The document discusses various topics related to critical thinking, logic, argumentation, and decision making. It provides definitions of key concepts, examples to illustrate ideas, and tips or guidelines related to improving thinking skills, making effective presentations, analyzing arguments, and making creative and effective decisions. The document is a presentation that aims to enhance understanding of important thinking skills and logical reasoning.
Logical Reasoning: relevance, obstacles and structureNGANG PEREZ
The definition of logic could be stated as the science of reasoning, proof, thinking or inference (according to the Oxford Compact English Dictionary). It is the ability to reason that is central to logical thinking. For many of us, these reasoning skills are often put to the test during arguments. Being able to reason is clearly a valuable skill! But is it something that we should be "teaching"? Do students learn how to form logical arguments within the home? Do fellow teachers encourage their students to think logically? Or do we compel the students to “give back our notes (cram work)” during exams? To what extend do tutor facilitate students to think out of the box (class notes?). This is something very critical and we shall see its importance in this chapter as well as the obstacles and structure.
Logical Reasoning: relevance, obstacles and structureNGANG PEREZ
The definition of logic could be stated as the science of reasoning, proof, thinking or inference (according to the Oxford Compact English Dictionary). It is the ability to reason that is central to logical thinking. For many of us, these reasoning skills are often put to the test during arguments. Being able to reason is clearly a valuable skill! But is it something that we should be "teaching"? Do students learn how to form logical arguments within the home? Do fellow teachers encourage their students to think logically? Or do we compel the students to “give back our notes (cram work)” during exams? To what extend do tutor facilitate students to think out of the box (class notes?). This is something very critical and we shall see its importance in this chapter as well as the obstacles and structure.
Ms 95 - research methodology for management decisionssmumbahelp
Dear students get fully solved assignments
Send your semester & Specialization name to our mail id :
help.mbaassignments@gmail.com
or
call us at : 08263069601
A hypothesis is the translation of the information that we are keen on. Utilizing Hypothesis Testing, we attempt to decipher or reach inferences about the populace utilizing test information. A Hypothesis assesses two totally unrelated articulations about a populace to figure out which explanation is best upheld by the example information.
Ms 95 - research methodology for management decisionssmumbahelp
Dear students get fully solved assignments
Send your semester & Specialization name to our mail id :
help.mbaassignments@gmail.com
or
call us at : 08263069601
A hypothesis is the translation of the information that we are keen on. Utilizing Hypothesis Testing, we attempt to decipher or reach inferences about the populace utilizing test information. A Hypothesis assesses two totally unrelated articulations about a populace to figure out which explanation is best upheld by the example information.
Research methodology /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental ac...Indian dental academy
The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.
Indian dental academy provides dental crown & Bridge,rotary endodontics,fixed orthodontics,
Dental implants courses.for details pls visit www.indiandentalacademy.com ,or call
0091-9248678078
LaneThinking about Thinking Using the Elements of Thoug.docxsmile790243
Lane
Thinking about Thinking:
Using the Elements of Thought to
Determine the Logic of _____
Assess your writing
Assess someone else’s writing
Assess or evaluate _________
The elements of thought are...
Purpose of
the
Thinking
goal, objective
Concepts
theories,
definitions,
axioms, laws,
principles,
models
Assumptions
Information
data, facts,
observations,
experiences
Points of
View
frame
of reference,
perspective,
orentation
Question at
issue
problem
Interpretation &
Inference
conclusions, solutions
Consequences
and
Implications
THINKING ABOUT THINKING
How can we know what to believe when the facts are confusing and experts disagree? As you learn about environmental science-in this book and elsewhere-you will find many issues about which the data are indecisive, leading reasonable people to disagree on how they should be interpreted. How can we choose between competing claims? Is it simply a matter of what feels good at any particular moment, or are there objective ways to evaluate arguments? Critical thinking skills can help us form a rational basis for deciding what to believe and do. These skills foster reflective and systematic analysis to help us bring order out of chaos, discover hidden ideas and meanings, develop strategies for evaluating reasons and conclusions in arguments, and avoid jumping to conclusions. Developing rational analytic skills is an important part of your education and will give you useful tools for life.
