Communicating in NetworksBrendan Sullivan
IntroductionShift from face-to-face to virtual networksEmergent, informal, and interdependentNetworks are crucial for communication
Small-Group Communication NetworksGroups of five peopleFour types of small-group communication:CircleWheelChainAll-Channel
Small Group Communication NetworksBBCAACWheelCircleDEDEBChainACABCDEAll-ChannelED
Emergent Communication NetworksGrow from formal/informal communicationEmphasis on connections between peopleSo-called organizational “grapevine”Referred to as the “rumor mill”
Analyzing Communication NetworksInformal communication is fluidFormal communication is infrequentEmergent communication concernsOverall patterns of interactionCommunication network rolesContent of communication networks
Analyzing Communication NetworksPatterns of InteractionCliques emerge as a result of communicationCommunication networks vary widely in densityDensity influences employeesExtraorganizational networksContacts from the industry or community
Analyzing Communication NetworksCommunication Network RolesAffects one’s experience of workThe more connected, the more secureFour types of communication roles in networks:The isolateGroup memberBridgeLiaison
Analyzing Communication NetworksContent of Communication NetworksDevelop around specific topics of communicationImportant in terms of sense-making processGroup members are in the mainstreamThe isolates hold radically different interpretations
Interorganizational Communication NetworksEnduring transactions, flows, and linkagesVary in openness, density, interdependenceSensitive to environmental joltsAffecting the entire companyOne company provides serviceThe other provides delivery of a productCommunication can occur through inter-company hiring
Interorganizational Communication NetworksOrganizations are likely to turn to alliancesMergersAcquisitionsJoint venturesInterorganizational groups are great for dialogue
The Networked SocietyDefinition of “network” is always changingGlobal communication is now onlineInformation seekingRelational developmentThousands of virtual gathering placesMySpace, Facebook, Twitter
The Networked SocietyThe bad side…Critics mourn the demise of local communitiesPotentially disastrous consequencesOnline terrorismRecruitingStaying connected with new members
Networks and the NWSFThe NWSF needed network communicationFacebook/TwitterAllows reach to a larger audienceGloballyDemographically

Communicating in Networks

Editor's Notes

  • #3 -Contemporary organizational communication has shifted rapidly from a singular emphasis on face-to-face teams to virtual networks of people across multiple locales organized for a common purpose.-Networks are emergent, informal, and somewhat less interdependent than teams.-Networks matter because regular contact between identifiable groups of people can play an important role in establishing access to information and in the quality and direction of decision making.
  • #4 -Early research on communication structure focused on examining small-group communication style networks (groups of five people).-Four groups of small-communication networks were typically studied: Circle, wheel, chain, and all-channel
  • #6 -The most powerful group within organizations are those that emerge from formal and informal communication among people who work together.-The current focus on communication networks in organizations stems from a general acceptance of systems theories, which emphasize the connections between people and the relationships that constitute an organization.-Early research on emergent communication networks investigated the so-called organizational “grapevine.”-This term has since come to mean the persistent informal network within an organization, sometimes referred to disparagingly by management as the “rumor mill.”
  • #7 -Informal communication in organizations is fluid and in a constant state of change.-Whereas formal reorganizations may occur only infrequently, informal reorganizations occur continuously.-In studying emergent communication networks, we are concerned mainly with overall patterns of interaction, communication network roles, and the content of communication networks.
  • #8 -A number of informal groups or cliques emerge as a result of communication among people in organizations.-Communication networks vary widely in density, which is determined by dividing the number of communication links (reported communication contacts) that exist among organizational members by the number of possible links if everyone knew everyone else.-Research suggests that the density of organizational networks has considerable influence over whether other employees adopt a new idea or technology.-Extraorganizational networks may be particularly important resources for employees in historically marginalized groups who have difficulty finding mentors and other supports in positions of power within the organizations.
  • #9 -Communication network roles affect one’s experience of work and one’s degree of influence on others.-Well-connected individuals in an organization tend to be the most influential and the least likely to leave.-Four types of communication roles occur in networks: the isolate, group member, bridge, liaison.
  • #10 -Emergent communication networks develop around specific topics, or content areas, or communication.-The content of communication networks takes on added significance when we consider it in terms of the sense-making process.-Individuals who are in the mainstream with regard to employee values and beliefs would be group members; those holding radically different interpretations would be isolates.
  • #11 -Interorganizational communication networks are the enduring transactions, flows and linkages that occur among or between organizations.-Such networks vary in terms of their openness, density, and interdependence.-Two organizations are said to be vertically integrated when one builds parts or provides services that the other needs for its delivery of a product or service.-Interestingly, one efficient way of sharing information across organizational lines is not through overt communication but by hiring employees from other companies.
  • #12 -In the contemporary economic environment, organizations are most likely to turn to strategic alliances—such as mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures—to enhance their financial status and political power.-Like multidisciplinary groups, interorganizational communication networks are potential sites of dialogue.
  • #13 -Within only a few years, our understanding of what constitutes a network has changed considerably, from the connections among people within a single organization to the connections among people in a global society.-Global communication networks have been transformed by online communication. Significant changes in communication behaviors have been noted, especially in information seeking and relational development.-Thousands of virtual gathering places provide continuous updates on activities, as well as the ability to stay in regular touch with a vastly expanded collection of contacts who may or may not be properly classified as “friends.”
  • #14 -Some critics mourn the demise of local communities, whereas others envision an electronic global village that provides people with instantaneous access to information and other people worldwide.-With potentially disastrous consequences, terrorist organizations have turned to online communication as a means of recruiting and staying connected with new members.