UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE LA SSMA. CONCEPCION




                COMPARATIVE ESSAY
        READING SKILL FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF
           JEREMY HARMER & DOUGLAS BROWN




PARA SER PRESENTADO EN CATEDRA DE DIDACTICA EN INGLES I
                FACULTAD DE EDUCACION
              PEDAGOGIA MEDIA EN INGLES


                         POR
            GABRIEL FERNANDO JARA MUÑOZ




                       DOCENTE
            ROXANA CAROLINA CORREA PEREZ




                        FECHA
                   CONCEPCION, 2012
This comparative essay aims to contrast the two conceptions that the authors Jeremy

Harmer and H. Douglas Brown have about reading skill, in which ideas such as definitions,

reasons, types, processes, skills, principles, techniques and tasks will be presented on this

paper, plus further suggestions that an educator must have in consideration when teaching

reading skill. However, tasks will for little explanation is given in one of them making

comparison harder, besides the content is found before the lesson examples. Comparing

both authors about reading will not only give teachers a very complete vision about

working with texts in classroom and make an effective reading from part of the students,

but also a differentiation between the two vision which allows the reader to make a critical

and constructive view on how to teach a language through reading by taking in

consideration both contributions and how to apply them in real pedagogical practices.



       Reading, as Brown (1994) mentions, is a skill that has to be developed within the

interrelationship of all the abilities (listening, reading, writing and speaking) for the reason

that when educators aims to work in a skill, in this case reading, there is an inevitable

integration of all of them, meaning that if students work with a text, in order to read it

comprehensively they have to work with tasks that will require different skills to interact

with the content and make the text come to live. Harmer (1998) also points out some

activities that indirectly integrates different skills such as discussions or imaginative

responses (write or say an opinion and listen to a classmate), in addition of all the other

parallel benefits such as vocabulary knowledge, spelling and writing improvement.

Therefore both authors give great importance to the development of this skill as a extremely

helpful tool to acquire a language (Harmer, 1998).
Nevertheless, Brown (1994) makes a deeper analysis of this skill by mentioning the

context in which second language reading pedagogy was developed and the processes that

were studied as a way of approaching the reading, taking for instance bottom-up and top-

down processing, but interestingly enough according to the studies made in the area of

teaching methodology, the use of both process of reading can lead to what is called

interactive reading, in which educators might use both processes by switching between

them according to the task they are working on with the students. Now, Harmer (1998)

explains two different terms that in a way can be related to the bottom-up and top-down

processes, extensive reading (also mentioned by Brown, pg. 301) and intensive reading

(even though these concepts were mentioned in the context of types of reading). Bottom-up

is focused on the smallest features of the text such as words being also the case of intensive

reading wherein the attention lies in the construction of reading texts or particular uses of

grammar and vocabulary, which could also be related to the formal schemata in which

attention is paid to the discourse structure (Brown, 1994 pg. 300). On the other hand

extensive reading attempts to give to students long texts (it could appeal to students’

personal likes) in which similarities can be found in top-down process since tries to

approach to the reading text through students’ personal knowledge or experience, also

presented as the schemata theory (Brown, 1994). However, the relationship among these

concepts might not be equal since two of them are processes and the last two are types of

reading, therefore it would be more accurate to state that the processes (bottom-up and top-

down) can be used according to the types of texts that Harmer (1998) has given, whether

the process respond to the types of text purpose.
Both authors present skills that reading activities should improve or develop,

nonetheless the numbers of skills presented by the authors differ in number. Harmer (1998)

presents in a very general view three main reading skills such as scan, skim and reading

for detailed comprehension, whereas Brown (1994) presents a list of “microskills for

reading comprehension” within the context of reading strategies which is more extended

and goes from the distinction of different words in the reading to the recognition of them

plus the development of strategies in which scanning and skimming are presented. Brown

gives a more detailed list of strategies in which adds plenty of them such as silent reading,

semantic maps, guessing etc.



       Principles for a better reading are given by the authors, so in order to make it easier

to appreciate both contributions similar principles will be presented first and different

principles (not necessarily opposing principles) will be presented in second place. Firstly

both authors give a lot of importance to the engagement or motivation of the reading text,

Harmer (1998) emphasizes the concept of joyful reading in which many elements have to

be integrated to this principle such as developing the reading for pleasure, make the reading

meaningful, appeal to students’ interests and make a sequence of lessons related to a topic

so students do not feel lost about reading a topic and then moving on something else.

