertising rules, as with any other social media as noted above.
In 1996 Congress enacted Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230. Section 230 grants interactive internet service providers (such as Facebook, Yelp, YouTube, and Twitter) immunity from civil defamation claims for user-created content.
What this means in simple terms is that if you or your business is defamed on Facebook or Twitter, you can’t sue Facebook or Twitter, and you can’t force Facebook or Twitter to remove the defamatory postings. Section 230 forces you to attempt to track down the user who originally posted the speech—often a virtual impossibility in this day and age when the vast majority of defamatory postings on the internet are done anonymously.
Lawyer must remove content that violates rules. Example:
A comment on a facebook page
A comment on a LinkedIn status update
If he or she can’t remove it, ask the party to do so. If the party doesn’t remove it, lawyer isn’t liable