Presented at the 2015 Charleston Conference by Judith M. Nixon, Education Librarian, Purdue University, and Suzanne Ward, Collection Strategist, Purdue University.
The document provides tips for writing a dissertation, including choosing an appropriate topic that interests the writer, composing a strong thesis statement, conducting thorough research, properly structuring the dissertation with sections like introduction, discussion, and conclusion, and revising the work to correct errors. Follow these tips to write an effective dissertation that analyzes the research topic critically and supports the thesis statement with solid arguments.
This document provides guidance on writing for publication. It discusses planning research from the start by considering the hypothesis, design, methodology and more. Key sections of a research article are introduced, including the introduction, methods, results, discussion and more. Tips are provided for writing an effective title and abstract to grab readers' attention. Reporting standards and how to choose an appropriate journal are also covered. The document concludes with suggestions for getting the editors' and reviewers' attention such as writing a thoughtful cover letter and abstract that highlights the significance and novelty of the findings.
Paths toward Publication for Musicologists, Texas Tech 2010Christopher Smith
Presentation by TTU Musicology Chair Dr Christopher J Smith on publishing for musicologists. Includes strategies for generating topics, organizing research, identifying targets, networking, and more; also a "mind-map" depicting interlocking publication strategies.
The document outlines the step-by-step process for writing a review paper, including viewing, internalization, and extraction stages. In the viewing stage, the researcher skims sources to identify relevance. Internalization involves deep reading and noting key details about the source. Extraction uses the notes to form an outline for the review paper by identifying questions to answer about trends, methods, authors, findings, and comparisons within the field. Developing an outline from extracted notes is an important part of the review paper process.
This document provides guidance on writing and publishing a research paper. It discusses organizing data and identifying the main findings to focus the paper. The introduction should provide background and context while the experimental section explains methods. Results and discussion should present findings and compare to prior work. The conclusion should summarize key results and future directions. Structure, language, style, selecting journals, submission process, and responding to reviews are also covered to help communicate ideas effectively through scholarly publication.
How To Write Your Research DissertationChris Jobling
This presentation describes the standard structure of your research dissertation and suggests a methodology for its successful production using modern word processing tools.
This document outlines a lesson on analyzing magazine contents pages. It discusses conventions like using a consistent color scheme, listing the contents in columns, including the main image and logo from the front cover, and ordering items from most to least important. Students are then tasked with choosing 4 magazine covers and analyzing the contents pages for each magazine based on these conventions.
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application by Catherine Sarkisian,...UCLA CTSI
Catherinse Sarkisian speaks on the topic of A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application at the R Award Workshop on November 09, 2017 at UCLA.
The document provides tips for writing a dissertation, including choosing an appropriate topic that interests the writer, composing a strong thesis statement, conducting thorough research, properly structuring the dissertation with sections like introduction, discussion, and conclusion, and revising the work to correct errors. Follow these tips to write an effective dissertation that analyzes the research topic critically and supports the thesis statement with solid arguments.
This document provides guidance on writing for publication. It discusses planning research from the start by considering the hypothesis, design, methodology and more. Key sections of a research article are introduced, including the introduction, methods, results, discussion and more. Tips are provided for writing an effective title and abstract to grab readers' attention. Reporting standards and how to choose an appropriate journal are also covered. The document concludes with suggestions for getting the editors' and reviewers' attention such as writing a thoughtful cover letter and abstract that highlights the significance and novelty of the findings.
Paths toward Publication for Musicologists, Texas Tech 2010Christopher Smith
Presentation by TTU Musicology Chair Dr Christopher J Smith on publishing for musicologists. Includes strategies for generating topics, organizing research, identifying targets, networking, and more; also a "mind-map" depicting interlocking publication strategies.
The document outlines the step-by-step process for writing a review paper, including viewing, internalization, and extraction stages. In the viewing stage, the researcher skims sources to identify relevance. Internalization involves deep reading and noting key details about the source. Extraction uses the notes to form an outline for the review paper by identifying questions to answer about trends, methods, authors, findings, and comparisons within the field. Developing an outline from extracted notes is an important part of the review paper process.