Brown (1994) also appeal to students interests and also explains that reading should follow

the goal of developing this skills which to read events of real life so students can use it in

their everyday life. In a similar way what Harmer (1998) expresses in its third principle

about encouraging students to respond to a content of a text is partially related to Brown’s

motivation principle, because it encourages students to respond to the message of the text,

the content with their personal point of view, which can clearly help to create a meaningful
reading and an effective comprehension of the text, beside of all the grammatical aspects

that they can improve through reading. Secondly, Brown (1994) describes that educators

should balance the authenticity and readability of texts, meaning that texts should be chosen

regarding their authenticity (topic located in the real world) and readability (adapting them

according the text to their level without missing the main features of the text but keeping a

little bit of challenge among the vocabulary, expressions etc). This has been pointed out by

Harmer (1998) but in a different organization contextualized in the reading levels, wherein

the possibility of simplifying text could happen depending on the level of students and that

texts should be authentic (texts intended for any competent user of the language).



       Finally, among other aspects that both Brown and Harmer have pointed out in their

principles we can find; in first place predictions, matching the task with the topic

(Harmer, 1998) and the use of reading strategies (presented by both authors), include

bottom-up and top-down techniques, subdivide techniques into before, while and after

reading (Brown, 1994). Obviously both authors give an important contribution with their

principles, however Brown makes a very much deeper and extensive review of the factors

that teachers might need when preparing and doing a reading activity.



       As it was mentioned before reading is a very important skill that students need to

develop, plenty of information has been presented from part of Jeremy Harmer and H.

Douglas Brown. Among the main ideas it can be said that reading or any skill need from

the other skills for it is impossible to insolate them, there are many techniques or strategies

that educators can use to make reading texts more interesting, real, meaningful. Reading

texts can be simplified for students according to their level, however both authors advise to
be careful not to lose the meaning of the text and also to keep in mind to preserve some

structure in order to give to students challenging texts. Learning how to teach English

through reading is a useful tool that must be put in practice always, for it can enhance

students’ vocabulary, grammar and even culture.
Bibliography



   •   Brown, H (1994) Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach to Language

       Pedagogy, Longman, pg. 298-333.