Certain attitudes, tendencies and dispositions are essential for critical or reflective thinking. Among these are;
· Skepticism and independence. Question authority. Don't believe everything you hear or read, including this book. Even the experts can be wrong.
· Open-mindedness and flexibility. Be willing to consider differing points of view and entertain alternative explanations.
· Accuracy and orderliness. Strive for as much precision as the subject permits or warrants. Deal systematically with parts of a complex whole.
· Persistence and relevance. Stick to the main point and avoid allowing diversions or personal biases to lead you astray.
· Contextual sensitivity and empathy. Consider the total situation, feelings, level of knowledge, and sophistication of others as you study situations. Try and put yourself in another person's place to understand his or her position.
· Decisiveness and courage. Draw conclusions and take a stand when the evidence warrants doing so.
· Humility. Realize that you may be wrong and that you may have to reconsider in the future.
Critical thinking is sometimes called metacognition or "thinking about thinking." It is not critical in the sense of finding fault but rather is an attempt to rationally plan how to think about a problem. It requires a self-conscious monitoring of the process while you are doing it and an evaluation of how your strategy worked and what you learned when you have finished. Assembling, understanding, and evaluat ...
Critical and Analytical ThinkingCritical thinkin.docxannettsparrow
Critical and Analytical Thinking
Critical thinkingWord ‘critical’ has positive and negative meaningsThe word ‘critical’ in academia describes your attitude when reading an article/chapterBeing critical means weighing up the arguments for and against a particular point.
*
Not just the bad parts
How to think criticallyBe persistent – consider an issue carefully more than onceLook at the evidence for a viewpoint – evaluate it – what are they trying to ‘sell’ me?What are the implications of a view point – is it realistic and rational?Knowing facts and what is right is not what academics is aboutIt is important to identify strengths, satisfactory points and weaknesses when being critical – then you must know why this is soYou should be critical when reading, writing and listening
*
Need to fully understand an argument before you can be critical – be confident
Evaluate=what is the value/effectiveness of something, inc. own opinion and supporting each point with evidence
Question the credibility
You are just assessing ideas not learning the answers
Only want informed opinions
Analytical thinkingBeing analytical mean to look deeper into what is being saidDo not take what you read as ‘given’Evaluate what is being argued – do you agree with it?To be analytical is to question what you read
*
Not just reading what is said but ‘thinking’ about it
How to think analyticallyThink about the view point in relation to the bigger picture – stand backCompare the same issue from the point of other authors – do their views differ?Should be able to see why authors have arrived at different conclusionsYou should be able to argue why you think one set of view points is preferable to anotherYou should be analytical when reading, writing and listening
*
Think about your readings together, put into context
You should be asking why a conclusion has been made – need full understanding for this
Barriers to critical and analytical thinkingBeing critical does not just mean criticiseOur reasoning skills are not objective – we are biased ourselvesReluctance to criticise expertsWanting to know what is right and wrongNot reading deeply enough around a subject – surface knowledge
*
Not always black and white there are lots of grey areas in academics
Being analytical and critical is hard work, you have to read carefully and widely
Critical and analytical readingPrepare for critical reading – skim read the introduction and conclusionFind the conclusions first to help clarify the rest of the readingWhat is the underlying argument/ view point?Question hidden agendas or assumptionsTheory can help fill in the gaps – what is theory?
- set of ideas to explain why something happens and predict outcomes in the futureArguments are often based on theory but an argument is not always a theory
Critical and analytical readingWhere is the evidence for a view point?Check references – are they presented accurately and are they credible? - evaluate that evidence –.
PHIL 2306 Intro. to Ethics Components of an Argument Pro.docxmattjtoni51554
PHIL 2306: Intro. to Ethics
Components of an Argument
Professor J. Welsh
Components of an Argument:
An argument is made up of two or more propositions, one of which is claimed to be supported by the
other.
