Microbiome and Cancer
• All the epithelial barriers of our body harbor
different densities of commensal microorganisms
• The microbiota—including eubacteria, archaea,
protists, fungi, and viruses mostly exhibits
commensalism with the host.
• Approximately 3 × 1013 bacterial cells present in
human body, particularly abundant in lower
intestine.
• The number of microbial genes in the microbiota is
more than 100 times higher than that of human genes.
• mutualism between the human and the microbial cells
modulates most physiologic functions.
• Unlike our own genome that is fixed, the microbiota
metagenome can respond to environmental stimuli
with rapid alteration of different strains, exchange of
genetic elements, and mutations.
• Factors affecting microbiota :
– host genetics
– colonization at the time of birth
– type of birth delivery
– individual lifestyle
– diseases
– exposure to antibiotics
• Sequencing of one or more variable regions of the
gene-encoding 16S rRNA is the most widely used
method for the identification of bacterial and archaeal
taxa.
• Identification of fungi relies on sequencing the internal
transcribed spacer region between the 18S and 28S
rRNAs.
• Shotgun sequencing of the whole microbial
metagenome allows a better taxonomic classification
at species level
• Microbiota also plays an important role in the
cancer process affecting predisposing conditions,
initiation, progression, response to therapy.
• The composition of the microbiota and
particularly of the very abundant gut microbiota
modulates the tumor microenvironment and
affects tumor growth both at the level of the
epithelial barriers and systemically
Bacteria as Cause of cancer
• mostly limited to cancers of the GI tract and of
the lung and based on the analysis of oral, fecal,
and tissue samples.
• Helicobacter pylori is the only bacterial species
recognized as a group 1 human carcinogen.
• Dysbiosis or changes in the abundance of
microbial families observed in the patients may
be a consequence rather than a cause of cancer
• The microorganisms that were involved in cancer
initiation may no longer be present when the
patients are studied.
• Except for H. pylori, none of the bacteria
associated with human cancer has been formally
proven to be a human carcinogen
• However, mechanistic studies in mice are starting
to provide evidence of a direct role in colon
carcinogenesis for several bacterial species
• Although these mechanisms have been
studied primarily for intestinal microbiota,
microbes colonizing other epithelial barriers
(e.g., the oral cavity and the skin) are also
expected to mediate both local and systemic
effects.
H Pylori and Ca Stomach
• H. pylori is epidemiologically associated with
noncardia gastric carcinoma and lymphoma.
• In most individuals it causes only gastritis but
in a few patients, it causes serious pathologic
lesions including atrophy, metaplasia, and
cancer
• Two toxin-encoding genes cytotoxinassociated
gene A (cagA) and vacuolating gene (vacA) are
present in virulent and carcinogenic strains of
H. Pylori.
• H. pylori directly can affect genetic integrity of
gastric epithelial cells by inducing DNA
damage.
• Development of gastric cancer requires a
multidecade exposure to the bacterium
associated with:
– inflammatory response inducing epithelium injury
– atrophy
– reduction in acid secretory functions
– metaplasia.
• Atrophic gastritis results in dysbiosis and
gastric colonization with cancer-provoking
bacterial species of oropharyngeal or
intestinal origin.
• Eradication of H. pylori may enhance
susceptibility to asthma and obesity as well as
gastroesophageal reflux with increased risk of
gastric cardia and esophageal carcinoma.
• H pylori causes intestinal metaplasia leading
to intestinal type of gastric adenocarcinoma.
• The intestinal type of sporadic gastric
adenocarcinoma has a hallmark progression
from normal gastric epithelium, to chronic
atrophic gastritis (typically due to Helicobacter
pylori infection) to intestinal metaplasia to
dysplasia
Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer
• Interaction between microbiota and host is
particularly evident in the lower
gastrointestinal tract harboring the largest
number of bacteria.
• Fusobacterium – normally form dental
biofilms commonly found in colonic adenomas
and adenocarcinomas.
• F. nucleatum has been proposed to be
procarcinogenic:
– by recruiting tumor-promoting myeloid cells
– promoting chemo resistance by modulating
autophagy
– inhibiting NK and T-cell activity via binding of its Fap2
protein to the TIGIT inhibitory receptor and activating
β- catenin/Wnt signaling in epithelial cells by
association of its FadA adhesin to E-cadherin
• FadA gene transcripts are expressed at
significantly higher levels in the colon of
patients with colorectal carcinoma
• thus can be used as a diagnostic marker and
therapeutic target
• Fusobacteria biofilms produce the polyamine
metabolite N1,N12-diacetylspermine.
