Egoism Vs Egoism

Egoism Vs Egoism
What motivates individuals to do the things they do well, it is based fundamentally on their morality.
Our moralities are the actions and beliefs we consider to be right or wrong. Our
everydaydecisionsare determined by these morals. Moralityrefers to a code of conduct that applies
to all who can understand it and can govern their behavior by it(Gert).An individuals morality is
shaped by the way they view his or her own interests and weigh it in comparison to the interests of
others. Those that value their own interests over others are known as egoist. Egoism is an ethical
theory that treats self–interest as the foundation of morality.However, egoism is divided into two,one
known as ethical egoism and the other is psychological egoism. The two revolve around the idea of
self–interest. These types of egoist value their own interests over others. However, many of people
have egotistic interior motives as helping others in the interest of our own.Humankind has the
natural tendencies to grow, develop, and be the best they can be is in respect to their interests. After
an individual discovers his or her own interests they learn what it takes to succeed and satisfy their
interests. Maslow defines human tendencyisto strive for growth, autonomy, identity and the
excellence of self–actualization(Abraham Maslow). Individuals instinctively strive to become better
based on their interests. Therefore, as individuals, we naturally wish to excel or be exceptional, to be
noticed for our
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Pros And Cons Of Egoism
Egoism is the theory that one ought to do what is in one's self interest. One is to maximize their own
self–interest and potential. One cannot prosper if they contain their own interests and needs in order
to satisfy the interests of others. Once morality is obtained by one protecting their personal interests
and content with it, then they are able to satisfy the interests of others. Egoism is similar to that
anything that would aid in survival is good and anything that hampers survival is evil. There are two
types of egoism, psychological or descriptive egoism and ethical or normative egoism.
Psychological egoism is that humans are only driven by self–interest. For example if one were to
help another human being, the sole reason is because the individual directly or indirectly benefits
from this experience. Ethical egoism is that it is significant and acceptable for an action to be
morally ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thomas Hobbes argues that egoism is valid through a sense of morality and that an individual will
end up being altruistic through his views of egoism. Ayn Rand another famous philosopher states
that one can only be either altruistic or egoistic. One cannot be both. Ayn Rand believes an
individual has value and that the only philosophy that states that an individual has self–worth is
egoism. Ethical egoism is often based off the fact that psychological egoism is true and this entails
that we always act egotistically and cannot prevent ourselves from acting this way. An example of
this would be if one were to donate to a charity that helps little kids. In terms of psychological
egoism the individual didn't donate money to the charity to help kids, that would altruistic, one did it
because one wanted to. Another reason to why

Ethical Egoism vs Deontological Egoism
3) Can Deontological Egoism avoid all the problems that confront unconstrained ethical egoism? In
this essay I will argue that Deontological Egoism can rescue Unconstrained Ethical Egoism from a
large number of its problems and that DE offers a more plausible and attractive Egoism theory
Understanding Moral theories The goal of a moral theory is to meet certain moral principles.
Various principles are argued for to be included as moral principles within a workable moral theory.
We therefore can analyze the specific moral theories of Ethical Egoism and Deontological Egoism
which fall under the umbrella of the Egoism class of theories and see if they take into account
certain moral principles that are important in order for a theory to be ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Valuing the interests of one group or oneself over another group or others without reason to justify
these differences in treatment is arbitrary. Why should the interests of others matter to me? Moral
views exist in the world that place people into groups, racism, anti–
semitism, sexism, and nationalism. According to these views one group is deemed better or more
worthy than another. People might feel that belonging to one ethnic group, race or country makes
them more superior than another group. Racists for example like to argue that they are more superior
to blacks , and that blacks are stupid, lazy and crazy. In order to feel superior or to warrant taking
more rights and benefits for oneself a racist will argue that differences indeed exist between him and
the blacks and that these differences advocate different treatment. We know that these implied
differences are not actually true. If all relevant things are equal there is no reason to treat one better
or worse than another. Ethical egoists are guilty of discriminating on arbitrary grounds (race,
ethnicity, gender) Ethical egoism is similar in that we are told to value ourselves more than others
and we then divide the world up into two groups, oneself and the rest of the world. My interests
(even wants for trivial interests like luxuries) are

Ethical Egoism: Two Types Of Egoism
Egoism states "...one's self is, or should be, the motivation and the goal of one's own action
(Moseley, N/A)." Egoistic theory states that everyone should want to act for the desired outcome of
the self. There are two types of egoism: ethical and psychological (Kirkwood, 2016). Psychological
egoism states we act in ways that are wrong, even though we know it is wrong, for our own selfish
needs (Kirkwood 2016). In contrast, ethical egoism states that we should act in a certain way to
benefit ourselves (Kirkwood 2016). Ethical egoism is best suited to explain why it is "just" for
physicians to assist patient suicide; because it is financially beneficial for both the family and tax
payers. Any Rand, an ethical egoist stated, "[e]veryone should ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Deontological ethics holds that at least some acts are morally obligatory regardless of their
consequences for human welfare (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2016)." This theory focuses not on what
happens as a result of the decision, but the virtue of the decision itself (Encyclopedia Britannica,
2016). Immanuel Kant, a well distinguished deontologist, believed the "... fundamental principle of
morality, [is] the categorical imperative (Glannon, 2005)." He believes that humans have the
capacity to act with reason and their emotions do not play a role in the decision making process of
what is moral and what is immoral (Glannon, 2005). Additionally, deontology contains six specific
principles, relating to morality (Kirkwood 2016). These six principles include: autonomy,
impossibility, equality/justice, beneficence, and non–Malfeasance (Kirkwood 2016). However, in
the medical profession, these are grouped into four principles: autonomy, beneficence, non–
malfesceance, and justice (Kirkwood 2016). These four principles of the deontological theory
accurately justify physician assisted suicide. Specifically, physicians should participate in assisted
suicide to allow patient autonomy, and to comply with the other three deontological principles.
Autonomy is defined as a "...variously rendered ... self–law, self–government, self–rule, or self–
determination (Piper, N/A)." As a physician, it is one's duty to allow the patient to make their own
decisions. Even in scenarios in which the physician does not necessarily agree with what the patient
has decided (Kirkwood 2016). Evidence shows that in the last stages of life, 63% of patients feel a
decline in sense of self, while 60% desire some kind of control in life (Pearlman, 2004). It is at these
times, that a patient usually decides to go through with physician assisted suicide. Hence,
completely

