Chin cups are a traditional orthopedic appliance used to treat Class III malocclusions. While some studies have found chin cups can temporarily retard mandibular growth and correct the malocclusion through backward rotation, the effects are not consistently maintained long-term. Meta-analyses found chin cups significantly reduced SNB angle and increased ANB and Wits appraisal in the short-term, but heterogeneity between studies was high. Chin cups also increased SN-ML angle and decreased gonial angle, indicating a tendency for increased vertical growth and posterior mandibular rotation. However, long-term stability and the effects of vertical chin cups require more research due to limited data.

1. The Orthopedic Chin Cap
Prof. Maher fouda
Prepared by
Bilal A. Mohammed
Faculty of dentistry-
Mansoura university - Egypt

2. Background
A number of appliances are available for the treatment of Class III
malocclusion. Among them, chin cup holds a premium position as a
traditional appliance for the early orthopedic treatment of Class III
malocclusion. However, a thorough and in-depth investigation of the
literature reveals controversies and contradictions regarding both its
appropriate use and its clinical effectiveness.

3. Clinical results achieved with the chin cup also constitute a matter of
debate. Retardation or even sometimes restriction of mandibular growth is
supported by some authors (Proffit 2000, Bishara 2001 and Chang HP
2005), while such effects are questioned by others (Mc Namara
2005,Sugauara 2005, Oppenheim 1944, Thilander 1965).
Since no standard protocol has been followed from various clinicians, it is
evident that the effectiveness of the chin cup varies according to the exact
and individualized way of use and it ranges substantially between
investigators from minimal to great.

4. Chin cap

5. • The oldest of the orthopedic approaches to the treatment of
Class III malocclusion.
• - much of the research conducted on Asian populations due to
the higher incidences of Class III malocclusion in these groups.

6. - there are a wide variety of chin cup designs available commercially.
- in general these appliances can be divided into two types:-
1- The occipital-pull chin cup is used in instances of mandibular
prognathism.
2- the vertical-pull chin cup is used in patients with steep mandibular plane
angles and excessive lower anterior facial height.

7. occipital-pull chin cup
- indicated for use in patients with mild to moderate mandibular
prognathism.
- Success is greatest in those patients in the deciduous and
mixed dentition who can bring their incisors close to an edge to
edge position when in centric relation.
- useful particularly in patients who begin treatment with a short
lower anterior facial height, because this type of treatment can
lead to an increase in this dimension.
Soft elastic appliance. The direction of force is
determined by the position of the head cap

8. Soft elastic appliance. The direction of force is determined by the position of the head
cap

9. Force Magnitude and Direction
- Chin cups are divided into two types: the occipital-pull chin cup that is
used for patients with mandibular protrusion and the vertical-pull chin cup
that is used in patients presenting with a steep mandibular plane angle
and excessive anterior facial height.
- Most of the reported studies recommended an orthopedic force of 300-
500 grams per side. Patients are instructed to wear the appliance for 14
hrs/day.

10. Proffit recommended a force of approximately 16 ounces (450 gram) per
side through the head of the condyle or a somewhat lighter force below the
condyle. Once it is accepted that mandibular rotation is the major treatment
effect, lighter force oriented to produce greater rotation makes more sense.
From this perspective, it is apparent that more Asian than Caucasian
children can benefit from chin-cup treatment because of their generally
shorter face height and greater prevalence of lower incisor protrusion, not
because of a difference in the treatment response.

11. -
Once the anterior crossbite was corrected, the patient was
instructed to wear the chin cup at least 10 hours per day until
slight Class II canine and molar relationships were established.

12. Direction of force
- If the pull directed below the condyle, the force of the
may lead to a downward and backward rotation of the
mandible.
- If no opening of the mandibular plane angle is desired, the
should be directed through the condyle to help restrict
mandibular growth.

13. Hickam-type headgear. Used as anchorage for a hard chin cup. The direction of pull can
be adjusted according to the placement of the elastics.

14. - If no increase in lower anterior facial height is desired, the vertical-pull
chin cup can be used.

15. The use of a Hickham-type headcap combined with a hard chin
cup allows for variable vectors of force to be produced on the
lower jaw.
The direction of pull can be adjusted according to the placement of the elastics.

16. A study by Schulz and co-workers that compared the vertical-pull chin cup
combined with the bonded acrylic splint expander to the bonded expander
used alone in high-angle patients indicated that a modest improvement can
be obtained in the mandibular plane angle and in lower anterior facial height
with the use of the vertical-pull chin cup.

17. - One of the easiest of the vertically directed chin cups to manipulate
clinically is shown in the figure below.
- A spring mechanism is activated by pulling the tab inferiorly and
attaching the tab to a hook on the hard chin cup.
The vertical-pull chin cup. A, Unitek design. A spring force design is used to create a vertical direction of
pull.

