This document provides a critical analysis of two research articles that use different methodologies and paradigms. The first article uses quantitative methods and a post-positivistic paradigm, while the second uses qualitative methods and a constructivist paradigm. Each article is analyzed based on its methodology, research questions, theoretical frameworks, definitions, limitations, significance, methods and procedures, quality and rigor, and researcher positionality. The analysis finds that while the articles have different purposes, they both fit within the conceptual frameworks of their respective fields.