Psychological Theories Of Psychological Egoism
Do people really perform actions out of the sincere concern for others or are there always hidden
agendas that are egoistically driven? This dissertation will take a closer look at these questions while
exploring the views of psychological egotism and what its supporters believe drives us to act in
certain ways. Although psychological egoism has not been attributed to many philosophers, it brings
forth an interesting debatable point of view of human behavior. While psychological egoism is
unquestionably a perceived theory, there hasn't always been a substantial amount of experimental
data that relates to the debate. However, there has been a good amount of empirical work that started
in the late 20th century pertaining to the study of psychological egoism. There has since been
evidence from biology, neuroscience, and psychology that has inspired interdisciplinary discussions.
Psychological Egoism is an absolutist theory advocating that human being's actions are ultimately
motivated by their own self–benefit and self–fulfillment. In other words, the belief is that there is
always an ulterior motive to any behavior one performs for another making such acts beneficial to
the performer in one way or another. One argument for psychological egoism suggests that people
just do what makes them feel good, thereby making all acts selfish. By taking a more in depth view
into all aspects of psychological egoism, one can have a better insight and understanding of why
someone may favor

Feinberg Psychological Egoism Summary
In "Psychological Egoism", Feinberg responds to argument 4b with examples. In this paper I restate
that argument and present how he argues against it. The argument Feinberg tries to refute is that:
when one satisfies his desire he would gain pleasure, thus for everyone the real motive of every
action is to achieve his own happiness and anything else he is pursuing is just an approach toward
his pleasure. At first, he attacks the premise as not rigorously being true since achieving what one
wants does not necessarily lead to satisfaction. On the contrary, most of the time no pleasure is
achieved or dissatisfaction might appear after fulfillment of goals. Secondly he argues against the
conclusion derived from the premise by claiming that even

Emmett Barcalow Moral Egoism Analysis
Capitalism is more than an economic system–it is, in many ways, a philosophical view of life, a
belief in how people should act and how the world should be. Capitalism even spills over into
ethical decisions, based on a theory called Moral Egoism. Emmett Barcalow introduces the concept
of Moral Egoism in chapter four of the third edition of his textbook, Moral Philosophy, on page 71.
He describes Moral Egoism as the belief that one should make moral decisions based on one's own
self–interest. Moral Egoism allows for behavior as genuinely helpful and benign as eating well and
staying fit–since you would do this to boost your personal health, which is in your self–interest–and
as sinister as lying, cheating, stealing, and even murdering–since

Psychological vs Ethical Egoism Essay
Psychological Egoism and Ethical Egoism: A Comparison
Abstract
There is a certain innate desire to help others, just as others will feel that same fulfillment for
returning that aid. At the same time, however, there is also an inherent yearning to seek out one's
own best interest. This brings about a discussion regarding the difference between psychological
egoism and ethical egoism. To understand the similarities and differences, one must first understand
the two concepts including their natures, as well as their doctrines of motivation.
Psychological Egoism and Ethical Egoism: A Comparison
Human beings place great value on the interests of both themselves and others. There is a certain
innate desire to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
70) . Behind every action that a person makes is an underlying question about what that person will
get out of the action. According to Rachels, however, this remains an issue of human psychology as
opposed to being one of ethics. That being said, psychological egoism does have serious costs for
human morality. Should psychological egoism actually be correct, then it would mean that all of
society is composed of selfish individuals who care only for their own gain; it would therefore be
fruitless to discuss what people should be doing. On the other hand, ethical egoism is a theory that
prescribes moral obligation, where all people should be motivated out of self interest (Rachels,
2003, p. 70). This means that every person ought to act in a way that is best for him/herself. Ethical
egoism claims that it is moral for all of an individual's actions to be based on self–interest, without
concerning him/herself with the interests of others. In fact, this thought may be continued by stating
that altruism is, therefore, personally hindering and even demeaning (Brink, 1997, p. 122). Hence,
ethical egoism must consequently mean that actions taken in an individual's self–interest are moral
actions, and actions taken that are not self–beneficial to an individual are immoral and should, as a
result, be avoided. Ethical egoism is typically broken down into two categories: strong and weak.
The strong version of ethical egoism centers on the idea that it

Egoism In Anthem By Ayn Rand
Egoist; A self–centered or selfish person. This term is mistaken for being narcissistic and wrong.
Self–motivation and individuality should never be seen as a bad thing. There is a difference between
bragging and being an egoist. Bragging is rubbing one's pride in another's face and Egoism is being
proud of oneself. Egoism is seen as self obsession in today's society, when the reality is it promotes
difference and self–motivation.
The novel Anthem is all about a collectivist society. Equality 7–2521 breaks outside of the
collectivist barriers and starts to think and do things for himself. He discovers living without
individuality is not really living, it's controlling one's life. In this society, no one knows anything
about egoism or does anything for themselves. "We are nothing. Mankind is all. By the grace of our
brothers are we allowed our lives. We exist through, by and for our brothers who are the State.
Amen." (pg. 21) This quote is the exact opposite of egoism, it states mankind lives for each other
and not for themselves. Towards the end of the book, Equality 7–2521 leaves the town and moves to
the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask none to live for me, nor do I
live for any others. I covet no man's soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet." (pg. 96) In this quote,
Equality 7–2521 had just learned the word "I" and realized that from this point on he could do
whatever he wanted with his life and do it for himself. Always doing things for others is not healthy.
It is important to be confident and proud. In a collectivist society, everyone is the same and no one
thinks outside of the box or creates new ideas. Differences are what sprout new ideas and make a
nation grow and you can not do that without individuality. Many things seem selfish even if they
aren't intended to be and that's normal. Egoists are not trying to hurt others or brag, they are just

Egoism In Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead
Egoism. In many occasions in today's world, egoism is frowned upon. However, to Prometheus in
Ayn Rand's Anthem, the word "ego" is holy. Although egoism is not approved of in the society we
live in, it is not an unacceptable doing for Prometheus to call "holy." Howard Roark, one of Ayn
Rand's characters in The Fountainhead, voiced similar opinions in his speech, The Soul of an
Individualist. Egoism is simply valuing one's own work and ideas, so Prometheus is certainly and
egoist, but egoism can be great in moderation. According to Howard Roark's speech, The Soul of an
Individualist, "To think, to feel, to judge, to act are functions of the ego." This quote shows that ego
is an integral part of being human, because all people, individuals or collectivists, think, feel, judge,
and act. Roark also stated that, "The first right on earth is the right of ego." Therefore, if one is ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When egoism is too strong, the person who is so egotistical can become rude, arrogant, and
pompous. This can happen because the egoist can become so engrossed in his/her own work and
achievements that he/she doesn't recognize or acknowledge that of others. However, in moderation,
egoism can be fantastically useful for thinking about and developing new things. In Roark's speech,
The Soul of an Individualist, Roark states that "No creator was prompted by a desire to serve his
brothers, for his brothers rejected the gift he offered and that gift destroyed the slothful routine of
their lives. His truth was his only motive." Because the creator's truth was his only motive, he was
only fueled to create by his own ego and his pride in what he could conceive on his own. Without
his ego, the creator would have no desire to create. Although harsh egoism can be harmful, moderate
egoism can work wonders. As Roark states, ". . . the mind is an attribute of the individual. There is
no such thing as a collective

