SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 38
Department of Civil Engineering
Welcome To Our Presentation
TOPIC OF OUR PRESENTATION:
“Effect of different proportions of Local & Sylhet
sand on compressive strength of concrete”
1
Presented By:
Name ID
01. Kawshik Ahmed 180119021
02. Md. Mahfuz Bin Hamid 160119016
03. Moshiur Rahman 180119042
04. Murari Mohan Biswas 150119002
Supervisor:
Md. Menaz
Senior Lecturer
Dept. of Civil Engineering, EUB
2
 Objectives
 Material Properties
 Methodology
 Test Results & Data Analysis
 Conclusion
Table of Contents:
3
 To observe the compressive strength of concrete made of
Sylhet Sand.
 To observe the compressive strength of concrete made of
Local Sand.
 To observe the compressive strength of concrete made of
different proportions of Local sand & Sylhet sand.
 To compare the compressive strength and to determine the
economic Local & Sylhet sand ratio which give the best
performance.
Objectives:
4
 CEMENT:
In our thesis we used Scan Cement for all casting work. This cement contains
clinker, gypsum, fly ash, slag, lime stone and others.
Material Properties:
Ingredients Percentage of
ingredients
Clinker 65-79%
Slag, Fly Ash, Lime
Stone
21-35%
Gypsum 0-5%
Table: Cement ingredients and their percentage
5
 FINE AGGREGATE:
In our thesis we used two types of fine aggregate. One is Local Sand and another
is Sylhet Sand.
Material Properties:
6
Local SandSylhet Sand
Material Properties:
7
Sieve Analysis Test of Fine Aggregate
8
Material Properties:
Total weight of fine aggregates(Local sand)=1000gm
Siev
e
No.
Sieve
Size (mm)
Weight
Retained
(gm)
% Retained Cumulative %
of Retained
% Finer FM
4 4.75 0 0 0 100
8 2.36 1 .10 .10 99.90
16 1.18 3 .30 .40 99.60
30 0.6 34 3.4 3.80 96.60 1.90
50 0.3 842 84.20 88.00 12.00
100 0.15 99 9.90 97.90 2.10
pan 21 2.10 100 0
Total 190.20
Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate (Local Sand)
Material Properties:
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.1 1 10
% Finer
Sieve Size (mm)
Gradation Graph of Fine Aggregate (Local Sand)
9
Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate (Sylhet Sand)
Material Properties:
Total weight of fine aggregates(Sylhet sand)=1000gm
Sieve
No.
Sieve
Size (mm)
Weight
Retained
(gm)
% Retained Cumulative
% of Retained
% Finer FM
4 4.75 0 0 0 100
8 2.36 52 5.20 5.20 94.80
16 1.18 253 25.30 30.50 69.50
30 0.6 394 39.40 69.90 30.10 2.90
50 0.3 178 17.80 87.70 12.30
100 0.15 98 9.80 97.50 2.50
pan 25 2.50 100 0
Total 290.80
10
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.1 1 10
% Finer
Sieve Size (mm)
Gradation Graph of Fine Aggregate (Sylhet Sand)
Material Properties:
11
12
Material Properties:
Sieve Analysis Test of Coarse Aggregate
 COARSE AGGREAGTE:
Sieve Analysis of Coarse Aggregate (Brick Chips)
Material Properties:
Total weight of coarse aggregates(Brick chips)=3000gm
Sieve
No.
Sieve
Size (mm)
Weight
Retained
(gm)
% Retained
(gm)
Cumulative %
of Retained
% Finer FM
2(1/2)” 63 0 0 0 100
1(1/2)” 37.5 0 0 0 100
3/4” 19 1978 65.93 65.93 34.07
3/8” 9.5 979 32.63 98.56 1.44
4 4.75 31 1.03 99.56 0.44
8 2.63 6 0.2 99.79 0.21 7.63
16 1.18 2 0.06 99.85 0.15
30 0.6 0 0 99.85 0.15
50 0.3 0 0 99.85 0.15
100 0.15 0 0 99.85 0.15