– Enhance epithelial proliferation
– diminish E-cadherin expression
– activate STAT3 and interleukin (IL)-6.
Genotoxic Effects
• Toxins injectedvia type 3 secretion :
– Cell toxicity via apoptosis
– Repression of proton pump expression
• Microbial metabolites :
– Products of protien – hydrogen sulphide, cresol
– Products of bile degradation
– Breakdown of liver detoxified xenobiotics
• Genomic instability :
– Damages P53, MSH2, MLH 1
• DNA damaging toxins :
– Colibactin – E.coli - disrupts SUMOylation of p53 and
leads to production of proinflammatory and growth
factors with tumor-promoting ability.
– Cytolethal distending toxins ( CDTs) – E.coli,
S.eneterica, C. jejuni
• Translocation through barrier causing
recruitment of myeloid cells
• Causes activation of ROS resulting in DNA
damage
Activation of Cell proliferation
• Fad A – Fusobacterium
• Cag A – H. Pylori
• BFT – Bacteroids toxin
• Avirulence protien A – S enterica
• Cause detachment of beta catenin from E
cadherin and cause activation of beta catenin
pathway
• H pylori and S enterica lead to PI3K/AKT and
MAPK/ERK pathway activation.
Modulation of host
immunity
• IL 22 and IL 6 – promote colon cancer via
activation of STAT 3
• IL-18/IL-22 axis plays a particularly important
role in maintaining mucosal homeostasis.
Inflammasomes (NLRP3 and/or NLRP6)
↓
activated by bacterial derived small chain fatty
acids (SCFAs) via GPR43 and GPR109a
receptors.
↓
epithelial cell production of pro-IL-18 that is
cleaved into active IL-18
IL-18 then blocks macrophage production of the
soluble IL-22 antagonist IL-22BP
↓
increased production and bioavailability of IL-22
↓
IL-22 induces STAT3 phosphorylation in epithelial
cells:
– promoting proliferation,
– secretion of antibacterial peptides
– in a positive feedback loop, enhances production of IL-
18.
Immunosupressive Mechanisms
• F. nucleatum promotes accumulation of
immunosuppressive myeloid cells
• produces the Fap2 protein
• activates the inhibitory receptor TIGIT on NK and
T-cells.
• SCFAs induce regulatory T (Treg) cells that inhibit
local immune response
• Limited data on carcinogenic potential outside
GIT
• possible contribution to cancers of the skin,
the oropharyngeal cavity, the lung, and the
urogenital tract need to be better investigated
• the role of microorganisms other than bacteria and viruses
on carcinogenesis remains to be better defined.
• Fungal infection with production of the carcinogenic
acetaldehyde in patients with autoimmune
polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis ectodermal dystrophy
• leads to mutations in the AIRE gene has been proposed to
play a role in the oral and esophageal cancer observed in
these patients.
• Additionally, other members of our microbiota could also
contribute to cancer including protists and helminths.
Tumors in other tissues
• microbiota can also affect the development of tumors in
sterile tissues that are not in direct contact with the
bacteria.
• modulate cancer-predisposing conditions such as metabolic
disease and obesity.
• β-glucuronidases and β-glucuronides participate in
estrogen metabolism.
• affect endometrial and breast cancer through a non
inflammatory pathway.
Bacteria as Cancer Drugs
• William Coley observed that acute infections may
be followed by tumor regression.
• In a number of patients with soft tissue sarcoma
he used “Coley’s toxins,” a combination of
Streptococcus pyogenes and gram-negative
Bacillus prodigiosus.
• local treatment with BCG, an attenuated
Mycobacterium bovis strain, is still a widely used
therapy for superficial bladder carcinoma
• Large tumors contain hypoxic and necrotic areas with limited tumor
cell proliferation that are poorly accessible to drugs
• relatively resistant to chemotherapy or radiation-induced DNA
damage.
• Obligate anaerobic bacteria such as Clostridium spp. can be
delivered as spores
• germinate and proliferate, mediating an antitumor effect when
they reach the hypoxic tumor tissues
• Small tumors or metastases are usually well
oxygenated
• susceptible to antitumor effect of facultative
anaerobes (i.e., Salmonella and Escherichia
genera).
• can be used as vector to deliver toxins, cytokines,
antigens, antibodies, and antitumor genes to the
tumor.
