The document outlines the requirements for Ana Marielle L. Formalejo's field study evaluation in her BSED-Eng III-1 course. It includes her targets, a rubric for evaluating her performance, templates for observation, analysis, reflection, and portfolio. Her target is to determine the teaching approach or method used by her resource teacher, Mrs. Sherla Pereña, at Taguig National High School. She must observe a class, identify the approach used, answer analysis questions, reflect on her experience, and submit a portfolio before the deadline to receive a grade.

1. Name of FS Student Formalejo, Ana Marielle L.
Course, Year & Section BSED-Eng III-1
Resource Teacher Mrs. Sherla Pereña Signature Date
Cooperating School Taguig National High School
My Target
In this Episode, I must be able to determine the teaching
approach or method used by the Resource Teacher.
Episode 5
On teaching approaches and methods

2. My Performance (How I Will Be Rated)
Field Study 2 Episode 5– On Teaching Approaches and Methods
Focused on: Determining the teaching approach or methodused by the Resource Teacher
Tasks
Exemplary
4
Superior
3
Satisfactory
2
Unsatisfactory
1
Observation/
Documentation
All tasks were done
with outstanding
quality; work
exceeds
expectations.
4
All or nearly all
tasks were done
with high quality
3
Nearly all tasks
were done with
acceptable quality
2
Fewer than
half of tasks
were done; or
most
objectives met
but with poor
quality
1
My Analysis
Analysis question
were answered
completely; in depth
answers; thoroughly
grounded on
theories
Exemplary grammar
and spelling
4
Analysis questions
were answered
completely
Clear connection
with theories
Grammar and
spelling are
superior.
3
Analysis questions
were not answered
completely.
Vaguely related to
the theories
Grammar and
spelling
acceptable.
2
Analysis
questions were
not answered.
Grammar and
spelling
Unsatisfactory
1
My Reflection
Reflection
statements are
profound and clear,
supported by
experiences from the
episode.
4
Reflection
statements are
clear, but not
clearly supported
by experiences
from the episode.
3
Reflection
statements are
Shallow; supported
by experiences
from the episode.
2
Reflection
statements are
unclear and
shallow and
are not
supported by
experiences
from the
episode.
1

3. My Portfolio
Portfolio is complete,
clear well-organized
and all supporting
documentation are
located in sections
clearly designated
4
Portfolio is
complete, clear
well - organized
and most
supporting
documentation
are available
and/or in logical
and clearly
marked locations.
3
Portfolio is
incomplete;
supporting
documentation is
organized but is
lacking.
2
Portfolio has
many lacking
components; is
unorganized
and unclear.
1
Submission
Before deadline
4
On the deadline
3
A day after the
deadline
2
Two days or
more after the
deadline
1
Sub Totals
Over-all Score
Rating :
(Based on Transmutation)
Dr. Kent Gamboa
Signature of the FS Teacher
Above Printed Name
Date
Transmutation of Score to Grade or Rating
Score Grade Score Grade
20 1.00 (99) 12 – 13 2.50 (81)
18 – 19 1.25 (96) 11 2.75 (78)
17 1.50 (93) 10 3.00 (75)
16 1.75 (90) 8 – 9 4.00 (72)
15 2.00 (87) 7 5.00 (71 and below)
14 2.25 (84)

4. My Tool
As I observe a class, I will use the Observation Sheet for a more focused observation.
OBSERVATION SHEET
Name of the Resource Teacher Observed: Mrs. Sherla Pereña
Cooperating School: Taguig National High School Date:
Grade/ Year Level: Grade 7 Subject Area: English
Approach/ Method
Description of Teaching Behavior that
Proves Use of the Teaching Approach/
Method (What did my Resource
Teacher do as she used this approach/
method?)
1. Deductive Method
2. Inductive Method
3. Demonstration Method

5. 4. Problem Solving
5. Discover Method
6. Problem Solving Method
7. Project Method .
8. Constructivist Approach
9. Metacognitive Approach.
10. Integrative Approach

6. My Analysis
I will answer the following questions:
1. Which approaches / methods will be grouped together? e.g. Direct
method and deductive method
2. Which approaches / methods are more interactive? Less interactive?
3. When should the direct method be used?
4. When should the direct method be used?
5. Which approaches/ methods promote “learning to live together”?

7. My Reflections
If I decide on my teaching approach/ method, I will consider
___________________________ (Continue the sentence. Begin writing NOW!)

8. My Portfolio
1. By means of a graphic organizer show the characteristics of a
constructivist and a metacognitive approach.
Constructivist
Approach
Metacognitive
Approach

9. 2. Do serious research and complete this Table on Methods. The first is done
for you.
Method Advantage/s When to Use
1. Deductive
Direct teaching so I can
accomplish more within
a given period of time.
Time is limited; subject
matter is very difficult;
learners don’t know
much about the lesson;
teacher is not yet skilled
in facilitating skills.