Erwin Rommel Essay

Erwin Rommel Essay
ERWIN ROMMEL
Erwin Rommel Jr. was born on November 15, 1891 in Swabian. His father Erwin Rommel Sr., was a
schoolmaster in Heidenheim in Wurttemberg , and Rommel's mother was Helene von Luz was a
daughter of the local Regierungs–President.
As a child, he was even tempered and was unremarkable academically and athletically. After high
school, Rommel Jr. was thinking of applying to the Zeppelin works at
Friederichshafen, but his father, an ex–artillery officer, advised him to go to the army instead. In
July, 1910, Rommel became a cadet with the 124th Wurttemberg Infantry Regiment in the 26th
Infantry Division of the German Imperial Infantry. He served as cadet in the Army until ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Then Rommel reorganized another confused company, and started to return to his own unit. On the
way, 5 French soldiers appeared ahead of him. Rommel opened fire and dropped two of them, only
to run out of ammunition. Rommel quickly fixed his bayonet and charged only to be wounded with
a fist sized exit wound and to be rewarded with an Iron Cross and Second Class for bravery. Also
before World War 1 ended Rommel received a Pour le Merite. Rommel's son, Manfred was born in
December 1928, on Christmas Eve.
In September 1934, Rommel first met Hitler. Rommel was devoted to Hitler because of Hitler's
acceptance of the army over the SA. Rommel thought Hitler was a good man, and he was swept up
in the patriotic pride that now ran rampant throughout Germany. Hitler was just as impressed with
Rommel, and Rommel's character soon gained him the position of Major–General of Hitler's Special
Guard, a very prestigious honor. Soon Rommel and Hitler became close friends. Hitler consulted
with Rommel on where he would like to go from there. Rommel told him he would like to lead an
armored division.
In early February, 1940, Rommel was appointed to command the 7th Panzer Division, now stationed
at Godesberg in the west and soon deployed in the nearby valley of the Ahr. He took leave of Hitler
and was given an inscribed copy of Mein
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Battle Of The War Periods For Every Army
Armies perfect how to fight the last war, just in time for the next. This unattributed adage has
foreshadowed the inter–war periods for every army; a repeatable cycle where the typical outcome is
the outbreak of a different type of warfare resulting in a change of tactics, techniques, and
procedures at the cost of Soldier 's lives. This is why the study of military history holds a heavy
emphasis in the United States Army. Whether you are applying to the Command and General Staff
College, any Non–Commissioned Officer Educational Schools, or even attending a Promotion
Board, knowing and being able to communicate effectively about Military History is required. The
Battle of Kasserine Pass is a perfect example of the "Fight the Last War" ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
By mid February 1943, the Axis eastern front has settled on the Mareth Line in an attempt to protect
the port city of Gabes. On the western front of the African Campaign, Allied troops continued to
push through the Atlas Mountains of western Tunisia with the intention of splitting the Axis forces
in two. Attempting to push the Allies back, the 21st Panzer Division of Army Group Africa under
the command of General Hans–Jurgen von Arnim attacked the French defenders in the town of Faïd
on January 30. The Combat Commands of the 1st Armored Division were sent in a futile attempt to
cauterize the line. Not being able to withstand the attack, the 1st Armored Division and other
elements of U.S. II Corps, under the command of Major General Fredendall, withdrew back into the
Atlas mountain range, with the Axis forces blocking the exits. With no strong defensive positions
the U.S. II Corps redeployed to the Kasserine and Sbiba Passes. Field Marshall Rommel
strategically thought that taking Kasserine pass would give protection to the coastal region to the
east, capture supplies left behind by the Americans, and be a forward staging area to launch new
attacks. On February 14, 1943 General Heinz Ziegler attacked the town Sidi Bou Zid, located
roughly 10 miles west of Faïd. At 04:00 a.m., under the command of General Heinz Ziegler, 140
German tanks, including 12

General George S. Patton Jr.
As a leader and Soldier in the United States Army, I have looked for individuals that set a
benchmark to strive towards. Individuals that lead Soldiers, develop solid plans, and achieve those
plans no matter the difficulty. For me, General George S. Patton Jr. is one such individual. He
exemplified many defining characteristics of what it means to be a true leader of influence through
his character, presence, and intellect. His discipline and unparalleled expertise in his field as a tank
commander were crucial to the successes of the United States during multiple military campaigns.
Although he was known to be brash and flamboyant at times, I believe that this served to further his
presence and embody his unique and effective ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Once given his first command, he led a successful raid killing two of Poncho Villas men while
wounding and capturing three personally. This was an early display of his lead from the front
mentality, show of character, and his swift actions leading to success. Traits that would characterize
him throughout his career.
World War I was a formative time for Patton, as he took an interest in tanks while filling various
postings and awaiting command of an infantry company by General Pershing. Using his growing
influence and swift promotions, Patton was able to take command of the 304th Tank BDE in 1918,
now as a Major. During the battle of Saint Mihiel, Patton rode atop and walked in front of his tanks
in order to inspire his men by instilling esprit de corps and the will to fight. While during the
Meuse–Argonne offensive as part of the US I Corps, he was wounded. Despite being shot through
the leg he continued to command troops and tanks on the ground before finally being evacuated. He
ensured that he delivered his report to the command post before finally agreeing to go to the
hospital. For his efforts he was promoted to Colonel and awarded the Distinguished Service Medal
and Purple Heart.
Patton's actions during World War II were the apex of his career. During the North Africa Campaign,
Patton took command of the US II Corps, after a crushing defeat to the German Afrika Korps as
Kasserine Pass. He introduced changes such as ordering

Essay on Invasion of Normandy
Invasion of Normandy
Invasion of Normandy, also known as D–Day or Operation Overlord, was a cross channel attack
planned by the allies that took place over the English channel. Not only was D–Day the largest
amphibious assault the world had seen, it was a critical point in World War II. (Locke, Alain, ed. Pg
203)
The Invasion of Normandy is when the allies decided that they must take an offense and invade
Germany on their home land if Hitler was to be stopped. The allies put all of their power together,
for failure was not an option. If the invasion was to fail it was quite likely that the United States
would have to postpone their fight against Germany and turn their full attention to the war in the
Pacific, leaving the fate of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Eisenhower felt that operation Overlord was a sound plan in general, but needed a few revisions.
After the disastrous hit–and–run raid in 1942 in Dieppe, planners saw that(Candaela, Kerry. Pg 73)
German defenses were simply too strong and could easily fight off a number of small assaults. So
instead it was decided that it would be better to choose a single main landing where an immense
amount of firepower and soldiers could be concentrated. The invasion site needed to be close to at
least one major port and airbase to allow for efficient supply lines. The decision came down to two
sites, the Pas de Calais across the Strait of Dover, and the beaches of Cotentin. Of the two landings
it was decided that the beaches of Cotentin would be the best landing site for Operation Overlord.
Months ahead of time allies spent day and night producing war materials. When invasion day came
allies had assembled an unbelievable amount of war materials. In total, 5,000 ships, the largest
armada ever, 11,000 aircraft's, and approximately 154,000 British, Canadian and American soldiers,
including 23,000 that were to arrive by parachute and gliders. War materials were only half the
battle.
Deception was the key to the whole invasion. Much time was spent sending small campaigns over to
Germany to cause a ruckus in German defenses, eventually becoming a daily routine. Germans
intelligence never knew if it was the big invasion or just another little deception by the

