CHAPIER l3 L.eadershrP high impact players, r:bange .xgents,,driuers and tuinners'-peoplet who arZ ertremely ftixible, bright, tactical and strate;gic, wlto can handkz a lot of information, make decisions qu:ick,ly, ,motiuate others, chase cr mouing target and sbake things up. Preuiously, (.orporate recruitirtg emphasized cridentials [scboolinSl] and experience, tubicb are still important, but ... yrou can,t te'ach good-ti,eadership or bow tc be excited about life"2 Robert Greenleaf, fol:mer director of Managenrent Research at Al'&T and founding director of the (lenter for Applied Ethics, said, .'The leacler exists to serve thJse whom he nominally leads, those who supposedly follow him. He (or ,l.l ,"r... their fulfillmenr as his (or her) principal aim."3 The servant-leader ,"r.., p.opre and their u,ork seriously, listens to and takes the lead from the ;";pr: heals, is self-effaci.g, and sees lhimsel I or herself as a steward.4 LEADERSHIP TRAITS Early theories about leadership suggested thaLt excellent leaders possessed certain o"i*, o, personal characteriiticq th,at lay at the root of their abilitv to lead' Following lworld war II, the U.S. Army surveyed soldiers in an attempt to coln- pit. " tiriof traits sharecl by commanders rvhom s'ldiers perceiverJ as lcaders. ?he.es,rlting list, which included 14 traits, was clearly irLadequate to describe lcadership. No t*o commanders displeryed all the traits, and rnany famous commanders lacked sever:ll' More recently, Gary Yukl constructed 'a list of traits and skills commonly associated with efiective leaders.i Figure 13..[ preserrts these traits. Yukl's list sug- gests that a leader is strongly motivated to e:<cel ancl succeed l*$rffi Dkcus:; teodfifip skilts, ond befuio troiB, rs INffIS sr0u5 il {, :\" i.t *.r re: :' .I ,' , Adaptable Alert to social environment Ambitious and achievement-oriented Assertive Cooperative ,, Decisive Dependable Dominant (desires to influence others) . Energetic (high activitY level) Persistent Self<onfident Tolerant of slress Willing to asume resPonsibilitY futrce Leodership in Otgonizotions,: /0 by Cary Yukl {O l9u1 E&-rcation, Inc., Upper Saddle River, Nl9/458 Cleverness (intelligence) Conceptual ability Creativity Diplomacy and tact Fluency in speaking Knowledge about the grouP thsk Organizational (administrative) ability Penuasiveness Socialability ,' f, ? q ;! { t I {. by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Adapted with perrnission of Pearson Do meqgd women approach leadership differently? A study of 2Js 1r+t mal*td.*8-female) owners cf privatelyheld firms with six lo 325 employees in a mid-sized ltlorlh American city presented at thre annual meeting of the Academy of f\4anagement (Seattle, August 3-6) revealed no significant difference between male and female executitre leadership. However, the owners describe gender as having an impor- tant leadership role in management. As the authors put it: Mole ond fe ...