This document provides guidance on writing and publishing a research paper. It discusses organizing data and identifying the main findings to focus the paper. The introduction should provide background and context while the experimental section explains methods. Results and discussion should present findings and compare to prior work. The conclusion should summarize key results and future directions. Structure, language, style, selecting journals, submission process, and responding to reviews are also covered to help communicate ideas effectively through scholarly publication.
How To Write Your Research DissertationChris Jobling
This presentation describes the standard structure of your research dissertation and suggests a methodology for its successful production using modern word processing tools.
This document outlines a lesson on analyzing magazine contents pages. It discusses conventions like using a consistent color scheme, listing the contents in columns, including the main image and logo from the front cover, and ordering items from most to least important. Students are then tasked with choosing 4 magazine covers and analyzing the contents pages for each magazine based on these conventions.
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application by Catherine Sarkisian,...UCLA CTSI
Catherinse Sarkisian speaks on the topic of A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application at the R Award Workshop on November 09, 2017 at UCLA.
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Conference by Athena Hoeppner, Electronic Resources Librarian, University of Central Florida; Roën Janyk, Web Services Librarian, Okanagan College; and Oliver Pesch, Chief Product Strategist, EBSCO Information Services. http://sched.co/4Bpv
Building Capacity in Your Library for Research Data Management Support (Or Wh...Charleston Conference
This document summarizes the North Carolina State University Libraries' experience offering a research data management plan (DMP) review service. It discusses models of research data management support, including providing a DMP guide and tool, workshops, and consultations. The library received positive feedback from researchers who used the DMP review service. The document also covers lessons learned about the research process, opportunities for librarian learning, campus partnerships, and next steps for developing research data management support at NCSU and nationally.
From Collection Development to Content Development: Organization and Staffing...Charleston Conference
The document discusses changes to the organization and staffing of content development at the University of Kansas Libraries in response to strategic initiatives at KU. Specifically:
- The libraries moved from a subject bibliographer model to content development specialists to be more flexible and responsive to changing research needs. However, some areas still require deep subject expertise.
- Common responsibilities for content development specialists include monitoring collections, making acquisition decisions, maintaining awareness of research and curricula, and providing instruction and consultation.
- An environmental scan was conducted to understand changing research habits and informational needs in order to shift the focus from collections to users and content.
- Areas like world history, visual arts, English literature, and performing arts
Peeling Back the Discovery Layer: Web-Scale Searching, User Expectations, and...Charleston Conference
1) The document discusses usage statistics and known issues with the OneSearch discovery platform across several CUNY colleges with varying enrollments.
2) It notes how students typically conduct searches on OneSearch using natural language and simple keywords without Boolean operators or limiting facets. They expect results even for misspelled terms.
3) Challenges include authentication issues, inconsistent display of consortial materials, relevance of results, and students relying too heavily on default rankings without evaluating sources critically. Opportunities include streamlining the user experience and instruction.
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Library Conference by Ibironke Lawal, Science & Engineering Collections Librarian at Virginia Commonwealth University.
Librarians at the University of Kansas Libraries were surveyed about their preferences for accessing collections through various discovery tools like Primo, Google Scholar, and subject databases. While Primo showed improvements, librarians still found subject databases provided the best results and were confused about what materials Primo searches. Duplicated results and relevancy ranking were identified as areas needing further improvement in Primo. Education efforts are needed to help librarians better understand Primo as it continues to develop.
This document discusses a literature review on user satisfaction with academic ebook collections. It summarizes findings from 99 articles that directly addressed satisfaction. Key themes included variations in how satisfaction was defined and measured, comparisons of ebooks to print books, and the impact of ebook formats, platforms and accessibility features on user experience. Next steps proposed continuing the conversation with practitioners, replicating user experience studies with clearer definitions, and observing actual user behaviors. The overall goal is to enhance user experience and accessibility of ebook collections.
