WELCOME TO LCRT 6915:
    SEMINAR & PRACTICUM
              IN
    LITERACY PROFESSIONAL
         DEVELOPMENT
January 30 th

•   Sign in attendance on the legal pad
•   Get a name tag
•   Find a place to sit & get comfortable
•   We will start at 5:00p.m.
•   Rebecca Schell, Academic Advisor, is
    with us tonight!
Getting
   Information

    REBECCA SCHELL

 ACADEMIC ADVISOR FOR LLCRT
      STUDENT SERVICES
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION & HUMAN
        DEVELOPMENT
• Graduation Application &
  Timeline

• MA Portfolio (Philosophy
  Statement, MA
  Reflection, Livetext)

• CU Email system is official mode
  of university-student
  communication

• CDE Endorsement/PLACE Exam

• Your questions?
Getting Started on the Philosophy Statement

Many of you already have academic writings from LCRT courses
that address key areas of the philosophy paper. E.g., writings
on:
• Writings about foundations of literacy & language (historical
  perspectives, foundational theory & research, perspectives about
  literacy & privilege, sociocultural perspectives on literacy, etc.)
• Connections between language & literacy development
  (primary & K-12);
• Writing development; reading development;
• Linking assessment with instruction;
• Connections between literacy & culture;
• Supporting literacy & language learning with children’s &
  adolescent literature;
• Think about the pieces of writing you can use or pull from.
Getting Started on the Philosophy (2)
Consider aspects of literacy teaching and
learning that are important to you. These
may be general, such as
The importance of using assessment to inform
 instruction;
The importance of planning & delivering
 instruction that is responsive to students’ broad
 cultural backgrounds; or
Learners’ language, learning & thinking are
 interrelated.
Getting Started on the Philosophy (3)

Or, these aspects could be specific, such as

The importance of small group instruction; or

The importance of supporting learners’ in-class
 discussion about new content; or

The importance of using formal & informal
 assessments.
Getting Started on the Philosophy (4)

Your philosophy may include beliefs about
teaching & learning that are not directly
related to literacy, such as

working with second language learners of
 English;
teachers’ work to advocate for students &
 families;
 providing students with choice; or
including multiculturalism in your curriculum;
Other?
TAKE TIME INDIVIDUALLY:
   WHAT ARE 5 TO 8 OF YOUR
   BELIEFS ABOUT LITERACY
    TEACHING & LEARNING?


 Literacy
 Language
 Culture
 Culturally responsive instruction
 What else?
NOW CONSIDER THE THEORETICAL
          UNDERPINNINGS OF YOUR BELIEFS
You’ve taken course work in :         •Whose work have
 Foundations of literacy, language &  you read?
  culture
 Literacy teaching & learning
 Primary literacy                 • What is the research
 Writing development process        that grounds your
 Language development               practice?
 Literacy across the curriculum
 Child/adolescent literature
 Literacy assessment linked to    • What theories &
  instruction                        research ground your
 Multiculturalism & education       beliefs?
 Educational research
WHOSE WORK, WHAT
  RESEARCH, WHAT THEORIES
 GROUND THE 5 TO 8 BELIEFS
YOU SKETCHED ABOUT LITERACY
   TEACHING & LEARNING?


 Literacy
 Language
 Culture
 Culturally responsive instruction
 What else?
As you advance your philosophy…
1. Review/re-read the academic papers and reflections you
   have written in the MA course work;

1. Then revisit the 5 to 8 beliefs you have generated, and add a
   statement to each one such as, “I feel that ___ is essential
   because…” and finish the statement by writing a paragraph
   about why you feel this is important to you and to your
   students’ learning.

2. Next, take these paragraphs and find the professional
   literature to back up your beliefs. You have been reading
   this literature and it has been influencing your thinking, now
   you need to put the two together.
Grounding the philosophy in
            theory & practice


You need to articulate in the philosophy that you
believe a practice is good for students because
theorists and researchers have demonstrated its
benefits and because of the effects you have
seen in the learning context with your own
students.

Next week…. Beliefs, 1 paragraph each, research
& theoretical underpinnings of each….
AS YOU REFLECT ON
          YOUR
  PHILOSOPHY, CONSIDE
  R WHAT YOU BELIEVE
    TO BE IMPORTANT
Where do you spend your time?

Where do your strengths lie?

Where does your practice match
closely with what you believe?

Where does your practice need some
fine-tuning?
Where does your practice need
                  some fine-tuning?
• What are you working on this year?
• What aspects of your instruction are you wanting/needing to
  improve in the areas of reading, writing, text, language?
For example:
Activating Ss’ schema?                 Asking Qs pre-during-post reading
Emphasizing vocabulary?                Using non-fiction text features
Asking quality questions of Ss?         Writing conventions
Emphasizing higher level thinking skills?
Determining importance?                 Literary features of sci-fi
Making inferences?                      Other?
Summarizing?
THINK ABOUT THIS!