pan 4 0.13 99.98 0.02
Total 763.24
13
Material Properties:
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.1 1 10 100
% Finer
Sieve Size (mm)
Gradation Graph of Coarse Aggregate (Brick Chips)
14
 Water Absorption Capacity of Coarse Aggregate:
Material Properties:
Wet Weight after 24 hours
Immersion= 5792 gm
Oven Dry Weight after 24 hours = 5214 gm
Water Absorption Capacity
= [(5792-5214)/5214]X 100
=11.08 %
15
Material Properties:
Water Absorption Test of Coarse Aggregate
16
Concrete Mix Ratio = 1:1.5:3
W/C Ratio= 0.5
Number of Cylinder= 45 (D=4”,H=8”)
Mix Design Table
 SS 100 = 100% Sylhet Sand & 0% Local Sand.
 SS 75 = 75% Sylhet Sand & 25% Local Sand.
 SS 50 = 50% Sylhet Sand & 50% Local Sand.
 SS 25 = 25% Sylhet Sand & 75% Local Sand.
 SS 00 = 0% Sylhet Sand & 100% Local Sand.
17
Methodology:
Specimen
ID
Cement
Sand
Brick Chips Water
Sylhet Local
SS 100 6kg 9kg 0kg 18kg 2.7kg
SS 75 6kg 6.75kg 2.25kg 18kg 2.7kg
SS 50 6kg 4.5kg 4.5kg 18kg 2.7kg
SS 25 6kg 2.25kg 6.75kg 18kg 2.7kg
SS 0 6kg 0kg 9kg 18kg 2.7kg
18
Fine Aggregate, Coarse Aggregate & Cement Used for
Concrete Casting
Methodology:
19
Methodology:
Concrete Mixing and Cylindrical Specimens Preparation
20
Methodology:
Concrete Mixing and Cylindrical Specimens Preparation
21
Methodology:
Marking and Demoulding of Specimens & Prepared for Curing
22
Methodology:
Compressive Strength Test in Universal Testing Machine (UTM)
23
Test Results & Data Analysis:
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (7 Days)
Types of
Specimen
Sample No. Load (KN)
Compressive
Strength (Mpa)
Average
Compressive
Strength (Mpa)
Average Compressive
Strength (Psi)
SS 100
1 108 13.3
13.32 1931.42 110 13.58
3 106 13.08
SS 75
1 100 12.34
12.09 1753.052 92 11.35
3 102 12.6
SS 50
1 85 10.49
10.08 1461.62 82 10.12
3 78 9.63
SS 25
1 77 9.5
9.5 1377.52 80 9.88
3 74 9.13
SS 00
1 76 9.38
8.76 1270.22 67 8.27
3 70 8.64
24
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Comparison of Compressive Strength (7 Days)
1931.4
1753.05
1461.6
1377.5
1270.2
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
SS 100 SS 75 SS 50 SS 25 SS 00
CompressiveStrength(Psi)
Sample ID Based on % of Sylhet Sand
25
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Types of
Specimen
Sample No. Load (KN)
Compressive
Strength (Mpa)
Average
Compressive
Strength (Mpa)
Average Compressive
Strength (Psi)
SS 100
1 163 20.12
20.37 2953.652 170 20.99
3 162 20
SS 75
1 157 19.38
18.89 2739.052 150 18.52
3 152 18.77
SS 50
1 138 17.03
17.25 2501.252 136 16.8
3 140 17.29
SS 25
1 124 15.3
15.43 2237.352 128 15.8
3 123 15.18
SS 00
1 110 13.58
12.92 1873.42 104 12.83
3 100 12.35
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (14 Days)
26
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Comparison of Compressive Strength (14 Days)
2953.65
2739.05
2501.25
2237.35
1873.4
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
SS 100 SS 75 SS 50 SS 25 SS 00
CompressiveStrength(Psi)
Sample ID Based on % of Sylhet Sand
27
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Types of
Specimen
Sample No. Load (KN)
Compressive
Strength (Mpa)
Average
Compressive
Strength (Mpa)
Average Compressive
Strength (Psi)
SS 100
1 205 25.31