   •   Harmer, J (1998) How to Teach English An introduction to practice of English

       language teaching, Longman, pg. 68-78

Comparative essay gabriel jara

  • 1.
    UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DELA SSMA. CONCEPCION COMPARATIVE ESSAY READING SKILL FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF JEREMY HARMER & DOUGLAS BROWN PARA SER PRESENTADO EN CATEDRA DE DIDACTICA EN INGLES I FACULTAD DE EDUCACION PEDAGOGIA MEDIA EN INGLES POR GABRIEL FERNANDO JARA MUÑOZ DOCENTE ROXANA CAROLINA CORREA PEREZ FECHA CONCEPCION, 2012
  • 2.
    This comparative essayaims to contrast the two conceptions that the authors Jeremy Harmer and H. Douglas Brown have about reading skill, in which ideas such as definitions, reasons, types, processes, skills, principles, techniques and tasks will be presented on this paper, plus further suggestions that an educator must have in consideration when teaching reading skill. However, tasks will for little explanation is given in one of them making comparison harder, besides the content is found before the lesson examples. Comparing both authors about reading will not only give teachers a very complete vision about working with texts in classroom and make an effective reading from part of the students, but also a differentiation between the two vision which allows the reader to make a critical and constructive view on how to teach a language through reading by taking in consideration both contributions and how to apply them in real pedagogical practices. Reading, as Brown (1994) mentions, is a skill that has to be developed within the interrelationship of all the abilities (listening, reading, writing and speaking) for the reason that when educators aims to work in a skill, in this case reading, there is an inevitable integration of all of them, meaning that if students work with a text, in order to read it comprehensively they have to work with tasks that will require different skills to interact with the content and make the text come to live. Harmer (1998) also points out some activities that indirectly integrates different skills such as discussions or imaginative responses (write or say an opinion and listen to a classmate), in addition of all the other parallel benefits such as vocabulary knowledge, spelling and writing improvement. Therefore both authors give great importance to the development of this skill as a extremely helpful tool to acquire a language (Harmer, 1998).
  • 3.
    Nevertheless, Brown (1994)makes a deeper analysis of this skill by mentioning the context in which second language reading pedagogy was developed and the processes that were studied as a way of approaching the reading, taking for instance bottom-up and top- down processing, but interestingly enough according to the studies made in the area of teaching methodology, the use of both process of reading can lead to what is called interactive reading, in which educators might use both processes by switching between them according to the task they are working on with the students. Now, Harmer (1998) explains two different terms that in a way can be related to the bottom-up and top-down processes, extensive reading (also mentioned by Brown, pg. 301) and intensive reading (even though these concepts were mentioned in the context of types of reading). Bottom-up is focused on the smallest features of the text such as words being also the case of intensive reading wherein the attention lies in the construction of reading texts or particular uses of grammar and vocabulary, which could also be related to the formal schemata in which attention is paid to the discourse structure (Brown, 1994 pg. 300). On the other hand extensive reading attempts to give to students long texts (it could appeal to students’ personal likes) in which similarities can be found in top-down process since tries to approach to the reading text through students’ personal knowledge or experience, also presented as the schemata theory (Brown, 1994). However, the relationship among these concepts might not be equal since two of them are processes and the last two are types of reading, therefore it would be more accurate to state that the processes (bottom-up and top- down) can be used according to the types of texts that Harmer (1998) has given, whether the process respond to the types of text purpose.
  • 4.
    Both authors presentskills that reading activities should improve or develop, nonetheless the numbers of skills presented by the authors differ in number. Harmer (1998) presents in a very general view three main reading skills such as scan, skim and reading for detailed comprehension, whereas Brown (1994) presents a list of “microskills for reading comprehension” within the context of reading strategies which is more extended and goes from the distinction of different words in the reading to the recognition of them plus the development of strategies in which scanning and skimming are presented. Brown gives a more detailed list of strategies in which adds plenty of them such as silent reading, semantic maps, guessing etc. Principles for a better reading are given by the authors, so in order to make it easier to appreciate both contributions similar principles will be presented first and different principles (not necessarily opposing principles) will be presented in second place. Firstly both authors give a lot of importance to the engagement or motivation of the reading text, Harmer (1998) emphasizes the concept of joyful reading in which many elements have to be integrated to this principle such as developing the reading for pleasure, make the reading meaningful, appeal to students’ interests and make a sequence of lessons related to a topic so students do not feel lost about reading a topic and then moving on something else. Brown (1994) also appeal to students interests and also explains that reading should follow the goal of developing this skills which to read events of real life so students can use it in their everyday life. In a similar way what Harmer (1998) expresses in its third principle about encouraging students to respond to a content of a text is partially related to Brown’s motivation principle, because it encourages students to respond to the message of the text, the content with their personal point of view, which can clearly help to create a meaningful
  • 5.
    reading and aneffective comprehension of the text, beside of all the grammatical aspects that they can improve through reading. Secondly, Brown (1994) describes that educators should balance the authenticity and readability of texts, meaning that texts should be chosen regarding their authenticity (topic located in the real world) and readability (adapting them according the text to their level without missing the main features of the text but keeping a little bit of challenge among the vocabulary, expressions etc). This has been pointed out by Harmer (1998) but in a different organization contextualized in the reading levels, wherein the possibility of simplifying text could happen depending on the level of students and that texts should be authentic (texts intended for any competent user of the language). Finally, among other aspects that both Brown and Harmer have pointed out in their principles we can find; in first place predictions, matching the task with the topic (Harmer, 1998) and the use of reading strategies (presented by both authors), include bottom-up and top-down techniques, subdivide techniques into before, while and after reading (Brown, 1994). Obviously both authors give an important contribution with their principles, however Brown makes a very much deeper and extensive review of the factors that teachers might need when preparing and doing a reading activity. As it was mentioned before reading is a very important skill that students need to develop, plenty of information has been presented from part of Jeremy Harmer and H. Douglas Brown. Among the main ideas it can be said that reading or any skill need from the other skills for it is impossible to insolate them, there are many techniques or strategies that educators can use to make reading texts more interesting, real, meaningful. Reading texts can be simplified for students according to their level, however both authors advise to
  • 6.
    be careful notto lose the meaning of the text and also to keep in mind to preserve some structure in order to give to students challenging texts. Learning how to teach English through reading is a useful tool that must be put in practice always, for it can enhance students’ vocabulary, grammar and even culture.
  • 7.
    Bibliography • Brown, H (1994) Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Longman, pg. 298-333. • Harmer, J (1998) How to Teach English An introduction to practice of English language teaching, Longman, pg. 68-78