Book Critique of The Longest Day Essays
Book Critique of The Longest Day
Cornelius Ryan, born in Dublin, Ireland in 1920, worked as a reporter covering the battles in Europe
from 1941–1945 and then the final months of the Pacific Campaign. His articles were printed in
both Reuters and the London Daily Telegraph. His first book was The Longest Day, published in
1959, selling over 4 million copies in 27 different editions. In 1962 a director named Darryl
Zannuck made the book into a movie. Ryan's next book was The Last Battle, published in 1966. His
final book, A Bridge Too Far, was published in 1974. This book was also made into a movie in 1977,
and just recently re–released in 1998 on DVD. Ryan had an extensive collection of materials that he
used to create the large amount of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The period covered in this book is a very short one, covering the building of the Atlantic wall in
little detail, and in great detail, the few days before D–Day and the initial attacks on D–Day itself.
On the German side Hitler has ordered the building of a massive Atlantic Wall to stop any Allied
attackers from landing on the western seaboard, from the Kirkenes to the Pyrenees. After defeat in
Africa, Field Marshall Erwin Rommel is sent to inspect and oversee the wall's completion. After
seeing the horrible state of the wall Rommel worked to complete the wall as quickly as possible. He
had the German and French coast of the English Channel and their beaches filled with mines.
Rommel then placed heavy fortifications behind the beaches to stop any attackers who made it past
the beach defenses. In Great Britain, the Supreme Allied Commander, General Eisenhower was
planning the date to launch the massive attack on Normandy, but his time frame was limited due to a
bad storm in the area. On June 5, 1944 the ships were launched only to be recalled back just 40
miles from the German forts along the coast of Normandy. If Eisenhower did not launch on the 6th,
he wouldn't be able to launch for another two weeks. So the early the next morning the slowest ships
and the

Erwin Rommel : The Greatest Leader
Erwin Rommel was one of Germany's greatest commanders. Born in Heidenheim, Germany, on 15
November 1891, Erwin Rommel was referred to as "the People 's Marshal" by his countrymen.
Having a long career in the military, he began his service in World War I, where he cut his teeth in
combat as a young infantry officer. Over his career, Rommel received several nicknames, none more
famous than "The Desert Fox", given to him by the British soldier he fought against in the deserts of
Africa during World War II. Never one for the political stage, Erwin was a soldier's General. He
much preferred living with the troops then above them. He was however, deeply connected to the
Nazi party, which helped propel his military career. Early in the political party's development,
Rommel admired Hitler. Later, he sees the true evil that Hitler is capable of while serving in Poland
and Africa. When Hitler and the Nazi party offered him a seat in politics, he declined and asked to
command a tank division. He saw tanks as the next major player on the modern battlefield. Famous
for leading from the frontline, Rommel could not accept running battles from a staff room, miles
away. On the12 of February 1940, Rommel received his first field command over the 7th Panzer
Division. While in command of the 7th, Rommel participated in the invasion of Poland, Belgium
and France. The campaigns in Europe helped Rommel develop his employment of blitzkrieg tactics
using combined arms. Although

Remembering Operation Overlord
The planning of Operation Overlord and the invasion were both effected by the lack of equipment
and landing crafts. Operation Overlord was a very advanced operation involving Americans,
Canadians, British, and other allies. The allied forces were going to attack the beaches of Normandy
in France, which was currently under Nazi Control. They attacked five different Beaches: Juno,
Gold, Sword, Utah, and Omaha beach. This operation could lead to the end of World War 2 and the
defeat of the Nazis. In 1943, a year before the invasion, the allies chose who would be in charge of
the invasion. "General Eisenhower was chosen to be in charge of the operation."(Brohier) Allies had
tight security in order to prevent the Germans from learning details about the invasion. He chose
Normandy to be the place of the invasion because it was in reach of Bombers stationed in Britain.
However, the planning did not go as well as expected because of the lack of equipment and landing
crafts because they were in use in other places.
The Allied forces sent out fake troops to Pas de Calais, the tightest place between Britain and
France, to make the Germans think the invasion was there instead of Normandy. They even led
Germany to think the invasion was in other place, for example Norway.
The last couple of Months and weeks before the invasion, "British bombers began to soften up the
German defenses by wrecking railways and bridges" (Brohier 1) so that the German troops could
not make their way to

The World Of The Great Crusade
"You are about to embark upon the Great Crusade, toward which we have striven these many
months. The eyes of the world are upon you" is what was heard by nearly 160,000 allied troops. And
for many, it was the last thing they heard. On June 6th, 1944 one of the biggest invasions in history
was underway, Operation Overlord, more commonly known as the battle of Normandy. With the fall
of France in 1940, and the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, Germany's power seemed endless.
British Prime Minister Winston Churchill believed that even with the help of the United States,
Britain did not have the adequate forces to take back Europe and wished to avoid costly frontal
assaults. (Operation Overlord) In attempts to take back Europe, there were plans and operations such
as operation round up and operation sledgehammer that were put forward in 1942 and 1943 but
neither of them were deemed practical or likely to succeed by the British. In response, the Allies
decided to launch the invasion of French North Africa in 1942, the invasion of Sicily in 1943, and
the invasion of Italy. These invasions did not cause a major impact in the taking back of Europe but
were able to provide plenty of intangibles such as valuable experience in invasions and amphibious
warfare, the use of naval warfare combined with aerial warfare. The decision for a cross–channel
invasion which became the battle of Normandy was taken at the Trident Conference in Washington
in May 1943. With Hitler and Germany

Why Was Erwin Rommel A Hero
With the men surrounding you performing atrocious acts would you stand out from the crowd,
would you refuse the orders of your superiors for the greater good of your men. This is how Erwin
Rommel, a Nazi general, stood out from the people around him, became a hero even though he was
on the wrong side of history, and how he has affected many future events.
To begin on, Erwin Rommel stood out and rejected the Nazi generals that he worked with in many
ways. Although, many people said he was as inhumane and hateful as the rest of the people and he
was a full supporter of the Nazi religion. Erwin rommel was considered to be a rejector of the Nazi
religion and ways. According to www.britannica.com "Rommel had specified that no political
paraphernalia be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He also was known to not be a part of the Nazi party. Rommel was also different from the Nazi
generals by disobeying from orders many times even when they were directly from Hitler himself.
According to http://www.history.com "Despite his reverence for Hitler, Rommel disobeyed for fear
his force would be completely annihilated" this shows that Rommel would disobey Hitler for the
better of his troops instead of letting them die because Hitler wanted to make a point. Also, when
Hitler ordered Rommel to exterminate people that Hitler deemed inferior he did not attack or
capture them. Rommel stood out from his fellow generals in the way he would treat his prisoners
when he captured them. Citing www.historylearningsite.co.uk " Rommel required that the

Desmond Young's Rommel: The Desert Fox?
In Desmond Young 's biography, "Rommel: The Desert Fox" the author gives us a very insight in the
life of Erwin Rommel. Desmond Young a desert war veteran fought in the war, in the British Army
in the Africa. Young was a prisoner of war until the end on the war. Young wrote the book just only
five years after the war. That's what make this book so unique because the war was still fresh in
everyone minds. He interviews Rommel wife, son and some closed friend, that gave very intimate
information about Field Marshall Rommel. Young also interviews two general that served under
Rommel, Much of general Bayerlein and Von Ravenstein Young had private experience of numerous
events and provided insight into Rommel 's from a military life. The Desert Fox is a great book to
read if someone is into reading WWII history, or simply just curious about Rommel. Most of the
book is abut the battle that took place in the Afrika Korp. Because this book was written by a soldier
that fought in the war, the author was able to give us the details incident that happen in the war, also
give the depth insight of Rommel involvement in the plot to assassinate Hitler. He also gives us the
way opponents and contemporizes viewed an interesting look at what was going on at the time and
the way Erwin Rommel. One of his opponent said that about Rommel, he called him a very daring
skillful opponent against us, and, may I say across the havoc of war, a great general. That's the kind
of respect general Rommel