24.94 3616.32 198 24.44
3 203 25.06
SS 75
1 186 22.84
22.59 3275.552 178 21.97
3 186 22.96
SS 50
1 165 20.74
20.12 2917.42 158 19.5
3 163 20.12
SS 25
1 154 19.01
19.17 2779.652 160 19.75
3 152 18.76
SS 00
1 135 16.66
16.42 2380.92 136 16.8
3 128 15.8
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (28 Days)
28
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Comparison of Compressive Strength (28 Days)
3616.3
3275.55
2917.4
2779.65
2380.9
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
SS 100 SS 75 SS 50 SS 25 SS 00
CompressiveStrength(Psi)
Sample ID Based on % of Sylhet Sand
29
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS100
(7, 14 & 28 Days)
1931.4
2953.65
3616.3
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
7 14 28
CompressiveStrength(Psi)
Days
30
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS75
(7, 14 & 28 Days)
1753.05
2739.05
3275.55
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
7 14 28
CompressiveStrength(Psi)
Days
31
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS50
(7, 14 & 28 Days)
1461.6
2501.25
2917.4
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
7 14 28
CompressiveStrength(Psi)
Days
32
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS25
(7, 14 & 28 Days)
1377.5
2237.35
2779.65
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
7 14 28
CompressiveStrength(Psi)
Days
33
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS00
(7, 14 & 28 Days)
1270.2
1873.4
2380.9
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
7 14 28
CompressiveStrength(Psi)
Days
34
Test Results & Data Analysis:
Comparison of Compressive Strength for Different
Proportions of Sylhet and Local Sand
1931.4
1753.05
1416.6 1377.5
1270.2
2953.65
2739.05
2501.25
2237.35
1873.4
3616.3
3275.55
2917.4
2779.65
2380.9
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
SS 100 SS 75 SS 50 SS 25 SS 00
CompressiveStrength(Psi)
Sample ID Based on % of Sylhet Sand
7 Days
14 Days
28 Days
35
Cost Analysis:
Sample Cost Per m3
SS100 435.63tk
SS75 423.46tk
SS50 411.30tk
SS25 399.13tk
SS00 386.96tk
*Excluding labor & transportation cost
36
Conclusion:
 It has been observed that compressive strength of SS100(100% Sylhet
Sand) is maximum for 7, 14 and 28 days.
 It has been observed that compressive strength of SS00(0% Sylhet Sand)
is minimum for 7, 14 and 28 days.
 For 28 days, Compressive strength of SS75 is 9.42% less than SS100.
Compressive strength of SS50 is 19.33% less than SS100. Compressive
strength of SS25 is 23.14% less than SS100. And Compressive strength of
SS00 is 34.16% less than SS100.
 For 14 days, Compressive strength of SS75 is 7.26% less than SS100.
Compressive strength of SS50 is 15.32% less than SS100. Compressive
strength of SS25 is 24.25% less than SS100. And Compressive strength of
SS00 is 36.57% less than SS100.
37
Conclusion:
 For 7 days, Compressive strength of SS75 is 9.23% less than SS100.
Compressive strength of SS50 is 26.65% less than SS100. Compressive
strength of SS25 is 28.68% less than SS100. And Compressive strength
of SS00 is 34.23% less than SS100.
 By evaluating and comparing the results, it may be suggested that
local sand up to 50% may be used with Sylhet sand for economic
purpose.
38

