The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
Cio Council Erp Update 081309
1. Situation Analysis Growth primarily through rapid acquisition Limited business integration strategy Limited technical strategy Several failed “ERP” implementations Losses: Financial, Time , Effort Limited confidence in potential success of future implementation Autonomous business operations at the campus and division level Limited standardization of business and operating processes and procedures impacting effectiveness of the company Disparate technical environment Multiple Student Systems in place (7) Lack of over arching architecture Lack of Integration strategy Data problems: Consistency, accuracy, availability, integration
28. 55% have resulted in schedule and cost overruns of 178% and 230% respectively
29. Only 10% are completed successfully on budget and on-timeSource: Deloitte Consulting
30. Critical Success Factors Business needs identification Business goals and future organizational needs are often left unformulated or are unclear during planning Action: Create a dedicated cross-functional team to formulate needs up-front Company wide cultural changes Companies must be prepared to make concessions or changes in organizational culture, structure and operational processes Action: Must have executive commitment and discipline to force organizational and process changes. Business unit accountability Business units must be responsible for achieving benefits and managing costs Action: Enlist high level business executive to sponsor and drive the project forward. Tie success to business bonus and performance plans Changing perceptions Companies must often struggle to change perception of from a “shiny new piece of technology” to a new way of doing business
32. Understand ALL the costs Replacing your best and brightest The ERP implementation requires the best and brightest to be successful Be prepared to lose them after the transition to other opportunities Implementation teams can never stop Post-implementation activities keep the teams busy long after the live date Don’t anticipate them going back to their old jobs Waiting for ROI Teams must be prepared to keep going after the install date Returns come long after and require many process changes to take advantage of the ERP system Productivity Impact Recent Deloitte Consulting survey of 64 Fortune 500 Companies, one in four admitted that they suffered a drop in performance when their ERP systems went live Training Driven by new processes and not just new systems Always underestimated Integration and Testing E-commerce and other add-ons, external on all sides Should include the people that will actually operate the system Customization Should be avoided if at all possible Could affect every module Requires vendor support Data Conversion Companies often deny their data is dirty – ours is It costs money to move and clean data Data Analysis Data from the ERP system must be combined with other external systems
33. Adapting to a new ERP “Go-live” Productivity Benefits Implementation ERP “Shock” Discovery Selection Time
34. CCI Approach Align to critical success factors Executive management Support Business Sponsorship Business plan and vision Change management & culture Business process re-engineering (BPR) Acquire, educate and train (people) Vendor selection and support Project Team Dedicated resources
59. School deployment planningSAS Pilot Phased Rollouts by System and School starting in 2Q-07 Training Conversion Pilot Operations SAS Pilot Evaluation Contract Negotiation Online Pilot Training Conversion Pilot Operations Online Evaluation ResourcePlanning School Rollout School Rollout SMS Pilot School Rollout Training Conversion Pilot Operations SMS Pilot Evaluation School Rollout SPAR Pilot ImplementationPlanning Training Conversion Pilot Operations SPAR Pilot Evaluation DecisionGates*: Fund Phase 2 – Pilot Fund Phase 3 Fund Phase 1 – Design and Configuration * Phase Gate Criteria with be applied at each gate review
110. Identify the significant process and organizational changes required to enable the implementation of the preferred solutionIT Team
111. Working team structure Program Management Fredrik de Maré Greg McHugh Cathy Cisneros CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) CCi Lead(s) Student System Core Team Marketing & Admissions Team Lead(s) Academics Team Lead(s) Support Ops & Training Team Lead(s) Career Svcs Team Lead(s) Finance & Accounting Team Lead(s) Reg. Compliance Team Lead(s) IT Team Lead(s) IT Team Training Team Conversion Teams Five Functional Teams Marketing and Admissions Academics Career Services Financial Aid, Finance and Accounting Regulatory Affairs Site Implementation Teams (One per site) (each with School President representation)
112. Core Team members represent both their divisions and respective functional areas 18
113. During the planning phase, significant work was done by the functional teams to enable common and consistent business processes and define system configuration A number of workshops were conducted with the functional teams to: 1 Define a common process framework around which to generate and organize business requirements 2 3 Identify and characterize process differences between divisions for each process area Analyze magnitude of change, and develop recommendations on how to address process differences
119. System CapabilitiesFinancial Aid, Finance & Acctg. Marketing and Admissions Career Services Academics Regulatory Other To-be process flows Business Design Workbooks Screen and report designs The designs are organized into Workbooks Process to screen flow diagrams Scenario storyboards Interface definition Technical Design Workbooks Data element mappings
120. Each site followed a standard conversion approach Site rollout steps and timing Prior to cutover Site readiness prognosis 3 ½ months prior Begin data conversion and purification 3 ½ months prior Organizational assessment 1 month prior Site readiness assessment 1 month prior Begin on-site and remote support 2 weeks prior Finalize any data correction 2 weeks prior Conduct training 1 week prior Cutover weekend of cutover Suspend use of legacy system Convert data Implement new system and organizational and job content changes Terminate on-site support 2 weeks post
121. Training and Organizational Change Standardized Training & OCM plans and processes were put in place to prepare and support campuses through the transition to UNIFY Roles & Responsibilities definition What does this mean to me? What’s in it for me? Divisional Kick-off meetings Recurring Demonstrations- “road show” Recurring Divisional and Campus teams meeting Scheduled pre and post implementation meetings Peer-to-Peer support groups Leadership Reports Training Senn- Delaney Change Workshop – “Embracing UNIFY” Monthly President’s meetings Monthly Newsletter Divisional Trainers Trained Systems and Process training Initial functional training Refresher training Monthly training clinics – topics vary Make-it-Stick processes/ Surveys & Scorecards System adoption and transition metrics