Summary Of War Of The Rats
War of the Rats The Battle of Stalingrad, perhaps the single most critical and certainly one of the
bloodiest battles of World War II, is a great setting for a historical fiction story. His story centers on
a duel to the death between two men: Chief Master Sgt. Vasily Zaitsev, sniper, one of the best of the
Russian army, and a German SS colonel named Heinz Thorvald, the Nazis' greatest marksman.
When Russian snipers led by Zaitsev begin to take a demoralizing toll of German troops, picking
them off like hunters shooting bears, the high command in Berlin dispatches Thorvald to the
battlefield with orders to accomplish a single task: kill Zaitsev. A deadly contest ensues, with
Robbins skillfully building up each of his protagonists as so deadly in their murderous crafts as to
make them feared as a person and well liked as a reader. It is not David versus Goliath, but Hercules
versus Zeus, the manly conflict of two equally matched and equally remorseless adversaries. The
story moreover is based, Robbins writes in the introduction, on two real historical figures, though it
is unclear whether the real Zaitsev and Thorvald engaged in the kind of duel described in "War of
the Rats." Robbins opens with a German lieutenant named Hofstetter who makes the mistake of
tilting his head back to drink from a canteen and is dropped by a single shot from a distant rifle. We,
then, meet his killer, the Russian Zaitsev, who, before World War II, was a hunter on the Siberian
taiga, instructed

Rommel Leadership Traits
AN ANALYTICAL ESSAY ON THE LEADERSHIP TRAITS OF FIELD MARSHAL ERWIN
ROMMEL "Rommel, Rommel, Rommel, Rommel"! he cried. "What else matters but beating him?"
Winston Churchill (Cairo Conference, 8 August 1942) INTRODUCTION 1. Leaders and the
leadership are two perennially significant subjects of human interest. In the military field, the role of
leadership assumes greater significance as the actions of a leader has direct bearing on the lives of
his men and fate of his nation. Therefore the study of leadership is of critical importance to
comprehend and develop the nuances of the art of military leadership. In the same context, study of
military leadership models constructed by great captains is of utmost importance so as to draw
pertinent lessons for the training of future military leadership. The selection of Rommel has great
personal significance for author, his armed forces and by extension militaries of all developing
countries. The significance lies in the fact that Rommel throughout his military career had limited
access to the resources in comparison to his adversaries and no general was able to achieve more
with less than the "desert fox". This perpetual predicament of Rommel, is faced by almost modern
military leaders, who despite ever swelling ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Physical courage. b. Personal leadership or lead from the front. c. Mental flexibility. d. Competence
Rommel as a military leader embodied all of the above key elements to a greater degree. In the
succeeding paragraphs as analysis of his leadership style will be carried out in light of the
Truppenfuhrung elaborated above as well as the model he created for himself and others to follow.
ANALYSIS OF KEY LEADERSHIP TRAITS "Between Rommel and his troops was mutual
understanding which cannot be explained and analysed, but which the gift of gods is. The Afrika
Korps [sic] followed Rommel wherever he led, however hard he drove them...... the men knew that
Rommel was the last man to spare Rommel" Von

North African Campaign Essay
When someone mentions World War Two the first thing that comes to mind is probably D–Day or
Pearl Harbor or maybe even Berlin, while the North African Campaign is often forgotten. Three of
the notable campaigns that occurred in Africa at this time were Operation Torch, Operation Tunisia,
and the Western Desert Campaign; These campaigns took place from June 10th, 1940 to May 13th,
1943. When talking about any war or great struggle, there are three things to know: who were
influential figures of this struggle, what methods or types of warfare they used, and what were the
important victories or defeats. During the second world war, waged on the second largest continent
in the world, there were people who literally changed the outcome of this great struggle. Two of
these people were: Bernard Montgomery fighting for the allies, and Erwin Rommel, the infamous
Desert Fox fighting for the axis.
Montgomery saw action in the First World War as a junior officer of the Royal Warwickshire
Regiment, however this ended prematurely when he was shot through the lung by a sniper. He later
returned to the front three years later in 1917 as a general staff officer before ending the war as chief
of staff of the 47th (2nd London) Division. During the Second World War he commanded the British
Eighth Army from August 1942 in the Western Desert until the final Allied victory in Tunisia in May
1943. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Blitzkrieg in a literal sense means "lightning war" meaning that they would use speed and confusion
to upset the enemy forces. Rommel is credited as being the one who perfected the art of war known
as Blitzkrieg and for good reasons. It's believed that Rommel and Guderian were told under the
command of Hitler to disobey their superiors and to push the front, leaving their flanking forces
behind them to create confusion and surprise for the enemy. Rommel used this method of

Erwin Rommel's Impact On The World War I
Erwin Rommel was born on November 15, 1981 into a simple middle–class southern German
family. Erwin Rommel would enter into military service during 1910 as an officer cadet. He saw his
first action in World War I where he began to show his natural ability as a leader and start his
illustrious career, which peaks during World War II. Erwin Rommel would find himself revered and
respected by Hitler as one of his top generals. He would die before the defeat of Germany on
October 15, 1944 and his death would be shrouded in controversy. During his military career he
established that he was an excellent tactician and respected by his troops and even his enemies.
Erwin Rommel was born into a family that had no established military tradition joined the German
military in 1910. He would enter as an officer cadet and his first assignment was to the 124th
Wurttemberg Infantry Regiment. World War I broke out and Erwin Rommel would find himself
serving in France, Romania, and Italy. He gained notability with his senior officers during the Battle
of Caporetto for his innovative tactics used during the battle. Erwin Rommel quickly established
himself as a competent leader as a lieutenant and frontline infantry officer. Unlike his fellow
officers, he declined advancement to the general staff, which was common practice to remain with
his men on the front line. This dedication to leading on the frontline would result in Erwin Rommel
being wounded two separate times during combat.

Field Marshal Erwin Rommel: The Desert Fox
ERWIN ROMMEL: THE DESERT FOX
On November 18, 1941, acting Lieutenant–Colonel Geoffrey Keyes led a team of British
commandos in storming a heavily guarded building deep in German–controlled Africa. They were to
assassinate Field Marshal Erwin Rommel, or the Desert Fox. Every one of Keyes' men were killed
or captured. Keyes' team hadn't even targeted the right location. Where they expected to find
Rommel 250 miles behind the front lines, the Field Marshal was at the front lines with his troops.
After Keyes' death, Rommel insisted he be given an honorable funeral despite his attempt on
Rommel's life. This represents Rommel perfectly as a dignified, chivalrous, and humane modern–
day knight. (Young 232) Field Marshal Rommel had a major role in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Rommel achieved this legacy by working under some of the worst staff generals of all time, in a
German General Staff that included men proclaimed by Rommel to be "fools" such as Wilhelm
Keitel and Franz Halder (Young 346). Yet Field Marshal Rommel was able to overcome these
obstacles to success with an array of successful strategies such as daring initiative, populist style of
command, and bold use of natural camouflage. Germany's greatest hero, Erwin Rommel was a
towering figure at home and abroad, the victor of France, Gazala, and Kasserine