More Related Content

What's hot

Ppt sieve analysis
Ppt sieve analysisPpt sieve analysis
Ppt sieve analysis
Manoj Kumar
 
20320140507002
2032014050700220320140507002
20320140507002
IAEME Publication
 

What's hot (18)

Suitability of Umuahia Sand for Field Compaction Quality Control: A Mechanica...
Suitability of Umuahia Sand for Field Compaction Quality Control: A Mechanica...Suitability of Umuahia Sand for Field Compaction Quality Control: A Mechanica...
Suitability of Umuahia Sand for Field Compaction Quality Control: A Mechanica...
 
Quantity notes by engineer saqb imran
Quantity notes by engineer saqb imranQuantity notes by engineer saqb imran
Quantity notes by engineer saqb imran
 
IRJET - Experimental Study on Properties of Soil
IRJET - Experimental Study on Properties of SoilIRJET - Experimental Study on Properties of Soil
IRJET - Experimental Study on Properties of Soil
 
Core cutter method
Core cutter methodCore cutter method
Core cutter method
 
Sieve analysis for Soil
Sieve analysis for SoilSieve analysis for Soil
Sieve analysis for Soil
 
371hw07s
371hw07s371hw07s
371hw07s
 
Min and Max Density of soil
Min and Max Density of soilMin and Max Density of soil
Min and Max Density of soil
 
Ppt sieve analysis
Ppt sieve analysisPpt sieve analysis
Ppt sieve analysis
 
Determination grain size distribution of soil
Determination grain size distribution of soilDetermination grain size distribution of soil
Determination grain size distribution of soil
 
Sieve analysis test report
Sieve analysis test reportSieve analysis test report
Sieve analysis test report
 
Kamal
KamalKamal
Kamal
 
20320140507002
2032014050700220320140507002
20320140507002
 
DSD-NL 2018 Simulation of Installation of Monopiles using MPM - Elkadi
DSD-NL 2018 Simulation of Installation of Monopiles using MPM - ElkadiDSD-NL 2018 Simulation of Installation of Monopiles using MPM - Elkadi
DSD-NL 2018 Simulation of Installation of Monopiles using MPM - Elkadi
 
Atterberg Limits Test
Atterberg Limits TestAtterberg Limits Test
Atterberg Limits Test
 
Numerical problem on concrete mix design by is 10262(2009) method
Numerical problem on concrete mix design by is 10262(2009) methodNumerical problem on concrete mix design by is 10262(2009) method
Numerical problem on concrete mix design by is 10262(2009) method
 
soil classification lab
soil classification labsoil classification lab
soil classification lab
 
Experimental Investigation of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag ond Quarry Dust a...
Experimental Investigation of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag ond Quarry Dust a...Experimental Investigation of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag ond Quarry Dust a...
Experimental Investigation of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag ond Quarry Dust a...
 
Index property
Index propertyIndex property
Index property
 

Similar to Concrete Mix design

REPLACEMENT OF BRICKS WITH PLASTIC BOTTLE IN MANARYSO NEW Monit.pptx
REPLACEMENT OF BRICKS WITH PLASTIC BOTTLE  IN MANARYSO NEW Monit.pptxREPLACEMENT OF BRICKS WITH PLASTIC BOTTLE  IN MANARYSO NEW Monit.pptx
REPLACEMENT OF BRICKS WITH PLASTIC BOTTLE IN MANARYSO NEW Monit.pptx
MonitMIstry1
 
The effect of groundnut shell ash & glass dust on concrete strength- final.pptx
The effect of groundnut shell ash & glass dust on concrete strength- final.pptxThe effect of groundnut shell ash & glass dust on concrete strength- final.pptx
The effect of groundnut shell ash & glass dust on concrete strength- final.pptx
MdSherekulIslam1
 

Similar to Concrete Mix design (20)

REPLACEMENT OF BRICKS WITH PLASTIC BOTTLE IN MANARYSO NEW Monit.pptx
REPLACEMENT OF BRICKS WITH PLASTIC BOTTLE  IN MANARYSO NEW Monit.pptxREPLACEMENT OF BRICKS WITH PLASTIC BOTTLE  IN MANARYSO NEW Monit.pptx
REPLACEMENT OF BRICKS WITH PLASTIC BOTTLE IN MANARYSO NEW Monit.pptx
 
Effect of Waste Foundry Sand on Durability Properties of Concrete
Effect of Waste Foundry Sand on Durability Properties of ConcreteEffect of Waste Foundry Sand on Durability Properties of Concrete
Effect of Waste Foundry Sand on Durability Properties of Concrete
 
Civil standard notes
Civil standard notesCivil standard notes
Civil standard notes
 
Civil book
Civil bookCivil book
Civil book
 
Civil guide
Civil guideCivil guide
Civil guide
 
civil datas for estimate
civil datas for estimatecivil datas for estimate
civil datas for estimate
 
An Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Sugarcane Bagasse...
An Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Sugarcane Bagasse...An Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Sugarcane Bagasse...
An Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Sugarcane Bagasse...
 
geopolymer concrete
geopolymer concretegeopolymer concrete
geopolymer concrete
 
MINOR REPORT - To understand the behavior of strength and workability by cha...
MINOR REPORT - To understand the behavior of strength and workability  by cha...MINOR REPORT - To understand the behavior of strength and workability  by cha...
MINOR REPORT - To understand the behavior of strength and workability by cha...
 
