International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER) is dedicated to protecting personal information and will make every reasonable effort to handle collected information appropriately. All information collected, as well as related requests, will be handled as carefully and efficiently as possible in accordance with IJCER standards for integrity and objectivity
Comparing: Routing Protocols on Basis of sleep modeIJMER
The architecture of ad hoc wireless network consists of mobile nodes for communication
without the use of fixed-position routers. The communication between them takes place without
centralized control. Routing is a very crucial issue, so to deal with this routing algorithms must deliver
the packet in significant delay. There are different protocols for handling the mobile environment like
AODV, DSR and OLSR. But this paper will focus on performance of AODV and OLSR routing protocols.
The performance of these protocols is analyzed on two metrics: time and throughput
SCTP-MANET NEW EXTENSION OF SCTP PROTOCOL FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF MANET PERFO...ijwmn
Ad Hoc mobile networks are constituted of nodes that move freely without a centralized administration.
These nodes contribute in the routing of data packets that are sent by a source. This happens when the
latter is not capable of reaching its destination. On the other hand, their mobility causes recurrent
breakdowns of the routing paths notably with sparse MANET. In order to optimize the performance of such
networks, we suggest a new extension of protocols: Stream Control Transmission Protocols (SCTP) named
SCTP-MANET. Their main function is therefore to improve the availability of the links in sparse MANET
protocols. This could be achieved by a better integration of Multihoming. With this aim in mind, this new
extension is based on a cross-layer interface between transport and routing layers as well as the use of
specific messages.
Performance Evalution of MANET Routing Protocols using Reference Point Group ...ijasuc
An ad hoc network is often defined as an “infrastructureless” network, meaning a network without the
usual routing infrastructure like fixed routers and routing backbones. Typically, the ad hoc nodes are
mobile and the underlying communication medium is wireless. Each ad hoc node may be capable of acting
as a router.it’s charactrizied by multihop wireless connection and frequently changing networks.we
compare the performance of on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks are distributed
cache updating for the dynamic source routing protocol(DSR) and ad hoc on-demand distance vector
routing (AODV).the simulation model of the medium access control(MAC) layer is evaluting the
performance of MANET protocols.DSR and AODV protocols share similar behavours.we evalute the
both on demand protocols DSR and AODV based on packet delivery ratio , packet delivery latency,mobility
variation with total number of errors, packet and normalized routing overhead,end-to-end delay by varying
in node density.the performance and characterictics are explained by the graph models.
Experiment of Routing Protocol AODV (AdHoc On-demand Distance Vector)IJMER
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) is Peer reviewed, online Journal. It serves as an international archival forum of scholarly research related to engineering and science education.
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) covers all the fields of engineering and science: Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Computer Engineering, Agricultural Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Thermodynamics, Structural Engineering, Control Engineering, Robotics, Mechatronics, Fluid Mechanics, Nanotechnology, Simulators, Web-based Learning, Remote Laboratories, Engineering Design Methods, Education Research, Students' Satisfaction and Motivation, Global Projects, and Assessment…. And many more.
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)IJERD Editor
This document summarizes a simulation-based performance analysis of three routing protocols (CBRP, DSR, AODV) for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) under different node densities. The analysis varies the number of data sources and evaluates the protocols based on packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, and normalized routing load. The simulation is conducted using the NS-2 network simulator for dense and sparse network topologies with 50 nodes each, varying node speeds and transmission ranges. Results show that CBRP performs better than DSR and AODV in terms of normalized routing load for more than 15 sources in both dense and sparse topologies, while AODV has lower delay than CBR
THE IMPACT OF NODE MISBEHAVIOR ON THE PERFORMANCE OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MANETIJCNCJournal
This document compares the performance of four routing protocols (AODV, DSR, OLSR, GRP) under the security attack of node misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). The document presents background information on MANETs and the four routing protocols. It then discusses two types of misbehaving nodes (partially selfish and fully selfish) that are modeled in simulations. The simulations vary the percentage of misbehaving nodes and measure performance metrics like packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, data dropped, and load. The results show that packet delivery ratio decreases and data dropped increases as the percentage of misbehaving nodes increases for all protocols. OLSR generally has the lowest delay while
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceresearchinventy
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year. It is an online as well as print version open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as: civil, mechanical, chemical, electronic and computer engineering as well as production and information technology. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published by rapid process within 20 days after acceptance and peer review process takes only 7 days. All articles published in Research Inventy will be peer-reviewed.
A Mobile Ad-hoc network is a set of mobile terminals moving in different directions at different
speed being wirelessly connected to each-other. In this paper we study the proactive Link State Routing
Protocol – OLSR, which uses hello and topology control (TC) messages to find then distribute link state
data throughout the mobile ad hoc network. Individual nodes use this topology data to calculate next hop
destinations for all nodes within the network using shortest hop forwarding paths. We then suggest ways
by which the existing algorithm can be optimized in terms of delay, throughput, power consumption, jitter
etc. Finally we summarize the applications of OLSR.
Comparing: Routing Protocols on Basis of sleep modeIJMER
The architecture of ad hoc wireless network consists of mobile nodes for communication
without the use of fixed-position routers. The communication between them takes place without
centralized control. Routing is a very crucial issue, so to deal with this routing algorithms must deliver
the packet in significant delay. There are different protocols for handling the mobile environment like
AODV, DSR and OLSR. But this paper will focus on performance of AODV and OLSR routing protocols.
The performance of these protocols is analyzed on two metrics: time and throughput
SCTP-MANET NEW EXTENSION OF SCTP PROTOCOL FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF MANET PERFO...ijwmn
Ad Hoc mobile networks are constituted of nodes that move freely without a centralized administration.
These nodes contribute in the routing of data packets that are sent by a source. This happens when the
latter is not capable of reaching its destination. On the other hand, their mobility causes recurrent
breakdowns of the routing paths notably with sparse MANET. In order to optimize the performance of such
networks, we suggest a new extension of protocols: Stream Control Transmission Protocols (SCTP) named
SCTP-MANET. Their main function is therefore to improve the availability of the links in sparse MANET
protocols. This could be achieved by a better integration of Multihoming. With this aim in mind, this new
extension is based on a cross-layer interface between transport and routing layers as well as the use of
specific messages.
Performance Evalution of MANET Routing Protocols using Reference Point Group ...ijasuc
An ad hoc network is often defined as an “infrastructureless” network, meaning a network without the
usual routing infrastructure like fixed routers and routing backbones. Typically, the ad hoc nodes are
mobile and the underlying communication medium is wireless. Each ad hoc node may be capable of acting
as a router.it’s charactrizied by multihop wireless connection and frequently changing networks.we
compare the performance of on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks are distributed
cache updating for the dynamic source routing protocol(DSR) and ad hoc on-demand distance vector
routing (AODV).the simulation model of the medium access control(MAC) layer is evaluting the
performance of MANET protocols.DSR and AODV protocols share similar behavours.we evalute the
both on demand protocols DSR and AODV based on packet delivery ratio , packet delivery latency,mobility
variation with total number of errors, packet and normalized routing overhead,end-to-end delay by varying
in node density.the performance and characterictics are explained by the graph models.
Experiment of Routing Protocol AODV (AdHoc On-demand Distance Vector)IJMER
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) is Peer reviewed, online Journal. It serves as an international archival forum of scholarly research related to engineering and science education.
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) covers all the fields of engineering and science: Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Computer Engineering, Agricultural Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Thermodynamics, Structural Engineering, Control Engineering, Robotics, Mechatronics, Fluid Mechanics, Nanotechnology, Simulators, Web-based Learning, Remote Laboratories, Engineering Design Methods, Education Research, Students' Satisfaction and Motivation, Global Projects, and Assessment…. And many more.