• directly interact with certain chemotherapeutic
compounds modifying their chemical structure and
altering their activity.
• Intratumor inoculation of E. coli in tumor-bearing mice
confirmed its ability to inhibit gemcitabine and to
enhance CB1954 antitumor activity in vivo
• detailed mechanistic studies in vivo of the ability of the
microbiota modulate chemotherapy efficacy have only
been reported for platinum compounds and
cyclophosphamide (CTX).
• The gut microbiota primes tumor-infiltrating
myeloid cells to produce, via NADPH oxidase 2
(NOX2), reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are
required for oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage.
• In absence of microbiota, the drug enters the
tumor and forms platinum-DNA adducts but in
the absence of ROS production little DNA
damage is observed
• administration of probiotics containing L. acidophilus
to patients treated with radiotherapy and cisplatin
improves therapy-induced intestinal damage.
• Cyclophosphamide allows transmucosal translocation
into the mesenteric lymph nodes of gram-positive gut
bacteria.
• induces an antitumor immune response by the
activation of pathogenic T-helper 17 (pTh17,
coexpressing interferon-γ and IL-17) cells and memory
Th1 cells.
Bacteria and Immunotherapy
• The efficacy of anticancer adoptive T-cell therapy was reduced in
mice treated with antibiotics or in which the activity of the TLR4-
agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was prevented
• The TLR9 agonist CpG oligonucleotide (CpG-ODN) induces a strong
antitumor effect when injected intratumorally :
– TNF-dependent hemorrhagic necrosis
– antigen-presenting dendritic cells migrate to the tumor-draining lymph
nodes
– Myeloid cells repolarised to inflammatory state within tumor
• Immunotherapy with anti–cytotoxic T-
lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4)
• Induces mucosal damage and translocation of
Burkholderiales and Bacteroidales
• as an adjuvant for antitumor immunity and is
required for positive response to therapy.
• antitumor effect of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy
requires preexisting antitumor immunity that
is increased with Bifidobacterium spp.
• Thus therapeutically targeting the microbiota
composition may provide new tools for cancer
prevention and treatment and for improving
therapy efficacy.
• The biggest hurdle is still unidentified taxa of
bacteria and the corresponding genetic levels
at which they act.
• Thank You

Chapter 4 microbiome and cancer

  • 1.
  • 2.
    • All theepithelial barriers of our body harbor different densities of commensal microorganisms • The microbiota—including eubacteria, archaea, protists, fungi, and viruses mostly exhibits commensalism with the host. • Approximately 3 × 1013 bacterial cells present in human body, particularly abundant in lower intestine.
  • 3.
    • The numberof microbial genes in the microbiota is more than 100 times higher than that of human genes. • mutualism between the human and the microbial cells modulates most physiologic functions. • Unlike our own genome that is fixed, the microbiota metagenome can respond to environmental stimuli with rapid alteration of different strains, exchange of genetic elements, and mutations.
  • 4.
    • Factors affectingmicrobiota : – host genetics – colonization at the time of birth – type of birth delivery – individual lifestyle – diseases – exposure to antibiotics
  • 5.
    • Sequencing ofone or more variable regions of the gene-encoding 16S rRNA is the most widely used method for the identification of bacterial and archaeal taxa. • Identification of fungi relies on sequencing the internal transcribed spacer region between the 18S and 28S rRNAs. • Shotgun sequencing of the whole microbial metagenome allows a better taxonomic classification at species level
  • 6.
    • Microbiota alsoplays an important role in the cancer process affecting predisposing conditions, initiation, progression, response to therapy. • The composition of the microbiota and particularly of the very abundant gut microbiota modulates the tumor microenvironment and affects tumor growth both at the level of the epithelial barriers and systemically
  • 7.
    Bacteria as Causeof cancer • mostly limited to cancers of the GI tract and of the lung and based on the analysis of oral, fecal, and tissue samples. • Helicobacter pylori is the only bacterial species recognized as a group 1 human carcinogen. • Dysbiosis or changes in the abundance of microbial families observed in the patients may be a consequence rather than a cause of cancer
  • 8.
    • The microorganismsthat were involved in cancer initiation may no longer be present when the patients are studied. • Except for H. pylori, none of the bacteria associated with human cancer has been formally proven to be a human carcinogen • However, mechanistic studies in mice are starting to provide evidence of a direct role in colon carcinogenesis for several bacterial species
  • 11.