18. - Another type of chin cup
- produces a vertical direction of force.
- incorporates a cloth headcap that curves around the crown of the head.
- secured posteriorly with two horizontal straps.
- This particular design is useful in those patients in whom anchorage in
the cranial region is difficult to achieve.
B, Summit Orthodontics design. A cloth head cap curves around the crown of the
head and is secured posteriorly with two horizontal straps. The force is produced
by the stretch of the elastic material. In both of these examples, a hard chin cup is
shown.

19. Best patient for Chin cup therapy
Ko et al (2004)
1. Mild Skeletal III, ability to achieve edge to edge incisors
2. Short vertical facial height (.Chincup cause clockwise rotation of the mandible.
3. Proclined or upright LLS (Chincup cause lingual tipping of the lower incisors
(Thilander 1963)
4. Absence of severe facial and dental asymmetry.

20. 5- The earlier the problem is addressed, the more successful treatment
appears to be.
6- Multiple “stages” of active chin cup home wear are often required in order
to be successful in the case of moderate prognathism.
7- The “corrected” patients need to be monitored at 4- to 6-month intervals
until major growth has ceased.

21. 8- The best age is before canine and premolar erupt (CS2-CS3
maturity) this is the first growth spurt of mandible, the second one
when 7 and 8 erupt CS4-CS6 (Bacceti, 2005).

22. - Patients with mandibular excess can usually be recognized in the primary
dentition despite the fact that the mandible appears retrognathic in the
early years for most children.
- There is evidence that treatment to reduce mandibular protrusion is more
successful when it is started in the primary or early mixed dentition. The
treatment time varies from one year to as long as 4 years depending on
the severity of the original malocclusion.

25. (Thilander 1963) and Peter W. Ngan 2014
 Retardation of mandibular growth. Effective at reducing mandibular prognathism
before puberty but this is then lost with continual growth, Sugawara et al., 1990
 Remodelling of the condyle and glenoid fossa
 Backward rotation of the mandible
 Closure of the gonial angle
 Result in lingual tipping of LIS,

26. The effects of chincup therapy
whether the growth of the mandible can be retarded through wearing a
chin cup?
- Sakamoto and co-workers and Wendell and co-workers have noted
decreases in mandibular growth during treatment.
- Wendell and associates noted that the mandibular length increases in
the treated group were only about two-thirds of those observed in the
control group of mixed dentition individuals.
-Mitani and Fukazawa,however, noted no differences in mandibular length
in Class III individuals who began treatment during the adolescent growth
period in comparison with control values.

27. - Graber reported that, in a sample of young Class III patients, the
predominantly horizontal mandibular growth pattern was redirected more
vertically, indicating that the orthopedic chin cup can produce an increase in
lower anterior facial height while correcting the anteroposterior
malrelationship.
- The idea of this appliance is that because the condyle is a growth site, the
growth impeded by extra-oral force (Graber, 1977).

28. - Sugawara and Mitani noted that such treatment seldom alters the
inherited prognathic characteristics of skeletal Class III profiles over the
long term.
- Despite success in animal experiments, most human studies have found
little difference in mandibular dimensions between treated and untreated
subjects (Sugawara et al, 1990).
- Chincup appliances greatly improve the skeletal profile in the short
term, such changes are however rarely maintained during the pubertal
growth spurt.

29. In theory, extraoral force directed against the mandibular condyle would
restrain growth at that location, but there is little or no evidence that this
occurs in humans. What chin-cup therapy does accomplish is a change in
the direction of mandibular growth, rotating the chin down and back, which
makes it less prominent but increases anterior face height. The data seem
to indicate a transitory restraint of growth that is likely to be overwhelmed by
subsequent growth.
Contemporary Orthodontics, 5th Edition proffit

30. In essence, the treatment becomes a trade-off between decreasing the
anteroposterior prominence of the chin and increasing face height. In
addition, lingual tipping of the lower incisors occurs as a result of the
pressure of the appliance on the lower lip and dentition, which often is
undesirable.
Contemporary Orthodontics, 5th
Edition proffit

31. Unfortunately, the majority of Caucasian children with excessive mandibular
growth have normal or excessive face height, so that only small amounts of
mandibular rotation are possible without producing a long-face deformity.
Many of these children ultimately need surgery, and the chin-cup treatment
is essentially transient camouflage. For that reason, it has limited
application.

32. A typical response to chin-cup treatment. A, Pretreatment profile.
B, Posttreatment profile. This treatment reduces mandibular protrusion
primarily by increasing anterior face height, very similar to the effect of Class III
functional appliances.

33. For chin-cup treatment, a hard plastic cup fitted to a cast of the patient's
chin or a soft cup made from an athletic helmet chinstrap can be used. The
more the chin cup or strap migrates up toward the lower lip during appliance
wear, the more lingual movement of the lower incisors will be produced, so
soft cups produce more incisor uprighting than hard ones. The headcap that
includes the spring mechanism can be the same one used for high-pull
headgear.