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)IJERD Editor
This document summarizes a simulation-based performance analysis of three routing protocols (CBRP, DSR, AODV) for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) under different node densities. The analysis varies the number of data sources and evaluates the protocols based on packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, and normalized routing load. The simulation is conducted using the NS-2 network simulator for dense and sparse network topologies with 50 nodes each, varying node speeds and transmission ranges. Results show that CBRP performs better than DSR and AODV in terms of normalized routing load for more than 15 sources in both dense and sparse topologies, while AODV has lower delay than CBR
THE IMPACT OF NODE MISBEHAVIOR ON THE PERFORMANCE OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MANETIJCNCJournal
This document compares the performance of four routing protocols (AODV, DSR, OLSR, GRP) under the security attack of node misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). The document presents background information on MANETs and the four routing protocols. It then discusses two types of misbehaving nodes (partially selfish and fully selfish) that are modeled in simulations. The simulations vary the percentage of misbehaving nodes and measure performance metrics like packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, data dropped, and load. The results show that packet delivery ratio decreases and data dropped increases as the percentage of misbehaving nodes increases for all protocols. OLSR generally has the lowest delay while
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceresearchinventy
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year. It is an online as well as print version open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as: civil, mechanical, chemical, electronic and computer engineering as well as production and information technology. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published by rapid process within 20 days after acceptance and peer review process takes only 7 days. All articles published in Research Inventy will be peer-reviewed.
A Mobile Ad-hoc network is a set of mobile terminals moving in different directions at different
speed being wirelessly connected to each-other. In this paper we study the proactive Link State Routing
Protocol – OLSR, which uses hello and topology control (TC) messages to find then distribute link state
data throughout the mobile ad hoc network. Individual nodes use this topology data to calculate next hop
destinations for all nodes within the network using shortest hop forwarding paths. We then suggest ways
by which the existing algorithm can be optimized in terms of delay, throughput, power consumption, jitter
etc. Finally we summarize the applications of OLSR.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ON EXTENDED ROUTING PROTOCOL OF AODV IN MANETijasuc
This document summarizes and compares two extended versions of the AODV routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs): Reverse AODV (RAODV) and Multicast AODV (MAODV). RAODV aims to improve routing performance by allowing multiple route reply messages, while MAODV allows nodes to send multicast data packets through a multicast group tree. The document outlines the key features and operations of each protocol, including route discovery processes. It then evaluates and compares the performance of RAODV and MAODV using metrics like end-to-end delay and overhead while varying the number of nodes.
Abstract— A MANETs is a self-configuring network is a collection of mobile hosts that are connected via a wireless link. Opportunistic data forwarding has drawn much attention in the research community of multihop wireless networks. Opportunistic data forwarding is the lack of an efficient, lightweight proactive routing scheme with strong source routing capability. In this project proposed to a lightweight proactive source routing (PSR) protocol. PSR can be maintained at different network topology information than distance vector (DV), link state (LS), optimized link State routing (OLSR), then reactive source routing [e.g., dynamic source routing (DSR)]. In this project concentrate on reducing the overhead at the base line protocols, then testing to the better data transportation. Network Simulator (NS-2) help in testing and implementing to this project for effectively reduced to the overhead in the data transportation.
IMPROVED NETWORK CONNECTIVITY IN MANETSIJCNCJournal
The growth in wireless communication technologies has resulted in a considerable amount of
attention given to mobile adhoc networks. All mobile hosts in an adhoc network are embedded with
packet forwarding capabilities. It is decentralized and is independent of infrastructure. Since mobile
hosts in an adhoc network usually move freely, the topology of the network changes dynamically and
disconnection occurs frequently. These characteristics require the routing protocols to find an
alternative path towards the destination for data transfer. The existing on-demand routing protocols
does the alternative path establishment only after the disconnection of links in the existing path. The
data sent by the source during alternate path establishment period will be lost leading to incomplete
data transfer. The network traffic will therefore increase considerably. This problem can be overcome
by establishing an alternative path when the existing path is more likely to be broken, by sending a
warning message to the source indicating the likelihood of disconnection. In this paper an attempt has
been made to analyze a protocol that improves the network connectivity by preempting the alternative
path before the existing link gets failed by monitoring the signal strength and ‘age of the path’.
An ad hoc wireless network contains mobile
networks which creates an underlying architecture for
communication without the help of traditional fixed-position
routers. Nevertheless, the architecture must maintain
communication routes although the hosts are mobile and they
have limited transmission range. There are different protocols for
handling the routing in the mobile environment. This paper will
focus on two well know algorithms: Optimized Link State
Routing Protocol and Optimized Linked State Routing Protocol
for Energy Consumption.
The Extended Clustering Ad Hoc Routing Protocol (Ecrp)IJCNCJournal
Ad hoc networks are a collection of mobile nodes communicating via wireless channels without any fixed
infrastructure. Because of their ease and low cost of building, ad hoc networks have a lot of attractive
applications in different fields. The topology of ad hoc networks changes dynamically, and each node in the
network can act as a host or router. With the increase in the number of wireless devices and large amount
of traffic to be exchanged, the demand for scalable routing protocols has increased. This paper presents a
scalable routing protocol, based on AODV protocol, called the Extended Clustering Ad Hoc Routing
Protocol (ECRP). This is a hybrid protocol, which combines reactive and proactive approaches in routing.
The protocol uses the Global Positioning System to determine the position of certain nodes in the network.
The evaluation methodology and simulation results obtained show that the protocol is efficient and scales
well in large networks
MDSR to Reduce Link Breakage Routing Overhead in MANET Using PRMIOSR Journals
This document proposes a modification to the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol called Modified DSR (MDSR) to reduce routing overhead caused by frequent link breakages in mobile ad hoc networks. MDSR adds a link breakage prediction algorithm that uses signal strength measurements to predict when a link may break. Intermediate nodes monitor signal strength and warn the source node if a link may soon break. This allows the source to proactively rebuild the route or switch to a backup route to avoid disconnection. Simulation results showed MDSR can reduce the number of dropped packets by at least 25% compared to standard DSR. The document also discusses how DSR works and the proposed proactive route maintenance concept in M
On the routing overhead in infrastructureless multihop wireless networksNarendra Singh Yadav
Routing in infrastructureless multihop wireless networks is a challenging task and has received a vast amount of attention from researchers. This has lead to development of many different routing protocols each having their own superiorities and pitfalls making it very difficult to decide on a better protocol under vulnerable scenarios in such networks. In this paper the performance of three routing protocols (DSR, AODV and CBRP) in terms of routing overhead in bytes and in packets is presented under growing density and varying mobility in different traffic conditions. The simulation results show that CBRP outperforms both DSR and AODV in all scenarios.
ENERGY AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF REACTIVE, PROACTIVE, AND HYBRID ROUTING ...ijwmn
This paper evaluates the energy consumption of well-known routing protocols, along with other metrics
such as throughput, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and delay in different scenarios. We consider two other
metrics in order to capture the efficiency of the energy consumption: e-throughput which is the ratio
between the consumed energy and the throughput; and the e-PDR which is the ratio between the
consumed energy and the PDR. We compare four routing protocols: AODV, OLSR, and HWMP in
Reactive and Proactive modes. The number of nodes is varying between 25 and 81 nodes, with different
mobility models. Simulations are conducted using NS3 and the parameters of a real network interface
card. From the results, AODV presents the lowest energy consumption and a better e-Throughput. OLSR
provides a better e-PDR in mobile scenarios. With a smaller e-PDR and e-Throughput, the proactive
mode of HWMP is more energy efficient than the reactive mode.
IJERA (International journal of Engineering Research and Applications) is International online, ... peer reviewed journal. For more detail or submit your article, please visit www.ijera.com
Experimental Analysis Of On Demand Routing Protocolsmita gupta
The document discusses experimental analysis of on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. It provides an outline and introduces key terminologies for multi-hop networks, protocols, routers, hubs, switches, and network topologies. The literature review summarizes several research papers that analyze routing protocols like AODV, DSR, and DSDV using simulation tools to evaluate metrics such as packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, and network throughput under different mobility conditions. The problem statement indicates the document will experimentally analyze and compare the performance of on-demand routing protocols.