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Conference by Christina Geuther, Electronic Resources Librarian, Kansas State University, and Mira Greene, Head, Content Development & Acquisitions, Kansas State University.
This document summarizes an evaluation of ReadCube as an alternative to interlibrary loans for providing access to journal articles. It finds that ReadCube was used nearly 7 times as much as interlibrary loans to access Nature journal articles, but that ReadCube costs were only 1.7 times higher than interlibrary loan copyright fees. Most users downloaded 5 or fewer articles. While users appreciated the access, some had issues with printing restrictions. The evaluation concluded that at current usage and cost levels, ReadCube provides a financially sustainable and acceptable alternative to interlibrary loans.
Interrogating Demand: Pathways Toward Purchase in Patron-Influenced eBook ModelsCharleston Conference
This document summarizes different patron-influenced eBook models used at University of California campuses, including demand-driven acquisition (DDA) and evidence-based selection. It provides data on the number of print book duplicates purchased with circulation records, as well as eBooks purchased by publication year. Usage statistics are presented on the number of eBook purchases and short-term loans (STL), along with the top subject areas and publishers. The document concludes by discussing the potential for obtaining post-purchase usage data.
What’s My Motivation, Darling? Inspiring Researchers to Build and Measure the...Charleston Conference
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Conference by David Somer, Product Director • Co-Founder, Kudos; Graham Stone
Information Resources Manager, University of Huddersfield, UK; and Sara Rouhi, Product Sales Manager, The Americas, Altmetric.
Longitudinal Journal Usage Analysis and the Development of Institutional Spec...Charleston Conference
This document summarizes a longitudinal analysis of journal usage at a university over three years (2012-2014). Key findings include: (1) Approximately 20-25% of available journals accounted for nearly all usage, conforming to Pareto's Law. (2) Nearly 6,000 journal titles saw some usage in all three years. (3) Over 3,300 titles were used in 2013-2014, and hundreds were used across other two-year periods. Core journal lists were proposed based on consistently high-usage titles within subjects.
Print & E-Books Use in Tandem – Dialogue on the Implications for Library Coll...Charleston Conference
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Conference by Rebecca Seger, Senior Director, Institutional Sales, Oxford University Press, and Luke Swindler, Collections Management Officer, Univeristy of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
The writing process consists of three stages: pre-writing, writing, and post-writing. The writing stage involves drafting the document by putting ideas into sentences and paragraphs. When drafting, writers should include a thesis statement, topic sentences for each paragraph, sufficient support for ideas, coherence between sentences and paragraphs, and unity with the overall thesis. The post-writing stage includes responding to feedback, revising for content and structure, editing for grammar and mechanics, proofreading for errors, and finalizing the document for publication or distribution.
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Conference by Athena Hoeppner, Electronic Resources Librarian, University of Central Florida; Roën Janyk, Web Services Librarian, Okanagan College; and Oliver Pesch, Chief Product Strategist, EBSCO Information Services. http://sched.co/4Bpv
Building Capacity in Your Library for Research Data Management Support (Or Wh...Charleston Conference
This document summarizes the North Carolina State University Libraries' experience offering a research data management plan (DMP) review service. It discusses models of research data management support, including providing a DMP guide and tool, workshops, and consultations. The library received positive feedback from researchers who used the DMP review service. The document also covers lessons learned about the research process, opportunities for librarian learning, campus partnerships, and next steps for developing research data management support at NCSU and nationally.
From Collection Development to Content Development: Organization and Staffing...Charleston Conference
The document discusses changes to the organization and staffing of content development at the University of Kansas Libraries in response to strategic initiatives at KU. Specifically:
- The libraries moved from a subject bibliographer model to content development specialists to be more flexible and responsive to changing research needs. However, some areas still require deep subject expertise.
- Common responsibilities for content development specialists include monitoring collections, making acquisition decisions, maintaining awareness of research and curricula, and providing instruction and consultation.
- An environmental scan was conducted to understand changing research habits and informational needs in order to shift the focus from collections to users and content.
