Chapter 3
Listening
Nation & Newton. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Listening and Speaking. Routledge.

2013.3.25.
Why Listening?
No model of second language acquisition does not avail itself of
input in trying to explain how learners create second language
grammars. (Gass, 1997: 1)
Some people now believe that learning a language is not just
learning to talk, but rather that learning a language is building a
map of meaning in the mind. These people believe that talking
may indicate that the language was learned, but they do not
believe that practice in talking is the best way to build up this
“cognitive” map in the mind.
To do this, they feel, the best method is to practice meaningful
listening. Nord (1980: 17)
Conditions of Listening
A comprehension approach can work . . . as long as the material
presented for comprehension in fact consists of (1) sufficient (2)
language instances (3) whose meaning can be inferred by
students (4) who are paying attention. Newmark (1981: 39)
Benefits of delaying speaking
• Cognitive benefit: no cognitive overload from focusing on two
  or more modes of language
• Speed of coverage
• Strong effect on motivation
• Psychological Benefit: No stress from speaking
• Ease of doing independent learning activities
Types of Listening
• One-way listening (transactional listening)
• Two-way listening (interactional listening)
Two Models of Listening
• Bottom Up Processes: the processes the listener uses to
  assemble the message piece-by piece from the speech
  stream, going from the parts to the whole
• Top Down Processes: Top-down processes: the processes the
  listener goes from the whole—their prior knowledge and their
  content and rhetorical schemata—to the parts
Importance of Bottom Up
• Tsui and Fullilove (1998) found that more skilled listeners
  performed better on comprehension questions for which the
  correct answers did not match obvious content schema for the
  topic.
• Successful comprehension was closely allied with linguistic
  (bottom-up processing). (Wu, 1998)
Lynch and Mendelsohn (2002)
•   discriminating between similar sounds
•   coping with and processing fast speech
•   processing stress and intonation differences
•   processing the meaning of different discourse markers
•   understanding communicative functions and the non-one-to-
    one equivalence between form and function, e.g., “It’s cold in
    here”.
Field’s Suggestions for Practice
1.   Reduced Forms (Contractions, Weak Forms and Chunks)
     I’ve lived in Wellington for 10 years.
2.   Assimilation and Elision
     good cause → goog cause
3.   Resyllabification
     went in → wen tin

Chapter 3

  • 1.
    Chapter 3 Listening Nation &Newton. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Listening and Speaking. Routledge. 2013.3.25.
  • 2.
    Why Listening? No modelof second language acquisition does not avail itself of input in trying to explain how learners create second language grammars. (Gass, 1997: 1)
  • 3.
    Some people nowbelieve that learning a language is not just learning to talk, but rather that learning a language is building a map of meaning in the mind. These people believe that talking may indicate that the language was learned, but they do not believe that practice in talking is the best way to build up this “cognitive” map in the mind. To do this, they feel, the best method is to practice meaningful listening. Nord (1980: 17)
  • 4.
    Conditions of Listening Acomprehension approach can work . . . as long as the material presented for comprehension in fact consists of (1) sufficient (2) language instances (3) whose meaning can be inferred by students (4) who are paying attention. Newmark (1981: 39)
  • 5.
    Benefits of delayingspeaking • Cognitive benefit: no cognitive overload from focusing on two or more modes of language • Speed of coverage • Strong effect on motivation • Psychological Benefit: No stress from speaking • Ease of doing independent learning activities
  • 6.
    Types of Listening •One-way listening (transactional listening) • Two-way listening (interactional listening)
  • 7.
    Two Models ofListening • Bottom Up Processes: the processes the listener uses to assemble the message piece-by piece from the speech stream, going from the parts to the whole • Top Down Processes: Top-down processes: the processes the listener goes from the whole—their prior knowledge and their content and rhetorical schemata—to the parts
  • 8.
    Importance of BottomUp • Tsui and Fullilove (1998) found that more skilled listeners performed better on comprehension questions for which the correct answers did not match obvious content schema for the topic. • Successful comprehension was closely allied with linguistic (bottom-up processing). (Wu, 1998)
  • 9.
    Lynch and Mendelsohn(2002) • discriminating between similar sounds • coping with and processing fast speech • processing stress and intonation differences • processing the meaning of different discourse markers • understanding communicative functions and the non-one-to- one equivalence between form and function, e.g., “It’s cold in here”.
  • 10.
    Field’s Suggestions forPractice 1. Reduced Forms (Contractions, Weak Forms and Chunks) I’ve lived in Wellington for 10 years. 2. Assimilation and Elision good cause → goog cause 3. Resyllabification went in → wen tin