German Preparations And Strategies Were On The Outcome Of...
What effect did German preparations and strategies have on the outcome of the Normandy invasion?
Let's Build a Wall: An Analysis of German Preparations and How They Affected the Normandy
Landings Germans preparedness (or unpreparedness) was a decisive part of the Normandy Invasion.
Hitler had it right to send Rommel in to shore up the German western defenses, but The Desert Fox
did not have enough time or enough power to make a big enough impact on the invasion. This
would have remarkable repercussions on the outcome of the war. If the Germans had fought harder
or better or smarter the Allies would not have been able to get a foothold. If the Allies did not open
up this western front for the Germans the Soviets would have a much more ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This was the German's equivalent to the Great Wall of China in the sense that it was supposed to
keep the enemy out, but the similarity ends there. "This was a modern defense network consisting of
concrete bunkers, machine gun nests, and trenches" (Trueman). Hitler also knew that these defenses
may not be enough so he put one of his best generals in charge of his Atlantic Wall. This man was
the desert fox, Erwin Rommel.
Rommel knew that a big wall alone would not be enough to prevent the Allies from gaining their
foothold. "Artillery emplacements were supported with machine gun posts and other artillery
emplacements were built inland to give the Wall some form of protection when the expected Allied
landings took place" (Truman). From his past experiences in Africa, the Desert Fox understood the
importance of supporting Artillery with machine guns and vice versa. He also knew that the Allies
would come with a wide variety of forces. So, Rommel too, experimented with a wide variety of
defensive equipments. These included anti tank and anti vehicle obstructions that were strewn all
along the coast of France (Trueman). Rommel's preparations did not stop here, however. The idea
that the next step that a soldier takes could be his last is a terrifying thought. This fear was utilized
by the Germans and many mines were added to the Atlantic Wall per Rommel's discretion. "Six
million mines were laid on beaches in Northern France" (Trueman). This is an

Essay on D-Day
In midsummer 1943, a year before the Anglo–American invasion of Normandy, Adolf Hitler's
Wehrmacht, still occupied all the territory it had gained in the blitzkrieg campaigns of 1939–41 and
most of its Russian conquests of 1941–42. Germany also retained a foothold on the coast of North
Africa, acquired when Germany assisted Italy in 1941. The Russian counteroffensives at Stalingrad
and Kursk pushed back the perimeter of Hitler's Europe in the east. Yet, Hitler and his allies still
controlled the whole of mainland Europe, except for neutral Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, and
Sweden. The Nazi war economy was eclipsed by the war economy of America but was still larger
then Britain and the Soviet Union, except in key areas of tank and aircraft ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They first squashed all thought of Sledgehammer and then succeeded in persuading the Americans
to agree to a North African landing as the principal operation of 1942. Operation "Torch" was the
name for the landing in North Africa. This effectively postponed Roundup again, while subsequent
operations in Sicily and the Italian mainland delayed preparations for the cross–Channel invasion
through 1943 as well. "The postponements were a principal cause of concern at inter–Allied
conferences in Washington, Quebec, Cairo, and Tehran. At the last gathering, Roosevelt and Stalin
combined against Churchill to insist on the adoption of May 1944 as an unalterable date for the
invasion"(World War II). In return, Stalin agreed to mount a simultaneous offensive in Eastern
Europe and to join the war against Japan once Germany had been defeated. The decision taken at
Tehran was a final indication of American determination to stage the cross–Channel invasion and a
defeat for Alan Brooke, Churchill's chief of staff and the principal opponent of premature action.
"Yet despite Brooke's procrastination, the British had in fact been proceeding with plans,
coordinated by Lieutenant General Frederick Morgan, who had been appointed COSSAC (chief of
staff to the supreme Allied commander) at the Anglo–American Casablanca conference in January
1943"(World War II). "His staff's first plan for Operation "Overlord" was a landing in Normandy
between Caen and the Cotentin Peninsula in

Rommel ' Desert Fox '
Rommel aka "Desert Fox" The man best known as the Desert Fox was born 15 November 1891 to
parents Erwin Rommel Senior and Helen von Lutz who named their son Erwin Johannes Eugene
Rommel. Rommel's family was not a military one, his father like his father before him were teachers
while his mother was the daughter of a high ranking government official. (Kurowski 2010) It is not
known why a man with no military family connections would be led to join the army but I believe
that he was influenced by the growing Nationalism in Germany at the time. He became an officer
cadet in 1910 with the124th Wurttemberg Infantry Regiment where he was commissioned a
Leutnant in 1911. After his commission he would go on to marry Lucia Mollin on 27 November
1916, they would later have a son whom they named Manfred Rommel. It is rumored that he had a
daughter born in 1913 named Gertrud Stemmler from a relationship with Walburga Stemmer which
was before his marriage. (History.com n.d.) Who could have guessed that 33 years later he would
hold the rank of Generalfeldmarschall and be one of the most famous battlefield leaders of the
Second World War. One can only wonder about the path that led a son of a teacher from the world of
academia to the battlefields of World War I. His first unit that he fought with in WWI was the 6th
Wurttemberg Regiment but soon transferred into the Wurttemberg Mountain Battalion of the elite
Alpenkorp which was known for its adaptability which enabled the unit to meet the

The Arnolfini Wedding Portrait: Interpretations
Jan van Eyck's work, The Arnolfini Portrait, is a famous piece of Flemish portraiture with a lively
history of interpretation (Hall xviii). Most interpretations of the work hinge upon the symbolism
found in the iconography of the work, while others rely upon the presumption that the work is
nothing but masterfully rendered naturalism, while still others apply various modern art history
methodologies. In this paper I will provide a brief survey of the leading interpretations and methods
that have been applied to the Arnolfini Portrait.
One cannot review the analysis and historiography of the Arnolfini Portrait without encountering
some sort of rehearsal of Erwin Panofsky's reading of the work in his book Early Netherlandish
Painting. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before Panofsky, even the National Gallery of London, the home of the work, was uncertain as to
the subject of the portrait. Panofsky's interpretation rests in part on the inscription above the mirror
behind the couple, which says "Johannes de Eyck fuit hic," or "Jan van Eyck was here". Because of
the stylized scripts and the assertion that the artist who painted the wedding was present to it,
Panofsky and others have made the argument that the work is nothing less than a signed, notarized
wedding portrait (Farber).
Besides allegorical interpretations, some scholars have pointed to naturalism as the prime window
through which this work should be viewed. This view sees van Eyck as attempting to depict the
scene completely naturally, or in all of its total, unembellished glory. For example, Carrier quotes
Ludwig Baldass as saying of the mirror behind the couple: "The convex diminishing mirror is there
in order that the whole of the room may be seen Convex mirrors are always round, for which reason
the roundness in this case is not to be interpreted as a symbol of the world. Stated in another way,
the mirror is there to show everyone the entirety of the event, including the witnesses, leaving no
allegorical description necessary. The same naturalism

Australian History Essay
JJ Selwyn IV DJM AUH ESSAY – WORLD WAR II How significant a contribution did Australian
troops make to the course and outcome of World War II? During World War II, of the 7 million
people who lived in Australia, 550 000 served overseas in the armed forces. While this was a high
proportion of the population and they all fought bravely in battle, it still can not be said that their
efforts made a significant contribution to the course and outcome of the war. In campaigns such as
Tobruk and El Alamein in North Africa and, primarily, Papua New Guinea, the Australian troops
gave a good account of themselves and made significant contributions to the battles in each of these
areas. However, in comparison to battles in the European theatre of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While this battle was not pivotal in the course of the war, it is still extremely clear that the
Australian troops contributed greatly. The next battle, in which there was significant Australian
contribution, was in El Alamein, in the Mediterranean theatre of war. This was a battle which after
the loss of Tobruk, halted and turned around the German forces which were advancing towards
Egypt. After the battle Churchill said "Before El Alamein, we never had a victory, after El Alamein,
we never had a defeat". This campaign managed to destroy the Germans hopes of capturing Egypt.
The 1st battle of El Alamein, which included the Australian 9th division, took place between the
10th and 27th of July 1942. While Allie losses in this battle were greater than German losses, it
stopped and exhausted the Germans and forced them to regroup before they tried to advance again.
The 2nd and more decisive battle of El Alamein took place on the 23rd of October. By this time the
Allied forces had brought together an vast reserve of men, approximately 220 000 troops, of which
32 000 were Australian. Having intercepted German plans, the Allied forces, commanded by Sir
Bernard Law Montgomery, were able to anticipate the German movements and eventually defeat
them, with the battle ending on the 5th November. While the Australian troops only made up 6% of
Montgomery's forces, the suffered 20% of the casualties, with 620