    • Although thesemechanisms have been studied primarily for intestinal microbiota, microbes colonizing other epithelial barriers (e.g., the oral cavity and the skin) are also expected to mediate both local and systemic effects.
  • 12.
    H Pylori andCa Stomach • H. pylori is epidemiologically associated with noncardia gastric carcinoma and lymphoma. • In most individuals it causes only gastritis but in a few patients, it causes serious pathologic lesions including atrophy, metaplasia, and cancer
  • 13.
    • Two toxin-encodinggenes cytotoxinassociated gene A (cagA) and vacuolating gene (vacA) are present in virulent and carcinogenic strains of H. Pylori. • H. pylori directly can affect genetic integrity of gastric epithelial cells by inducing DNA damage.
  • 14.
    • Development ofgastric cancer requires a multidecade exposure to the bacterium associated with: – inflammatory response inducing epithelium injury – atrophy – reduction in acid secretory functions – metaplasia.
  • 15.
    • Atrophic gastritisresults in dysbiosis and gastric colonization with cancer-provoking bacterial species of oropharyngeal or intestinal origin. • Eradication of H. pylori may enhance susceptibility to asthma and obesity as well as gastroesophageal reflux with increased risk of gastric cardia and esophageal carcinoma.
  • 16.
    • H pyloricauses intestinal metaplasia leading to intestinal type of gastric adenocarcinoma. • The intestinal type of sporadic gastric adenocarcinoma has a hallmark progression from normal gastric epithelium, to chronic atrophic gastritis (typically due to Helicobacter pylori infection) to intestinal metaplasia to dysplasia
  • 18.
    Microbiome and ColorectalCancer • Interaction between microbiota and host is particularly evident in the lower gastrointestinal tract harboring the largest number of bacteria. • Fusobacterium – normally form dental biofilms commonly found in colonic adenomas and adenocarcinomas.
  • 19.
    • F. nucleatumhas been proposed to be procarcinogenic: – by recruiting tumor-promoting myeloid cells – promoting chemo resistance by modulating autophagy – inhibiting NK and T-cell activity via binding of its Fap2 protein to the TIGIT inhibitory receptor and activating β- catenin/Wnt signaling in epithelial cells by association of its FadA adhesin to E-cadherin
  • 20.
    • FadA genetranscripts are expressed at significantly higher levels in the colon of patients with colorectal carcinoma • thus can be used as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target
  • 21.
    • Fusobacteria biofilmsproduce the polyamine metabolite N1,N12-diacetylspermine. – Enhance epithelial proliferation – diminish E-cadherin expression – activate STAT3 and interleukin (IL)-6.
  • 22.
    Genotoxic Effects • Toxinsinjectedvia type 3 secretion : – Cell toxicity via apoptosis – Repression of proton pump expression • Microbial metabolites : – Products of protien – hydrogen sulphide, cresol – Products of bile degradation – Breakdown of liver detoxified xenobiotics
  • 23.
    • Genomic instability: – Damages P53, MSH2, MLH 1 • DNA damaging toxins : – Colibactin – E.coli - disrupts SUMOylation of p53 and leads to production of proinflammatory and growth factors with tumor-promoting ability. – Cytolethal distending toxins ( CDTs) – E.coli, S.eneterica, C. jejuni
  • 24.
    • Translocation throughbarrier causing recruitment of myeloid cells • Causes activation of ROS resulting in DNA damage
  • 25.
    Activation of Cellproliferation • Fad A – Fusobacterium • Cag A – H. Pylori • BFT – Bacteroids toxin • Avirulence protien A – S enterica • Cause detachment of beta catenin from E cadherin and cause activation of beta catenin pathway
  • 26.
    • H pyloriand S enterica lead to PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathway activation.
  • 27.
    Modulation of host immunity •IL 22 and IL 6 – promote colon cancer via activation of STAT 3 • IL-18/IL-22 axis plays a particularly important role in maintaining mucosal homeostasis.
  • 28.
    Inflammasomes (NLRP3 and/orNLRP6) ↓ activated by bacterial derived small chain fatty acids (SCFAs) via GPR43 and GPR109a receptors. ↓ epithelial cell production of pro-IL-18 that is cleaved into active IL-18
  • 29.
    IL-18 then blocksmacrophage production of the soluble IL-22 antagonist IL-22BP ↓ increased production and bioavailability of IL-22 ↓ IL-22 induces STAT3 phosphorylation in epithelial cells: – promoting proliferation, – secretion of antibacterial peptides – in a positive feedback loop, enhances production of IL- 18.