A SURVEY OF ENHANCED ROUTING PROTOCOLS FOR MANETspijans
This document summarizes and surveys several enhanced routing protocols that have been developed for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). It begins by providing background on routing challenges in MANETs and classifications of routing protocols. It then describes several traditional and widely used routing protocols, including DSDV, OLSR, TORA, DSR, and AODV. The document focuses on summarizing several new routing protocols that have been proposed to improve upon existing protocols. It discusses protocols such as BAWB-DSR, CCSR, RAMP, AODV-SBA, CBRP-R, and CBTRP - noting techniques, advantages, and disadvantages of each. The overall purpose is to review
Mobility is one of the basic features that define an ad hoc network, an asset that leaves the field free for the
nodes to move. The most important aspect of this kind of network turns into a great disadvantage when it
comes to commercial applications, take as an example: the automotive networks that allow communication
between a groups of vehicles. The ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocol, designed
for mobile ad hoc networks, has two main functions. First, it enables route establishment between a source
and a destination node by initiating a route discovery process. Second, it maintains the active routes, which
means finding alternative routes in a case of a link failure and deleting routes when they are no longer
desired. In a highly mobile network those are demanding tasks to be performed efficiently and accurately.
In this paper, we focused in the first point to enhance the local decision of each node in the network by the
quantification of the mobility of their neighbours. Quantification is made around RSSI algorithm a well
known distance estimation method.
This document analyzes the effect of node density on different routing protocols under FTP and HTTP applications. It simulates scenarios with varying node densities (20-130 nodes) using routing protocols AODV, DSR, GRP and OLSR. Key quality of service (QoS) metrics - throughput, delay, network load and packet delivery ratio - are evaluated and compared. The results show that OLSR generally performs best in terms of throughput and delay for both FTP and HTTP applications. GRP performs best for network load, while AODV has the highest packet delivery ratio for FTP. In conclusion, OLSR is the best overall routing protocol for supporting FTP and HTTP applications in mobile ad-hoc networks according to
A study on performance comparison of dymo with aodv and dsrIAEME Publication
This document summarizes and compares the performance of the DYMO, AODV, and DSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). It finds that DYMO has the highest throughput as it avoids expiring good routes by appropriately updating route lifetimes. AODV shows higher throughput than DSR due to avoiding loops and maintaining fresh routes. DSR initially has very high packet loss, but this decreases substantially over time. The document analyzes the protocols based on metrics like throughput, packet loss, end-to-end delay, packet delivery fraction, and routing overhead.
ANALYSIS OF PROACTIVE AND REACTIVE MANET ROUTING PROTOCOLS UNDER SELECTED TCP...ijasuc
This document analyzes the performance of two reactive MANET routing protocols, DSR and DSDV, under TCP Vegas and TCP Newreno variants through simulations. The simulations measured packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, and total packets dropped. The results showed that DSDV generally had a higher packet delivery ratio but also higher end-to-end delay and more packet drops compared to DSR. DSR performed better in terms of delay and drops due to its on-demand route discovery, while DSDV maintained more consistent routes leading to better packet delivery.
Tree Based Proactive Source Routing Protocol for MANETspaperpublications3
bstract: A mobile adhoc network (MANET) is a wireless communication network and the node that does not lie within the direct transmission range of each other depends on the intermediate nodes to forward data. Opportunistic data forwarding has not been widely utilized in mobile adhoc networks (MANETs) and the main reason is the lack of an efficient lightweight proactive routing scheme with strong source routing capability. PSR protocol facilitates opportunistic data forwarding in MANETs. In PSR, each node maintains a breadth-first search spanning tree of the network rooted at it-self. This information is periodically exchanged among neighboring nodes for updated network topology information. Here added a Mobile sink to reduce the overhead in case of number of child node increases and also to reduce the delay.
BETTER SCALABLE ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR HYBRID WIRELESS MESH NETWORKcscpconf
There are many routing approaches have been borrowed from mobile ad hoc network to achieve routing solutions in wireless mesh network. WMN was developed for reliable data communication and load balancing. AODV provides loop-free routes even while repairing broken links. This paper have been proposed an improved hierarchical AODV routing protocol
(IH-AODV), which exhibits better scalability and performance in the network. This IH-AODV protocol has been proposed for improvement in the scaling potential of AODV. MAODV allows
each node in the network to send out multicast data packets, used for multicast traffic. The wireless mesh network architecture provides reduction in installation cost, large scale
deployment, reliability and self management. It is mainly focused on implementing military or specialized civilian applications. Two protocols MAODV and IH-AODV were simulated using NS2 package. Simulation results will demonstrate that, IH-AODV scales well for large network
and other metrics are also better than or comparable to MAODV in hybrid WMNs.
A novel approach of hybrid multipath routing protocol for manets using receiv...eSAT Publishing House
This document summarizes a research paper that proposes a new hybrid multipath routing protocol called HMPRP for mobile ad hoc networks. HMPRP aims to improve performance metrics like packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, energy consumption and throughput. It applies concepts from AODV like route discovery and incorporates received signal strength and node-disjoint multipath routing. Simulation results show HMPRP outperforms AODV, OLSR and ZRP protocols across various node speeds for 150 node networks.
1) The document analyzes the performance of various routing protocols (AODV, DYMO, OLSR, ZRP, DSR, LAR1) in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) under different conditions like node speed and number of nodes.
2) Through simulation, it finds that reactive protocols like AODV and DYMO perform worse than proactive (OLSR) and hybrid (ZRP) protocols as node speed and number increase. DSR also degrades significantly with 100 nodes.
3) It concludes OLSR and ZRP have better performance in terms of total packets received and end-to-end delay compared to AODV and DYMO, especially
The document evaluates the performance of 5 routing protocols (AODV, DSR, TORA, OLSR, GRP) in a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) using the OPNET simulator. Simulations were run with 30, 60, and 90 nodes using email and video conferencing applications. Performance was analyzed based on throughput, delay, load, and data dropped. In general, GRP and OLSR had the lowest delay, DSR and GRP had the lowest load, and OLSR and AODV had the highest throughput, while TORA often had the worst performance based on the metrics. The evaluation provides insights into the relative performance of the routing protocols under different conditions in a MANET
Extension of Optimized Linked State Routing Protocol For Energy Efficient App...pijans
Mobile Ad-hoc network (MANET) is infrastructure less network in which nodes are mobile, self
reconfigurable, battery powered. As nodes in MANET are battery powered, energy saving is an important
issue. We are using routing protocol to save energy so as to extend network lifetime. We have extended
original Optimized Linked State Routing (OLSR) protocol by using two algorithms and named it as
Enhancement in OLSR using Residual Energy approach (EOLSR-RE) and Enhancement in OLSR using
Energy Consumption approach (EOLSR-EC). To analyze relative performance of modified protocol
EOLSR-RE and EOLSR-EC over OLSR, we performed various trials using Qualnet simulator. The
performance of these routing protocols is analyzed in terms of energy consumption, control overheads, end
to end delay, packet delivery ratio. The modified OLSR protocol improves energy efficiency of network by
reducing 20 % energy consumption and 50% control overheads.
ENHANCEMENT OF OPTIMIZED LINKED STATE ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR ENERGY CONSERVATIONcscpconf
Mobile Ad-hoc network (MANET) is infrastructure less network in which nodes are mobile, self
reconfigurable, battery powered. As nodes in MANET are battery powered, energy saving is an
important issue. We are using routing protocol to save energy so as to extend network lifetime.