The Elaborate Inheritance Of Chad Deity Essay
Kristoffer Diaz's play, The Elaborate Entrance of Chad Deity, is a play that revolves around a
character named Mace, and his career as a wrestler in "The Wrestling" league, as Diaz so refers to
the American Wrestling Association within the play. Bertolt Brecht, a theatre practitioner,
playwright, and poet, was a teenager during World War I in Nazi Germany. He was disgusted by the
world around him, as he witnessed many of his friends sent off to die in the war. Because of Brecht's
opinions on the world around him, he negatively viewed the classical form of theater, what he called
'dramatic theater', and created a new idea of theater known as 'epic theater'. I believe Kristoffer
Diaz's play, The Elaborate Entrance of Chad Deity, to be closely ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The most significant result of overinvolvement of a single character is failing to see the larger
injustices that put the character into their situation to begin with. In the play by Kristoffer Diaz, the
main injustice that is being focused on is on the inequality based on racial demographics,
specifically within the category of people of 'color'. Mace is from Mexico, and is racially profiled as
such in both his character on set and within the play itself as his wrestling character. He and VP, an
Indian character, represent two minority groups who are oppressed within America. The wrestling
presented is representative of the United States and the degradation of people of color especially
immigrants. At the end of the play, Mace opposes his boss in outrage for the greater population of
people of color who are unable to win their battles, as he is to never win a match, even in his
finishing match he is still defeated by Chad Deity. VP watching on the screen is with a woman who
asks, "why are they cheering for the bad guy?". This is an attention grabber that provokes the
audience to be called to

World War II: Erwin Rommel
The Desert Fox of WWII: Erwin Rommel
"Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, but brains saves both" (Rommel). This particular quote sums
up the military career of Erwin Johannes Rommel. His improvising of tactics led to many victories
for the Nazis in World War II, and is responsible for increasing the defenses of the French coast
before D–Day. In WWII Nazi Field Marshal Erwin Rommel planned and fought in battles in Poland,
France, and North Africa, which led to victories for the German army.
The year is 1939, and Adolf Hitler and the Nazis have invaded Poland, and Erwin Rommel has been
called from the war academy in Wiener Neustadt to Poland. After arriving, he was promoted to
Major General and given command of Hitler's bodyguard. Despite ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Italian army was taking heavy casualties from the British, and needed assistance. Back in
Berlin, Erwin Rommel had just been promoted to the rank of lieutenant general and was given
command of the Deutsches Afrika Korps. When arriving in Tripoli in February 1941, he found the
Italians with very low morale due to their retreating. "In view of the tenseness of the situation, and
the sluggishness of the Italian command, I decided to ignore my orders and take command at the
front with my own hands as soon as possible – at the very least until the arrival of the first German
units" – Rommel. Eventually, he would officially earn total command. The Afrika Korps had their
first fight with the British Forces stationed at El Agheila on February 24, and started another
successful push on the British at Mersa Brega. Rommel used the same Blitzkrieg tactics he used in
France, which caught the British off guard. They chased after the retreating British from Tripolitania
to Benghazi, which they captured. This was when Rommel was given the name "Desert Fox" by
both the Axis and Allied powers. He was called this due to his improvising and the many tricks he
pulled to outwit his enemies. It was at this time, that he had been promoted to the rank of Field
Marshal, which would make him the youngest German field marshal at that time, with him being
promoted at the age of 50. From the middle of April to the middle of June, the British attempted
offensive attacks against the Germans but were pushed back by antiaircraft 88mm flak guns being
used on tanks. Rommel had the 88mm guns dug into the ground in a U–shape. They were in so deep
that the barrels of the guns were around 30 and 60 cm off of the ground. He then had tents the same
color as their environment put over every gun, so they would appear like sand dunes. Tanks were
sent as decoys the British were supposed to follow, and they did. The British tanks neglected the
supposed "sand dunes" they saw and kept

The Field Of Marshal Erwin Rommel
Field Marshal Erwin Rommel was the only German, Italian, Japanese commander in WW2 to be
both, idolized by his men and immensely admired by his enemies. Winston Churchill the British
prime mister in WWII described him as a great general "whose ardor and daring inflicted great
disasters upon us". When he was in charge of the Afrika Korps the opposing commander had to
reassure his men that Rommel was not a "magician or superhuman." Rommel was implicated in a
plot to murder Hitler nd committed suicide. Rommel was born in Hedienham located in the
Kingdom of Wurttemberg, Germany on November 15, 1891 the son of a Bavarian schoolteacher. In
1910 Rommel joined the local " 124 Wurrtenburg Infantry Regiment as an ensign." Soon after he
enrolled in Officer School , graduating 2 years later as an lieutenant. When war was declared
Rommel returned to his old regiment. During World War I he fought in Romania and France
successfully employing "the tactics of inﬁltrating through enemy lines under cover of darkness
moving forward rapidly to a ﬂanking position to arrive at the rear, to achieve the element of
surprise." Because of Rommel's successes he was rewarded the second most prestigious German
military awarded the Iron Cross second class. In 1916 Rommel was granted a brief leave for his
Marriage to Lucia Mollin. However, Rommel's biggest successes would come in the Italian Alps in
the Battel of Carpetto in which Rommel and 150 men captured 9,000 men at the cost of 6 dead and
30

The Symbolism Of Arnolfini's Wedding
Arnolfini's Marriage
Jan van Eyck was "one of the greatest and most influential Flemish painters of altarpieces and
portraits of the 1400's" (Hayes). van Eyck's paintings often include objects with hidden symbolic
meaning. There are several different interpretations of the symbolic meaning concerning his portrait
of Giovanni Arnolfini and his second bride often referred to as "The Arnolfini Marriage". Marriage
is a sacred union between man and woman. A wedding is one of the most important events in a
woman's life. Often a wedding occurs in the present of the wedding party, family members and
friends. During the 1400's a wedding ceremony was performed in the privacy of the home. van Eyck
was hired to paint a portrait of this marriage ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Arnolfini and his bride are not wearing any shoes. This symbolizes the floor is considered holy
ground or the sanctity of marriage (Pioch). Some art historians claim the shoes do not have a
symbolic meaning. Dog were considered a symbol of devotion and love so often they were included
in portraits of a married couple. van Eyck painted the mirror as a reflection of the witnesses present
for the wedding. Which includes "van Eyck's own tiny self–portrait" (Pioch). His signature on the
painting reads "Jan van Eyck was present", this has been interpreted by some historians as an
indication that he served as a witness" (Pioch).
If the "Arnolfini's Marriage" had taken place during the 1900's it would have been very easy for an
artist to include every single detail of the wedding. Because the wedding took place during the
1400's, all we can do is assume or use our best judgment to interpret the true meaning of each
symbol in the portrait. We can all at least agree van Eyck was the artist that painted this portrait.
Then again some historians say his brother Hubert was the artist. (Kren)
Works Cited
Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. New York: Mod. Lang. Assn.,
1999.
Hayes, Rae–Anne and Klein, Amy. "Arnolfini Portrait Also Known As The Arnolfini Marriage" 13
May 2002. Kren, Emil, and Marx, Daniel. Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and his Wife" Web Gallery
of Art 13 May 2002.