- Areas like world history, visual arts, English literature, and performing arts
Peeling Back the Discovery Layer: Web-Scale Searching, User Expectations, and...Charleston Conference
1) The document discusses usage statistics and known issues with the OneSearch discovery platform across several CUNY colleges with varying enrollments.
2) It notes how students typically conduct searches on OneSearch using natural language and simple keywords without Boolean operators or limiting facets. They expect results even for misspelled terms.
3) Challenges include authentication issues, inconsistent display of consortial materials, relevance of results, and students relying too heavily on default rankings without evaluating sources critically. Opportunities include streamlining the user experience and instruction.
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Library Conference by Ibironke Lawal, Science & Engineering Collections Librarian at Virginia Commonwealth University.
Librarians at the University of Kansas Libraries were surveyed about their preferences for accessing collections through various discovery tools like Primo, Google Scholar, and subject databases. While Primo showed improvements, librarians still found subject databases provided the best results and were confused about what materials Primo searches. Duplicated results and relevancy ranking were identified as areas needing further improvement in Primo. Education efforts are needed to help librarians better understand Primo as it continues to develop.
This document discusses a literature review on user satisfaction with academic ebook collections. It summarizes findings from 99 articles that directly addressed satisfaction. Key themes included variations in how satisfaction was defined and measured, comparisons of ebooks to print books, and the impact of ebook formats, platforms and accessibility features on user experience. Next steps proposed continuing the conversation with practitioners, replicating user experience studies with clearer definitions, and observing actual user behaviors. The overall goal is to enhance user experience and accessibility of ebook collections.
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Conference by Christina Geuther, Electronic Resources Librarian, Kansas State University, and Mira Greene, Head, Content Development & Acquisitions, Kansas State University.
This document summarizes an evaluation of ReadCube as an alternative to interlibrary loans for providing access to journal articles. It finds that ReadCube was used nearly 7 times as much as interlibrary loans to access Nature journal articles, but that ReadCube costs were only 1.7 times higher than interlibrary loan copyright fees. Most users downloaded 5 or fewer articles. While users appreciated the access, some had issues with printing restrictions. The evaluation concluded that at current usage and cost levels, ReadCube provides a financially sustainable and acceptable alternative to interlibrary loans.
Interrogating Demand: Pathways Toward Purchase in Patron-Influenced eBook ModelsCharleston Conference
This document summarizes different patron-influenced eBook models used at University of California campuses, including demand-driven acquisition (DDA) and evidence-based selection. It provides data on the number of print book duplicates purchased with circulation records, as well as eBooks purchased by publication year. Usage statistics are presented on the number of eBook purchases and short-term loans (STL), along with the top subject areas and publishers. The document concludes by discussing the potential for obtaining post-purchase usage data.
What’s My Motivation, Darling? Inspiring Researchers to Build and Measure the...Charleston Conference
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Conference by David Somer, Product Director • Co-Founder, Kudos; Graham Stone
Information Resources Manager, University of Huddersfield, UK; and Sara Rouhi, Product Sales Manager, The Americas, Altmetric.
Longitudinal Journal Usage Analysis and the Development of Institutional Spec...Charleston Conference
This document summarizes a longitudinal analysis of journal usage at a university over three years (2012-2014). Key findings include: (1) Approximately 20-25% of available journals accounted for nearly all usage, conforming to Pareto's Law. (2) Nearly 6,000 journal titles saw some usage in all three years. (3) Over 3,300 titles were used in 2013-2014, and hundreds were used across other two-year periods. Core journal lists were proposed based on consistently high-usage titles within subjects.
Print & E-Books Use in Tandem – Dialogue on the Implications for Library Coll...Charleston Conference
Presented at the 2015 Charleston Conference by Rebecca Seger, Senior Director, Institutional Sales, Oxford University Press, and Luke Swindler, Collections Management Officer, Univeristy of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
The writing process consists of three stages: pre-writing, writing, and post-writing. The writing stage involves drafting the document by putting ideas into sentences and paragraphs. When drafting, writers should include a thesis statement, topic sentences for each paragraph, sufficient support for ideas, coherence between sentences and paragraphs, and unity with the overall thesis. The post-writing stage includes responding to feedback, revising for content and structure, editing for grammar and mechanics, proofreading for errors, and finalizing the document for publication or distribution.