Aninvestigation into the effects of water containated with chloride salts on ...
Aninvestigation into the effects of water containated with chloride salts on ...Aninvestigation into the effects of water containated with chloride salts on ...
Aninvestigation into the effects of water containated with chloride salts on ...
 
The effect of groundnut shell ash & glass dust on concrete strength- final.pptx
The effect of groundnut shell ash & glass dust on concrete strength- final.pptxThe effect of groundnut shell ash & glass dust on concrete strength- final.pptx
The effect of groundnut shell ash & glass dust on concrete strength- final.pptx
 
Partial replacement of fine aggregate by M-sand.pptx
Partial replacement of fine aggregate by M-sand.pptxPartial replacement of fine aggregate by M-sand.pptx
Partial replacement of fine aggregate by M-sand.pptx
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #7: Sieve Analysis-2]
 
partial replacement of fine aggregate by glass powder in concrete
partial replacement of fine aggregate by glass powder in concretepartial replacement of fine aggregate by glass powder in concrete
partial replacement of fine aggregate by glass powder in concrete
 
Thesis Presentation on Egg Shell Powder(ESP).pptx
Thesis Presentation on Egg Shell Powder(ESP).pptxThesis Presentation on Egg Shell Powder(ESP).pptx
Thesis Presentation on Egg Shell Powder(ESP).pptx
 
Strength analysis of concrete
Strength analysis of concreteStrength analysis of concrete
Strength analysis of concrete
 
Upgradation Of Coal
Upgradation Of CoalUpgradation Of Coal
Upgradation Of Coal
 
232365141 1-qs-techinical-data
232365141 1-qs-techinical-data232365141 1-qs-techinical-data
232365141 1-qs-techinical-data
 
Asphalt rubber pavement
Asphalt rubber pavementAsphalt rubber pavement
Asphalt rubber pavement
 
IRJET- Geotechnical Investigation of Different Soil Samples using Regression ...
IRJET- Geotechnical Investigation of Different Soil Samples using Regression ...IRJET- Geotechnical Investigation of Different Soil Samples using Regression ...
IRJET- Geotechnical Investigation of Different Soil Samples using Regression ...
 

Recently uploaded

VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
dharasingh5698
 
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Coefficient of Thermal Expansion and their Importance.pptx
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion and their Importance.pptxCoefficient of Thermal Expansion and their Importance.pptx
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion and their Importance.pptx
 
Call Girls Pimpri Chinchwad Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Boo...
Call Girls Pimpri Chinchwad Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Boo...Call Girls Pimpri Chinchwad Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Boo...
Call Girls Pimpri Chinchwad Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Boo...
 
(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7
 
Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - April 2024
Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - April 2024Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - April 2024
Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - April 2024
 
chapter 5.pptx: drainage and irrigation engineering
chapter 5.pptx: drainage and irrigation engineeringchapter 5.pptx: drainage and irrigation engineering
chapter 5.pptx: drainage and irrigation engineering
 
Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01
Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01
Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01
 
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
 
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
 
ONLINE FOOD ORDER SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdf
ONLINE FOOD ORDER SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdfONLINE FOOD ORDER SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdf
ONLINE FOOD ORDER SYSTEM PROJECT REPORT.pdf
 
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPTGenerative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
 
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Pargaon 6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Pargaon  6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Pargaon  6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Pargaon 6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...
 
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park 6297143586 Call Hot Ind...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park  6297143586 Call Hot Ind...Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park  6297143586 Call Hot Ind...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park 6297143586 Call Hot Ind...
 
PVC VS. FIBERGLASS (FRP) GRAVITY SEWER - UNI BELL
PVC VS. FIBERGLASS (FRP) GRAVITY SEWER - UNI BELLPVC VS. FIBERGLASS (FRP) GRAVITY SEWER - UNI BELL
PVC VS. FIBERGLASS (FRP) GRAVITY SEWER - UNI BELL
 
UNIT-III FMM. DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
UNIT-III FMM.        DIMENSIONAL ANALYSISUNIT-III FMM.        DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
UNIT-III FMM. DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
 
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...
 