We have extended original Optimized Linked State Routing (OLSR) protocol by using two
algorithms and named it as Enhancement in OLSR using Residual Energy approach (EOLSRRE)
and Enhancement in OLSR using Energy Consumption approach (EOLSR-EC). To analyze
relative performance of modified protocol EOLSR-RE and EOLSR-EC over OLSR, we
performed various trials using Qualnet simulator. The performance of these routing protocols is
analyzed in terms of energy consumption, control overheads, end to end delay, packet delivery
ratio. The modified OLSR protocol improves energy efficiency of network by reducing 20 %
energy consumption and 50% control overheads.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ON EXTENDED ROUTING PROTOCOL OF AODV IN MANETijasuc
This document summarizes and compares two extended versions of the AODV routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs): Reverse AODV (RAODV) and Multicast AODV (MAODV). RAODV aims to improve routing performance by allowing multiple route reply messages, while MAODV allows nodes to send multicast data packets through a multicast group tree. The document outlines the key features and operations of each protocol, including route discovery processes. It then evaluates and compares the performance of RAODV and MAODV using metrics like end-to-end delay and overhead while varying the number of nodes.
Abstract— A MANETs is a self-configuring network is a collection of mobile hosts that are connected via a wireless link. Opportunistic data forwarding has drawn much attention in the research community of multihop wireless networks. Opportunistic data forwarding is the lack of an efficient, lightweight proactive routing scheme with strong source routing capability. In this project proposed to a lightweight proactive source routing (PSR) protocol. PSR can be maintained at different network topology information than distance vector (DV), link state (LS), optimized link State routing (OLSR), then reactive source routing [e.g., dynamic source routing (DSR)]. In this project concentrate on reducing the overhead at the base line protocols, then testing to the better data transportation. Network Simulator (NS-2) help in testing and implementing to this project for effectively reduced to the overhead in the data transportation.
IMPROVED NETWORK CONNECTIVITY IN MANETSIJCNCJournal
The growth in wireless communication technologies has resulted in a considerable amount of
attention given to mobile adhoc networks. All mobile hosts in an adhoc network are embedded with
packet forwarding capabilities. It is decentralized and is independent of infrastructure. Since mobile
hosts in an adhoc network usually move freely, the topology of the network changes dynamically and
disconnection occurs frequently. These characteristics require the routing protocols to find an
alternative path towards the destination for data transfer. The existing on-demand routing protocols
does the alternative path establishment only after the disconnection of links in the existing path. The
data sent by the source during alternate path establishment period will be lost leading to incomplete
data transfer. The network traffic will therefore increase considerably. This problem can be overcome
by establishing an alternative path when the existing path is more likely to be broken, by sending a
warning message to the source indicating the likelihood of disconnection. In this paper an attempt has
been made to analyze a protocol that improves the network connectivity by preempting the alternative
path before the existing link gets failed by monitoring the signal strength and ‘age of the path’.
An ad hoc wireless network contains mobile
networks which creates an underlying architecture for
communication without the help of traditional fixed-position
routers. Nevertheless, the architecture must maintain
communication routes although the hosts are mobile and they
have limited transmission range. There are different protocols for
handling the routing in the mobile environment. This paper will
focus on two well know algorithms: Optimized Link State
Routing Protocol and Optimized Linked State Routing Protocol
for Energy Consumption.
The Extended Clustering Ad Hoc Routing Protocol (Ecrp)IJCNCJournal
Ad hoc networks are a collection of mobile nodes communicating via wireless channels without any fixed
infrastructure. Because of their ease and low cost of building, ad hoc networks have a lot of attractive
applications in different fields. The topology of ad hoc networks changes dynamically, and each node in the
network can act as a host or router. With the increase in the number of wireless devices and large amount
of traffic to be exchanged, the demand for scalable routing protocols has increased. This paper presents a
scalable routing protocol, based on AODV protocol, called the Extended Clustering Ad Hoc Routing
Protocol (ECRP). This is a hybrid protocol, which combines reactive and proactive approaches in routing.
The protocol uses the Global Positioning System to determine the position of certain nodes in the network.
The evaluation methodology and simulation results obtained show that the protocol is efficient and scales
well in large networks
MDSR to Reduce Link Breakage Routing Overhead in MANET Using PRMIOSR Journals
This document proposes a modification to the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol called Modified DSR (MDSR) to reduce routing overhead caused by frequent link breakages in mobile ad hoc networks. MDSR adds a link breakage prediction algorithm that uses signal strength measurements to predict when a link may break. Intermediate nodes monitor signal strength and warn the source node if a link may soon break. This allows the source to proactively rebuild the route or switch to a backup route to avoid disconnection. Simulation results showed MDSR can reduce the number of dropped packets by at least 25% compared to standard DSR. The document also discusses how DSR works and the proposed proactive route maintenance concept in M
On the routing overhead in infrastructureless multihop wireless networksNarendra Singh Yadav
Routing in infrastructureless multihop wireless networks is a challenging task and has received a vast amount of attention from researchers. This has lead to development of many different routing protocols each having their own superiorities and pitfalls making it very difficult to decide on a better protocol under vulnerable scenarios in such networks. In this paper the performance of three routing protocols (DSR, AODV and CBRP) in terms of routing overhead in bytes and in packets is presented under growing density and varying mobility in different traffic conditions. The simulation results show that CBRP outperforms both DSR and AODV in all scenarios.
ENERGY AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF REACTIVE, PROACTIVE, AND HYBRID ROUTING ...ijwmn
This paper evaluates the energy consumption of well-known routing protocols, along with other metrics
such as throughput, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and delay in different scenarios. We consider two other
metrics in order to capture the efficiency of the energy consumption: e-throughput which is the ratio
between the consumed energy and the throughput; and the e-PDR which is the ratio between the
consumed energy and the PDR. We compare four routing protocols: AODV, OLSR, and HWMP in
Reactive and Proactive modes. The number of nodes is varying between 25 and 81 nodes, with different
mobility models. Simulations are conducted using NS3 and the parameters of a real network interface
card. From the results, AODV presents the lowest energy consumption and a better e-Throughput. OLSR
provides a better e-PDR in mobile scenarios. With a smaller e-PDR and e-Throughput, the proactive
mode of HWMP is more energy efficient than the reactive mode.
IJERA (International journal of Engineering Research and Applications) is International online, ... peer reviewed journal. For more detail or submit your article, please visit www.ijera.com
Experimental Analysis Of On Demand Routing Protocolsmita gupta
The document discusses experimental analysis of on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. It provides an outline and introduces key terminologies for multi-hop networks, protocols, routers, hubs, switches, and network topologies. The literature review summarizes several research papers that analyze routing protocols like AODV, DSR, and DSDV using simulation tools to evaluate metrics such as packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, and network throughput under different mobility conditions. The problem statement indicates the document will experimentally analyze and compare the performance of on-demand routing protocols.
A SURVEY OF ENHANCED ROUTING PROTOCOLS FOR MANETspijans
This document summarizes and surveys several enhanced routing protocols that have been developed for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). It begins by providing background on routing challenges in MANETs and classifications of routing protocols. It then describes several traditional and widely used routing protocols, including DSDV, OLSR, TORA, DSR, and AODV. The document focuses on summarizing several new routing protocols that have been proposed to improve upon existing protocols. It discusses protocols such as BAWB-DSR, CCSR, RAMP, AODV-SBA, CBRP-R, and CBTRP - noting techniques, advantages, and disadvantages of each. The overall purpose is to review
Mobility is one of the basic features that define an ad hoc network, an asset that leaves the field free for the
nodes to move. The most important aspect of this kind of network turns into a great disadvantage when it
comes to commercial applications, take as an example: the automotive networks that allow communication
between a groups of vehicles. The ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocol, designed
for mobile ad hoc networks, has two main functions. First, it enables route establishment between a source
and a destination node by initiating a route discovery process. Second, it maintains the active routes, which
means finding alternative routes in a case of a link failure and deleting routes when they are no longer
desired. In a highly mobile network those are demanding tasks to be performed efficiently and accurately.