Egoism Vs Altruism
Egoism and Altruism are two ideas widely known in philosophy as two opposing ideas based on the
actions of individuals. Egoists believe that act for their own self interest. Altruists believe that
individuals act for the welfare of others. These two ideas highlight the differences between two
extreme natures. People by nature are egoists. This will be proven by exploring philosophers such as
Ayn Rand, Thomas Hobbes, Henry Sidgwick and their theories on egoism involving rational and
ethical egoism. Additionally, it will be proven using philosophers such as Derek Parfit and Jean
Jacques Rosseau who criticize these ideas, but are ultimately wrong.
There has been much controversy around the ideas of egoism and altruism as many philosophers
have

The Theory Of Egoism And Altruism
In this paper I will argue that selecting only one form of egoism is not enough to explain human
motives and that it takes a mix of several theories to explain it, specifically a mix of ethical egoism
and altruism, with the side note that intent is not important in this situation. The mix is important, as
any one theory seemingly fails to encapsulate the scope of human interactions. Pure ethical egoism,
the idea that each person should only try to help themselves, makes people out to be too greedy and
seemingly unwilling to help anyone at any point in their lives. Pure altruism, the idea that people
should use their abilities and advantages to exclusively help others, makes people too willing to
sacrifice what they have for someone else. If people were completely altruistic nothing would ever
be accomplished and eventually those advantages would become erased as people stop working to
better themselves. I also believe that the intent of the action is not important so the morality of the
action should be directly tied to the outcome, not the thought process of the person doing the action.
All of these ideas will be explained in more detail later in the paper. This paper will look at each of
these three factors individually, show why they are insufficient for explaining human motives on
their own and then explain how they can all work in conjunction to better explain human motives.
This paper will then go on to show how someone might disagree with this thesis by providing some

Examples Of Psychological Egoism Argument
Number one and two above are the premises of the argument. Number three states the conclusion of
the psychological egoism argument. These premises are shown to support and represent a good
argument. There are examples that support these premises. Premise one says, whenever a person
performs an action, she is doing what she most wants to do. One example that supports premise
number one is that whenever a business owner donates money to charity, this what the owner wants
to do the most because the charity is for a good cause. This example supports the premise because
the person is performing an action that they most want to do to avoid paying extra business taxes at
the end of each year. Another example to help support premise one is that whenever

Psychological Egoism
Psychological egoism is the view that everyone always acts selfishly. It describes human nature as
being wholly self–centered and self–motivated. Psychological egoism is different from ethical
egoism in their "direction of fit" to the world. Psychological ego–ism is a factual theory. It aims to
fit the world. In the world is not how psychological ego–ism says it is because someone acts
unselfishly, then something is wrong with psycho–logical egoism. In my opinion this argument is
completely wrong and unsound. According to James Rachel, an author of "Elements of Moral
Philosophy," there two main arguments exist against psychological egoism. The first argument can
be formulated as such:
1) Everyone always does what they most want to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rachels p. 74) One can conclude from this that it is the object of the want that should be considered
when determining the selfishness of an act. The second argument for psychological egoism is
formulated like this:
1) Everyone always does what they most want to do.
2) If are does what one wants to do, ones gets satisfaction.
3) If one gets satisfaction from doing what they want to do, then satisfaction is one's only goal
4) If satisfaction is one's only goal, one acts selfishly.
5) Everyone always acts selfishly. The major criticism of this argument lays in premise three, its
"factual premise" as James Rachel calls it in his book. Opponents of this argument and Rachel being
one of them, imply that it is wrong to say that satisfaction is one's only goal because satisfaction
doesn't even have to be a goal. Satisfaction is the presumable state that results from ob–taining a
goal. Thus premise three is wrong. One can say that you can make satisfaction your goal if you will
feel bad if you don't do something, but this is not always the case. Satisfaction can result from
something else. And it is also incorrect to say that one makes satisfaction his goal then chooses his
desires to fulfill the satisfaction. (J. Rachels p. 82) The second criticism is in premise four. Rachels
proposes to change the premise, making it less problematic by saying that satisfaction is "ones'
primary goal" instead of "one's only goal."

Philosophy Of Egoism
In philosophy, egoism is the theory that one's self is, or should be, the motivation and the goals of
one's own action (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). In other words, people will act for their best
interests rather than their employer's organizational goals. Western Culture is an individualistic one,
where people work for the "I" instead of the "we". Using this reasoning, how is it possible to
develop highly engaged workgroups whose goals are aligned with the mission of their organization?
This I one of the questions TWK must answer for its future success. In day five of the temps story,
Sarah number two makes the general view that all work is meaningless even through people were
busy and this was a social failure. Her quote sums the situation perfectly "Everyone was busy, but
no one was actually doing anything meaningful. Yes you were busy all day, but so what?" This quote
alone shows there is a culture at the workplace where the employees do not gain ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This problem can be easily overlooked many employees are focused at the immediate task and are
not aware how their actions contribute to the organization as a whole. This results in employees not
having a set goals or goals aligned with the organization's goals. By not having an understanding
these goals employees are disengaged because they feel their work does not contribute to anything
significant other than the immediate goals at hand. If these goals are not understood to the
workforce it becomes increasingly difficult to improve the performance of individuals to the
manager's perspective (business salary). Keeping well preforming employees are vital to the success
of any company. Making people feel disposable significantly alters their performance. Employees
who are likely to outperform but will leave when more desirable opportunities that open up,
resulting in a weak talent bench with unfilled

Ethical Egoism Essay
"People act for many reasons; but for whom, or what, do or should they act–for themselves, for God,
or for the good of the planet?" (Moseley) An egoist would argue that one acts for one's own self.
More specifically, an ethical egoist is one who thrives to improve ones own self being, with much
respect to morality. Ethical Egoism is the theory that one should pursue his or her own interest
above all the rest. It is the idea that all persons should act from their own self interest in relation to
morality.
There are many different types of ethical egoism: Personal ethical egoism, Individual ethical
egoism, Universal ethical egoism, Categorical egoism, and Hypothetical egoism. Personal ethical
egoism is the belief that one should act for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That is their essential ethical principle. Finally, there is the hypothetical egoist, who argues that all
individuals ought to pursue their own interests if they are looking for coming to a specific end. In a
way, that type of egoist is not an actual egoist; he is rather a utilitarian who believes that happiness
for all can be enhanced if each person looks out after his own self.
A true ethical egoist would argue against the hypothetical egoist. He would not look to increase the
happiness of others, only that of himself. A true ethical egoist must not become a hypothetical
egoist, because then he is no longer an egoist. Nor should he become an individual egoist, because it
would not be ethical. In addition, the truest ethical egoist must not publicize, or even try to persuade,
others of his own policy. When an individual advocates his own doctrine upon others, he is then
persuading them to do the same. Hence, each person would begin to pursue his or her own interest
and thus it would not be to the persuader's advantage, for it will harm his own interest. A true ethical
egoist would convince people to do otherwise, and in return, this will serve the individual's greatest
interests.
What is meant by "my own good?" David P. Gauthier, author of Morality and Rational Self–Interest,
says that "Either that the thing I get is good, or that my possessing it is good." What he is stating is
that good can differ in