Roadmap to Membership of RICS - Pathways and Routes
Roadmap to Membership of RICS - Pathways and RoutesRoadmap to Membership of RICS - Pathways and Routes
Roadmap to Membership of RICS - Pathways and Routes
 
Glass Ceramics: Processing and Properties
Glass Ceramics: Processing and PropertiesGlass Ceramics: Processing and Properties
Glass Ceramics: Processing and Properties
 
Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)
Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)
Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)
 
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...
 
Unit 1 - Soil Classification and Compaction.pdf
Unit 1 - Soil Classification and Compaction.pdfUnit 1 - Soil Classification and Compaction.pdf
Unit 1 - Soil Classification and Compaction.pdf
 

Concrete Mix design

  • 1. Department of Civil Engineering Welcome To Our Presentation TOPIC OF OUR PRESENTATION: “Effect of different proportions of Local & Sylhet sand on compressive strength of concrete” 1
  • 2. Presented By: Name ID 01. Kawshik Ahmed 180119021 02. Md. Mahfuz Bin Hamid 160119016 03. Moshiur Rahman 180119042 04. Murari Mohan Biswas 150119002 Supervisor: Md. Menaz Senior Lecturer Dept. of Civil Engineering, EUB 2
  • 3.  Objectives  Material Properties  Methodology  Test Results & Data Analysis  Conclusion Table of Contents: 3
  • 4.  To observe the compressive strength of concrete made of Sylhet Sand.  To observe the compressive strength of concrete made of Local Sand.  To observe the compressive strength of concrete made of different proportions of Local sand & Sylhet sand.  To compare the compressive strength and to determine the economic Local & Sylhet sand ratio which give the best performance. Objectives: 4
  • 5.  CEMENT: In our thesis we used Scan Cement for all casting work. This cement contains clinker, gypsum, fly ash, slag, lime stone and others. Material Properties: Ingredients Percentage of ingredients Clinker 65-79% Slag, Fly Ash, Lime Stone 21-35% Gypsum 0-5% Table: Cement ingredients and their percentage 5
  • 6.  FINE AGGREGATE: In our thesis we used two types of fine aggregate. One is Local Sand and another is Sylhet Sand. Material Properties: 6 Local SandSylhet Sand
  • 7. Material Properties: 7 Sieve Analysis Test of Fine Aggregate
  • 8. 8 Material Properties: Total weight of fine aggregates(Local sand)=1000gm Siev e No. Sieve Size (mm) Weight Retained (gm) % Retained Cumulative % of Retained % Finer FM 4 4.75 0 0 0 100 8 2.36 1 .10 .10 99.90 16 1.18 3 .30 .40 99.60 30 0.6 34 3.4 3.80 96.60 1.90 50 0.3 842 84.20 88.00 12.00 100 0.15 99 9.90 97.90 2.10 pan 21 2.10 100 0 Total 190.20 Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate (Local Sand)
  • 9. Material Properties: 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0.1 1 10 % Finer Sieve Size (mm) Gradation Graph of Fine Aggregate (Local Sand) 9
  • 10. Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate (Sylhet Sand) Material Properties: Total weight of fine aggregates(Sylhet sand)=1000gm Sieve No. Sieve Size (mm) Weight Retained (gm) % Retained Cumulative % of Retained % Finer FM 4 4.75 0 0 0 100 8 2.36 52 5.20 5.20 94.80 16 1.18 253 25.30 30.50 69.50 30 0.6 394 39.40 69.90 30.10 2.90 50 0.3 178 17.80 87.70 12.30 100 0.15 98 9.80 97.50 2.50 pan 25 2.50 100 0 Total 290.80 10
  • 11. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0.1 1 10 % Finer Sieve Size (mm) Gradation Graph of Fine Aggregate (Sylhet Sand) Material Properties: 11
  • 12. 12 Material Properties: Sieve Analysis Test of Coarse Aggregate