In this paper, we focused in the first point to enhance the local decision of each node in the network by the
quantification of the mobility of their neighbours. Quantification is made around RSSI algorithm a well
known distance estimation method.
This document analyzes the effect of node density on different routing protocols under FTP and HTTP applications. It simulates scenarios with varying node densities (20-130 nodes) using routing protocols AODV, DSR, GRP and OLSR. Key quality of service (QoS) metrics - throughput, delay, network load and packet delivery ratio - are evaluated and compared. The results show that OLSR generally performs best in terms of throughput and delay for both FTP and HTTP applications. GRP performs best for network load, while AODV has the highest packet delivery ratio for FTP. In conclusion, OLSR is the best overall routing protocol for supporting FTP and HTTP applications in mobile ad-hoc networks according to
A study on performance comparison of dymo with aodv and dsrIAEME Publication
This document summarizes and compares the performance of the DYMO, AODV, and DSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). It finds that DYMO has the highest throughput as it avoids expiring good routes by appropriately updating route lifetimes. AODV shows higher throughput than DSR due to avoiding loops and maintaining fresh routes. DSR initially has very high packet loss, but this decreases substantially over time. The document analyzes the protocols based on metrics like throughput, packet loss, end-to-end delay, packet delivery fraction, and routing overhead.
ANALYSIS OF PROACTIVE AND REACTIVE MANET ROUTING PROTOCOLS UNDER SELECTED TCP...ijasuc
This document analyzes the performance of two reactive MANET routing protocols, DSR and DSDV, under TCP Vegas and TCP Newreno variants through simulations. The simulations measured packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, and total packets dropped. The results showed that DSDV generally had a higher packet delivery ratio but also higher end-to-end delay and more packet drops compared to DSR. DSR performed better in terms of delay and drops due to its on-demand route discovery, while DSDV maintained more consistent routes leading to better packet delivery.
Tree Based Proactive Source Routing Protocol for MANETspaperpublications3
bstract: A mobile adhoc network (MANET) is a wireless communication network and the node that does not lie within the direct transmission range of each other depends on the intermediate nodes to forward data. Opportunistic data forwarding has not been widely utilized in mobile adhoc networks (MANETs) and the main reason is the lack of an efficient lightweight proactive routing scheme with strong source routing capability. PSR protocol facilitates opportunistic data forwarding in MANETs. In PSR, each node maintains a breadth-first search spanning tree of the network rooted at it-self. This information is periodically exchanged among neighboring nodes for updated network topology information. Here added a Mobile sink to reduce the overhead in case of number of child node increases and also to reduce the delay.
BETTER SCALABLE ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR HYBRID WIRELESS MESH NETWORKcscpconf
There are many routing approaches have been borrowed from mobile ad hoc network to achieve routing solutions in wireless mesh network. WMN was developed for reliable data communication and load balancing. AODV provides loop-free routes even while repairing broken links. This paper have been proposed an improved hierarchical AODV routing protocol
(IH-AODV), which exhibits better scalability and performance in the network. This IH-AODV protocol has been proposed for improvement in the scaling potential of AODV. MAODV allows
each node in the network to send out multicast data packets, used for multicast traffic. The wireless mesh network architecture provides reduction in installation cost, large scale
deployment, reliability and self management. It is mainly focused on implementing military or specialized civilian applications. Two protocols MAODV and IH-AODV were simulated using NS2 package. Simulation results will demonstrate that, IH-AODV scales well for large network
and other metrics are also better than or comparable to MAODV in hybrid WMNs.
A novel approach of hybrid multipath routing protocol for manets using receiv...eSAT Publishing House
This document summarizes a research paper that proposes a new hybrid multipath routing protocol called HMPRP for mobile ad hoc networks. HMPRP aims to improve performance metrics like packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, energy consumption and throughput. It applies concepts from AODV like route discovery and incorporates received signal strength and node-disjoint multipath routing. Simulation results show HMPRP outperforms AODV, OLSR and ZRP protocols across various node speeds for 150 node networks.
1) The document analyzes the performance of various routing protocols (AODV, DYMO, OLSR, ZRP, DSR, LAR1) in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) under different conditions like node speed and number of nodes.
2) Through simulation, it finds that reactive protocols like AODV and DYMO perform worse than proactive (OLSR) and hybrid (ZRP) protocols as node speed and number increase. DSR also degrades significantly with 100 nodes.
3) It concludes OLSR and ZRP have better performance in terms of total packets received and end-to-end delay compared to AODV and DYMO, especially
The document evaluates the performance of 5 routing protocols (AODV, DSR, TORA, OLSR, GRP) in a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) using the OPNET simulator. Simulations were run with 30, 60, and 90 nodes using email and video conferencing applications. Performance was analyzed based on throughput, delay, load, and data dropped. In general, GRP and OLSR had the lowest delay, DSR and GRP had the lowest load, and OLSR and AODV had the highest throughput, while TORA often had the worst performance based on the metrics. The evaluation provides insights into the relative performance of the routing protocols under different conditions in a MANET
Extension of Optimized Linked State Routing Protocol For Energy Efficient App...pijans
Mobile Ad-hoc network (MANET) is infrastructure less network in which nodes are mobile, self
reconfigurable, battery powered. As nodes in MANET are battery powered, energy saving is an important
issue. We are using routing protocol to save energy so as to extend network lifetime. We have extended
original Optimized Linked State Routing (OLSR) protocol by using two algorithms and named it as
Enhancement in OLSR using Residual Energy approach (EOLSR-RE) and Enhancement in OLSR using
Energy Consumption approach (EOLSR-EC). To analyze relative performance of modified protocol
EOLSR-RE and EOLSR-EC over OLSR, we performed various trials using Qualnet simulator. The
performance of these routing protocols is analyzed in terms of energy consumption, control overheads, end
to end delay, packet delivery ratio. The modified OLSR protocol improves energy efficiency of network by
reducing 20 % energy consumption and 50% control overheads.
ENHANCEMENT OF OPTIMIZED LINKED STATE ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR ENERGY CONSERVATIONcscpconf
Mobile Ad-hoc network (MANET) is infrastructure less network in which nodes are mobile, self
reconfigurable, battery powered. As nodes in MANET are battery powered, energy saving is an
important issue. We are using routing protocol to save energy so as to extend network lifetime.
We have extended original Optimized Linked State Routing (OLSR) protocol by using two
algorithms and named it as Enhancement in OLSR using Residual Energy approach (EOLSRRE)
and Enhancement in OLSR using Energy Consumption approach (EOLSR-EC). To analyze
relative performance of modified protocol EOLSR-RE and EOLSR-EC over OLSR, we
performed various trials using Qualnet simulator. The performance of these routing protocols is
analyzed in terms of energy consumption, control overheads, end to end delay, packet delivery
ratio. The modified OLSR protocol improves energy efficiency of network by reducing 20 %
energy consumption and 50% control overheads.
Energy and Performance Evaluation of Reactive, Proactive, and Hybrid Routing ...ijwmn
This paper evaluates the energy consumption of well-known routing protocols, along with other metrics
such as throughput, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and delay in different scenarios. We consider two other
metrics in order to capture the efficiency of the energy consumption: e-throughput which is the ratio
between the consumed energy and the throughput; and the e-PDR which is the ratio between the
consumed energy and the PDR. We compare four routing protocols: AODV, OLSR, and HWMP in
Reactive and Proactive modes. The number of nodes is varying between 25 and 81 nodes, with different
mobility models. Simulations are conducted using NS3 and the parameters of a real network interface
card. From the results, AODV presents the lowest energy consumption and a better e-Throughput. OLSR
provides a better e-PDR in mobile scenarios. With a smaller e-PDR and e-Throughput, the proactive
mode of HWMP is more energy efficient than the reactive mode.
