Presented at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable REDD+ carbon and non-carbon results', held from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.

1. • To support REDD+ policy arenas and
practitioner communities with
• information
• analysis
• tools
• to ensure 3E+ outcomes for REDD+:
• effectiveness (to reach C and non-
C benefits)
• (cost-) efficiency
• equity
• + co-benefits
CIFOR’s Global Comparative
Study (GCS-REDD+)

2. Thanks to

3. Research modules,
project phases and
partner-centered
knowledge-sharing

4. Co-production of knowledge
Ownership and use of knowledge
KNOWLEDGE CO-
PRODUCTION
OUTCOMES
Engaged actors:
Learn skills, methods
and tools
Internalise value of 3E
Understand how
evidence can support
3E decision making
Behavior change in
implementers
Access to knowledge Change in
aspirations
Change in state
Sustainable
development
IMPACTS
Program
outcomes
contribute to
global efforts to:
1. Reduce
deforestation
2. Avoid carbon
emissions
3. Achieve non-
carbon
benefits
OUTCOMES
Implementers:
1. Create
enabling
conditions
for…
2. Design and
implement …
3. Assess carbon
and non-
carbon
performance
of…
…REDD+ and
sustainable
private sector
initiatives.
INTERMEDIATE OUTCOME
(IMPLEMENTERS)
Informed implementers in
target countries have the
will, knowledge and
support to implement
INTERMEDIATE OUTCOME
(SUPPORTERS)
Informed supporters
promote, motivate and
enable implementation
OUTPUTS
3E REDD+ knowledge
products and synthesis
KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES
Relevant groupings of actors (national, sub-
national and international policy makers,
private sector, proponents, CSOs, round-tables
& research partners) are engaged across the
research cycle
1.1 REDD+ design (all levels)
1.3 Empowered CSO
(national/subnational level)
3.1. MMRV (national and
international levels)
2.2 Private sector participation in
REDD+ (subnational level)
2.1 Experience-based policy
design
(all levels)
1.2 Transformational change
(national level)
3.2 Improved AFOLU information
(all levels)
4.1. Multilevel governance
(all levels)
4.2 Informed landscape
management (subnational level)
3.3 MMRV capacity
(national and sub-national levels)
4.3 Private sector alignment with
REDD+ (all levels)
5.1 Partner engagement for co-production of knowledge
• Early engagement and trust-building with collaborating partners from all levels and sectors
• Joint definition of relevant research questions
• Co-development of robust, salient, credible and legitimate research
• Delivery, directly or through collaborating partners, of knowledge and tools that partners need

5. Theory of societal transformations: political economy lens
(or: our theory of how change happens – out there)

6. How we engage with partners: Co-production of
science

7. Where we work: The countries of this study

8. GCS REDD output & results: publications, websites…
+ Factsheets: http://www.cifor.org/gcs/publications/factsheets/
+ REDD+ legal studies: http://www.cifor.org/gcs/publications/redd-legal-studies/
+ Safeguards: http://www.cifor.org/gcs/publications/redd-safeguards/
+ over 350 scientific publications: http://www.cifor.org/gcs/publications/
(books thumbnails are hyperlinked)

9. http://www.cifor.org/gcs/landscapes-governance-peru/
GCS REDD output & results: … and tools

10. REDD+ Benefit Sharing Knowledge Tool
http://www.cifor.org/knowledge-tree/

11. GCS-REDD+ - Verified „impact stories“
• Global
• CIFOR contributed to the stepwise approach in setting FRELs/RLs (MRV)
• international expert consultations that led to a UNFCCC decision 2011 for
a stepwise approach on setting, measuring and reporting reference levels
(UNFCC Decision 12/CP17).
• UNREDD made tenure part of its strategy framework based on information
CIFOR generated under this investment (2014)
• National
• CIFOR was influential in Indonesia’s REDD decisions
• Supported FORDA directly and was involved the Indonesian National
REDD+ Strategy development
• Supplied information that informed the GoI's decisions on the forest
moratorium and forest reference emission levels (peatland emission
factors)
• Support to establishment of Indonesia National Carbon Accounting
System (INCAS) in 2015 (funding from the Government of Australia)
• CIFOR research contributed to the Cameroon R-PP and the Peru National
REDD+ Strategy
• CIFOR’s engagement with national technical staff in Guyana and Ethiopia
resulted in both countries adopting CIFOR’s stepwise approach
http://www.odi.org/publications/9932-informing-redd-policy-assessment-cifors-global-comparative-study

12. cifor.org
blog.cifor.org
ForestsTreesAgroforestry.org
THANK YOU!
www.cifor.org/gcs