1
KELLY SCOTT MADISON
Case Studies In
Addressable TV
2 2
Potentially combine
slides two and three
How do we define addressable?
Applying unique household or consumer behavior data to video buys to improve
targeting precision, maximize impact against select prospects & gain valuable
audience insight
Branding
Filling coverage gaps
Measurement
Using technology for insights
Political
Creating buy efficiencies
3 3
4 4
• Swim
• Gym
• The Village People
5 5
Branding:
Develop an integrated, multi-year national campaign that . . .
FORCES PEOPLE TO RETHINK WHAT THEY KNOW ABOUT,
AND HOW THEY ENGAGE WITH THE “Y”.
6 6
Build Salience
Position the brand for consumers
Establish
Relevance
Connect the Y to the cultural
conversation around change
Demonstrate
Impact
Prove that the Y has a tangible
impact on youth development
and local communities
Solicit
Contributions
Trigger donations from prime
prospects
7 7
8 8
Contextual
Relevance
Solidify the connection between Zoe, The
Y and the political landscape to insert
The YMCA into culturally relevant
moments
Social Activation
Stealth coordination across owned,
earned and paid channels to push key
brand messaging, capitalize on organic
potential and strengthen PR efforts
through the power of paid
Data Extensions
Extend value of on-air spot within key
political and cultural programming using a
multi-screen strategy grounded in TV
viewership data
Amplify linear TV efforts
with TV viewership data
Hardware-embedded
technology connects TV
content to HH
Increase buy
reach/frequency &
relevance
9
56%
Video view rate
31.6MM
Celeb
generated
impressions
137MM
PSA
impressions
54,000,000
Campaign of the Year
Finalist
iMedia Agency Awards
Trend
Impressions
Cross-screen exposure to the brand
generated an 11 percent improvement in
10 10
11
Measurement
• Large QSR
• First foray into a national video strategy
11
12
• Understand the impact of broadcast and digital video in driving
website visitation and purchases
• Set out to answer the following key questions:
• Was TV or digital more effective at driving digital conversions?
• How did different creative executions contribute to effectiveness?
• What is the best flighting schedule to maximize conversion?
• Which Television networks and digital publishers worked best?
13
• Four month test
• Combination of linear and digital properties
• Linear: AMC, ESPN, Revolution, FOOD,
TNT, truTV, MTV, and VH1
• Digital: Premium and TV Everywhere
solution
• Executed a BCR study that leveraged TV
sync technology to measure the
conversion and purchase rate within seven
days of being exposed to an ad through
the national video campaign
14
Main Takeaway: Digital channels were more effective at driving
conversions to the website, while linear TV was able to generate the
reach that was lacking from online efforts.
CAMPAIGN
REACH
83.2% 22.0%
AVG
FREQUENCY
5.1 7.0
Frequency and day of week matters
Consider attention span and live viewing habits for future network buysEvaluate both conversion and cost metrics when determining which
platforms are driving optimal performance
15 15
16
State of Michigan
advocacy campaign
(right-leaning)
January 2016:
Leading up to the
state presidential
primary
Focus on a single
Republican voter issue
that would typically
resonate with strong
Republican voters
17
• Motivate ambassadors of the cause
without alienating others
• Generate reach against a specific
target audience
18
• Statewide coverage through DISH Network and DirecTV utilizing
subscriber household data
• Used one-layer deep targeting which reached approximately 75,000
households
• Flat CPM for all target research segments allows flexibility to include
predictive attributes in creating target voter blocs
• Employed weekly frequency caps
Broader Michigan A35+ buy
delivers 21 percent reach and
produces a high cost per issue
voter. Addressable reaches only
key target audience.
Local station buy CPM = $138
Addressable CPM = $86
19
20
KELLY SCOTT MADISON
THANK YOU