Togar M. Simatupang gave a presentation on conducting research and getting work published. He discussed the process of developing research ideas, choosing appropriate research methods, structuring manuscripts, and navigating the publication process. He emphasized that publishing papers regularly is important for academic careers. The presentation outlined key steps like selecting target journals, responding to peer reviews, and improving manuscripts based on feedback in order to get work published.
Presentation emerald linking research to the benefit of the communityraboudi amina
This document provides guidance on preparing manuscripts for international journals. It discusses key aspects such as choosing the right journal, following the journal's author guidelines, and structuring the manuscript properly. The ideal manuscript length is 25-30 pages and should follow a standard structure of title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions sections. It is important to choose the correct journal type and scope that matches your research, and only submit your manuscript to one journal. The document offers tips for writing clearly and concisely while emphasizing the main points of your research for reviewers.
linking research to the benefit of the communityraboudi amina
This document provides guidance on preparing manuscripts for international journals. It discusses key aspects such as choosing the right journal, following the journal's author guidelines, and structuring the manuscript properly. The ideal manuscript length is 25-30 pages and should follow a standard structure of title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions sections. It is important to choose the correct journal type for the manuscript and to only submit to one journal. The role of editors, publishers and peer reviewers in the publication process is also outlined. Overall, the document provides practical tips for writing clear and well-organized manuscripts that will appeal to journal editors.
This document provides guidelines for writing a technical paper, including identifying the audience, organizing the paper, drafting and revising the text, preparing figures and tables, conducting research, and getting feedback. The key steps are to identify the audience and their interests, decide if the topic is worth writing about through literature research, organize the paper into standard sections like introduction, background, methods, results, and conclusions, write a first draft and revise it multiple times, and get peer reviews to improve the paper. Research should be conducted through relevant databases and libraries to include related work in the background section.
The document discusses the writing process and provides guidance on its key steps:
1) Prewriting techniques like brainstorming, outlining, and idea mapping help choose a topic and narrow its focus.
2) Drafting creates a complete first version through techniques like starting in a comfortable area and taking breaks.
3) Revising examines ideas for clarity and expression for a second look.
4) Editing further refines mechanics, readability, and style.
Literature gap identification gvk sharma-1Pooja Tripathi
This document outlines the process of identifying research gaps through literature review. It discusses the characteristics of an effective researcher and provides a 4-stage approach to reading research papers to understand the key details and evaluate claims. The sources of research gaps are described, such as future work sections, systematic reviews, and trend papers. Methods to identify gaps include comparing approaches, identifying simplifications, and presenting seminars. Practical aids that help identify gaps include note-taking, writing survey papers, and getting feedback from others.
Research problem, indexing, scopus, web and publication strategiesDr Kirpa Ram Jangra
The document provides information on how to publish research papers, including choosing journals, submitting papers, responding to reviews, and publishing. It discusses selecting suitable journals based on subject match, readership, impact, and policies. It also describes best practices for submitting papers, understanding review decisions, revising papers, and answering editor queries. Finally, it touches on publishing research, predatory journals, abstracting and indexing services, and tactics for journal selection.
Writing for Careers: The Publishing IndustryHannahOnder
The document discusses careers in the publishing industry, focusing on editors. It outlines the various roles editors can have, from entry-level positions like editorial assistants to senior roles like executive editors. Editors' duties involve working with authors, editing manuscripts, managing projects, and communicating between departments. The document also discusses requirements like a college degree and strong writing skills, benefits like insurance and discounts, and desirable qualities like a love of books and good communication skills. Editors can find work at major publishing houses.
