This essay compares the theories of second language reading comprehension presented by Brown (2000) and Harmer (2001). Both authors divide reading into two categories: Brown uses bottom-up and top-down processing, while Harmer distinguishes between intensive and extensive reading. The authors agree that a combination of both top-down and bottom-up approaches is most effective. However, they differ in that Brown emphasizes connecting reading to other skills like writing, while Harmer argues intensive and extensive reading should be used together. Overall the essay examines the similarities and differences in how these contemporary authors approach the topic of second language reading.