Case Study in Addressable TV

  • 1.
    1 KELLY SCOTT MADISON CaseStudies In Addressable TV
  • 2.
    2 2 Potentially combine slidestwo and three How do we define addressable? Applying unique household or consumer behavior data to video buys to improve targeting precision, maximize impact against select prospects & gain valuable audience insight Branding Filling coverage gaps Measurement Using technology for insights Political Creating buy efficiencies
  • 3.
  • 4.
    4 4 • Swim •Gym • The Village People
  • 5.
    5 5 Branding: Develop anintegrated, multi-year national campaign that . . . FORCES PEOPLE TO RETHINK WHAT THEY KNOW ABOUT, AND HOW THEY ENGAGE WITH THE “Y”.
  • 6.
    6 6 Build Salience Positionthe brand for consumers Establish Relevance Connect the Y to the cultural conversation around change Demonstrate Impact Prove that the Y has a tangible impact on youth development and local communities Solicit Contributions Trigger donations from prime prospects
  • 7.
  • 8.
    8 8 Contextual Relevance Solidify theconnection between Zoe, The Y and the political landscape to insert The YMCA into culturally relevant moments Social Activation Stealth coordination across owned, earned and paid channels to push key brand messaging, capitalize on organic potential and strengthen PR efforts through the power of paid Data Extensions Extend value of on-air spot within key political and cultural programming using a multi-screen strategy grounded in TV viewership data Amplify linear TV efforts with TV viewership data Hardware-embedded technology connects TV content to HH Increase buy reach/frequency & relevance
  • 9.
    9 56% Video view rate 31.6MM Celeb generated impressions 137MM PSA impressions 54,000,000 Campaignof the Year Finalist iMedia Agency Awards Trend Impressions Cross-screen exposure to the brand generated an 11 percent improvement in
  • 10.
  • 11.
    11 Measurement • Large QSR •First foray into a national video strategy 11
  • 12.
    12 • Understand theimpact of broadcast and digital video in driving website visitation and purchases • Set out to answer the following key questions: • Was TV or digital more effective at driving digital conversions? • How did different creative executions contribute to effectiveness? • What is the best flighting schedule to maximize conversion? • Which Television networks and digital publishers worked best?
  • 13.
    13 • Four monthtest • Combination of linear and digital properties • Linear: AMC, ESPN, Revolution, FOOD, TNT, truTV, MTV, and VH1 • Digital: Premium and TV Everywhere solution • Executed a BCR study that leveraged TV sync technology to measure the conversion and purchase rate within seven days of being exposed to an ad through the national video campaign
  • 14.
    14 Main Takeaway: Digitalchannels were more effective at driving conversions to the website, while linear TV was able to generate the reach that was lacking from online efforts. CAMPAIGN REACH 83.2% 22.0% AVG FREQUENCY 5.1 7.0 Frequency and day of week matters Consider attention span and live viewing habits for future network buysEvaluate both conversion and cost metrics when determining which platforms are driving optimal performance
  • 15.
  • 16.
    16 State of Michigan advocacycampaign (right-leaning) January 2016: Leading up to the state presidential primary Focus on a single Republican voter issue that would typically resonate with strong Republican voters
  • 17.
    17 • Motivate ambassadorsof the cause without alienating others • Generate reach against a specific target audience
  • 18.
    18 • Statewide coveragethrough DISH Network and DirecTV utilizing subscriber household data • Used one-layer deep targeting which reached approximately 75,000 households • Flat CPM for all target research segments allows flexibility to include predictive attributes in creating target voter blocs • Employed weekly frequency caps Broader Michigan A35+ buy delivers 21 percent reach and produces a high cost per issue voter. Addressable reaches only key target audience. Local station buy CPM = $138 Addressable CPM = $86
  • 19.
  • 20.

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Why is addressable receiving so much attention of late? Technology within set top boxes has improved over time and recent MVPD STB upgrades have increased available addressable footprints across the US Addressable definitions have expanded to include multiple technologies beyond basic STB addressability and now include smart TV research and multi-device targeting within households
  • #5 That’s crazy, because the Y is one of America’s most important and impactful non profits. They’re the leading provider of childcare in the country, one of the last bastions of community in a world of disappearing third spaces and a provider of thousands of educational, health, social and economic programs. The Y is awesome.
  • #7 That’s crazy, because the Y is one of America’s most important and impactful non profits. They’re the leading provider of childcare in the country, one of the last bastions of community in a world of disappearing third spaces and a provider of thousands of educational, health, social and economic programs. The Y is awesome.
  • #9 - CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS – Olympics digital only
  • #18 Ad is inserted in first network promotional break during a TV session regardless of network or daypart
  • #19 DirecTV and Dish Network supplied the greatest opportunity for state coverage; 3 out of 4 subscribers are 35+, showing a higher than average propensity to vote “likely strong pro-life households.” - Post reporting shows where impressions were delivered based upon household active TV sessions and provides valuable data to target future video campaigns
  • #20 Day of week and time of day information lends insight to future TV campaigns Efficiency-driven networks like ID (Investigation Discovery) and Science were surprises Monday and Saturday viewing prevailed in Prime (no surprise) and Daytime