34. Effects on Maxillary Growth Peter W. Ngan 2014
- Some studies have indicated that a chin cup appliance has no effect on
the anteroposterior growth of the maxilla.
- Uner et al. showed that early correction of anterior crossbite with chin
cup appliance prevents retarded anteroposterior maxillary growth.
- Sugawara et al. compared the growth changes of patients after chin cup
treatment with control subjects and reported that at age17, the midface is
more deficient in patients of the control groups than in those of the
treatment groups.
Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
Editors Peter W. Ngan & Eugene W. Roberts 2014 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

35. Stability of Treatment
- The stability of chin cup treatment remains unclear.
- Several investigators reported stability in horizontal maxillary and
mandibular changes associated with chin cup treatment.
- few studies reported a tendency to return to the original growth pattern
after the chin cup is discontinued.
- Sugarwara and colleagues published a report on the long-term effects of
chin cup therapy on three groups of Japanese girls who started chin cup
treatment at 7, 9, and 11 years. All 63 patients were followed with serial
lateral headfilms taken at the ages of 7, 9, 11, 14, and 17 years.
- the skeletal profile was greatly improved during the initial stages of chin
cup therapy, but these changes were not usually maintained.

36. Reverse chin cup therapy
• Developed in Germany in 2012 by Rahman 2012 show similar result when
the reverse chin cup therapy compared to face mask therapy involving 42 samples
at age of 8-9 years.
• Reverse chin cup therapy is able to produce forward movement of the
maxilla in the growing child associated with lingual tipping of the lower incisors
and labial tipping of the uppers.

37. • The point of application of protraction elastics from the upper
removable appliances was similar for both groups. All patients received
the same protraction force of 500 g per side with a 30 degree
downwards pull.
• The proposed advantages of the new reverse chin cup design were
that it was smaller and less bulky than other protraction appliances,
therefore encouraging children to wear it.

38. Evidance base
Systematic review and meta analysis

39. for growing patients presenting Class III malocclusion and/or open
bite, could chin cup, as compared with no treatment at all, be
beneficial for the improvement of their facial, skeletal and
dentoalveolar characteristics in the short and long term?????

40. Although the initial plan was to investigate the short and long-term effects
of both the occipital and the vertical pull chin cup, due to the limited data
provided from the included articles, only the short-term occipital pull chin
cup effects were finally examined. Consequently, where the term ‘chin cup’
is used thereafter, it is referred to the occipital pull chin cup, and where the
term ‘clinical effects’ is used, it is limited to the short-term ones.

41. Soft tissue, model cast and perioral muscular electromyography data
analyses were also not possible to be performed because no such data
could be retrieved as appropriate for inclusion and analysis in the present
study. Thus, treatment effect comparisons between the experimental groups
were considered just for skeletal and dentoalveolar alterations as measured
on lateral cephalometric radiographs.

42. Effectiveness of chin cup treatment
The common cephalometric variables retrieved from the seven included
treated groups and possible to be examined in current MA were the
following: (a) skeletal variables in the sagittal plane: SNA (°), SNB (°), ANB
(°), Wits appraisal (mm) and Co-Gn (mm); (b) skeletal variables in the
vertical plane: SN-ML (°), gonial angle (°), N-Me (mm), UFH (mm), LAFH
(mm) and Co-Go (mm) and (c) dentoalveolar variables: overjet (mm) and
overbite (mm).

43. The contribution of the original studies to the investigation of each
individual cephalometric variable is presented in this Table.

44. Meta-analyses were performed for the variables SNA, SNB, ANB, Wits
appraisal, SN-ML and gonial angle, where data from five or more treated
groups derived from the included studies contributed in the analysis. For the
rest of the variables, namely Co-Gn, N-Me, UFH, LAFH, Co-Go, overjet and
overbite, where data from four or less treated groups contributed in the
analysis, exploratory analyses were performed.

45. With regard to the skeletal cephalometric changes in the sagittal plane, it
was revealed that there was statistically significant reduction in the SNB
angle of the patients treated with the chin cup in comparison to the
untreated individuals (SDM = −1.97, CI = −3.09 to −0.84, P = 0.001),
indicating a restriction effect on mandibular growth.

46. In addition, Class III malocclusion of treated patients was significantly
improved since there was a statistically significant increase following chin
cup use in comparison to untreated individuals to (a) the ANB angle (SDM
= 2.48, CI = 1.36 to 3.61, P = 0.000) and (b) the Wits appraisal (SDM =
3.62, CI = 1.32 to 5.92, P = 0.002).
However, for all these three variables, the observed data heterogeneity as
well as the between-studies variance was high.

47. With regard to the skeletal cephalometric changes in the vertical plane, the
results of the MA revealed that the SN-ML angle increased significantly
whereas the gonial angle decreased significantly in the patients treated
with the chin cup as compared with the untreated individuals (SDM = 1.17,
CI = 0.48 to 1.86, P = 0.001 and SDM = −0.80, CI = −1.52 to −0.08, P =
0.030, respectively), indicating a tendency towards an increase of the
vertical growth pattern and/ or posterior rotation of the mandible.