This document analyzes the performance of three routing protocols - AODV, DSDV, and OLSR - in a mobile ad hoc network simulation using the NS-3 simulator. It describes the key characteristics of each protocol and the simulation setup, which involved 50 nodes moving according to a random waypoint model. The performance metric studied was packet delivery ratio. The results showed that OLSR achieved the highest packet delivery ratio, performing better than AODV and DSDV in delivering packets from source to destination nodes over the 600 second simulation.
Review paper on performance analysis of AODV, DSDV, OLSR on the basis of pack...IOSR Journals
This document analyzes the performance of three routing protocols - AODV, DSDV, and OLSR - in mobile ad hoc networks based on packet delivery ratio. It simulates the protocols using NS-3 simulator over 600 seconds with 50 nodes moving randomly. The results show that OLSR has the best performance with high and stable packet delivery ratio, while DSDV has the worst performance with many dropped packets. AODV shows average performance throughout the simulation.
Analyzing the Effect of Varying CBR on AODV, DSR, IERP Routing Protocols in M...IOSR Journals
This document analyzes the performance of the AODV, DSR, and IERP routing protocols in a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) with varying constant bit rate (CBR) traffic loads. It conducts simulations in QualNet 6.1 and evaluates the protocols based on average end-to-end delay, throughput, average jitter, and packet delivery ratio under different CBR values. The results show that AODV generally performs best with low and stable delay, jitter and high throughput and delivery ratio. DSR has better performance than IERP for throughput and delivery ratio. IERP shows the worst performance for delay and jitter as CBR increases. The document concludes by stating AODV is best overall but
A Survey of Enhanced Routing Protocols for Manetspijans
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) form a class of dynamic multi-hop networks consisting of a set of
mobile nodes that intercommunicate on shared wireless channels. MANETs are self-organizing and selfconfiguring multi-hop wireless networks, where the network structure changes dynamically due to the node
mobility. There exists no fixed topology due to the mobility of nodes, interference, multipath propagation
and path loss. Hence efficient dynamic routing protocols are required for these networks to function
properly. Many routing protocols have been developed to accomplish this task. In this paper we survey
various new routing protocols that have been developed as extensions or advanced versions of previously
existing routing protocols for MANETs such as DSR, AODV, OLSR etc.
Performance analysis on multihop transmission using arp routing protocol in i...eSAT Journals
This document discusses using the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) routing protocol for multi-hop transmissions in IEEE 802.11 ad hoc networks. It proposes using ARP messages between nodes to establish routes for sending data when the source and destination nodes are out of radio range of each other. Intermediate nodes receiving ARP requests or replies would act as routers, forwarding the data to the destination. The method aims to reduce overhead compared to other ad hoc routing protocols like AODV. Simulation results showed the ARP routing protocol performed comparably to AODV in terms of throughput, packet loss and round trip time for different distances and environments.
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology.
Analyzing performance of zrp by varying node density and transmission rangeAlexander Decker
This document summarizes a simulation study analyzing the performance of the Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) in mobile ad hoc networks by varying different parameters. The study uses the Network Simulator 2 (NS-2) tool to simulate ZRP under varying node density, transmission range, pause time, sending rate, and node mobility. Key performance metrics like throughput, end-to-end delay, and normalized routing load are measured. The results show that throughput generally increases with higher node density, transmission range, and pause time, while delay and routing load also tend to increase with those factors. Throughput decreases with higher node mobility, while delay decreases and routing load increases.
Influence of Clustering on the Performance of MobileAd Hoc Networks (MANETs)Narendra Singh Yadav
Clustering is an important research area for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) as it increases the capacity of network, reduces the routing overhead and makes the network more scalable in the presence of both high mobility and a large number of mobile nodes. Routing protocols based on flat topology are not scalable because of their built-in characteristics. However, clustering cause overhead which consumes considerable bandwidth, drain mobile nodes energy quickly, likely cause congestion, collision and data delay in larger networks. This paper uses an implementation of the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), an flat architecture based and the Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP), a cluster architecture based routing protocol to examine the influence of clustering on the performance of mobile ad hoc networks. This paper evaluates channel utilization and control overhead as a function of number of nodes per sq. km to show the effect of clustering. Simulation results show that in high mobility scenarios, CBRP outperforms DSR. CBRP scales well with increasing number of nodes.
Study of Attacks and Routing Protocol in Wireless Networkijsrd.com
Wireless mesh networks (WMNs) are attractive as a new communication paradigm. Ad hoc routing protocols for WMNs are classified into: (1) proactive, (2) reactive, and (3) hybrid approaches. In general, proactive routing is more suitable for a stationary network, while reactive routing is better for a mobile network with a high mobility. In many applications, a node in WMN is mobile but it can fluctuate between being mobile. Wireless mesh networks is an emergent research area, which is becoming important due to the growing amount of nodes in a network.
Analysis of Blackhole Attack in AODV and DSR IJECEIAES
This document analyzes the blackhole attack in the AODV and DSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). It first provides background on MANETs and describes common routing protocols like AODV and DSR. It then explains what a blackhole attack is, where a malicious node advertises the best route to destinations but drops packets instead of forwarding them. Through simulation, the document evaluates the performance of AODV and DSR under blackhole attacks, finding how the attack disrupts the operation of MANET routing protocols.
Performance Observation of Proactive and Reactive Routing Protocols with Incr...Computer Science Journals
Mobile Ad-hoc network (MANET) is type of wireless network in which group of mobile nodes co-operate to forward the data packets to their neighbours without using centralized authority or any physical medium like cables or base station.
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention (IJPSI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention (IJPSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Pahrmaceutical Science. IJPSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
This document summarizes a review article about energy efficient routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). It discusses how MANETs use multi-hop wireless connections between mobile nodes without a fixed infrastructure. It then reviews several prominent routing protocols for MANETs, including reactive protocols like AODV and DSR, proactive protocols like DSDV and OLSR, and a hybrid protocol. Finally, it proposes a new energy-efficient clustering-based routing algorithm that selects cluster heads based on node mobility and battery power to improve path efficiency and stability in MANETs.
The Impact of Signal Strength over Routing Protocols in Wireless NetworksDr. Amarjeet Singh
In ad hoc routing protocols the source node
may need an intermediate nodes to transmit the packets into
the destination if the destination is not within transmission
range of the source. This paper studies the impact of signal
strength of nodes over ad hoc routing protocols and explains
an important effect of signal strength on ad hoc routing
protocols in four different directions including the routes and
the nodes. As a result the study give an important
improvement in ad hoc routing protocols when using signal
strength compared to other ad hoc routing protocols without
considering signal strength.
International Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI) provides a multidisciplinary passage for researchers, managers, professionals, practitioners and students around the globe to publish high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all theoretical and empirical aspects of Engineering and Science.
Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERPPixlogix Infotech
Boost your website's visibility with proven SEO techniques! Our latest blog dives into essential strategies to enhance your online presence, increase traffic, and rank higher on search engines. From keyword optimization to quality content creation, learn how to make your site stand out in the crowded digital landscape. Discover actionable tips and expert insights to elevate your SEO game.
Infrastructure Challenges in Scaling RAG with Custom AI modelsZilliz
Building Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems with open-source and custom AI models is a complex task. This talk explores the challenges in productionizing RAG systems, including retrieval performance, response synthesis, and evaluation. We’ll discuss how to leverage open-source models like text embeddings, language models, and custom fine-tuned models to enhance RAG performance. Additionally, we’ll cover how BentoML can help orchestrate and scale these AI components efficiently, ensuring seamless deployment and management of RAG systems in the cloud.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1DianaGray10
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
Maruthi Prithivirajan, Head of ASEAN & IN Solution Architecture, Neo4j
Get an inside look at the latest Neo4j innovations that enable relationship-driven intelligence at scale. Learn more about the newest cloud integrations and product enhancements that make Neo4j an essential choice for developers building apps with interconnected data and generative AI.