A proposition, in logic, is a statement that expresses a complete thought. Propositions can be true or
false, and the same proposition can be stated in different ways.
example:
“Torturing children is wrong” is the same content as “It is wrong to torture children”
There are two types of propositions:
conclusions—a proposition that is affirmed or denied on the basis of the other propositions.
premise—a proposition that provides reasons or support for the conclusion.
An argument can have more than one premise.
Once a conclusion is established with premises, it is sometimes then used as a premise to establish
the soundness of another conclusion.
The process by which we move from the premise(s) to the conclusion(s) is known as inference:
Inference: Draws a conclusion on the basis of certain evidence. Inference is only justified if the
evidence is related to the conclusion in the right way. Logic is what identifies how evidence and
conclusions must be related in order for us to claim that the evidence supports the conclusion.
Therefore, you find that the foundation of the argument are the premises.
In a good argument, the premises must be strong enough to support the conclusion and withstand
challenges.
Ethical arguments may contain different types of propositions as premises:
descriptive statements—tell us what is.
prescriptive statements—tell us what ought to be; that is, they deal with values. Normative
judgments and moral principles are prescriptive statements.
definitions—sometimes premises are merely definitions of key terms that may otherwise be
ambiguous, due to having different possible meanings.
analogies—a comparison based upon similarities between two things or events . In logic, analogies
are used to support the conclusion that because things are similar in some important respects,
they are also similar in other respects.
Rhetoric vs. Logical Argumentation:
We distinguish logical argument from what is called rhetoric.
Rhetoric is a means of defending a particular worldview or opinion, rather than analyzing it.
In logical arguments we end with the conclusion; whereas with rhetoric begins with a “pseudo-
conclusion” or opinion.
A rhetorician is distinguished by their using only those statements that support their particular
position, disregarding any statements or facts that do not.
The purpose of rhetoric is to win your opponents over to your view through the power of
persuasive speech, whereas we say that the purpose of a logical argument is to discover the
truth.
Analyzing Arguments:
We analyze arguments, first, by breaking down the argument into premises and conclusion.
One page 51 in the textbook, Bos.
Is your favorite ring slipping and sliding on your finger? You're not alone. Must Read this Guide on What To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big as shared by the experts of Andrews Jewelers.
La transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les FrançaisIpsos France
Ipsos, l’une des principales sociétés mondiales d’études de marché dévoile les résultats de son étude Ipsos Global Advisor “Pride 2024”. De ses débuts aux Etats-Unis et désormais dans de très nombreux pays, le mois de juin est traditionnellement consacré aux « Marches des Fiertés » et à des événements festifs autour du concept de Pride. A cette occasion, Ipsos a réalisé une enquête dans vingt-six pays dressant plusieurs constats. Les clivages des opinions entre générations s’accentuent tandis que le soutien à des mesures sociétales et d’inclusion en faveur des LGBT+ notamment transgenres continue de s’effriter.
What Makes Candle Making The Ultimate Bachelorette CelebrationWick & Pour
The above-discussed factors are the reason behind an increasing number of millennials opting for candle making events to celebrate their bachelorette. If you are in search of any theme for your bachelorette then do opt for a candle making session to make your celebration memorable for everyone involved.
From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...Kitchen on Fire
Discover how Oakland's innovative corporate wellness initiatives are transforming workplace culture, nurturing the well-being of employees, and fostering a thriving environment. From comprehensive mental health support to flexible work arrangements and holistic wellness workshops, these programs are empowering individuals to navigate stress effectively, leading to increased productivity, satisfaction, and overall success.
Johnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the Yearsgreendigital
Johnny Depp, synonymous with eclectic roles and unparalleled acting prowess. has also been a significant figure in fashion and style. Johnny Depp long hair is a distinctive trademark among the various elements that define his unique persona. This article delves into the evolution, impact. and cultural significance of Johnny Depp long hair. exploring how it has contributed to his iconic status.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Johnny Depp is an actor known for his chameleon-like ability to transform into a wide range of characters. from the eccentric Captain Jack Sparrow in "Pirates of the Caribbean" to the introspective Edward Scissorhands. His long hair is one constant throughout his evolving roles and public appearances. Johnny Depp long hair is not a style choice but a significant aspect of his identity. contributing to his allure and mystique. This article explores the journey and significance of Johnny Depp long hair. highlighting how it has become integral to his brand.