48. However, data heterogeneity of the included studies was moderate to
high, and the between-studies variance was moderate.
The tendency towards increase of the anterior face height is further
supported by the statistically significant increase of the linear variable N-Me
according to the exploratory analysis performed (SDM = 1.39, CI = 0.59 to
2.18, P = 0.001). Moderate data heterogeneity of the included studies and
small between studies variance were also observed here.

49. As far as the dentoalveolar changes are concerned, the results of the
exploratory analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant
increase of overjet in the patients treated with the chin cup in comparison
to the untreated individuals (SDM = 2.62, CI = 1.06 to 4.19, P = 0.001),
indicating an improvement of the antero-posterior relations of the maxillary
and mandibular incisors. Yet, data heterogeneity observed in the included
studies, as well as the between studies variance, was high.

50. For the rest of the variables, namely SNA, Co-Gn, UFH, LAFH, Co-Go and
overbite, no statistically significant differences were derived.
Finally, due to the limited data provided from the included articles, no long-
term effects following the use of the occipital chin cup, as well as no short-
and long-term effects of the vertical pull chin cup, could be investigated.

51. Conclusions
Although the aim of this investigation was to assess the short- and long-
term effects of both the occipital and the vertical pull chin cup, due to the
lack of appropriate data of the included articles, only the short-term occipital
pull chin cup effects were possible to be assessed. In addition, soft tissue,
model cast and perioral muscular electromyography data analyses were
also not possible to be performed for the same reasons.

52. Thus, according to the results of this investigation, it can be concluded that
following the use of occipital pull chin cup for the short-term management of
growing patients with Class III malocclusion before pubertal spurt, an overall
significant improvement of the skeletal and dentoalveolar relationships
takes place in comparison to untreated individuals. In detail, data
elaboration leaded to the following conclusions:
- The skeletal Class III sagittal relationships of the maxilla and mandible are
improved.
- The skeletal Class III vertical relationships are also affected towards an
increase of the vertical growth pattern, an increase of the anterior face
height, and/ or posterior rotation of the mandible.
- The antero-posterior relations of the maxillary and mandibular incisors, as
indicated by the increase of overjet, are improved.

53. Nevertheless, the limited number of included studies, the high heterogeneity
observed in most of the variables and the linear manner of many of them
suggest some precaution in the interpretation of these conclusions. It
seems that there is not enough evidence-based data to make definitive
recommendations about the chin cup treatment.
More high-quality evidence-based clinical trials with proper design, sample
size, appliance use and measurements nare needed in the future in order to
reach more reliable results concerning the chin cup treatment of Class III
malocclusion in the short and the long term.

54. Studies and case reports

55. A comparison of chincap and maxillary protraction
appliances in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions

56. Material and methods
Lateral ccphalomctric radiographs o f 168 previously treated skeletal Class III
malocclusion patients wrre traced an d digitized. They were evaluated with the JOE
program (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics JO E Version S.O'Denver. USA ). This
program makes considerations about the malocclusion type and its origin by
analysis of several ccphalomctric parameters. Sagittal considerations made by this
program are based on facial depth (NPg/frankfort horizontal), maxillary
depth (NA/Frankfort horizontal) and corpus length (Xi-Pg). After the evaluation o f
the 168 cases, the considerations in the program showed that only 24 cases had a
skeletal Class III malocclusion with a combination of maxillary retrusion and
mandibular protrusion. Others were either maxillary retrusion or mandibular
protrusion cases.

57. When the treatment types of the 24 skeletal Class III cases with a
combination o f maxillary retrusion and mandibular protrusion were
investigated.
it was found that 12 subjects were treated with chincap appliances and 12
with a maxillary protraction appliance.
The first group o f 12 patients (six girls and six boys) with a mean age o f
11.03 years were treated with a chincap an d mandibular occlusal bite plate.

58. 'Ihe chincap applied a total force of 600g. The patients were instructed to wear the
appliance for at least 14-16 hours a day.
The second group comprised 12 children (seven girts and five boys) with a mean
age 10.72 years Maxillary protraction therapy was applied in this group. They were
treated by using Dclairc type orthopaedic faccnusk and a removableintra-oral
appliance with an anterior point application.

59. The total force applied was 600 g and the patients were instructed to wear
the appliance for approximately 16 hours a day. When a normal dental
relationship was obtained with a 2-3 mm overjet. lateral ccphalometric
radiographs were taken in both groups The treatment time was 10.0 months
for the chincap group and 11.7 months foe the maxillary protraction group.
Results
The statistical comparison of the pre – treatment values be tween the groups sho we
dsignificant differences in upper incisor/N A relations ( degree -mm )

60. C hine cap group
SNB and facial axis showe dsignificant d ecreases in the chin cap group .
There was astatistically significant increase in this group in Co –A, ramus
height , ANB , lower face height and anterior and posterior face heights .
Evaluation of dental relationships during chincap therapy showed
Significant increases in upper incisor -NA (mm ) and over jet Angular and
dimensional parameters For lower incisor -NB and molar relationship
showed a significant decrease in this group. Soft tissue analysis
demonstrated a significant increase in upper lip length an d a significant
decrease in nasolabial length.