Ethical Egoism: Are We Always Selfish?
Are We Always Selfish?
Selfish by definition is to be only concerned with one's self for their own gain, be it by action or by
motive. If one goes to the doctors because they are sick or just for a health checkup, they will
remind you that it is good to take time for yourself. In this very fast paced world we are living in
sometimes we just forget about us. Egoism in general paints a dark portrait of human nature, at the
same time it is very true that we are by nature selfish individuals and it is that survival instinct that
reminds us to be self preserving without regard to others. Observing my two very young children
reminds me how true this theory is. Children seem only to share things occasionally when it is
convenient for them. This ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are two distinct types of egoism that help sheds light upon whether or not we are always
selfish. The first type is psychological egoism in which every person seeks to maximize his or her
own self interests, often at the expense of others. The other type is ethical egoism where every
person ought to maximize his or her own self–interests so as it is not moral. The contrasting
difference in answering the question is that the psychological egoism will answer yes, the ethical
egoism will answer yes only when the action is morally right, while the altruist will answer no.
Psychological egoists stance is that we are always selfish in that there is no free lunch for you! They
believe that there s nothing wrong about being selfish because we were born as selfish individuals.
Psychological egoists will always look out for an opportunity that will benefit themselves, even
when helping other people. Ethical egoists believe that there can never be a conflict between self
interest and morality if the actions are morally right because they promote one's interest. While the
psychological altruist stand firm that we are not always selfish to which I would agree with. To say
that we are always selfish, the world would be a terrifying place, and our

Psychological Egoism (Philosophy Paper)
Psychological Egoism (Philosophy Paper)
Psychological egoism is the view that people are always selfish. When was the last time you did a
good deed? Did you do it for its own sake, or for your own? The egoist says that all of us are
necessarily self–regarding. I shall argue that this view is incorrect.
First we should ask, what kind of claim is this? Is it an a priori claim, or a generalization from
experience? If it were the latter, we could never conclusively prove it: we could never show that
necessarily all actions are selfish. So it must be a priori. But no a priori claim could be substantive: a
priori truths are all analytic (that is, the predicate is contained in the subject). So if this claim were
analytic, it would become ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Compare the case in which someone types for hours on a philosophy paper and gets a cramp in his
hand. Did I type in order to get the cramp? Of course not. To be sure, it was a foreseeable result of
my typing, but it was not the motive for my heroic efforts.
Perhaps we can go further in refuting the egoist's claims. Phil Washburn presents the opposing view
in his book Philosophical Dilemmas. This is called psychological altruism. The altruist points to
phenomena such as love that seem to show that people can be genuinely other–regarding.
What will the egoist say? The egoist has to admit that there seem to be acts of selflessness, such as
the soldier who jumps on a grenade to save his comrades. Here Washburn's egoist appeals to re–
interpretation: there is always a competing story the egoist can give that makes the act turn out to be
selfish. Perhaps the soldier wanted to avoid the pain of living on as a coward, or wanted to become a
hero and bring glory to himself and his family.
Yes, perhaps. But it's not enough simply to present such a story: one must also give some reason to
suppose that it is true in the case at hand. Since egoism is an a priori claim, as we have seen, it
supposes that in every case such a story will be not just available but justified by the evidence. But
this is totally implausible. The egoist's 'just–so' stories are just so much hot air.
We need not

Examples Of Egoism In The Hard Problem
The Prevalence of Egoism
In The Hard Problem, one of the central issues of the book revolves around egoism veruses altruism.
Whether humans can naturally be altruist, or if they can even truly make altruist actions. Humans
are naturally egoistic. Humans evolved this way because evolutionarily it was beneficial. Therefore
that behavior has stuck around. In The Hard Problem it is evident that altruism is not real, all actions
reflect some form of egoism or just aren't altruistic. In The Hard Problem the main character Hilary
is tutored by Spike, a very egoist man who helps Hilary. Yet, from a exchange between him and
Hilary. It was quite clear why he helps her "S: I go miles out of my way because you invite me in for
coffee and I throw in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many would argue that Hilary is an altruist. That she makes actions that negatively affect herself in
order to help others. Though this is simply not true. One case where it is thought she is acting
altruistically, is when she saves Bo by taking the fall for the false data when taking to Leo. "H: I did.
I cleared it... L: All right... She gets a formal warning H: Thank you... L: Stop saying that. It's you I
don't wanna lose. H:I'm going back to school" (Scene 11 pg 70) While Hillary does in fact save Bo
for really nothing in return, and it very thankful for Leo not firing her. It is not an altruist act, as
saving Bo really has no negative effect on Hillary anyways. Hillary is going back to school
anyways, getting fired has no consequence for her. Doing something that really has no negative
impact on her does not make Hillary an altruist. The actress even conveys this in the play, acting
carefree and gleeful. During the above mentioned quote, showing that getting fired doesn't matter as
she is leaving anyways. Though this is not egoist, as Hillary does not benefit from it. It is not
altruist, as there is no sacrifice required here. Therefore Hillary is not an altruist. Humans cannot be
altruist, it goes instinctive evolutionary behavior present in humans. This is why despite Hillary's
argument that it is possible to be altruist. No character in The Hard Problem is shown to be that way.
They all act egoistically, not just via their dialogue but through their nonverbal actions and tone of
voice present in the play. Showing how they function as humans, on a greater level than just
verbally. This reflects that altruism not real and that egoism plays a major role in the behavior
present in the characters of The Hard

Psychological and Ethical Egoism Essay
Egoism is a teleological theory of ethics that sets the ultimate criterion of morality in some
nonmoral value (i.e. happiness or welfare) that results from acts (Pojman 276). It is contrasted with
altruism, which is the view that one's actions ought to further the interests or good of other people,
ideally to the exclusion of one's own interests (Pojman 272). This essay will explain the relation
between psychological egoism and ethical egoism. It will examine how someone who believes in
psychological egoism explains the apparent instances of altruism. And it will discuss some
arguments in favor of universal ethical egoism, and exam Pojman's critque of arguments for and
against universal ethical egoism.
Psychological egoism, a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If one performs an act beneficial to others with a view to gaining affection, respect, reputation, or
any form of gratitude then it is not an altruistic act. It is in fact a selfish act because the principal
motivation was to reap some benefit for oneself. The desire of this benefit exists equally whether it
is psychological, emotional, intellectual, or material. Each form of desirable benefit is
philosophically identical as a motivation. According to the psychological egoist, in most cases,
behavior may appear as if it is altruistic, but in fact, due to the motivation behind the act, it is quite
the opposite. Instead, the act is driven by a rational and reasoned desire to benefit by following one's
own personal system of values.
Individuals instilled with a belief that serving others is their duty may, contrary to the idea of
psychological egoism , begin the habit of performing truly altruistic actions out of this sense of duty
only. Some feel that even this can be construed as self–interest, because the benefit might be the
perceived avoidance of the anticipated feelings of guilt which may arise if the duty is not fulfilled.
In any case, there are those who rely on their sense of duty to direct them to what they perceive to be
virtuous behaviour. This frequently leads to resentment against those for whom they are performing
their duties. Moreover, some believe that altruist behaviour becomes an impossibility, as people

