Effectively Integrating Information Literacy:
A Conversation about Threshold Concepts
and Collaborations
Rebecca K. Miller and Sara M. Crickenberger, Virginia Tech
Conference on Higher Education Pedagogy | February 7, 2014
2
Conversation Overview
• Who we are
• Who you are
• Conversation Session Objectives:
• Explain threshold concepts and information literacy (IL)
threshold concepts
• Describe an example of how IL threshold concepts can be
effectively integrated into a course
• Explore threshold concepts in course and assignment
design
Threshold Concepts
Introduced by Jan Meyer & Ray Land (2003):
Threshold concepts are the core ideas and processes
that define the ways of thinking and practicing for a
discipline, but are so ingrained that they often go
unspoken or unrecognized by practitioners
(Townsend, Brunetti, & Hofer, 2011, p. 854)
3
Criteria
• Criteria for threshold concepts (Meyer & Land, 2003)
• Transformative – causes a shift in perspective
• Integrative – brings together separate concepts
• Irreversible – once grasped, cannot be
ungrasped
• Troublesome – may be counterintuitive
• Bounded – helps define boundaries of a
discipline, or may be unique to a discipline
4
Examples
• Physics: Heat transfer
• Biology: Evolution
• Mathematics: Limits
• Literary and Cultural Studies:
Signification
• Economics: Opportunity cost
5
Threshold Concepts in IL
• Hofer, Townsend, and Brunetti (2012)
• Metadata = findability
• Good searches use database structure
• Format is a process
• Authority is constructed and contextual
• “Primary source” is an exact and conditional category
• Information as a commodity
• Research solves problems
6
Why?
Threshold concepts can help librarians devise
targeted curricula by prioritizing trouble spots….
Learners who cross these thresholds are well
positioned for academic inquiry.
(Hofer, Townsend, & Brunetti, 2012, p. 403)
7
Our Example
• English 1106 at Virginia Tech
• Instructor + Librarian collaboration
• Information Literacy Threshold
Concepts
• Research solves problems
• …and others
8
Adult Learning
• Collaborative
• Problem based
• Relevant
• Immediate/goal oriented
• Reinforcement
• Practical
9
English 1106: Writing from Research
• Collaborative learning process
• Traditional collaborators: Students +
Instructor
• Missing partner: The research expert
• Ideal collaboration = Students + Instructor
+ Research Librarian
10
Problem Based
• First session
• Library environment new/foreign for many
• Eases students into research
• Students reach basic level of understanding/competence
• Works for initial involvement/first projects
• Second session
• Stakes ramped up to biggest research project of semester
• Factors in place to bring students to deeper level of learning
• Opportunity to cross threshold
11
Key Factors
• Relevant: Research is extremely relevant to problem
in front of student
• Immediate/goal oriented: Second session is right
time to deepen skills/understanding of key concepts,
facing finite deadline, definite goal
• Reinforcement: Classroom session reinforces,
builds on skills introduced, used earlier
• Practical: Using students’ laptops simulates their
normal research environment
12
The Threshold
• Crossing the threshold
• Internal motivation
• Self direction
• Both are key factors for adult learners
• Those who are willing to go deeper have the
opportunity and the resources
13
Motivation
Motivation
• Ultimately learners must be internally motivated
• Some lack motivation to cross threshold, are satisfied with surface-level
skills, enough to meet basic requirements
Strategies to enhance motivation
• Allow students to research/write about topics that excite them, capitalize
on life experiences, prior knowledge, existing/personal interests
• Positive reinforcement, including peer review, opportunities to revise,
assessment
14
Success
What success is
• Increased understanding about what a quality research source is
• Ability to find appropriate sources that solve research problem
What success looks like
• More research sources
• More high-quality (peer-reviewed) sources
• Fewer low-quality electronic sources
• The bottom line: stronger research projects/papers
15
Conversation: Question 1
• Do you see any value in threshold
concepts? Why or why not?
16
Conversation: Question 2
• Which information literacy (IL) threshold
concepts seem particularly relevant to
your disciplines and your classrooms?
17
Conversation: Question 3
• How would you integrate any relevant IL
threshold concepts into your teaching?
18
Conversation: Question 4
• Can you identify any on-campus
partners who might be able to assist
and support you in integrating IL
threshold concepts into your teaching?
19
Conversation: Question 5
• What questions do you still have about
IL threshold concepts, or threshold
concepts in general?
20
Further Reading
• Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). (2000). Information literacy competency standards
for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
• Hofer, A. R., Townsend, L., & Brunetti, K. (2012). Troublesome concepts and information literacy:
Investigating threshold concepts for IL instruction. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(4), 387-405.
• Meyer, J. H. F. & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to new
ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. ETL Project Report. Retrieved from
http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/docs/ETLreport4.pdf
• Meyer, J. H. F & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: An introduction. In J.
H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and
troublesome knowledge (pp. 19-32). London: Routledge.
• Townsend, L., Brunetti, K., & Hofer, A. R. (2011). Threshold concepts and information literacy. portal:
Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 853-869.
21
Contact Us
Rebecca K. Miller, University Libraries
millerrk@vt.edu
Sara M. Crickenberger, Dept. of English
smcrick@vt.edu
22

Effectively integrating information literacy: A conversation about threshold concepts and collaborations

  • 1.