61. Face mask group
S-N length. SNA. C o -A. SMGoGn. Ramus height. Co-Gn. ANB. lower face
height, and anterior and posterior face heights showed a significant
increase at the en d o f the orthopaedic face mask therapy. Significant
decreases were observed in SNB. facial depth, facial axis, and maxllo-
mandibular differential. The inter-incisal
angle significantly decreased. There was a significant increase in overjet.
and significant decreases in overbite and molar relationship in the
maxillary protraction group. Evaluation of the soft tissues demonstrated a
significant increase in upper lip length.

62. Comparison o f chincap and face mask therapy
The SNA angle increased significantly more in the maxillary
protraction group compared with the chincap group. Angular and
dimensional
parameters for lower incisor-NB showed significant differences
between the groups. There was a significantly greater increase in
the molar relationship in the maxillary protraction group than in
the chincap group. While the nasolabial angle significantly
decreased in the chincap group, there was a non-significant
increase in the maxillary protraction group and the difference
between the groups was statistically significant.

63. Chin cup treatment for class III maloclussions: little evidence
to assess impact on temporomandibular joint
Posted by
Derek Richards

64. Methods
Searches were conducted in Medline/PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Oral
Health Group’s Trials Register, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, the National
Research Register, and Pro-Quest Dissertation Abstracts and Thesis
database. Prospective and retrospective studies, including randomized
clinical trials(RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and other observational
studies were considered in this review. Studies with or without auxiliaries,
such as lingual arches or other intraoral mechanotherapies that had
outcomes including morphological adaptations of the TMJ, changes of
the condylar configuration, dysfunctions caused by the chin-cup therapy,
and incidence and types of TMD were included. Study selection, data
abstraction a quality assessment was carried out independently by two
reviewers.

65. Results
• 12 studies were included
• 8 were prospective, 4 retrospective. There were no RCTs.
• One of the prospective studies was considered to be at low risk of
bias.
• 5 studies considered chin-cup influence on craniofacial structures and
condylar shape
• 7 studies considered chin-cup influence on TMD
• A qualitative summary of the studies was presented. This suggests
that:-
o chin-cup therapy affects the condylar growth pattern, even though
two studies reported no significance changes in disc position and arthrosis
configuration
o chin-cup therapy constitutes no risk factor for TMD.

66. Conclusions
The authors concluded
Based on the available evidence, chin-cup therapy for Class III orthodontic
anomaly seems to induce craniofacial adaptations. Nevertheless, there are
insufficient or low-quality data in the orthodontic literature to allow the
formulation of clear statements regarding the influence of chin-cup
treatment on the temporomandibular joint.

67. Chin Cup Therapy: An Effective Tool for the Correction of
Class III Malocclusion in Mixed and Late Deciduous
Dentitions
The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society,
October-December 2010;44(4):109-114

68. In Class III malocclusion, it is the treatment objective to restrain all possible
horizontal mandibular growth, or at least redirect it into a more vertical vector as
the maxilla continues to grow downward and forward. Since Class III faces tend to
become more prognathic, and cause unfavorable muscle and tooth adjustments, it is
good interceptive dentofacial orthopedics to place appliances early where there is
Class III malocclusion.
Therapy should eliminate the malrelationship in any event. Many pseudo Class III
cases have a tendency to become full blown Class III later on during the growth
period unless treated.

69. The ideal patient for chin cup or functional appliance treatment of excessive
mandibular growth has:
1. A mild skeletal problem with the ability to bring the incisors end-to-end or
nearly so
2. Short vertical face height
3. Normally positioned or protrusive, but not retrusive lower incisors.

70. What chin cup therapy does accomplish is lingual tipping of the lower incisors as a
result of the pressure of the appliance on the lower lip and dentition and a change in
the direction of mandibular growth, rotating the chin down and back. Children who
have increased lower anterior face height and are treated with chin cups may end up
with skeletal open bites after treatment. Chin cups are divided into two types:
1. The occipital-pull chin cup, more frequently used in cases of mandibular
prognathism and,
2. Vertical-pull chin cup that is used in cases of steep mandibular plane angle and
excessive anterior facial height, the so-called “backward rotator” patient with
openbite.

71. The time duration of chin cup wear depends on the age when the appliance is
placed and the magnitude of the malocclusion as well as the amount and direction
of growth at the time.
After the correction of a pre-existing anterior crossbite has been accomplished, the
patient wears the appliance during the night only as a retention appliance.

72. CASE REPORTS
Case 1
A female patient aged 7 years reported to the Department of Orthodontics and
Dentofacial Orthopedics with a chief complaint of forwardly placed lower front
teeth.
On examination, she was brachyfacial, had a concave profile, an everted lower lip
with a deep mentolabial sulcus.