Egoism In Chrysanthem, By Ayn Rand
In a clash between the collectivist and individualist mindsets, the once Equality 7–2521 and now
self named Prometheus had proclaimed that the word "ego" is a sacred word. It is essential to note
that Prometheus himself is the true embodiment of an egoist as he worships the word and personifies
it in the best way possible. While egoism may be viewed as an awful philosophy to live by, it is the
path which true arbors of inspiration and creativity within a society follow. Imagine a society where
oppression occurs on a daily basis, a world lacking of an outlet for one's self, an "egoless"
community where members claim that equality reigns over them rather than their own sense of
discernment. An absence of egoists may sound appealing to some, but the ego is solely responsible
for a human's sense of self identity, as opposed to a collectivist who sacrifices their sense of self to
attempt become "one" with those within their community. While the collectivists preach a goal
which fails to keep all happy and innovative and rather stupefies and limits all that surround them,
the egoist is the ultimate mastermind behind all of the things which keep the world in constant ...
Like many egoists, Prometheus is motivated by his high intelligence and carries a subconscious
feeling of unbelonging in his given place within the collectivist society as a city sweeper. He had
stolen scrolls and such from the House of Scholars out of his innate curiosity and has gone on by
exploring and discovering things in which he discovers purely out of his curiosity, for answers, for
his own intellectual pleasure. Equality is rightful in his self motivations and discoveries, as they will
benefit him, Gaea and whichever other followers might stumble across

Egoism Vs Altruism Essay
The ethical debate between Egoism and Altruism was extremely interesting to read about. I truly had
an "aha" moment because this debate is a topic that is rarely tackled or approached from the
perspective that being selfish is not a bad thing. At first, I thought this argument against altruism
was insane, however, once I tried to think of examples that prove its insanity I thought of nothing.
This is when I came to the conclusion that yes, whether its selfishness or selflessness, both have
different meanings to different people. Laurena Becker, in her article "Encyclopedia of Ethics,"
mentioned that one of the definitions for selflessness is "a regard for the well–being of others for its
own sake" (35). I believe this is the definition that most people refer to. For example, when we think
about a sister staying up all night to take care of her younger sibling whose sick, we tend to say
"aww, she's so sweet and selfless". However, can we even say that a sibling is selfless for taking
care of her own sibling? A part of me views that as being her job as an older sister while another part
of me also views this as being a kind gesture; and in actuality it may be a little bit of both. This
aspect interferes with Rand's statement, in the book "Objectively ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, not letting someone take advantage of you or your resources and choosing to focus on
your wellbeing instead is a good thing. I believe that if someone donates clothes to the homeless,
even if it's with the intentions of feeling better about one's self, isn't necessarily unethical because no
harm is being done. The person is not only going to feel more satisfied with themselves but would
also be doing those who are less fortunate a favor. Although this may seem a bit heartless, but it's
true if one simply takes into consideration the consequences of one's actions rather than their intents
(although Rand would say the

The Ethical Theory Of Ethical Egoism
Ethical egoism is defined roughly by stating how people do things or react to what is in their best
interest. This theory gets its meaning because the word "egoism" derives from the Latin term "ego",
meaning "I" in English (Moseley). The motivation of ethical egoism depends on how the situation
will act upon one's self–interest. In this paper, I am going to defend and explain that babies are born
with morality of the ethical egoism theory. Ethical egoism stands out from the rest of the ethical
theories, due to the fact, that it focuses on the individual and how it will benefit them and only them.
People who do not go out of their way to help others unless it benefits them are known as, ethical
egoists. People following the ethical egoism theory typically are looking out what is better for them.
For example, a person invites her friend to go to the store late at night because she is afraid to go
alone since crime is high in the area, she is thinking of her own safety first not so much her friends'
safety. Is being an ethical egoist a bad morality? The answer to the question is simply, no. We in fact
are born as an ethical egoist. As babies, we are after our own self–interest, not others, because we do
not know any better at such a young age. In a way we all have a part of ethical egoism in our morals
since we all start out as an ethical egoist when we are born. We are not taught to act in our own self–
interest it just comes natural. When babies cry because they got a toy

Othical Egoism : The Benefits Of Ethical Egoism
Egoism can be viewed differently by numerous behaviorists. For some, it can be good, and others
can see it bad as well. In the following paragraphs, I will deal with several definitions and position
taking by many behaviorists. To begin with, according to Shoemaker, psychological egoism is an
action someone meticulously does to benefit oneself. It is the state that each human's voluntary
actions are being acted due to their desire to gain satisfactory, benefit of ethical egoism–interest. As
an example, a man saves a boy from being drowned so other people can see him as a hero. The main
advance claim is that, it does not matter if your actions are right or wrong, your actions are to your
best interest. The logical error which involved in affirming that if psychological egoism correctly
describes how humans behave is the internal support. This goes against our moral principles. For
instance, if I committed adultery and lie, this act can cost me my relationship because I broke my
promise. This is the reason that many philosophers have concluded that ethical egoism is not be in
our best interest because it goes against our moral belief. Ethical egoism makes the rightness or
wrongness of actions depend on facts about one's self–interest. It is the view that you should always
act to bring about your self–interest. It does not claim that all persons, in fact, seek their own self–
interest, it only claims that we should or ought to seek our

Arguments Against Psychological Egoism
Daniel E. Webster Jr. Webster 1
Dr. Kathryn Broyles
Ethics 200
12 January 2018
Psychological egoism is the view that all persons, without exception, seek their own self–interest. I
am going to argue against this and I will also be providing two reasons as to why I feel this way.
Pretty much every human action, its main cause is a selfish act. Even when acts are ethical on the
surface are pretty much motivated by selfishness. Psychological Egoism is a theory that rather than
suggesting, as ethical or rational egoism does, how people ought to live. It suggests how people
actually go about their lives. One of the