    Effectively Integrating InformationLiteracy: A Conversation about Threshold Concepts and Collaborations Rebecca K. Miller and Sara M. Crickenberger, Virginia Tech Conference on Higher Education Pedagogy | February 7, 2014
  • 2.
    2 Conversation Overview • Whowe are • Who you are • Conversation Session Objectives: • Explain threshold concepts and information literacy (IL) threshold concepts • Describe an example of how IL threshold concepts can be effectively integrated into a course • Explore threshold concepts in course and assignment design
  • 3.
    Threshold Concepts Introduced byJan Meyer & Ray Land (2003): Threshold concepts are the core ideas and processes that define the ways of thinking and practicing for a discipline, but are so ingrained that they often go unspoken or unrecognized by practitioners (Townsend, Brunetti, & Hofer, 2011, p. 854) 3
  • 4.
    Criteria • Criteria forthreshold concepts (Meyer & Land, 2003) • Transformative – causes a shift in perspective • Integrative – brings together separate concepts • Irreversible – once grasped, cannot be ungrasped • Troublesome – may be counterintuitive • Bounded – helps define boundaries of a discipline, or may be unique to a discipline 4
  • 5.
    Examples • Physics: Heattransfer • Biology: Evolution • Mathematics: Limits • Literary and Cultural Studies: Signification • Economics: Opportunity cost 5
  • 6.
    Threshold Concepts inIL • Hofer, Townsend, and Brunetti (2012) • Metadata = findability • Good searches use database structure • Format is a process • Authority is constructed and contextual • “Primary source” is an exact and conditional category • Information as a commodity • Research solves problems 6
  • 7.
    Why? Threshold concepts canhelp librarians devise targeted curricula by prioritizing trouble spots…. Learners who cross these thresholds are well positioned for academic inquiry. (Hofer, Townsend, & Brunetti, 2012, p. 403) 7
  • 8.
    Our Example • English1106 at Virginia Tech • Instructor + Librarian collaboration • Information Literacy Threshold Concepts • Research solves problems • …and others 8
  • 9.
    Adult Learning • Collaborative •Problem based • Relevant • Immediate/goal oriented • Reinforcement • Practical 9
  • 10.
    English 1106: Writingfrom Research • Collaborative learning process • Traditional collaborators: Students + Instructor • Missing partner: The research expert • Ideal collaboration = Students + Instructor + Research Librarian 10
  • 11.
    Problem Based • Firstsession • Library environment new/foreign for many • Eases students into research • Students reach basic level of understanding/competence • Works for initial involvement/first projects • Second session • Stakes ramped up to biggest research project of semester • Factors in place to bring students to deeper level of learning • Opportunity to cross threshold 11
  • 12.
    Key Factors • Relevant:Research is extremely relevant to problem in front of student • Immediate/goal oriented: Second session is right time to deepen skills/understanding of key concepts, facing finite deadline, definite goal • Reinforcement: Classroom session reinforces, builds on skills introduced, used earlier • Practical: Using students’ laptops simulates their normal research environment 12
  • 13.
    The Threshold • Crossingthe threshold • Internal motivation • Self direction • Both are key factors for adult learners • Those who are willing to go deeper have the opportunity and the resources 13
  • 14.
    Motivation Motivation • Ultimately learnersmust be internally motivated • Some lack motivation to cross threshold, are satisfied with surface-level skills, enough to meet basic requirements Strategies to enhance motivation • Allow students to research/write about topics that excite them, capitalize on life experiences, prior knowledge, existing/personal interests • Positive reinforcement, including peer review, opportunities to revise, assessment 14
  • 15.
    Success What success is •Increased understanding about what a quality research source is • Ability to find appropriate sources that solve research problem What success looks like • More research sources • More high-quality (peer-reviewed) sources • Fewer low-quality electronic sources • The bottom line: stronger research projects/papers 15
  • 16.
    Conversation: Question 1 •Do you see any value in threshold concepts? Why or why not? 16
  • 17.
    Conversation: Question 2 •Which information literacy (IL) threshold concepts seem particularly relevant to your disciplines and your classrooms? 17
  • 18.
    Conversation: Question 3 •How would you integrate any relevant IL threshold concepts into your teaching? 18
  • 19.
    Conversation: Question 4 •Can you identify any on-campus partners who might be able to assist and support you in integrating IL threshold concepts into your teaching? 19
  • 20.
    Conversation: Question 5 •What questions do you still have about IL threshold concepts, or threshold concepts in general? 20
  • 21.
    Further Reading • Associationof College & Research Libraries (ACRL). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency • Hofer, A. R., Townsend, L., & Brunetti, K. (2012). Troublesome concepts and information literacy: Investigating threshold concepts for IL instruction. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(4), 387-405. • Meyer, J. H. F. & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to new ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. ETL Project Report. Retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/docs/ETLreport4.pdf • Meyer, J. H. F & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: An introduction. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 19-32). London: Routledge. • Townsend, L., Brunetti, K., & Hofer, A. R. (2011). Threshold concepts and information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 853-869. 21
  • 22.
    Contact Us Rebecca K.Miller, University Libraries millerrk@vt.edu Sara M. Crickenberger, Dept. of English smcrick@vt.edu 22