Developments in interactive media practices of youths Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Contents theory: learning ecology research conclusion: consequences for learning/education Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Conclusion don’t ask: which technology to use as learning tool?  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Conclusie don’t ask: which technology to use as learning tool?  instead: how to connect with the diversity of experiences and preferences of students, starting from a specific learning problem.  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Contemporary youth Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Contemporary youth impatient, short attention span always online and connected networking as a lifestyle  learning by doing, no books purposeful and practical multitasking Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Testing assumptions Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Results intensive use Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Results intensive use ≠ skilful use Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Results intensive use ≠ skilful use diversity in use (Kutteroff & Behrens, 2009; Schulmeister, 2008; Van den Beemt, et al, 2011)  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Results intensive use ≠ skilful use diversity in use specific sets of applications (Eynon, 2010; Van den Beemt, et al, 2010)  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Results intensive use ≠ skilful use diversity in use specific sets of applications peers (Van den Beemt, et al, 2010)  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Possible responses? Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Possible responses? Regardless of the use of interactive media Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Theoretical framework social action (Berger & Luckmann, 1966)  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Theoretical framework social action experiences, skills and preferences (Barron, 2006)  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Theoretical framework social action experiences, skills and preferences learning ecology   (Siemens, 2003)   Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Theoretical framework social action experiences, skills and preferences learning ecology   interactive media  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Theoretical framework patterns of  interactive media participation (Van den Beemt et al, 2010) (Barron, 2006) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Developments in patterns of interactive media participation among students   Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research 4 categories of activities: Browsing Performing Interchaning Authoring (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010, 2011) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research 4 categories of activities: Interacting Performing Interchanging Authoring (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010, 2011) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research 4 categories of users: Traditionalists Gamers Networkers Producers (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010, 2011) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Traditionalists: (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010)  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Gamers: (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Networkers: (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research Producers: (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research 4 categories of users: Van den Beemt, A., Akkerman, S., & Simons, P.R.J. (2009)  Jongeren en interactieve media: diversiteit in het gebruik van interactieve media onder jongeren . Kennisnet, Zoetermeer  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
4 categories of users: interacting Van den Beemt, A., Akkerman, S., & Simons, P.R.J. (2009)  Jongeren en interactieve media: diversiteit in het gebruik van interactieve media onder jongeren . Kennisnet, Zoetermeer  Research Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011 interacting performing interchanging authoring
Research 4 categories of users: Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011 interacting performing interchanging authoring
Research diversity in activities: stable Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Research diversity in activities: stable diversity in participation: dynamic Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Consequences for education content production Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Consequences for education content production motivation for out of school use ≠  learning in school Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Consequences for education content production motivation for out of school use ≠  learning in school diversity Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Consequences for education DIVERSITY experiences, skills, preferences Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Consequences for education Learning ecology: experiences, skills, preferences Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Consequences for education addressing by: permanent status feedback (games) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Consequences for education addressing by: permanent status feedback (games) group assignments, peer feedback (networkers) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Consequences for education addressing by: permanent status feedback (games) group assignments, peer feedback (networkers) text-based assignments (traditionalists, networkers) Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Consequences for education addressing by: permanent status feedback (games) group assignments, peer feedback (networkers) text-based assignments (traditionalists, networkers) (single player) casual games + group assignments Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
Conclusion don’t ask: which technology to use as learning tool?  instead: how to connect with the diversity of experiences and preferences of students, starting from a specific learning problem.  Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011
antoine @ manabi.nl www.manabi.nl @avdbmt resgamedu.blogspot Antoine van den Beemt  – 2011

Developments in interactive media practices of young people (ECE2011)