  • 13.  COARSE AGGREAGTE: Sieve Analysis of Coarse Aggregate (Brick Chips) Material Properties: Total weight of coarse aggregates(Brick chips)=3000gm Sieve No. Sieve Size (mm) Weight Retained (gm) % Retained (gm) Cumulative % of Retained % Finer FM 2(1/2)” 63 0 0 0 100 1(1/2)” 37.5 0 0 0 100 3/4” 19 1978 65.93 65.93 34.07 3/8” 9.5 979 32.63 98.56 1.44 4 4.75 31 1.03 99.56 0.44 8 2.63 6 0.2 99.79 0.21 7.63 16 1.18 2 0.06 99.85 0.15 30 0.6 0 0 99.85 0.15 50 0.3 0 0 99.85 0.15 100 0.15 0 0 99.85 0.15 pan 4 0.13 99.98 0.02 Total 763.24 13
  • 14. Material Properties: 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0.1 1 10 100 % Finer Sieve Size (mm) Gradation Graph of Coarse Aggregate (Brick Chips) 14
  • 15.  Water Absorption Capacity of Coarse Aggregate: Material Properties: Wet Weight after 24 hours Immersion= 5792 gm Oven Dry Weight after 24 hours = 5214 gm Water Absorption Capacity = [(5792-5214)/5214]X 100 =11.08 % 15
  • 16. Material Properties: Water Absorption Test of Coarse Aggregate 16
  • 17. Concrete Mix Ratio = 1:1.5:3 W/C Ratio= 0.5 Number of Cylinder= 45 (D=4”,H=8”) Mix Design Table  SS 100 = 100% Sylhet Sand & 0% Local Sand.  SS 75 = 75% Sylhet Sand & 25% Local Sand.  SS 50 = 50% Sylhet Sand & 50% Local Sand.  SS 25 = 25% Sylhet Sand & 75% Local Sand.  SS 00 = 0% Sylhet Sand & 100% Local Sand. 17 Methodology: Specimen ID Cement Sand Brick Chips Water Sylhet Local SS 100 6kg 9kg 0kg 18kg 2.7kg SS 75 6kg 6.75kg 2.25kg 18kg 2.7kg SS 50 6kg 4.5kg 4.5kg 18kg 2.7kg SS 25 6kg 2.25kg 6.75kg 18kg 2.7kg SS 0 6kg 0kg 9kg 18kg 2.7kg
  • 18. 18 Fine Aggregate, Coarse Aggregate & Cement Used for Concrete Casting Methodology:
  • 19. 19 Methodology: Concrete Mixing and Cylindrical Specimens Preparation
  • 20. 20 Methodology: Concrete Mixing and Cylindrical Specimens Preparation
  • 21. 21 Methodology: Marking and Demoulding of Specimens & Prepared for Curing
  • 22. 22 Methodology: Compressive Strength Test in Universal Testing Machine (UTM)
  • 23. 23 Test Results & Data Analysis: CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (7 Days) Types of Specimen Sample No. Load (KN) Compressive Strength (Mpa) Average Compressive Strength (Mpa) Average Compressive Strength (Psi) SS 100 1 108 13.3 13.32 1931.42 110 13.58 3 106 13.08 SS 75 1 100 12.34 12.09 1753.052 92 11.35 3 102 12.6 SS 50 1 85 10.49 10.08 1461.62 82 10.12 3 78 9.63 SS 25 1 77 9.5 9.5 1377.52 80 9.88 3 74 9.13 SS 00 1 76 9.38 8.76 1270.22 67 8.27 3 70 8.64
  • 24. 24 Test Results & Data Analysis: Comparison of Compressive Strength (7 Days) 1931.4 1753.05 1461.6 1377.5 1270.2 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SS 100 SS 75 SS 50 SS 25 SS 00 CompressiveStrength(Psi) Sample ID Based on % of Sylhet Sand
  • 25. 25 Test Results & Data Analysis: Types of Specimen Sample No. Load (KN) Compressive Strength (Mpa) Average Compressive Strength (Mpa) Average Compressive Strength (Psi) SS 100 1 163 20.12 20.37 2953.652 170 20.99 3 162 20 SS 75 1 157 19.38 18.89 2739.052 150 18.52 3 152 18.77 SS 50 1 138 17.03 17.25 2501.252 136 16.8 3 140 17.29 SS 25 1 124 15.3 15.43 2237.352 128 15.8 3 123 15.18 SS 00 1 110 13.58 12.92 1873.42 104 12.83 3 100 12.35 CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (14 Days)
  • 26. 26 Test Results & Data Analysis: Comparison of Compressive Strength (14 Days) 2953.65 2739.05 2501.25 2237.35 1873.4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 SS 100 SS 75 SS 50 SS 25 SS 00 CompressiveStrength(Psi) Sample ID Based on % of Sylhet Sand