The Early Years: A Budding Star with Signature Locks
1980s: The Rise of a Young Heartthrob
Johnny Depp's journey in Hollywood began in the 1980s. with his breakout role in the television series "21 Jump Street." During this time, his hair was short, but it was already clear that Depp had a penchant for unique and edgy styles. By the decade's end, Depp started experimenting with longer hair. setting the stage for a lifelong signature.
1990s: From Heartthrob to Icon
The 1990s were transformative for Johnny Depp his career and personal style. Films like "Edward Scissorhands" (1990) and "Benny & Joon" (1993) saw Depp sporting various hair lengths and styles. But, his long, unkempt hair in "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" (1993) began to draw significant attention. This period marked the beginning of Johnny Depp long hair. which became a defining feature of his image.
The Iconic Roles: Hair as a Character Element
Edward Scissorhands (1990)
In "Edward Scissorhands," Johnny Depp's character had a wild and mane that complemented his ethereal and misunderstood persona. This role showcased how long hair Johnny Depp could enhance a character's depth and mystery.
Captain Jack Sparrow: The Pirate with Flowing Locks
One of Johnny Depp's iconic roles is Captain Jack Sparrow from the "Pirates of the Caribbean" series. Sparrow's long, dreadlocked hair symbolised his rebellious and unpredictable nature. The character's look, complete with beads and trinkets woven into his hair. was a collaboration between Depp and the film's costume designers. This style became iconic and influenced fashion trends and Halloween costumes worldwide.
Other Memorable Characters
Depp's long hair has also been featured in other roles, such as Ichabod Crane in "Sleepy Hollow" (1999). and Roux in "Chocolat" (2000). In these films, his hair added a layer of authenticity and depth to his characters. proving that Johnny Depp with long hair is more than a style—it's a storytelling tool.
Off-Screen Influenc
2. Thinking skills in the age of globalization
Globalization is changing the way we work and live.
Globalization brings about an ever quickening pace of life.
Critical thinking skill and creativity.
Become a critical thinker and solve problems.
3. Ways to improve critical thinking
Learning the theory
Deliberate practice
Developing right attitude
Developing theoretical knowledge and actual ability
4. Key questions to think about ?
What does it
mean ?
How many
supporting
reasons and
objectives?
Why is it
important or
relevant?
Which are the other
possibilities to consider ?
5. 5 Tips to make an effective presentation
Know
your
audience
What is
your
central
message &
why is it
important?
Organize
the ideas
Be
simple
and
direct
Rewrite,
rewrite
and
rewrite
7. Different types of definition
1
•Reportive definition
2
•Stipulative definition
3
•Precising definition
8. Ways to provide a meaningful definition
Avoid verbal
and factual
dispute
Avoid
circular
definition
Avoid
obscurity
Avoid
persuasive
definitions
9. •Definition of truth by , Aristotles
To say of what is that it is not ,or of what is not that it is , is
false , while
To say of what is that it is , and of what is not that it is not , is
true.
Truth
10. •Analytical truth :- statement that is true in virtue of meaning of words
contained in the statement
•Empirical truth :- depends on contingent facts about the world fact that could
have been different if the history and physical laws of universe had been any
difference
•Value truth :- is one about what is to be good or bad , what is morally right
or wrong , or what we should or should not do
Types of truth
11. •The core of logic is about consistency and deduction. It also
plays a special role in computer technology , as computers are
good at processing information because there processors can
perform a huge no. of logical information
Basic logic
12. An argument is a list of statements, one of which is the
conclusion and the others are the assumptions of the
argument. For example, it is raining so you should bring an
umbrella
Argument
13. Consistency:- a statement is consistent when and only when it is
logically possible for all of them to be true in same situation otherwise
its inconsistent
Entailment:- if p1…..pn are all true then Q must also be true
logical equivalence :- if P entails Q and Q entails P then P and Q
are logically equivalent.