Field Marshal Rommel: Success And Achievements
Field Marshal Rommel
In this report I will go over Rommel's life as well as his success and downfalls. He played a major
part in the German army of WW|| and made many tactical decision which resulted in victories.
Early life
Field Marshal Rommel was born in Heidenhiem, Germany on November 15, 1891. His mother and
father were Helene von Luz and Professor Erwin Rommel. He was educated locally and showed a
strong technical aptitude at an early age. Even though Rommel wanted to pursue engineering, his
father encouraged him to join 124th Württemberg Infantry Regiment. This meant he was sent to
Officer Cadet school in Danzig. He then graduated the next year as a lieutenant. He met his future
wife, Lucia Mollin, during his schooling. They got ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He had to withdraw back to the German bridge head in Tunis and by 1943 Hitler had ordered him
home.
Deceased
On July 17, 1944 during an invasion battle Rommel's car was attacked by British fighter bombers
and was forced off the road. Rommel was hospitalised with serious head injuries but by August he
had recovered sufficiently and returned home to convalescence.
On July 20, 1944 there was a failed attempt on Hitlers life which relieved Rommel's contact with the
conspirators. Hitler didn't want the 'people's marshal' to appear in court as an enemy and therefor
taken to the gallows.
Instead Hitler sent two generals to Rommel and offered him poison in assurance that his and is
family's name would be not be spoiled if he avoided the trial.
On October 14 Rommel took the poison, ending his life and was later buried with full military
honours.
Conclusion
In conclusion, field marshal Rommel was a widely respected man by both his enemies and friends.

He was a great success even when he failed and his skills and tactics helped Germany to gain an
advantage in specific parts in the war. He was a great friend of Hitler and an overall good

While Presenting May Be A Literal Objectification Of Slaves
While Presenting may be a literal objectification of slaves in Walker's work, this overarching
concept can also be seen in her works Untitled and Gone. In Untitled, the young woman is depicted
as naked, a common practice from slavery. During the practice, slaves were often forced to stand
nude and be inspected by potential masters, as if part of a crude, human dog show. The woman in
this picture seems vulnerable in a similar fashion, forced to stand in an apparently submissive state
to the fully clothed men and women beside her in order to have her work be considered at all by this
'high art' world. Gone's brutal caricatures particularly focus on this slave–master objectification,
primarily with slaves serving as objects of sexual ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As Steer phrases it, the "aim [of Brecht's pieces] is to promote an attitude of regional activism, an
ability to see things could be other than they are" (Steer 639).
Brecht accomplishes a desire for activism by alienating the audience from his characters, or by
trying to "free socially conditioned phenomena from that stamp of familiarity which protects them
against our grasp" (Brecht 192). The hero is more a creation of a social and political atmosphere
than a living breathing character, and is therefore viewed as an object, something inhuman. Walker's
caricatures follow this structure, ranging from the slave men and women in Gone and Practicing to
the young artist in Untitled: all of them are representations of greater ideas, yet are warped enough
in design or position that they are freed from a complete pathetic connection. A type of historical
fiction is formed, close enough for us to grasp and consider the themes presented, yet distanced
enough for the audience to feel a desire to change things, as according to Brecht.
Walker's art is therefore an entirely new genre with this Brechtian lens, serving as a form of epic art
rather than simply epic theatre or political art. Through the objectification and therefore alienation of
her subjects with regards to the audience, Walker appears to be inciting a drive towards activity, be it
a simple acknowledgment of her themes or the creation of a spark for activism. Through the
historically

Summary Of The Battle Of Stalingrad
The Battle of Stalingrad, perhaps the single most critical and certainly one of the bloodiest battles of
World War II, is a great setting for a historical fiction story. His story centers on a duel to the death
between two men: Chief Master Sgt. Vasily Zaitsev, sniper, one of the best of the Russian army, and
a German SS colonel named Heinz Thorvald, the Nazis' greatest marksman. When Russian snipers
led by Zaitsev begin to take a demoralizing toll of German troops, picking them off like hunters
shooting bears, the high command in Berlin dispatches Thorvald to the battlefield with orders to
accomplish a single task: kill Zaitsev. A deadly contest ensues, with Robbins skillfully building up
each of his protagonists as so deadly in their murderous crafts as to make them feared as a person
and well liked as a reader. It is not David versus Goliath, but Hercules versus Zeus, the manly
conflict of two equally matched and equally remorseless adversaries. The story moreover is based,
Robbins writes in the introduction, on two real historical figures, though it is unclear whether the
real Zaitsev and Thorvald engaged in the kind of duel described in "War of the Rats." Robbins opens
with a German lieutenant named Hofstetter who makes the mistake of tilting his head back to drink
from a canteen and is dropped by a single shot from a distant rifle. We then meet his killer, the
Russian Zaitsev, who, before World War II was a hunter on the Siberian taiga, instructed by his
grandfather in the almost mystical and intuition–filled techniques of stalking. ("God is about fear, a
way to make you afraid and obey," the old man told him. "The man of the forest is without fear.")
Zaitsev is called into the dirt–floored bunker of his commanding officer one day and ordered to train
a team of snipers. The reason for keeping the enemy tied down in Stalingrad, however, is easy to
know. The Germans have to be kept against the Volga River until the gigantic pincers movement
that will eventually defeat them can be mounted. Zaitsev and his partner, big Viktor Medvedev, draw
together their team of sharpshooters. This includes one beautiful woman of unusual provenance, a
certain Tania Chernova who, Robbins tells us in his introduction, was

An Army At Dawn Essay
The book An Army at Dawn: The War in North Africa 1942–1943 gives the reader valuable insight
into the campaign in North Africa in 1942–1943 for both Allied and the German forces. The
narrative follows the American and British armies as they fought the Vichy French in Morocco and
Algiers, and then later when they fight the Germans and the Italians for Tunisia. The novel follows
the inexperienced and ill–led soldiers from battle to battle as they gradually become a more cohesive
and deadly fighting force. This novel also centers around the almost mythical but also flawed
commanders who dominate the battlefield and write their names in the history books: Eisenhower,
Patton, Bradley, Montgomery, and Rommel. The author, Patrick Atkinson, lays out a spectacular
narrative on what was happening during Operation Torch and in the North African Campaign. In
analyzing the narrative, the author's main points consist of the Allies (American and British) and
German strategy/thinking during the campaign. The other main points consist of the ally defeats and
failures during the campaign which resulted in them having to re–strategize and rethink of how to
defeat the Nazi forces under the command of Generalfeldmarschall Erwin Rommel. All of this
cumulates to his important main point, which was that the Allies gained enough vital experience
from their past defeats to win the overall campaign. There are parallels and tie–ins fro this book that
correspond to the readings that we have had to do

History, Preparation, Execution, Results, And Lessons...
Introduction In February 1941, Field Marshal Erwin Rommel received command of the recently
created Afrika Korps. The unit deployed to Libya in order to support the Italian Army that had
recently suffered setbacks against the British forces. For the next two years, Rommel's forces fought
across the North African desert against British forces led by Generals Archibald Wavell, Claude
Auchinleck, and Bernard Montgomery. The culminating point for this campaign was the two battles
of El Alamein, after which the Germans retreated to Tunisia and eventually surrendered. This case
study will examine the history, preparation, execution, results, and lessons learned during the Battles
of El Alamein and how that defeat helped lead to the overall Axis defeat in World War II (WWII).
History
The fighting on the African continent began before WWII. Italy, in the late 19th century, had
colonies in Libya, Eritrea, and Somaliland (now Somalia). In 1935, Bunito Mussolini, the dictator of
Italy, wanted to have an Italian East African Empire. To accomplish this, his Italian forces conquered
Ethiopia by 1936, forming his empire consisting of Somaliland, Eritrea, and Ethiopia. The British,
meanwhile, provided soldiers for the defense of the Suez Canal in Egypt in accordance with the
Anglo–Egyptian Treaty of 1936. With Mussolini declaring war on England and France in June 1940,
Britain found itself surrounded by Italian forces.
Mussolini wanted to link the two sections of his