Egoism And Egoism In Peter Parker's Spider Man
The stimulus that I have chosen for this internal assessment is a scene from the movie, Spider–Man
2. Peter Parker struggles to find a balance between his Spider man life and his life as a citizen; his
grades are steadily declining at university, he gets fired from his job and cannot find any time for his
friends. In the scene that I selected, Parker realizes that he has a choice, that there are no obligations
for him to climb walls and fight crime for a safer environment. He then decides to throw his Spider–
Man costume in a bin and forget about his super hero life, in order to focus on his own life. As a
result, his life as an individual is thriving, his grades at university are getting better, and he doesn't
have to fight crime anymore, which offers him more time for his beloved ones and personal
ambitions.
150 words Should an individual act for his own benefit? Or should he act for the sake of others? In
ethics it is assumed that right actions demand an individual to act for the sake of others, this concept
is known as altruism. However this view is challenged by the concept of egoism: the idea of putting
our own interests to benefit ourselves before ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is clear that an unjust man who has possession of the ring would act egoistically. But what about
the righteous man? Since he would not have any consequences for what he does, he does not feel
fear, in that case why would he act altruistically? According to Glaucon, he would not act
altruistically, as there are no consequences to his actions. I personally think that it depends on a lot
of factors and the person himself. For example a priest that has acted altruistically throughout his
life will probably act altruistically even while he possesses the ring of Gyges. He probably does not
want to act egoistically and the way he was brought up and educated will influences the ethics of
choices he will

Egoism And Ethical Egoism
Egoism is the idea of self–interest. It elicits what controls, and give the ambitions our self–interest.
When philosophers carefully observed egoism. Their thesis of egoism voiced that our intuition
controls what we do and there is two form of self–interest. We have descriptive which they think
temporarily that people's drives instantaneous aspiration. The normative way is where our self–
interest is developed based on experience and power. Theories of egoism also study the intentions
behind our actions. For example, do we act for love, religion, or wealth? Who benefits from our
actions, is it the individual or the whole of society? Two theories exist that try to answer these
questions, namely the theories of Ethical Egoism and Psychological Egoism.
Ethical Egoism is the normative theory that our self–concept should not be viewed as solitary but
instead as part of society. In this respect, our actions should also be for the benefit of society. Ethical
Egoism isn't about self–deprivation, but rather about helping yourself by helping others as well. It
relies not just on improving one's self but also on improving the structure of society. The strong
version of Ethical Egoism states that everything we do for our own good is moral and must always
be promoted. The weak version states that although acting for one's own good is usually for the
good of society on the whole, there may be conditions in which personal desires have to be
suppressed in order to maintain social morality. The weak version integrates the individual into
society in such a way that he or she must be willing to make sacrifices for the benefit of others.
In contradiction to Ethical Egoism, Psychological Egoism presents itself as a much different
perspective altogether. Psychological Egoism is the descriptive variant that states all human actions
to be the result of selfishness. The core of this theory focuses on a different definition of self–
concept or ego. However, there are many identifiable fallacies of Psychological Egoism. Firstly, the
theory is based on intangible terminologies of the inner self that cannot be physically examined.
Furthermore, when we do try to study Psychological Egoism in terms of scientific observations such
as human

Examples Of Ethical Egoism
When looking at the ideas of egoisms, two major views come out in the form of psychological and
ethical egoism. While both of the views hinge on the idea that everybody acts in their own self–
interest, the major separator is that ethical egoist views their pursuit of their personal gain morally
right (106), even if they have to kill or steal for it, compared to the psychosocial egoist who just
state that the only thing that motivates humans is their self–interest while the moral standings stay
the same (91) 1. And while some ethical egoists and also psychosocial egoists it is not prerequisite.
The major issue is the definition of psycho egoism, that the only motivation of humans is their self–
interest denying altruism, this ideal is false. A prime example is that story of PVT McGinnis,
throwing himself on the grenade to save fellow soldiers, As he was killed by the grenade how was
diving on it in his self–interest?. The egoist would say that it was in his self–interest to save his
friends lives, either to avoid the guilt of letting them die, or perhaps some other internal motive.
Now this sounds like a decent argument but with the psych egoist view is that it was all "self", He
expected to get something from it; maybe a medal or some praise, maybe even a promotion. But he
threw himself on a live grenade, he most likely was going to die, what could he possibly gain from
that? The egoists view on this action is false as there is no way that he expected any return on his

Example Of Psychological Egoism
Win Ma
PH–211: Ethics
Rejecting Psychological Egoism
Morality tells us what actions we should and should not do. We can only prescribe what to do or not
do for actions possible for humans. Therefore, we need to answer what human nature is like. Our
nature will provide us the motivation for our actions. One answer is psychological egoism, which
says the motivation of all human actions is self–interest. It stands implicitly in opposition to the
principle of altruism: human actions can be done for the sake of others. This is because if
psychological egoism is true, altruistic acts are egoistic acts. I believe psychological egoism is not a
well–supported position. To prove this, I will show how three psychological egoism–supporting
arguments are unsound. I will also propose an alternative description of human nature: Humans do
not always act in self–interest. Rather, they sometimes act in self–interest and sometimes act for the
sake of others. The first pro–psychological egoism argument I will consider is Shafer–Landau's
Argument From Strongest Desires. (Shafer–Landau, 94)
1. Whenever you do something, you are motivated by your strongest desire
2. Whenever you are motivated by your strongest desire, you are pursuing self–interest
3. Therefore, whenever you do something, you are pursuing your self–interest
The argument's problem is the 2nd ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If we insert misery, then we are looking at the principle in the context of the Argument From
Avoiding Misery. Psychological egoists do not specify misery has to be a certain way, but Landau's
principle lends itself to that interpretation because of how it is contained in particular actions.
Misery being described by bee stings means misery is avoiding physical pain. Not true, we can
describe misery with mental suffering from war trauma. Landau therefore commits a straw man. In
addition he commits hasty generalization, since he goes from particular to

Psychological Egoism : The Definition Of Psychological Egoism
Psychological egoism is the belief that a person's actions are prompted by their own selfishness. If
every action in the world was done, only to fulfill one's own selfish aspirations, then there would be
no purely altruistic deeds. Moral egoism is the belief that people should do what is in their best self–
interest; however, they have a tendency to carry out actions due to their genuineness. Based on its
definition, morality is doing something because it is the "right" thing to do. Psychological egoism
creates a threat to morality, because if a person is acting kindly, not because it is right, but because
he seeks self–gain, then morality is non–existent.
Feinberg says, "Every action of mine is prompted by motives or desires or impulses ... Show more
A second example is if a student in college wants to be a doctor in the future, he is only going to
medical school to become rich, not to help people, which is selfish. Ultimately, a person's actions are
intentionally selfish.
A moral egoist would say that there is no definite way to tell what a person is thinking before they
commit to an action. There is no scientific or psychological evidence proving this "fact", that all
people's actions are truly selfish. Feinberg says, "Not only is this presence of pleasure (satisfaction)
as a by–product of an action no proof that the action was selfish...the fact that we get pleasure from
a particular action presupposes that we desired something else–something other than our own
pleasure..." ()This means that when people carry out an action, their initial intentions are not to seek
self–pleasure but some other feeling instead. Doing something and receiving satisfaction is just a
positive consequence to the act in the first place. There is no real way to determine whether the
action was intentionally done to receive pleasure. For example, people that donate anonymously to
charities can't really be considered selfish. By them being anonymous, they aren't donating for the
admiration; therefore, they must've sought out a different feeling. Feinberg writes, "Every voluntary
act is prompted by the agent's own motives." This statement is ambiguous and can have multiple
meanings. A psychological egoist