This document provides strategies for assigning composition in writing courses. It discusses low-stakes writing assignments to help students develop critical thinking through exploring ideas without right answers. It also discusses providing revision-oriented feedback that focuses on higher-order concerns before lower-order ones. Additionally, it recommends giving clear handouts that explain assignment tasks and criteria. Scaffolding assignments by having students submit early drafts and a final draft is suggested. Finally, the document advocates for developing a formal revision process where students re-engage with their work and treat papers as thesis-driven attempts to address problems.
This document provides guidance on publishing academic papers. It discusses why publishing is important, what types of papers one can write, where to target publications, when researchers are ready to publish, who should be authors on a paper, and how to go through the publication process. The key steps outlined are identifying a publication opportunity, framing the paper and its contribution, writing drafts, getting feedback, handling revisions, and submitting the paper before a deadline. Conferences are suggested as a good starting point for getting feedback, while journals have higher standards but provide more lasting recognition. Supervisors can provide guidance on positioning work and navigating the publication process.
The document outlines the authoring cycle or writing process, which includes generating ideas from personal experiences, drafting, revising with author's circles, editing conventions, and publishing the final work. It emphasizes starting with students' own experiences, using mini-lessons and modeling to teach genres and techniques, and having students work through multiple drafts with peer feedback before final editing and publication. The goal is to help students improve their writing and view themselves as authors through this recursive process.
This document provides guidance for students writing a paper and developing a digital summary component for a reading education seminar. It outlines the goals of developing in-depth knowledge on a reading topic and creating a practical digital resource. Students are instructed to analyze research articles on their topic and write a paper synthesizing the information. They are provided with tips for structuring the paper, citing sources, using headings, quotes and references. The document also provides guidance on designing an engaging digital summary component to share the key findings of their research with others.
Publishing is a multi-stage process that includes Editing, Design and Typesetting, Proofreading, Printing, Sales, Marketing, and Publicity. Here is a detailed guide for every stage.
This document outlines a seven step plan for co-authoring academic papers with colleagues. It discusses identifying co-authors, discussing the project scope and authorship, targeting journals, writing and revising drafts, and continuing to collaborate throughout the writing process. Challenges like author commitment issues and manuscript rejections are also addressed. The goal is to provide guidance for effective collaboration that results in a successfully published academic paper.
The document outlines the key stages of the writing process: prewriting, drafting, revising and editing. In the prewriting stage, writers determine their audience and purpose, explore their topic, and make a plan. During drafting, writers develop their ideas from the prewriting outline without worrying about minor errors. In the revising stage, writers refine their content and organization. The editing stage focuses on fixing grammatical errors, punctuation, spelling and word choice. Following these stages helps writers organize their thoughts and produce a polished final draft.
This document provides advice and guidance for publishing research ideas and papers. It discusses reasons for writing and reading published articles. It also summarizes statistics around faculty publication rates in the U.S. The document then provides tips for various aspects of publishing including choosing a target journal, structuring papers, writing different sections, using references, the review process, and improving writing in English. Key recommendations include starting with the end in mind by considering publishability early, separating strong ideas into multiple papers, and incorporating English editing.
Similar to Collecting Ideas on Collecting: How to Edit a Collected Work from Concept to Publication (20)
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
Collecting Ideas on Collecting: How to Edit a Collected Work from Concept to Publication
1. Ideas on Collecting:
How to Edit a
Collected Work
from Concept to
Publication
Judith Nixon
Suzanne Ward
Charleston
Conference 2015
1
2. How to Edit a Collected Work
from Concept to Publication
2
Judy Nixon
Sue Ward
• authors
• co-authors
• books editors
• collaborators
, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
3. Outline
Four Stages
1. Thinking & Planning
2. Soliciting Content
3. Evaluating &
Selecting
+ The Gap
4. Editing &
Proofreading
3
4. Thinking & Planning Stage
4
Write about what
you do…
, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
Implementing
Downsizing
Analyze
collection use
5. Thinking & Planning Stage
5
Write about your
collection…
Comp, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
How to
use
collection
Books in
our
collection
Compiled
information
from
collection
6. Thinking & Planning Stage
6
Expand an article
idea…
, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style shet, etc. ?