Operation Torch : An Objective Of Pushing Forces Into The...
In November 1942, Allied Forces launched a strategic operation (Operation Torch) to establish
presence in North Africa. The insertion of three task forces into the North African front invaded
three beaches (two west of Algiers and one east of Algiers). Operation Torch was successful;
however, General Dwight Eisenhower did not achieve the strategic objective of pushing forces into
Tunisia. By failing to do so, German and Italian forces activated reserve forces and built combat
power in Tunisia. In mid–December 1942, Germans deploy forces in northern Tunisia from Sicily
and Italy, winning the race to seize Tunis (Zaloga, 2005). General Anderson (British First Army
Commander) aimed efforts at Tunis, in late December 1942. The Allied force build up was evident
with totals ranging from over 20,000 British, nearly 12,000 Americans, and over 7,000 French
troops. Under the direction of General Fredendall, the U.S. II Corps would eventually include the
larger part of six divisions: the 1st, 3d, 9th, and 34th Infantry and elements from the 1st and 2nd
Armored divisions (Anderson, 2014). Through hasty intelligence reports, over 35,000 Axis troops
were across their line of departure, which led up to the Battle of Kasserine Pass. In late January
1943, Rommel and von Arnim receive change of mission from Italian Comando Supremo (High
Command) to maneuver against Allied positions along Fondouk and Faid Pass (approximately 50
miles east of Kasserine Pass). By 3 February, the Allied

Why Was Erwin Rommel The Main Cause Of The Second World War
Was Erwin Rommel the main cause of Germany's victories in 1941–43 in Africa.
Erwin Rommel – was a German Field Marshal, one of the most outstanding commanders of the
Second World War. The ones they usually say about: "it is a pity that he was an enemy." He was one
of the most liked by soldiers and a folk hero of Nazi Germany, and this was actively used for Nazi
propaganda. Since 1941, the figure of Rommel (or as he was called in Africa "fox of the desert")
became the most noticeable among the generals of Wehrmacht. He was the only person who had
such a stunning "jump" in the military career from Hauptmann to field marshal. His skills and
professionalism was appreciated not only by his nation, but even by his opponents and enemies.
His leadership ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He pushed the British 8th Army to the east, it was greatly worn in Battle of Gazala, forcing
Auchinleck(the British commander) to retreat to El Alamein positions on the border with Egypt.
Auchinleck was soon changed on Bernard Montgomery and also the changes brought Britain total
overweight in troops and new machinery in Africa. On October 23, 1942, when Rommel was in
Germany for the reason of sickness, Montgomery started massive artillery bombardment which
eventually finished as the Second Battle of El Alamein. Rommel immediately returned to North
Africa, but could not help and stop break of the British which followed after a week of constant
pressure by British infantry and tanks. On 4th of November he ordered to all of his people to retreat.
Despite the eventual loss Rommel was a national hero for Nazi Germany. "Anybody who came
under the spell of his personality turned into a real soldier. He seemed to know what the enemy were
like and how they would react. "(Theodor Werner) This is a quote from one of the officers who
served with the Desert Fox about Rommel. After the fail of anti–Hitler's coup in 1944, one of its
members, dying in tortures, named Rommel, and that determined the future of the great commander.
On October 14th, Hitler sent to Rommel who was recovering from the wound two officers, giving
him in honor of past services a choice – to commit a suicide and leave as a hero or a to be brought
before a Public Tribunal, which in face meant an automatic death sentence . " I shall be dead in a
quarter of an hour "( "The Forced Suicide of Field Marshall Rommel, 1944) – said the brave man
and his wife took poison. Yet Rommel, as well as other Nazi generals, carries the share of
responsibility for the world tragedy. He remained loyal to Hitler, because, being in full confidence
that fulfills his military duty, took no notice of non–military consequences of Naxi activities. In this
self–deception lies the tragedy

D-Day : Turning Point Of WWII
D–Day: Turning Point of WWII
D–Day, June 6, 1944, is one of the most memorable days in history. It was the day that more than
160,000 Allied Troops were ordered to storm the beaches of Normandy, France, in order to push the
German defenses back and to take the beaches, and most importantly to open a second front on the
European coast, which Stalin had been pushing for years to no avail. "Germany intended to hold
Italy". (History Today 3). While soldiers stormed the beaches, thousands of allied Forces were
dropped behind German lines to take important roads and bridges in order to prevent German
reinforcements from getting to the beaches quicker. Throughout the Slaughter from troops on both
sides, the Nazi forces were pushed back and the beaches along the coast of Normandy were taken
back into friendly control. D–day has been known as the day that marked the "Beginning of the end
for Adolf Hitler".
Operation Overlord (D–Day), the invasion of Normandy was a very intense and bloody day for all
allies included in this battle. Forces from the United Kingdom, Canada and France made up a
majority of the main forces alongside the United States, also with participants from around the
world. For the forces of France, this battle would prove to be very emotional as it was an effort for
trying to take back their homeland. General Eisenhower, commander of this mission had a hoped
that having Germany attacked on two sides would expend their forces and allow the war to be won

Killing Rommel Book Report
Killing Rommel Killing Rommel by Steven Pressfield tells the story about an elite British
commando unit, the Long Range Desert Group, and their mission to roam the North African desert.
The mission was to stop Field Marshal Erwin Rommel and his Afrika Corps during World War II.
Rommel, also known as the "Desert Fox", was a German army general that Hitler could rely on for
almost any mission given his exceptional tactics on the battlefield. Pressfield presents the story as a
first person account memoir of a fictional citizen–soldier who goes by Lieutenant Lawrence
Chapman, a British Eighth Army officer. Chapman is later selected to be a part of the Long Range
Desert Group (LRDG) in 1942. Pressfield states how he did his best not to alter ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
One fact that stood out to me was early on in the book when he described the heat situation inside of
an army tank and said, "For every degree–Fahrenheit rise outside, interior temperature rose a degree
and a half. Seventy out was 100 in..." (16). This is astonishing to me that the troops were in the
desert with 100 degree weather and roasting in their tanks at 130 degrees. The novel flows nicely,
beginning with how Chapman describing his journey to the LRDG. It unravels the mission, he and
his comrades were ordered to do in the heat of World War II. There is no doubt that Pressfield
wanted to keep the story in first person to account for the events in Chap's memoir. He states in the
prologue that it was in his best interest to keep as much as he could directly as Chap wrote while
making it as easy to read as possible. This book is a work of fiction, but it incorporates many facts
and real people. I think he did a fantastic job. There is a few confusing spots throughout the book
when it gets into the technical stuff. One example is trying to keep track of all the different army
divisions. There was never a time I was bored reading which is why I would recommend the