  • 30.
    Immunosupressive Mechanisms • F.nucleatum promotes accumulation of immunosuppressive myeloid cells • produces the Fap2 protein • activates the inhibitory receptor TIGIT on NK and T-cells. • SCFAs induce regulatory T (Treg) cells that inhibit local immune response
  • 32.
    • Limited dataon carcinogenic potential outside GIT • possible contribution to cancers of the skin, the oropharyngeal cavity, the lung, and the urogenital tract need to be better investigated
  • 33.
    • the roleof microorganisms other than bacteria and viruses on carcinogenesis remains to be better defined. • Fungal infection with production of the carcinogenic acetaldehyde in patients with autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis ectodermal dystrophy • leads to mutations in the AIRE gene has been proposed to play a role in the oral and esophageal cancer observed in these patients. • Additionally, other members of our microbiota could also contribute to cancer including protists and helminths.
  • 34.
    Tumors in othertissues • microbiota can also affect the development of tumors in sterile tissues that are not in direct contact with the bacteria. • modulate cancer-predisposing conditions such as metabolic disease and obesity. • β-glucuronidases and β-glucuronides participate in estrogen metabolism. • affect endometrial and breast cancer through a non inflammatory pathway.
  • 35.
    Bacteria as CancerDrugs • William Coley observed that acute infections may be followed by tumor regression. • In a number of patients with soft tissue sarcoma he used “Coley’s toxins,” a combination of Streptococcus pyogenes and gram-negative Bacillus prodigiosus. • local treatment with BCG, an attenuated Mycobacterium bovis strain, is still a widely used therapy for superficial bladder carcinoma
  • 36.
    • Large tumorscontain hypoxic and necrotic areas with limited tumor cell proliferation that are poorly accessible to drugs • relatively resistant to chemotherapy or radiation-induced DNA damage. • Obligate anaerobic bacteria such as Clostridium spp. can be delivered as spores • germinate and proliferate, mediating an antitumor effect when they reach the hypoxic tumor tissues
  • 37.
    • Small tumorsor metastases are usually well oxygenated • susceptible to antitumor effect of facultative anaerobes (i.e., Salmonella and Escherichia genera). • can be used as vector to deliver toxins, cytokines, antigens, antibodies, and antitumor genes to the tumor.
  • 39.
    • directly interactwith certain chemotherapeutic compounds modifying their chemical structure and altering their activity. • Intratumor inoculation of E. coli in tumor-bearing mice confirmed its ability to inhibit gemcitabine and to enhance CB1954 antitumor activity in vivo • detailed mechanistic studies in vivo of the ability of the microbiota modulate chemotherapy efficacy have only been reported for platinum compounds and cyclophosphamide (CTX).
  • 40.
    • The gutmicrobiota primes tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells to produce, via NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2), reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are required for oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage. • In absence of microbiota, the drug enters the tumor and forms platinum-DNA adducts but in the absence of ROS production little DNA damage is observed
  • 41.
    • administration ofprobiotics containing L. acidophilus to patients treated with radiotherapy and cisplatin improves therapy-induced intestinal damage. • Cyclophosphamide allows transmucosal translocation into the mesenteric lymph nodes of gram-positive gut bacteria. • induces an antitumor immune response by the activation of pathogenic T-helper 17 (pTh17, coexpressing interferon-γ and IL-17) cells and memory Th1 cells.
  • 42.
    Bacteria and Immunotherapy •The efficacy of anticancer adoptive T-cell therapy was reduced in mice treated with antibiotics or in which the activity of the TLR4- agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was prevented • The TLR9 agonist CpG oligonucleotide (CpG-ODN) induces a strong antitumor effect when injected intratumorally : – TNF-dependent hemorrhagic necrosis – antigen-presenting dendritic cells migrate to the tumor-draining lymph nodes – Myeloid cells repolarised to inflammatory state within tumor
  • 44.
    • Immunotherapy withanti–cytotoxic T- lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) • Induces mucosal damage and translocation of Burkholderiales and Bacteroidales • as an adjuvant for antitumor immunity and is required for positive response to therapy.
  • 45.
    • antitumor effectof anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy requires preexisting antitumor immunity that is increased with Bifidobacterium spp.
  • 46.
    • Thus therapeuticallytargeting the microbiota composition may provide new tools for cancer prevention and treatment and for improving therapy efficacy. • The biggest hurdle is still unidentified taxa of bacteria and the corresponding genetic levels at which they act.
  • 47.