 What aspect of your teaching
  would you like to share with
trusted colleagues who are also
        literacy experts?

        Coaching focus
Transitioning…to Knight’s work
We read in Knight’s text about these three
concepts:

•Coaching “light:” Building/maintaining
 relationships
•Coaching “heavy:” Planning powerful
 instruction
•Instructional coaching: Differentiated
 coaching/support with focus on research-
 based instructional practices
Chapter 2 on Instructional Coaching
Provides a preview to Knight’s “blue” text, “Instructional Coaching: A
Partnership Approach to Improving Instruction”


IC is grounded in the partnership philosophy (see theoretical
framework); Principles of Partnership Philosophy include:
Equality      Reflection         Dialogue
Choice        Praxis
Voice         Reciprocity

Where does instructional coaching begin?
Consider areas of teaching within what Knight calls “the big 4:”
classroom management               content
 instruction                      assessment for learning
You choose
Partner with 1 classmate & focus on 1 concept:

Coaching heavy; coaching light; or Instr. Coaching

1.   Describe the concept in your own words.
2.   What do you see as its advantages?
3.   What would you identify as potential disadvantages?
4.   Have you seen it implemented? How so?
5.   What is a lingering question you have about the
     concept?
SHARE OUT:
    QUICK SUMMARY
Brief description of concept
Advantages
Disadvantages
Implementations in your context
Lingering question
LCRT 6915, Week 3, Feb. 6th
TOPICS:             READINGS:               BRING OR DUE:
-Philosophy Paper   -Dagen & Nichols, ch.
Wkshp 1             2 “Teachers as          Bring: Philosophy belief
                    literacy leaders” pp.   statements (5-8) with 1
WRITING CENTER      21-41 (on ecollege in   paragraph typed
Overview: APA       doc sharing)            narrative grounding
Style, etc.                                 each belief & primary
                    -Knight (blue text)     resources noted.
-Debrief Dagen &    Ch. 1 “Why
Nichols ch. 2       coaching?” pp.1-18
                                            DUE:
                    & ch. 2 “What does
                                            -Instructional focus for
                    coaching look like?”
                                            6915 Coaching Sessions
                    pp. 19-33
                                            (1 paragraph, typed)
YOUR QUESTIONS?

Day 2 port philos rdg re coaching (6915)