The Arnolfini Wedding
Do you wonder what "The Arnolfini Wedding" is? I looked at different views of this painting. In the
end I found interesting things about this oil painting. This painting will show many different forms
of viewing it. Also, it will show what the artist was thinking, and why he was thinking it. I will go
into detail about how oil painting came to be a form of art and why the artist showed this in his
paintings.
When thinking about art people think it's only about paintings with normal colors and paints. Well,
they would be wrong. not only are there several different types of art but also different types of
paintings. Today I will show you the light into the world of Oil Paintings. Oil painting is the process
of painting with pigments with a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Arnolfini Wedding by Jan van Eyck caught my eye the very first time I saw it and it's hard to
take my eyes off of it. Some history behind it. A lot of people call the Arnolfini Wedding oil painting
the most Easter Egg–y painting. People believe that this oil painting shows an Italian merchant with
his wife. Is this what it really shows or is there something else hiding in the painting. With Arnolfini
wearing one of the "pimpest" hats in the history of pimping which is very hard to capture. Looking
at this painting it is easy to dismiss this the portrait. Saying it is only another piece of old art which
features dead rich people. When you look into the mirror it appears that two people are standing in
the room in front of the Aenolfinis. One of them allegedly to be a self–portrait of van Eyck. So,
when you look at a piece of art you should look at it a second time. Look to see if there is meaning
behind the painting. In such instance look past the people and look at the small details you will see
the meaning behind the picture. The artist wanted people to look deep into the painting to find the
meaning. Many people think that Jon van Eyck used a magnifying glass to paint small details in the
mirror. Therefore they call it an Easter egg. unless you look close enough at the picture most people
can't see these details. He had created one of the first Easter Eggs in art

Which Art Historical Method I Would Use: The Ideas of...
As an aspiring art historian who has been exposed to a variety of diverse methods for analyzing art,
there are two techniques in particular that stand prominent amidst the others: the ideas of Erwin
Panofsky and Adrian Piper. It is not invalid to say that both art historians share a similar view of
interpreting works of art, however, they also manage to complement one another perfectly. An
integration of both Piper and Panofsky's points of view would result in an impeccable approach to
delving into the minds of the artists and determining the significance of the works of art that they
constructed. Erwin Panofsky introduced and labeled a tripartite structure of analyzing art; he argued
that practicing this tripartite method would produce ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By immersing oneself in material of the period, one is then able to recognize and trace connections,
therefore revealing the intrinsic meaning of the painting. Defending Erwin Panofsky's method to
those who have doubts seems as though it should be nonsensical, because it is clearly the path that
art historians must take. One simply cannot eliminate his method while simultaneously retaining the
title of art historian. The omission of Panofsky's ideas transforms art history into art appreciation.
By use of what other method should one endeavor to find the meaning of a work of art if not
through the art's contemporary documents and artifacts? We cannot afford to ignore the clues that
may provide us with an idea of the culture that surrounded the work of art–they are all we have.
While approaching artifacts as a tool to explain the past to us, there will always be doubts of
accuracy, however, until someone develops time travel, said artifacts are the most solid evidence in
our possession. The moment we stop attempting to reveal what the artist was saying is the moment
we do ourselves, as well as these great artists, a tremendous disservice. In Adrian

Countdown To D-Day Essay
Abstract
In the 2004 movie, Ike: Countdown to D–Day, a profile of the leadership style of General Dwight D.
Eisenhower is presented as planning and preparation for the single greatest invasion in the history of
the world is engaged. This paper examines the leadership style and qualities of the Supreme Allied
Commander as presented in the movie and in other literary references.
Management in the Cinema – Activity 2 Paper
Introduction
Dwight D. Eisenhower was appointed to be the Supreme Allied Commander, directing a force of
over 1 million men in an operation designed to liberate Europe from Germany's control. He was
selected for his management style as evidenced by his organizational skills, his political skills and
his personal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Patton and Montgomery were nearly uncontrollable and self–aggrandizing. But both were brilliant
in the field. Eisenhower had to find a way to win their cooperation in spite of the fact that neither
would be allowed to run the overall operation as they wanted. Patton was given an almost insulting
yet critical role of being the diversion that kept Hitler's eyes off the western beaches. (Later, he
would be given control of US ground troops, a role he coveted almost as much as Montgomery's
role.) Montgomery's constant, vocal advocation of a "spear–thrust" through France to Berlin had to
be sidelined in order to prevent the Allies from making the same mistake in Europe that Hitler was
making in Russia, i.e. extending the troops too far away from their support troops and supply lines.
Managing these egos was a monumental task, and there weren't many who could manage it as
adeptly as Eisenhower did.
Do you think the decision to have a Supreme Allied Commander was the right managerial structure
since it was a highly centralized command structure or would there have been another command
structure you would have taken with more participative management?
The question implies that Eisenhower did not have a participative management style. Most
historians would seem to disagree (Johnson, 2006, p. 2). The purpose of having a Supreme Allied
Commander was not to elevate one person due to his talent

The German General Erwin Rommel
The German General Erwin Rommel is an iconic figure of Adolf Hitler's Nazi regime whom during
his career followed the principle of fighting battles only on the condition of gaining from winning.
Respected by both the Allied and Axis powers, his approach to warfare was cunning and humane,
making him particularly significant in a time of oppression and malevolence. Thus, Rommel
performed his duties with dignity and respect toward all soldiers alike and accordingly won the
admiration and legend still alive in modern times. In addition, Rommel's charism on the battlefield
and natural gift of leadership lead him beyond all expectations of superiors. Consequently, Rommel
was frequently featured in propaganda as an exceptional German General and ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The Battle of Caporetto is a fine example of such an instance where Rommel captured not only three
tactical mountains, but 9,000 Italian soldiers including 150 officers with only a limited supply of
men using only sheer wit and determination under direct orders to do otherwise. Sullivan branded
the battle as the "Greatest defeat in Italian military history." Between wars, Rommel shared his
expertise to military academies with his novel "Infanterie Greift", which allowed him to become
personally acquainted to Adolf Hitler and later earning himself the position of commander of
Hitler's own personal security in Poland, 1939. Rommel speaks of the importance of respect from a
commander's men in his novel, "Winning the men 's confidence requires much of a commander...
But once he has their confidence, his men will follow him through hell and high water." Rommel's
proficiency caught the admiration of Hitler whom granted him control of the 7th Panzer division in
France, 1940. It was as a Panzer Commander that Rommel was able to fully utilise his strength in
the element of surprise by employing the infamous 'Blitzkrieg' tactic which featured in the invasion
of various European countries. The soldiers of the 7th Panzer Division noticed Rommel's
couragousness early, Glanz comments, "Rommel lead from the front... the ideal military
commander." Furthermore,

Non Aristotelian Drama Essay
The twenty–first century is developing into a time of technological developments and the beginning
of the Modern Era. The early Modern Era was known as a time of exploration and globalization.
Globalization is the interconnection of countries; there is an active exchange of commodities, ideas,
and philosophical thoughts. With the development in technology such as cell phones, airplanes,
Internet, and social media; it has made the growth of transportation and communication networks
possible and much more advanced. In other words, people and countries can exchange information,
ideas, and goods more quickly and efficiently. The worldwide spread of technology creates vast
connections that create new opportunities on a larger scale. One philosophical movement that spread
quickly was Modernism. Modernism is a philosophical movement in the arts. The modernists
rejected traditional notions of plot and time. In contrast, they would show a rational, cause–effect
relationship between events and the character's development. In this essay I will be demonstrating
one of Berolt Brecht "non–Aristotelian drama", a dramatic form intended to be staged with the
methods of epic theatre.
Berolt Brecht was one of most prominent modernists during this era. He proposed the idea of the
Epic Theater. In 1924, after moving to Berlin, Brecht started to work with Erwin Piscator. Piscator
was known for practicing forms of political and social epic theater. After working with Piscator for
some time,

Erwin Rommel Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Diana Oliva

More from Diana Oliva (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Erwin Rommel Essay