73. Intraorally, she had a mesial step terminal plane on right and left side. The overjet
was 1 mm and overbite was also 1 mm with a posterior crossbite on right side.

74. Cephalometric analysis showed a Class III skeletal tendency, a horizontal growth
pattern, a decreased lower anterior facial height and proclined upper and lower
incisors.
The patient was treated with a chin cup therapywith a slow maxillary expansion
(SME) screw to correct right side posterior crossbite along with Z spring to procline
the left central incisor for the correction of anterior crossbite.

75. After 11 months of treatment, forward growth of maxilla was observed with
restricted growth of mandible and a normal interarch relationship with increased
lower anterior facial height obtained. We have a follow-up of almost 2 years post-
treatment.
Post-treatment extraoral (case 1)

78. Presently, the patient is wearing chin cup only at night time for retention. Fixed
mechnotherapy will be initiated after eruption of all permanent teeth, if required.

79. Case 2
A male patient aged 10 years reported to the Department of Orthodontics and
Dentofacial Orthopedics with a chief complaint of forwardly placed lower front
teeth.
On examination, he was found mesofacial, had a concave profile, an everted
lower lip with a deep mentolabial sulcus.

80. Intraorally, he had a mesial step terminal plane on right and left side. The overjet
was 1 mm and overbite was 2 mm with mildly crowded lower anterior teeth

81. Cephalometric analysis showed a Class III skeletal tendency, a horizontal growth
pattern, a decreased lower anterior facial height and proclinated upper and lower
incisors. The patient was treated with a chin cup therapy.

82. After 13 months of treatment, forward growth of maxilla was observed with
restricted growth of mandible and a normal interarch relationship with increased
lower anterior facial height obtained.

83. for retention the patient worn the chin cup only at night time. Fixed mechnotherapy
will be initiated after eruption of all permanent teeth.

84. The question concerning the ability to alter the mandibular growth pattern with a
chin cup should be regarded in the light of all the variables that may influence
growth. Previous studies on the effects of the chin cup force on growing human
mandibles have reported various results. There have been a number of clinical
studies that have evaluated the treatment effects produced by chin cup therapy.1-4
These studies have shown treatment effects that are somewhat distinct from those
discussed earlier regarding the orthopedic facial mask and the FR-3 of Frankel.

85. One of the substantive concerns, particularly in the treatment of the patient with
mandibular prognathism, is whether the growth of the mandible can be retarded
during treatment.
Wendell2 et al (1985) have noted decrease in mandibular growth during treatment.
Wendell2 et al when examining a group of Class III patients treated in the mixed
dentition noted that mandibular length increased for the treated group were only 60
to 68% of the control group. Mitani and Fukazawa3 (1976) noted no differences in
mandibular length in Class III patients who began treatment during the adolescent
growth period. These findings support the observations of Sakamoto1 (1981) and
Sugawara4 et al (1990) who advocate the use of the occipitalpull chin cup as early as
is practical. Whether the ultimate length of the mandible can be influenced by chin
cup therapy still remains unclear.

86. The Effects of Chin Cup Therapy on the Mandible:
A Longitudinal Study
Peter D. Wendell
University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine,
Farmington, Conn , 1983
Am. j. Orthod.
Februry 1984

87. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of chin cup therapy on the
mandible and its dentition in skeletal Class III patients. The patients
selected for this study were Japanese females treated only with the
extraoral chin cup appliance. Both the control and treatment samples were
obtained from Japanese universities, where these longitudinal data were
gathered. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken on the average
every 6 months for the treatment group and every year for the control group.

88. Ten treated patients and seven control subjects were studied. The duration
of chin cup therapy was variable but averaged 3 years 1 month. The
cephalograms were digitized on an electronic screen, and a cephalometric
analysis was recorded from a computer program. A Cartesian coordinate
system was used to enable measurement relative to given x and y
reference lines. Subsequent cephalograms for a patient were
superimposed, using detailed cranial base structures. The cephalometric
measurements were plotted against the patient’s chronologic age in order to
obtain a rate-of-change value from a regression line.

91. The rate-of-change values were then
compared with the control group to yield
comparison of changes in mandibular growth
rate, direction, and pattern in the treatment
group. Active and posttreatment effects were
evaluated: (1) All measurements for the rate
of change of absolute mandibular length
(ramal length, body length, and total
mandibular length) were reduced by 60% to
68% from the control rate of growth during
therapy. These parameters continued to
show a decrease of 55% to 61% following
active treatment. (2) The mandible exhibited
less downward displacement.
relative to cranial base, during treatment.

93. (3) The mandibular plane angle and the gonial angle closed with growth in
the Class III control sample but were variable in the treatment group. (4)
The skeletal profile was improved with treatment. (5) Dental changes
indicated that an orthopedic correction occurred so that the dentition
exhibited a more normal migratory displacement into a favorable Class I
occlusion. This study indicates that the chin cup may be a viable mode of
treatment for preadolescent and adolescent mandibular prognathism
patients.