  • 27. 27 Test Results & Data Analysis: Types of Specimen Sample No. Load (KN) Compressive Strength (Mpa) Average Compressive Strength (Mpa) Average Compressive Strength (Psi) SS 100 1 205 25.31 24.94 3616.32 198 24.44 3 203 25.06 SS 75 1 186 22.84 22.59 3275.552 178 21.97 3 186 22.96 SS 50 1 165 20.74 20.12 2917.42 158 19.5 3 163 20.12 SS 25 1 154 19.01 19.17 2779.652 160 19.75 3 152 18.76 SS 00 1 135 16.66 16.42 2380.92 136 16.8 3 128 15.8 CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (28 Days)
  • 28. 28 Test Results & Data Analysis: Comparison of Compressive Strength (28 Days) 3616.3 3275.55 2917.4 2779.65 2380.9 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 SS 100 SS 75 SS 50 SS 25 SS 00 CompressiveStrength(Psi) Sample ID Based on % of Sylhet Sand
  • 29. 29 Test Results & Data Analysis: Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS100 (7, 14 & 28 Days) 1931.4 2953.65 3616.3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 7 14 28 CompressiveStrength(Psi) Days
  • 30. 30 Test Results & Data Analysis: Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS75 (7, 14 & 28 Days) 1753.05 2739.05 3275.55 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 7 14 28 CompressiveStrength(Psi) Days
  • 31. 31 Test Results & Data Analysis: Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS50 (7, 14 & 28 Days) 1461.6 2501.25 2917.4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 7 14 28 CompressiveStrength(Psi) Days
  • 32. 32 Test Results & Data Analysis: Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS25 (7, 14 & 28 Days) 1377.5 2237.35 2779.65 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 7 14 28 CompressiveStrength(Psi) Days
  • 33. 33 Test Results & Data Analysis: Comparison of Compressive Strength for SS00 (7, 14 & 28 Days) 1270.2 1873.4 2380.9 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 7 14 28 CompressiveStrength(Psi) Days
  • 34. 34 Test Results & Data Analysis: Comparison of Compressive Strength for Different Proportions of Sylhet and Local Sand 1931.4 1753.05 1416.6 1377.5 1270.2 2953.65 2739.05 2501.25 2237.35 1873.4 3616.3 3275.55 2917.4 2779.65 2380.9 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 SS 100 SS 75 SS 50 SS 25 SS 00 CompressiveStrength(Psi) Sample ID Based on % of Sylhet Sand 7 Days 14 Days 28 Days
  • 35. 35 Cost Analysis: Sample Cost Per m3 SS100 435.63tk SS75 423.46tk SS50 411.30tk SS25 399.13tk SS00 386.96tk *Excluding labor & transportation cost
  • 36. 36 Conclusion:  It has been observed that compressive strength of SS100(100% Sylhet Sand) is maximum for 7, 14 and 28 days.  It has been observed that compressive strength of SS00(0% Sylhet Sand) is minimum for 7, 14 and 28 days.  For 28 days, Compressive strength of SS75 is 9.42% less than SS100. Compressive strength of SS50 is 19.33% less than SS100. Compressive strength of SS25 is 23.14% less than SS100. And Compressive strength of SS00 is 34.16% less than SS100.  For 14 days, Compressive strength of SS75 is 7.26% less than SS100. Compressive strength of SS50 is 15.32% less than SS100. Compressive strength of SS25 is 24.25% less than SS100. And Compressive strength of SS00 is 36.57% less than SS100.
  • 37. 37 Conclusion:  For 7 days, Compressive strength of SS75 is 9.23% less than SS100. Compressive strength of SS50 is 26.65% less than SS100. Compressive strength of SS25 is 28.68% less than SS100. And Compressive strength of SS00 is 34.23% less than SS100.  By evaluating and comparing the results, it may be suggested that local sand up to 50% may be used with Sylhet sand for economic purpose.
  • 38. 38