  • 1.
    WELCOME TO LCRT6915: SEMINAR & PRACTICUM IN LITERACY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT January 30 th • Sign in attendance on the legal pad • Get a name tag • Find a place to sit & get comfortable • We will start at 5:00p.m. • Rebecca Schell, Academic Advisor, is with us tonight!
  • 2.
    Getting Information REBECCA SCHELL ACADEMIC ADVISOR FOR LLCRT STUDENT SERVICES SCHOOL OF EDUCATION & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
  • 3.
    • Graduation Application& Timeline • MA Portfolio (Philosophy Statement, MA Reflection, Livetext) • CU Email system is official mode of university-student communication • CDE Endorsement/PLACE Exam • Your questions?
  • 4.
    Getting Started onthe Philosophy Statement Many of you already have academic writings from LCRT courses that address key areas of the philosophy paper. E.g., writings on: • Writings about foundations of literacy & language (historical perspectives, foundational theory & research, perspectives about literacy & privilege, sociocultural perspectives on literacy, etc.) • Connections between language & literacy development (primary & K-12); • Writing development; reading development; • Linking assessment with instruction; • Connections between literacy & culture; • Supporting literacy & language learning with children’s & adolescent literature; • Think about the pieces of writing you can use or pull from.
  • 5.
    Getting Started onthe Philosophy (2) Consider aspects of literacy teaching and learning that are important to you. These may be general, such as The importance of using assessment to inform instruction; The importance of planning & delivering instruction that is responsive to students’ broad cultural backgrounds; or Learners’ language, learning & thinking are interrelated.
  • 6.
    Getting Started onthe Philosophy (3) Or, these aspects could be specific, such as The importance of small group instruction; or The importance of supporting learners’ in-class discussion about new content; or The importance of using formal & informal assessments.
  • 7.
    Getting Started onthe Philosophy (4) Your philosophy may include beliefs about teaching & learning that are not directly related to literacy, such as working with second language learners of English; teachers’ work to advocate for students & families;  providing students with choice; or including multiculturalism in your curriculum; Other?
  • 8.
    TAKE TIME INDIVIDUALLY: WHAT ARE 5 TO 8 OF YOUR BELIEFS ABOUT LITERACY TEACHING & LEARNING?  Literacy  Language  Culture  Culturally responsive instruction  What else?
  • 9.
    NOW CONSIDER THETHEORETICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF YOUR BELIEFS You’ve taken course work in : •Whose work have  Foundations of literacy, language & you read? culture  Literacy teaching & learning  Primary literacy • What is the research  Writing development process that grounds your  Language development practice?  Literacy across the curriculum  Child/adolescent literature  Literacy assessment linked to • What theories & instruction research ground your  Multiculturalism & education beliefs?  Educational research
  • 10.
    WHOSE WORK, WHAT RESEARCH, WHAT THEORIES GROUND THE 5 TO 8 BELIEFS YOU SKETCHED ABOUT LITERACY TEACHING & LEARNING?  Literacy  Language  Culture  Culturally responsive instruction  What else?
  • 11.
    As you advanceyour philosophy… 1. Review/re-read the academic papers and reflections you have written in the MA course work; 1. Then revisit the 5 to 8 beliefs you have generated, and add a statement to each one such as, “I feel that ___ is essential because…” and finish the statement by writing a paragraph about why you feel this is important to you and to your students’ learning. 2. Next, take these paragraphs and find the professional literature to back up your beliefs. You have been reading this literature and it has been influencing your thinking, now you need to put the two together.
  • 12.
    Grounding the philosophyin theory & practice You need to articulate in the philosophy that you believe a practice is good for students because theorists and researchers have demonstrated its benefits and because of the effects you have seen in the learning context with your own students. Next week…. Beliefs, 1 paragraph each, research & theoretical underpinnings of each….
  • 13.
    AS YOU REFLECTON YOUR PHILOSOPHY, CONSIDE R WHAT YOU BELIEVE TO BE IMPORTANT Where do you spend your time? Where do your strengths lie? Where does your practice match closely with what you believe? Where does your practice need some fine-tuning?
  • 14.
    Where does yourpractice need some fine-tuning? • What are you working on this year? • What aspects of your instruction are you wanting/needing to improve in the areas of reading, writing, text, language? For example: Activating Ss’ schema? Asking Qs pre-during-post reading Emphasizing vocabulary? Using non-fiction text features Asking quality questions of Ss? Writing conventions Emphasizing higher level thinking skills? Determining importance? Literary features of sci-fi Making inferences? Other? Summarizing?
  • 15.
    THINK ABOUT THIS! What aspect of your teaching would you like to share with trusted colleagues who are also literacy experts? Coaching focus
  • 16.
    Transitioning…to Knight’s work Weread in Knight’s text about these three concepts: •Coaching “light:” Building/maintaining relationships •Coaching “heavy:” Planning powerful instruction •Instructional coaching: Differentiated coaching/support with focus on research- based instructional practices
  • 17.
    Chapter 2 onInstructional Coaching Provides a preview to Knight’s “blue” text, “Instructional Coaching: A Partnership Approach to Improving Instruction” IC is grounded in the partnership philosophy (see theoretical framework); Principles of Partnership Philosophy include: Equality Reflection Dialogue Choice Praxis Voice Reciprocity Where does instructional coaching begin? Consider areas of teaching within what Knight calls “the big 4:” classroom management content instruction assessment for learning
  • 18.
    You choose Partner with1 classmate & focus on 1 concept: Coaching heavy; coaching light; or Instr. Coaching 1. Describe the concept in your own words. 2. What do you see as its advantages? 3. What would you identify as potential disadvantages? 4. Have you seen it implemented? How so? 5. What is a lingering question you have about the concept?
  • 19.
    SHARE OUT: QUICK SUMMARY Brief description of concept Advantages Disadvantages Implementations in your context Lingering question
  • 20.
    LCRT 6915, Week3, Feb. 6th TOPICS: READINGS: BRING OR DUE: -Philosophy Paper -Dagen & Nichols, ch. Wkshp 1 2 “Teachers as Bring: Philosophy belief literacy leaders” pp. statements (5-8) with 1 WRITING CENTER 21-41 (on ecollege in paragraph typed Overview: APA doc sharing) narrative grounding Style, etc. each belief & primary -Knight (blue text) resources noted. -Debrief Dagen & Ch. 1 “Why Nichols ch. 2 coaching?” pp.1-18 DUE: & ch. 2 “What does -Instructional focus for coaching look like?” 6915 Coaching Sessions pp. 19-33 (1 paragraph, typed)
  • 21.

Editor's Notes

  • #9 INDIVIDUAL BRAINSTORM – THEN Share out with 1-2 individuals
  • #11 INDIVIDUAL BRAINSTORM – THEN Share out with 1-2 individuals
  • #14 This reflection links to the “instructional focus” that students need to identify for the coaching sessions. FOR EXAMPLE... SVT….. A goal I have set for my own instruction this semester is to expand/improve my use of text-based discussion protocols. Belief.. Language & thinking linked, Ss need to talk about what they are learning, structuring discussion is important!!!!!!!!!