  • 1.
    Developments in interactivemedia practices of youths Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 2.
    Contents theory: learningecology research conclusion: consequences for learning/education Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 3.
    Conclusion don’t ask:which technology to use as learning tool? Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 4.
    Conclusie don’t ask:which technology to use as learning tool? instead: how to connect with the diversity of experiences and preferences of students, starting from a specific learning problem. Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 5.
    Contemporary youth Antoinevan den Beemt – 2011
  • 6.
    Contemporary youth impatient,short attention span always online and connected networking as a lifestyle learning by doing, no books purposeful and practical multitasking Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 7.
    Testing assumptions Antoinevan den Beemt – 2011
  • 8.
    Research Antoine vanden Beemt – 2011
  • 9.
    Research Results intensiveuse Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 10.
    Research Results intensiveuse ≠ skilful use Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 11.
    Research Results intensiveuse ≠ skilful use diversity in use (Kutteroff & Behrens, 2009; Schulmeister, 2008; Van den Beemt, et al, 2011) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 12.
    Research Results intensiveuse ≠ skilful use diversity in use specific sets of applications (Eynon, 2010; Van den Beemt, et al, 2010) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 13.
    Research Results intensiveuse ≠ skilful use diversity in use specific sets of applications peers (Van den Beemt, et al, 2010) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 14.
    Research Possible responses?Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 15.
    Research Possible responses?Regardless of the use of interactive media Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 16.
    Theoretical framework socialaction (Berger & Luckmann, 1966) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 17.
    Theoretical framework socialaction experiences, skills and preferences (Barron, 2006) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 18.
    Theoretical framework socialaction experiences, skills and preferences learning ecology (Siemens, 2003) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 19.
    Theoretical framework socialaction experiences, skills and preferences learning ecology interactive media Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 20.
    Theoretical framework patternsof interactive media participation (Van den Beemt et al, 2010) (Barron, 2006) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 21.
    Research Developments inpatterns of interactive media participation among students Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 22.
    Research 4 categoriesof activities: Browsing Performing Interchaning Authoring (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010, 2011) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 23.
    Research 4 categoriesof activities: Interacting Performing Interchanging Authoring (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010, 2011) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 24.
    Research 4 categoriesof users: Traditionalists Gamers Networkers Producers (Van den Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010, 2011) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 25.
    Research Traditionalists: (Vanden Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 26.
    Research Gamers: (Vanden Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 27.
    Research Networkers: (Vanden Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 28.
    Research Producers: (Vanden Beemt, Akkerman, & Simons, 2010) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 29.
    Research 4 categoriesof users: Van den Beemt, A., Akkerman, S., & Simons, P.R.J. (2009) Jongeren en interactieve media: diversiteit in het gebruik van interactieve media onder jongeren . Kennisnet, Zoetermeer Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 30.
    4 categories ofusers: interacting Van den Beemt, A., Akkerman, S., & Simons, P.R.J. (2009) Jongeren en interactieve media: diversiteit in het gebruik van interactieve media onder jongeren . Kennisnet, Zoetermeer Research Antoine van den Beemt – 2011 interacting performing interchanging authoring
  • 31.
    Research 4 categoriesof users: Antoine van den Beemt – 2011 interacting performing interchanging authoring
  • 32.
    Research diversity inactivities: stable Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 33.
    Research diversity inactivities: stable diversity in participation: dynamic Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 34.
    Consequences for educationcontent production Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 35.
    Consequences for educationcontent production motivation for out of school use ≠ learning in school Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 36.
    Consequences for educationcontent production motivation for out of school use ≠ learning in school diversity Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 37.
    Consequences for educationDIVERSITY experiences, skills, preferences Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 38.
    Consequences for educationLearning ecology: experiences, skills, preferences Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 39.
    Consequences for educationaddressing by: permanent status feedback (games) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 40.
    Consequences for educationaddressing by: permanent status feedback (games) group assignments, peer feedback (networkers) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 41.
    Consequences for educationaddressing by: permanent status feedback (games) group assignments, peer feedback (networkers) text-based assignments (traditionalists, networkers) Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 42.
    Consequences for educationaddressing by: permanent status feedback (games) group assignments, peer feedback (networkers) text-based assignments (traditionalists, networkers) (single player) casual games + group assignments Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 43.
    Conclusion don’t ask:which technology to use as learning tool? instead: how to connect with the diversity of experiences and preferences of students, starting from a specific learning problem. Antoine van den Beemt – 2011
  • 44.
    antoine @ manabi.nlwww.manabi.nl @avdbmt resgamedu.blogspot Antoine van den Beemt – 2011

Editor's Notes

  • #3 onderzoek: : ontwikkeling in patronen van interactieve media gebruik
  • #8 - assumptions of the homogeneous and skilful Netgeneration have been tested by empirical research
  • #10 Europe, China, South-Africa, USA, Canada
  • #13 youths appear to (un)consciously choose for specific sets of applications
  • #14 the selection of sets is influenced by peers
  • #22 cross-sectional analysis