From
one
article
to many
Developed
a special
issue
We
solicited
colleagues
Then
a
book
7. Thinking & Planning Stage
7
Single editor?
• Allow 2-3 years
• Get help
• Apply for sabbatical / research leave
• Resources needed?
, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
Single
author
Co-edited
Co-editors?
• Allow 1-2 years
• Divide work
• Get help
• Set deadlines
• Create progress
spreadsheet
• Meet / call weekly
• Try intense week
8. Thinking & Planning Stage
8
Editorial
team
• Grammarian?
• Citation
expert?
• Publisher &
author
contact?
• Get expert
help
, proposal, co-editors,
deadlines, style sheet,
I’m an
English
major.
I know APA
style and
use
Endnote.
I’ll
communicate
with the
Press.
I can help
with
graphics.
9. Thinking & Planning Stage
9
Special journal
issue?
proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
Journals
• Welcome ideas
• Suggest authors
• Help with “call for papers”
• Help with peer review
• Quicker publication
• May also issue as a book
We
contacted
editor with
idea
10. Thinking & Planning Stage
10
Book?
proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
Judy contacted
Pierian Press
with this idea
Gale asked
Judy to
compile
this
This topic fit:
Charleston
Insights in
Library,…
• “Editor-reviewed”
• Longer than special
issues
• More prestige
• Deadline flexibility
11. Thinking & Planning Stage
11
Write
proposal
proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
one
page
proposal
Qualifications
Outlined
the book
sections
12. Thinking & Planning Stage
12
Set deadlines
, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style sheet, etc. ?
Start with final
deadline
Work
backwards to
set dates
15. Soliciting Stage
15
Call for Papers
Project description, publisher, major deadlines
Ask for abstract
Send call to listservs
- the “usual suspects”
- other lists
16. 16
Evaluating &
Selecting Stage
Review Abstracts
Eliminate unsuitable ones
- poor writing
- idea not useful
Sort others by theme (rough order)
Choose between similar ones
Make final selection
17. 17
Contact Authors
If NO, encourage to submit elsewhere
If YES ….
schedule phone call to discuss
send contract
send editorial details, deadlines, etc.
Evaluating &
Selecting Stage
18. 18
Work on own contributions
Introduction / Literature Review
Editorial matters
divide editing work
finalize sections / paper order
The gap
20. 20
Editing
Divide work between editors
Be prepared for some heavy editing
Citation management / consistency
Tables & figures
Editing &
Proofreading Stage
Check, check, and check again!
21. Editing &
Proofreading Stage
21
Balancing work
load
• Main + secondary
reader
• Getting expert
opinions
• Peer-reviewed?
, proposal, co-editors, deadlines, style
sheet, etc. ?
Two
editors
for each
chapter
We needed
help with
one paper
22. Editing &
Proofreading Stage
22
Balancing
work load
, proposal, co-editors,
deadlines, style sheet,
etc. ?
theme, proposal, co-
editors, deadlines,
style sheet, etc. ?
We
needed
help with
one paper
Used MS
Word to
track edits
Stored files
on shared
server
23. Editing &
Proofreading Stage
23
Balancing
work load
, proposal, co-editors,
deadlines, style sheet,
etc. ?
Sums across
all 10,974
Reads
Sums across
7,224 Reads of
11 or more
pages
Sums across
3,750 Reads of
less than 11
pages
Minutes 305,024 292,987 12,037
Pages 457,764 439,918 17,846
Sessions 29,884 24,439 5,445
Passages 179,780 172,469 7,311
Paired Passages 170,167 165,245 4,922
Individual Page Turns
Consecutive turns 219,785 211,693 8,092
Jump forward turns 97,571 94,727 2,844
Jump back turns 143,269 138,909 4,360
Passages
Figures
converted to
PGN Images
Expert staff
help with
figures
Redrew
figures for
consistency
24. Working with the publisher
•More editing
•More proofreading
•Check and check
(and check) again
24