Concepts of logics
14. •An argument is valid if and only if there is no logically possible
situation in which the premises are true and the conclusion is false
•If an argument is valid and all the premises are true then it is called
sound argument. An argument that is not sound is unsound.
Validity and soundness
15. Argument mapping is a way to visually show the logical structure of arguments.
The purpose of mapping is to uncover the logical structure of arguments, identify
unstated assumptions, evaluate the support an argument offers for a conclusion,
and aid understanding of debates.
Co premises are premises that work together to form a single argument for a
conclusion, where as independent premises offer distinct reasons for accepting the
conclusion.
Objections represent opposing arguments from different slides.
Argument Mapping
16. What is good argument ?
The premises are true or highly plausible.
The argument is deductively valid or inductively strong.
The premises are not question-begging.
All the premises are relevant to the conclusion.
Four ways to attack an argument
1. Attack the premises.
2. Attack the reasoning.
3. Attack the arguments indirectly by attacking the
conclusion.
4. Give an analogous arguments that is obviously bad.
Argument Analysis
17. Noteworthy features-based on evidence; hypothesis testing is fallible.
Steps in Hypothesis testing:
a. Define the hypothesis to be tested.
b. Collect the evidence for an against the hypothesis.
c. List all the alternative hypothesis.
d. Rank them and pick the best one to accept.
Mechanism is related to truthfulness.
Two kinds of Coherence:
a. Logically consistent-a theory should be internally coherent.
b. Good theories should be consistent with other well-confirmed theories and facts.
Hypothesis-Core of scientific methodology
18. The method of
agreement
The method of
concomitant
variations
The method of
residues
The joint method
Mill’s
Methods
Limitations:
1. The two cause might not be any of the
candidate causes.
2. The effect might have more than one cause.
3. Causation can be in deterministic.
Mill’s Methods
19. Good evidence for causation
Accidental Correlation
The Causal direction is reversed
Hidden common causes
A caution due to side effect
Look for reliable model of causal
mechanism
Look for covariation and
manipulability
Causation is complicated
Causes delevance
casually necessary & sufficient
Conditions
Triggers
Proximity
Randomness & casual determinace
Why correlation is not causation ?
24. Flow Chart
A flow chart is a diagram of the sequence of movements or actions of people or things
involved in a complex system or activity.
The example below describes how a busy person ruthlessly deals with the flood of emails
in his inbox: Start
Important
Urgent
Reply Immediately
End
End
End
Reply later
Delete
25. Fallacies
A fallacy is an argument that uses poor reasoning.
An argument can be fallacious whether or not its conclusion is true.
A fallacy can be either formal or informal.
Formal Fallacy: An error that stems from a poor logical form is sometimes called
a formal fallacy or simply an invalid argument.
Informal fallacy: It is an error in reasoning that does not originate in improper
logical form.
26. Cognitive biases is a common tendency to acquire and process information by
filtering it through one's own likes, dislikes, and experiences.
TYPES:
1. Memory Biases
2. Context Biases
3. Ego Biases
Cognitive Biases
27. Analogical Reasoning
Is a method of processing information that compares similarities and understood concepts.
It is form of inductive reasoning
Evaluating analogical arguments
Truth
Relevance
Number & Diversity
Disanalogy
28. 1
• Think generally about how the decision should be made.
• Do some research
2
• Come up with a list of options.
• Evaluate their props and cons & pick the best option.
3
• Prepare for contingencies.
• Monitor progress and learn from results.
29. Typical Problems In Decision Making
Plunging in
No system
Decision paralysis and procrastition
Failure to execute
Framing bias
Over confidence
No learning
Sour grapes mentality
Obession with some cost
31. Brain Storming and Group Creativity
Brain storming is a method for generating ideas in a group. It was 1st popularized by
Alex Osborn, an advertising executive around 1950’s.
Factors that diminish the
effectiveness of brain storming:
Problem of production
blocking
Group thinking
Measures that might be useful for more effective
brain storming:
An impartial group leader to structure the
discussion without introducing biases
A devil’s advocate to challenge assumptions
Consultations with outside experts