Decision Making: Decision Making Process, Stages in Decision Making, Individu...Ashish Hande
Decision Making: Decision Making Process, Stages in
Decision Making, Individual and Organizational Decision
Making, Decision Making Models, Information System
support for Decision Making Phases
Short presentation on Decision making.
Decision making variables, Types of managerial decision, Decision making process and Techniques for Stimulating Creativity
Decision making, Importance of
Decision-Making, Characteristics of
Decision-Making, Essentials for effective
Decision-Making, Types/ categories of Problems and Decisions, TYPES OF BUSINESS DECISIONS, Open decision making System, Decision Making Environment, The Classical Model of decision making, Decision making process, Decision Making Style
Decision Making: Decision Making Process, Stages in Decision Making, Individu...Ashish Hande
Decision Making: Decision Making Process, Stages in
Decision Making, Individual and Organizational Decision
Making, Decision Making Models, Information System
support for Decision Making Phases
Short presentation on Decision making.
Decision making variables, Types of managerial decision, Decision making process and Techniques for Stimulating Creativity
Decision making, Importance of
Decision-Making, Characteristics of
Decision-Making, Essentials for effective
Decision-Making, Types/ categories of Problems and Decisions, TYPES OF BUSINESS DECISIONS, Open decision making System, Decision Making Environment, The Classical Model of decision making, Decision making process, Decision Making Style
Decision making is the process of making choices by identifying a decision, gathering information, and assessing alternative resolutions. Using a step-by-step decision-making process can help you make more deliberate, thoughtful decisions by organizing relevant information and defining alternatives.
Organizational Planning And Goal Setting MGT 201 Helpful Slides For Management Students Of Different Universities In Karachi And All Over Pakistan And World
Decision Making Process & Styles of Decision Making at Management LevelQazi Faheem
The presentation explains the Decision Making Process & Styles of Decision Making at a Management level in a detailed manner. It has a video case study as well to simulate he idea of Decision Making in our day today life.
Directors Meeting - Oct. 21, 2022
University of South Carolina Division of Student Affairs and Academic Support
presenters:
Kim Pruitt, Assistant Director for Organizational Development, USC Human Resources
J. Rex Tolliver, Vice President for Student Affairs and Academic Support
Decision making is the process of making choices by identifying a decision, gathering information, and assessing alternative resolutions. Using a step-by-step decision-making process can help you make more deliberate, thoughtful decisions by organizing relevant information and defining alternatives.
Organizational Planning And Goal Setting MGT 201 Helpful Slides For Management Students Of Different Universities In Karachi And All Over Pakistan And World
Decision Making Process & Styles of Decision Making at Management LevelQazi Faheem
The presentation explains the Decision Making Process & Styles of Decision Making at a Management level in a detailed manner. It has a video case study as well to simulate he idea of Decision Making in our day today life.
Directors Meeting - Oct. 21, 2022
University of South Carolina Division of Student Affairs and Academic Support
presenters:
Kim Pruitt, Assistant Director for Organizational Development, USC Human Resources
J. Rex Tolliver, Vice President for Student Affairs and Academic Support
All business problems are people problems. And if you become a Jedi master of understanding and customizing your approach based on behavioral understanding, you gain an unfair advantage in your career.
In world of work, the masters of the universe are usually those who have mastered people skills.
Sometimes, these skills appear to be innate. But don’t be fooled; they can be learned.
The key to interpersonal skill mastery is understanding what makes people tick and adapting your style based on that knowledge. Once you’re able to do that, you’ll gain an upper hand for your career.
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...CIOWomenMagazine
This person is none other than Oprah Winfrey, a highly influential figure whose impact extends beyond television. This article will delve into the remarkable life and lasting legacy of Oprah. Her story serves as a reminder of the importance of perseverance, compassion, and firm determination.
Senior Project and Engineering Leader Jim Smith.pdfJim Smith
I am a Project and Engineering Leader with extensive experience as a Business Operations Leader, Technical Project Manager, Engineering Manager and Operations Experience for Domestic and International companies such as Electrolux, Carrier, and Deutz. I have developed new products using Stage Gate development/MS Project/JIRA, for the pro-duction of Medical Equipment, Large Commercial Refrigeration Systems, Appliances, HVAC, and Diesel engines.
My experience includes:
Managed customized engineered refrigeration system projects with high voltage power panels from quote to ship, coordinating actions between electrical engineering, mechanical design and application engineering, purchasing, production, test, quality assurance and field installation. Managed projects $25k to $1M per project; 4-8 per month. (Hussmann refrigeration)
Successfully developed the $15-20M yearly corporate capital strategy for manufacturing, with the Executive Team and key stakeholders. Created project scope and specifications, business case, ROI, managed project plans with key personnel for nine consumer product manufacturing and distribution sites; to support the company’s strategic sales plan.
Over 15 years of experience managing and developing cost improvement projects with key Stakeholders, site Manufacturing Engineers, Mechanical Engineers, Maintenance, and facility support personnel to optimize pro-duction operations, safety, EHS, and new product development. (BioLab, Deutz, Caire)
Experience working as a Technical Manager developing new products with chemical engineers and packaging engineers to enhance and reduce the cost of retail products. I have led the activities of multiple engineering groups with diverse backgrounds.
Great experience managing the product development of products which utilize complex electrical controls, high voltage power panels, product testing, and commissioning.
Created project scope, business case, ROI for multiple capital projects to support electrotechnical assembly and CPG goods. Identified project cost, risk, success criteria, and performed equipment qualifications. (Carrier, Electrolux, Biolab, Price, Hussmann)
Created detailed projects plans using MS Project, Gant charts in excel, and updated new product development in Jira for stakeholders and project team members including critical path.