Compare And Contrast Egoism And Utilitarianism
Egoism is based on self–interest and helping other people if it is in a personal interest whereas,
Utilitarianism is based on producing the most happiness. Both sides would say that the school
districts that unenrolled kids with poor academic scores did the right thing, but for different reasons.
Egoism (self–interest) would view it as the right choice because it makes all the people involved
look better and helps the district, well that was the case until they got caught. The people with
Egoism belief have no moral obligation to others unless it is in a self–interest. When the people un–
enrolled the kids it made that person look better as well as their coworkers and other people working
in the district. Getting rid of the kids with poor academic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Utilitarianism holds no regard to God and no regard to absolute moral rules, they just want to make
people happy. They believe in doing the thing that causes the most happiness and brings the most
pleasure. There no such things as good and bad, just pleasures and harms. They will view un–
enrolling the kids as the right thing to do because it brings more pleasures than harms. The pleasures
would be: more funding, keeping accreditation, looking better as a district, higher overall test scores,
higher district ranking, and possibly attracting more parents to the district. The harms would be:
taking from people who have earned it, lying, along with getting caught and being in trouble.
Although the people lied, Utilitarianism justifies what the school officials did because they believe
that what you do not know cannot hurt you. If they would have never been caught no one would
have ever known, so no harm would be done. Utilitarianism also allows promises to be broke, so
any promises or oaths a person may have taken when accepting their position, they are allowed to
break and un–enroll the students because it will result in more happiness for

Psychological Ethical Egoism
When it comes to life every person main is goal is to make themselves as happy as possible in any
choice that they make. Students that attend college want to have fun at school and get a degree that
benefits them. A degree might cost a lot of money but the benefits of being happy with a good job in
the future is greater than the cost. Every person has one life to live why not make the best of it by
focusing only on your own happiness. Ethical Egoism is a theory that each person should pursue his
or her own self–interest exclusively. Ethical Egoism and Psychological Egoism sometimes get
confused with each other but they both have different meanings. Ethical Egoism states that people
ought to pursue his or her own self–interest exclusively. While Psychological Egoism states that
people do in fact pursue his or her own self–interest exclusively. An example of Ethical Egoism
would be that a man should take his friend girlfriend from him because he wants her and will make
him the happiest man on earth. An example of Psychological Egoism would be a person saving a
child from drowning, so that he or she could be a hero and not look like an evil ... Show more
The world would be better off if every person only cared about themselves and not care about
benefiting other people. A problem with that argument is that if it makes the society better than it
goes against what Ethical Egoism stands for. The philosopher Ayn Rand believe that altruism will
cause a person to sacrifice they life to make someone else happy; thus only Ethical Egoism values a
person's life. The issue with what Rand believe in is that there's people less fortunate than others that
should be help by other people; therefore, it should be a balance between altruism and Ethical
Egoism. Ethical Egoism has opposing arguments on why it should not be practice by a

Essay on Psychological Egoism
Psychological Egoism
The descriptive claim made by Psychological Egoists is that humans, by nature, are motivated only
by self–interest. Any act, no matter how altruistic it may seem on the outside is actually only a
disguise for a selfish desire such as recognition, avoiding guilt, reward or sense of personal
'goodness' or morality. For example, Mother Teresa is just using the poor for her own long–term
spiritual gain. Being a universal claim, it could falter with a single counterexample. And being that I
believe this claim to be bunk I will tell you why!
If I help a friend out of trouble, there is a chance that I would feel happy afterwards. But was that
happiness the motive for my actions or just the result? I didn't ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, how can one know with any certainty that they are acting in their ultimate self–
interest? What they do could me in their immediate self–interest, but could work against them in the
future, knowingly or unknowingly.
Also, when a situation arises in which one must make a split decision, does the psychological egoist
expect a human to deliberate whether the action is in their self–interest or not? For example, if I see
my child run out onto a busy street and I can see that if I run out and grab her I can save her life and
if I do not, my child will be squished by a speeding car. Do I, as the egoist would expect, take the
time to deliberate that saving my child will result in all kinds of good for both her and I? No, I rush
out and grab her in an instant and the good comes later. Now of course it is true that we sometimes
get satisfaction and/or good feelings from acting unselfishly, but it would be a post hoc fallacy to
say that we perform unselfish acts solely for the sake of that satisfaction. Also, self–interest and an
interest for the welfare of others can certainly be bedfellows, and not strange ones. Using the
shopkeeper example, he could opt never cheat his customers simply because he knows that honesty
is good for business. He could cheat his customers and make a boatload of money, but he knows that
it is wrong to cheat and lie to people – it hurts them, is unfair and may make him feel guilty. So,
self–interest or selfishness is not

What Is Ethical Egoism Or Utilitarianism?
Both egoism and utilitarianism are theories of normative ethics, which provides a system of rules for
determining what one should and should not do from a moral perspective. Using these two theories,
we can compare and contrast how each would respond to the moral issue in which academically
failing school districts across Ohio removed students from the attendance roles in an effort to
improve test scores. in order to ensure continued funding and accreditation in their districts.
From an egoist perspective, one ought to look out for one's own interests exclusively. Egoism states
that the only moral obligation people have is to themselves and right and wrong are defined in these
terms. Essentially, the morally right action is the one which promotes the individual's self–interest,
and the morally wrong action is the one which does not promote the individual's self–interest.
However, this being said, ethical egoism does not imply that one should always do what they want,
but rather they ought to do what would be in their best interest in the long run.
Additionally, egoism accepts our intuitions that things such as killing, stealing, and lying are
morally wrong. Egoists would say that egoism actually underlies commonsense morality and ...
On one hand, they could say that the districts actions would not be immoral since they are pursuing
their interests first. They may support the idea that it is right for the districts to change the
attendance records and scrub the scores because it would be in the best interest of the districts to
appear that they are performing better than what they really are. In this situation, the districts use
their students as a means to an end. In other words, each district uses its students only as a means to
obtain additional funding and accreditation from state and federal