94. Chin Cap Force to a Growing Mandible
Lone-term clinical reports

95. The cases reported in this study were three Japanese females who had
undergone several years o f chin cap treatment.
The sample includes different types of prognathic skeletal patterns in
terms of the relative size or position o f maxilla and mandible.
A chin cap was applied to the mandible with a force o f 500-600gm at
the chin during the treatment period. The applied force was directed
toward the condylar head o f the mandible
within a small range of variation. The design
o f the chin cap is shown in Fig. 1.

96. The type of chin cap appliance
used by the patients in this
study. The cup was pulled up
by on rubber elastic on each
side, with ends attached on
different straps. Average force
level at the chin ranged
from 500-600gm.

97. Measurements used in this study. The long axis of the condyle is drawn
through the midpoints of the widest and narrowest parts o f the head and
neck.The condyle point, Cd, is located by the intersection of the long
axis with the condyle surface. Linear measurements are made between the
established points. The gonial angle is centered on Go and measured to the
tangent lines.

98. The investigation is based on serial lateral cephalometric radiographs
taken at three-month intervals, along with semiannual records o f
standing height and wristhand radiographs. Each subject maintained
time tables in which every hour of chin cap use was recorded.
Two o f these cases were treated with a chin cap as an adjunct to an
intraoral appliance for several years, and one was treated solely with a
chin cap. Since two cases were treated orthodontically along with a
chin cap, the changes in the face may include treatment effects other
than those produced by the chin cap therapy. However, the study was
based on the area where orthodontic therapy is thought to be least
effective.

99. The cephalometric points, planes and diagram for angular and linear
measurements employed in this study are shown below. These include overall
mandibular length (Cd-Pog), mandibular body length (Go-Pog), mandibular
ramus length (Cd-Go), and the gonial angle. Measurements were made every six
months. The individual growth data for each point was then combined on a
graph to describe the semiannual incremental changes.

100. Case report
a female, with X first records taken at eight years and four months o f
age. The lateral cephalometric diagram shows an evident depression o
f the middle face as well as a remarkable protrusion o f the chin when
compared with the normal pattern for this age. It also indicated a
procumbent mandibular plane and some upward and forward
rotation o f the mandible. Mandibular movements to all functional
positions were felt to be smooth and normal, but a forward
positioning of the mandible was noted during occlusion.
From the rest to occlusal position, the central incisors showed a
premature contact. The mandible then shifted forward to gain buccal
occlusion. Airway was clear and showed no pathological breathing
problem.

101. Case 1 (age 8yr 4mo), cephalometric diagram. Broken line outlines
average female face at age 7yr 7mo ± 18mo. Superimposition is on
Nasion, oriented on Frankfort horizontal. Black indicates patient
outside the average outline, shading indicates patient inside the
average outline.

102. Dental occlusion shows crossbite o f the incisors, deep overbite and
noticeable underjet. This patient was treated with a chin cap and
intraoral appliance. The figure below shows the occlusion on the final
record taken at the age o f 17 years and 4 months. The cephalometric
diagram shows the size and position o f the mandible to be fairly well
balanced, yet the middle face is still retarded in relation to the normal
pattern.

105. Superimposition o f the radiographs on the anterior cranial base
structures during wear o f a chin cap shows a dramatic change in
mandibular position.
This change occurred through correction of the functional forward
positioning o f the mandible. After the change o f the position,
forward growth o f the chin was more inhibited, and the chin was
displaced downward. Superimposition after discontinuation o f the
chin cap shows almost no skeletal change. The changes accomplished
during chin cap wear seemed to be retained well.

108. Superimposition o f the mandible on the mandibular plane at menton shows
peculiar change during the active chin cap period, with growth at the
condyle as well as the posterior border of the ramus, and a decrease in the gonial
angle.

109. Chin cup effects using two different force magnitudes
in the management of Class III malocclusions
Yasser L. Abdelnabya; Essam A. Nassarb

110. Fifty growing patients were selected for this study (26 boys and 24 girls).
They were selected according to the following criteria: skeletal Class III
pattern (ANB angle , 1 degree) and protrusive mandible (SNB angle . 80
degrees). All patients had anterior crossbite.
Hand-wrist radiographs were obtained for each patient to assess skeletal
maturation.
All patients had not passed the peak of pubertal growth spurt, as shown by
the epiphysis of the middle phalanx of the third finger having capped its
diaphysis. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group 1
consisted of 20 patients (10 boys and 10 girls), group 2 consisted of 20
patients (11 girls and 9 boys), and group 3 consisted of 10 patients (5 boys
and 5 girls).
The mean ages at the start of treatment were 9.6, 10.1, and 9.2 years for
groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

111. Patients in groups 1 and 2 were treated with an occipital pull chin cup
(Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) and an acrylic occlusal bite plane with a
thickness that just freed the occlusion anteriorly. The chin cup used was
soft not acrylic. The force magnitude exerted by the chin cup was 600 g per
side in group 1 and 300 g per side in group 2. A force gauge (Somfy tec,
France) was utilized to determine the applied force. The patients were
instructed to wear the appliances for 14 hours each day. In group 3, the
patients did not receive any orthodontic or orthopedic treatment during the
study period.