Great knowledge of ISO9001, NFPA, OSHA regulations.
User level knowledge of MRP/SAP, MS Project, Powerpoint, Visio, Mastercontrol, JIRA, Power BI and Tableau.
I appreciate your consideration, and look forward to discussing this role with you, and how I can lead your company’s growth and profitability. I can be contacted via LinkedIn via phone or E Mail.
Jim Smith
678-993-7195
jimsmith30024@gmail.com
The case study discusses the potential of drone delivery and the challenges that need to be addressed before it becomes widespread.
Key takeaways:
Drone delivery is in its early stages: Amazon's trial in the UK demonstrates the potential for faster deliveries, but it's still limited by regulations and technology.
Regulations are a major hurdle: Safety concerns around drone collisions with airplanes and people have led to restrictions on flight height and location.
Other challenges exist: Who will use drone delivery the most? Is it cost-effective compared to traditional delivery trucks?
Discussion questions:
Managerial challenges: Integrating drones requires planning for new infrastructure, training staff, and navigating regulations. There are also marketing and recruitment considerations specific to this technology.
External forces vary by country: Regulations, consumer acceptance, and infrastructure all differ between countries.
Demographics matter: Younger generations might be more receptive to drone delivery, while older populations might have concerns.
Stakeholders for Amazon: Customers, regulators, aviation authorities, and competitors are all stakeholders. Regulators likely hold the greatest influence as they determine the feasibility of drone delivery.
The Team Member and Guest Experience - Lead and Take Care of your restaurant team. They are the people closest to and delivering Hospitality to your paying Guests!
Make the call, and we can assist you.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to radically reinvent the way we do business. This study explores how CEOs and top decision makers around the world are responding to the transformative potential of AI.
2. What is a
decision
making style?
• Reflects how a manager perceives and responds
to information.
• There are 4 general decision making styles:
• Directive
• Analytical
• Conceptual
• Behavioral
3. Decision making styles:
Analytical Conceptual
Directive Behavioral
High
Low
Tolerance
for
ambiguity
Value
Orientation
Task &
technical
concerns
People &
Social
Concerns
4. Value Orientation and Tolerance for Ambiguity
• Value orientation – the side of the spectrum in which a person
focuses on tasks and technical concerns or people and social concerns
• Tolerance for Ambiguity – the side of the spectrum in which a person
has a high need for structure or control in their life.
Tasks &
technical
concerns
People
& social
concerns
ToleranceLow HighNeed structure Do not need
structure
5. The Directive
Style
Action-oriented decision makersPros
Low tolerance for ambiguityLow
Task oriented and focus on facts when
making decisionsTask
Tend to be autocratic, exercise power and
control, and focus on the short-termCons
6. The Analytical
Style
Careful decision makersPros
High tolerance for ambiguityHigh
Task oriented and focus on facts but
consider all angles and alternativesTask
Take longer to make decisionsCons
7. The Conceptual
Style
Risk takers who rely on intuition and
discussions with others to get informationPros
High tolerance for ambiguityHigh
People oriented and focus on the social
aspectsPeople
Can foster an indecisive approach to
decision makingCons
8. The Behavioral
Style
Receptive to suggestions, supportive,
and prefer verbal communicationsPros
Low tolerance for ambiguityLow
People oriented and focus on the social
aspectsPeople
Adopt a wishy-washy approach and
have a hard time saying noCons
10. References
1. Kinicki, A., & Williams, B. K. (2018). Management: a practical introduction
(8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Editor's Notes
A decision making style is a direct reflection on how a manager perceived and responds to new information. There are 4 general decision making styles: directive, analytical, conceptual, and behavioral. We will discuss them further in the next slides.
This is a visual chart that shows the ranges for each decision making style. Depending on the persons high or low tolerance for ambiguity and their preference for task or people oriented values will determine their decision making style.
Value orientation is defined as the side of the spectrum in which a person focuses on tasks and technical concerns or people and social concerns. It is possible to be somewhere in the middle but most managers will lean one way or the other. Tolerance for ambiguity is defined as the side of the spectrum in which ha person has a high need for structure or control in their life. If one has a low tolerance they require structure and are stressed out in ambiguous situations. If one has a high tolerance, then they do not require a lot of structure and can thrive on ambiguous situations.
The firs style we will discuss is the directive style. This style’s pros are that they are action oriented decision makers. They tend to have a low tolerance for ambiguity and require structure in day to day activities. They are very much task oriented and focus on the facts when making decisions. The cons to this style are that they tend to be autocratic, exercise power and control, and focus mostly on the short-term.
The second style we will discuss is the analytical style. The pros for this style are that they are very careful and thought out decision makers. They have a high tolerance for ambiguity which makes them more flexible than the directive style. The are very task oriented and focus on the facts when making decisions but tend to consider all angles and alternatives, more so than the directive style. The cons of this style are that they take longer to make decisions.
The third style we will discuss is the conceptual style. The pros of this style are that they are not afraid to take risks to reap a reward and they rely on intuition and discussions will fellow peers to get information. They have a high tolerance for ambiguity which makes them flexible and they are extremely people oriented and focus on the social aspects of decision making. The cons are that this style can foster an indecisive approach to decision making.
The last style we will discuss is the behavioral style. The pros of this style is that they are very reception to suggestions, supportive of others, and prefer face-to-face, verbal communications. They have a low tolerance for ambiguity and are people oriented through and through. The cons of this style are that they can adopt a wishy-washy approach to decision making and sometimes they can have a hard time saying no due to their “people pleasing” nature.
My final recommendation after analyzing the 4 decision making styles is to adopt a directive style. I chose this because our company’s most important requirement for management is high performance and quick results. This style will ensure a systematic approach to drive fast results.