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalizationZilliz
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup SlidesZilliz
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and MilvusZilliz
Spark is the widely used ETL tool for processing, indexing and ingesting data to serving stack for search. Milvus is the production-ready open-source vector database. In this talk we will show how to use Spark to process unstructured data to extract vector representations, and push the vectors to Milvus vector database for search serving.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
E04402030037
1. ISSN (e): 2250 – 3005 || Vol, 04 || Issue, 4 || April – 2014 ||
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER)
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 30
Performance Evaluation of Energy Consumption of Ad hoc
Routing Protocols
Mohamed Otmani1,
Abdellah Ezzati 2
1
PhD student, Faculty of Science and Technology Settat, Morocco
2
Asst. Professors, Faculty of Science and Technology Settat, Morocco
I. INTRODUCTION
Mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is the network of mobile nodes that requires no infrastructure or
centralized management in order to communicate. This type of network allows to create and deploy a wide
field of communication quickly, and that's what we need in several cases such as a natural disaster or battlefield
surveillance where there is no centralized infrastructure and all nodes are capable of movement and must
be connected to each other dynamically and arbitrary. However, due to distributed nature of the wireless nodes
and lack of energy resource this type of network must have specifics protocols.
In MANET network the nodes must the routing in an autonomous way, in this order there are three
types of routing protocol proactive, reactive and hybrid. Every type of architecture or protocol has some
advantages and disadvantages in this paper we will put this three types in test.
II. PROTOCOLS ANALYSED
The following protocols are considered for analysis:
• AODV
• OLSR
• ZRP
A. Overview Of OLSR Protocol
The basic principal of link-state routing is the complete knowledge of the network topology; each node
performs a discovery of its neighbors and informs the others. To do that several messages are exchanged and
different types of link are established.
1) Messages
HELLO: Allows the discovering of the network and sends the information about the state and
the type of link between the sender and each neighboring node.
Topology Control: Allows determining the routing table by forwarding the list of the
neighbors who has been selected as MPR by another MPR.
Multiple Interface Declaration: Declare the presence of more than one interface in the node.
Host and Network Association: To announce the gateway to a specific network like an
Ethernet network.
Abstract:
In wired networks there are different physical devices routing the traffic centrally, by consequence we
can create paths in the network by using multiple management rules, but in Ad-Hoc network nodes must
do this work in an autonomous way. For that there are three types of routing protocol proactive,
reactive and hybrid. The first one continuously calculates the possible paths to be available at the time
of transmission. The second one create the roads only when are needed. And the last one is a
combination between the two methods. In this study we will focus on three routing protocols AODV,
OLSR and ZRP; and compare their performance in terms of Routing Power, Throughput, Energy
Consumed in Transmit mode, Energy Consumed in Receive Mode, End-to-End Delay..
Keywords: AODV; OLSR; ZRP; ADHOC
2. Performance Evaluation of Energy Consumption of Ad hoc Routing Protocols
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 31
2) Links
UNSPEC link: A link with no specific information about his current state.
Asymmetrical link: We say that a link is asymmetric if a node receives a message
from another but there is no confirmation that the first one has been heard. It can be
called unidirectional link.
Symmetrical link: A link is called Symetric if the two nodes hear each other.
Lost link: When a link has been reported as symmetrical or asymmetrical, but there is
no message received for the momment from the node; we say is a lost link or a dead
link.
3) Neighbors
In order to discover the neighbors, each node periodically sends in the HELLO messages information
about neighboring, the nodes that are selected as MPR and the list nodes that are declared by that node as
asymmetric. We can say that there are three types of neighbors, and two different sets.
a) Types of neighbors
Not Neighbor: the node has no Symmetrical link.
Symmetrical Neighbor: The node has at least one Symetrical link.
MPR Neighbor: the node has been selected as an MPR by the sender neighbor.
b) Sets
The first set contains the one-hop neighbors of a node S, which having a symmetrical link with S
denoted N1(s). The two-hop neighbors of a node S are defined as the following set: N2(s) = {y|y ≠ s ∧ y ∉ N1(s)
∧ (∃ x ∈ N1(s)) [y ∈ N1(x)]}. These two sets N1(s) and N2(s) of each node S are built by the trading of HELLO
messages. This allows all nodes to have a vision for 1-hop and 2-hop topology of the network and have all the
information needed to build paths between a source and a destination.
c) Multipoint relays (MPR)
Even that all neighbors can read the packet already sent by a node; however in order to minimize
retransmissions of packets, OLSR introduces the principle of MPR. Every node can choose from its neighbors a
set of MPR, these MPR are the only ones can retransmit the broadcast packets. Each node S selects a subset of
MPR from N1(s) that allows it to be joined by all nodes in N2(s).
Figure 1. OLSR MPR
B. Overview of ZRP Protocol
The ZRP protocol [9] implements simultaneously, a proactive routing and reactive routing, in order to
combine the advantages of both approaches. To do so, it passes through a cutting concept network into different
zones, called "routing areas". A routing area for a node is defined by its "radius zone". This radius corresponds
to the maximum number of hops that can exist between two nodes.
1) Architecture ZRP
An example of area is given in Fig. We note that for a radius of area equal to two, the routing area of
the node S is constituted by all the nodes around the node S is a maximum of two hops between them. Are
included in the routing area, all the neighbors of node S and all the neighbors of these neighbors.
3. Performance Evaluation of Energy Consumption of Ad hoc Routing Protocols
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 32
Figure 2. Example zones
2) Routing within ZRP
Routing within a zone is proactively via IARP protocol (intra-zone Routing Protocol) routing to
external nodes of the zone is reactively through the IERP (Interzone Routing Protocol). In addition to these two
protocols, ZRP uses the BRP (bordercast Routing Protocol). To build the list of devices nodes it is to an area
and roads to reach them, using data provided by the topology IARP protocol. It is used to propagate search
queries IERP roads in the network. Figure illustrates the necessary implementation of ZRP protocol network
components.
A search path is as follows: we first checks if the destination node is in the area of the source node, in
which case the path is already known. Otherwise, a request is initiated route RREQ to all peripheral nodes.
These check if the destination exists in their areas. In the case of an affirmative answer, then the source will
receive a RREP packet containing the path to the destination. Otherwise, the edge nodes broadcast the request to
its own edge nodes which, in turn, perform the same processing.
Figure 3. Components
The routing protocol IERP: IERP is respondable management hosts that are present beyond the routing
area. IERP collecting routing information reactively through bordercast queries that contain
accumulations of routes from the source. When receives an IP data packet for an unknown destination
(that is to say that it is not listed in the routing table in the interzone or intra-area routing table), is
interrupted IERP. He responds by initiating a search for a solution ("route discovery") and bordercast a
route request.
The routing protocol IARP: IARP depends on the services of a separate protocol (referred to herein as
the "Neighbor Discovery / Maintenance Protocol) to provide information about the neighbors of the
host. At a minimum, this information contains the IP addresses of all neighbors. IARP can be
configured to support additional information on neighbors, such as the cost of a link.
The routing protocol BRP: The interface of the upper layer of BRP is implemented to be compatible
with any IP-based application. However, we assume that the hierarchy of the routing area is visible
only to entities ZRP protocol.