112. Lateral cephalogram films were taken for all patients at two stages: before
the start of treatment and after 1 year. All films were traced by one
investigator. Measurements obtained were corrected for standard
magnification. The cephalometric films were retraced and the method error
was determined with Dalhberg’s formula; the error was less than 1 mm and
1 degree.

113. Clinically the anterior crossbite was corrected in all patients in the two
treatment groups (Figures 1and 2).
In general, there were significant differencesin the changes in
cephalometric measurements between the two treatment groups and the
control group regarding mandibular position (SNB angle), the
maxillomandibular relationship (ANB angle and Wits appraisal), ramus
height (Ar-Go), vertical measurements (N-Me and SN-MP angle), and
inclination of the mandibular incisors (1-MP). In the treatment groups, the
SNB angle, ramus height, and mandibular incisor inclinations were
significantly decreased in comparison to the control group. The ANB angle,
Wits appraisal, SN-MP angle, and anterior facial height were significantly
increased in the two treatment groups.
RESULTS

114. Figure 1. Pre and posttreatment intraoral photographs of patient utilized
chin cup with 600 grams of force per side.

115. Figure 2. Pre and posttreatment intraoral photographs of patient
utilized chin cup with 300 grams of force per side.

116. Regarding the differences in the changes in cephalometric measurements
between the two treatment groups utilizing either force magnitude (600 vs
300 g per side), no significant differences were found except in ramus
height (Ar-Go). The reduction in ramus height was more pronounced with
the utilization of 600 g of force per side than the use of 300 g of force
per side.

117. Chin cup therapy for mandibular prognathism
lee W. Graber, D.D.S., M.S., MS.
Am. .J. O&hod. July 1977 volume 72 no.1

119. Thirty patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion under treatment
with the chin cup appliance, averaging 6 years of age at the start of
treatment, were followed longitudinally for a 3-year period. This treatment
sample was compared cephalometrically with an analogous untreated Class
III sample.
The following significant craniofacial alterations were noted in the sample
that underwent orthopedic chin cup therapy:
1. A retardation of vertical ramus growth.
2. A retardation of vertical development in the posterior aspect of the
mandibular body.
3. A retardation

120. 3. A retardation of vertical development in the posterior maxilla.
4. A closure of the gonial angle.
5. A distal rotation of the mandibular complex.
6. A decreased amount of anteroposterior anterior cranial base growth.
7. A redirection of the predominantly horizontal mandibular growth
pattern to a more vertical direction.
8. A reduction of the maxillomandibu1a.r malrelationship toward
normative values.
9. A production of an Angle Class I dental relationship following the
establishment of normal maxillomandibular relations.
10. A lack of detectable localized effect on the symphyseal region or
incisor position as a direct result of chin cup placement and pressure.
11. Development of soft-tissue profile changes in harmony with underlying
skeletal changes.
While all of the listed

121. gain increased importance when considered together. With orthopedic chin
cup therapy, there is a change in craniofacial pattern leading to the
observed resolution of the Angle skeletal Class III malocclusion. This study
thus provides strong support for the use of the orthopedic-force chin cup
appliance in the clinical management of young patients with skeletal
mandibular prognathism.

122. Major contributions to correction of the Class III skeletal malocclusion. 1, The mandible
rotated posteriorly, placing the ramus in a more vertical orientation to the cranial
base; 2, the gonial angle was decreased, re-establishing the mandibular plane by
overcoming changes introduced by posterior mandibular rotation; 3, vertical condylar
growth was restricted; 4, the maxilla rotated slightly in a “clockwise” direction.

123. Evidence-Based Orthodontics
Edited by
Greg J. Huang, DMD, MSD, MPH
Stephen Richmond, BDS, DOrth RCS, MScD,
FDSRCS, PhD, FHEA
Katherine W.L. Vig, BDS, MS, DOrth RCS, FDSRCS
A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication
This edition fi rst published 2011 © 2011 by Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.

124. A chin cup was initially thought to reduce the growth of a prognathic
mandible.
Although animal studies indicated the possibility of altering condylar growth
(Petrovic, Stutzmann & Oudet 1975 ; Copray, Jansen & Duterloo 1985 ;
Vardimon et al. 1994 ), clinical research reveals initial changes within the
skeleton that were rarely maintained during pubertal growth (Sugawara &
Mitani 1993 ). The separate effect of the chin cup versus maxillary
protraction is not known and would be difficult to determine. The chin cup
may have an additive influence, maximizing the effect of the protraction,
and/or mandibular rotation.