Liar Egoism
Virtue ethics suggests that morality is primarily a matter of individual character. It focuses on what
type of a person you are and whether or not you are a good person. One should display an
excellence of character and be virtuous in all that they do.
Ethical egoism focuses on oneself. The ethical egoist is concerned only with the consequences for
the individual and what is in their own best interest. Both egoism and virtue are displayed in the
films Sophie's Choice and Liar Liar.
I.
In Sophie's Choice, Sophie is held in a concentration camp with her son and daughter, when she is
made to make a decision no person should ever be faced with. A Nazi soldier tells her to decide
between keeping only one of her children and handing over the other, or both of them will be taken
away. Within a matter of seconds, she decides to keep her son, and the Nazi soldier takes her
daughter, presumably to be killed.
From the viewpoint of ethical egoism, this decision was the correct choice, because in the end, she is
keeping one of her children. Ethical egoism claims that we always pursue our own self–interest, and
in Sophie's case she claims that it is in her best interest to keep one of her children. However, she is
faced with serious ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
From the viewpoint of the ethical egoist, it always best to say whatever is in your best interest.
Telling a little white lie may be necessary and appropriate if it is your intention to benefit from it.
One might tell a small fib to avoid embarrassment or confrontation. For example, in Liar Liar,
Fletcher tells a coworker that her wacky hair looks good when in reality it looked insane. Fletcher
chose the egoistic approach and lied to his coworker because this way, he would avoid confrontation
with her and save her an embarrassing situation. It was the most convenient thing to

Universal Ethical Egoism
Ethical Egoism is one of the most controversial theories in all of Moral Philosophy having received
both bitter criticism and high praise from philosophers of all stripes. While it was a prevalent topic
in the mid–to–late 19th century, Ethical Egoism is rarely discussed today. This lack of contemporary
relevance stems from a series of formidable criticisms which gave opponents of Ethical Egoism an
apparent victory over its proponents. For the most part, however, these opponents have failed to
account for egoism's complexities; whereas there are multiple versions of Ethical Egoism,
opponents usually argue against a very narrow, general conception. Thus, in the following essay, I
claim that the argument is all but won by demonstrating that these criticisms are not as strong as
they appear. I will make my case by analyzing the multiple forms of Ethical Egoism as well as
addressing specific objections from several different ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Individual Ethical Egoism holds that "...for every person X and every action Y, X ought to do Y and
only Y if it is in the overall self–interest of a particular person Z", while Universal Ethical Egoism
holds that "...for every person X and every action Y, X ought to do Y if and only if Y is in the overall
self–interest of X" (Sterba 93). An Individual Ethical Egoist would argue that all people should do
whatever benefits individual ("my") self–interest while a Universal Ethical Egoist would argue that
everyone should do what is in his own interests. The main difference between Individual and
Universal Ethical Egoism – as their names imply – is universalizability. Whereas Individualists do
not concern themselves with the collective well–being of society, Universalists believe that
everyone will be better off if each person does what is in his best interest. Individualists tend to
think in terms of specifics while Universalists tend to think about the "big

Howard Roark And Egoism
Thematical diversity of the Howard Roark's architectural style expresses his world view. "Self–
sufficiency of man's spirit" (608), genius and independency of one's self are ideals forming the basis
for his views. Such views have always been strived after by each person because they are admirable
and right. But on no account, on average, can they be associated with egoism. So why does Howard
Roark call them egoism? Egoism as an ethical category has an extensive contextual interpretation.
Definition of the term provides a fertile ground for a distortion of its meaning. The custodian of the
masses' moral health engrains false rendering reshaping convictions of the majority. Results are
visible in Waidler's exclamation and Howard Roark's response ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The trusted medium, Roark, has natural rights to praise his idea, as he is one of the "men who took
first steps down new roads armed with nothing but their own vision" (679). The essence of Roark's
views is independence of man's ego and mind free from the conformity. It is the key not only to
mental harmony but also to further development of society, as "the moving force is the creative
faculty" which is "not selfless... self–motivated, self–generated" (680). While the main criterion of
egoism is personal worth, mental capabilities, society will be sorted out from "imitators" who
"copied imitations" (46). The idea will be followed by the brainpower in varying degrees. Results
will vary from the appearance of the beginnings of the self–respect to the forming of self–sufficient
man's spirit. While it will be turned into reality in the absolute form among the "creative minority",
far calmer forms will appear among the mediocre people. Definitely, qualitative changes are on the
way. Due to the individualists who fight for their truth the Wynand Building will not be the last
achievement of

Egoism And Moral Skepticism By James Rachels
James Rachels introduces in his written works, Egoism and Moral Skepticism, two different theories
of human nature: psychological egoism and ethical egoism. The theory of psychological egoism
refers to the view that all human actions are self–centered. On the other hand, the theory of ethical
egoism is the idea that we are not obligated to do anything other than what is in our interest. Most
individuals would consistently believe in ethical egoism because most generally care about the
well–being of others. The scenario states that there is an outbreak of a deadly disease in the remote
area where a colleague and I are spending our month–long business trip, working with two other
people from the local village. A viral of vaccine was dropped off by officials from the government's
disease control agency, but it is only enough to completely ensure two people and 99% chance if it
was equally distributed. My colleague and I are given the opportunity to keep the vaccine to
ourselves without the others knowing. My colleague, who is an ethical egoist, tells me that we
should not share because there is no reason for us to help the others and put our lives at risk for not
taking the full amount of vaccine. For the sake of the vaccine and the argument, I will accept my
colleague's ethical theory and based on his views, I will convince him to share with the others. I
believe this is a better approach because an ethical egoist's primary principle is himself and
therefore, by focusing on

The Three Argument Of Ethical Egoism
Ethical Egoism
I Shayka Wood
PHI112C41 Ethics: AH3
Professor Jake Camp Ethical Egoism is the doctrine that each person ought to pursue his or her own
self–interest exclusively. Ethical Egoism is the idea that the principle of self–interest accounts for all
of one's obligations (Rachels & Rachels, 2016). With Ethical Egoism, sometimes helping others will
also help yourself. Ethical Egoism does not say to not help others. "The benefit to others is not what
makes the act right; the act is right because it benefits you." A common misunderstanding with this
theory is that an Ethical Egoist is egotistical Ethical egoism endorses selfishness, but not
foolishness. The three main arguments of Ethical Egoism are altruism is self–defeating, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whistle blowing occurs when an employer asks an employee to do something immoral, such as
falsifying data or offering bribes. The employee may "blow the whistle" on the company revealing
the immoral and most times, illegal practice(s) which will result in them losing their job and are
blacklisted from the industry, leaving them without a way to support themselves and their families.
When deliberating on blowing the whistle, the employee becomes an ethical egoist. The employee
focuses on his or her self–interest which determines what they should do in the situation (Rae,

Egoism Vs Egoism

More Related Content

Similar to Egoism Vs Egoism

More from Jan Champagne

Recently uploaded

Egoism Vs Egoism