4. Performance Evaluation of Energy Consumption of Ad hoc Routing Protocols
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 33
C. Overview Of AODV Protocol
AODV (Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector) is a reactive routing protocol used to find a route
between a source and a destination, and allows mobile nodes to obtain new routes for new destinations in order
to establish an ad hoc network. In this order several messages are exchanged, different types of link are
established, and many information can be shared between the participants nodes. In AODV protocol we find
hello message and three others significant type of messages, route request RREQ, route reply RREP and route
error RERR. The Hello messages are used to monitor and detect links to neighbors, every node send periodically
a broadcast to neighbors advertising it existent ,if a node fails to receive an hello message from neighbor a link
down is declared. In order to communicate every node must create routes to the destinations, to achieve that the
source node send a request message RREQ to collect information about the route state; if the source receives the
RREP message the route up is declared and data can be sent and if many RREP are received by the source the
shortest route will be chosen. Any nodes have a routing table so if a route is not used for some period of time the
node drop the route from its routing table and if data is sent and a the route down is detected another message
(Route Error RERR) will be sent to the source to inform that data not received.
Figure 4. RREQ message
Figure 5. RREP message
1) Messages
a) Route Request (RREQ) Message. This type of message is used by AODV at first in order to
locate a destination; this message contains identification of request, sequence number,
destination address and also a count of hop started by zero.
b) Route Reply (RREP) Message. This type of message contains the same fields like Route
Request (RREQ) Message, and it sent in the same route of reception of RREQ message. When
the source received this message it mean that the destination is ready to accept information
and the rout is working correctly.
c) Route Error (RERR) Message. Sometimes a node detect a destination node that not exists in
network, in this scenario another message (Route Error RERR) is sent to the source informing
that the data is not received. RERR is like an alert message used to secure table of routing.
III. SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT
The simulation process of MANET is implemented using simulator Qualnet. QualNet is network
simulation and modelling software that predicts performance of networks through simulation and emulation.
QualNet run on a vast array of platforms, including Linux, Windows XP, and Mac operating systems, it can run
both 32- and 64-bit computing environments.
5. Performance Evaluation of Energy Consumption of Ad hoc Routing Protocols
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 34
Table 1.Simulation Parameters
Simulator Parameters
Mac Type IEEE 802.11
Protocols under studied AODV,OLSR,ZRP
Node movement model Random
Traffic type CBR
Node Speed 10m/s
Scenario Parameters
Topology area 1000x1000
Simulation time 30 Seconds
Packet Size 256 bytes
Generic energy model Parameters
Energy Model Generic
Energy Supply Voltage 6.5 Volt
Transmit Circuitry Power Consumption 100.0 mW
Receive Circuitry Power Consumption 130.0 mW
Idle Circuitry Power Consumption 120.0 mW
Sleep Circuitry Power Consumption 0.0 mW
A. Snapshot of Simulation
The simulations of energy model were performed using QualNet Simulator 5.0.1. The traffic sources
are CBR. The source-destination pairs are multiplying randomly over the network. The mobility model uses
random waypoint model in a rectangular filed of 1000m x 1000m and deploys 50 nodes. During the simulation,
each node starts its journey from a source node to destination node. This process repeats throughout the
simulation, causing continuous changes in the topology of the underlying network. Fig.6 Shows the running
simulation of snapshot when we applying CBR (1- 40) nodes and AODV routing protocol.
Figure 6.Snap shot of Qualnet Animator in Action
We obtained the number of scenarios in QualNet simulator with varying 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 nodes
selected randomly over a 1000X1000 topology area and taking different routing protocols which we are
consider in our simulation. These protocols are AODV, OLSR and ZRP. The node speed is 10 m/sec and each
simulation lasted 30 seconds simulation. We evaluate the performances metrics in Application and Physical
layers of designed scenarios. The performance matrices are given below.
• Routing Power
• Throughput
• Energy Consumed in Transmit mode
• Energy Consumed in Receive Mode
• End-to-End Delay
6. Performance Evaluation of Energy Consumption of Ad hoc Routing Protocols
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 35
IV. RESULT ANALYSIS
A. Throughput
The throughput of the protocols can be defined as percentage of the packets received by the destination
among the packets sent by the source .The throughput is measured in bits per second (bit/s or bps).
Figure 7.Throughput
Impact on Throughput: Throughput performance is high for AODV and OLSR. ZRP performance is very poor.
B. End-to-End delay
This metric is calculated by subtracting time at which first packet was transmitted by source from time
at which first data packet arrived to destination.
Figure 8. End-to-End delay
Impact on Average End to End delay: From the graph the average End to End delay is low for OLSR
while using less nodes as well as more nodes. AODV has high.
C. Data packet delivery ratio
The data packet delivery ratio is the ratio of the number of packets generated at the source to the
number of packets received by the destination.
Figure 9. Data packet delivery ratio
7. Performance Evaluation of Energy Consumption of Ad hoc Routing Protocols
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 36
Impact on Data packet delivery ratio: Data Packet Delivery Ratio is high for AODV when compared to
ZRP and OLSR protocol. Which increases the life time of the entire network for AODV.
D. Energy consumed in transmit mode
Figure 10. Energy Consumed in transmit mode
Impact on Energy consumed in transmit mode: Fig. 10 shows the total energy consumed in transmit
mode is very low for OLSR protocol when compared to the other two.
E. Energy Consumed in Receive Mode
Figure 11. Energy Consumed in Receive Mode
Impact on Energy consumed in receive Mode: ZRP routing protocol consumes less power than other
protocols in receive mode.
F. Routing Power
Routing Power = Throughput / Avg.End-to-End Delay
Figure 12. Energy Consumed in Receive Mode
8. Performance Evaluation of Energy Consumption of Ad hoc Routing Protocols
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 37
Impact on Routing Power: The routing power effect on AODV routing protocols more as compare
others, but as on average routing power of AODV protocol is reduced.
V. CONCLUSIONS
We observed that Energy saving is very important optimization objective in Manet, the energy
consumed during communication is more prevailing than the energy consumed during processing because of
Limited storage capacity, Communication ability, computing ability and the limited battery are main restrictions
in sensor networks. By the observations we compare that the impact of energy constraints on a nodes in physical
layer and application layer of the networks that AODV offers the best combination of energy consumption and
throughput performance. AODV gives better throughput, packet delivery fraction, average jitter and delay
performance compared to ZRP followed by OLSR. If we increased numbers of nodes also increase maximum
energy consumption in OLSR followed by ZRP then AODV due to routing control packets in the network.
Future work, we can reduce the waste energy consumption of the nodes by reducing the number of routing
control packets and reducing the energy consumed by nodes in a large network to increase the life time of
network.
REFERENCES
[1] C T. Clausen, P. Jacquet, “RFC3626: Optimized Link StateRouting Protocol (OLSR)”, Experimental,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3626.txt
[2] Raffo, D., Adjih, C., Clausen, T., and Mühlethaler, P. An advanced signature system for OLSR. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM
Workshop on Security of Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks (SASN '04)
[3] Hu, Y.-C., Perrig, A., and Johnson, D. B. “Packet leashes : A defense against wormhole attacks in wireless networks” In
Proceedings of INFOCOM, Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communication Societies (April
2003).
[4] Wang, M., Lamont, L., Mason, P., and Gorlatova, M. “An effective intrusion detection approach for olsr manet protocol”.
[5] T. Clausen, U.Herberg, “Security Issues in the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)”, International Journal
of Network Security and its Applications, 2010.
[6] Céline Burgod, “Etude des vulnérabilités du protocole de routage OLSR” 2007.
[7] Djallel Eddine Boubiche, «Routing protocol for wireless sensor networks, "Memory Magister, University of l’Hadj Lakhdar, Batna,
Algérie, 2008.
[8] Wendi Beth Heinzelman, «Application-Specific Protocol Architectures for Wireless Network », IEEE Transactions on Wireless
Communications, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2000.
[9] Z. J. Haas – « A new routing protocol for the reconfigurable wireless networks», dans Proc. 6th IEEE Int’l Conf. on Universal
Personal Communications (ICUPC’97) (San Diego, CA, USA), vol. 2, 1997, p. 562–566.